Relevant bibliographies by topics / Comparative osteology

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Comparative osteology'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 3 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Comparative osteology.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Comparative osteology"

1

Villa, Andrea, Martin Kirchner, David M. Alba, Federico Bernardini, Arnau Bolet, Àngel H. Luján, Josep Fortuny, et al. "Comparative cranial osteology ofBlanus(Squamata: Amphisbaenia)." Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 185, no. 3 (December 15, 2018): 693–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zly082.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Voskoboinikova, O. S., and M. V. Nazarkin. "Comparative osteology of Cyclopsis tentacularis (Cyclopteridae, Scorpaeniformes)." Journal of Ichthyology 49, no. 1 (January 2009): 39–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s0032945209010056.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Jawad, Laith A., Ronald Fricke, and Joacim Näslund. "Comparative osteology of the family Tripterygiidae (Teleostei: Blenniiformes)." Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 98, no. 6 (April 26, 2017): 1487–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s002531541700042x.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper presents the results of a comparative study of five osteological complexes, the infraorbital bones, branchial arches, urohyal bone, interdigitation of the median fins, and the caudal fin skeleton, of some members of the fish family Tripterygiidae. Osteological characters that may prove valuable for taxonomic purposes are described, and on the basis of the material handled, their use to separate species within the family is discussed. Several formulae were developed for the distribution of the osteological complexes of the dorsal fin, dorsal and ventral caudal procurrent ray distribution, and caudal fin in the different tripterygiid species studied.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Villa, Andrea, Juan D. Daza, Aaron M. Bauer, and Massimo Delfino. "Comparative cranial osteology of European gekkotans (Reptilia, Squamata)." Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 184, no. 3 (January 17, 2018): 857–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx104.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

HOLBROOK, LUKE T. "Comparative osteology of early Tertiary tapiromorphs (Mammalia, Perissodactyla)." Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 132, no. 1 (May 2001): 1–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2001.tb02270.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Voskoboinikova, Olga S., and Mikhail Yu Zhukov. "Comparative osteology of the superfamily Congiopodoidea (Pisces: Scorpaenoidei)." Zoomorphology 140, no. 3 (August 28, 2021): 373–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00435-021-00537-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Moezzi, Sayyed Ali, Yazdan Keivany, and Benigno Elvira. "Comparative osteology of Chondrostoma orientale and C. nasus." Nova Biologica Reperta 7, no. 3 (November 1, 2020): 278–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/nbr.7.3.278.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Buckley, David, Marvalee H. Wake, and David B. Wake. "Comparative skull osteology of Karsenia koreana (Amphibia, Caudata, Plethodontidae)." Journal of Morphology 271, no. 5 (December 9, 2009): 533–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10816.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Shupeldt, R. W. "On the Comparative Osteology of the United States Columbidae." Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 59, no. 2 (August 20, 2009): 194–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1891.tb01737.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Villa, Andrea, Emanuel Tschopp, Georgios L. Georgalis, and Massimo Delfino. "Osteology, fossil record and palaeodiversity of the European lizards." Amphibia-Reptilia 38, no. 1 (2017): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685381-00003085.

Full text
Abstract:
The capability of palaeontologists to identify fossil remains of a particular group of vertebrates strongly depends on the knowledge they have of its comparative osteology and on the actual presence of diagnostic differences among the considered taxa. This could have a relevant influence on the study of palaeodiversity, since a low recognisability causes a loss of data when trying to reconstruct the history of taxa that lived on Earth in the past. Currently, more than 6000 extant species of lizards and worm lizards are known, and new ones continue to be discovered, mainly based on molecular data. But are we able to recognise this high diversity using osteology? As far as European taxa are concerned, the osteological recognisability of non-snake squamates is very low: only 31% of the extant European taxa can be identified based on their skeletal morphology. This is balanced partially by the fact that most recognisable taxa have been actually recognised in the fossil record, suggesting that the lost data are mainly due to the scarce knowledge of the comparative osteology of these reptiles and less influenced by other biases, such as taphonomic or collection biases. In this context, specimen-level phylogenetic analysis has proved to be a useful tool to identify diagnostic combinations of osteological features, at least for lacertid species, as evidenced by a case study focused on the genusLacerta.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Comparative osteology"

1

Van, den Worm Johan H. "The comparative cranial osteology of the South African Lacertilia (reptilia: Squamata)." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/70379.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (MSc)--Stellenbosch University, 1998
Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Science. Dept. of Botany & Zoology.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: There has been a long-standing need to systematically analyze and classify South African fossil Lacertilia. Although extensive assemblages of fossil lizard and amphibian material from Langebaan on the West Coast and elsewhere exist in museum collections, the fragmentary nature of the material has largely prevented in-depth analyses and identification. In this comparative study the skulls and lower jaws of 7 lizard genera, representing the six extant South African families, were disassembled and the bones analyzed individually. The aim was to compile a comparative database of each bone against which current and future fossil finds could be matched. Detailed descriptions of the isolated elements were given. The results showed that despite some intra-generic variation, unique structural differences do exist in individual bones which may be utilized in the taxonomic assessment of fragmentary fossil material.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Daar bestaan lank reeds 'n behoefte vir die sistematiese analise en klassifisering van fossielmateriaal van Suid-Afrikaanse Lacertilia. Alhoewel uitgebreide versamelings van akkedis- en amfibier-fossiele van Langebaan aan die Weskus en elders in museums bestaan, het die fragmentariese aard van die materiaal grootliks diepgaande analises en identifikasie belemmer In hierdie vergelykende studie is die skedels en onderkake van 7 akkedisgenera, wat die ses resente Suid-Afrikaanse families verteenwoordig, gedisartikuleer en elke been individueel geanaliseer. Die doel was om 'n vergelykende databasis van elke been saam te stel waarmee huidige en toekomstige fossielvondse vergelyk kan word. Gedetaileerde beskrywings van die ge'isoleerde elemente word gegee. Die resultate toon dat desondanks 'n mate van intra-generiese variasie, unieke strukturele verskille tussen individuele bene weI bestaan en dat hierdie verskille gebruik kan word om fossielfragmente taksonomies te analiseer.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Al-Hassawi, Amal M. A. "The osteology and myology of the cranio-cervical region in squamate reptiles : a comparative study." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2004. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1446505/.

Full text
Abstract:
Modem squamates (lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians) form a highly successful group of terrestrial reptiles with a range of habitats and lifestyles. Some features of their anatomy (head, limbs) are relatively well-studied, but there are significant gaps in our knowledge. The neck is one such area. It provides the mobile unit between the head and the body, serving for the attachment of the musculature to the head, the forelimb and the pharyngeal region. The mobility of the head is dependent on arrangement of such muscles and on the structure of the craniovertebral and intervertebral joints across which the muscles act. Preliminary studies have shown interesting patterns of variation in both skeletal anatomy and musculature. The aim of the project was to explore, catalogue and analyse this variation, and to find functional and/ or taxonomic explanations for it. Details of the surface morphology of bones, and the origin and insertion of muscles were recorded for Caiman, Sphenodon and squamates (including the amphisbaenian Diplometopon and the snake Trimeresurus). Where possible, comparisons were also made within and between taxa to determine levels of inter- and intraspecific variation, as well as variation between genera. Several limbless or limb-reduced taxa were compared to assess levels of convergence in these forms. The results of the study suggest that some craniocervical characters may be phylogenetically useful although there is a high level of variation within and between species. Craniocervical characters generally support the monophyly of Lepidosauria, Squamata and Sderoglossa (all non-iguanian squamates); and major clades like Iguarda, Gekkota, Sdncomorpha and Angtiimorpha. Also supported are groups like Acrodonta (agamids + chamaeleons) and Scincoidea; and families like Chamaeleonidae and Varanidae. Within Squamata, craniocervical features seem to place Gekkota closer to Anguimorpha than Sdncomorpha. Varanid lizards and snakes (Trimeresurus) share muscular features (origin and extension of longus colli in the craniocervical region), although varanids themselves are distinctive in their neck morphology. Amongst the limbless taxa examined, the amphisbaenian Diplometopon and the snake Trimeresurus had a spedalised neck morphology which differs from that of lizards, but the craniocervical features of Diplometojjon resembled those of gekkotans and limbed anguimorphs (e.g. varanids) more than sdncomorphs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Henderson, Anna Catrin. "Studies on interactions among Xenopus taxa using comparative osteology and other methods : an evolutionary perspective." Thesis, University of Bristol, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/1983/8ba52130-eeca-4b4c-9722-2129646b12b1.

Full text
Abstract:
The past thirty years have seen a tripling in the number of Xenopus species recognized. The complexp atterno f speciesd istributiond emonstrateadc rossth es ub-Sahararna nger eflectse cological constraintsi mposedb y climate conditionst hroughoutt he Pleistocenea, nd highlights a numbero f areas of specific biogeographic interest. Although previous application of comparative osteology as a method for phylogenetic investigation at the species level in Anura has been limited, the approach, adopted in this study, has proven to be highly informative in its application to specific taxonomic studies. An overview of osteologicalc haractersin the type specieso f the genusX enopusi s presented for the first time and forms the basis for subsequent osteology-based species descriptions. Results implicate two tetraploids, X 1. victorianus and X fraseri in the hybrid origin of an octoploid species pair, X. wittei and X. vestitus in the Central African highlands. Existing ambiguity surrounding the taxonomic distinction between two cryptic taxa, also living in these highlands, XL victorianus and X 1. bunyoniensis is considered. Osteologically, the two are distinct. Corroboration for the sub-division of X. muelleri into eastern and western forms is provided by studies on comparative osteology and mating-call, amongst others. The taxonomic significance of thesef indings is overshadowedh owever,b y evidenceo f widespreadh ybridization and introgression with distantly relatedX . 1.l aevis in the southeasternp art of the X. muelleri range. Although only two species are currently known from Ethiopia, evidence of morphology indicates that museum collections of X. clivii comprise at least two distinct forms, one appearing to be intermediate between the two Xenopus sub-genera. Furthermore, osteology reveals that X largeni also straddles this taxonomic boundary, casting doubt on the robustness of this phylogenetic division. Results are consistent with recent findings from molecular-based phylogenies, qualifying the use of comparative osteology as an informative method for investigation of evolutionary interactions
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Schaaf, Lisa Nicole. "Comparative Morphometrics of the Sacral Vertebra in Aneides (Caudata: Plethodontidae)." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2010. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1703.

Full text
Abstract:
The genus Aneides (Caudata: Plethodontidae) is an arboreal salamander with a prehensile tail and a distribution that spans North America. It is hypothesized that adaptations for arboreality will be visible in the osteology of the sacral vertebra either by qualitative analysis or linear and morphometric analysis in comparison with other plethodontid salamanders. This study demonstrates that while qualitative and quantitative analyses are successful at making genus-level distinctions between taxa, identification to lower taxonomic levels remains inconclusive. Linear morphometrics and dorsal Procrustes landmarks were the most successful metrics to identify known taxa. Two unidentified fossil salamander sacral vertebrae from Oregon Caves National Monument are examined with the same techniques and are tentatively identified as Hydromantes based on qualitative similarities to modern Hydromantes specimens, as the quantitative analyses were unable to confidently diagnose the unknown specimens.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mattox, George Mendes Taliaferro. "Estudo filogenético de Characinae (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae)." Universidade de São Paulo, 2010. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/41/41133/tde-29062010-110255/.

Full text
Abstract:
Um dos principais desafios na ictiologia Neotropical moderna refere-se à sistemática de Characidae, uma família com aproximadamente 950 espécies, dois terços da diversidade de Characiformes. Recentemente, tem sido sugerido que subunidades de Characidae sejam primeiramente estudadas e reconhecidas visando um melhor entendimento da sistemática da família como um todo. Characinae é uma destas subunidades que guarda especial importância por incluir Charax, gênero-tipo de Characidae e Characiformes. Doze gêneros e 79 espécies têm sido incluídos em Characinae, mas a subfamília ainda não havia sido foco de estudo filogenético. No presente trabalho, 35 espécies de todos os gêneros de Characinae e 29 representantes de outras linhagens de Characiformes foram incluídas em uma matriz com 151 caracteres provenientes do estudo comparado da morfologia externa, miologia e osteologia, submetida a duas análises cladísticas. Uma delas, sem incluir o gênero Priocharax, resultou em 50 árvores igualmente parcimoniosas (L=697, IC=0.29, IR=0.73). No cladograma de consenso estrito, Characinae como tradicionalmente reconhecido não é um grupo monofilético. Os gêneros usualmente atribuídos à subfamília resultaram em dois clados separados, cada qual mais proximamente relacionado a diferentes subunidades de Characiformes. Sete gêneros formam o primeiro clado (Phenacogaster ((Charax Roeboides) (Acanthocharax (Cynopotamus (Acestrocephalus Galeocharax))))), ao qual o nome Characinae é restrito. Ele é sustentado por onze sinapomorfias não ambíguas e é mais relacionado em uma politomia a outros gêneros de Characidae (i.e., Astyanax, Cheirodon, Gymnocorymbus, Hyphessobrycon, Odontostilbe e Tetragonopterus). O segundo clado inclui a tribo Heterocharacini (Lonchogenys (Heterocharax Hoplocharax)) como grupo-irmão de Gnathocharax. Seis sinapomorfias não ambíguas sustentam o monofiletismo deste clado que, por sua vez, é mais proximamente relacionado a um clado formado por Roestes e Gilbertolus, com base em oito sinapomorfias não ambíguas. O resultado da análise não corrobora a hipótese de relacionamento próximo entre Roestes e Gilbertolus e Cynodontinae. A inclusão do gênero Priocharax, que compreende duas espécies miniatura (100 árvores, L=697, IC=0.29, IR=0.73) sugere que ele é mais relacionado aos Heterocharacini com base na morfologia do pseudotímpano, aparelho de Weber e esqueleto caudal. No entanto, as profundas modificações de sua anatomia possivelmente relacionadas a eventos de truncamento ontogenético dificultam um melhor entendimento a cerca das relações deste gênero. Um estudo anatômico detalhado de Priocharax pretende fornecer evidências adicionais no que se refere às suas relações filogenéticas. Com base na hipótese de relações obtida através da análise, é proposta uma nova classificação de Characinae e Roestinae
One of the main challenges in modern Neotropical ichthyology refers to the systematics of the Characidae, a family with approximately 950 species, two-thirds of the diversity in Characiformes. It has been suggested that subunits of the Characidae should first be studied and recognized for a better understanding of the family as a whole. Characinae is one such subunit with special importance for including Charax, type-genus of the Characidae and Characiformes. Twelve genera and 79 species have been included in the Characinae, but the subfamily still lacked a phylogenetic diagnosis. In the present study, 35 species of all genera of the Characinae and 29 representing other lineages within Characiformes were included in a matrix with 151 characters from external morphology, myology and osteology, submitted to two cladistic analyses. One of them (excluding Priocharax from the dataset) resulted in 50 equally most parsimonious trees (L=697, IC=0.29, IR=0.73). In the strict consensus cladogram, Characinae as traditionally recognized is not a monophyletic group. Genera usually assigned to the subfamily resulted in two separate clades, each more related to different lineages in Characiformes. Seven genera form the first clade (Phenacogaster ((Charax Roeboides) (Acanthocharax (Cynopotamus (Acestrocephalus Galeocharax))))) to which the name Characinae is restricted. It is supported by eleven non-ambiguous synapomorphies and is more related in a politomy to other genera of the Characidae (i.e., Astyanax, Cheirodon, Gymnocorymbus, Hyphessobrycon, Odontostilbe and Tetragonopterus). The second clade includes the tribe Heterocharacini (Lonchogenys (Heterocharax Hoplocharax)) as the sister-group of Gnathocharax. Six non-ambiguous synapomorphies support this clade, which is more related to a clade formed by Roestes and Gilbertolus based on eight non-ambiguous synapomorphies. Results presented in this study do not corroborate a close relationship between Roestes and Gilbertolus and the Cynodontinae. Inclusion of the genus Priocharax, with two miniature species (100 trees, L=697, CI=0.29, RI=0.73) suggests that it is more related to the Heterocharacini based on the morphology of the pseudotympanum, Weberian apparatus and caudal skeleton. The profound modifications in its anatomy possibly related to ontogenetic truncations, however, obscure a better understanding on the relations of this genus. A detailed anatomical study of Priocharax is being designed intended to provide additional evidence regarding its phylogenetic relationships. A new classification of the Characinae and the Roestinae is proposed based on the phylogenetic hypothesis obtained herein
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Watanabe, Junya. "Comparative ontogeny of avian limb skeleton: implications for ontogenetic ageing and evolutionary variability, with special emphasis on the evolution of avian flightlessness." Kyoto University, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/217730.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hukelova, Zuzana. "Comparative osteoarchaeological perspectives on health and lifestyle of Neolithic, Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age populations from Slovakia, Moravia and Bohemia." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/22958.

Full text
Abstract:
Despite the potential of a biocultural methodology, osteology and archaeology are often approached separately in some parts of Central Europe. This osteoarchaeological thesis presents a rare comparative study of populations occupying modern-day Slovakia, Moravia, and Bohemia from the Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age (EBA). By examining skeletal indicators of health and lifestyle, it aims to contribute to bioarchaeological research within the study region. It also provides new insights into a series of important sites where no osteological evaluation of skeletal remains have previously been performed. Human remains from thirty-four sites in Slovakia, Moravia and Bohemia, 152 adults and 136 subadults, were analysed. Demographic, pathological and metric data were recorded and evaluated, and compared with previously published data for contemporaneous populations in order to create a more comprehensive representation of the populations in the area. The results suggest several differences between the Neolithic and the following periods, mostly as regards health status. Higher dietary and environmental stress was indicated in the Neolithic period, as suggested by lower mortality peak (especially of females and subadults) and about 5cm shorter stature, and generally worse health status of Neolithic population when compared to the Chalcolithic and EBA individuals. The Neolithic is also the only period where females were more numerous than males. Such a trend is quite common in the Neolithic of the study region. This may be a result of increased migration of Neolithic females, as raids for wives are suggested to have been practiced. As indicated by both the osteological and archaeological record, one of the sites examined, Svodín, could have been a site of contemporary elites and their family members. Chalcolithic populations revealed differences in cranial shape, being mesocephalic (medium-headed) or brachycephalic (short-headed), whereas both the Neolithic and the EBA populations were dolichocephalic (long-headed). Differences in male and female cranial features suggest a possible mixing of indigenous and incoming populations. Such results may contribute to the ongoing discussion about the ‘foreignness‘ of Chalcolithic Bell Beaker people in the area. Traumatic lesions suggest that males were more physically active than females in all three periods, including violent encounters. Even though violence was recorded in all three periods, especially in the western part of the region, and the intensity and brutality of the assaults appears to increase in the Chalcolithic and culminating in the EBA. In addition, poorer health status of EBA children was recorded, possibly related to more marked social differentiation in the period. In general, poorer health was implied for the prehistoric populations of today’s Slovakia. The results of this study can serve as the basis for future research and contribute to a more comprehensive image of lifestyle and development of prehistoric populations in the study area.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Wragg, Graham. "The comparative biology of Fluttering shearwater and Hutton's shearwater and their relationship to other shearwater species." Lincoln College, University of Canterbury, 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/10182/1635.

Full text
Abstract:
The discovery and taxonomic history of fluttering shearwater (Puffinus gavia (Forster) and Hutton's shearwater (Puffinus huttoni Mathews) are reviewed. Taxonomic theory, where appropriate to this thesis, is discussed. The external morphology of P. gavia and P. huttoni is compared. No single external measurement or plumage character separates more than 60% of birds examined. The best system of identification is to compare the ratio of different body parts within an individual bird. The distribution of P. gavia and P. huttoni is compared. Hutton's shearwater feeds further out to sea and it is believed to be a migrant species wintering in north west Australian waters. The fluttering shearwater is believed to be a semi-migrant species with only the juveniles spending time in south east Australia. The red cell enzymes of P. gavia, P. huttoni and P. griseus are compared. There are differences in two esterase loci between gavia and huttoni, while P. griseus is more distantly related. Nei's genetic identity values are calculated. The systematic value of electrophoretic data is discussed. The relationship of an undescribed subfossil shearwater to P. gavia and P. huttoni is discussed. An outgroup analysis to other shearwater species is carried out according to phylogenetic (cladistic) theory. The subfossil shearwater is most closely related to the fluttering shearwater, and these two form a sister group to Hutton's shearwater. These three species are a sister group of P. opisthomelas. The relationship between the many P. assimilis subspecies, the black-backed Manx shearwaters, and the gavia, huttoni and opisthomelas group was not resolved. Puffinus nativitatis is more closely related to the Manx and the little shearwaters than to the P. griseus, P. tenuirostris group.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Zirkle, Dexter. "The Development of the Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine: A Comparative Analysis Among Hominids and African Apes." Kent State University / OhioLINK, 2015. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1427206046.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Tai, Jui-Hung, and 戴睿紘. "Comparative osteology of the tribe epinephelini(Serranidae)." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/p8p6yn.

Full text
Abstract:
碩士
國立臺灣海洋大學
水產養殖學系
107
Most of the groupers(Epinephelini) are high economic and species-rich assemblage species, however the classification is controversial. Research of epinephelinae taxonomy nowadays are often using molecular or morphology phylogenetics, only few researches using osteology to study hatchery‐reared grouper’s osteological development. The result between molecular and morphology have some differents, therefore we use osteology to examine the classification of epinephelini. In our research, we collected 7 genus 37 species of epinephelini and 2 species of Odontanthias for outgroup, chose 37 bone characters in 10 bones to do similarity analysis, result shows morphology of bones is stable in same species, using multiple bone characters at the same time can be useful in grouper classification. In this thesis, we reveal Aethaloperca shares same character in preopercle, subopercle, interopercle, maxillary, urohyal and the palatine teeth ratio with Cephalopholis, we suggest that Aethaloperca should be allocated to Cephalopholis. Although Cromileptes and Anyperodon are in the same clade with Epinephelus, however the similarity is too low, we suggest that Cromileptes and Anyperodon exclude from Epinephelus, retain in a monotypic genus. Also we show 37 species of epinephelini skull’s photo to compare in the future.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Comparative osteology"

1

J, Crabtree Pam, ed. Comparative osteology: A laboratory and field guide of common North American animals. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Pilleri, Georg. Recent sirenia in Swiss collections: With special reference to osteology and comparative neurology. Ostermundigen (Berne): Brain Anatomy Institute, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

France, Diane L. Human and nonhuman bone identification: A concise field guide. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Tomek, Teresa. The comparative osteology of European corvids (Aves: Corvidae): With a key to the identification of their skeletal elements. Kraków: Instytutu Systematyki i Ewolucji Zwierząt PAN, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Peters, Joris. Comparative postcranial osteology of hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus), scimitar oryx (Oryx dammah), and addax (Addax nasomaculatus), with notes on the osteometry of gemsbok (Oryx gazella) and Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx). Tervuren, België: Koninklijk Museum voor Midden-Afrika, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Comparative Osteology. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/c2010-0-68475-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Krolikowski, F. John, Gina O. Hart, Steven A. Symes, and Karen Reuter. Atlas of Comparative Forensic Osteology. CRC, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Forensic Archaeology: The Application of Comparative Excavation Methods and Recording Systems. Archaeopress, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ramos, Elizabeth, and Catalina Zorro. Comparative osteology. Between Trachemys callirostris callirostris (Colombian Slider) and Chelonoidis carbonaria (Red-Footed Tortoise). Universidad de los Andes, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.7440/2013.20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gaffney, Eugene S. The Comparative Osteology of the Triassic Turtle Proganochelys (Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, No 194). Amer Museum of Natural History, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Comparative osteology"

1

Gilchrist, Rachel, Sarah Vooght, and Roger Soames. "Comparative Osteology." In Forensic Anthropology, 319–28. Taylor & Francis, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b10727-11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Adams, Bradley, and Pam Crabtree. "Introduction, Scope of Book, and Credits." In Comparative Osteology, 1–9. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-388437-4.00001-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Adams, Bradley, and Pam Crabtree. "Crania." In Comparative Osteology, 11–29. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-388437-4.00002-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Adams, Bradley, and Pam Crabtree. "Humeri." In Comparative Osteology, 31–50. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-388437-4.00003-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Adams, Bradley, and Pam Crabtree. "Radii and Ulnae." In Comparative Osteology, 51–70. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-388437-4.00004-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Adams, Bradley, and Pam Crabtree. "Femora." In Comparative Osteology, 71–90. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-388437-4.00005-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Adams, Bradley, and Pam Crabtree. "Tibiae." In Comparative Osteology, 91–110. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-388437-4.00006-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Adams, Bradley, and Pam Crabtree. "Human ( Homo sapiens )." In Comparative Osteology, 111–43. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-388437-4.00007-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Adams, Bradley, and Pam Crabtree. "Horse ( Equus caballus )." In Comparative Osteology, 145–70. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-388437-4.00008-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Adams, Bradley, and Pam Crabtree. "Cow ( Bos taurus and Bos indicus )." In Comparative Osteology, 171–88. Elsevier, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-388437-4.00009-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Comparative osteology' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography