Relevant bibliographies by topics / Conee e Feldman

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Conee e Feldman'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Conee e Feldman.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Conee e Feldman"

1

McCain, Kevin. "EXPLANATIONIST EVIDENTIALISM." Episteme 10, no. 3 (2013): 299–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/epi.2013.22.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractIn their most recent co-authored work, Conee and Feldman (2008) suggest that epistemic support should be understood in terms of best explanations. Although this suggestion is plausible, Conee and Feldman admit that they have not provided the necessary details for a complete account of epistemic support. This article offers an explanationist account of epistemic support of the kind that Conee and Feldman suggest. It is argued that this account of epistemic support yields the intuitively correct results in a wide variety of cases. Further, this explanationist account of epistemic support
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

García Duque, Carlos Emilio. "EL PROBLEMA DE LA GENERALIDAD EN LA EPISTEMOLOGÍA CONFIABILISTA." Praxis Filosófica, no. 25 (December 13, 2011): 5–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i25.3109.

Full text
Abstract:
Las discusiones sobre epistemología confiabilista suelen centrarse en elexamen de teorías de proceso confiable, según las cuales una creencia esjustificada syss es producida por procesos que son generalmente confiables.Pero la noción de “proceso-tipo confiable” es muy controvertida. Por ejemplo,autores como Conee y Feldman consideran que las teorías de la justificaciónde proceso confiable son irremediablemente defectuosas, debido al “problemade la generalidad”. En este trabajo me propongo bosquejar la idea central dejustificación en términos confiabilistas, y determinar hasta qué punto sepuede
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

LONG, TODD R. "A proper de jure objection to the epistemic rationality of religious belief." Religious Studies 46, no. 3 (2010): 375–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412509990382.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractI answer Alvin Plantinga's challenge to provide a ‘proper’ de jure objection to religious belief. What I call the ‘sophisticates’ evidential objection' (SEO) concludes that sophisticated Christians lack epistemic justification for believing central Christian propositions. The SEO utilizes a theory of epistemic justification in the spirit of the evidentialism of Richard Feldman and Earl Conee. I defend philosophical interest in the SEO (and its underlying evidentialism) against objections from Reformed epistemology, by addressing Plantinga's criteria for a proper de jure objection, his
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Stoutenburg, Gregory. "BEST EXPLANATIONISM AND JUSTIFICATION FOR BELIEFS ABOUT THE FUTURE." Episteme 12, no. 4 (2015): 429–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.22.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractEarl Conee and Richard Feldman have recently argued that the evidential support relation should be understood in terms of explanatory coherence: roughly, one's evidence supports a proposition if and only if that proposition is part of the best available explanation of the evidence (2008). Their thesis has been criticized through alleged counterexamples, perhaps the most important of which are cases where a subject has a justified belief about the future (Byerly 2013; Byerly and Martin forthcoming). Kevin McCain has defended the thesis against Byerly's counterexample (2013, 2014a). I ar
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Piazza, Tommaso. "Problems for Mainstream Evidentialism." Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47, no. 1 (2017): 148–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1244629.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractEvidentialism says that a subject S’s justification is entirely determined by S’s evidence. The plausibility of evidentialism depends on (1) what kind of entities constitute a subject S’s evidence and (2) what one takes the support relation to consist in. Conee and Feldman’s mainstream evidentialism (ME) incorporates a psychologist answer to (1) and an explanationist answer to (2). ME naturally accommodates perceptual justification. However, it does not accommodate intuitive cases of inferential justification. In the second part of the paper, I consider and reject a reply based on a re
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Conee e Feldman"

1

Danilevicz, Igor. "Introdu??o ao evidencialismo em epistemologia." Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, 2018. http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8287.

Full text
Abstract:
Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-09-17T18:07:38Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_IGOR DANILEVICZ.pdf: 1094423 bytes, checksum: 99d196d8f4216de68382957117ea2321 (MD5)<br>Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2018-09-18T11:21:55Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_IGOR DANILEVICZ.pdf: 1094423 bytes, checksum: 99d196d8f4216de68382957117ea2321 (MD5)<br>Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-18T11:28:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_IGOR DANILEVICZ.pdf: 1094423 bytes, checksum: 99d196d8f4216de68382957117ea2321 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

McMillen, Brooke. "Embryo Adoption: Implications of Personhood, Marriage, and Parenthood." Thesis, Connect to resource online, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1805/1613.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (M.A.)--Indiana University, 2008.<br>Department of Philosophy, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). Advisor(s): Peggy Zeglin Brand, Jason T. Eberl, Michael B. Burke. Includes vitae. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 79-84).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Conee e Feldman"

1

Khalifa, Kareem, Jared Millson, and Mark Risjord. Inference to the Best Explanation. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198746904.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
Many epistemologists take Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) to be “fundamental.” For instance, Lycan (1988, 128) writes that “all justified reasoning is fundamentally explanatory reasoning.” Conee and Feldman (2008, 97) concur: “fundamental epistemic principles are principles of best explanation.” Call them fundamentalists. They assert that nothing deeper could justify IBE, as is typically assumed of rules of deductive inference, such as modus ponens. We will argue that the (explanatory) pluralism adopted by the leading theorists of the best explanation—philosophers of science—undermines
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Conee e Feldman"

1

Millar, Alan. "Perception and the Justification of Belief." In Knowing by Perceiving. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755692.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
The discussion in this chapter is critical of theories that treat experiences, conceived in a non-relationalistic fashion, as evidence for beliefs, as in the work of Earl Conee and Richard Feldman. It is also critical of James Pryor’s theory of immediate justification. Judgements implicated in recognition, being exercises of general recognitional abilities, are regarded as rationally responsive to ways the world is. Justification for beliefs acquired in acts of recognition is provided by truths as to what one perceives to be so. An account is given of our access to such truths, and objections to the view of justification are addressed. Affinities with, and differences from, views advanced by John McDowell are explored, with particular attention given to his conceptions of experience. Implications for empiricism are drawn out.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography