Academic literature on the topic 'Corporate governance ; Board duties'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Corporate governance ; Board duties.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Corporate governance ; Board duties"
Soana, Maria Gaia, and Giuseppe Crisci. "Duties and responsibilities of the nominating committee." Corporate Ownership and Control 15, no. 1 (2017): 246–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c1p8.
Full textRix, Mark. "The new Australian system of corporate governance: Board governance and company performance in a changing corporate governance environment." Corporate Law and Governance Review 1, no. 2 (2019): 29–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/clgrv1i2p3.
Full textSeng, Dyna, and Justin Findlay. "Corporate governance and earnings management in New Zealand." Corporate Ownership and Control 10, no. 2 (2013): 40–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i2art4.
Full textAtkins, Jill, Mohamed Zakari, and Ismail Elshahoubi. "Implementing the board of directors’ mechanism – An empirical study of the listed firms in Libya." Corporate Board role duties and composition 14, no. 1 (2018): 22–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cbv14i1art2.
Full textProfumo, Giorgia. "Editorial: Advancing research on good corporate governance practices: The role of the board." Corporate Board role duties and composition 16, no. 2 (2020): 4–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cbv16i2editorial.
Full textClarke, Thomas. "Dangerous frontiers in corporate governance." Journal of Management & Organization 20, no. 3 (May 2014): 268–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.37.
Full textBavoso, Vincenzo. "Editorial." Corporate Board role duties and composition 14, no. 2 (2018): 4–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cbv14i2_editorial.
Full textArora, Jaskiran. "Corporate governance: a farce at Volkswagen?" CASE Journal 13, no. 6 (November 13, 2017): 685–703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tcj-09-2016-0078.
Full textKgarabjang, Tshegofatso. "Evaluation of governance challenges associated with the exercise of fiduciary duties by the board members of the state-owned entities." Corporate Law and Governance Review 2, no. 1 (2020): 8–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/clgrv2i1p1.
Full textKurniawanto, Hudi. "The Effect Board Characteristics On Enterprise Risk Management Disclosures: Evidence from State-Owned Enterprise In Indonesia." Archives of Business Research 8, no. 12 (January 15, 2021): 230–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.812.9525.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Corporate governance ; Board duties"
Gkliatis, Ioannis P. "An examination of board director's roles and the impact of the external environment and board characteristics." Thesis, Brunel University, 2014. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11032.
Full textGiani, Anton Louis. "Corporate governance : power, duties, responsibilities and functions of the board : practical guidelines for Agricol Beherend Limited." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/49896.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: Corporate governance has become the latest business "buzz-word" during the last number of years. It is almost being used as an excuse for too many things that go wrong with, or within, companies. However, the word is not going to disappear from business lexicon, it has come to stay. Too many companies and investors have suffered due to the greed of individuals, appointed to lead and manage the business that have misused their position of trust and enriched themselves in many ways. This could have been brought about by many reasons: • Directors who have not been trained properly for their fiduciary duties and other duties and responsibilities. • Directors who have not been evaluated on their performance as a board or individually. • No formal governance structures within the organisation. • No culture of accountability within the organisation. • Simple greed. This study concentrates on some of the literature, ranging from the Cadbury report released in 1992, the OECD principles and international trends, to the South African King II Report, released in 2002. From the literature, and the recommendations from it, there can be no doubt that the pressure to improve governance structures will become fiercer around the globe. Investors are taking it seriously and are willing to pay a premium for shares in a properly governed enterprise. Directors will have to sharpen their skills in being the primary instrument in preventing further corporate scandals. The importance of their accountability towards the company will be measured when board evaluation no longer is an exception, but the rule, in creating effective boards. Agricol Beherend Limited should be no exception. Although not required to formally comply with the recommendations of the King II Code, it can only be advantageous in striving to long-term sustainability. It is further concluded that entrepreneurship is at the heart of capitalistic society, the sphere in which businesses operate in creating wealth for their investors. This is where the influence and leadership abilities of non-executives play a vital role in creating the environment and culture for enterprises to flourish in. They have to determine the equilibrium between conformance and performance in keeping the entrepreneurial spirit alive, yet complying with best practice principles of corporate governance.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Korporatiewe bestuur, of beheer, het oor die laaste aantal jare die nuutste gebruikswoorde in die besigheidsomgewing geword. Dit word feitlik as verskoning gebruik vir alles wat met, of binne-in, organisasies verkeerd loop. Desnieteenstaande, die woorde gaan nie van die algemene besigheidsspreektaal verdwyn nie, dit het gekom om te bly. Te veel maatskappye en beleggers het gely onder die hebsug van individue wat aangestel is om maatskappye te lei en te bestuur, maar wat hulle vertrouensposisie misbruik het om hulself op verskeie maniere te verryk. Dit kon deur 'n verskeidenheid van redes teweeggebring gewees het: • Direkteure wat nie behoorlik opgelei is in hulle fudisiëre pligte, asook ander pligte en verantwoordelikhede nie. • Direkteure wat nie behoorlik geëvalueer is op hulle prestasie as 'n raad of op individuele basis nie. • Geen behoorlike formele korporatiewe bestuursstrukture binne die maatskappy nie. • Geen kultuur van verantwoording binne die maatskappy nie. • Eenvoudige hebsug. Die studie konsentreer op sekere gedeeltes van die literatuur wat strek van die Cadbury verslag wat in1992 vrygestel is, die OECD beginsels en internasionale tendense, tot by die Suid-Afrikaanse King II verslag wat in 2002 verskyn het. Uit die literatuur, en die aanbevelings daarin vervat, kan daar geen twyfel wees dat die druk om korporatiewe beheerstrukture te verbeter in die toekoms, wêreldwyd, slegs groter sal word nie. Beleggers is besig om ernstig daarna op te let en is selfs bereid om 'n premie te betaal vir aandele in 'n organisasie wat behoorlike korporatiewe bestuur toepas. Direkteure sal hulle vaardighede moet opknap, aangesien hulle die primêre instrument is om verdere korporatiewe skandale te voorkom. Die belangrikheid van hulle verantwoording teenoor die maatskappy sal gemeet word wanneer die evaluering van direksies nie meer die uitsondering is nie, maar die reël, in die samestelling van effektiewe direksies. Agricol Beherend Beperk behoort geen uitsondering te wees nie. Alhoewel dit nie verlang word om formeel aan die aanbevelings van die King II Kode te voldoen nie, kan dit slegs tot voordeel wees in die strewe na langtermyn volhoubaarheid. Die verdere gevolgtrekking is dat entrepreneurskap die kern vorm van 'n kapitalistiese bestel, die ruimte waarin besighede opereer om welvaart vir beleggers te skep. Dit is waar die invloed en leierskapsvaardighede van nie-uitvoerende direkteure 'n belangrike rol speel in die skepping van 'n omgewing en kultuur waarbinne besighede kan floreer. Hulle moet die ekwilibrium bepaal tussen voldoening en prestasie, deur 'n gees van entrepreneurskap, terwyl daar voldoen word aan beste korporatiewe bestuursbeginsels.
Junior, Mario Engler Pinto. "O Estado como acionista controlador." Universidade de São Paulo, 2009. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2132/tde-17112011-111844/.
Full textThis dissertation aims at establishing a theoretical framework according to Brazilian law to identify the role of state-owned enterprise in contemporary world. This is the first step to understand what the governments behavior should be as a controlling shareholder and the legal rules applied to its relationship with equity investors and others stakeholders. The approach is based on the assumption that every state-owned enterprise has a public mission implicitly or explicitly included in its bylaws objectives. The public mission varies according to the nature of the business and should be redefined from time to time to keep adherence to the external environment. The public mission coexists with the companys profit scope and guides the States actions, as well as those of directors and officers. For that reason the public mission is embedded in their fiduciary duties.
Djäken, Johan. "Doing Good While Being Good : A study of the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and the Swedish Companies Act." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-306630.
Full textDen här examensuppsatsen utforskar förhållandet mellan några av aktiebolagslagens regler och det engagemang som bolag noterade på Nasdaq Stockholm uppvisar i frågor rörande Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Ämnet kan sägas vara särskilt relevant då såväl det samtida näringslivet som lagstiftaren tycks präglas av en ökad medvetenhet kring CSR-frågor. Den ökade medvetenheten i näringslivet förefaller alltmer inverka på affärsbeslut, ett faktum som inte minst avspeglas i de svenska bolagens topplaceringar i globala index som mäter bolags arbete med hållbarhetsfrågor. Samtidigt speglas lagstiftarens ökade medvetenhet av allt fler svenska som europeiska regulatoriska initiativ på området och vars yttersta syfte är att uppmuntra och stimulera hållbara företag som inte pådyvlar samhället oacceptabla sociala kostnader. Det är således inte särskilt anmärkningsvärt att bolagen, i synnerhet de med intressen anknutna till konsumentmarknaderna, tycks erkänna vikten av att bygga och underhålla långsiktiga relationer med en vidare krets av intressenter än deras aktieägare. Det är min förhoppning att den här uppsatsen kommer att bidra till den ständigt växande del av den aktiebolagsrättsliga diskursen som diskuterar till vilken grad bolag, utan att handla i strid med ABL:s bestämmelser, kan företa åtgärder kopplade till CSR. Eftersom jag inledningsvis anför att bolagen på Nasdaq Stockholm tycks ägna sig allt mer åt CSR diskuterar också uppsatsen om några av ABL:s bestämmelser bör förändras för att bättre hantera dessa företags allt större engagemang i CSR-frågor. Sammanfattningsvis argumenterar jag för att nuvarande företagsekonomisk forskning kring CSR tillsammans med de aktuella bestämmelsernas juridiska innebörd innebär att såväl bolagsstyrelser som verkställande direktörer kan företa i princip vilken investering relaterad till CSR som helst. Aktieägare är i praktiken hänvisade till att söka åstadkomma långsiktigt lönsamma satsningar på hållbarhet genom sanktioner ex post, exempelvis genom att sälja sina aktier eller rösta bort styrelsen. Detta innebär å ena sidan i praktiken, med tanke på att nuvarande företagsekonomisk forskning kring CSR:s inverkan på bolags vinster är tvetydig, att de relevanta bestämmelserna i ABL såsom de nu är utformade utgör en trygg hamn även för många av de transaktioner relaterade till CSR som är direkt värdeförstörande. Å andra sidan argumenterar jag i uppsatsen för att problemet med överinvesteringar i CSR inte nödvändigtvis behöver vara särskilt utbrett då bolagen och deras bolagsstyrning allt mer kommit att präglas av kortsiktiga investeringsperspektiv.
Zhao, Yuan. "Corporate governance and board independence." Thesis, University of Strathclyde, 2010. http://oleg.lib.strath.ac.uk:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=12400.
Full textVan, Heerden Lodewyk. "Corporate governance - appraising board performance." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/50305.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: Picture the scene: It's Monday morning and the main article in Business Day is headlined ·Company X Board is under investigation for not diclosing the truth about its financial wellbeing". In recent times life has been very messy and difficult for many boards, but many of them are in a better position to direct their organisation and to add real shareholder value. A sequence of events triggered board changes in organisations. Many boards have realised over the last few years that the rules for direction-giving have changed. The need for accountability is high, the status quo needs to be challenged and sound strategic thinking is critical in their decision-making. Boards need to establish a performance culture with the correct people, equipped with the necessary competencies and capabilities. Leading shareholders demanded board appraisals to evaluate the continuous underperformance of board structures and processes. Some of the questions asked are, if the board is effective as a group to meet the organisation's purpose and if they can monitor the external and internal environment effectively. It is also asked whether the skills and competencies of individual members are sufficient to enable them to fulfill their risk assessment and decision-making director roles sufficiently. Board members must understand their roles to evaluate their personal development and board needs. Boards must ensure a process for appropriate development plans for their individual directorial duties. They need to define which essential strategic decisions are made during the various administrative and information sharing meetings. The annual cycles of boards are important, as is the need to check that all accountabilities are on track. This feedback does not merely concern financial matters. It is important to evaluate strategic decisions to ensure that they are carefully measured against the targets set at the beginning of the year. Many boards have adopted a triple bottom line approach, measuring their financial performance, physical environment and social responsibility reports against agreed targets. These targets need to be incorporated in a board scorecard which will graphically depict the board's value-adding activities. These scorecards will give any board an indication of its effectiveness. Boards have accepted evaluation processes and have gone through a steep learning curve in developing and implementing them. There are numerous approaches to evaluate board performance. Each board must decide whether it is better to do a peer level evaluation, outside evaluation or follow the bottom-up approach. Formal board evaluations have given boards more credibility and have helped to identify gaps in the development of board members. Boards must be developed to become more competent at direction-giving, ultimately in order to contribute to the effectiveness of the organisation. Boards must continue to drive the organisation ahead, while keeping it under control. Board members must realise that their ultimate tests are business effectiveness, in that they must add shareholder value to the balance sheet, and business efficiency, referring to the improvement realised on the profit and loss accounts.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Stel jouself voor : Dit is Maandagoggend en die hoofartikel in Business Day is as volg: "Daar is 'n ondersoek gelas na Maatskappy X se kredietwaardigheid rakende hulle finansiele welstand." Direksies oor die laaste paar jare was in 'n warboel. Ons vind tans dat organisasies beter gelei word en dat welvaart geskep word vir alle aandeelhouers. Heelwat faktore het aanleiding gegee dat direksies verander het. Die reels om leiding te gee het verander: direksies moet meer aanspreeklikheid neem, die status quo word meer bevraagteken en goeddeurdagte strategiese denke is almal bydraende faktore. Direksies moet streef om 'n prestasie-kuItuur te vestig met lede wat oor die nodige vaardighede en vermoens beskik. Aandeelhouers dring aan dat direksies se prestasie beoordeel moet word. Tipiese vrae wat gevra word is: is die direksie effektief as 'n groep om die organisasie se primere doel na te streef en kan hulle die interne en eksterne faktore effektief monitor? Individuele direksielede moet oor die nodige bevoegdhede beskik om voldoende risk-analise en direksie-besluitnemings uit te voer. Direksielede moet hulle onderskeie ontwikkelingsrolle verstaan. Dit moet duidelik gedefinieer word watter kritiese strategiese besluite word by watter vergaderings geneem. Jaarlikse siklusse vir direksies is belangrik, dit stel hulle in staat om te evalueer of al die strategiese besluite wat geneem is, uitgevoer is teenoor die ooreengekome doelwitte. Direksies evalueer meestal hulle finansiele prestasie, fisiese omgewing en sosiale verantwoordelikheid teenoor ooreengekome doelwitte. Hierdie doelwitte word meestal ingesluit in die organisasie se telkaart. Die doel van die telkaart is om vir direksies 'n aanduiding te gee of hulle effektief is of nie. Baie direksies het een of ander vorm van evaluasie geimplimenteer. Daar is verskeie benaderings om direksie-prestasie te evalueer. Elke direksie moet self besluit watter benadering is die mees geskikte - eksterne evaluering of "peer to peer" evaluering. Formele evaluering gee meer kredietwaardigheid aan die proses en help ook met die identifisering van ontwikkelingsmoontlikhede. Direksies moet fokus op ontwikkeling sodat hulle meer bevoeg kan raak om beter leiding te gee in die organisasie. Direksies moet onthou dat die bepalende toets is besigheideffektiwiteit, waar aandeelhouer-waardetoevoeging gemeet word en of daar verbeterde besigheidsdoeltreffendheid op die wins en verliesrekening is.
Gibbs, David. "Non-executive directors' self-interest : fiduciary duties and corporate governance." Thesis, University of East Anglia, 2014. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/49712/.
Full textŽilková, Alena. "Corporate Governance." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2009. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-11230.
Full textAlawi, Suha Mahmoud. "Corporate governance and cartel formation." Thesis, University of Bath, 2013. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.665372.
Full textWang, Yuwei. "Two Essays on Corporate Governance." Scholar Commons, 2012. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4415.
Full textBooks on the topic "Corporate governance ; Board duties"
Neville, Mette, Karsten Engsig Sørensen, and Hanne Søndergaard Birkmose. Boards of directors in European companies: Reshaping and harmonising their organisation and duties. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2013.
Find full textSulaiman, Aiman Nariman Mohd. Directors' duties and corporate governance. Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia: Sweet & Maxwell Asia, 2001.
Find full textHilb, Martin. New Corporate Governance: Successful Board Management Tools. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
Find full textNew corporate governance: Successful board management tools. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005.
Find full textLindgren, Ulf. All above board: Creating the ideal corporate board. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Find full textTukur, Garba, and Mikailu Aminu S, eds. Board independence and firm financial performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Nairobi: African Economic Research Consortium, 2011.
Find full textL, Bromilow Catherine, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and Institute of Internal Auditors. Research Foundation., eds. Corporate governance and the board-- what works best. Altamonte Springs, Fla: Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, 2000.
Find full textScotland, Commission for Local Authorities Accounts in. All above board: Corporate governance in the NHS. Edinburgh: Accounts Commission for Scotland, 1996.
Find full textBoard of directors corporate governance: Lapdog or watchdog? Leesburg, VA: Wycliff Pub., Inc., 2007.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Corporate governance ; Board duties"
Ferreira, Daniel. "Board Diversity." In Corporate Governance, 225–42. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118258439.ch12.
Full textWelge, Martin K., and Marc Eulerich. "Board Dynamics." In Corporate-Governance-Management, 87–112. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08239-0_4.
Full textRaval, Vasant. "The Board in Action." In Corporate Governance, 141–56. Boca, Raton : CRC Press, 2020. |: Auerbach Publications, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003031796-10.
Full textRaval, Vasant. "Management and the Board." In Corporate Governance, 157–78. Boca, Raton : CRC Press, 2020. |: Auerbach Publications, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003031796-11.
Full textRaval, Vasant. "The Board of Directors." In Corporate Governance, 73–92. Boca, Raton : CRC Press, 2020. |: Auerbach Publications, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003031796-6.
Full textPadgett, Carol. "The Board of Directors." In Corporate Governance, 45–69. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35711-2_3.
Full textTonello, Matteo. "Board Composition and Organization Issues." In Corporate Governance, 193–223. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118258439.ch11.
Full textRezaee, Zabihollah. "Board Subcommittees for Corporate Governance." In Corporate Governance, 243–62. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118258439.ch13.
Full textHilb, Martin. "Situative Board Dimension." In Integrierte Corporate Governance, 15–73. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15521-5_2.
Full textHilb, Martin. "Strategische Board Dimension." In Integrierte Corporate Governance, 75–108. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15521-5_3.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Corporate governance ; Board duties"
Pichet, Eric. "Duties of independent directors in listed companies in 2019." In New Challenges in Corporate Governance: Theory and Practice. Virtus Interpress, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/ncpr_28.
Full textCorreia, Anacleto, and Pedro B. Água. "A corporate governance perspective on IT governance." In Corporate governance: A search for emerging trends in the pandemic times. Virtus Interpress, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cgsetpt19.
Full textNadarajan, Santhirasegaran. "Corporate Governance: Board Size, Managerial Ownership and Operations Performance." In ISSC 2016 International Conference on Soft Science. Cognitive-crcs, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.08.27.
Full textKhairani, Nadia, and Devianti Yunita Harahap. "Corporate Governance and Firms Value: From the Board Diversity and Board Compensation Perspective." In 2nd International Conference on Economic Education and Entrepreneurship. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0006888104700478.
Full textGrau Grau, Alfredo Juan, and Inmaculada Bel Oms. "Big Data in Corporate Governance decision." In CARMA 2020 - 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research Methods and Analytics. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/carma2020.2020.11600.
Full textVacca, Andrea, Antonio Iazzi, and Monica Fait. "Corporate governance and firm efficiency: The role of board composition." In New Challenges in Corporate Governance: Theory and Practice. Virtus Interpress, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/ncpr_46.
Full textJiang Tao and Wang Huai-ming. "Board governance, ultimate controller and corporate social responsibility disclosures paper." In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/gsis.2015.7301923.
Full textAlqatan, Ahmad. "The association between board diversity, earnings management and firm performance in Kuwait: A research agenda." In Corporate Governance: Search for the Advanced Practices. Virtus Interpress, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cpr19p14.
Full textLepore, Luigi, Sabrina Pisano, Gabriella D’Amore, and Carmela Di Guida. "Board independence and voluntary financial disclosure: The moderating role of ownership structure." In New challenges in corporate governance: Theory and practice. Virtus Interpress, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/ncpr_42.
Full textRicci, Federica, Vincenzo Scafarto, Flaviano Moscarini, and Gaetano Della Corte. "The concept of board capital in corporate governance research: A structured literature review." In New Challenges in Corporate Governance: Theory and Practice. Virtus Interpress, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/ncpr_44.
Full textReports on the topic "Corporate governance ; Board duties"
Sadowski, Dieter. Board-Level Codetermination in Germany - The Importance and Economic Impact of Fiduciary Duties. Association Inter-University Centre Dubrovnik, May 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.53099/ntkd4304.
Full text