Relevant bibliographies by topics / Conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh, 1988-1994

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh, 1988-1994'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 10 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh, 1988-1994.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh, 1988-1994"

1

Júnior, Helvécio de Jesus, and João Ricardo Guilherme Zimmer Xavier. "GEOPOLÍTICA DO CÁUCASO:." Revista da Escola Superior de Guerra 33, no. 69 (July 11, 2019): 13–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.47240/revistadaesg.v33i69.991.

Full text
Abstract:
A Guerra do Nagorno-Karabakh ocorreu entre 1988 e 1994, no primeiro momento entre as repúblicas soviéticas da Armênia e do Azerbaijão e, com as respectivas independências, em 1991, o conflito continuou e tomou maiores proporções. Em decorrência da importância geopolítica da região, as potências globais e regionais passam a influenciar no conflito que não foi resolvido até o momento, o que lhe dá um status de “sem guerra, nem paz”, com um cessar-fogo que não gerou o fim das hostilidades. Desta forma, serão apresentados, neste artigo, o histórico do conflito, seus aspectos geopolíticos, a ação de atores externos e os seus interesses na região.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ryan, J. M., Matthew Fleggson, John Beavis, and Cara Macnab. "Fast-Track Surgical Referral in a Population Displaced by War and Conflict." Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 96, no. 2 (February 2003): 56–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014107680309600202.

Full text
Abstract:
After the 1988–1994 conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, fought over the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, large numbers of people were resettled in camps in southern Azerbaijan. Healthcare in the camps was generally good but there was no access to hospitals. The Leonard Cheshire Centre of Conflict Recovery (LCC) organized a ‘fast-track’ system of surgical care in the southern camps by securing the help of still-functioning hospitals in the distant capital, Baku. Regular clinics were held in the camps for visiting specialists; and, by arrangement with the Government of Azerbaijan and various non-governmental organizations, treatment was offered to those who fell within strict selection criteria. After a pilot study yielded clear benefits, the scheme was transferred to a local nongovernmental organization, which successfully operated an expanded version. The hidden cost of war often includes the neglect of chronic medical conditions that require secondary and tertiary care. The ‘fast-track’ system illustrates the potential of existing facilities to meet these needs at modest cost, given sufficient support.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Dewantara, Andhika, and Muhammad Yamin. "Analisis Peran Rusia sebagai Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Nagorno Karabakh Periode 2008-2016." Insignia: Journal of International Relations 6, no. 1 (May 9, 2019): 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.ins.2019.6.1.1479.

Full text
Abstract:
The Nagorno Karabakh conflict is a conflict over territorial disputes that is synonymous with inter-Azerbaijan strife that adheres to the principle of integrating its territory in Nagorno Karabakh and Armenia which support the Nagorno Karabakh region and ethnic Armenians who are in it for independence from Azerbaijan. The dynamics of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia continue to unfold, and there has never been a sustainable peace agreement between the two parties in dispute since the peace agreement Bishkek (Bishkek Protocol) 1994. Along with the dynamics of the battle, Russia has a very active role in the mediation and peace-building process between the two parties in conflict. Russia's position as mediator is carried out within the official framework of the OSCE Minsk Group and in the personal initiation of the state in the medium of the trilateral meeting. This research will describe the dynamics of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict in the period 2008-2016 along with efforts to resolve disputes under the Russian role. Keywords : Nagorno Karabakh Conflict, Russia, Mediation, and Contigency Model
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Mustafayev, Elmar. "EU Values and Interests in the Resolution of Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: French Unilateralism." Resurgence of Anti Islam in the World 23, Spring 2021 (June 10, 2021): 65–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.25253/99.2021232.5.

Full text
Abstract:
The commentary looks at the stance of France on the Second Karabakh war between Armenia and Azerbaijan and subsequently the Russian-brokered trilateral truce deal, from the angle of the norms and values of the EU. To that end, the article studies the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict from the context of international law, the post-ceasefire period 1994-2020, and looks into the position of the EU on the issue of territorial integrity and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. By analyzing them, it argues that the standpoint of France is not in line with the norms and values of the EU, and also contradicts the position of a mediator state.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Minasyan, Sergey. "The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in the context of South Caucasus regional security issues: An Armenian perspective†." Nationalities Papers 45, no. 1 (January 2017): 131–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2016.1237938.

Full text
Abstract:
For more than a quarter-century, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has been one of the most important factors influencing the political map of the South Caucasus. On 12 May 1994, Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenia, and Azerbaijan signed a cease-fire agreement that ended military operations in the conflict zone and has been observed until recently. Negotiations for a peaceful settlement have been underway within the framework of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Minsk Group co-chaired by the USA, Russia, and France since 1992, but society and the elite in Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Azerbaijan remain largely unprepared for compromise. Considering the settlement process a zero-sum game, they have generally accused one another of escalating the conflict and of a lack of willingness to restore peace. Other countries and international organizations involved in the negotiations do not share a vision of the future and frequently pursue their own interests. Accordingly, the Karabakh conflict could remain unresolved for decades more. The aim of the paper is a general assessment of the current stage and dynamic of this conflict and the impact of new trends and old obstacles on the prospects for further settlement.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Qadir qızı Məcidova, Leyla. "From the history of Azerbaijan’ Karabakh victory." SCIENTIFIC WORK 68, no. 07 (July 22, 2021): 26–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/68/26-31.

Full text
Abstract:
Nagorno-Karabakh, one of the ancient cultural centre of Azerbaijan, is generally a part of Karabakh area. Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous region was founded in 4,4 thousand km2 area of the mountainous part of Karabakh during the Soviet power in 1923. So, the basis of separatism was founded in this area. The main problem was that a group of armenians, who were moved here in the XVIII century, claimed that they possess these areas. Armenian-Azerbaijan conflict started with armenians' claims for Azerbaijan lands and provacations in the ethnic backgrounds in 1988. Armenians of Soviet Union representations, Armenian leader of SSRI power and the foreign Armenian diaspora began active work to unite Nagorno Autonomous region with Armenian, using the weakening condition of central power of Armenian SSRI at the beginning of 1980 years. Key words: victory history, war, enemies, fake news, territorial claims, hostility
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Maresca, John J. "Lost Opportunities in Negotiating the Conflict over Nagorno Karabakh." International Negotiation 1, no. 3 (1996): 471–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180696x00188.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThere have been at least six moments in the evolution of the Armenian-Azeri conflict over Nagomo Karabakh which can be qualified as lost opportunities for negotiation toward management of the conflict; that is, moments when movement toward resolution could have been produced. These include early CSCE involvement in 1992, cooperation with Russia in 1993, provision of a peacekeeping force in 1993, provision of a special envoy in 1994, use of the CSCE summit of 1994, and use of an oil pipeline after 1994. Other possibilities are also examined; the idea of a special envoy should be retained.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Aplak, Hakan Soner, and Gokhan Sari. "Modeling Azerbaijan’s action process concerning Nagorno-Karabakh and the occupied territories." Global Journal of Sociology: Current Issues 7, no. 2 (September 10, 2017): 127–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/gjs.v7i2.2398.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was caused by the warring sides’ claims of land possession or their struggle to maintain possession of their land. Despite the historical reasons for the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, the primary factor for Karabakh's occupation by Armenia was the collapse of the Soviet Union. A limited ceasefire was achieved in 1994; however, lasting peace could not be sustained. During the tentative ceasefire, rising tensions at the Azerbaijan-Armenian border bring the countries back to the brink of war. Lack of a permanent solution to the conflict via diplomatic means has resulted in an increase in tensions since 2014. This study aimed to provide a systematic analysis of Azerbaijan’s perspective concerning the conflict, in terms of the political, economic, geographic, and military factors, as well as the other elements of national power. Using decisional analysis techniques of the factors mentioned above, the action process of Azerbaijan is modelled. Keywords: Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, influence diagram, decision analysis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ziyadov, Taleh. "Nagorno-Karabakh Negotiations: Though the Prism of a Multi-Issue Bargaining Model." International Negotiation 15, no. 1 (2010): 107–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180610x488209.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis article examines various phases in the Nagorno-Karabakh (NK) negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan using a Multi-Issue Bargaining Model ‐ a modified version of the traditional bargaining model. It offers micro-level and phase-by-phase analysis of the negotiation process, mediation efforts and proposed mechanisms for the settlement of the NK conflict. Issues on the negotiation table and the evolution of the Azerbaijani and Armenian positions over time constitute a central focus of the article. The multi-issue model is applied to each negotiation phase in the NK conflict from 1994 until 2009.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Doose, Katja. "The Armenian Earthquake of 1988: A Perfect Stage for the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict." Europe-Asia Studies 70, no. 6 (July 3, 2018): 924–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1487679.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh, 1988-1994"

1

Tomotoeva, Gulnara Jolicoeur Pierre. "Conflit sécessionniste en Azerbaïdjan peut-il y avoir d'autres Nagorno-Karabakh ? /." [S.l.] : [s.n.], 2004. http://www.enssib.fr/bibliotheque/documents/dessride/rrbtomotoeva.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Jolicoeur, Pierre. "Influence de la Russie dans le conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh entre 1988 et 1996." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp04/mq26222.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Papazian, Lalig. "Nationalism and militarized crisis : the case of Nagorno-Karabagh." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ37225.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Poghossian, Lilit. "Will there ever be peace? an analysis of the international involvement in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict through the theories of neorealism and neoliberalism (Armenia, Azerbaijan) /." Click here for download, 2006. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/villanova/fullcit?p1432501.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Torossian, Sévag. "Le Haut Karabakh." Paris 2, 2004. http://www.theses.fr/2004PA020010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Tranca, Oana. "Recherche de modélisation du risque de diffusion des conflits ethniques : une application aux cas de l'Azerbaïdjan et de la Macédoine." Thesis, Université Laval, 2009. http://www.theses.ulaval.ca/2009/26324/26324.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Papazian, Taline. "Dynamique de conflit dans la construction d’un État contemporain : le cas de la République d’Arménie et de la question du Haut-Karabakh." Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011IEPP0007.

Full text
Abstract:
Cette recherche fait l’hypothèse que le conflit politique et militaire du Karabakh, opposant, depuis 1988, trois anciennes entités de l’URSS, une région autonome, le Haut-Karabakh, et deux républiques de l'Union, l’Azerbaïdjan et l’Arménie, est un déterminant essentiel de la construction de l’Etat arménien contemporain. Ce travail cherche à démontrer que la structure spécifique d’un conflit politico-militaire joue un rôle moteur dans une entreprise contemporaine de construction de l’Etat. D’une part, en tant que question nationale, le conflit du Karabakh est le moteur de l’élaboration d’une pensée et d’un projet politique national centré autour de l’Etat ; d’autre part, en tant que conflit armé, le conflit du Karabakh encourage la mise en place des institutions militaires et de sécurité de l’Etat. Le rapport du conflit du Karabakh et de l'Etat arménien est différent de celui d'une guerre de libération nationale résultant en la création d’Etats sur une base nationale : il consolide l’Etat arménien existant en indiquant des modalités de construction spécifiques. Depuis la première expérience d’Etat arménien moderne en 1918 jusqu’à celle contemporaine, le conflit du Karabakh est à la fois un déterminant majeur de la construction de l’Etat arménien, en même temps qu’il est un symptôme de la spécificité de la place de l’Etat dans ce nationalisme. Le rapport entre le conflit du Karabakh et la constitution de l’Etat arménien est considéré selon trois dimensions : statut politique d’une nation ; appareil garantissant la sécurité nationale ; et mode d’exercice du pouvoir politique, de manière analytique pour la période 1988-1999, et synthétique pour la période 1999-2008
The dissertation argues that the Karabakh conflict, a political and military conflict that has, since 1988, opposed three entities in the ex-USSR –the autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh and the two Union republics of Azerbaijan and Armenia- is a major factor in the building of the Armenian state. This research will seek to demonstrate that a specific type of political-military conflict plays a dynamic role in a contemporary endeavour of statehood building. On the one hand, as part of the national question, the Karabakh conflict has been the driving force of a state-centered political thinking and acting. On the other, as a military conflict, it led the crafting of such state institutions as were needed to ensure state security. Compared to national liberation wars leading to creation of states on a national basis, the relationship between the Karabakh conflict and the contemporary Armenian state is different: the conflict has not created the state; rather it has consolidated it in specific, conflict-induced ways. Since the first experience of a modern Armenian state in 1918 to the contemporary one, the Karabakh conflict is both a major determinant in state-building and a symptom of the state’s place in Armenian nationalism. The relationship between the Karabakh conflict and the Armenian state is interpreted along three dimensions: definition of a nation’s political status; creation of an apparatus ensuring national security; and mode of exercise of political power. This is done analytically for the period 1988-1999, 1999 being a rupture year, and synthetically for the period afterwards, from 1999 to 2008
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ritter, Laurence. "Les recompositions de l'identité arménienne, diaspora /Arménie : de la victime au sujet." Paris, EHESS, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005EHES0080.

Full text
Abstract:
Depuis le génocide de 1915, les Arméniens forment une diaspora. L'identité de cette diaspora est celle de la victime et de l'exil. En raison du refus de reconnaissance des faits par la Turquie, ce caractère victimaire se double de celui de victime niée. Les communautés de par le monde se sont partout reconstruites dans la mémoire de 1915. Le régime soviétique n'a pallié qu'en partie cette identité victimaire en Arménie même. A partir de 1970 - et dès avril 1965 en Arménie soviétique-, la revendication de la reconnaissance du génocide devient un mot d'ordre central. Les Arméniens font passer cette mémoire collective du crime de masse dans la sphère publique, interpellant autant leurs sociétés de résidence que la Turquie, y compris pour certains d'entre eux par le recours au terrorisme. Au tournant des années 80 et 90, le tremblement de terre en Arménie soviétique, le combat pour la récupération de l'enclave arménienne du Karabagh, l'indépendance de l'Arménie orientent la diaspora dans une nouvelle approche d'elle-même - et de ses relations à l'Etat comme à ses états de résidence. L'identité arménienne, en Arménie comme en diaspora, souffre encore de son ancrage victimaire et de définitions négatives de soi collectif, mais le passage de la victime au sujet est en cours, et devrait permettre aux définitions nationales et identitaires de se former ainsi qu'à des relations entre Etat et diaspora de se développer pour aboutir à un nouveau monde arménien
Since the genocide of 1915, the Armenians are a diaspora. The identity of this diaspora is an identity of victim marked with exile. Because of Turkey's refusal to acknowledge the facts, this victimized identity is also an identity of denied victim. Armenian communities worlwide rebuilt themselves within the frame of 1915's memory. The soviet regime in Armenia itself did onlys partly palliate this feeling. Starting from 1970's -as son as april 1965 in soviet Armenia_ the armenian's claim for the recognition of the genocide became central. The armanians bring their collective memory of mass murder into the public sphere, calling upon both their own societies and Turkey, including for a few of them by resorting to terrorism. At the turn of the 80's and the 90's, the earthquake in soviet Armenia, the fight for taking back the Armenian enclave of Karabagh, the independance of Armenia turn the diaspora into a new approach of itself- and about its relationships with both the state and its states of settlement. Both in Armenia and in the diaspora, the Armenian identity still suffers from its anchoring in victimized identity and of its negative self-definitions, but the passage from victim to subject is in process, and should allow to national definition and to the Armenian identity to get a new shape and also, to relationships between the state and the diaspora to develop and to create a new Armenian world
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sirin, Esil. "The Nagorno-karabakh Conflict And The Armenian Foreign Policy:1988-2007." Master's thesis, METU, 2007. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/2/12609155/index.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis analyses the impact of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict on the foreign policy of Armenia. It could be claimed that Armenia&rsquo
s relations with the other countries have been shaped by the Nagorno-Karabakh problem. The thesis demonstrates that because of this conflict, Armenian foreign policy has become more dependent on Russia and the Armenian diaspora in Russia, France and the United States despite its desire to be an independent state. Although Levon Ter-Petrossian and Robert Kocharian have advocated different foreign policies, their actions have been similar due to the impact of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The thesis has six main chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. The second chapter explores history of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. In the third chapter the Armenian foreign policy under Levon Ter-Petrossian is examined. The fourth chapter discusses the foreign policy of Robert Kocharian. In the fifth chapter the foreign policies of the Ter-Petrossian and Kocharian are compared. The sixth chapter is the conclusion.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

CHANG, SHIH-CHANG, and 張世昌. "The study of national conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh area(1988-1991)." Thesis, 1997. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04869972588290713622.

Full text
Abstract:
碩士
淡江大學
俄羅斯研究所
85
This is the first study of Nagorno-Karabakh's national conflict in domestic. Writer with David Easton's political system theory to research the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The conflict of Nagorno-Karabakh has so manyreasons, such as traditional,historical,political,religious,economical and cultural reasons...and so on. The period of this study is from 1988 to 1991.Because current conflict was from Feb.1988 and the post soviet union was break downin Dec.1991. Why the current conflict happened in Gorbachev's era? Which role did Gorbachev's political reform movements include PERESTROIKA,GLASNOST'and DEMOCR ITIZATION? Why international countries so concerned about the Nagorno-Karabakh area'snational conflict? Audior with six ch apters to research the program as follow : Chapter 1 : Introduction. Chapter 2 : The background of national conflict in Nagorno- Karabakh area. Chapter 3 : Analysis of fighters's structure : Armenia & Azerbaijan. Chapter 4 : Analysis of outside factors at Nagorno-Karabakh area's national conflict event. Chapter 5 : The model of Nagorno-Karabakh area's national conflict and Chapter 6 : Co its influence. Chapter 6 : Conclude.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh, 1988-1994"

1

Basic facts about Karabakh conflict. Yerevan: Antares, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Artsʻakhě chʻsandzats nzhuyg. Erevan: "Amaras", 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Mamyan, Ignat. Martnchʻogh leṛnahovit: Vep. Erevan: "Arayi Leṛ pʻrint" hratarakchʻutʻyun, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Aliev, Namik Gasan oglu. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i nagorno-karabakhskiĭ konflikt. Moskva: "Veche", 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Nagornyĭ Karabakh: Voĭna i politika, 1990-93 gg.; Voĭna v Nagornom Karabakhe i vnutreniĭ konflikt v armi︠a︡nskom obshchestve. Erevan: Armi︠a︡nskiĭ t︠s︡entr strategicheskikh i nat︠s︡tionalʹnykh issledovaniĭ, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Abuzărov, Abuzăr. Jăbrai̐ylyn găm karvany. Baky: Ulu, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Garegin, Ghazaryan, and Margaryan Sirvard, eds. Haghtʻanaknern, ichʻpes eghel en: Azdakanchʻ 44. Erevan: Hayastan Hanragitaran hratarakchʻutʻyun, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

John, Eibner, and Bonnėr Elena 1923-, eds. Ethnic cleansing in progress: War in Nagorno Karabakh. Zürich: Institute for Religious Minorities in the Islamic World, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

