Academic literature on the topic 'Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (1975 : Helsinki)'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (1975 : Helsinki).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (1975 : Helsinki)"

1

Of the Journal, Editorial board. "The Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe." Ukrainian Religious Studies, no. 2 (September 27, 1996): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.32420/1996.2.46.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bone, Richard. "To Helsinki: the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1973–1975." International Affairs 62, no. 2 (1986): 287–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2618377.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rojansky, Matthew. "The Geopolitics of European Security and Cooperation." Security and Human Rights 25, no. 2 (June 22, 2014): 169–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02502006.

Full text
Abstract:
At the present moment of obvious tension between Moscow and Washington, it may be tempting to dismiss the likelihood of progress on any diplomatic front, let alone in the complex multilateral format of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Yet the 1972–75 Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (csce) itself took place against a backdrop of intense rivalry between the u.s. and Soviet-led blocs, suggesting that reasoned dialogue and consensus on core issues of shared security in the osce space is possible, despite—or perhaps even because of—the looming threat of conflict between geopolitical rivals. Despite some superficial similarities, relations between Russia and the United States today are sufficiently different from the past that they cannot accurately be described as a conflict in the same category as the Cold War. The u.s.-Russia relations have been severely strained over the crisis in Ukraine, but management of the crisis alone will not be enough to restore productive relations between Washington and Moscow or to repair the damage to European security. The best hope is likely a return to the principles of the 1975 Helsinki Final Act, and through a similarly inclusive region-wide dialogue. Today, the United States, Europe, and Russia all share an interest in renewal of just such a dialogue, although what will not—indeed what must not—return is the Cold War “balance of terror” that exerted pressure on all sides to participate seriously in the original Helsinki process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dimitrijevic, Dusko. "Review of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe: 40 years after Helsinki." Medjunarodni problemi 67, no. 4 (2015): 365–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/medjp1504365d.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper deals with the genesis of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) as the important pan-European forum for addressing security issues during the Cold War era, and, secondly, analyses the dynamics of institutional changes that led to establishment of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). As an active factor in the process of d?tente and the easing of tensions between the then USSR and the United States, the CSCE was the place in which were flowing all initiatives related to overcoming the security problems in bipolar Europe. The paper provides a brief of negotiation process that produced the Helsinki Final Act of 1975, an international political document that laid down the basic principles of interstate relations and political commitments in a number of areas, from military-political security, to economic and environmental co-operation and human rights. The author concludes that the role of the OSCE is likely to stagnate in the 21st century, for it will not be sufficiently capable to influence Euro-Atlantic and Euroasian affairs, and to maintain its function as an important consultative and negotiating mechanism, as well as a platform for regional security and cooperation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pașca, Vlad. "A Détente Equation: The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and Socialist Experts before Helsinki (1947–1975)." East Central Europe 45, no. 2-3 (November 29, 2018): 160–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18763308-04502002.

Full text
Abstract:
The article explores the main features of cooperation between economic experts during the pre-csce (Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe) period (1947–1975) under the aegis of the most comprehensive all-European organization of the period, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (unece). At scientific and policy levels, contacts and exchanges between socialist and capitalist economic experts were circumscribed by common priorities and challenges faced by the unece staff and governments from both sides of the Iron Curtain. The article presents four types of activities pertaining to East-West cooperation: international conferences, training programs, institutionalized consultations (under the Committee for Trade Development and the group of Senior Economic Advisers to the unece Governments), and direct collaboration with the unece Secretariat and its subsidiary bodies. The contribution focuses on the institutional aspects of the socialist economic experts’ participation in the unece’s cooperative framework and the pan-European epistemic community. The study argues that the unece’s efforts towards détente also took into account community-building in the fields of economics, development of trade, and harmonization of policy-making from a transnational, all-European perspective.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Borko, Yuri. "The Birth of the Soviet School of European Integration Studies. Part 2." Contemporary Europe, no. 98 (October 1, 2020): 46–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope520204653.

