Academic literature on the topic 'Criteria for classification'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Criteria for classification.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Criteria for classification"
Katz, Jeffrey N., and Matthew H. Liang. "Classification Criteria Revisited." Arthritis & Rheumatism 34, no. 10 (October 10, 1991): 1228–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780341004.
Full textMahr, Alfred, and Mathilde de Menthon. "Classification and classification criteria for vasculitis." Current Opinion in Rheumatology 27, no. 1 (January 2015): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/bor.0000000000000134.
Full textAkgul, Ozgur. "Classification criteria for spondyloarthropathies." World Journal of Orthopedics 2, no. 12 (2011): 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v2.i12.07.
Full textAkgul, Ozgur, and Salih Ozgocmen. "Classification criteria for spondyloarthropathies." World Journal of Orthopedics 2, no. 12 (2011): 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v2.i12.107.
Full textXavier Pi-Sunyer, F. "Obesity: criteria and classification." Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 59, no. 4 (November 2000): 505–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0029665100000732.
Full textChoromanska, Anna, and Ish Kumar Jain. "Extreme Multiclass Classification Criteria." Computation 7, no. 1 (March 12, 2019): 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computation7010016.
Full textStenholm, Björn. "Classification Criteria and Databases." Symposium - International Astronomical Union 155 (1993): 11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s007418090016992x.
Full textLeekwijck, Werner Van, and Etienne E. Kerre. "Defuzzification: criteria and classification." Fuzzy Sets and Systems 108, no. 2 (December 1999): 159–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00337-0.
Full textDubreuil, Maureen, and Atul A. Deodhar. "Axial spondyloarthritis classification criteria." Current Opinion in Rheumatology 29, no. 4 (July 2017): 317–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/bor.0000000000000402.
Full textUlucan, Aydin, and Kazim Baris Atici. "A MULTIPLE CRITERIA SORTING METHODOLOGY WITH MULTIPLE CLASSIFI CATION CRITERIA AND AN APPLICATION TO COUNTRY RISK EVALUATION." Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19, no. 1 (April 2, 2013): 93–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.763070.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Criteria for classification"
Chen, Ye. "Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: Classification Problems and Solutions." Thesis, University of Waterloo, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/2892.
Full text- Screening: Reduce a large set of alternatives to a smaller set that most likely contains the best choice.
- Sorting: Arrange the alternatives into a few groups in preference order, so that the DM can manage them more effectively.
- Nominal classification: Assign alternatives to nominal groups structured by the DM, so that the number of groups, and the characteristics of each group, seem appropriate to the DM.
Sorting problems are studied extensively under three headings. Case-based distance sorting is carried out with Model I, which is optimized for use with cardinal criteria only, and Model II, which is designed for both cardinal and ordinal criteria; both sorting approaches are applied to a case study in Canadian municipal water usage analysis. Sorting in inventory management is studied using a case-based distance method designed for multiple criteria ABC analysis, and then applied to a case study involving hospital inventory management. Finally sorting is applied to bilateral negotiation using a case-based distance model to assist negotiators that is then demonstrated on a negotiation regarding the supply of bicycle components.
A new kind of decision analysis problem, called multiple criteria nominal classification (MCNC), is addressed. Traditional classification methods in MCDA focus on sorting alternatives into groups ordered by preference. MCNC is the classification of alternatives into nominal groups, structured by the DM, who specifies multiple characteristics for each group. The features, definitions and structures of MCNC are presented, emphasizing criterion and alternative flexibility. An analysis procedure is proposed to solve MCNC problems systematically and applied to a water resources planning problem.
au, A. Bremner@murdoch edu, and Alexandra Bremner. "Localised splitting criteria for classification and regression trees." Murdoch University, 2004. http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20040606.142949.
Full textBremner, Alexandra. "Localised splitting criteria for classification and regression trees." Bremner, Alexandra (2004) Localised splitting criteria for classification and regression trees. PhD thesis, Murdoch University, 2004. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/440/.
Full textBremner, Alexandra P. "Localised splitting criteria for classification and regression trees /." Access via Murdoch University Digital Theses Project, 2004. http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20040606.142949.
Full textZowid, Fauzi Mohammed. "Development and performance evaluation of multi-criteria inventory classification methods." Thesis, Bordeaux, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020BORD0331.
Full textThis thesis deals with the issue of inventory classification within supply chains. More specifically, it aims to provide new alternative classification methods to address the multi-criteria inventory classification (MCIC) problem. It is well known that the ABC inventory classification technique is widely used to streamline inventory systems composed of thousands of stock-keeping-units (SKUs). Single-criterion inventory classification (SCIC) methods are often used in practice and recently MCIC techniques have also attracted researchers and practitioners. With regard to the MCIC techniques, large number of studies have been developed that belong to three main approaches, namely: (1) the machine learning (ML), (2) the mathematical programming (MP), and (3) the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). On the ML approach, many research methods belonging to the supervised ML type have been proposed as well as a number of hybrid methods. However, to the best of our knowledge, very few research studies have considered the unsupervised ML type. On the MP approach, a number of methods have been developed using linear and non-linear programming, such as the Ng and the ZF methods. Yet, most of these developed methods still can be granted more attentions for more improvements and shortcomings reduction. On the MCDM approach, several methods have been proposed to provide ABC classifications, including the TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) method, which is well known for its wide attractiveness and utilization, as well as some hybrid TOPSIS methods.It is worth noting that most of the published studies have only focused on providing classification methods to rank the SKUs in an inventory system without any interest in the original and most important goal of this exercise, which is achieving a combined service-cost inventory performance, i.e. the maximization of service levels and the minimization of inventory costs. Moreover, most of the existing studies have not considered large and real-life datasets to recommend the run of MCIC technique for real life implementations. Thus, this thesis proposes first to evaluate the inventory performance (cost and service) of existing MCIC methods and to provide various alternative classification methods that lead to higher service and cost performance. More specifically, three unsupervised machine learning methods are proposed and analyzed: the Agglomerative hierarchical clustering, the Gaussian mixture model and K-means. In addition, other hybrid methods within the MP and MCDM approaches are also developed. These proposed methods represent a hybridization of the TOPSIS and Ng methods with the triangular distribution, the Simple additive weighting (SAW) and the Multi-objective optimization method by ratio analysis (MOORA).To conduct our research, the thesis empirically analyzes the performance of the proposed methods by means of two datasets containing more than nine thousand SKUs. The first dataset is a benchmark dataset originating from a Hospital Respiratory Theory Unit, often used in the literature dealing with the MCIC methods, composed of 47 SKUs. The second dataset consists of 9,086 SKUs and coming from a retailer in the Netherlands. The performances of the proposed methods are compared to that of existing MCIC classification methods in the literature. The empirical results reveal that the proposed methods can carry promising performances by leading to a higher combined service-cost efficiency
TAKEDA, Kazuya, Norihide KITAOKA, and Makoto SAKAI. "Acoustic Feature Transformation Combining Average and Maximum Classification Error Minimization Criteria." Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2237/14970.
Full textXing, Lihong, and Yaoxuan Xu. "Product Classification in Supply Chain." Thesis, KTH, Industriell produktion, 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-50398.
Full textCrysandt, Holger. "Hierarchical classification of sound signals with class separation based on information theoretic criteria /." Aachen : Shaker, 2008. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=017071704&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
Full textLiang, Wei. "An Introduction to Ambiguity and Instability: New Merit Criteria for Evaluating Classification Performance." W&M ScholarWorks, 2008. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539626865.
Full textAlves, Frederico Silva de Sousa. "Canine parvovirus and sepsis : SIRS criteria evaluation and implementation of a PIRO classification." Master's thesis, Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/19691.
Full textSepsis is a severe condition associated with high prevalence and mortality rates. Parvovirus enteritis is a predisposing factor for sepsis, as it promotes intestinal bacterial translocation and severe immunosuppression. This makes naturally parvovirus infected dogs a suitable study population as far as sepsis is concerned. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the differences between two sets of SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) criteria in outcome prediction, parallelly the possibility of stratifying and classify septic animals using a proposed animal adapted PIRO (Predisposition, Infection, Response, Organ dysfunction) scoring system was also assessed. The 72 animals enrolled in this study were subjected to a score for each of the PIRO elements (except for the Infection, as all were considered to have the same infection score) and to two sets of SIRS criteria, assessing their correlation with the outcome. The data was retrieved from the clinical records of the Infectious Disease Isolation Unit (IDIU) of the Veterinary Teaching Hospital (VTH) of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (FMV) of the University of Lisbon (ULisboa). Concerning the SIRS criteria, it was found that the proposed alterations were significantly associated with the outcome (OR = 4.09, p < 0,05), contrasting with the original SIRS criteria (p=0.352) that did not correlate with the outcome. No significant statistical association was found between Predisposition (p=1), Response (p=0.1135), Organ dysfunction (p=0.1135) or total PIRO score (p=0.093) and outcome. The results obtained reveal the need for consensual and more specific criteria to assess SIRS and sepsis. The results suggest that augmenting the criteria specificity may improve their prognostic value, thus making them more useful in clinical management and treatment decision. This work represents a contribution for the development of an approved set of criteria, to could contribute not only to the classification of septic dogs but also to the improvement of sepsis diagnosis. Further studies are still needed to conclude about the best criteria to be used, but this study can serve as base from which further studies can adapt and improve. Additional more specific criteria, mainly inflammatory and organ dysfunction biomarkers, should be added to the proposed PIRO scoring system in order to improve the its´ prognostic value and clinical utility. Further studies should focus on improving classification systems and finding new biomarkers that would allow a timely intervention in sepsis affected animals and improve sepsis survival rate.
RESUMO - Parvovirose Canina e Sépsis: Avaliação dos critérios de SIRS e Implementação da classificação PIRO - A sépsis esta associada a uma elevada prevalência e taxa de mortalidade. A Parvovirose canina predispõe para o aparecimento de sépsis secundaria à translocação bacteriana intestinal e imunossupressão. Este facto faz dos cães naturalmente infetados com parvovírus uma boa população para o estudo de sépsis. O principal objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as diferenças entre dois conjuntos de critérios de SRIS (Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistémica) sobre a sua capacidade de prognóstico, assim como avaliar a possibilidade de implementação de um sistema de estratificação de animais sépticos com base no modelo PIRO (Predisposition, Infection, Response, Organ dysfunction). Os 72 animais da amostra foram submetidos a dois conjuntos de critérios SIRS e classificados para cada um dos elementos constituintes do PIRO (com exceção da infeção, sendo que todos os animais foram considerados como tendo a mesma classificação para a Infeção), avaliando a sua relação com o desfecho. Os dados foram recolhidos a partir dos registos clínicos da Unidade de Isolamento de Doenças Infeciosas (UIDI) do HEV-FMV-UL. Em relação aos critérios de classificação SRIS, os resultados revelaram que a alteração proposta aos critérios originais resulta numa associação estatisticamente significativa com o desfecho (OR = 4.09, p < 0,05), contrastando com os resultados observados quando aplicados os critérios originais (p=0.352) que não se correlacionam significativamente com o desfecho. Não foi encontrada nenhuma associação estatisticamente significativa entre a Predisposição (p=1), Resposta (p=0.1135), Disfunção Orgânica (p=0.1135) ou PIRO total (p=0.093) e o desfecho clínico. Os resultados obtidos revelam a necessidade de critérios mais específicos para a avaliar SRIS e sépsis. Os resultados sugerem que o aumento da especificidade pode melhorar o seu valor prognóstico. Este trabalho representa uma contribuição para o desenvolvimento de um conjunto de critérios consensual e aprovado para a classificação de animais sépticos, servindo de base para estudos futuros. Mais critérios com uma maior especificidade, como marcadores bioquímicos inflamatórios e de disfunção orgânica, devem ser adicionados ao sistema PIRO proposto. Estudos futuros devem concentrar-se em melhorar os sistemas de classificação existentes e descobrir novos biomarcadores que permitam uma intervenção atempada em animais afetados por sépsis, melhorando a taxa de sobrevivência.
N/A
Books on the topic "Criteria for classification"
Woo, Carolyn Y. Y. Entrepreneurial typology and classification criteria. West Lafayette, Ind: Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic, and Management Sciences, Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, 1989.
Find full textConstantin, Zopounidis, ed. Multicriteria decision aid classification methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
Find full textNoble, Elizabeth B. Classification Pamlico Sound nursery areas: Recommendations for critical habitat criteria. Morehead City, NC (P.O. Box 769, Morehead City 28557): North Carolina Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries, 1991.
Find full textDoumpos, Michael. Multicriteria decision aid classification methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
Find full textWebb, T. H. Criteria for defining the soil family and soil sibling: The fourth and fifth categories of the New Zealand Soil Classification. 2nd ed. Lincoln, N.Z: Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, 2011.
Find full textLin, Chuan-Ju. Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc., 2000.
Find full textLin, Chuan-Ju. Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc., 2000.
Find full textLin, Chuan-Ju. Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc., 2000.
Find full textSmith, Gregory M., Jonathan Chun, Anatoly Nemzer, and Bob Richard. Test Procedures and Classification Criteria for Release of Toxic Gases from Water-Reactive Materials. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.17226/22276.
Full textPetti, Cathy A. Interpretive criteria for identification of bacteria and fungi by DNA target sequencing: Approved guideline. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2008.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Criteria for classification"
Baldini, Chiara, Rosaria Talarico, and Stefano Bombardieri. "Classification Criteria." In Sjögren’s Syndrome, 417–28. London: Springer London, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-947-5_29.
Full textCantini, Fabrizio, and Carlotta Nannini. "Classification Criteria." In Large and Medium Size Vessel and Single Organ Vasculitis, 3–8. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67175-4_1.
Full textGerosa, Maria, and Francesca Rovelli. "Non-classification Criteria." In Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome, 61–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11044-8_6.
Full textMeyn, Sean P., and Richard L. Tweedie. "Generalized Classification Criteria." In Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability, 465–91. London: Springer London, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3267-7_19.
Full textYazici, Hasan, and Yusuf Yazici. "Disease Classification/Diagnosis Criteria." In Understanding Evidence-Based Rheumatology, 65–78. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08374-2_3.
Full textBertolaccini, Maria Laura, Oier Ateka-Barrutia, and Munther A. Khamashta. "Classification Criteria for APS." In Antiphospholipid Syndrome Handbook, 15–16. London: Springer London, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-735-0_4.
Full textStenholm, Björn. "Classification Criteria and Databases." In Planetary Nebulae, 11–18. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2088-3_2.
Full textLee, Crystal Man Ying, and Stephen Colagiuri. "Diagnostic Criteria and Classification." In Endocrinology, 23–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45015-5_3.
Full textLee, Crystal Man Ying, and Stephen Colagiuri. "Diagnostic Criteria and Classification." In Endocrinology, 1–17. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27317-4_3-1.
Full textLinkov, Igor, Emily Moberg, Benjamin D. Trump, Boris Yatsalo, and Jeffrey M. Keisler. "Risk-Based Classification of Nanomaterials 1." In Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 123–31. Second edition. | Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2020. |: CRC Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429326448-10.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Criteria for classification"
Garg, Arti, and Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones. "Determination of Microlensing Selection Criteria for the SuperMACHO Survey." In CLASSIFICATION AND DISCOVERY IN LARGE ASTRONOMICAL SURVEYS: Proceedings of the International Conference: “Classification and Discovery in Large Astronomical Surveys”. AIP, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3059059.
