Academic literature on the topic 'Computer software / Law and legislation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Computer software / Law and legislation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Computer software / Law and legislation"
Suslina, Irina, and Valeriya Tarasova. "Law Protection of Computer Programs in the State of Israel." Tirosh. Jewish, Slavic & Oriental Studies 18 (2018): 206–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/2658-3380.2018.18.4.2.
Full textLeonov, Borys, and Valerii Serohin. "Issues of Legal and Expert Support of Law Enforcement Activities in the Field of Cybercrime Counteraction." Information Security of the Person, Society and State, no. 27 (2019): 6–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.51369/2707-7276-2019-3-1.
Full textBorking, John. "Software copyright part II: The new German legislation." Computer Law & Security Review 2, no. 2 (July 1986): 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0267-3649(86)90060-9.
Full textAryamov, A. A., and Yu V. Gracheva. "DIGITALIZATION: CRIMINAL LAW RISKS IN THE ECONOMY." Actual Problems of Russian Law, no. 6 (July 18, 2019): 108–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.103.6.108-116.
Full textAkhtar, Zia. "Digital Technology, Internet Research and Benefits of a Virtual Library." International Journal of Legal Information 48, no. 3 (2020): 110–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jli.2020.30.
Full textMilash, V. S. "OBJECTS OF INTERNET LEGAL RELATIONS IN CONDITIONS DIGITALIZATION OF ECONOMY." Economics and Law, no. 2 (September 9, 2021): 16–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2021.02.016.
Full textDolganin, A. A. "Software Distribution in E-Form: the Problem of Choosing a Contractual Model." Lex Russica, no. 1 (January 19, 2021): 9–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.170.1.009-017.
Full textZerov, Konstiantyn. "Copyright protection for computer programs." Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property, no. 6 (June 16, 2021): 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.33731/62020.233854.
Full textKlynina, Tetiana. "Rogers Act 1924: establishment of a professional USA Foreign Service." American History & Politics Scientific edition, no. 10 (2020): 35–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2521-1706.2020.10.3.
Full textShine Thompson, Mary, and Ann-Katrin Lena Svaerd. "Unintended consequences of special-needs law in Ireland and Sweden." Kybernetes 48, no. 2 (February 4, 2019): 333–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/k-06-2018-0307.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Computer software / Law and legislation"
Nichols, Kenneth Nolan. "Technical-legal aspects of software patents." CSUSB ScholarWorks, 1996. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1249.
Full textKarjiker, Sadulla. "Open-source software and the rationale for copyright protection of computer programs." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/80044.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The rationale for the legal protection of copyright works is based on the perceived need to encourage the creation of works which are considered to be socially beneficial. By awarding authors proprietary rights in their creations, copyright law allows authors the ability to earn direct financial returns from their efforts, and, thus, copyright law provides the required incentives for authors to create copyright works. Since the early days of commercial software development, copyright protection has been extended to computer programs; thus, by providing such protection it was assumed that their production should be encouraged, and that without such protection they will not be produced to the extent required by society. Comparatively recently, we have witnessed large-scale production of open-source software, which is licensed on generous terms, giving users the right to freely use, modify and redistribute such software. By adopting such licensing terms, the authors of open-source software are unable to charge licensees a fee for permission to use their software, which is the reward which copyright assumes authors seek to create such software. This development has made it necessary to re-evaluate the rationale for copyright protection of computer programs, and determine whether the continued protection of computer programs is justifiable. This study seeks to first establish a coherent theoretical justification for copyright protection, which it is submitted should be an economic justification, rather than a moral justification. The legal analysis in this work seeks to establish whether the copyright protection of computer programs is consistent with the economic justification for copyright protection. In particular, the analysis focuses on the current scope of copyright protection, and seeks to establish whether such protection is excessive, stifling creativity and innovation, and, thus, imposing too high a social cost. It is contended that copyright doctrine has generally sought to minimise these costs, and that current scope of copyright protection of computer programs leaves enough creative room for the production of new software. Despite the fact that the effect of open-source software licences is that authors are unable to earn the direct financial rewards which copyright enables authors to earn as an incentive to create such software, their authors continue to have financial incentives to create such software. Commercial firms who invest in open-source software do so because they seek to provide financially-rewarding related services in respect of software, or because it serves to promote sales in their complementary products. Similarly, the participation of individual computer programmers is largely consistent with the standard economic theories relating to labour markets and the private provision of public goods. Individuals are principally motivated by economic motives, such as career concerns. Copyright protection gives participants the choice to opt for the direct financial rewards which its proprietary protection enables, or the more indirect financial rewards of open-source software development. It is submitted within this research that rather than undermining the rationale for copyright protection of computer programs, the development of open-source software has illustrated that copyright protection allows for the emergence of alternative business models, which may be more economically advantageous to authors.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die rasionaal agter outeursregbeskerming wat deur die reg verleen word is gebasseer op 'n behoefte om die skepping van werke wat sosiaal voordelig geag word te bevorder. Outeursreg verleen aan outeurs direkte finansiële vergoeding vir hul inspanning deur die vestiging van eiendomsreg oor hul werke. Dus, outeursreg voorsien outeurs van die nodige insentiewe om sulke werke te skep. Sedert die begindae van kommersiële sagteware ontwikkeling, is outeursregbeskerming uitgebrei om aan rekenaarprogramme sulke beskerming te bied. Deur die bied van outeursregbeskerming word daar aangeneem dat die ontwikkeling van rekenaarprogramme aangemoedig word en dat sonder die genoemde beskerming programme nie geproduseer sal word tot in 'n mate benodig deur die samelewing nie. Onlangs egter, is daar 'n grootskaalse ontwikkeling van oopbronsagteware opgemerk. Hierdie sagteware word onder ruime terme gelisensieer en gee aan gebruikers die reg om die genoemde sagteware te gebruik, te wysig en vrylik te versprei. Deur sulke terme van lisensiëring aan te neem word outeurs verhoed om vanaf lisensiehouers 'n fooi te vorder vir die toestemming om die sagteware te gebruik. Outeursreg neem aan dat hierdie vergoeding die basis vorm waarom outeurs sulke sagteware ontwikkel. Hierdie ontwikkeling maak dit nodig om die rasionaal agter outeursregbeskerming van rekenaarprogramme te her-evalueer en ook om vas te stel of die volgehoue beskerming van rekenaarprogramme regverdigbaar is. Hierdie studie poog om, eerstens, 'n samehangende teoretiese regverdiging vir outeursreg te vestig. Daar word aan die hand gedoen dat hierdie beskerming 'n ekonomiese, eerder as 'n morele regverdiging as grondslag moet hê. Die regsontleding vervat in hierdie werk poog om vas te stel of die outeursregbeskerming wat aan rekenaarprogramme verleen word in lyn is met die ekonomiese regverdiging van outeursregbeskerming. Die analise fokus in besonder op die huidige bestek van outeursregbeskerming en poog om vas te stel of sodanige beskerming oormatig is, of dit kreatiwiteit en innovasie onderdruk en derhalwe te hoë sosiale koste tot gevolg het. Daar word geargumenteer dat outeursreg in die algemeen poog om sosiale koste te verlaag en dat die huidige omvang van outeursregbeskerming van rekenaarprogramme voldoende kreatiewe ruimte vir die ontwikkeling van nuwe sagteware laat. Die effek van oopbronsagteware is dat outeurs nie in staat is om direkte finansiële vergoeding te verdien, wat as insentief gesien word vir die ontwikkeling van sagteware, nie. Ten spyte hiervan is daar steeds voldoende finansiële insentiewe om sodanige sagteware te ontwikkel. Kommersiële firmas belê in oopbronsagteware om finansiëel lonende verwante dienste ten opsigte van sagteware te voorsien. Dit kan ook dien om verkope in hul onderskeie aanvullende produkte te bevorder. Eweweens is die deelname van individuele rekenaarprogrameerders oorwegend in lyn met die standaard ekonomiese teoriëe ten opsigte van die arbeidsmark en die privaat voorsiening van openbare goedere. Individue word gemotiveer deur ekonomiese motiewe, soos byvoorbeeld oorwegings wat verband hou met hul loopbane. Outeursregbeskerming bied aan deelnemers die keuse om voordeel te trek uit die direkte finansiële vergoeding wat moontlik gemaak word deur outeursregbeskerming of uit die meer indirekte finansiële vergoeding gebied deur die ontwikkeling van oopbronsagteware. In hierdie navorsing word daar geargumenteer dat die ontwikkeling van oopbronsagteware geillustreer het dat outeursregbeskerming die onstaan van alternatiewe besigheidsmodelle toelaat wat ekonomies meer voordelig is vir outeurs in plaas daarvan dat dit die rasionaal vir die outeursregbeskerming van rekenaarprogramme ondermyn.
Bac, Joanna Ewa. "Software intelligence (SI), dependent legal personhood & SI-human amalgamation : an evolutionary step for US patent law and SI." Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2018. http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=237873.
Full textHodge, Dominic Shaughn. "The income tax consequences of the in-house development of software." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1013550.
Full textEverett, Christopher E. "Fundamentals of software patent protection at a university." Master's thesis, Mississippi State : Mississippi State University, 2003. http://library.msstate.edu/etd/show.asp?etd=etd-01062003-174536.
Full textForsyth, Guy, and N/A. "A minimalist sui generis legislative proposal for the application of common law principles to the protection of computer software." University of Canberra. Law, 1998. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20090714.142532.
Full textDogan, Fatih. "Patentrechtlicher Schutz von Computerprogrammen." Berlin wvb, Wiss. Verl, 2005. http://www.wvberlin.de/data/inhalt/dogan.htm.
Full textLouw, Sanelda. "Die belastingaftrekbaarheid van sagteware." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/20434.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to determine the applicability of the various South African Income Taxation Act sections on the deduction of software costs. A distinction is made between the various deduction sections in the Income Taxation Act that are applicable to software costs. By doing this an appropriate taxation deduction is recommended for the different types of software costs that the taxpayer incurs. Software assets and expenditure can be divided into various categories based on the acquisition agreement. The rights and assets that are obtained, differ for each category of software cost. In some instances a copyright is obtained and in other instances only a right of use is obtained. Furthermore the taxpayer receives intellectual property, an intangible asset, and/or a tangible asset. A literature study and an analysis of the different types of software costs and the four concerned Income Taxation Act sections serve as background for the consideration of the applicability of each specific deduction section in the Income Taxation Act on the various categories of software costs. By using the information obtained in the literature study and the analyses, a recommendation is made of the most applicable deduction article for each category of software cost.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie studie het ten doel om die toepaslikheid van die verskillende Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomstebelastingwetsartikels, op die aftrekking van sagtewarekoste te bepaal. 'n Onderskeid word getref tussen die verskillende aftrekkingsartikels wat van toepassing is op sagtewarekoste in die Inkomstebelastingwet. Sodoende word 'n geskikte belastingaftrekking vir die verskillende tipes sagtewarekoste voorgestel wat deur elke belastingpligtige aangegaan word. Sagtewarebates of -uitgawes kan in verskillende kategoriee verdeel word na aanleiding van die verkrygingsooreenkoms wat aangegaan is. Die regte en bates wat verkry word verskil ten opsigte van elke kategorie sagtewarekoste. In sommige gevalle word 'n outeursreg verkry en in ander gevalle slegs 'n gebruiksreg. Verder kan of intellekuele eiendom, 'n ontasbare bate, en/of 'n tasbare bate verkry word. 'n Literatuurstudie en analise van die verskillende tipes sagtewarekoste en die vIer betrokke Inkomstebelastingwetsartikels dien as agtergrond vir die oorweging van die toepaslikheid van elke spesifieke aftrekkingsartikel in die Inkomstebelastingwet op die onderskeie kategoriee sagtewarekoste. Daama word die inligting wat bekom is in die literatuurstudie en analise gebruik om die mees toepaslike aftrekkingsartikel vir elke kategorieë sagtewarekoste voor te stel.
Lundström, Justus, Jonas Widriksson, and Viktor Zaunders. "Changes in media consumption and file sharing : The impact of legislation and new digital media services." Thesis, Jönköping University, JIBS, Business Informatics, 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-12534.
Full textIn this study we investigate how the attitude and behaviour concerning illegal file shar-ing have changed among the young population in Sweden. The study will analyze the impact of the IPRED law that was introduced in April 2008 and new digital media ser-vices that have emerged in the last couple of years. It is also evaluated which of these have had the most impact on the attitude and behaviour of the selected population.
The main part of our research consists of a quantitative survey handed out to a sample population among high school students (ages 16-20) in Jönköping, Sweden. This pri-mary data is later compared to secondary data from a similar study that was done on the same demographics two years prior to this research in order to measure the change in behaviour and attitude. The previous study was conducted prior to the IPRED law im-plementation by one of the authors. We also used prior research within this subject and related fields to further understand and interpret our data.
What we have discovered through our research is that there has been a decrease in ille-gal file sharing, especially when considering music, however this decrease is much more an effect of the adopting of new media services then it can be attributed to the IPRED law. Furthermore, the attitudes towards file sharing have remained unchanged and a large number of young adults do not feel that file sharing should be illegal.
It is also concluded that good legal alternatives to file sharing have a large market po-tential if these services can fulfil consumers demand on availability and price. Addition-ally we have found that good legal alternatives are important if the public is to refrain from returning to their old file sharing habits once the initial scare from new legislation has worn off.
Kacher, Benjamin Lawrence. "Commercial Computer Software License Rights in Defense Acquisition." Thesis, The George Washington University, 2014. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1566105.
Full textThe tremendous growth of the commercial software industry in the United States represents an excellent opportunity for the United States Department of Defense ("DoD") to acquire quality software products that will help the DoD achieve its missions. However, the DoD struggles to acquire commercial computer software ("CCS") and commercial computer software documentation ("CCSD") effectively because of the inconsistencies and contradictions found in its rules governing the acquisition of CCS and CCSD.
The DoD's rules governing the acquisition of CCS and CCSD appear simple on the surface and represent an admirable attempt to enable the DoD to more easily acquire CCS and CCSD in the commercial marketplace and to allow commercial vendors to sell their products to the DoD. However, these rules contain many unseen inconsistencies and problems and therefore lead to many areas of confusion and even contradiction.
The primary purpose of this paper is to find ways to help the DoD and CCS vendors work together more effectively, by explaining the DoD's rules governing acquisition of CCS and CCSD, explaining fourteen primary problem areas associated with the acquisition of CCS and CCSD and, finally, by exploring potential solutions to these problems.
Books on the topic "Computer software / Law and legislation"
Kutten, L. J. Federal taxation of computer software. 2nd ed. Reno, NV: Software Taxation Institute, 1997.
Find full textKutten, L. J. Federal taxation of computer software. Wayne, PA: Kutish Publications, 1993.
Find full textCooper, Frederick L. Law and the software marketer. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1988.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Computer software / Law and legislation"
Nagel, Stuart S. "Computer-aided Law Decisions." In Applications of Decision-Aiding Software, 104–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12498-5_8.
Full textSchmitt, Michael N. "Computer Network Attack: The Normative Software." In Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 53–85. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-787-6_2.
Full textBertelsen, Olav. "Fitts' law as a design artefact: A paradigm case of theory in software design." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11–18. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58648-2_22.
Full textFitzpatrick, Ronan, and Catherine Higgins. "Usable Software and Its Attributes: A Synthesis of Software Quality, European Community Law and Human-Computer Interaction." In People and Computers XIII, 3–21. London: Springer London, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_1.
Full textSee, Harold, and Rebecca Copeland. "Economic Incentives and Computer Software: A Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Law." In Economic, Industrial and Managerial Coordination between Japan and the USA, 274–304. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22445-6_12.
Full textAlexandropoulou-Egyptiadou, Eugenia. "The Hellenic Framework for Computer Program Copyright Protection Following the Implementation of the Relative European Union Directives." In Investigating Cyber Law and Cyber Ethics, 280–87. IGI Global, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-132-0.ch014.
Full textAlexandropoulou-Egyptiadou, Eugenia. "The Hellenic Framework for Computer Program Copyright Protection Following the Implementation of the Relative European Union Directives." In Digital Rights Management, 738–45. IGI Global, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2136-7.ch033.
Full text"Copyright and computer software." In Innovation, Policy and Law, 96–122. Cambridge University Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511552304.005.
Full textKolb, Arne. "Protection of Computer Software." In Law and the Internet. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509955589.ch-010.
Full textPoulin, Daniel, Andrew Mowbray, and Pierre-Paul Lemyre. "Free Access to Law and Open Source Software." In Software Applications, 2803–11. IGI Global, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-060-8.ch164.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Computer software / Law and legislation"
TROFIMOV, Egor, and Oleg METSKER. "Computer Techniques and Indicators in the Policy of Optimization of Legislation and Law Enforcement." In Proceedings of the International Conference Digital Age: Traditions, Modernity and Innovations (ICDATMI 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201212.012.
Full textMandl, Peter, Pirmin Pezzei, David Veit, and Erich Leitgeb. "Selected health and law issues regarding mobile communications." In 2017 25th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/softcom.2017.8115581.
Full textFan, Yanhui, Hongguo Xu, and Zhen Dong. "Influence Law of Pedestrian's Head Throw Distance on Vehicle Body Surface." In 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering. IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/csse.2008.1295.
Full textPuljiz, Z., and M. Mikuc. "A hierarchical approach to generating power law Internet-like topologies." In 2007 15th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/softcom.2007.4446097.
Full textGumzej, Nina, and Drazen Dragicevic. "Cloud computing data protection aspects under Croatian and European union law." In 2014 22nd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/softcom.2014.7039084.
Full textBoiadjiev, George, Ivan Chavdarov, and Lyubomira Miteva. "Dynamics of a Planar Redundant Robot Based on Energy Conservation Law and Graph Theory." In 2020 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/softcom50211.2020.9238220.
Full textYu, Guorui, Shibin Zhao, Chao Zhang, Zhiniang Peng, Yuandong Ni, and Xinhui Han. "Code is the (F)Law: Demystifying and Mitigating Blockchain Inconsistency Attacks Caused by Software Bugs." In IEEE INFOCOM 2021 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/infocom42981.2021.9488749.
Full textYadu, Prakash Kumar, Usha Srinivasan, and Sreelal Sreedhar. "Validation Technique for on Board Safety Critical Control Law Software for an Aero Engine." In 2019 4th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computer Technologies and Optimization Techniques (ICEECCOT). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iceeccot46775.2019.9114604.
Full textSiegel, D. R. "Functional compatibility and the law: from the necessity of clean room development of computer software to the copyrightability of computer hardware." In COMPCON Spring 88. IEEE, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cmpcon.1988.4890.
Full textLozano, Mayte, and Raquel Trillo-Lado. "Consolidation of a professional approach experience on motivating Computer Engineering students to the application of legal issues." In HEAd'16 - International Conference on Higher Education Advances. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/head16.2016.2713.
Full text