Academic literature on the topic 'Computational protein design'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Computational protein design.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Computational protein design"
Kraemer-Pecore, Christina M., Andrew M. Wollacott, and John R. Desjarlais. "Computational protein design." Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 5, no. 6 (December 2001): 690–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1367-5931(01)00267-8.
Full textStreet, Arthur G., and Stephen L. Mayo. "Computational protein design." Structure 7, no. 5 (May 1999): R105—R109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80062-8.
Full textMacDonald, James T., and Paul S. Freemont. "Computational protein design with backbone plasticity." Biochemical Society Transactions 44, no. 5 (October 15, 2016): 1523–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bst20160155.
Full textSchreiber, Gideon, and Sarel J. Fleishman. "Computational design of protein–protein interactions." Current Opinion in Structural Biology 23, no. 6 (December 2013): 903–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2013.08.003.
Full textKortemme, Tanja, and David Baker. "Computational design of protein–protein interactions." Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 8, no. 1 (February 2004): 91–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.12.008.
Full textKundert, Kale, and Tanja Kortemme. "Computational design of structured loops for new protein functions." Biological Chemistry 400, no. 3 (February 25, 2019): 275–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2018-0348.
Full textFrappier, Vincent, and Amy E. Keating. "Data-driven computational protein design." Current Opinion in Structural Biology 69 (August 2021): 63–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2021.03.009.
Full textSamish, Ilan, Christopher M. MacDermaid, Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar, and Jeffery G. Saven. "Theoretical and Computational Protein Design." Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 62, no. 1 (May 5, 2011): 129–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103509.
Full textColuzza, Ivan. "Computational protein design: a review." Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, no. 14 (February 27, 2017): 143001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/aa5c76.
Full textDesjarlais, John R., and Stephen L. Mayo. "Editorial overview: Computational protein design." Current Opinion in Structural Biology 12, no. 4 (August 2002): 429–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00343-3.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Computational protein design"
Traore, Seydou. "Computational approaches toward protein design." Thesis, Toulouse, INSA, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014ISAT0033/document.
Full textComputational Protein Design (CPD) is a very young research field which aims at providing predictive tools to complementprotein engineering. Indeed, in addition to the theoretical understanding of fundamental properties and function of proteins,protein engineering has important applications in a broad range of fields, including biomedical applications, biotechnology,nanobiotechnology and the design of green reagents. CPD seeks at accelerating the design of proteins with wanted propertiesby enabling the exploration of larger sequence space while limiting the financial and human costs at experimental level.To succeed this endeavor, CPD requires three ingredients to be appropriately conceived: 1) a realistic modeling of the designsystem; 2) an accurate definition of objective functions for the target biochemical function or physico-chemical property; 3)and finally an efficient optimization framework to handle large combinatorial sizes.In this thesis, we addressed CPD problems with a special focus on combinatorial optimization. In a first series of studies, weapplied for the first time the Cost Function Network optimization framework to solve CPD problems and found that incomparison to other existing methods, it brings several orders of magnitude speedup on a wide range of real CPD instancesthat include the stability design of proteins, protein-protein and protein-ligand complexes. A tailored criterion to define themutation space of residues was also introduced in order to constrain output sequences to those expected by natural evolutionthrough the integration of some structural properties of amino acids in the protein environment. The developed methods werefinally integrated into a CPD-dedicated software in order to facilitate its accessibility to the scientific community
Wood, Christopher Robin Wells. "Computational design of parameterisable protein folds." Thesis, University of Bristol, 2016. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.715832.
Full textHong, Eun-Jong 1975. "Exact rotamer optimization for computational protein design." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/44421.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 235-244).
The search for the global minimum energy conformation (GMEC) of protein side chains is an important computational challenge in protein structure prediction and design. Using rotamer models, the problem is formulated as a NP-hard optimization problem. Dead-end elimination (DEE) methods combined with systematic A* search (DEE/A*) have proven useful, but may not be strong enough as we attempt to solve protein design problems where a large number of similar rotamers is eligible and the network of interactions between residues is dense. In this thesis, we present an exact solution method, named BroMAP (branch-and-bound rotamer optimization using MAP estimation), for such protein design problems. The design goal of BroMAP is to be able to expand smaller search trees than conventional branch-and-bound methods while performing only a moderate amount of computation in each node, thereby reducing the total running time. To achieve that, BroMAP attempts reduction of the problem size within each node through DEE and elimination by energy lower bounds from approximate maximurn-a-posteriori (MAP) estimation. The lower bounds are also exploited in branching and subproblem selection for fast discovery of strong upper bounds. Our computational results show that BroMAP tends to be faster than DEE/A* for large protein design cases. BroMAP also solved cases that were not solvable by DEE/A* within the maximum allowed time, and did not incur significant disadvantage for cases where DEE/A* performed well. In the second part of the thesis, we explore several ways of improving the energy lower bounds by using Lagrangian relaxation. Through computational experiments, solving the dual problem derived from cyclic subgraphs, such as triplets, is shown to produce stronger lower bounds than using the tree-reweighted max-product algorithm.
(cont.) In the second approach, the Lagrangian relaxation is tightened through addition of violated valid inequalities. Finally, we suggest a way of computing individual lower bounds using the dual method. The preliminary results from evaluating BroMAP employing the dual bounds suggest that the use of the strengthened bounds does not in general improve the running time of BroMAP due to the longer running time of the dual method.
by Eun-Jong Hong.
Ph.D.
Biddle, Jason Charles. "Methods and applications in computational protein design." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61792.
Full textThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 107-111).
In this thesis, we summarize our work on applications and methods for computational protein design. First, we apply computational protein design to address the problem of degradation in stored proteins. Specifically, we target cysteine, asparagine, glutamine, and methionine amino acid residues to reduce or eliminate a protein's susceptibility to degradation via aggregation, deamidation, and oxidation. We demonstrate this technique on a subset of degradation-prone amino acids in phosphotriesterase, an enzyme that hydrolyzes toxic organophosphates including pesticides and chemical warfare agents. Second, we introduce BroMAP/A*, an exhaustive branch-and- bound search technique with enumeration. We compare performance of BroMAP/A* to DEE/A*, the current standard for conformational search with enumeration in the protein design community. When limited computational resources are available, DEE/A* sometimes fails to find the global minimum energy conformation and/or enumerate the lowest-energy conformations for large designs. Given the same computational resources, we show how BroMAP/A* is able to solve large designs by efficiently dividing the search space into small, solvable subproblems.
by Jason Charles Biddle.
S.M.
Fuller, Jonathan Christopher. "Computational approaches for drug design at the protein-protein interface." Thesis, University of Leeds, 2010. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1699/.
Full textDavey, James A. "Multistate Computational Protein Design: Theories, Methods, and Applications." Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/35541.
Full textMARCHETTI, FILIPPO. "COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES OF PROTEIN-PROTEIN AND PROTEIN-ANTIBODY INTERACTIONS: IMPLICATION FOR MOLECULAR DESIGN." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/825462.
Full textGrigoryan, Gevorg Ph D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Computational approaches for the design and prediction of protein-protein interactions." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/38997.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 167-187).
There is a large class of applications in computational structural biology for which atomic-level representation is crucial for understanding the underlying biological phenomena, yet explicit atomic-level modeling is computationally prohibitive. Computational protein design, homology modeling, protein interaction prediction, docking and structure recognition are among these applications. Models that are commonly applied to these problems combine atomic-level representation with assumptions and approximations that make them computationally feasible. In this thesis I focus on several aspects of this type of modeling, analyze its limitations, propose improvements and explore applications to the design and prediction of protein-protein interactions.
by Gevorg Grigoryan.
Ph.D.
Park, Daniel J. (Daniel John) 1979. "Computational tools for including specificity in protein design." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/87286.
Full textSisu, Cristina Smaranda Domnica. "Computational studies on protein similarity, specificity and design." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2011. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.609407.
Full textBooks on the topic "Computational protein design"
Samish, Ilan, ed. Computational Protein Design. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6637-0.
Full textTorsten, Schwede, and Peitsch Manuel C, eds. Computational structural biology: Methods and applications. Hackensack, N.J: World Scientific, 2008.
Find full textHans-Joachim, Böhm, and Schneider Gisbert 1965-, eds. Protein-ligand interactions from molecular recognition to drug design. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2003.
Find full textMoreira, Irina S., Miguel Machuqueiro, and Joana Mourão, eds. Computational Design of Membrane Proteins. New York, NY: Springer US, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1468-6.
Full textStoddard, Barry L., ed. Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3569-7.
Full textMather A. R. Sadiq Al-Baghdadi. CFD models for analysis and design of PEM fuel cells CFD models for analysis & design of PEM fuel cells. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2008.
Find full textMaher A. R. Sadiq Al-Baghdadi. CFD modeling and analysis of different novel designs of air-breathing PEM fuel cells. Hauppauge, N.Y: Nova Science Publishers, 2009.
Find full textMaher A. R. Sadiq Al-Baghdadi. CFD modeling and analysis of different novel designs of air-breathing PEM fuel cells. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2010.
Find full textHarren, Jhoti, and Leach Andrew R, eds. Structure-based drug discovery. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.
Find full textTakao, Kumazawa, Kruger Lawrence, and Mizumura Kazue, eds. The polymodal receptor: A gateway to pathological pain. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Computational protein design"
Saven, Jeffery G. "Computational Protein Design." In Protein Engineering Handbook, 325–42. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9783527634026.ch12.
Full textShifman, Julia, and Anamika Singh. "Computational Protein Design." In Encyclopedia of Biophysics, 1–7. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35943-9_10084-1.
Full textZhou, Yichao, Bruce R. Donald, and Jianyang Zeng. "Parallel Computational Protein Design." In Methods in Molecular Biology, 265–77. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6637-0_13.
Full textKuhlman, Brian, Tim Jacobs, and Tom Linskey. "Computational Design of Protein Linkers." In Methods in Molecular Biology, 341–51. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3569-7_20.
Full textKiss, Gert, Scott A. Johnson, Geoffrey Nosrati, Nihan Çelebi-Ölçüm, Seonah Kim, Robert Paton, and Kendal N. Houk. "Computational Design of New Protein Catalysts." In Modeling of Molecular Properties, 241–66. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9783527636402.ch16.
Full textSamish, Ilan. "The Framework of Computational Protein Design." In Methods in Molecular Biology, 3–19. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6637-0_1.
Full textO’Mara, Megan L., and Evelyne Deplazes. "Polypeptide and Protein Modeling for Drug Design." In Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience, 2439–47. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6675-8_732.
Full textO’Mara, Megan L., and Evelyne Deplazes. "Polypeptide and Protein Modeling for Drug Design." In Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience, 1–9. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_732-1.
Full textJohnson, Lucas B., Thaddaus R. Huber, and Christopher D. Snow. "Methods for Library-Scale Computational Protein Design." In Methods in Molecular Biology, 129–59. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1486-9_7.
Full textCarbonell, Pablo, and Jean-Yves Trosset. "Computational Protein Design Methods for Synthetic Biology." In Methods in Molecular Biology, 3–21. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1878-2_1.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Computational protein design"
Arikawa, Keisuke. "A Computational Framework for Predicting the Motions of a Protein System From a Robot Kinematics Viewpoint." In ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2013-12527.
Full textTortosa, Pablo. "Active Sites by Computational Protein Design." In FROM PHYSICS TO BIOLOGY: The Interface between Experiment and Computation - BIFI 2006 II International Congress. AIP, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2345625.
Full textLI, XIANG, and JIE LIANG. "COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN OF COMBINATORIAL PEPTIDE LIBRARY FOR MODULATING PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS." In Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812702456_0004.
Full textSMADBECK, JAMES, GEORGE A. KHOURY, MEGHAN B. PETERSON, and CHRISTODOULOS A. FLOUDAS. "ADVANCES IN DE NOVO PROTEIN DESIGN FOR MONOMERIC, MULTIMERIC, AND CONFORMATIONAL SWITCH PROTEINS." In International Symposium on Mathematical and Computational Biology. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814520829_0010.
Full textShahbazi, Zahra, Horea T. Ilies¸, and Kazem Kazerounian. "On Hydrogen Bonds and Mobility of Protein Molecules." In ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2009-87470.
Full textSimoncini, David, Sophie Barbe, Thomas Schiex, and Sébastien Verel. "Fitness landscape analysis around the optimum in computational protein design." In GECCO '18: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3205455.3205626.
Full textAlbuquerque, Vitória, Ernesto Caffarena, and João Silva. "Computational design of neutralizing scfv for gastric cancer protein cldn6." In International Symposium on Immunobiologicals. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.35259/isi.2022_52286.
Full textLillian, Todd D., N. C. Perkins, and S. Goyal. "Computational Elastic Rod Model Applied to DNA Looping." In ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2007-34956.
Full textChen, Mao, Chao Yu, and Jiagang Ouyang. "A Tabu Search Algorithm for the Protein Folding Problem." In 2009 Second International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iscid.2009.66.
Full textKoh, Sung K., and G. K. Ananthasuresh. "Design of HP Models of Proteins by Energy Gap Criterion Using Continuous Modeling and Optimization." In ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2004-57598.
Full textReports on the topic "Computational protein design"
Sapiro, Guillermo. New Forcefields and Algorithms for Computational Protein Design. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada428012.
Full textAvdjieva, Irena, Ivan Terziyski, Gergana Zahmanova, Anelia Nisheva, and Dimitar Vassilev. Fusion Protein Design with Computational Homologybased Structure Prediction. "Prof. Marin Drinov" Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2021.07.07.
Full textGershoni, Jonathan M., David E. Swayne, Tal Pupko, Shimon Perk, Alexander Panshin, Avishai Lublin, and Natalia Golander. Discovery and reconstitution of cross-reactive vaccine targets for H5 and H9 avian influenza. United States Department of Agriculture, January 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2015.7699854.bard.
Full textFernando, P. U. Ashvin Iresh, Gilbert Kosgei, Matthew Glasscott, Garrett George, Erik Alberts, and Lee Moores. Boronic acid functionalized ferrocene derivatives towards fluoride sensing. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), July 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/44762.
Full textOr, Etti, David Galbraith, and Anne Fennell. Exploring mechanisms involved in grape bud dormancy: Large-scale analysis of expression reprogramming following controlled dormancy induction and dormancy release. United States Department of Agriculture, December 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2002.7587232.bard.
Full text