Academic literature on the topic 'Cotton – Plant growth regulators'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Cotton – Plant growth regulators.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Cotton – Plant growth regulators"

1

GONIAS, E. D., D. M. OOSTERHUIS, and A. C. BIBI. "Cotton radiation use efficiency response to plant growth regulators." Journal of Agricultural Science 150, no. 5 (October 2012): 595–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021859611000803.

Full text
Abstract:
SUMMARYPlant growth regulators are widely used in cotton production to improve crop management. Previous research has demonstrated changes in crop growth, dry matter (DM) partitioning and lint yield of cotton after the application of plant growth regulators. However, no reports are available demonstrating the effect of plant growth regulators on light interception and radiation use efficiency (RUE). Field studies were conducted in Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA in 2006 and 2007. RUE was estimated for the period between the pinhead square stage (PHS) of growth and 3 weeks after first flower (FF+3) from plots receiving three applications of the nitrophenolate and mepiquat chloride with Bacillus cereus plant growth regulators (Chaperone™) at 7·19 g a.i./ha and Pix Plus® at 41·94 g a.i./ha compared with an untreated control. No differences between the Chaperone treatment and the untreated control were found in the present study. However, Pix Plus significantly reduced plant height (both 2006 and 2007) and leaf area (2007 only), and altered the canopy structure of the crop as recorded by increased values of canopy extinction coefficient. Although DM accumulation was found not to be affected by plant growth regulator treatments, RUE was significantly increased after Pix Plus application, by 33·2%. RUE was increased because less light was intercepted by the Pix Plus treatment for the same biomass production, and this is probably a result of changes in photosynthetic capacity of the leaves and changes in light distribution throughout the canopy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Garcia, Rodrigo Arroyo, Mariana Zampar Toledo, and Ciro Antonio Rosolem. "Growth regulator losses from cotton plants due to rainfall." Scientia Agricola 67, no. 2 (April 2010): 158–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90162010000200005.

Full text
Abstract:
Plant growth regulators (PGRs) applied to cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.) can be washed off by rainfall. It is expected that the closer the rainfall to spraying time, the higher the product loss and the higher the amount of product to be reapplied to reach the desired growth rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of time between rainfall and application of either mepiquat chloride or chlormequat chloride to cotton on plant growth, as well as, estimate the need for PGR reapplication. Cotton was grown in 12-L pots with soil in a greenhouse. PGRs were applied forty days after seedling emergence, when 50% of plants had one pinhead square. Rainfall was simulated 1, 2, 4, 6, or 24 h after spraying. Plant height was measured just before PGR application and then at 3-d intervals for 30 d. At harvest, the number of reproductive branches and structures were counted before dry matter phytomass determination. Both growth regulators reduced cotton dry matter yields regardless of rainfall interval. PGRs controlled excessive plant growth; however, their efficiency was reduced as the time elapsed until rainfall was shorter. Product losses were detected after all rainfall intervals, which, in field conditions would require PGR reapplication. Mepiquat chloride rates to be reapplied after rain were on average 17% higher than chlormequat chloride rates.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Thomas, Walter E., Wesley J. Everman, James R. Collins, Clifford H. Koger, and John W. Wilcut. "Rain-free requirement and physiological properties of cotton plant growth regulators." Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 88, no. 3 (July 2007): 247–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2006.12.002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Echer, Fábio Rafael, and Ciro Antonio Rosolem. "Plant growth regulator losses in cotton as affected by adjuvants and rain." Ciência Rural 42, no. 12 (October 23, 2012): 2138–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-84782012005000120.

Full text
Abstract:
Most of Brazilian cotton is produced in regions where annual rainfall exceeds 1,500mm, hence plant growth regulators (PGR) may be washed from the leaves before being absorbed. The objective of this research was to evaluate mepiquat chloride and chlormequat chloride washing from cotton leaves by rains occurring at different moments post spraying. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse. Both PGR were sprayed to cotton at pin-head square at 15g ha-1 a.i. with and without a silicon-based adjuvant, and simulated rains were applied at 0, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 and 24 hours after spraying, plus a control without rainfall. Addition of silicon adjuvant increased PGR uptake. Rainfall occurring up to 24 hours after spraying resulted in some PGR loss from cotton leaves, mainly in the absence of the adjuvant. The decreased uptake implies that in order to achieve the desired level of growth reduction, at least a fraction of the original PGR rate should be reapplied.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Corbin, Billy R., and Robert E. Frans. "Protecting Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) from Fluometuron Injury with Seed Protectants." Weed Science 39, no. 3 (September 1991): 408–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500073148.

Full text
Abstract:
Field experiments were conducted in 1986 and 1987 to evaluate the potential of growth regulators mepiquat chloride and chlormequat chloride as seed treatments to protect cotton from fluometuron injury. Fluometuron at two and three times the recommended use rate reduced cotton stand and height on Taloka and Convent silt loam soils both years. Cotton grown on a Sharkey silty clay soil was not injured by fluometuron. Mepiquat chloride and chlormequat chloride increased cotton stands on a Taloka silt loam soil when averaged over rates and years. In general, fluometuron injury to cotton was not reduced by treating seed with 1000 ppmw concentrations of chlormequat chloride or mepiquat chloride. Chlormequat chloride reduced chlorosis and necrosis of cotton treated with fluometuron, but neither growth regulator eliminated cotton injury or yield reduction caused by fluometuron at two or three times the recommended rates.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Sable, S. S., G. R. Lahane, and S. J. Dhakulkar. "Effect of Various Plant Growth Regulators on Growth and Yield of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)." International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6, no. 11 (November 10, 2017): 978–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.115.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ahmad, Nazir, S. M. Masoom Shah Ras ., and Akbar Ali Rajput . "Efficacy of Plant Growth Regulators to Manage the Insect Pests of Cotton." Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2, no. 7 (March 15, 2003): 544–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2003.544.547.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Trevisan, Rodrigo, Natanael Vilanova Júnior, Mateus Eitelwein, and José Molin. "Management of Plant Growth Regulators in Cotton Using Active Crop Canopy Sensors." Agriculture 8, no. 7 (July 2, 2018): 101. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8070101.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ferreira, Alexandre Cunha de Barcellos, Fernando Mendes Lamas, Giovani Greigh de Brito, and Ana Luiza Dias Coelho Borin. "Water deficit in cotton plant originated from seeds treated with growth regulator." Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 43, no. 4 (December 2013): 417–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1983-40632013000400011.

Full text
Abstract:
Mepiquat chloride (MC) is widely used for controlling cotton plant growth. Shoot growth modifications may affect root growth and, consequently, interfere with the cotton sensitivity to water deficit. This study aimed at evaluating the water deficit effects, in initial phenological stages of cotton plants from seeds treated with MC doses, on shoot and root growth. Two experiments were carried out in a greenhouse, in Santa Helena de Goiás, Goiás State, Brazil, in a randomized blocks design, in a 4x4 factorial scheme: four growth regulator doses (0 g, 2 g, 4 g and 8 g of active ingredient of MC per kg of seed) and four water stress conditions (without water deficit and initial water deficit in three vegetative growth stages: V1, V3 and V5), with four replications. Shoot and root dry matter, as well as cotton plant height, decreased with the increase of MC doses. The water deficit between V1 and V5 reduced shoot and root dry matter. The water deficit also increased the inhibitory effect of MC applied via seeds on cotton plants shoot and root dry matter.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Deol, J. S., Raj ni, and Ramanjit Kaur. "Production Potential of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) as Affected by Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs)." International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7, no. 04 (April 10, 2018): 3599–610. http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.406.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Cotton – Plant growth regulators"

1

Hood, L. R. "Multiple Plant Growth Regulator Use on Short Staple Cotton." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1993. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/209534.

Full text
Abstract:
A field trial was initiated during the 1992 growing season to evaluate the activity of Cytokin and Piz applied alone or in combination to short staple cotton. The Cytokin treatment significantly increased lint yield over the other treatments. There were no statistically significant differences between the non-treated check and any other treatment. The Cytokin treatment increased lint yield an average of 81 pounds over the check plots. Fruit retention remained high throughout the season, indicating that Pix would not normally have been needed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hood, L. R. "Multiple Plant Growth Regulator Use on Short Staple Cotton." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/210271.

Full text
Abstract:
A field trial was conducted during the 1992 & 1993 growing seasons to evaluate the activity of Cytokin and Pic applied alone or in combination to short staple cotton. The Cytokin treatment significantly increased tint yield over the other treatments in 1992. There were no statistically significant seed cotton differences between the non - treated check and any treatment in 1993. Fruit retention remained high throughout 1992 and very high throughout the 1993 season. Under high fruiting conditions, use of a plant growth regulator would not normally be recommended.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bariola, Louis A. "Using Plant Growth Regulators to Control Pink Bollworms and Boll Weevils." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1986. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219781.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Abdul-Razak, Mubarak Ali. "INFLUENCE OF GROWTH REGULATORS AND FERTILIZERS ON COTTON YIELD AND PLANT BEHAVIOR." Diss., The University of Arizona, 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/184196.

Full text
Abstract:
The effect of the plant regulator Mepiquat chloride (PIXᵀᴹ) (1,1-dimethyl-piperidinium chloride), in the early flowering stage, and combinations with soil and foliar application of fertilizers was investigated through seven field experiments conducted in 1982 and 1983 at three University of Arizona experimental locations. Three upland cotton cultivars (Gossypium hirsutum L.), 'Deltapine 55', '61' and '62' were used. Cotton yield, boll properties, fiber properties, leaf chlorophyll content, plant height, plant partitioning and maturity were investigated. Petiole nitrate, leaf area index (LAI) and LAI interrelationship with yield were also included in this study. The use of PIX resulted in an increase in seed cotton yield and boll weight in one of the experiments, while fiber properties did not show any significant response to either PIX or fertilizers. PIX, however, had the tendency to enhance maturity by about 1 week. Use of PIX reduced plant height in all tested cultivars at all locations. The reduction in plant height ranged from 7 to 28% depending on the cultivar, location and the amount of PIX applied. The chlorophyll a and b content of leaves increased significantly as a result of PIX application in two of four tests, while their ratio decreased. Leaf area index between treatments were not significantly different except at one sampling date. In a regression study, however, yield was found to be related positively to LAI when soil and foliar application of fertilizer were added, while it was negative when PIX was applied. Neither PIX nor BALANCEᵀᴹ (1:18:18:1) application affected plant partitioning nor petiole nitrate concentration at most of the sampling dates.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Rethwisch, Michael D., Greg Hurtado, and Rosario Hurtado. "Comparison of Various Plant Growth Regulators on Pima S-7 Cotton Yields." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/210772.

Full text
Abstract:
All plant growth regulators and nutritional products applied to Pima S-7 cotton during bloom economically increased lint yields, with increases ranging from 80 - 261 lbs. /acre. Greatest increase was noted with Boll-Set Plus, a product that contains raised levels of calcium and zinc. Cytokin and Boll -Set Plus significantly increased yields at one location. A lint yield increase of approximately 40 lbs/acre was noted when Tech-Flo Alpha was added to Cytokin. A single application of Foliar Triggrr resulted in equal yields as two applications of the Cytokin plus Tech-Flo Alpha.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Clark, L. J., and E. W. Carpenter. "Plant Growth Regulator Studies at the Safford Agricultural Center, 1993." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/209604.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Clark, L. J., and E. W. Carpenter. "Plant Growth Regulator Studies at the Safford Agricultural Center, 1994." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/210270.

Full text
Abstract:
Methanol, Cytokin and PGR IV plant growth regulators were tested on long and short staple cotton on the Safford Agricultural Center in 1994. It was a follow up study on Methanol and Cytokin and a first time look at PGR IV.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hofmann, Wallace C., Peter T. Else, and Ramadjita Tabo. "The Effects of Three Plant Growth Substances on DPL 90." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204039.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Norton, E. R., L. J. Clark, H. Borrego, and Bryan Ellsworth. "Evaluation of Two Plant Growth Regulators from LT Biosysn." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/198160.

Full text
Abstract:
A single field study was conducted during the 2004 cotton growing season at the University of Arizona Safford Agricultural Center to evaluate the effect of two plant growth regulators (PGRs) manufactured by LT Biosyn Inc. on the growth, development, yield, and fiber quality of cotton grown in the southeastern region of the state. This test was designed as a follow up study to work that was performed in 2003 on a grower cooperator site that demonstrated positive lint yield responses to the use of one of the PGRs used in this project. This was an eight treatment test involving the application of two PGRs, HappyGroTM (HG) and MegaGroTM (MG). The two formulations are intended to have different effects on plant growth and development. The HG formulation is a kinetin based product designed to enhance cell division and differentiation. The MG formulation is designed to enhance root growth early in the season. Several treatment combinations were designed to investigate varying scenarios of application of these two products alone and in conjunction with each other. The test included a control and each treatment was replicated four times in a randomized complete block design. Plant measurements were collected throughout the season to look for differences in plant growth and development. Lint yield was estimated by harvesting the entire plot and weighing the seedcotton with a weigh wagon equipped with load cells. Sub samples were collected for fiber quality and percent lint determinations. Plant measurements revealed extremely high fruit retention levels throughout the entire season with end of season levels near 75%. This high fruit retention resulted in very low vigor. Under these conditions, while lint yield was extremely high for this region (1300-1600 lbs. lint per acre), no statistical differences were observed among treatments. Fiber quality measurements also revealed no significant differences.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Clark, L. J., and E. W. Carpenter. "Plant Growth Regulator/Foliar Nutrient Studies at the Safford Agricultural Center, 1995." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/210773.

Full text
Abstract:
Methanol, Cytokin, Cytoplex, PGR IV and Foli-Zyme plant growth regulators were tested on long and short staple cotton on the Safford Agricultural Center in 1995. It was a follow up study on Methanol, Cytokin and PGR IV and a first time look at Cytoplex and Foli-Zyme. Trends toward increased lint yield were seen with Cytokin and Cytoplex with the other treatments yielding near or below the untreated check Some increase in maturity was seen on the short staple plots by all of the treatments. Some differences in HVI data were also observed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Cotton – Plant growth regulators"

1

A, Roberts J. Plant growth regulators. Glasgow: Blackie, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Roberts, Jeremy A., and Richard Hooley. Plant Growth Regulators. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7592-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Aftab, Tariq, and Khalid Rehman Hakeem, eds. Plant Growth Regulators. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61153-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Roberts, Lorin W., Peter B. Gahan, and Roni Aloni. Vascular Differentiation and Plant Growth Regulators. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73446-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Roberts, Lorin Watson. Vascular differentiation and plant growth regulators. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ebing, W., H. Börner, D. Martin, V. Sjut, H. J. Stan, and J. Stetter, eds. Herbicide Resistance — Brassinosteroids, Gibberellins, Plant Growth Regulators. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48787-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Fahad, Shah, Osman Sönmez, Shah Saud, Depeng Wang, Chao Wu, Muhammad Adnan, and Veysel Turan. Plant Growth Regulators for Climate-Smart Agriculture. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003109013.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Karl, Schneider. Alar, a widely used growth regulator, 1979-85: 178 citations. Beltsville, Md: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Karl, Schneider. Alar, a widely used growth regulator, January 1979 - February 1989: 255 citations. Beltsville, Md: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

International Conference on Plant Growth Substances (12th 1985 Heidelberg, Germany). Plant growth substances 1985: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Plant Growth Substances, held at Heidelberg, August 26-31, 1985. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Cotton – Plant growth regulators"

1

Noreen, Sibgha, Seema Mahmood, Sumrina Faiz, and Salim Akhter. "Plant Growth Regulators for Cotton Production in Changing Environment." In Cotton Production and Uses, 119–44. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tracy, Paul W., and W. P. Sappenfield. "The Influence of Irrigation, Row Spacing and Plant Growth Regulators on Nitrogen Management in Short Season Cotton, 1987-1989." In Nitrogen Nutrition of Cotton: Practical Issues, 107–13. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/1990.nitrogennutritionofcotton.c13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Oosterhuis, D. M., and D. Zhao. "Increased root length and branching in cotton by soil application of the plant growth regulator PGR-IV." In Structure and Function of Roots, 107–12. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3101-0_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Basuchaudhuri, P. "Plant Growth Regulators." In Physiology of Soybean Plant, 298–332. Boca Raton : CRC Press, [2020]: CRC Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003089124-11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

LOPEZ-LAURI, Félicie. "Plant Growth Regulators." In Postharvest Management Approaches for Maintaining Quality of Fresh Produce, 125–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23582-0_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Roberts, Jeremy A., and Richard Hooley. "Hormones and the Concept of Sensitivity — A Rational Approach." In Plant Growth Regulators, 49–67. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7592-4_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Roberts, Jeremy A., and Richard Hooley. "Introduction — The Challenge of PGR Research." In Plant Growth Regulators, 1–3. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7592-4_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Roberts, Jeremy A., and Richard Hooley. "Mechanisms of Action — Towards a Molecular Understanding." In Plant Growth Regulators, 151–63. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7592-4_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Roberts, Jeremy A., and Richard Hooley. "Commercial Applications of PGRs — Thought for Food?" In Plant Growth Regulators, 164–74. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7592-4_11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Roberts, Jeremy A., and Richard Hooley. "Biosynthesis and Metabolism — More than Making and Breaking." In Plant Growth Regulators, 4–33. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7592-4_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Cotton – Plant growth regulators"

1

Li, Ming-Feng, Jian-Qiang Zhu, and Zhen-Hui Jiang. "Plant Growth Regulators and Nutrition Applied to Cotton after Waterlogging." In 2013 Third International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Applications (ISDEA). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isdea.2012.246.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rudd, Joshua D., Gary T. Roberson, John J. Classen, and Jason A. Osborne. "<i>Data collection by unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to develop variable rate prescription maps for cotton plant growth regulators and defoliants</i>." In 2019 Boston, Massachusetts July 7- July 10, 2019. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.201900148.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Alvarenga, Elson S., Francielly T. Souto, Vitor C. Baia, and Maria Regina A. Gomes. "Chromenediones as potential plant growth regulators." In 15th Brazilian Meeting on Organic Synthesis. São Paulo: Editora Edgard Blücher, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5151/chempro-15bmos-bmos2013_2013101144241.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Amit Sharma, Geetika Dilawari, Randal K Taylor, Paul Weckler, John C Banks, and Toby S Osborne. "On-the-go Sensor System for Cotton Management for Application of Growth Regulators." In 2008 Providence, Rhode Island, June 29 - July 2, 2008. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.25058.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Muraviev, V. S., and L. V. Dyaduchenko. "THIENO[2,3-B]PYRIDINES DERIVATIVES AS SOYBEAN PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS." In STATE AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS OF AGRIBUSINESS Volume 2. DSTU-Print, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23947/interagro.2020.2.683-686.

Full text
Abstract:
We have carried out the synthesis and screening of soybean growth regulators in a series of substituted thieno[2,3-b]pyridines. The compounds, which have a high growth-regulating effect, were detected. According to the field tests, the substances have a positive effect in formation of the yield structure and provide seed quality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Karsunkina N.P., N. P., E. V. Eremina E.V., and M. Yu Cherednichenko M.Yu. "Growth regulators in agriculture and biotechnology." In Растениеводство и луговодство. Тимирязевская сельскохозяйственная академия, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.26897/978-5-9675-1762-4-2020-56.

Full text
Abstract:
The review is devoted to the history of the study of phytohormones and growth regulators. The features of the main classes of phytohormones and the prospects for their use in plant tissue and cell culture are also considered.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Pedro Andrade-Sanchez and John T Heun. "Sensor-based estimation of cotton plant height: Potential for site-specific plant growth management." In 2013 Kansas City, Missouri, July 21 - July 24, 2013. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.20131668472.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Arias Gaguancela, Omar. "Fatty acid amide hydrolases (FAAHs) regulate growth and development in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings." In ASPB PLANT BIOLOGY 2020. USA: ASPB, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46678/pb.20.1332306.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Taranenko, V. V., V. S. Muraiev, V. N. Chizhikov, and R. S. Sharifullin. "DEVELOPMENT OF GROWTH REGULATORS FOR RICE PLANTS." In STATE AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS OF AGRIBUSINESS Volume 2. DSTU-Print, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23947/interagro.2020.2.491-493.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

He, Ying, Sha Liang, Hao Zheng, Qiao Yuan, Fen Zhang, and Bo Sun. "Effects of plant growth regulators on callus proliferation of Chinese kale." In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRONTIERS OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING (FBSE 2018). Author(s), 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5085536.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Cotton – Plant growth regulators"

1

Christensen, Cynthia. The effect of plant growth regulators on the growth of Closterium moniliferum. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.5852.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Palazzo, Antonio J., Paul Zang, Robert W. Duell, Timothy J. Cary, and Susan E. Hardy. Plant Growth Regulators' Effect on Growth of Mixed Cool-Season Grass Stands at Fort Drum. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, September 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada319796.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Guney, Murat, Mozhgan Zarifikhosrohahi, Songul Comlekcioglu, Hakan Keles, Muhammet Ali Gundesli, Ebru Kafkas, and Sezai Ercisli. Efficiency of Various Plant Growth Regulators on Micropropagation of Hawthorn (Crataegus spp.). "Prof. Marin Drinov" Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, January 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2020.01.07.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Moskova, Irina, Bistra Dikova, Elena Balacheva, and Iskren Sergiev. Protective Effect of Plant Growth Regulators MEIA and 4PU-30 against Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) on Two Tomato Geno types. "Prof. Marin Drinov" Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, November 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2020.11.08.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography