Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Cotton – Insect control and insecticides

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters
Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Cotton – Insect control and insecticides'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 9 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Cotton – Insect control and insecticides.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Cotton – Insect control and insecticides"

1

Matthews, G. A. "Cotton Insect Pest Control." Outlook on Agriculture 18, no. 4 (December 1989): 169–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003072708901800406.

Full text

Abstract:

Despite competition from other natural and man-made fibres cotton remains the world's most important textile, of great economic importance in many of the countries in which it is grown. It is prone to a number of pests which reduce yield and the control of these presents many problems. While integrated pest management can solve many of these, some use of insecticides cannot be avoided.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Baker, M. A., A. H. Makhdum, M. Nasir, A. Imran, A. Ahmad, and F. Tufail. "COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SYNTHETIC AND BOTANICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUCKING INSECT PEST AND THEIR NATURAL ENEMIES ON COTTON CROP." Journal of Mountain Area Research 1 (August 27, 2016): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.53874/jmar.v1i0.6.

Full text

Abstract:

The Synthetic and botanical insecticides are relatively safer for environment and beneficial insects. The study was conducted in Rahim Yar Khan during the cotton cropping season 2014 to evaluate the comparative efficacy of two Synthetic insecticides i.e. Nitenpyram (Jasper 10% SL) and Pyriproxyfen (Bruce 10.8% EC) and two botanical extracts of Calotropic procera and Azadirachta indica, against sucking insect pest complex of cotton and their natural enemies. Upon reaching economic thresholds, the recommended field doses of all the insecticides were applied on cotton cultivar MNH-886. Data against sucking pests and their natural enemies was recorded 24 hours prior to insecticidal application and then 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after insecticidal application. Results revealed that Nitenpyram was much toxic against sucking pests followed by Pyriproxyfen as compared to two botanical extracts. On the other hand, the synthetic insecticides did not prove safer for natural enemies as compared to botanical extracts. It was concluded that as an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy, botanical extracts can be used at low infestation levels so that ecosystem service of biological control may be sustained.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Mink, J. S., and R. G. Luttrell. "MORTALITY OF FALL ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) EGGS, LARVAE AND ADULTS EXPOSED TO SEVERAL INSECTICIDES ON COTTON." Journal of Entomological Science 24, no. 4 (October 1, 1989): 563–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.18474/0749-8004-24.4.563.

Full text

Abstract:

Mortality of eggs, first, third, and fifth instars and adults of fall army worm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), after exposure to several insecticides on cotton indicated that the FAW is susceptible to most insecticides currently used to control Heliothis spp. Most insecticides tested exhibited ovicidal activity. High mortality of first instar larvae was observed for most treatments, including the biological insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner). More variation in mortality among treatments was observed in third and fifth instars than in first instars. Pyrethroid, carbamate, and organophosphorous insecticides resulted in higher mortality than did B. thuringiensis. Diflubenzuron, an insect growth regulator, was as effective as commonly used insecticides against third and fifth instar larvae when mortality was observed at pupation. Third instar FAW placed on plant tissue from the upper section of cotton plants sprayed in field situations suffered higher mortality than those placed on plant tissue from lower sections in the plant canopy. Inadequate deposition of insecticide in the lower portions of the cotton plant appears to be a limiting factor in control of FAW larvae on cotton.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Nurindah, Nurindah, and Dwi Adi Sunarto. "Developing Cotton IPM by Conserving Parasitoids and Predators of The Main Pest." Jurnal Entomologi Indonesia 8, no. 2 (September 27, 2015): 110–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5994/jei.8.2.110-120.

Full text

Abstract:

On early development of intensive cotton program, insect pests were considered as an important aspect in cotton cultivation, so that it needed to be scheduled sprays. The frequency of sprays was 7 times used 12L of chemical insecticides per hectare per season. Development of cotton IPM was emphasized on non-chemical control methods through optimally utilize natural enemies of the cotton main pests (Amrasca biguttulla (Ishida)Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)). Conservation of parasitoids and predators by providing the environment that support their population development is an act of supporting the natural enemies as an effective biotic mortality factor of the insect pests. The conservation could be done by improving the plant matter and cultivation techniques that include the use of resistant variety to leafhopper, intercropping cotton with secondary food plants, mulch utilization, using action threshold that considered the presence of natural enemies, and application of botanical insecticides, if needed. Conservation of parasitoids and predators in cotton IPM could control the insect pests without any insecticide spray in obtaining the production of cotton seed. As such, the use of IPM method would increase farmers’ income.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Chamberlain, D. J., Z. Ahmad, M. R. Attique, and M. A. Chaudhry. "The influence of slow release PVC resin pheromone formulations on the mating behaviour and control of the cotton bollworm complex (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae and Noctuidae) in Pakistan." Bulletin of Entomological Research 83, no. 3 (September 1993): 335–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007485300029229.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractComparisons of infestation and damage levels by the cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Earias vittella (Fabricius) and E. insulana (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were made in cotton fields treated with pheromones + insecticide, insecticides only, and untreated control plots, in Pakistan during the 1991 cotton season. Early to mid season control of these three pests by mating disruption in the pheromone + insecticide treated plots meant that an average reduction of 3.5 applications of insecticides was achieved when compared with the insecticide only treated plots to control the cotton pest complex. Night observations showed that there were far fewer adult moths visible in the pheromone + insecticide treated plots than in insecticide only treated plots. Adults of both sexes were much less active and did not mate as frequently as adults in the insecticide only plots.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Grundy, P. R. "Utilizing the assassin bug, Pristhesancus plagipennis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), as a biological control agent within an integrated pest management programme for Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Creontiades spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) in cotton." Bulletin of Entomological Research 97, no. 3 (May 24, 2007): 281–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007485307004993.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractHelicoverpa spp. and mirids, Creontiades spp., have been difficult to control biologically in cotton due to their unpredictable temporal abundance combined with a cropping environment often made hostile by frequent usage of broad spectrum insecticides. To address this problem, a range of new generation insecticides registered for use in cotton were tested for compatibility with the assassin bug, Pristhesancus plagipennis (Walker), a potential biological control agent for Helicoverpa spp. and Creontiades spp. Indoxacarb, pyriproxifen, buprofezin, spinosad and fipronil were found to be of low to moderate toxicity on P. plagipennis whilst emamectin benzoate, abamectin, diafenthiuron, imidacloprid and omethaote were moderate to highly toxic. Inundative releases of P. plagipennis integrated with insecticides identified as being of low toxicity were then tested and compared with treatments of P. plagipennis and the compatible insecticides used alone, conventionally sprayed usage practice and an untreated control during two field experiments in cotton. The biological control provided by P. plagipennis nymphs when combined with compatible insecticides provided significant (P<0.001) reductions in Helicoverpa and Creontiades spp. on cotton and provided equivalent yields to conventionally sprayed cotton with half of the synthetic insecticide input. Despite this, the utilization of P. plagipennis in cotton as part of an integrated pest management programme remains unlikely due to high inundative release costs relative to other control technologies such as insecticides and transgenic (Bt) cotton varieties.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Pankey, Joseph H., James L. Griffin, B. Rogers Leonard, Donnie K. Miller, Robert G. Downer, and Richard W. Costello. "Glyphosate–Insecticide Combination Effects on Weed and Insect Control in Cotton." Weed Technology 18, no. 3 (September 2004): 698–703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/wt-03-153.

Full text

Abstract:

Field studies were conducted to evaluate weed control with combinations of glyphosate at 750 g ae/ha and the insecticides acephate (370 g ai/ha), dicrotophos (370 g ai/ha), dimethoate (220 g ai/ha), fipronil (56 g ai/ha), imidacloprid (53 g ai/ha), lambda-cyhalothrin (37 g ai/ha), oxamyl (280 g ai/ha), or endosulfan (420 g ai/ha) and insect control with coapplication of the herbicide with insecticides acephate, dicrotophos, dimethoate, and imidacloprid. Applying lambda-cyhalothrin or fipronil with glyphosate reduced control of hemp sesbania by 19 and 9 percentage points, respectively, compared with glyphosate alone. Acephate, dicrotophos, dimethoate, imidacloprid, lambda-cyhalothrin, oxamyl, and endosulfan did not affect hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, and redweed control by glyphosate. Lambda-cyhalothrin and fipronil did not affect glyphosate control of weeds other than hemp sesbania. Addition of glyphosate to dicrotophos improved cotton aphid control 4 d after treatment compared with dicrotophos alone. Thrips control was improved with addition of glyphosate to imidacloprid. Insect control was not reduced by glyphosate regardless of insecticide.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Critchley, B. R., D. J. Chamberlain, D. G. Campion, M. R. Attique, M. Ali, and A. Ghaffar. "Integrated use of pink bollworm pheromone formulations and selected conventional insecticides for the control of the cotton pest complex in Pakistan." Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, no. 4 (December 1991): 371–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007485300031928.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractHollow-fibre, microencapsulated and twist-tie formulations of the pheromone of the pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) were used in trials conducted in Pakistan from 1985–1988. Early season control of this pest by mating disruption, permitted an average reduction of two applications, of conventional insecticides otherwise required to control the cotton pest complex, particularly at the time of flower and fruit setting when beneficial insects are most numerous. The pheromone formulations, together with a mixture of selective and broad-spectrum insecticides in plots of 5 or 10 ha of cotton were compared with plots of cotton, of similar size in the same locality treated with a conventional insecticide spray programme and in plots where no insecticide applications were made for the control of bollworms. Comparisons of numbers of infested bolls and estimated yields showed that levels of control achieved using the pheromone/insecticide combinations were equal in effect to conventional programmes of insecticide sprays, whereas in plots where no bollworm control measures were taken, significantly higher bollworm infestations and reduced yield estimates were recorded.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Li, Fen, Herbert Venthur, Shang Wang, Rafael A. Homem, and Jing-Jiang Zhou. "Evidence for the Involvement of the Chemosensory Protein AgosCSP5 in Resistance to Insecticides in the Cotton Aphid, Aphis gossypii." Insects 12, no. 4 (April 9, 2021): 335. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects12040335.

Full text

Abstract:

It has been speculated that insect chemosensory proteins (CSPs) may have additional roles beyond olfaction. In this study, the phylogenetic and genomic analyses of the CSPs of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii, revealed the presence of gene gain-and-loss among different aphid field populations. Differential expressions of eight CSP genes were demonstrated after treatments with insecticides of different modes of action. The expression of AgosCSP5 was significantly upregulated by the insecticide treatments in a dose-dependent manner. The Drosophila flies overexpressing AgosCSP5 were significantly less susceptible to the insecticides, omethoate, imidacloprid and cypermethrin but not to deltamethrin and tau-fluvalinate, compared with control flies. The transgenic Drosophila flies exhibited an LC50 resistance ratio of 2.6 to omethoate, compared with control flies. Likewise, the mortality of the transgenic flies to imidacloprid and cypermethrin was significantly lower than that of the control flies (p < 0.01). Homology modelling, molecular docking and dynamic simulation supported the interactions and revealed a higher stability of AgosCSP5/insecticide complexes than AgosCSP5/semiochemical complexes. Our study demonstrates for first time the in vivo evidence for the involvement of CSP genes in insecticide resistance of crop insect pests and provides new insights of the newly discovered CSP-mediated insect resistance mechanism to insecticides.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Sunarto, Dwi Adi, and Nurindah Nurindah. "Peran insektisida botani ekstrak biji mimba untuk konservasi musuh alami dalam pengelolaan serangga hama kapas." Jurnal Entomologi Indonesia 6, no. 1 (December 15, 2016): 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.5994/jei.6.1.42.

Full text

Abstract:

Natural Enemies Conservation: The Role of Neem-seed Extracts for Natural Enemies Conservation Used of Cotton Insect Pest Control. Insects associated with cotton plant are numerous, as the plant bears extrafloral nectar. More than 90 species of natural enemies are reported and identified. They could manage the cotton pest, keeping the pest population is under action threshold level when their presence is considered in scouting and action threshold concept. However, most of cotton farmers are insecticide-spray-minded people who think that insecticide sprays is a must in cotton cultivation. This behavior is unfavorable for the natural enemies in building their population so they can act as an effective mortality factor for the pest. Neem seed extract (NSE) is toxic to herbivores but relatively safe for natural enemies, so that it could be used as a substitute for synthetic chemical insecticides. Therefore, NSE is recommended to be used for conserving natural enemies in cotton agro ecosystem.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Cotton – Insect control and insecticides"

1

Watson, T. F., and Clay Mullis. "Effect of Various Insecticides on Pink Bollworm Control." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204083.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kerns, David L., and Tony Tellez. "Efficacy of Experimental Insecticides for Whitefly Control in Cotton, 1996." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/210365.

Full text

Abstract:

Experimental insecticides were evaluated for control of sweet potato whiteflies relative to a commercial standard in cotton. Ni-25 provided excellent whitefly control and was equivalent to the commercial standard (Knack followed by Danitol + Orthene). Fenoxycarb + pymetrozine provided goodwhitefly control but seemed to require 2 sequential applications before control was equivalent to Ni-25. Diofenolan + pymetrozine appeared to be a slightly weaker treatment, but still provided acceptable whitefly control.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Baker, Paul B., and Tasha M. Brew. "Pest Control Advisors' Recommendations for Cotton Insecticides: A Historical Review." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204514.

Full text

Abstract:

A survey of agricultural pest control professionals showed that certain compounds have consistently been recommended to control cotton pests for more than 40 years. Over that same period, the number of preferred materials available for recommendation has greatly increased. Other trends are toward greater use of compounds using lower application rates and biological insecticides.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Kerns, David L., and Tony Tellez. "Efficacy of Experimental Insecticides for Whitefly Control in Cotton, 1997." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/210376.

Full text

Abstract:

Whitefly populations in this trial were abnormally low relative to previous years experiences. M-25 provided excellent whitefly control and was equivalent to the commercial standard (Knack followed by Danitol + Orthene). However, there is some question concerning its adult activity late in the season, when it appeared to be weaker than Danitol + Orthene and Capture + Curacron. At low whitefly populations Thiodan tank -mixed with Knack appeared to extend control over Knack alone.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Chu, C. C., T. J. Henneberry, and D. H. Akey. "Sweetpotato Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Gennadius) Control: Field Studies with Insecticides on Cotton in the Imperial Valley, CA." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1993. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/209567.

Full text

Abstract:

Insecticides and insecticide mixtures were evaluated for sweetpotato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Gennadius) control on cotton in the Imperial Valley, CA in 1992. Seasonal average number of large immatures was 1.6/cm² leaf disk from plots treated with a mixture of Danitol and Orthene as compared to 4. 5/cm² on leaf disks from untreated control plots. Lint yield was 1232 lbs/ac compared to other treatments which ranged from 551 to 976 lbs /ac.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Kerns, David L., and Tony Tellez. "Efficacy of Experimental Insecticides for Insect Control in Cotton Grown in the Low Desert Region of Arizona, 1997." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/210389.

Full text

Abstract:

Experimental insecticides were evaluated for control of lygus bugs relative to commercial standards in cotton. These products were also evaluated for activity towards whiteflies and pink bollworms. CGA293343 was not effective when used as a side-dress material at layby, but was effective toward whiteflies, and towards lygus at higher foliar rates. Regent, Vydate and Mustang + Thiodan were highly effective for lygus control, while EXP61096A and Mustang alone performed poorly. Against whiteflies, CGA293343, Acetamiprid, and Mustang + Thiodan were most efficacious, while Mustang alone and with Thiodan were most effective towards pink bollworms.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Subramaniam, V. R. "Cloning, characterisation and sequence comparison of sodium channel genes from Pyrethroid-resistant and susceptible strains of Heliothis virescens (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)." Thesis, University of Reading, 1997. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.360077.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Kerns, David L., and Tony Tellez. "Efficacy of Insecticides for Pink Bollworm and Cotton Leaf Perforator Control in Cotton Grown in the Low Desert Region of Arizona, 1997." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/210359.

Full text

Abstract:

Neither Tracer nor Proclaim appeared to be effective pink bollworm materials whether applied at day or night. However against cotton leafperforator, both Tracer and Proclaim provided sufficient control. Although all three formulations of Karate equally provided statistically significant pink bollworm control, it was not commercially acceptable. Shortening the spray interval from 7 to 4 days may have helped alleviate this problem. None of the Karate formulations evaluated appeared to offer outstanding cotton leafperforator control.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Umeda, K., D. MacNeil, and D. Roberts. "New Insecticides for Diamondback Moth Control in Cabbage." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219999.

Full text

Abstract:

At 3 days after the first application, RH-2485, Success, Proclaim, Avaunt, and Larvin reduced the total number of diamondback moth (DBM) larvae to less than 2.0 larvae per 10 plants compared to the untreated that had 7.0 larvae/10 plants. Alert, Kryocide, and S-1812 treated cabbage exhibited 4.0 to 5.0 larvae/10 plants and Lannate was intermediate with 2.7 total larvae/10 plants. Following a second application, Success and Proclaim completely controlled DBM for one week. Success, Proclaim, Alert, and Larvin continued to offer very good control of DBM for two weeks after the second application. S-1812 performed similarly to Lannate.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Umeda, K., D. MacNeil, D. Roberts, and N. Lund. "Evaluation of Foliar Insecticides for Whitefly Control in Cantaloupes." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219996.

Full text

Abstract:

The pyrethroid insecticides esfenvalerate (Asana®), bifenthrin (Capture®), or fenpropathrin (Danitol®) combined with endosulfan effectively reduced whitefly (WF, Bemisia argentifolii) counts at 1 week after treatment (WAT) following each of five applications. Asana, Capture, or Danitol combined with endosulfan effectively reduced WF counts at 1 WAT following each of five applications. Danitol treated melons exhibited fewer adult WF compared to Asana or Capture at most of the rating dates at 6 days after treatment (DAT) of each of the applications and also at 11 DAT of the last application. A single application of buprofezin (Applaud®) treatments or pymetrozine (Fulfill®) effectively reduced WF nymphs for 18 to 24 DAT and adults were reduced for 18 DAT. Fulfill exhibited a rate response where the higher rate reduced WF counts more than the lower rate.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Books on the topic "Cotton – Insect control and insecticides"

1

International Symposium on Advances in the Chemistry of Insect Control (3rd 1993 Queen's College, Cambridge). Advances in the Chemistry of Insect Control III. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1994.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Sahayaraj, K., J. Francis Borgio, and I. Alper Susurluk. Microbial insecticides: Principles and applications. Hauppauge, N.Y: Nova Science Publishers, 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Picimbon, Jean-François, ed. Olfactory Concepts of Insect Control - Alternative to insecticides. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05060-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Picimbon, Jean-François, ed. Olfactory Concepts of Insect Control - Alternative to insecticides. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05165-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Insect control: Biological and synthetic agents. Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier, 2010.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Matthews, G. A. Cotton insect pests and their management. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Scientific & Technical, 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

López, Oscar, and José Fernández-Bolanos. Green trends in insect control. Edited by Kraus George and Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Symposium on the Role of Plant-derived Substances for Insect Control (1989 St. John's, N.L.). Symposium on the Role of Plant-Derived Substances for Insect Control. Ottawa: Entomological Society of Canada, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Byther, Ralph S. Insect and disease control for home gardens: Small fruits, berries. Pullman: Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture & Home Economics, Washington State University, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Maloy, Otis C. Disease and insect spray schedule for home orchards: Apples, pears, eastern Washington. Pullman, [Wash.]: Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture and Home Economics, Washington State University, 1985.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Cotton – Insect control and insecticides"

1

Kranthi, Sandhya, Keshava R. Kranthi, Chetali Rodge, Shilpa Chawla, and Sarita Nehare. "Insect Resistance to Insecticides and Bt Cotton in India." In Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection, 185–99. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99768-1_11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Bonning, Bryony C., Anthony J. Boughton, Hailing Jin, and Robert L. Harrison. "Genetic Enhancement of Baculovirus Insecticides." In Advances in Microbial Control of Insect Pests, 109–25. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4437-8_6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Nauen, Ralf, and Denise Steinbach. "Resistance to Diamide Insecticides in Lepidopteran Pests." In Advances in Insect Control and Resistance Management, 219–40. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31800-4_12.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Yadav, D. N. "Egg Parasitoids in Cotton Ecosystem." In Biological Control of Insect Pests Using Egg Parasitoids, 301–15. New Delhi: Springer India, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1181-5_13.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Breer, Heinz, Jörg Fleischer, Pablo Pregitzer, and Jürgen Krieger. "Molecular Mechanism of Insect Olfaction: Olfactory Receptors." In Olfactory Concepts of Insect Control - Alternative to insecticides, 93–114. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05165-5_4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Einhorn, Evelyne, and Jean-Luc Imler. "Insect Immunity: From Systemic to Chemosensory Organs Protection." In Olfactory Concepts of Insect Control - Alternative to insecticides, 205–29. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05165-5_9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Shiga, Sakiko. "Circadian and Seasonal Timing of Insect Olfactory Systems." In Olfactory Concepts of Insect Control - Alternative to insecticides, 135–49. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05060-3_7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Rooney, Alejandro P., Mark A. Jackson, Christopher A. Dunlap, Robert W. Behle, and Ephantus J. Muturi. "Discovery and Development of Microbial Biological Control Agents." In Olfactory Concepts of Insect Control - Alternative to insecticides, 79–92. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05060-3_4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Kaissling, Karl-Ernst. "Responses of Insect Olfactory Neurons to Single Pheromone Molecules." In Olfactory Concepts of Insect Control - Alternative to insecticides, 1–27. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05165-5_1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Picimbon, Jean-François. "Evolution of Protein Physical Structures in Insect Chemosensory Systems." In Olfactory Concepts of Insect Control - Alternative to insecticides, 231–63. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05165-5_10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Cotton – Insect control and insecticides"

1

Davlianidze, T. A., and O. Yu Eremina. "CHLORPHENAPYR AND INDOXACARB - NEW INSECTICIDES IN THE CONTROL OF FLIES." In V International Scientific Conference CONCEPTUAL AND APPLIED ASPECTS OF INVERTEBRATE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION. Tomsk State University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/978-5-94621-931-0-2020-68.

Full text

Abstract:

At the moment, the actual problem is the search for new insecticides. The use of the same insecticides over the years has led to the emergence of resistant insect populations. Every year the number of resistant populations increases. However, the most dangerous and economically significant species are usually resistant to a large number of pesticides over a large area. There is a need to introduce new groups of chemical compounds into IPM. Indoxacarb and chlorfenapyr-based products are highly effective broad-spectrum drugs. Both insecticides have a strong effect on insects in the form of bait.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Silivanova, E. A., P. A. Shumilova, and M. A. Levchenko. "INFLUENCE OF INSECTICIDE BREEDING ON BIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF MUSCA DOMESTICA L. (DIPTERA: MUSCIDAE)." In V International Scientific Conference CONCEPTUAL AND APPLIED ASPECTS OF INVERTEBRATE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION. Tomsk State University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/978-5-94621-931-0-2020-80.

Full text

Abstract:

The goal of the current research was to evaluate the biological parameters of insects when they were exposed to insecticides for several generations. In the experiments, the adults of the house fly Musca domestica L. were feed with one of two insecticides (chlorfenapyr or fipronil) in each generation. The duration of development stages, fecundity, the weight of larvae, pupa, and adults, as well as the sizes of females and males, were evaluated. The statistical significance of differences in biological parameters was assessed by the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn criteria. The duration of the larva stages lasted 2.2 times more in the fourth generation of chlorfenapyr- and fipronil-exposure strains compared to the control laboratory strain of M. domestica. Increasing the period of preimaginal stages of the insect life cycle can be considered as a sublethal effect of insecticides.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Malgwi, Anna Mohammed. "Bioecology, pest management, and control of insect pests of cotton, cowpea, groundnut, and cereal crops using IPM and botanicals for sustainable agriculture." In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.93326.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!