Full text
Abstract:
The first part of the article shows that in the mid-1960s some Soviet researchers of the European integration problems concluded that integration did not correspond to the Leninist-Stalinist theory of the general crisis of capitalism. On the contrary, it corresponded to some Western concepts of the custom union, the common market, and economic integration. A new approach to the European integration studies was offered by the Institute of World Economy and International Relation (IMEMO), established in 1956. For many decades IMEMO was serving as the focal point for the European integration studies, and was providing the Soviet leadership with analytical information. The number of inquiries from authorities increased significantly. Firstly, it can be explained by the achievements of integration. Secondly, it was due to the growth of economic cooperation between the USSR and the EEC. Thirdly, Moscow defined new foreign policy priorities towards Western countries including Europe. There were two turning-points of bilateral relations: with France – in 1966, and with Germany – in 1969. The Organization for security and cooperation in Europe (OSCE) was established during final session of the top-level Conference of European States in Helsinki in August 1975. Fourthly, experience of the EEC was relevant for the COMECON
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kooijmans, P. H. "The Mountain Produced a Mouse: The CSCE Meeting of Experts on Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, Valletta 1991." Leiden Journal of International Law 5, no. 1 (February 1992): 91–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156500002004.

Full text
Abstract:
From the very beginning peaceful settlement of disputes has been on the agenda of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Principle V of the first chapter of the Final Act of Helsinki of 1975 (the so-called first basket) reaffirmed the obligation of the participating states to settle their disputes by peaceful means. The Final Act, however, does not provide a mechanism through which such disputes can be resolved. The Swiss delegation had submitted in 1973 a draft-convention (called the Bindschedler-proposal after its auctor intellectualis Rudolf Bindschedler, the Legal Advisor of the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs), containing a detailed system of compulsory dispute settlement. A distinction was made between judiciable and non-judiciable disputes. Judiciable disputes would be submitted to a permanent Arbitral Tribunal, non-judiciable disputes to a permanent Commission of Inquiry, Mediation and Conciliation. This proposal was, however, unacceptable to the East European states (with the exception of Romania) which had always rejected the idea of compulsory third-party dispute settlement, whereas the greaterpart of the Western states, although in principle favourable to a system of compulsory dispute settlement, had serious objections against the substance of the Swiss proposal, inter alia with regard to the rather artificial distinction between judiciable and non-judiciable disputes. The Swiss delegation did not insist on its proposal and went along with a clause in the Final Act which provided for a follow-up meeting of experts with the task “to pursue the examination and elaboration of a generally acceptable method for the peaceful settlement of disputes aimed at complementing existing methods”. It was decided that this meeting of experts was to be convened by Switzerland afterthe first follow-up meeting which was planned for 1977 in Belgrade.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Korey, William. "Minority Rights After Helsinki." Ethics & International Affairs 8 (March 1994): 119–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.1994.tb00161.x.

Full text
Abstract:
The “sexiest acronym in international diplomacy.” Such was a Washington pandit's roguish, if appropriate, characterization of the CSCE (Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe) just a few of years ago in 1990 after it critically helped ignite the revolutions in Eastern Europe and torpedo the Berlin Wall. Other, more serious, foreign affairs analysts were equally enthusiastic about CSCE. A prominent commentator called it the “premier post-Cold War political forum.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

VILÉN, TIMO. "Where east met west: Helsinki and the staging of the 1975 Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe." Urban History 42, no. 4 (August 17, 2015): 603–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963926815000516.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT:The final phase of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE) in 1975 is widely regarded as the high point of détente. This article discusses the staging and legacy of the CSCE from the perspective of its host city, Helsinki. The article examines how the Finnish initiative to host the conference became enmeshed with Helsinki's municipal politics and how the CSCE's and Finland's neutrality were used by the Helsinki authorities to project an attractive image of their city. The article further highlights the Helsinki Summit as a public spectacle with which a large number of local residents engaged.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Niessen, Jan. "The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe and Other European Fora on Migration." International Migration Review 28, no. 3 (September 1994): 580–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019791839402800308.

Full text
Abstract:
In the 1970s, during the Cold War era, European and North American states began a dialogue in Helsinki which became known as the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), or the Helsinki process. For Western states the CSCE served as a platform to raise questions related to security in Europe and the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Eastern European states considered the CSCE as a means to secure the postwar borders and an opportunity to discuss economic and scientific cooperation. Today, 51 European States, plus the United States of America and Canada, participate in this process. Notwithstanding the many and often intense political tensions between the West and the East during those twenty years, quite a number of conferences, seminars and other meetings were held and a great many agreements were adopted and documents issued, dealing with matters related to CSCE's three main areas of concern: security in Europe; cooperation in the fields of economics, science, technology and environment; the promotion of human rights. In response to the fundamental changes in Europe in the late 1980s, the CSCE was given a new impetus and its operational framework was broadened. CSCE offices were established in Prague (CSCE Secretariat), Vienna (Conflict Prevention Center) and Warsaw (Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights) with the aim to strengthen and monitor compliance with CSCE commitments, especially in the area of human rights. A Parliamentary Assembly was established and met twice, first in Budapest and then in Helsinki. A General Secretary and a High Commissioner on Minorities were appointed, with offices in Vienna and The Hague, respectively.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (1975 : Helsinki)"

