Academic literature on the topic 'CRISPR system'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'CRISPR system.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "CRISPR system"

1

Huescas, C. G. Y., R. I. Pereira, J. Prichula, P. A. Azevedo, J. Frazzon, and A. P. G. Frazzon. "Frequency of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPRs) in non-clinical Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium strains." Brazilian Journal of Biology 79, no. 3 (2019): 460–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.183375.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The fidelity of the genomes is defended by mechanism known as Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) systems. Three Type II CRISPR systems (CRISPR1- cas, CRISPR2 and CRISPR3-cas) have been identified in enterococci isolates from clinical and environmental samples. The aim of this study was to observe the distribution of CRISPR1-cas, CRISPR2 and CRISPR3-cas in non-clinical strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from food and fecal samples, including wild marine animals. The presence of CRISPRs was evaluated by PCR in 120 enterococci strains, 67 E. faecalis and 53 E. faecium. It is the first report of the presence of the CRISPRs system in E. faecalis and E. faecium strains isolated from wild marine animal fecal samples. The results showed that in non-clinical strains, the CRISPRs were more frequently detected in E. faecalis than in E. faecium. And the frequencies of CRISPR1-cas and CRISPR2 were higher (60%) in E. faecalis strains isolated from animal feces, compared to food samples. Both strains showed low frequencies of CRISPR3-cas (8.95% and 1.88%). In conclusion, the differences in the habitats of enterococcal species may be related with the results observe in distribution of CRISPRs systems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Serbanescu, M. A., M. Cordova, K. Krastel, et al. "Role of the Streptococcus mutans CRISPR-Cas Systems in Immunity and Cell Physiology." Journal of Bacteriology 197, no. 4 (2014): 749–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.02333-14.

Full text
Abstract:
CRISPR-Cas systems provide adaptive microbial immunity against invading viruses and plasmids. The cariogenic bacteriumStreptococcus mutansUA159 has two CRISPR-Cas systems: CRISPR1 (type II-A) and CRISPR2 (type I-C) with several spacers from both CRISPR cassettes matching sequences of phage M102 or genomic sequences of otherS. mutans. The deletion of thecasgenes of CRISPR1 (ΔC1S), CRISPR2 (ΔC2E), or both CRISPR1+2 (ΔC1SC2E) or the removal of spacers 2 and 3 (ΔCR1SP13E) inS. mutansUA159 did not affect phage sensitivity when challenged with virulent phage M102. Using plasmid transformation experiments, we demonstrated that the CRISPR1-Cas system inhibits transformation ofS. mutansby the plasmids matching the spacers 2 and 3. Functional analysis of thecasdeletion mutants revealed that in addition to a role in plasmid targeting, both CRISPR systems also contribute to the regulation of bacterial physiology inS. mutans. Compared to wild-type cells, the ΔC1S strain displayed diminished growth under cell membrane and oxidative stress, enhanced growth under low pH, and had reduced survival under heat shock and DNA-damaging conditions, whereas the ΔC2E strain exhibited increased sensitivity to heat shock. Transcriptional analysis revealed that the two-component signal transduction system VicR/K differentially modulates expression ofcasgenes within CRISPR-Cas systems, suggesting that VicR/K might coordinate the expression of two CRISPR-Cas systems. Collectively, we providein vivoevidence that the type II-A CRISPR-Cas system ofS. mutansmay be targeted to manipulate its stress response and to influence the host to control the uptake and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Chapman, Brittany, Jeong Hoon Han, Hong Jo Lee, Isabella Ruud, and Tae Hyun Kim. "Targeted Modulation of Chicken Genes In Vitro Using CRISPRa and CRISPRi Toolkit." Genes 14, no. 4 (2023): 906. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14040906.

Full text
Abstract:
Engineering of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and the CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has enabled versatile applications of CRISPR beyond targeted DNA cleavage. Combination of nuclease-deactivated Cas9 (dCas9) and transcriptional effector domains allows activation (CRISPRa) or repression (CRISPRi) of target loci. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the CRISPR-mediated transcriptional regulation in chickens, three CRISPRa (VP64, VPR, and p300) and three CRISPRi (dCas9, dCas9-KRAB, and dCas9-KRAB-MeCP2) systems were tested in chicken DF-1 cells. By introducing guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting near the transcription start site (TSS) of each gene in CRISPRa and CRISPRi effector domain-expressing chicken DF-1 cell lines, significant gene upregulation was induced in dCas9-VPR and dCas9-VP64 cells, while significant downregulation was observed with dCas9 and dCas9-KRAB. We further investigated the effect of gRNA positions across TSS and discovered that the location of gRNA is an important factor for targeted gene regulation. RNA sequencing analysis of IRF7 CRISPRa and CRISPRi- DF-1 cells revealed the specificity of CRISPRa and CRISPRi-based targeted transcriptional regulation with minimal off-target effects. These findings suggest that the CRISPRa and CRISPRi toolkits are an effective and adaptable platform for studying the chicken genome by targeted transcriptional modulation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

La Russa, Marie F., and Lei S. Qi. "The New State of the Art: Cas9 for Gene Activation and Repression." Molecular and Cellular Biology 35, no. 22 (2015): 3800–3809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.00512-15.

Full text
Abstract:
CRISPR-Cas9 technology has rapidly changed the landscape for how biologists and bioengineers study and manipulate the genome. Derived from the bacterial adaptive immune system, CRISPR-Cas9 has been coopted and repurposed for a variety of new functions, including the activation or repression of gene expression (termed CRISPRa or CRISPRi, respectively). This represents an exciting alternative to previously used repression or activation technologies such as RNA interference (RNAi) or the use of gene overexpression vectors. We have only just begun exploring the possibilities that CRISPR technology offers for gene regulation and the control of cell identity and behavior. In this review, we describe the recent advances of CRISPR-Cas9 technology for gene regulation and outline advantages and disadvantages of CRISPRa and CRISPRi (CRISPRa/i) relative to alternative technologies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Karlson, Chou Khai Soong, Siti Nurfadhlina Mohd-Noor, Nadja Nolte, and Boon Chin Tan. "CRISPR/dCas9-Based Systems: Mechanisms and Applications in Plant Sciences." Plants 10, no. 10 (2021): 2055. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10102055.

Full text
Abstract:
RNA-guided genomic transcriptional regulation tools, namely clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats interference (CRISPRi) and CRISPR-mediated gene activation (CRISPRa), are a powerful technology for gene functional studies. Deriving from the CRISPR/Cas9 system, both systems consist of a catalytically dead Cas9 (dCas9), a transcriptional effector and a single guide RNA (sgRNA). This type of dCas9 is incapable to cleave DNA but retains its ability to specifically bind to DNA. The binding of the dCas9/sgRNA complex to a target gene results in transcriptional interference. The CRISPR/dCas9 system has been explored as a tool for transcriptional modulation and genome imaging. Despite its potential applications and benefits, the challenges and limitations faced by the CRISPR/dCas9 system include the off-target effects, protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence requirements, efficient delivery methods and the CRISPR/dCas9-interfered crops being labeled as genetically modified organisms in several countries. This review highlights the progression of CRISPR/dCas9 technology as well as its applications and potential challenges in crop improvement.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Yang, Jiayi. "Applications of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in cancer models." Theoretical and Natural Science 21, no. 1 (2023): 28–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/21/20230804.

Full text
Abstract:
Cancer has a high mortality and prevalence rate in the world. CRISPR-Cas9 is one of the novel and most common gene-editing techniques. Compared with the first two generations of gene-editing technologies, CRISPR-Cas9 system has the advantages of easy design, low cost, high efficiency and so on. sgRNA guides Cas9 to the site of the targeted gene, and Cas9 cuts the DNA strand at that site, triggering the NHEJ or HDR mechanism so as to achieve the purpose of deletion or insertion. CRISPR-Cas9 can be combined with other factors for other purposes, such as CRISPRa, CRISPRi, and base editing. The CRISPR system now has been used extensively for research into biological mechanisms and disease treatments. Since cancer is controlled by genes, a number of researchers in recent years have looked at using the CRISPR system to treat cancer. The CRISPR technology has greatly improved our understanding of cancer and the factors that affect it, and has had a major impact on the study and treatment of cancer. CRISPR gene editing can quickly and efficiently generate gene knockouts and regulate gene expression to identify relevant genes that influence cancer growth. This review systematically introduces CRISPR-Cas9 and its application methods, delivery modes, and discusses some studies using cell lines and organoids in vitro and animal models for cancer therapy in vivo.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Shi, Yuqian. "CRISPR/Cas System in Human Genetic Diseases." Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology 74 (December 29, 2023): 78–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.54097/ztchmw71.

Full text
Abstract:
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated CRISPER/Cas system, as the current most popular gene-editing technology, shows great advantages of simple composition, good specificity and high cutting efficiency compared with other gene editing technology. With the rapid development of CRISPR-Cas systems, such as Cas9, Cas12a and Cas12f, can be used to edit the DNA of eukaryotic cells, and then successively found that Cas13a, Cas13b and Cas13d are targeted to the RNA merons. Through various modifications, scientists also developed a new type of the CRISPR-Cas system. With higher DNA-cutting activity, greater specificity, and smaller size than the natural CRISPR system, these engineered gene-editing systems form a powerful tool set for DNA sequence knockout, replacement, epigenetic editing, and even the activation and suppression of gene expression. Despite the potential problems in the practical application of CRISPR technology to be solved, it is believed that with further improvement, the CRISPR treatment technology will play a more important role in the prevention and treatment of human diseases, more perfectly and precisely. This review introduces the structure, functional mechanism and application of CRISPR/Cas system in human genetic diseases, and the current status and development of CRISPR/Cas system are summarized and prospected.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kiro, Ruth, Moran G. Goren, Ido Yosef, and Udi Qimron. "CRISPR adaptation in Escherichia coli subtypeI-E system." Biochemical Society Transactions 41, no. 6 (2013): 1412–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bst20130109.

Full text
Abstract:
The CRISPRs (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) and their associated Cas (CRISPR-associated) proteins are a prokaryotic adaptive defence system against foreign nucleic acids. The CRISPR array comprises short repeats flanking short segments, called ‘spacers’, which are derived from foreign nucleic acids. The process of spacer insertion into the CRISPR array is termed ‘adaptation’. Adaptation allows the system to rapidly evolve against emerging threats. In the present article, we review the most recent studies on the adaptation process, and focus primarily on the subtype I-E CRISPR–Cas system of Escherichia coli.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Heussler, Gary E., Jon L. Miller, Courtney E. Price, Alan J. Collins, and George A. O'Toole. "Requirements for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type I-F CRISPR-Cas Adaptation Determined Using a Biofilm Enrichment Assay." Journal of Bacteriology 198, no. 22 (2016): 3080–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.00458-16.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACTCRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)-Cas (CRISPR-associated protein) systems are diverse and found in many archaea and bacteria. These systems have mainly been characterized as adaptive immune systems able to protect against invading mobile genetic elements, including viruses. The first step in this protection is acquisition of spacer sequences from the invader DNA and incorporation of those sequences into the CRISPR array, termed CRISPR adaptation. Progress in understanding the mechanisms and requirements of CRISPR adaptation has largely been accomplished using overexpression ofcasgenes or plasmid loss assays; little work has focused on endogenous CRISPR-acquired immunity from viral predation. Here, we developed a new biofilm-based assay system to enrich forPseudomonas aeruginosastrains with new spacer acquisition. We used this assay to demonstrate thatP. aeruginosarapidly acquires spacers protective against DMS3vir, an engineered lytic variant of the Mu-like bacteriophage DMS3, through primed CRISPR adaptation from spacers present in the native CRISPR2 array. We found that for theP. aeruginosatype I-F system, thecas1gene is required for CRISPR adaptation,recGcontributes to (but is not required for) primed CRISPR adaptation,recDis dispensable for primed CRISPR adaptation, and finally, the ability of a putative priming spacer to prime can vary considerably depending on the specific sequences of the spacer.IMPORTANCEOur understanding of CRISPR adaptation has expanded largely through experiments in type I CRISPR systems using plasmid loss assays, mutants ofEscherichia coli, orcas1-cas2overexpression systems, but there has been little focus on studying the adaptation of endogenous systems protecting against a lytic bacteriophage. Here we describe a biofilm system that allowsP. aeruginosato rapidly gain spacers protective against a lytic bacteriophage. This approach has allowed us to probe the requirements for CRISPR adaptation in the endogenous type I-F system ofP. aeruginosa. Our data suggest that CRISPR-acquired immunity in a biofilm may be one reason that manyP. aeruginosastrains maintain a CRISPR-Cas system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sasaki, Shigenori, Hirohito Ogawa, Hirokazu Katoh, and Tomoyuki Honda. "Suppression of Borna Disease Virus Replication during Its Persistent Infection Using the CRISPR/Cas13b System." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 6 (2024): 3523. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063523.

Full text
Abstract:
Borna disease virus (BoDV-1) is a bornavirus that infects the central nervous systems of various animal species, including humans, and causes fatal encephalitis. BoDV-1 also establishes persistent infection in neuronal cells and causes neurobehavioral abnormalities. Once neuronal cells or normal neural networks are lost by BoDV-1 infection, it is difficult to regenerate damaged neural networks. Therefore, the development of efficient anti-BoDV-1 treatments is important to improve the outcomes of the infection. Recently, one of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems, CRISPR/Cas13, has been utilized as antiviral tools. However, it is still unrevealed whether the CRISPR/Cas13 system can suppress RNA viruses in persistently infected cells. In this study, we addressed this question using persistently BoDV-1-infected cells. The CRISPR/Cas13 system targeting viral mRNAs efficiently decreased the levels of target viral mRNAs and genomic RNA (gRNA) in persistently infected cells. Furthermore, the CRISPR/Cas13 system targeting viral mRNAs also suppressed BoDV-1 infection if the system was introduced prior to the infection. Collectively, we demonstrated that the CRISPR/Cas13 system can suppress BoDV-1 in both acute and persistent infections. Our findings will open the avenue to treat prolonged infection with RNA viruses using the CRISPR/Cas13 system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!