Academic literature on the topic 'Comparative methods'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Comparative methods.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Comparative methods"
Yusupov, Azamat, Muyassar Khamitovna Karimova, and Mastona Zakirkhodzhayeva. "COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TONOMETRY METHODS." UZBEK MEDICAL JOURNAL Special issue, no. 3 (September 30, 2021): 21–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.26739/2181-0664-2021-si-3-4.
Full textYusupov, Azamat, Muyassar Khamitovna Karimova, and Mastona Zakirkhodzhayeva. "COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TONOMETRY METHODS." UZBEK MEDICAL JOURNAL Special issue, no. 3 (September 30, 2021): 21–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.26739/2181-0664-2021-si-3-4.
Full textFitzgerald, Tanya. "Comparative historical methods." History of Education 44, no. 3 (March 5, 2015): 400–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0046760x.2015.1015629.
Full textCornwell, Will, and Shinichi Nakagawa. "Phylogenetic comparative methods." Current Biology 27, no. 9 (May 2017): R333—R336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.049.
Full textKim, Tae-Woong. "Comparative Analysis of Estimation Methods for Basin Averaged Effective Rainfall Using NRCS-CN Method." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 34, no. 2 (2014): 493. http://dx.doi.org/10.12652/ksce.2014.34.2.0493.
Full textLohr, Kathleen N. "Comparative Effectiveness Research Methods." Medical Care 48 (June 2010): S3—S6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181e10434.
Full textBolbakov, R. G., A. V. Sinitsyn, and V. Ya Tsvetkov. "Methods of comparative analysis." Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1679 (November 2020): 052047. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1679/5/052047.
Full textThiem, Alrik. "Unifying Configurational Comparative Methods." Sociological Methods & Research 43, no. 2 (October 30, 2013): 313–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500481.
Full textUyeda, Josef C., Rosana Zenil-Ferguson, and Matthew W. Pennell. "Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods." Systematic Biology 67, no. 6 (April 25, 2018): 1091–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy031.
Full textGittleman, J. L., and H. Luh. "On Comparing Comparative Methods." Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, no. 1 (November 1992): 383–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002123.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Comparative methods"
Eriksen, Niklas. "Combinatorial methods in comparative genomics." Doctoral thesis, KTH, Mathematics, 2003. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-3508.
Full textPurvis, A. "Comparative methods : theory and practice." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1992. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.315843.
Full textSingh, Jagmeet 1980. "Comparative analysis of robust design methods." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/35630.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. 161-163).
Robust parameter design is an engineering methodology intended as a cost effective approach to improve the quality of products, processes and systems. Control factors are those system parameters that can be easily controlled and manipulated. Noise factors are those system parameters that are difficult and/or costly to control and are presumed uncontrollable. Robust parameter design involves choosing optimal levels of the controllable factors in order to obtain a target or optimal response with minimal variation. Noise factors bring variability into the system, thus affecting the response. The aim is to properly choose the levels of control factors so that the process is robust or insensitive to the variation caused by noise factors. Robust parameter design methods are used to make systems more reliable and robust to incoming variations in environmental effects, manufacturing processes and customer usage patterns. However, robust design can become expensive, time consuming, and/or resource intensive. Thus research that makes robust design less resource intensive and requires less number of experimental runs is of great value. Robust design methodology can be expressed as multi-response optimization problem.
(cont.) The objective functions of the problem being: maximizing reliability and robustness of systems, minimizing the information and/or resources required for robust design methodology, and minimizing the number of experimental runs needed. This thesis discusses various noise factor strategies which aim to reduce number of experimental runs needed to improve quality of system. Compound Noise and Take-The-Best-Few Noise Factors Strategy are such noise factor strategies which reduce experimental effort needed to improve reliability of systems. Compound Noise is made by combing all the different noise factors together, irrespective of the number of noise factors. But such a noise strategy works only for the systems which show effect sparsity. To apply the Take-The-Best-Few Noise Factors Strategy most important noise factors in system's noise factor space are found. Noise factors having significant impact on system response variation are considered important. Once the important noise factors are identified, they are kept independent in the noise factor array. By selecting the few most important noise factors for a given system, run size of experiment is minimized.
(cont.) Take-The-Best-Few Noise Factors Strategy is very effective for all kinds of systems irrespective of their effect sparsity. Generally Take-The-Best-Few Noise Factors Strategy achieves nearly 80% of the possible improvement for all systems. This thesis also tries to find the influence of correlation and variance of induced noise on quality of system. For systems that do not contain any significant three-factor interactions correlation among noise factors can be neglected. Hence amount of information needed to improve the quality of systems is reduced.
by Jagmeet Singh.
Ph.D.
Zeitler, Berndt. "A comparative study of source substitution methods." [S.l.] : [s.n.], 2005. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=974828165.
Full textFuxelius, Hans-Henrik. "Methods and Applications in Comparative Bacterial Genomics." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala universitet, Molekylär evolution, 2007. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8398.
Full textMota, Pedro Jorge Gomes. "Comparative analysis of multicriteria decision making methods." Master's thesis, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/11263.
Full textThe main objective of this dissertation is to perform a Comparative Analysis of different Multicriteria Decision Making Methods applied to real-world problems, in order to produce relevant information to enable the incorporation of those methods on computational platforms. The current document presents a simple case study concerning a decision support application targeted for a real problem regarding retrofitting alternatives of a building with energy efficiency impact. The application process was started with the selection of two Multicriteria Decision Making Methods guided by a preexisting framework, and resulted in the choice of AHP and PROMETHEE II methodologies. These two methods were then combined with three different decision maker profiles (Conservative, Moderate and Aggressive) created by means of risk assessment profiling techniques for portfolio allocation. Afterwards, the chosen decision criteria were disposed in a Risk Pyramid according to their inherent level of risk regarding project evaluation. A match was then performed between the decision maker profiles and each criterion, so as to define a proper set of weights for the decision criteria and preference functions, with corresponding preference and indifference thresholds. Finally, three different sets of results (one for each decision maker profile) were produced using appropriate software, and a Sensitivity Analysis was performed over the criteria to understand their influence on the solution. The general conclusion of this Comparative Analysis is that the increase in the preference modelling ability of the methods brings up the least expected alternatives as recommendations for the decision maker. Besides, we have concluded that the decision profiles that allocate bigger weights to the riskiest criteria are the ones that produce the more dispersed set of results within each method application and within each decision maker profile.
Perkins, Crysta. "A Comparative Evaluation of Functional Analytic Methods." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2018. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1157622/.
Full textAlqahtani, Abdullah Ayed F. "Comparative Analysis of Roundabout Capacity Analysis Methods." University of Dayton / OhioLINK, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=dayton1557252181941848.
Full textHawley, Kevin J. "A comparative analysis of areal interpolation methods." Connect to resource, 2005. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=osu1139949635.
Full textMeyer, Irmtraud Margret. "Mathematical methods for comparative Ab initio gene prediction." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.619669.
Full textBooks on the topic "Comparative methods"
1965-, Rihoux Benoît, and Ragin Charles C, eds. Comparative methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2009.
Find full textKlump, G. M., R. J. Dooling, R. R. Fay, and W. C. Stebbins, eds. Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7463-2.
Full textComparative politics: Theory and methods. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press, 1998.
Find full textComparative politics: Theory and methods. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
Find full textWalker, Simon. Comparative underground coal mining methods. Londpn: IEA Coal Research, 1996.
Find full textBerg-Schlosser, Dirk. Mixed Methods in Comparative Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137283375.
Full textHendry, G. A. F., and J. P. Grime, eds. Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1494-3.
Full textJohnson, Timothy P., Beth-Ellen Pennell, Ineke A. L. Stoop, and Brita Dorer, eds. Advances in Comparative Survey Methods. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Comparative methods"
Hopkin, Jonathan. "Comparative Methods." In Theory and Methods in Political Science, 249–67. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-62889-2_13.
Full textHague, Rod, and Martin Harrop. "Comparative methods." In Comparative Government and Politics, 361–74. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-31786-5_19.
Full textBurnham, Peter, Karin Gilland Lutz, Wyn Grant, and Zig Layton-Henry. "Comparative Methods." In Research Methods in Politics, 69–95. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36556-8_4.
Full textThomas, Derek. "Comparative Structural Methods." In Masters of the Structural Aesthetic, 109–21. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5445-7_4.
Full textPenner, Merrilyn J. "Psychophysical Methods." In Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics, 47–57. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7463-2_5.
Full textCheng, Jan-Fang, James R. Priest, and Len A. Pennacchio. "Comparative Genomics." In Methods in Molecular Biology, 229–51. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-030-0_13.
Full textXia, Xuhua. "Comparative Genomics and the Comparative Methods." In Comparative Genomics, 21–47. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37146-2_2.
Full textPatten, Mildred L., and Michelle Newhart. "Causal-Comparative Studies." In Understanding Research Methods, 16–18. Tenth edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315213033-6.
Full textAnselmetti, Yoann, Nina Luhmann, Sèverine Bérard, Eric Tannier, and Cedric Chauve. "Comparative Methods for Reconstructing Ancient Genome Organization." In Comparative Genomics, 343–62. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7463-4_13.
Full textWong, Mathew Y. H. "Methods in Comparative Politics." In Comparative Hong Kong Politics, 15–33. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3096-3_2.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Comparative methods"
Yelistratova, Irina. "Comparative analysis of superresolution methods." In 2017 International Multi-Conference on Engineering, Computer and Information Sciences (SIBIRCON). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sibircon.2017.8109869.
Full textGael, Pankai, Mahesh Chandra, Prateek Saxena, and V. K. Gupta. "Comparative analysis of speech enhancement methods." In 2013 Tenth International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks - (WOCN). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/wocn.2013.6616238.
Full textChen, Xuezhong, Huan Yang, and Zhaohan Sheng. "Comparative Analysis of System Evaluation Methods." In 2009 First International Conference on Information Science and Engineering. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icise.2009.407.
Full textBouzoubaa, Kawtar, Youssef Taher, and Benayad Nsiri. "Comparative Study of Features Selection Methods." In ICACS'20: 2020 4th International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3423390.3423393.
Full textAhmadzadeh, Mohammad R., P. Duree, and Maria Petrou. "Comparative study of terrain interpolation methods." In Remote Sensing, edited by Giovanna Cecchi, Edwin T. Engman, and Eugenio Zilioli. SPIE, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.373122.
Full textDyakova, O. V., A. V. Alexandria, and A. G. Solovyov. "COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTION METHODS." In INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION. DSTU-Print, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23947/itno.2020.455-457.
Full textGang Yao, G. Buttazzo, and M. Bertogna. "Comparative evaluation of limited preemptive methods." In Factory Automation (ETFA 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/etfa.2010.5641199.
Full textKang, Yong-Suk, Hee-Hoon Cho, Yongtae Shin, and Jong-Bae Kim. "Comparative Study of Penetration Test Methods." In Art, Culture, Game, Graphics, Broadcasting and digital Contents 2015. Science & Engineering Research Support soCiety, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/astl.2015.87.08.
Full textLi, Jie-Gu, Jun Zhang, and Qian-bang Yang. "Comparative study on image matching methods." In International Symposium on Multispectral Image Processing, edited by Ji Zhou, Anil K. Jain, Tianxu Zhang, Yaoting Zhu, Mingyue Ding, and Jianguo Liu. SPIE, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.323673.
Full textTerentiev, Evgeni N., and Nikolai E. Terentiev. "Comparative analysis of methods of superresolution." In Aerospace/Defense Sensing, Simulation, and Controls, edited by Stephen K. Park, Zia-ur Rahman, and Robert A. Schowengerdt. SPIE, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.438258.
Full textReports on the topic "Comparative methods"
Wong, John, Elizabeth DeLong, and Thomas Trikalinos. Integrating Analytical Methods to Improve Comparative Effectiveness Research. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI), September 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.25302/9.2019.me.13035894.
Full textWhite, M. D., B. P. McGrail, and S. K. Wurstner. Comparative Assessment of Advanced Gas Hydrate Production Methods. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/973071.
Full textWood, David P., and William G. Wood. Comparative Evaluations of Four Specification Methods for Real-Time Systems. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada219187.
Full textPorter, R. D., D. M. Hamby, and J. E. Martin. Treatment methods and comparative risks of thorium removal from waste residues. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/290911.
Full textDong, Cheryl. A comparative study of three language sampling methods using developmental sentence scoring. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.5473.
Full textTraoré, Fousseini, Alhassane Camara, and Kike Yra Fonton. A comparative analysis of updating and balancing methods for social accounting matrices. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.136394.
Full textSchneeweiss, Sebastian, Richard Wyss, Mark van der Laan, Samuel Lendle, Cheng Ju, and Jessica Franklin. Methods for Improving Confounding Control in Comparative Effectiveness Research Using Electronic Healthcare Databases. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI), August 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.25302/7.2019.me.13035638.
Full textGregurick, S. K. AB Initio Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction: Comparative-Genetic Algorithm with Graph Theoretical Methods. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/834523.
Full textLee, Yuh-Jeng, and Valdis Berzins. Systematic Development of Hard Real-Time Software: A Comparative Study of Three Methods. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada252784.
Full textCollin, R. E. Comparative Evaluation of Kirchhoff, Perturbation, and Full Wave Methods for Rough Surface Scattering. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, August 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada271198.
Full text