John, Eibner, and Bonnėr Elena 1923-, eds. Ethnic cleansing in progress: War in Nagorno Karabakh. London: Christian Solidarity Worldwide, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Atadzhani︠a︡n, V. A. Nagorno-Karabakhskai︠a︡ Respublika: Istorii︠a︡ i sovremennostʹ. Stepanakert: Fond obshchestvenno-politicheskoĭ informat︠s︡ii, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh, 1988-1994"

1

Lambert, Michael. "American Classified Paper of 1988 and the Case of Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict." In Between Peace and Conflict in the East and the West, 267–78. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77489-9_14.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractIn 1988, the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) declassified a research paper with the title, “Unrest in the Caucasus and the challenge of Nationalism” on the Nagorno-Karabakh autonomous oblast time when the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan was emerging. It lasted until 1994.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Koinova, Maria. "Armenian Diaspora Mobilization for Nagorno-Karabakh and Genocide Recognition." In Diaspora Entrepreneurs and Contested States, 213–42. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198848622.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter and the previous Chapter 8 are interconnected as they both discuss Armenian diaspora mobilizations. This chapter unravels the typological theory through five causal pathways. Mobilizations took place most often when host-state foreign policies diverged from the diaspora goals for Karabakh’s statehood, and Armenian genocide recognition. The most contentious pathway is associated with the response to violent critical events in the homeland, most notably the 1988 Sumgait pogrom and Karabakh war in the 1990s. Dual-pronged contention occurred when Armenia’s government clashed with the diaspora on issues of genocide recognition throughout the 1990s. Although the conflict diminished thereafter, the Armenian government has been reluctant to turn to the diaspora for political support in Europe, but it seeks it primarily for economic, social, and development projects. Dual-pronged contention also occurred when transnationalized parties mobilized for genocide recognition. For Dashnaks this has been the most important homeland-oriented goal. Other diaspora entrepreneurs lobbied and protested as well, even if they also mobilized on different social, cultural, and educational projects. Largely non-contentious activities followed political parties in France, leader of European efforts for genocide recognition, as well as when diaspora entrepreneurs acted on limited global influences, building business platforms, or engaging in medical, social, and economic support for Armenia and Karabakh.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh, 1988-1994"

1

Bulut, Cihan, Elchin Suleymanov, and Fakhri Hasanov. "Problems Encountered during the Transition to Market Economy in Azerbaijan and Solution Attempts." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c04.00681.

Full text
Abstract:
After re-gaining its independence on 18 October 1991, the Republic of Azerbaijan started to transform to the market-based economy and to integrate into the world economy. The country’s oil and natural gas reserves have been considered the main source for financing range of government programs for reforms. On the one hand, these reserves had to be used effectively; on the other hand, there was a huge demand for foreign investment for extraction. To this end, Azerbaijan has signed “Contract of the Century” in 1994. Although Azerbaijan has wide oil and natural gas reserves, it has faced a number of difficulties in its transition way. This study analyzes these problems and reforms for solving them. One of the types of the problems were related to the economic structure of the former Soviet Union: disruption of the economic ties between the republics resulted in decline of production, high levels of unemployment and prices and consequently led to an economic recession in all of the republics. Another set of problems was related to lack of sufficient institutional bases to transform to the market economy. Moreover, internal conflicts between the political parties and groups for having authority as well as political chaos in the republic can be considered other serious problems during the transition period. Furthermore, Karabakh war and occupation of 20 percent of the Azerbaijani territory by the Armenian military forces had made the situation extremely complicated. Despite all of these extremes, Azerbaijan transformed to the market-based economy decidedly and even became one of the fast growing countries of the world. Even in 2006, with the GDP growth rate of 34.5 percent, Azerbaijan was a leader among growing economies. In parallel with this significant economic development, there is still a need for some socio-economic and institutional reforms in order to get a well-functioned market-based economy in Azerbaijan.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Conflit du Nagorno-Karabakh, 1988-1994' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography