Academic literature on the topic 'CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS"
1
Shustrov, Dmitry. "Supra-constitutional norms in constitutional law." Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie 30, no. 1 (2021): 100–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2021-1-100-127.
Full textAbstract:
The idea of supra-constitutionality was formulated in the science of constitutional law in the second quarter of the 20th century and associated with the names of M.Hauriou and K.Schmitt, who for the first time noticed the possibility of the existence of norms that are higher than the constitution. This article is an attempt to give the doctrine of supra-constitutionality an actual theoretical and dogmatic meaning in the context of the study of the material limits of constitutional changes. The doctrine of supra-constitutionality claims to play an important role in explaining that unchangeable norms can exist in constitutional law and that they cannot be excluded, changed, limited, overcome, affected by the other sources of constitutional law, including the constitution itself. Supra-constitutionality is viewed as a characteristic of unchangeable constitutional norms that constitute the material limits of constitutional changes. Supra-constitutionality presupposes the existence of norms that surpass the rest of the constitutional norms and predetermine their content through the definition of what can, should and should not be included in the constitution or excluded from it. The basis of constitutional supra-constitutionality is the argument of hierarchical differentiation. In addition to recognizing unchangeable constitutional norms as supra-constitutional, the article raises the question of the existence of natural law and international law supra-constitutional norms. Natural law supra-constitutional norms have an external and non-positive character. They are not enshrined in the constitution, but stem from a reasonably understood concept of what is due in the most civilized societies, which is determined by the constitutional court. International law supra-constitutionality is understood as the superiority of the norms of international law over the constitution. It has an external and positive character. International law supra-constitutionality can cause political objections from opponents of the absolute rule of international law. Supra-constitutional constitutional, natural and international law norms can come into conflict with each other. The paradox of the doctrine of supra-constitutionality lies in the fact that it creates a hierarchy of norms within the constitution itself, distinguishing between simple and supra-constitutional constitutional norms, or distinguishes certain non-positive norms that are outside the constitution, as having priority over the constitution, or puts some norms of international law over all norms of national law, including the constitution. The purpose of the doctrine of supra-constitutionality is to preserve the inviolable fundamental (natural or generally recognized) values, which justifies its logical flaws and paradoxicality.
2
Barseghyan, Sose. "Manifestation of Direct Application of Constitutional Norms in the Field of Law Enforcement." Bulletin of Yerevan University C: Jurisprudence 14, no. 2 (39) (December 14, 2023): 61–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.46991/bysu:c/2023.14.2.061.
Full textAbstract:
The article refers to the application of constitutional norms by the courts and the interpretation given in the practice of the Constitutionl Court. In particular, the right of a person to seek judicial linitgation to protect his/her constitutional rights, the jurisdiction of the courts to apply the Constitution, the relantionship between the principle of supremacy of Constitution and the concept of implementantion of Constitution, the duty of ordinary courts to appeal to the Constitutional court and simultaneously justify unconstitutionality of a legislative norm, have become the subject of discussion. The article proposes an effective application of the constitutional nroms, introduction of flexible and applicable mechanisms for constitutional justice.
3
Protsevskiy, V. A., E. V. Gorlov, and S. A. Zaporozhets. "The Impact of Constitutional Norms and Principles on Constitutional Economics." Lex Russica, no. 5 (May 26, 2022): 89–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.186.5.089-097.
Full textAbstract:
The paper considers the problems of constitutional and legal regulation in the sphere of the Russian economy; the thesis that the Constitution of the Russian Federation defines the essential features of the economy is investigated and substantiated. On the one hand, the effectiveness of constitutional legal norms depends on the state of the economy, and on the other hand, it is possible to ensure the effectiveness of the economy only through constitutional norms (norms-principles).The paper examines the genesis of constitutional legal regulation in the field of economic relations. The norms and principles enshrined in the Soviet constitutions are analyzed. The foundations of the economic system in the Soviet period were characterized by the absence of private property rights, free competition and other economic principles. Proclamation of the new economic policy in the 20s of the 20th century entailed the formation and development of private law trends. Many of its supporters were subjected to repression in the 30s of the 20th century. The adoption of the new Constitution in 1993 led to the emergence of new directions in social development and the formation of principles in legal regulation in the economic sphere. The fundamental principles of the Constitution of the Russian Federation have the most powerful influence on the development of market relations. They determine the effectiveness of the state system, state regulation of the economy, establish the economic and social functions of the state. The place and role of the constitutional economy in the system of legal reality of Russia are determined. The constitutional foundations of the state are considered as elements of legal reality. The steady expansion of the subject of constitutional regulation in the aspect of economic relations is noted. The Constitution does not just set general standards for the regulation and development of the economic sphere, but influences the norms of other branches of law in such a way that they acquire constitutional and legal content and should be interpreted in the light of constitutional values.
4
Ali, Mohammad Mahrus. "Konstitusionalitas dan Legalitas Norma dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945." Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 1 (May 20, 2016): 172. http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/jk12110.
Full textAbstract:
The Constitutionality of norms are inseparable with the model of judicial review of laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. It can be see from the reviews of abstract and concrete norms by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The review of conrete norms in the decision of judicial review basically does not constitute authority of the Constitutional Court. Theoretically, norms review should be starting from abstract norms as the implications of the Constitutional Court authority. In order to review the constitutionality of laws, norms and abstract norms should be interpreted by the Constitutional Court. While concrete norms focuse more on the implementation or application of the norm itself. The application of norms cannot be separated from the legality of the norms, while constitutionality of norms is related to its coherence with with the Constitution. If the basis of norms review is the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia then abstract norms should be the main subject matter to be reviewed. Otherwise, when concrete norms are the subject matters to be reviewed, then the implementation of the norms that have been applied in concrete cases. This research is using normative juridical method with case approach in which 15 (fifteen) verdicts of the Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia over the period of 2003-2013 in judicial review of laws against the 1945 Constitution are analyzed. The focus is on the ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court judges in determining the constitutionality of norms. The result of this research shows that, the Constitutional Court, in the judicial review of laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not separate abstract norms and concrete norms dichotomously. In an attempt to protect the constitutional rights of citizens, the absence of legal remedies that can be further pursued by the applicant, as well as to provide legal certainty, the Constitutional Court, granted, in its decision, the review of concrete norms. Even though the Constitutional Court remains firm in satting that it is a concrete norms, the applicant’s petition is granted in part which is concerning the review the abstract norms only. Whereas, with respect to the verdict of the constitutional court that rejected the review of concrete norms, it is because the review is not on the constitutionality of norms but the application of the norms and also concerns a petition for an interlocutory decision which is irrelevant to the subject matter of the case. The review of concrete norms in a rejecting ruling is a form of prudence by the Constitutional Court in order not to prosecute the matters which constitute the authority the other judicial bodies, namely the Supreme Court and the lower courts. As for the ruling which declared a petition inadmissible, the Constitutional Court stated that the applicant has no legal standing and the Constitutional Court does not have the authority to test these norms. In the future the Constitutional Court needs to affirm the status of norms before further examining in depth the petition filed. In addition, the Constitutional Court should be conferred with the authority to hear constitutional complaint and constitutional question in order to create the harmonization of interpretation based on the Constitution.
5
Burazin, Luka, and Svan Relac. "Primjena Ustava od strane (hrvatskih) redovnih sudova." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 73, no. 5 (December 29, 2023): 841–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.5.02.
Full textAbstract:
The paper deals with the “application of the Constitutionˮ by ordinary courts. On the basis of literature review and preliminary Croatian case law research, six paradigmatic cases of the application of the Constitution by ordinary courts were selected (facts of the case directly regulated by constitutional rules, statutory gaps, avoidable in abstracto antinomies between constitutional and statutory norms, avoidable in concreto antinomies between constitutional and statutory norms, unconstitutionality of individual judicial and administrative decisions, and unavoidable in abstracto antinomies between constitutional and statutory norms). The cases selected were analyzed by using the method of argumentative analysis of judicial reasoning, within the framework of internal and external schemes of justification of judicial decisions, in examples (by and large) designed on the basis of Croatian case law.
6
Kowalik-Bańczyk, Krystyna. "Should We Polish It Up? The Polish Constitutional Tribunal and the Idea of Supremacy of EU Law." German Law Journal 6, no. 10 (October 1, 2005): 1355–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s207183220001436x.
Full textAbstract:
Just one year after Polish accession to the European Union, the Polish Constitutional Tribunal was provided the opportunity to clarify its position regarding the supremacy of EC and EU law. In its two recent judgments, it joined the long tradition of a rather uneasy relationship between national Constitutional Courts and European Court of Justice (ECJ). The uneasiness of this relationship results from an ever-unsolved dilemma – which of the two judicial fora should have the last word in case of conflict between European norms and national constitution norms? The solution given by European Court of Justice in a series of early judgments seems obvious. It opted for an absolute supremacy of EC norms over national norms. On the other hand, the national Constitutional Courts usually accept the supremacy of EC law - but only as a consequence of transfer of some competences under strict conditions set by national constitutions. They thus accept the concept named by Neil Walker “constitutional pluralism”, meaning that the states are no longer the sole source of constitutional authority. However, national constitutions are still the “primary” source of any such authority.
7
Sychev, Vitalii B. "Content and forms of participation of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in lawmaking." Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series Economics. Management. Law 21, no. 2 (May 25, 2021): 223–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2021-21-2-223-231.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction. The judicial constitutional review authorities ensure the supremacy and direct application of the constitutions. They also participates in lawmaking activities. Constitutional review authorities can participate in lawmaking activities directly or circumstantially. There are two kinds of the direct participation of such authorities in lawmaking activities: legislative initiative and participation in lawmaking activities in connection with the implementation of the constitutional review. The methodology of research is based on general scientific and special legal research methods. Theoretical analysis. Some authors note that the decisions of the constitutional review authorities can modify conditions of public life. Authors often emphasize that court decisions that rules certain norms as unconstitutional have the same goals as statutory acts. Empirical analysis. Constitutional courts administer a special kind of lawmaking, such as “positive”, “negative”, “adjusting” and “interpretative” lawmaking. “Positive” lawmaking is connected with the adoption of statutory acts, which regulate the activities of the constitutional courts. “Negative” lawmaking consists in ruling certain legal norms and sources of law unconstitutional and making them void. By means of “adjusting” lawmaking constitutional courts do not rule the norms as completely unconstitutional, but constitutionally interpret them. “Interpretative” lawmaking consists in clarifying legal norms of constitutions. The constitutional review authorities may also provide recommendations to the legislative authorities. Results. The constitutional review authorities can directly participate in lawmaking activities as a legislative initiative or in connection with the implementation of the constitutional control as “positive”, “negative”, “adjusting” and “interpretative” lawmaking. Circumstantial participation of such authorities in lawmaking activities is administered by adopting special messages.
8
Medvid, A. B. "Constitutional metamorphosis: analysis of amendment procedures to the Basic Law in the context of global transformations." Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, no. 6 (December 27, 2023): 142–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.06.24.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the study of constitutional metamorphoses in the context of global transformations, in particular the analysis of the procedures for introducing changes to the basic law in different countries of the world. Modifications in modern geopolitical, economic and socio-cultural conditions caused the need to revise and adapt constitutional norms in order to bring the latter to the requirements of modern challenges and realities.
Thescientific article examinesvarious approaches to the legal mechanism of amending constitutions in countries with various legal traditions and political systems. The author conducts a comparative analysis of such procedures, paying attention to legislative initiatives, the role of parliament, the participation of civil society and other aspects.
It has been shown that the key aspects of the modification of constitutions are the following issues: a) legitimacy of foundations and subjects that initiate the process of constitutional reform and have the authority to make changes to the constitution; b) the content of constitutional changes and the threshold at which amendments to the constitution introduce transformations into its principles and essence; c) characteristics of legal mechanisms and procedures (models) for amending constitutions, which, on the one hand, guarantee the legitimacy of updated constitutions, and on the other hand, serve as a legal barrier against "constitutional extremism”, that is, unfounded and dangerous for the individual, society and states by constitutional transformations.
It is emphasized that in the context of constitutional metamorphoses, the following forms of transformation of constitutions should be distinguished: a) amendments to basic laws; b) introduction of amendments to the constitutions; c) change of constitutions.
It has been established that constitutional metamorphoses in the context of global transformations indicate radical changes and transformations in the constitutional system of various countries or even at the world level, in particular: globalization of constitutional norms; expansion of the catalog of rights and freedoms; changes in the system of the power mechanism; ecological constitutional protection; constitutional innovation; global constitutional standards.
9
Pustovalova, I. "The Constitution as a constituent document on the economic system of society." Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, no. 69 (April 15, 2022): 65–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2021.69.10.
Full textAbstract:
The article discusses the doctrinal definition of the potential capabilities of the constitution to establish the principles of the economic system of society, the relevant normative tools with which the constitutionalization of the economic system takes place, and it also turns out how the backbone (constituent) norms relating to the economic system are presented in the constitutions of various "generations". Based on the results of the study, the conclusion is substantiated that the impact of the constitution on the economy is most tangibly manifested in the intersection of the constituent and economic functions of the constitution. The author argues that the implementation of the constituent function of the constitution in relation to the economic system of the country is carried out through a number of so-called specialized norms or atypical legal prescriptions. In particular, the establishment (establishment) of the economic system at the level of the main law is carried out with the help of norms-goals, norms-tasks and norms-principles. All these norms have a backbone (constituent) character in relation to the economic system and give a general purposeful nature to the law enforcement process in this area. The article emphasizes that the system-forming (constituent) norms related to the economic system can be presented in the preamble, as well as structural parts devoted to the principles of the constitutional order or specifically the constitutional principles of the country's economic system. The author notes that the system-forming (constituent) norms relating to the economic system are most widely represented in the constitutions adopted in the period from the end of the Second World War to the present, that is, in the constitutions of the third and fourth generations. This is due to the strengthening of state influence on the economy, the complication of the economic policy of the state and the expansion of the subject of constitutional and legal regulation.
10
Fedorenko, V. L., and M. V. Fedorenko. "Principles of constitutional law: essence, content and system." ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF THE LEGAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CONDITIONS OF WAR AND THE POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STATE, no. 13 (October 1, 2022): 160–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2022-13-25.
Full textAbstract:
The publication is devoted to identifying the essence and content of the category of “principle of constitutional law” and identifying its relationship with related but not identical categories: values, ideals, foundations, principles, objectives, mandatory rules, laws, etc. Genesis and development of ideas about the principles of constitutional law and their consolidation in constitutions and constitutional acts are analyzed. The systematization of the main types of relevant principles and groups is carried out: principles of constitutionalism and constitutional doctrine, principles of science and education of constitutional law, principles of the constitution, as well as principles of constitutional law-making, law enforcement and justice (jurisdictional) activities. It is argued that modern constitutions enshrine in the norms-principles the most important values of the constitutional order: the rule of law, rule of law, freedom and democracy, the inviolability of fundamental human rights, etc. But their real embodiment presupposes unification and interaction of civil society with the state. Key words: principle, principle of constitutional law, system of principles of constitutional law, principle of constitutionalism, principle of the Constitution, principles of the science of constitutional law.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS"
1
Wesemann, Anne. "Constitutional rights norms in the European Union legal framework : an analysis of European Union citizenship as a constitutional right." Thesis, University of Sussex, 2018. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/80444/.
Full text
2
Surin, Serge. "Les travaux préparatoires dans l'interprétation constitutionnelle finaliste des normes : essai de définition, perspective historique d’un débat juridique ancien, signification et effet d’une stratégie interprétative jurisprudentielle en droit constitutionnel." Thesis, Paris 1, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA01D054.
Full textAbstract:
L'interprétation constitutionnelle est une question récurrente dans le monde moderne. Le droit étant sujet à interprétation de la part de tout un chacun (juges, doctrine, simples citoyens), au point que «Juristes et simples citoyens acceptent et affirment (ou mettent en doute et refusent) des propositions sur ce que «dit le droit» de leur nation ou de leur État» (Ronald Dworkin). La question se pose de savoir qui, parmi ces différents acteurs, est le plus légitime pour affirmer une interprétation finaliste du droit s'imposant à tous. Au centre de cette interrogation, se trouve le juge constitutionnel, interprète habilité, ses jugements et les critiques visant ceux-ci. Mais l'interprétation prononcée par ce juge est parfois, voire souvent, mal acceptée, ce qui participe à l'affaiblissement de son autorité dans un système juridique concurrentiel marqué par le pluralisme tant au stade de la procédure de production qu'à celui de l'application du droit. Ainsi, si le juge a le privilège du rôle de juger, il a aussi la nécessaire vocation à être à son tour jugé. Cette nécessité s'explique par le fait que«Tout pouvoir est méchant dès qu'on le laisse faire [mais devient] sage dès qu'il se sent jugé.» (Alain). Dans ce contexte, la question de méthodes et outils utilisés par le juge-interprète devient elle aussi centrale car ceux-ci sont scrutés par tous, souvent au détriment d travail interprétatif complexe de ce juge. Parmi les outils et méthodes d'interprétation utilisés par celui-ci, se trouve l'usage des travaux préparatoires. En tant que supports d'une méthode d'interprétation juridique, ceux-ci posent problème. Au-delà de la question de la définition de la notion de travaux préparatoires, il convient de s'interroger sur le rôle, la force et la valeur de ces derniers dans l'interprétation constitutionnelle. Ainsi, cette thèse se donne pour objectif de tenter, du moins, d'apporter un début de réponse à ce questions, à travers une réflexion d'ensemble sur cette méthode d'interprétation dont le débat remonte, du moins, au Moyen AgeConstitutional interpretation has become a recurrent issue in modern world. Since the law is subject to interpretation by anyone (judges, doctrine. ordinary citizens), so that "jurists and ordinary citizens accept and affirm (or doubt and refuse) proposals on what the 'law says' of their nation or their state" (Ronald Dworkin), the question is who, among these various actors, is the most legitimate to affirm a finalist interpretation of the law imposing itself on everyone. At the center of this question is the constitutional judge, the empowered interpreter, his judgments and the criticisms raised by the latter. But the judge's interpretation is sometimes. even often, poorly accepte1 which contributes to the weakening of his authority in a competitive legal system marked by pluralism, bath at the stage of the production procedure and al that of the application of the law. Thus, if the judge has the privilege to judge, he also has the necessary vocation to b in turn judged. This necessity is explained by the fact that "Ali power is wicked as long as it can, [but becomes] wise when it feels judged (Alain). In such a context, the question of methods and tools used by the interpreting judge also becomes central because the latter are scrutinized by everyone, often at the expense of the complex interpretative work of the judge. Among these tools and methods c interpretation used by the judge is the use of preparatory work (Hansard). As the basis of a legal interpretation method, the latter become problematic. Beyond the question of the definition of the concept of preparatory work, it should be raised the questions of the role, fore and value of the latter in constitutional interpretation. Thus, this paper aims to try to give an initial answer to these questions, through general reflection on this interpretation method that has been debated, at least, from the Middle Ages
3
Bokolombe, Bompondo Godefroid. "Le juge constitutionnel et l'application des normes internationales et régionales de protection des droits fondamentaux : étude comparative des droits français, allemand et sud-africain." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016AIXM1004.
Full textAbstract:
La réception des normes internationales et régionales en droit interne s’opère selon des modalités que les États ont définies. La doctrine en a dégagé deux principes : moniste et dualiste, qui reposent sur une vision statique de la société et du droit dans la mesure où ils s’opposent au principe pacta sunt servanda qui fait peser sur l'État l’obligation d'exécuter de bonne foi les engagements qu'il souscrit. Les normes internationales et régionales ne se contentent plus de régler les relations entre États ou d’organiser des relations commerciales, financières, économiques entre agents producteurs et consommateurs ; il s’intéresse progressivement au pouvoir politique de chacun des États et à la manière dont les droits fondamentaux sont prévus et respectés. Ces droits dont la protection sur le plan interne revient au juge constitutionnel facilitent en conséquence l’agencement et l’harmonisation de différents systèmes. Ce rôle charnière des droits fondamentaux dans l’articulation des normes d’origines diverses résulte en grande partie de l’universalisme de ces droits. Les rapports entre le droit international et régional, d’une part, et le droit interne, d’autre part, dépassent désormais l’approche binaire monisme – dualisme et s’ouvre sur un pluralisme constructif. La protection des droits fondamentaux s’opère sur le mode du réseau et non plus sur celui de la pyramide. Reste à organiser ce pluralisme. Il s’observe l’émergence du « trans-constitutionnalisme » qui peut être défini comme un ordre des ordres juridiques fondé sur l'harmonisation spontanée. Chaque ordre aspire à devenir un modèle pour les autres et chaque modèle s'inspire de celui des autresThe integration of international regional norms in national law is based on methods defined by the State. Doctrine has shaped two principles, monism and dualism, that rely on an essentially static vision of both society and law, as they are contrary to the pacta sunt servanda principle that binds the State. The State is obliged to execute in good faith all obligations it binds itself to. International and regional norms are no longer limited to inter-state relations or regulating, through extremely technical treaties; they are more and more dealing with the political power of each state and the manner in which fundamental rights are provided for and respected. On a national level, it is up to the constitutional judge to ensure respect of these rights that facilitate, therefore, the organising and harmonising of different systems. This role of “connector” that fundamental rights have in the context of interaction between norms of various origins results, to a great extent, in the universality of these aforementioned rights. The link between international and regional rights, on the one hand, and national law, on the other, surpasses the binary approach of monism – dualism and opens the door to a constructive pluralism, both from the point of view of the content of the rights, and from the point of view of the institutions that are entrusted with their protection. Therefore, the protection of fundamental rights functions through a system of a network, and no longer based on the pyramid model. Remains for this pluralism to be organised. The emergence of « transconstitutionalism » can be observed, as an order of legal orders, based on spontaneous harmonisation
4
JUNIOR, PAULO ABRAO PIRES. "THE CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS OF RESOURCES DESTINATIONS AS A WARRANTY TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EDUCATION RIGHT." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2009. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=17017@1.
Full textAbstract:
Esta tese versa sobre o direito à educação e o seu financiamento público.
Mais especificamente as normas constitucionais de vinculações de recursos para a
educação. O estudo explicita a estrutura e o modo de funcionamento das
vinculações de recursos para a educação, previstas na Constituição da República
de 1988 e problematiza seus resultados e críticas. Em seguida faz uma análise
sobre papel que a educação exerce para o cumprimento das promessas da
modernidade a partir da teoria do reconhecimento para verificar as razões
justificadoras da inserção de um mecanismo de proteção jurídica prioritária para o
direito à educação. Por último, defende as normas constitucionais de vinculações
de recursos para a educação como uma garantia para efetividade do direito à
educação e explora quais as interfaces que esta leitura acarreta aos sistemas dos
direitos sociais, da separação de poderes e da federação.This thesis is about the right to education e its public financing. More specifically the constitutional norms of ties resources to education. The study explicits the structure and the functioning of the resources destination to education previewed in Brazilian’s Constitution of 1998 and problematizes its results and critics. Right after it is made an analysis on the role that education has to the reach of modernity’s promises taking recognition’s theory as starting premises so to verify the justifying reasons for the inclusion of a differentiated juridical protection mechanism of education’s right. At the end, the thesis defends the constitutional norms that establishes resources with specific destination to education as a warranty to the right of education and explores the interfaces that this interpretation implies into the social rights systems, to the principle of power separation and federalism.
5
Flynn, Thomas Joseph Sheridan. "Universality of interface norms under constitutional pluralism : an analysis of Ireland, the EU and the ECHR." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/9865.
Full textAbstract:
The theory of constitutional pluralism suggests that interacting legal orders that are (or claim to be) constitutional in nature need not—and should not—necessarily be regarded as being hierarchically arranged, with one ‘on top of’ the others. Rather, the relationships between the orders can be conceived of heterarchically. However, there is an assumption in much of the literature that the ‘interface norms’ that regulate the relationships within such a heterarchy are universal by nature, capable of undifferentiated application across differing constitutional orders. This thesis examines whether interface norms are in fact universal by nature, or whether they are relationship- and context-dependent, taking as its field of study three interacting legal orders—those of Ireland, the European Union, and the European Convention on Human Rights. It uses an established model of constitutional pluralism based on ‘coordinate constitutionalism’ to test the assumption of universality across three constitutional frames: the ‘vertical’ relationship between Ireland and the European orders, the ‘horizontal’ relationship between the European orders, and the ‘triangular’ panoply of state, Union and Convention. Having analysed the interface norms at work in these relationships, both in isolation and in the round, the thesis concludes that these norms are not in fact universal, and that different conceptions of constitutional pluralism need to pay much greater attention to the specific nature of any given constitutional order and its relationship with other orders in the constitutional heterarchy.
6
Heitzmann-Patin, Mathilde. "Les normes de concrétisation dans la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel." Thesis, Paris 1, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA01D008.
Full textAbstract:
A partir de l'étude des décisions du Conseil constitutionnel, la recherche porte sur l'exercice d'une technique particulière d'interprétation des normes de référence par le juge constitutionnel. De ces interprétations spécifiques résulte l'élaboration, par le juge, des normes de concrétisation. Les normes de concrétisation sont fondées expressément sur les normes de référence du contrôle de constitutionnalité et des lois et en constituent un mode d'emploi. Elles forment des normes juridiques infra-constitutionnelles dont certaines s'imposent au législateur et d'autres s'imposent au juge constitutionnel lui-même. En effet, une première catégorie indique au législateur les critères qu'il doit respecter pour que les dispositions législatives qu'il adopte soient conformes aux normes de référence. Une seconde catégorie établit des méthodes que le juge constitutionnel va utiliser dans le cadre du contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois. Ces règles nouvelles concrétisent les normes de référence à deux niveaux. D'abord, elles précisent leur contenu. Ensuite, elles facilitent leur application. Les normes de concrétisation sont alors un outil jurisprudentiel qui constitue une règle de droit. Par ces différentes caractéristiques, elles permettent au juge à la fois d'élargir ses compétences et de stabiliser sa jurisprudenceBased on the analysis of the French Constitutional Council case law, this research studies a specific technique which the constitutional judge uses when interpreting reference norms. Doing so, the constitutional judge creates concretization norms. Concretization norms are built on reference norms of the constitutional law review, and can be viewed as a user manual of these norms. They are infra-constitutional norms. Some of them are binding to the legislator while other command the constitutional judge itself. Indeed, one category establishes the criteria the legislator must follow in order to pass laws in compliance with the Constitution. A second category establishes methods which the constitutional judge will use when proceeding to the constitutional law review. These news rules are a concretization of reference norms on two levels. First, they specify the content of these norms. Second, they facilitate their application. Hence, concretization norms are a judicial tool and a legal norm. Through all these characteristics, concretization norms are used by the constitutional judge in order to extend its jurisdiction but also to stabilize its case law
7
Conway, Gerard Martin. "Conflict of norms in European Union law and the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice." Thesis, Brunel University, 2010. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5235.
Full textAbstract:
This thesis examines the topic of conflict of norms in European Union (EU) law and the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), arguing that the framework of conflict of norms provides conceptual insight into justification and the role of value choices in legal reasoning. After examining the theory of conflict of norms, which seems to have been relatively under-studied generally and especially in EU law, it examines three particular aspects of norm conflict resolution in the legal reasoning of the ECJ and EU law: conflict of interpretative norms, especially the opposition between conserving and innovative interpretation; conflicts of human rights norms, looking in particular at the idea of a hierarchy of rights and of specificationism in the articulation of rights; and conflicts of competence norms. It concludes that the scope exists for a fuller justification of the choice of norms in the legal reasoning of the ECJ and generally in EU law and offers a perspective on how the values articulated by the EU suggest particular approaches to norm conflict resolution by the ECJ in its decision-making in these fields, in particular, a greater resort to lex specialis and originalist or historical interpretation, in contrast to its current method.
8
Queiroz, Caúla Bleine. "A aplicabilidade das normas constitucionais ambientais à luz dos ordenamentos brasileiro e português." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/460886.
Full textAbstract:
La tesi doctoral té com a principal objectiu l'anàlisi de l'aplicabilitat de les normes constitucionals ambientals i dels obstacles als quals s'enfronta la seva efectivitat. La investigació es circumscriu als ordenaments jurídics del Brasil i Portugal, en raó que en les respectives constitucions es regula el dret a un medi ambient sa i la seva aproximació històrica-cultural presenta un atractiu afegit per observar com ambdues regulacions han coexistit paral·lelament a una realitat canviant. Els ordenaments d’aquests països han experimentat una comunicació constant dels seus sistemes constitucionals i si bé la determinació d'un dret a un medi ambient sa en tots dos casos ha demostrat ser prematura en la seva configuració, en termes espacials i temporals, els problemes seculars inherents han estat visiblement diversos i amb riscos atemporals, que han determinat la seva efectivitat. En els seus aspectes metodològics, els propòsits són exploratoris i descriptius. La internacionalització i, per tant, la constitucionalització de les normes ambientals han contribuït a la configuració atemporal del dret a un medi ambient. La indeterminació de l'aplicació temporal d'aquest dret no ha estat un obstacle perquè tant en el cas del Brasil com en el Portugal, el legislador constituent hagi ratificat la responsabilitat de tots els actors socials, promovent així una major efectivitat d'aquest dret. La resposta a la hipòtesi sobre el règim jurídic per a l'aplicabilitat de les normes constitucionals ambientals confirma la seva aproximació al nucli dels drets fonamentals i, en conseqüència, del règim jurídic especial de protecció d'aquests. En definitiva, la present tesi doctoral, mitjançant l'anàlisi comparativa, defensa un règim d'aplicabilitat immediata de les normes constitucionals del dret fonamental a un medi ambient sa, per procurar la seva efectivitat jurídica, en benefici de les generacions presents i futures i com a paradigma transformador d'un model de desenvolupament, altament depredador dels recursos naturals.La tesis doctoral tiene como principal objetivo el análisis de la aplicabilidad de las normas constitucionales ambientales y de los obstáculos a los que se enfrenta su efectividad. La investigación se circunscribe a los ordenamientos jurídicos de Brasil y Portugal, en razón de que en sus respectivas constituciones se regula el derecho a un medio ambiente sano y su aproximación histórica-cultural presenta un atractivo añadido para observar como ambas regulaciones han coexistido paralelamente a una realidad cambiante. Los ordenamientos de estos países han experimentado una comunicación constante de sus sistemas constitucionales y si bien la determinación de un derecho al ambiente sano en ambos casos ha demostrado ser prematura en su configuración, en términos espaciales y temporales, los problemas seculares inherentes han sido visiblemente diversos y con riesgos atemporales, que han determinado su efectividad. En sus aspectos metodológicos, los propósitos son exploratorios y descriptivos. La internacionalización y la constitucionalización de las normas ambientales han contribuido a la configuración atemporal del derecho a un medio ambiente. La indeterminación de la aplicación temporal de este derecho no ha sido un obstáculo, en el caso de Brasil y el Portugal, el legislador constituyente haya ratificado la responsabilidad de todos los actores sociales, promoviendo así una mayor efectividad de este derecho. La respuesta a la hipótesis sobre el régimen jurídico para la aplicabilidad de las normas constitucionales ambientales confirma su aproximación al núcleo de los derechos fundamentales y, en consecuencia, del régimen jurídico especial de protección de estos. En definitiva, la presente tesis doctoral, mediante el análisis comparativo, defiende un régimen de aplicabilidad inmediata de las normas constitucionales del derecho fundamental a un medio ambiente sano, para procurar su efectividad jurídica, en beneficio de las generaciones presentes y futuras y como paradigma transformador de un modelo de desarrollo, altamente depredador de los recursos naturales.
The main objective of doctoral thesis is the analysis of the applicability of the constitutional norms environmental and the obstacles that face its effectiveness. The research is focused on the legal systems of Brazil and Portugal, because both regulate the right to a healthy environment in their respective constitutions and their historical-cultural approach offers an added attraction to observe how both regulations have coexisted parallel in a context of changing reality. The laws of these countries have experienced the constant communication of their constitutional systems, and although the determination of a right to a healthy environment in both cases has proved premature in its configuration, in spatial and temporal terms, the inherent secular problems have been visibly diverse and with timeless risks that have determined its effectiveness. In its methodological aspects, the purposes of the research are exploratory and descriptive. Internationalization and, therefore, the constitutionalisation of environmental norms have contributed to the timeless configuration of the right to a healthy environment. The indeterminacy of the temporary implementation of this right has not been an obstacle to the fact that in the case of Brazil as in Portugal, the constituent legislator has ratified the responsibility of all social actors, thus promoting a greater effectiveness of this right. The answer to the research hypothesis on the legal regime for the implementation of the constitutional environmental norms confirms its approach to the core of fundamental rights and, consequently, the special legal regime of protection. In short, through a comparative analysis, this dissertation defends a regime of immediate applicability of the constitutional norms, regarding to the fundamental right to a healthy environment, in order to ensure its legal effectiveness, for the benefit of present and future generations and as a transformative paradigm of a development model, highly predatory to natural resources.
9
Sterck, Julien. "Identité constitutionnelle des États membres et primauté du droit de l'Union européenne : étude comparée de l'Irlande et de la France." Thesis, Bordeaux 4, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013BOR40009/document.
Full textAbstract:
La notion d’identité constitutionnelle permet de qualifier le positionnement respectif des ordres juridiques irlandais et français face à la primauté du droit de l’Union européenne. Comparé à la jurisprudence européenne, leurs régimes constitutionnels relatifs à ce droit externe n’offrent qu’une immunité et affirme in fine la suprématie de la Constitution en tant qu’expression de la souveraineté nationale. Pourtant, les juridictions des deux pays montrent une attitude conciliante fondée sur une relation de contenu entre normes constitutionnelles et européennes. Plutôt qu’un essentialisme, la notion d’identité constitutionnelle représente un discours portant sur la Constitution suivant lequel une qualité identitaire est reconnue aux normes constitutionnelles susceptibles de mettre en échec les dispositions dédiées à la primauté des normes européennes au terme d’une interprétation les mettant en balance.Malgré des affirmations différentes de leur souveraineté nationale, l’accroissement du contrôle de l’application du droit européen est un objectif commun dans la jurisprudence des deux pays. La dynamique institutionnelle qui caractérise le processus interprétatif qu’implique la notion d’identité constitutionnelle privilégie les juridictions et mène à une forme singulière de dialogue avec la Cour européenne de justice conciliant primauté du droit européen et suprématie de la Constitution. Les monologues menant à une exclusion de l’application du droit européen au nom de l’identité constitutionnelle sont une invitation faite à la juridiction européenne pour établir une coexistence pacifique entre les ordres juridiques définie par une union de mots dans une diversité de sensComparing the Irish and French legal orders leads to describe the appraisal of the primacy of European Union law by the notion constitutional identity. In contrast to the claims of the European Court of Justice, the constitutional regime regarding European rules, both in Irish and French law, only provides for immunity and ultimately affirms the supremacy of the Constitution as the norm expressing national sovereignty. Still, Irish and French courts display a conciliatory attitude focused on aligning the material content of domestic and European norms. Rather than essentialism, the notion of constitutional identity represents a discourse on the Constitution whereby the identity status qualifies those constitutional norms which can defeat constitutional provisions dedicated to the prevalence of European rules as a result of an interpretative balancing process.While manifesting different affirmations of national sovereignty, the common objective of Irish and French courts is attaining increased control of the application of European Union rules. The institutional dynamics distinguishing the notion of constitutional identity as an interpretative process involve both an empowerment of the judiciary and a specific form of dialogue with the European Court of Justice regarding the conciliation between the primacy of European Union law and the supremacy of the Constitution. Judicial monologues protecting constitutional identity mean possible exclusions of the domestic application of European law and constitute an invitation to the European Court of Justice to agree to a peaceful co-existence of the two legal orders defined as a unity of words with a diversity of meanings
10
Silva-Arroyave, Sergio-Orlando. "La suprématie interprétative des juridictions constitutionnelles : étude comparée en droit français et colombien." Thesis, Paris 2, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA020026.
Full textAbstract:
Les juridictions constitutionnelles ont sans doute de larges compétences interprétatives. Toutefois, l’ampleur de ces compétences varie dans les différents ordres juridiques selon l’aptitude que les autres organes et autorités de l’Etat peuvent adopter devant ces interprétations. Une juridiction constitutionnelle a une suprématie interprétative dans un Etat en particulier si ses interprétations doivent être obligatoirement respectées et appliquées par tous les autres organes et autorités de l’Etat. Si ses interprétations sont seulement obligatoires pour quelques autorités, cette juridiction constitutionnelle a simplement une compétence interprétative supérieure vis-à-vis de ces autorités. Afin d’identifier les plus larges compétences interprétatives des juridictions constitutionnelles, la démarche comparative est hautement recommandée parce qu’elle permet de distinguer plus facilement les limitations que ces juridictions peuvent rencontrer dans leurs ordres juridiques respectifs. Ainsi, en suivant cette démarche, seront identifiées l’ampleur des compétences interprétatives des juridictions constitutionnelles française et colombienne et leurs répercussions dans chacun de leurs EtatsConstitutional jurisdictions should have wide interpretative powers. However, the scope of these competences varies in different legal systems depending on the ability of other authorities to adopt such interpretations. A constitutional court has interpretative supremacy in a particular State, if its interpretations are binding for all other departments of the State. If its interpretations are just binding for some authorities, this constitutional court would simply have a superior interpretative competence toward those authorities. In order to determine the broader interpretative powers of the constitutional courts, the comparative approach is highly recommended because it makes easier to distinguish the limitations that these jurisdictions may encounter in their respective legal systems. In this way, the scope of the interpretative powers of the French and Colombian constitutional courts will be identified as well as their repercussions in each of its states
Books on the topic "CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS"
1
Shou jiao yu quan xian fa gui fan lun: Right to education in view of constitutional norms. Beijing Shi: Fa lü chu ban she, 2012.
Find full text
2
Wang, Lei. Xian fa ping deng gui fan de quan shi guan: Li nian, gui fan yu shi jian = An interpretation of the norm of constitutional equality : concepts, norms and practice. Beijing Shi: Fa lü chu ban she, 2008.
Find full text
3
Oellers-Frahm, Karin. Review of constitutionality of legal norms and acts of public authorities in the Federal Republic of Germany. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Juristicher Verlag, 1986.
Find full text
4
Argentina. Normas constitucionales argentinas. Mendoza: Ediciones Jurídicas Cuyo, 1999.
Find full text
5
Programa Nacional de Gobernabilidad (Bolivia) and Inter-American Development Bank, eds. Digesto, normas del sistema político boliviano: Poder legislativo. La Paz, Bolivia: PRONAGOB/BID, 2002.
Find full text
6
Rica, Costa. Constitución política de la República de Costa Rica: Disposiciones transitorias, historia constitucional, norma abrogada : 7 de noviembre de 1949. Costa Rica: Duplicadoras de Costa Rica, S.A., 1991.
Find full text
7
Vargas, Alan Bronfman, and Antonio Carlos Pereira Menaut. Constitución española, estatutos de autonomía y principales normas de interés constitucional. Madrid: Editorial Colex, 1998.
Find full text
8
La constitución de 1946 y la constituyente que le dió origen: Análisis del proceso de formación de las normas constitucionales de 1946. Panamá: Litho Editorial Chen, 2014.
Find full text
9
Rostbøll, Christian F. Human rights, popular sovereignty and freedom: A study of the basic norms of the constitutional and democratic welfare-state, based on a discussion of Hannah Arendt and Jürgen Habermas. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Political Studies Press, 1998.
Find full text
10
Silva, José Afonso da. Aplicabilidade das normas constitucionais. 7th ed. São Paulo, SP: Malheiros Editores, 2007.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS"
1
Guelke, Adrian. "Constitutional Change and International Norms." In Can South Africa Survive?, 255–80. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19661-6_12.
Full text
2
Moreso, José Juan. "Legal Norms and Legal System." In Legal Indeterminacy and Constitutional Interpretation, 3–45. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9123-2_2.
Full text
3
Menéndez, Agustín José. "In Capital We Trust: The Eurozone: A Congeries of Material Norms Without a Constitution?" In The Political Dimension of Constitutional Law, 159–80. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38459-3_9.
Full text
4
Guichard, Justine. "Transitioning by Amendment: The 1987 Revision of Constitutional Norms and Institutions." In Regime Transition and the Judicial Politics of Enmity, 23–46. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137531575_2.
Full text
5
Adebanjo, Adetoun, and Ebenezer Durojaye. "International Human Rights Norms and Standards on Derogation and Limitation of Rights During a Public Emergency." In Constitutional Resilience and the COVID-19 Pandemic, 79–109. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06401-2_2.
Full text
6
Kotzé, Louis J. "Constitutional Conversations in the Anthropocene: In Search of Environmental Jus Cogens Norms." In Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 241–71. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_9.
Full text
7
Elangovan, Arvind. "Moment of Utopia." In Norms and Politics, 163–92. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199491445.003.0005.
Full textAbstract:
In 1946, Rau was appointed as the Constitutional Advisor to the newly formed Constituent Assembly. In this capacity, Rau collated and solicited constitutional ideas from members of the Constituent Assembly and put forward his own as well. In these drafts, one gets a clear sense of Rau’s constitutional thoughts, which was a direct response to the political conflicts that unfolded outside the Constituent Assembly. Rau saw the constitution only as a means to an end, which was ‘development’. In pursuit of this goal, Rau wished for a largely powerful head of the state with wide discretionary powers and a legislature and executive that would be committed to ideas of development. While protecting minority interests were paramount, perhaps, most controversially, Rau privileged the Directive Principles—ideas that needed to guide the lawmakers—rather than the granting of Fundamental Rights.
8
Elangovan, Arvind. "Conclusion." In Norms and Politics, 237–47. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199491445.003.0007.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter summarizes the main arguments of the book and argues that we can only forget the political history that went into the making of the Indian constitution at our own peril. It points out that political history matters, and the political history of the Indian constitution, perhaps matters even more. By recovering the work of the largely forgotten bureaucrat Sir B.N. Rau and locating his constitutional thought and contributions at variance and indeed in tension with the process of constitution making, the book strives to underscore the importance of studying political histories when thinking about the history of the Indian constitution.
9
Inceoğlu, Sibel. "Constitutional Conflict and the Idea of New Constitution in Turkey." In Norms, Interests, and Values, 159–80. Nomos, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845247380-159.
Full text
10
Dixon, Rosalind, and David Landau. "The Concept and Scope of Abusive Constitutional Borrowing." In Abusive Constitutional Borrowing, 36–55. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.003.0003.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter elaborates the book’s concept of abusive constitutional borrowing, which is defined as the use of designs, doctrines, and concepts associated with liberal democratic constitutionalism for anti-democratic ends. All forms of abusive borrowing decouple the form of a norm from its substance, but in different ways. The chapter develops a typology of four subtypes of abusive borrowing—(1) sham borrowing, which takes the form of a norm without its substance; (2) selective borrowing, where borrowers use only part of a norm or package of norms; (3) acontextual borrowing, where a norm is intentionally transplanted into a context with different background conditions; and (4) anti-purposive borrowing, where an anti-democratic norm is repurposed to achieve the opposite of its intended purpose. Changes in the form and substance of norms are common with all borrowing, but the hallmark of abusive borrowing is that it undertakes these mutations to maximize anti-democratic impact.
Conference papers on the topic "CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS"
1
Saudakhanov, Marat. "ACADEMIC FREEDOM AS A LEGAL CATEGORY IN THE SYSTEM OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF MAN AND CITIZEN." In Development of legal systems in Russia and foreign countries: problems of theory and practices. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02090-6-0-140-147.
Full textAbstract:
Based on the analysis of scientific literature, the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and foreign states, as well as the norms of international Law, freedom of teaching as a legal category in the system of constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen are analyzed. It is shown, in particular, that the domestic constitutional and legal representation of the category “academic freedom” is mainly located in the plane of subjective Law due to the burden of a wide range of legal restrictions and the absence of absolute properties.
2
Pleps, Jānis. "Konstitūcijas pārākuma princips." In Latvijas Universitātes 81. starptautiskā zinātniskā konference. LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.21.
Full textAbstract:
The principle of supremacy of constitution is a mandatory requirement of the existence of the written constitution in the relevant legal system. This principle allows to ensure the supreme legal force and enforcement of the constitution in the legal and social reality. In the Latvian legal system, the principle of supremacy of constitution is recognized as a general principle of law and consequence of the principle of rule of law. This concept was developed after proclamation of the Republic of Latvia and existed as an unwritten norm without special provision in the text of constitution. The principle of supremacy of constitution recognizes the constitution as a legal act with supreme legal force and requires for all other legal acts to be compatible with the constitution. It is forbidden to apply legal norms which do not comply with the constitution. As a legal act with supreme legal force, the constitution cannot be amended with ordinary legislative acts. The principle of supremacy of constitution requires mechanisms of constitutional review in the legal system.
3
Džomić, Velibor. "VERSKO PITANjE U VIDOVDANSKOM USTAVU." In 100 GODINA OD VIDOVDANSKOG USTAVA. Faculty of law, University of Kragujevac, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/zbvu21.319dz.
Full textAbstract:
In 1918, the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes included various peoples and numerous churches and religious communities. The largest number of inhabitants of the new state belonged to the Orthodox, Roman Catholic and Muslim religions. The founder of the Constitution had the obligation to regulate the right to freedom of religion by the Constitution and to ensure equality between the existing churches and religious communities. The founder of the Constitution decided to reject the earlier constitutional model of the state religion from the Kingdom of Serbia and the Kingdom of Montenegro and to standardize the constitutional model of adopted or recognized religions. The political basis for the new constitutional solution was found in point 7 of the Corfu Declaration, which stated that ”all recognized religions will be exercised freely and publicly. The Orthodox, Roman Catholic and Mohammedan religions, which are the strongest in our nation in terms of the number of followers, will be equal and equal to the state. Based on these principles, the legislator will take care to preserve and maintain confessional peace, which corresponds to the spirit and past of our entire nation”. The paper analyzes the norms of the Vidovdan Constitution on freedom of religion.
4
Кульбакова, А. С. "ORGANIZATIONAL AND LEGAL MECHANISM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS." In Всероссийская студенческая научная конференция с международным участием "Молодежь, наука и цивилизация". Сибирский юридический институт Министерства внутренних дел Российской Федерации, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.51980/2019_227_117.
Full text
5
Jovanović, Zoran, and Stefan Andonović. "UPRAVNO SUDSTVO PREMA VIDOVDANSKOM USTAVU." In 100 GODINA OD VIDOVDANSKOG USTAVA. Faculty of law, University of Kragujevac, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/zbvu21.233j.
Full textAbstract:
The Vidovdan Constitution of the newly formed Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes is one of the most important monuments of regional history of constitutional law. Adopted in 1921, in order to determine the basic principles of state and social organization, the Vidovdan Constitution contained certain provisions that are still acceptable today 100 years later. Moreover, the Vidovdan Constitution represents one of the most important moments in the creation of the administrative judiciary of the states that later emerged in the territory of the Kingdom. Namely, the literature states that the organization of the administrative judiciary, provided by the Constitution, leads to the most significant period in the development of the administrative judiciary (in Serbia) from its founding in 1869 until the Second World War. In this regard, as one of the most important aspects, authors emphasize the introduction of a two-tier administrative judiciary, with significant guarantees of professionalism in the selection of judges. Having in mind its significance in the history of the administrative judiciary, the authors will analyze the basic constitutional norms regarding the legal nature and organization of the administrative judiciary. Also, the research will include the issue of the position of judges of the administrative court and members of the State Council. In addition to the constitutional provisions, paper gives mentions to relevant provisions of the Law on the State Council and Administrative Courts, as well as the Decree on the State Council and Administrative Courts adopted shortly after the Vidovdan Constitution.
6
Strada-Rozenberga, Kristine, and Janis Rozenbergs. "Clarity of a Criminal Law Provision in the Case Law of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia." In The 8th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. University of Latvia Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.8.2.20.
Full textAbstract:
The quality criteria for the provisions of criminal law follow from Art. 90 and the second sentence of Art. 92 of the Satversme [Constitution] of the Republic of Latvia. A person may be recognised as being guilty and punished only for such actions that have been recognised as being criminal in accordance with law. A person’s fundamental right to know his or her rights defines the framework for the legislator’s actions because only such a provision that complies with all the quality criteria of a legal provision may be recognised as being a law, i.e., as having been granted legal force. These fundamental rights require the legislator to take special care in drafting legal norms that envisage criminal liability, which is the most severe form of legal liability. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia has repeatedly engaged in assessing the quality of criminal law provisions. This study provides an insight into the Constitutional Court’s approach to reviewing the clarity of criminal law provisions and summarizes the most important findings made by the Constitutional Court regarding this issue.
7
Neculai, Lungeanu. "THE ROLE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION IN ALL CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS." In 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2017. Stef92 Technology, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/12/s02.099.
Full text
8
Shasivari, Jeton. "THE PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS AND REAL ROLE IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL SYSTEM-DILEMMAS AND CHALLENGES." In 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2017. Stef92 Technology, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/12/s02.095.
Full text
9
Юн, Л. В. "Constitutional legal understanding of law enforcers as one of the modern civilizational challenges." In XXIII Международная научная конференция «Цивилизация знаний: российские реалии» «Цивилизационные задачи современного правоведения: наука, образование, практика» (стратегическая панель). Crossref, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18137/cz22.2022.56.35.001.
Full textAbstract:
Конституционное правопонимание формирующееся у судей Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации в ходе реализации правоприменительного процесса оказывает впоследствии важную роль в ходе охраны и защиты нарушенных конституционных прав и свобод человека и гражданина. Считаем важным отметить, что процесс установления нарушенных прав и свобод происходит в рамках конституционного судопроизводства. Стоит отметить, что конституционное правопонимание как одно из современных цивилизационных вызовов будучи особенной концепцией правопонимания реализуется путем эмпирического исследования правовых норм, детальное изучение которых будет способствовать эффективному разрешению правового конфликта, возникшего между участниками конституционного судопроизводства. The constitutional legal understanding that is formed among the judges of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation during the implementation of the law enforcement process subsequently plays an important role in the protection and protection of violated constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen. We consider it important to note that the process of establishing violated rights and freedoms takes place within the framework of constitutional legal proceedings. It should be noted that constitutional legal understanding as one of the modern civilizational challenges, being a special concept of legal understanding, is realized through an empirical study of legal norms, a detailed study of which will contribute to the effective resolution of the legal conflict that has arisen between the participants in constitutional proceedings.
10
Bulbeniuk, Svitlana, Vira Haponenko, and Yurii Maneliuk. "Evolution of Constitutional Norms in Post-Soviet States: Democratic Procedure or Approval of Quo Status?" In International Conference on Social Science, Psychology and Legal Regulation (SPL 2021). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211218.011.
Full textReports on the topic "CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS"
1
Enfield, Sue. Promoting Gender Equality in the Eastern Neighbourhood Region. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2021.063.
Full textAbstract:
This helpdesk report synthesises evidence on the drivers and opportunities for promoting gender equality in the Eastern Neighbourhood region. Although equality between women and men is enshrined in the constitutions and legal systems of all Eastern Neighbourhood countries, and all countries have ratified most of the important international conventions in this area without reservations; women are still subject to social discrimination. Discriminatory laws, social norms, and practices rooted in patriarchal systems inherited from the Soviet era have negative consequences and act as drags upon gender equality. Former Soviet states making the transition from a command economy to a market-driven system need to make changes in governance and accountability systems to allow for women to have agency and to benefit from any nominal status of gender equality. This report considers areas where there are outstanding opportunities to improve women’s situation in Eastern Neighbourhood countries.
2
Hicks, Jacqueline. Drivers of Compliance with International Human Rights Treaties. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), August 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2021.130.
Full textAbstract:
Are international human rights treaties associated with better rights performance? The appetite for a conclusive answer has driven a number of large scale quantitative studies that have broadly shown little or no effect, and sometimes even a backsliding. However, the headline conclusions belie much more complicated findings, and the research methods used are controversial. These issues undermine confidence in the findings. Comparative and individual case studies allow for more detailed information about how domestic human rights activists use international human rights laws in practice. They tend to be more positive about the effect of treaties, but they are not as systematic as the quantitative work. Some indirect measures of treaty effect show that the norms contained within them filter down into domestic constitutions, and that the process of human rights reporting at the UN may be useful if dialogue can be considered an a priori good. It is likely that states are driven to comply with human rights obligations through a combination of dynamic influences. Drivers of compliance with international law is a major, unresolved question in the research that is heavily influenced by the worldview of researchers. The two strongest findings are: Domestic context drives compliance. In particular: (1) The strength of domestic non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and links with international NGOs (INGOs), and (2) in partial and transitioning democracies where locals have a reason to use the treaties as tools to press their claims. External enforcement may help drive compliance when: (1) other states link human rights obligations in the treaties to preferential trade agreements, and (2) INGOs ‘name and shame’ human rights violations, possibly reducing inward investment flows from companies worried about their reputation. Scholars also identify intermediate effects of continued dialogue and norm socialisation from the UN’s human rights reporting processes. Interviews with diplomats involved in UN reporting say that the process is more effective when NGOs and individual governments are involved.