Full textThompson, Roney L., and Paulo R. Souza Mendes. "Considerations on Flow Classification Criteria." In ASME 2004 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2004-60109.
Full textSingh, Rita. "Audio Classification with Thermodynamic Criteria." In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (IC2E). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ic2e.2014.23.
Full textSkupas, Bronius, Valentina Dagiene, and Miguel Revilla. "Developing classification criteria for programming tasks." In the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1562877.1563015.
Full textDobra, Andreea. "General classification of robots. Size criteria." In 2014 23rd International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region (RAAD). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/raad.2014.7002249.
Full textSzarucki, Marek. "Developing classification criteria for organizational problems." In The 6th International Scientific Conference "Business and Management 2010". Vilnius, Lithuania: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Publishing House Technika, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bm.2010.148.
Full textKriguer, Henrique, and Valerio Salomon. "MULTI-CRITERIA CLASSIFICATION OF SPARE PARTS." In International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Creative Decisions Foundation, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y2016.089.
Full textKitamura, Yoshinobu, Sho Segawa, Munehiko Sasajima, and Riichiro Mizoguchi. "An Ontology of Classification Criteria for Functional Taxonomies." In ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2011-48125.
Full textPetri, Michelle, Daniel Goldman, and Laurence S. Magder. "CS-29 Creation of a weighted SLICC SLE classification criteria and comparison with other SLE classification criteria." In LUPUS 21ST CENTURY 2018 CONFERENCE, Abstracts of the Fourth Biannual Scientific Meeting of the North and South American and Caribbean Lupus Community, Armonk, New York, USA, September 13 – 15, 2018. Lupus Foundation of America, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2018-lsm.64.
Full textIyer, Naresh, and Piero P. Bonissone. "Automated Risk Classification and Outlier Detection." In 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mcdm.2007.369101.
Full textReports on the topic "Criteria for classification"
Pypenko, Iryna. Classification of the Criteria for Cryptocurrencies. KRPOCH, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.26697/krpoch.pypenko.i.report.2020.
Full textLarsen, Poul Bo, and Daniel Vest Christophersen. The applicability of the GHS classification criteria to nanomaterials. Nordic Council of Ministers, May 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/na2019-907.
Full textWik, Ola, Pascal Suer, Anke Oberender, Ole Hjelmar, Jutta Laine-Ylijoki, and Margareta Wahlström. Consequences of Revised Criteria for Hazardous Waste Classification in the Nordic countries – the criterion for leaching (H15). Nordic Council of Ministers, December 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/tn2012-547.
Full textShulman, Jay, Timothy R. Williams, James E. Tupa, James A. Lalumandier, and Norman W. Richter. A Comparison of Dental Fitness Classification Using Different Class 3 Criteria: A Report of Consultation. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada255417.
Full textMoe, Wayne L., and Amir Afzali. Modernization of Technical Requirements for Licensing of Advanced Non-Light Water Reactors: Safety Classification and Performance Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1560535.
Full textMoe, Wayne, and Amir Afzali. Modernization of Technical Requirements for Licensing of Advanced Non-Light Water Reactors: Safety Classification and Performance Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1700535.
Full textFurey, John, Austin Davis, and Jennifer Seiter-Moser. Natural language indexing for pedoinformatics. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/41960.
Full textKnapp, Deirdre J., and John P. Campbell. Building a Joint-Service Classification Research Roadmap: Criterion- Related Issues. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada269735.
Full textManual for the classification of intervention best-practices with rural NEETs. OST Action CA 18213: Rural NEET Youth Network: Modeling the risks underlying rural NEETs social exclusion, December 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.15847/cisrnyn.mn1.2020.12.
Full text