1

Hebel, Kai. "Britain's contribution to détente : the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1972-1975." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2012. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:aa245538-86bd-4942-a842-4eaeaae93a5f.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis examines Britain’s role in the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE). Based on multi-archival research and interviews with key diplomats, it presents the first in-depth study of Britain’s involvement in the negotiations leading up to the Helsinki Final Act of 1 August 1975. It draws on Marc Trachtenberg’s notion of the ‘constructed peace’, and Alexander Wendt’s concept of ‘cultures of anarchy’ to elucidate how the rapprochement process at once stabilised and transformed the East-West conflict. This forms the theoretical framework of the thesis. The thesis revises the interpretation of détente as a status quo project driven by the imperatives of ‘Realpolitik’. Rather, different conceptions of stability and change challenged each other during the Helsinki talks. British diplomacy and the Final Act to which it contributed in fact linked the consolidation of the status quo to an ultimately transformative agenda that was infused with liberal ideas such as human rights. Realpolitik blended with Moralpolitik. To develop this argument, the thesis’ narrative first assesses Britain’s role in the early days of détente politics in the 1950s and 1960s. It then traces Britain’s role in the three main phases of the Helsinki process: the transition from bilateral to multilateral détente (1970-1972); preliminary talks (1972-1973); official negotiations (1973-1975). The British were defensive détente sceptics at the beginning of this process, but became ambitious and positive contributors over the course of the talks. The thesis thus argues that London played a significant part in the CSCE. British foreign policymakers were initially architects of the Cold War, but then early and active proponents of détente until the mid-1960s, when their continental partners adopted a more proactive approach. London was to return to the forefront of détente diplomacy when the CSCE process got under way. Its involvement in the CSCE also marked an important step in Britain’s own transformation into a European middle power. The multilateralisation of détente coincided with Britain’s integration into the European Community, providing a propitious environment in which London’s negotiators acted with determination and skill, thus reasserting their country’s influence despite its continuing relative decline.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

O'Hallaron, Carol Mary. "American human rights policy toward the Soviet Union in the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1975 to 1989 : the Belgrade, Madrid, and Vienna review meetings." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.339536.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (1975 : Helsinki)"

1

Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe., ed. To Helsinki--the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1973-1975. [Durham, N.C.]: Duke University Press, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe., ed. To Helsinki--the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1973-1975. Durham: Duke University Press, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Reimaa, Markku. Helsinki catch: European security accords 1975. Helsinki: Edita, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Helsinki catch: European security accords 1975. Helsinki: Edita, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

John, Fry. The Helsinki process: Negotiating security and cooperation in Europe. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Loth, Wilfried. Helsinki, 1. August 1975: Entspannung und Abrüstung. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Helsinki and Bulgaria. Sofia: Press, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Werner, Hänisch, and Schirmeister Helga 1935-, eds. Die Helsinki-Schlussakte, Grundlage für Sicherheit und Entspannung in Europa. Berlin: Staatsverlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Talalaev, A. N. Khelʹsinki: Print︠s︡ipy i realʹnostʹ. Moskva: I︠U︡ridicheskai︠a︡ literatura, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Talalaev, A. N. Khelʹsinki: Print͡s︡ipi i realʹnostʹ. Moskva: "I͡U︡rid. lit-ra", 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (1975 : Helsinki)"

1

Morgan, Michael Cotey. "Trust and Transparency at the CSCE, 1969–1975." In Trust, but Verify. Stanford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804798099.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) from 1969 to 1975. It contends that trust was both a tool and objective of the conference, detailing how, even in the absence of trust, a major international agreement was concluded with the Helsinki Final Act of 1975, the outcome of the CSCE talks. In a clear attempt to advance their respective interests, Warsaw Pact member states focused on state sovereignty and the immutability of post-World War II European borders as a cornerstone of their definition of international security, whereas North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member states emphasized transparency, freer movement, and human rights, as well as confidence-building measures. As this chapter argues, the “tangled lines of trust and distrust” at the CSCE among the United States, the Western European countries, the neutral states, and the Soviet Union were incredibly complex, but they eventually secured the conference's success.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

COCCIA, MASSIMO. "HELSINKI CONFERENCE AND FINAL ACT ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE." In Encyclopedia of Disputes Installment 10, 216–27. Elsevier, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-86241-9.50058-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography