Academic literature on the topic 'Comparative phraseological unit'

The textbook is intended for the formation of linguistic and cultural competence of students based on a comparative analysis of the phraseological fund of English and Russian languages in an extralinguistic aspect, as well as for the development of foreign language competence through the use of English phraseological units in speech.
 Meets the requirements of the federal state educational standards of higher education of the latest generation.
 For students of various philological areas of bachelor's and master's degree preparation.

The textbook is devoted to theoretical and practical issues of studying the Old Slavic language, which appeared in the middle of the IX century and had a significant impact on the development of Slavic cultures in general and the emergence of book-written Slavic languages on a national basis in particular. The manual includes educational and methodological materials on the analysis of phonetics, morphology, vocabulary, syntax; texts of the Old Slavic language from glagolitic and Cyrillic monuments, tasks for the analysis of texts, a dictionary.
 The educational and methodological material

An important area of contemporary linguistic research concerns language as a reflection of national mentality, worldview, and culture, with specific focus on the consideration of linguistic and cultural categories in non-related languages. The study's object is the precedent phenomena (PP) present in both English and Ukrainian languages, and the research subject is the process of PP transitioning into the phraseological resources of both languages. The purpose of the research is to analyse the ways of transition of the PP (precedent name, situation and statement) into the phraseological fund of the English and Ukrainian languages. The resolution of a research problem dictates the presentation logic of the studied material within the paper. The aims of this study include defining a precedent phenomenon, outlining and detailing the stages of PP transition into phraseological funds of the English and Ukrainian languages, and exposing the specifics of precedent phenomena phraseologicalisation with regards to structural differences. The study methodology is grounded in the descriptive, transformational analysis, component analysis, and comparative methods. These are employed to distinguish between the universal and national precedent names, and to identify similarities and differences in the mechanism by which the PP transitions into the phraseological funds of the English and Ukrainian languages. The analysis of phraseological units with a precedent component indicates that prevalent precedent phenomena originating from mythological, biblical, ancient texts, and prior occurrences are primarily phraseologized, forming the "universal" cognitive foundation. However, the subject of the study is nationally precedent-setting РPs (which are known to an average representative of the Anglo-American or Ukrainian linguistic community and included in the national cognitive base) as representatives of national culture. The research material presents phraseological units of the English and Ukrainian languages containing a component-precedent phenomenon, totalling 125 units (76 units in English and 49 in Ukrainian). The results of the study show that the process of transition of precedent phenomena into the phraseological fund of the language takes place in two stages. First of all, there appears a certain unit (a name, a text) that is fixed in the language and to which native speakers refer repeatedly in the future. A text or a name thus becomes an element of the cognitive base of an average representative of a given linguistic community, i.e., a precedent phenomenon. In the second stage, PP phraseologisation takes place; such a unit is included in the phraseological fund of the language, accordingly it becomes a phraseologism, while remaining a precedent phenomenon. A precedent name (PN) is an individual name associated with a famous text or precedent-setting situation. The structure of a precedent name comprises differential features (the basis of PN perception) and attributes (periphery). The meaning of a phraseological unit with a component-precedent name evolves from a differential feature that embodies the object's characteristics (personality, appearance) or becomes relevant owing to a precedent situation. A precedent situation is an "ideal" situation that took place in real life (historical precedent situation) or one that belongs to the virtual reality of man-made art. The cognitive base stores a set of differential features of a precedent situation, universal for all representatives of a given linguistic and cultural community. Minimised knowledge of a specific situation (historical or virtual), compared to the system of evaluation of ethnicity, becomes the basis for the formation of phraseological units built on the basis of precedent situations. A precedent statement is a product of speech and thought activity, an integral and self-sufficient unit that can be presented as: 1) a precedent text (or part of it), for example, children's poems, proverbs; 2) a linguistic unit (phrase, sentence) related to a precedent situation. Precedent-setting expressions are fixed in the phraseological fund by metaphorising the direct meaning and preserving knowledge about the precedent-setting phenomenon. Practical implications. The practical significance of the work is determined by the fact that the conclusions formulated as a result of the study can be used for further study of precedent phenomena, and the proposed methodology for the study of PP can be useful for the analysis of other linguistic and cultural categories. The materials of the work can be used in the courses "General Linguistics", "English Lexicology and Stylistics", "Linguistic Studies", special courses and special seminars on "Comparative Linguistics", "Intercultural Communication", as well as in lexicographic practice when compiling dictionaries of precedent phenomena. Value/оriginality. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the new theoretical positions of linguocultural studies on precedent phenomena. The characteristics of the onomastic material in phraseological funds and the problems related to the essential features of the nature of precedent phenomena have been further developed.

The study of phraseology is of great culturological interest, since any language contains an extensive number of phraseological units which contain unique information about the culture and way of life of different peoples One of the most important phenomena that influenced the Christian world was the texts of the Holy Scriptures, which, undoubtedly, was reflected in the language in the form of nationally characteristic phraseological units. This chapter provides a comparative analysis of phraseological units mentioning Bible characters in two Slavic languages - Serbian and Kashubian

The paper provides a comparative analysis of the existing bilingual Russian-Hebrew phraseological dictionaries, describes the main differences between them (the number of phraseological units, sources of material). The main conclusion is that the Big Russian Hebrew phraseological dictionary corresponding to the modern requirements of phraseography is needed.

The article is devoted to a comparative description of the phraseological picture of the world of two different languages-Russian and Adyghe. The empirical analysis has allowed to establish four basic ways in which the matching of phraseological units of Russian and Adyghe languages: full matching (equivalent), incomplete compliance (analogues), lack of correspondences in the Russian language, the lack of correspondences in the Circassian language. The analysis confirmed that in the phraseological picture of the world of the compared languages, equivalent phraseological units are found to a gr

A working mechanism during the comparative analysis of phraseological units and paroemias (proverbs and aphorisms) at the classes of Russian as foreign language with English speaking learners is presented in the article. While working in the audience, the attention is being paid to the comparative analysis of phraseological units and paroemias in Russian and foreign students’ native language from a semantical point of view. Such concepts and ideas as family, homeland, work / service / profession, studying, friendship, human flaws and virtues, represented in the proverbs and paroemias, are bein

A working mechanism during the comparative analysis of phraseological units and paroemias (proverbs and aphorisms) at the classes of Russian as foreign language with English speaking learners is presented in the article. While working in the audience, the attention is being paid to the comparative analysis of phraseological units and paroemias in Russian and foreign students’ native language from a semantical point of view. Such concepts and ideas as family, homeland, work / service / profession, studying, friendship, human flaws and virtues, represented in the proverbs and paroemias, are bein

This article is devoted to the study of similarities and differences in the perception of the spiritual identity of the Russian and Chinese ethnos on the material of phraseological lexicon with a numeral component in the lingua-cultural aspect. In Russian linguistic culture, the number "one" represents God. In the Chinese phraseological lexicon with the considered component, Confucius' concepts of governing the country and some basic Buddhist ideas are observed. The comparative analysis shows a significant similarity in the semantic structure of the phraseological lexicon of the two languages.

The accumulated experience of lexicographic description of stable comparisons of the Russian language is an incentive for the creation of educational Russian- Chinese dictionaries. A condition for successful lexicographic work is a detailed comparative analysis of stable comparative units, based on the developed by Yu.P. Solodub typology of interlingual phraseological equivalents.

The studied dialect phraseological units are interesting structures that are widespread in the dialect environment of Goris and are not included in dialect dictionaries. Among them, nominal forms are inferior in number to verbal phrases. The most common phraseological units are "to make" a verb, which have stabilized into a productive past form and express unique semantic nuances. Studying the material with the help of comparative analysis allowed us to compare and analyze the commonality of expressions found in the Goris and Artsakh dialects, at the same time emphasizing the unique semantic a