To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Comparative federalism.

Journal articles on the topic 'Comparative federalism'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Comparative federalism.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Wagner, Richard E., and Akira Yokoyama. "Polycentrism, Federalism, and Liberty: A Comparative Systems Perspective." Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice 31, no. 1 (April 1, 2013): 179–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/251569213x15664519748668.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Federalism is commonly thought to be a pro-liberty system of government, in contrast to a unitary system. Within a unitary system, people face but a single government that taxes and regulates. Within federal systems, however, people face two or more governments that tax and regulate. In light of this multiplicity of independent governments, it is reasonable to wonder why federalism is widely thought to be favorable to liberty. Whether federalism is or is not favorable to liberty depends on some institutional features of a federalist system. In particular, we distinguish between two systems of federalist governance: competitive federalism and cartel federalism. Where competitive federalism entails competition among all units of government, cartel federalism entails collusion among governments. Competitive federalism has a polycentric structure where no single government dominates the other governments. In contrast, cartel federalism has a monocentric structure that is dominated by the cartelizing unit of government.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tariq, Muhammad. "Comparative Analysis between Federation and Federalism." Global Regional Review V, no. I (March 30, 2020): 300–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(v-i).33.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper discusses the comparative analysis between federalism and federation. Federalism is a theoretical framework while federation is a legal term manifesting itself in pragmatic form. The former is normative while the latter is descriptive in nature. Federalism is the means while federation is the end as there can be federalism without federation but there can be no federation without federalism. Federalism refers to an ideological perspective which acts as prescriptive guide while federation connotes constitutionally well-established institution. It has been discussed in formal centralized or effective centralized form, unitary or decentralized form, symmetrical or asymmetrical form, and fully or partially centralized form. Centripetal and Centrifugal forces provide the basic framework for federalism. Various forms of federations have been discussed in parlance of three different models of federalism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Broschek, Jörg. "Historical Institutionalism and Comparative Federalism." World Political Science 8, no. 1 (September 10, 2012): 101–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/wpsr-2012-0005.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractWith some exceptions, efforts to systematically apply a historical-institutionalist framework to the study of federalism have been few and far between. This paper argues, however, that historical institutionalism lends itself particularly well for addressing two important research questions in the field of comparative federalism: the origins of federal systems and their dynamics. It is suggested that a historical-institutionalist framework can significantly contri­bute to encourage theoretical cross-fertilization within the field of comparative federalism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Stevens, Kenneth R. "Perspectives on Comparative Federalism." European Journal of Law Reform 20, no. 2-3 (June 2018): 120–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.5553/ejlr/138723702018020002007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Elazar, Daniel J. "International and Comparative Federalism." PS: Political Science and Politics 26, no. 2 (June 1993): 190. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/419827.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Elazar, Daniel J. "International and Comparative Federalism." PS: Political Science & Politics 26, no. 02 (June 1993): 190–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049096500037768.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kincaid, John, and Richard L. Cole. "Is Federalism Still the “Dark Continent” of Political Science Teaching? Yes and No." PS: Political Science & Politics 47, no. 04 (October 2014): 877–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049096514001218.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACTFederalism is a core principle of American government; yet, how much attention is given to federalism beyond introductory courses? A 1969 study described American federalism as the “dark continent” of political science teaching. Based on surveys of chairs of US departments of political science and members of the APSA’s section on federalism and intergovernmental relations in 2013, the authors found that these course offerings have increased markedly since 1969, that the courses cover a range of topics, and that many department chairs are interested in offering these courses in the future. However, the teaching of comparative federalism lags far behind American federalism. Thus, comparative federalism remains a “dark continent” of federalism teaching.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Dunn, Christopher, and Ronald L. Watts. "Executive Federalism: A Comparative Analysis." Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques 18, no. 2 (June 1992): 233. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3551434.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Stepan, Alfred. "Russian Federalism in Comparative Perspective." Post-Soviet Affairs 16, no. 2 (April 2000): 133–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2000.10641484.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Busygina, I. M., and M. Filippov. "ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF FAILURE: RUSSIAN EXPERIENCE FOR THE COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM RESEARCH." Вестник Пермского университета. Политология 14, no. 3 (2020): 6–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2020-3-6-19.

Full text
Abstract:
In the 1990s, Russian federalism was the pride of Russian reforms, a convincing proof of the irreversibility of democratization. Today, only the formal shells of federal institutions remain. However, the lessons of Russian federalism have greatly enriched research on comparative federalism: for the first time, a country of such territorial scale and diversity consciously built federal relations, while in the conditions of an extremely unfavorable heritage, the presence of an ethnic "component" and pronounced asymmetries. The Russian case showed that federalism significantly complicates the transition to democracy if democratic and federal insti-tution-building develop simultaneously. In addition, the case of Russia once again confirmed that federalism could not survive without being supported by other institutions; a necessary condition for the survival of fed-eralism is the development of democratic competition in the direction of strengthening the role of political parties interested in federalism. The lessons of the 90s in Russia may prove useful both to other countries that have chosen federalism and to Russia itself, since any significant reforms will inevitably lead to a change in the nature of relations between the center and the regions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Kincaid, John, and Mark Tushnet. "Comparative Constitutional Federalism: Europe and America." CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs 22, no. 1 (1992): 150. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3330241.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Parikh, Sunita, and Barry R. Weingast. "A Comparative Theory of Federalism: India." Virginia Law Review 83, no. 7 (October 1997): 1593. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1073770.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Watts, Ronald L. "Introduction: Comparative Research and Fiscal Federalism." Regional & Federal Studies 13, no. 4 (December 2003): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13597560308559442.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Erk, J. "Comparative Federalism as a Growth Industry." Publius: The Journal of Federalism 37, no. 2 (January 24, 2007): 262–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjm004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Kelemen, R. Daniel. "Regulatory Federalism: EU Environmental Regulation in Comparative Perspective." Journal of Public Policy 20, no. 2 (August 2000): 133–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00000799.

Full text
Abstract:
This article analyzes the development of environmental regulation in the European Union from the perspective of comparative federalism. It presents a theory of regulatory federalism that explains how the basic institutional structures of federal-type polities shape the development of regulatory policy. The article assesses the theory by systematically comparing the development of environmental regulation in the EU, the US, Canada and Australia. The analysis suggests that the EU's institutional structure encourages the development of a US-style pattern of regulation, characterized by detailed, non-discretionary rules and a litigious approach to enforcement.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Pascual, Maribel González. "Methods of Interpreting Competence Norms: Judicial Allocation of Powers in a Comparative Perspective." German Law Journal 14, no. 8 (August 1, 2013): 1501–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200002376.

Full text
Abstract:
The comparative constitutional analysis of federalism is particularly complex. On the one hand, “[e]ach federal bargain is in important respects unique to the parties' situation,” in contrast to constitutional provisions asserted to guarantee fundamental rights. On the other hand, “provisions concerning federalism may have different historical meanings in a particular polity, tied in different ways to the political compromises.” In addition, the federal system relies on an “interrelated package of arrangements.” Therefore, no element should be considered isolated from other elements of the federal compromise. As a consequence, in order to compare federalism issues it may be necessary to evaluate “the entire interrelated structure.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Burroughs, Benjamin, and Evan Vilos. "Putting the Safe Back Into the Safeguards of Federalism: A Comparative Analysis of the Complexities of Political Safeguards." Federalism-E 8, no. 1 (May 1, 2007): 78–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/fede.v8i1.13641.

Full text
Abstract:
To fully comprehend how the political safeguards of federalism actually guard federalism and preserve the Constitutional balance between State and national government, we must chart its history in order to better ascertain the implications of political safeguards in our day. In contrasting the work of Wechsler and Kramer with that of Smith, we are able to view the complexities concerning the debate as to how political parties and judicial reviews function to safeguard federalism. In building off Kramer’s views that informal means such as political parties constitute a political safeguard of federalism, we draw attention to the potential obstacles that interest groups pose to the safeguarding process [...]
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Gupta, Shivanshi, and Arushi Sharma. "Federalism: comparative study between India and Canada." International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 1, no. 1 (2022): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijhrcs.2022.10047636.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Dardanelli, Paolo. "Conclusions: comparative federalism and the constitutional treaty." Regional & Federal Studies 15, no. 2 (June 2005): 259–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13597560500115659.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Braun, Dietmar. "Making Federalism More Efficient: A Comparative Assessment." Acta Politica 43, no. 1 (March 24, 2008): 4–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500210.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Jackson, V. C. "Comparative constitutional federalism and transnational judicial discourse." International Journal of Constitutional Law 2, no. 1 (January 1, 2004): 91–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.1.91.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Gamper, Anna. "A “Global Theory of Federalism”: The Nature and Challenges of a Federal State." German Law Journal 6, no. 10 (October 1, 2005): 1297–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200014334.

Full text
Abstract:
Innumerable attempts have been made to explore the theoretical nature of federalism. Due to the long history, worldwide existence and interdisciplinary character of federalism, a plethora of literature has been written on the topic. Yet, these endeavours have not even resulted in a clear and commonly used definition of the term. Surely, it is one of the great dilemmas of this field of research that despite so much discussion, there is no settled common denominator of ‘federalism'. Whereas practical studies and exchange of experience between the various federal systems offer a more conventional research arena, comparative theoretical approaches are much more seldom. This is not the least because of the tremendous semantic challenges of a comparative theoretical approach. At first glance, it is sometimes difficult to understand the terminology of federalism, the meaning of which differs according to the perspectives of constitutional law, political science or economics. Even more difficulty arises when the substance of federal theories is discussed. Again, differences between theories may be due to different academic approaches, particularly between understanding federalism as an overall principle or as a more concrete concept of a federal state and, in particular, whether the constituent units of a federal state are states, and, if states, whether they are sovereign.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Baldi, Brunetta. "Il federalismo competitivo: l'Italia in prospettiva comparata." TEORIA POLITICA, no. 2 (October 2009): 95–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/tp2009-002005.

Full text
Abstract:
- The article analyses the most recent reforms of Italian regionalism using the theory of competitive federalism as opposed to cooperative federalism. Although new competitive dynamics are developing with main reference to asymmetrical regionalism and fiscal federalism, the article shows the coexistence of competitive and cooperative institutional arrangements. Taking a comparative perspective the case of Italy portrays similarities to those of Germany and Spain: German cooperative federalism is more and more challenged by the developing of competitive dynamics between the Western and Eastern Länder as well as Spanish competitive regionalism is opening up to intergovernmental cooperation to assure policy coordination. As a whole the article provides an analytical framework to guide future empirical research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Gulyakov, A. D. "Models of federalism in Switzerland and Germany: a comparative analysis." Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)), no. 7 (October 13, 2021): 108–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.83.7.108-118.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is the first to structure the concept of “model of federalism”. According to the author, it includes such essential elements as the initial factors that influenced the formation of the state, the stages of its development and the essential components of the model, namely, historical-typological and genesis ones features of federalism and the vector of development. Based on the use of historical and state literature, constitutional and legal materials, and the results of a recently published international political science project, the author examines the models of federalism of neighboring countries-Switzerland and Germany, formed in the middle of the XIX century, proposes its graphic description. These states vary in territorial extent and state dynamics, but are still similar at the initial stages of the formation of a federal model, namely the transition to a federal form from a confederal one. Also, the Swiss and German models were radically different from the point of view of their essence and their genesis, but they had a uniform centripetal vector, which in modern globalization conditions is characterized by a strengthening of the management center and a decrease in the autonomy of the subjects.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Suleimanov, M. M. "Formation of a functional and effective model of tax federalism: Criteria and factors." Finance and Credit 26, no. 12 (December 25, 2020): 2724–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.24891/fc.26.12.2724.

Full text
Abstract:
Subject. This article explores the criteria and factors of forming a functional effective model of tax federalism, the combination of financial relationships arising in the process of allocation of taxes between public power levels. The Russian model of tax federalism is the subject of research. Objectives. The article aims to develop theoretical provisions and practical recommendations to improve the system of delimitation of authorities for government agencies and municipalities, build a functional and effective model of tax federalism to stimulate the growth of tax potential of the subjects of the Russian Federation and municipal entities. Methods. For the study, I used the methods of comparative analysis, synthesis, and comparison. Results. The article proposes criteria and factors that determine the formation of a functional effective model of tax federalism aimed at increasing the tax potential of the Russian Federation constituent entities and municipalities. Conclusions and Relevance. The article concludes that the most important characteristic of the tax federalism model is functional efficiency. When determining the quality of the existing model, it is necessary to rely on the degree of implementation of the functional purpose of tax federalism. The significance of the study lies in the development of theoretical provisions and practical recommendations aimed at forming a functional and effective model of tax federalism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Zinchenko, O. V., and V. A. Shcherbyna. "FEATURES OF INDIAN AND BRAZIL FEDERALISM: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS." Comparative-analytical law, no. 1 (2020): 99–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/2524-0390/2020.1.20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Mazza, Mauro. "Some Observations on Indian Federalism in Comparative Perspective." Beijing Law Review 06, no. 01 (2015): 23–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/blr.2015.61004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Rodden, Jonathan. "Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement." Comparative Politics 36, no. 4 (July 2004): 481. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4150172.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Hueglin, Thomas O. "From Constitutional to Treaty Federalism: A Comparative Perspective." CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs 30, no. 4 (2000): 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3330935.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Watts, Ronald L. "Daniel J. Elazar: Comparative Federalism and Post-Statism." CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs 30, no. 4 (2000): 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3330936.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Hueglin, T. O. "From Constitutional to Treaty Federalism: A Comparative Perspective." Publius: The Journal of Federalism 30, no. 4 (January 1, 2000): 137–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a030100.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Watts, R. L. "Daniel J. Elazar: Comparative Federalism and Post-Statism." Publius: The Journal of Federalism 30, no. 4 (January 1, 2000): 155–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a030101.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Strazzari, Davide. "Linguistic Integration Test and Federalism: A Comparative Analysis." European Journal of Migration and Law 18, no. 4 (November 14, 2016): 442–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342109.

Full text
Abstract:
A good number of European states have introduced legal provisions providing for integration tests for migrants: knowledge of the host state’s language and civic values are required during all stages of a migrant’s stay, either as a precondition for entry or as a criterion for remaining on the state’s territory. In those states where a common nationwide language exists, the choice of the language utilized for the measurement of integration is unproblematic. However, things are different in multinational countries or in countries with national linguistic minorities, where several languages enjoy an official status, according to criteria based upon territorial subdivision. In such cases, subnational units where national minorities are settled may enforce measures with the aim of compelling immigrants to learn the local language rather than the national one. I brand such developments “cultural regional citizenship”. On the basis of a comparative analysis that takes into account the cases of Italy, Spain and Belgium, this article considers how the issue is influenced by intergovernmental relations between national and subnational jurisdictions, on the one hand, and the protection of fundamental rights and the proportionality principle, on the other.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Brown, Douglas M. "Comparative Climate Change Policy and Federalism: An Overview." Review of Policy Research 29, no. 3 (May 2012): 322–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00562.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Ferrara, Ida, Paul Missios, and Halis Murat Yildiz. "Inter-regional competition, comparative advantage and environmental federalism." Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 47, no. 3 (August 2014): 905–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caje.12098.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Marsh, Christopher, and James Cole Bucy. "Negotiating Russian Federalism: A Simulation for Comparative Politics." International Studies Perspectives 3, no. 4 (November 2002): 373–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.t01-1-00100.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Wilson, Gary N. "Nested Federalism in Arctic Quebec: A Comparative Perspective." Canadian Journal of Political Science 41, no. 1 (March 2008): 71–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423908080116.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract.The creation of an autonomous region of Nunavikwithinthe province of Quebec would constitute a new phase in the development of Canadian federalism. Although there is no existing domestic model for such a political arrangement, the system of nested federalism in the Russian Federation offers a useful comparative tool for examining the internal and external features of the emerging system of government in Nunavik, as well as the challenges of operationalizing and embedding such a system within the Canadian federal structure. This article outlines the basic principles of nested federalism and considers them in light of recent developments in the region of Nunavik, including the initialing of an “Agreement in Principle concerning the amalgamation of certain public institutions and the creation of the Nunavik Regional Government” between the regional, provincial and federal governments in August 2007. The article concludes that although the Agreement in Principle does not entrench the types of intergovernmental mechanisms and jurisdictional powers that were recommended by the 2001 Report of the Nunavik Commission and that are necessary to the proper functioning of a nested federal arrangement, the political amalgamation outlined in this document represents a significant step forward in terms of creating an institutional framework for an autonomous, nested region in Nunavik.Résumé.La création d'une région autonome du Nunavik à l'intérieur de la province du Québec constituerait une nouvelle phase dans le développement du fédéralisme canadien. Bien qu'il n'y ait aucun modèle domestique existant d'un tel arrangement politique le système de fédéralisme “encastré” dans la Fédération Russe offre un outil comparatif utile pour examiner les caractéristiques internes et externes du système de gouvernement émergeant au Nunavik. L'exemple russe démontre aussi les défis fonctionnels liés à l'établissement d'un tel système à l'intérieur de la structure fédérale existante au Canada. Cet article développe les principes de base d'un “fédéralisme encastré” et les considère en vue des développements récents dans la région du Nunavik, incluant les négociations pour un “Entente de principe sur la fusion de certaines institutions publiques et la création du gouvernement régional du Nunavik” entre les différents gouvernements régional, provincial et fédéral en août 2007. L'article conclut que bien que l'Accord de Principe n'inclut pas les types de mécanismes intergouvernementaux et les pouvoirs juridictionnels qui étaient recommandés dans le Rapport de 2001 de la Commission de Nunavik et qui sont nécessaires au bon fonctionnement d'un arrangement fédéral “encastré,” le fusionnement politique développé dans ce document représente un pas en avant significatif dans la construction institutionnelle d'un Nunavik autonome à l'intérieur du Québec.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Barrios-Suvelza, Franz Xavier. "Neither unitary nor federal: Did Bolivians invent something new?" International Political Science Review 41, no. 3 (June 3, 2019): 402–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512119829475.

Full text
Abstract:
The unitary–federal dichotomy is used as a standard means for taxonomizing state forms. However, its classificatory power has been increasingly stretched by heterodox cases such as Spain, Italy, South Africa and, most recently, Bolivia. This article contends that Bolivia’s constitutional changes have definitively challenged the long-standing assumption that the unitary–federal divide best serves the goal of an accurate taxonomization in the field of comparative federalism. Despite the noise Bolivia’s latest constitutional reform has caused in the otherwise settled framework of comparative federalism’s most basic concepts, scholarship is opting for the most comfortable choice by squeezing Bolivia into the unitary compartment. Subsequent to the screening of different types of taxonomic approaches, a new classificatory framework for state forms, based on a dichotomy that combines legal theory and the methodological tools of political science, is proposed and tested on the Bolivian case.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Bzdera, André. "Comparative Analysis of Federal High Courts: A Political Theory of Judicial Review." Canadian Journal of Political Science 26, no. 1 (March 1993): 3–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900002420.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractConstitutionalists and political scientists often claim that federal high courts are neutral and impartial arbiters of federalism disputes. However, analysis of the political impact of nine federal high courts on the division of powers clearly indicates that such courts are best characterized as centralist and nationalist. This is largely the result of the strong institutional factors that link the federal high court to the political institutions of the central government, notably the process by which federal judges are appointed. The political theory of federalism must thus be modified to take into account the centralist function of judicial review.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Kelemen, R. Daniel. "The Structure And Dynamics Of Eu Federalism." Comparative Political Studies 36, no. 1-2 (February 2003): 184–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414002239376.

Full text
Abstract:
This article analyzes European Union (EU) politics through the lens of comparative federalism. The article assesses the contributions that rationalist and constructivist approaches can make to the analysis of EU federalism, focusing on two broad questions. First, what explains shifts in authority from the state (i.e., member states) to the federal (i.e., EU) level? Second, what explains the degree to which the federal government constrains state discretion? This article develops testable hypotheses based on the rationalist and constructivist perspectives and presents a set of initial plausibility probes. The article shows that there is considerable room for dialogue between rationalist and constructivist perspectives and together they can provide a more comprehensive explanation for the dynamics of EU federalism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Roeder, Philip G. "Soviet Federalism and Ethnic Mobilization." World Politics 43, no. 2 (January 1991): 196–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2010471.

Full text
Abstract:
Central among recent changes in the Soviet Union is an expanding and increasingly public politics of federalism. The Soviet developmental strategy assigned federalism and the cadres of national-territorial administration a central role in its response to the “nationalities question.” This strategy offers a key to three questions about the rise of assertive ethnofederalism over the past three decades: Why have federal institutions that provided interethnic peace during the transition to industrialization become vehicles of protest in recent years? Why have relatively advantaged ethnic groups been most assertive, whereas groups near the lower end of most comparative measures of socioeconomic and political success have been relatively quiescent? Why have major public demands—and the most important issues of contention between center and periphery—focused to such a large degree upon the details of the Soviet developmental strategy and upon federalism in particular
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Bogdanor, Vernon. "Federalism in Switzerland." Government and Opposition 23, no. 1 (1988): 69–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0017257x00017012.

Full text
Abstract:
‘FEDERALISM’, CLAIMED THE SWISS PHILOSOPHER, DENIS DE Rougemont, ‘rests upon the love of complexity, by contrast with the brutal simplicity which characterises the totalitarian spirit’. It would be hard to deny that complexity is the most striking feature of federal government in Switzerland. To comprehend it fully, one would have to analyse the history, politics and atmosphere of each of the twenty-six cantons, for each is a political system in itself; and there is no such animal as a ‘typical’ canton. Political scientists have studied one or two cantons in some depth, and there are also impressionistic accounts of cantonal life, but there is no really satisfactory comparative analysis of the cantons as a whole. Further, many Swiss cantons are ‘closed' societies, difficult for the foreigner to penetrate and not easily accessible to the academic inquirer. The political scientist needs to acquire the skills of the anthropologist in addition to those of the analyst of political institutions if he is to make headway. It is difficult, therefore, to give anything more than a very general impression of the principles lying behind federal government in Switzerland, an impression which is bound to be, to some degree at least, misleading. For of no country more than Switzerland is it more correct to say that the truth lies in the minute particulars and not in generalities.The complexity of Swiss federalism is a consequence of the fact that the Swiss have embraced more completely than any other democracy that essential principle, the leitmotiv, of federalism — the sharing of power. Switzerland is indeed an extreme example of federalism, just as it is an extreme example of the application of the principles of democracy and of neutrality in foreign affairs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Sonnicksen, Jared. "Can the EU be a federal democracy? Assessing the horizontal and vertical dimension of the EU government from comparative perspective." Comparative European Politics 20, no. 1 (November 21, 2021): 114–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00265-2.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe European Union remains an ambivalent polity. This uncertainty complicates the assessment of its democratic and federal quality. Drawing on comparative federalism research can contribute not only to making sense of whether, or rather which kind of federalism the EU has developed. It can also enable addressing such a compounded, but necessary inquiry into the federal and democratic character of the EU and how to ascertain which type of democratic government for which type of federal union may be appropriate. The article first elaborates a framework to assess the dimensions of federal and democratic government, drawing on comparative federalism research to delineate basic types of federal democracy. Here the democratic dimension of government is taken as referring primarily to the horizontal division of powers (among ‘branches’) of government, the federal dimension to the vertical division of powers (among ‘levels’) of governments. The framework is applied to the government of the EU in order to gauge its own type(s) of division of power arrangements and the interlinkage between them. Finally, the discussion reflects on whether or rather how the EU could comprise a federal democracy, especially in light of recent crisis challenges and subsequent institutional developments in EU governance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Kellas, James. "Comparative federalism and federation: competing traditions and future directions." International Affairs 70, no. 2 (April 1994): 309. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2625248.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Jackson, Vicki C. "Narratives of Federalism: Of Continuities and Comparative Constitutional Experience." Duke Law Journal 51, no. 1 (October 2001): 223. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1373233.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Elazar, Daniel J., Michael Burgess, and Alain-G. Gagnon. "Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing Traditions and Future Directions." CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs 25, no. 1 (1995): 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3330661.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Watts, Ronald, Michael Burgess, and Alain-G. Gagnon. "Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing Traditions and Future Directions." CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs 23, no. 4 (1993): 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3330885.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Sergevnin, Sergey L., and Alla A. Eliseeva. "On Some Issues of Comparative Law Research on Federalism." Constitutional and municipal law 6 (June 10, 2020): 29–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2020-6-29-36.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Moon, David S. "Book Review: Comparative Politics: New Directions in Federalism Studies." Political Studies Review 10, no. 3 (August 7, 2012): 431–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00280_5.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Kildea, Paul. "The future of Australian federalism: comparative and interdisciplinary perspectives." Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 51, no. 3 (July 2013): 402–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2013.805546.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography