Relevant bibliographies by topics / Compomer (Dyract AP")

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses

Academic literature on the topic 'Compomer (Dyract AP")'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 3 June 2025
Last updated: 31 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Compomer (Dyract AP").'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Compomer (Dyract AP")"

1

Demirci, M., E. Yildiz, and Ö. Uysal. "Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Different Treatment Approaches Using a Microfilled Resin Composite and a Compomer in Class III Cavities: Two-year Results." Operative Dentistry 33, no. 1 (2008): 7–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/07-34.

Full text
Abstract:
Clinical Relevance For two years, the three restoration/adhesive combinations used in this study (Dyract AP/Prime & Bond NT with NRC pretreatment, Dyract AP/Prime & Bond NT with phosphoric acid pretreatment and Filtek A110/Single Bond) exhibited very good clinical performance in Class III cavities. Clinically simplified systems and handling characteristics of materials may effect their clinical performance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Vanga, V. Narsimha. "Effect of Cola on Surface Microhardness and Marginal Integrity of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and Compomer Restoration – An in vitro St." PJSR 4, no. 2 (2011): 34–40. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8273054.

Full text
Abstract:
This study was carried out to evaluate the surface microhardness and marginal integrity of a resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer after immersing them in a cola soft drink for variable periods of time. The study was conducted in two parts. Forty two standard class V cavities were prepared on extracted human premolars, restored with Dyract AP and Fuji II LC and evaluated for marginal integrity. Forty two circular discs (CDs) were prepared with Dyract AP and Fuji II LC to test microhardness. These specimens were immersed in a cola drink under low, medium and high immersion regimes. Margin
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rodrigues Filho, Leonardo Eloy, Luis Antônio dos Santos Burger, Silvia Kenshima, José Roberto de Oliveira Bauer, Igor Studart Medeiros, and Antonio Muench. "Effect of light-activation methods and water storage on the flexural strength of two composite resins and a compomer." Brazilian Oral Research 20, no. 2 (2006): 143–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242006000200010.

Full text
Abstract:
The present study evaluated the flexural strength of three composite resins recommended for direct esthetic restorations: a polyacid modified composite (Dyract AP), a unimodal composite resin (Filtek Z250) and a hybrid composite resin (Point 4). The variation factors, apart from the type of composite resin, were the light activation method and the water storage period. The composite resins were light-cured in continuous mode (40 s, 500 mW/cm²) or in ramp mode (0-800 mW/cm² for 10 s followed by 30 s at 800 mW/cm²) and stored for 24 hours or 30 days in distilled water at 37°C. The data were anal
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Yalcin, Filiz. "The Weight Change of Various Light-Cured Restorative Materials Stored in Water." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 6, no. 2 (2005): 72–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-6-2-72.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This study investigated weight changes of seven different light-cured composite restorative materials, one polyacid glass ionomer compomer, and one light-cured glass-ionomer cement following short-term and long-term storage in water. Two packable composites, three universal (hybrid) composites, one microglass composite, one polyacid glass ionomer resin composite (compomer), one microhybrid low-viscosity (flowable) composite, and one light cured glass ionomer composite cement were evaluated in this study. The weight changes of these specimens were measured daily (short-term storage), a
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Saleem, Dr Sazan Sherdil. "Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of esthetic restorative materials." Mustansiria Dental Journal 14, no. 1 (2018): 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v14i1.751.

Full text
Abstract:
The present study was aimed to evaluate and compare the compressive strength ofconventional glass ionomer cement with resin modified glass ionomer, compomer andmicrohybrid composite. A total of 40 specimens of esthetic restorative materials werefabricated using customized cylindrical teflon mould measuring 6mm height and 4mmdiameter and were grouped with ten specimens in each group, Group I: Conventionalglass ionomer cement (Fuji II). Group II: Resin modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC).Group III: Compomer (Dyract AP) and Group IV: Microhybrid composite resin(Tetric Ceram).They were covered wit
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Daou, Maha, Bruno Tavernier, and Jean-Marc Meyer. "Two-Year Clinical Evaluation of Three Restorative Materials in Primary Molars." Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 34, no. 1 (2009): 53–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.34.1.h4p6141065388h0h.

Full text
Abstract:
A variety of alternatives to amalgam are now available for use in Class I and Class II restorations in primary teeth, including glass ionomer cements, compomers and resin modified glass ionomer cements(RMGIC). Objectives: This study evaluated the two-year clinical performance of three restorative dental materials: A resin modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji IILC), a compomer (Dyract AP) and a high viscosity glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX), in primary molars of pediatric patients with high caries risk activity and compared these results to those reported for amalgam restorations. Study design: O
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Mansuri, Samir, Abdul Mujeeb, Seema Abid Hussain, and Kausar Ramaswamy. "In vitro Evaluation of Topical Fluoride ph and their Effect on Surface Hardness of Composite Resin-based Restorative Materials." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 15, no. 2 (2014): 190–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1513.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT Aim The aim of the study was to correlate the pH and fluoride ion uptake with surface hardness of composite resin based restorative materials after topical fluoride application. Methodology Forty disks of each of test materials Composite (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), Resin modified glass ionomer (Vitremer) and Compomer (Dyract AP) were made and ten disks of each material were placed in different test solutions – 1.23% APF gel, Sodium fluoride mouth rinse, 0.9% neutral fluoride and distilled water (Control group). After 36 hours of immersion, specimens were subjected to m
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Shenvi, S., V. Shivanna, K. R. Jadhav, M. Seal, A. Praveen, and A. Khaitan. "Comparative evaluation of fluoride release among four commercially available dental restorative materials: An In-Vitro study." Endodontics Today 23, no. 1 (2025): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.36377/et-0077.

Full text
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION. Several fluoride-containing dental restoratives are currently available, including glass ionomers (GIC), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers), composites, and amalgams. The fluoride release capabilities of these materials differ due to their matrices and setting mechanisms, which in turn influence their antibacterial and cariostatic properties. Glass ionomer cements are particularly favored for their chemical bonding and fluoride release. However, their limitations include water sensitivity and reduced wear resistance, leadin
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Guler, Mehmet Sami. "The stress distribution of different types of restorative materials in primary molar." Open Chemistry 20, no. 1 (2022): 1451–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/chem-2022-0240.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The aim of this finite element analysis study is to evaluate the stress distributions of different types of restorative materials at Class I cavity in the primary molar. The non-cracked caries-free primary mandibular second molar that is extracted for orthodontic reasons is used to create a three-dimensional model. Two models were prepared as Model 1: the tooth model without restoration (control group) and Model 2: the tooth model with Class I restoration. Five different types of restorative materials were tested in Model 2 (resin modified glass ionomer [Fuji II LC], compomer [Dyract
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Al-Jazairy, Yousra Hussain, and Ahmed A. El-Hejazi. "The Color Differences Between Different Thicknesses of Resin Veneered Over Amalgam." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 6, no. 4 (2005): 38–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-6-4-38.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Statement of Problem Composites and compomers are popular in dental practice. However, little is known about their esthetic appearance as veneering restorative materials over amalgam restorations. Purpose This in vitro study was designed to assess the color differences of composite and compomer restorative materials, placed in thicknesses of 1 mm and 2 mm over amalgam. Material and Methods Thirty six cylindrical Teflon molds were filled with amalgam (13 mm diameter, 2 mm thickness) and stored at 37°C and 100% relative humidity for 7 days. Nine veneers (for each thickness of 1 and 2 mm
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Compomer (Dyract AP")"

1

Mustafa, Duaa Ezzedin Ibrahim. "Randomised clinical trial of four dental restorative materials (silver amalgam 'Dispersalloy', compomer 'Dyract AP', resin modified glass-ionomer 'Fuji IL LC' and Vitremer') placed in children." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2005. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1445712/.

Full text
Abstract:
This study measures the one and two-year survival rates of restorations used to restore occlusal and approximal cavities of primary teeth, and occlusal cavities in the first permanent molars and premolars of children. Restorations were carried with / or without the use of local anaesthesia. The materials used were 'Dispersalloy', 'Dyract AP', 'Fuji II LC and 'Vitremer'. The unit of study was the individual tooth. A total of 288 restorations were placed and the teeth were randomly allocated to one of the four restorative materials. Following a standardised inclusion criteria, two groups of chil
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Compomer (Dyract AP")' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography