To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Criticiam and interpretation.
Journal articles on the topic 'Criticiam and interpretation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Criticiam and interpretation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
John, Helen C. "Conversations in Context: Cross-Cultural (Grassroots) Biblical Interpretation Groups Challenging Western-centric (Professional) Biblical Interpretation." Biblical Interpretation 27, no. 1 (March 11, 2019): 36–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685152-00271p03.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This article considers how biblical scholarship might break out of its western-dominated, largely historical-critical mould. I argue that we might challenge the hegemony of ‘western worldview’ scholarship by capitalising on the interpretative insights of alternative worldviews; in that regard, I advance a cross-cultural methodology. Additionally, I advocate engaging with grassroots interpreters, thereby contributing to the decentring of scholarly biblical criticism. Finally, this article focuses on the value of interpretation through dialogue, which functions here on two levels: the researcher dialoguing with grassroots interpretation groups in cross-cultural settings, and the resulting grassroots interpretations dialoguing with western professional biblical interpretations. The potential of this approach is demonstrated using a case study: Mark 4:35-41 interpreted with Cross-Cultural Biblical Interpretation Groups in northern Namibia. The interpretative insights of grassroots groups in non-western contexts, free(r) from the influence of western worldviews and scholarship, function to highlight the equally contextual nature of mainstream professional biblical interpretation.
2
Duderija, Adis. "Pre Modern and Critical Progressive Methodologies of Interpretation of the Qur’an and the Sunnah." JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES 1, no. 2 (December 20, 2012): 181–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v1i2.1323.
Full textAbstract:
In this article I will identify and discuss the interpretational assumptions of two contemporary interpretational approaches to the interpretation of the Qur’a>n and Sunna that I refer to as premodern and critical progressive and explain their interpretational assumptions and implications. I will then discuss how these differences in interpretational mechanisms result in very different interpretations of verses to Qur’anic pertaining to husband’s unilateral right to divorce.
3
Farid Khafaga, Ayman. "Discourse Interpretation: A Deconstructive, Reader-oriented Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis." International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 6, no. 2 (January 4, 2017): 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.2p.138.
Full textAbstract:
This paper is based on the premise that discourse is always under the influence of different ideological readings which not only formulate its meaning but inspire various interpretations as well; hence, it needs a theoretical cover that could justify its multiplicity of meaning. This paper, therefore, discusses the possibility of introducing a deconstructive, reader-oriented approach (DRA) to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as a model of discourse interpretation. The paper tries to appraise the theoretical framework of CDA and to offer an overview of the fundamental propels of its interpretative task in the light of two poststructuralist literary theories: the deconstruction theory and the reception theory. The paper also endeavours to emphasize the deconstructive nature of CDA by shedding lights on its relationship with the above mentioned theories. The conclusion drawn from this paper shows that introducing a deconstructive, reader-oriented approach to CDA is relevant to the latter's interpretative nature enough to diminish a part of the criticism levelled against its interpretative framework concerning plurality of meaning; and to establish some sort of exoneration for its theoretical shortcomings. The paper recommends that DRA will bridge the gap between theory and practice as it offers a theoretical base to discourse which could advocate its critiques regarding diversity of interpretation.Keywords: Critical discourse analysis, deconstructive, reader-oriented approach, deconstructionism, interpretation, responsiveness
4
Brain, Michael. "Christ and the Church: Ephesians 4:8–10 as a Test of Theological Exegesis." Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology 28, no. 4 (November 2019): 418–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1063851219873162.
Full textAbstract:
Historical criticism often lacks the information required to determine the meaning of a biblical text, requiring readers of Scripture to engage with other interpretive approaches. Using Ephesians 4:8–10 as an example, this article demonstrates how theological interpretation, by bracketing out historical questions and examining scriptural figures and typologies, brings coherence to texts where historical criticism falls short. The article compares historical-critical interpretations of Ephesians 4 with patristic and medieval readings. Where historical-critical scholars have been unable to discern the precise meaning of the text, pre-critical readers understood it as having multiple meanings, each one cohering within the unity of the gospel narrative. Using this insight, the article offers a theological interpretation of Eph. 4, unifying the various interpretations in their common reference to the gospel, depicted as a story of Christ’s humiliation and exaltation.
5
Segura Peraita, Carmen. "Crítica a la interpretación heideggeriana de la sustancia aristotélica." Differenz, no. 1 (2015): 103–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/differenz.2015.i01.06.
Full textAbstract:
Estas breve estudio pretender profundizar en la comprensión que de la ουσία-ενέργεια ofrece Heidegger en el capítulo VIII del Nietzsche. Una comprensión cuyo objeto no es otro que dar cuenta de la historia del ser. Aquella que lo habría entendido inicialmente como physis, pero enseguida como ουσία, actualitas y finalmente como Wirklichkeit. De lo que se trata es de valorar la pertinencia de los análisis heideggerianos y también de sus conclusiones. Al hacerlo, la cuestión específica que aquí se plantea es si en su trazado esquemático de esa historia del ser Heidegger procede con coherencia fenomenológicohermenéutica en su manera de realizar la investigación histórica.
6
Fukunaga, Yuka. "The Appellate Body’s Power to Interpret the WTO Agreements and WTO Members’ Power to Disagree with the Appellate Body." Journal of World Investment & Trade 20, no. 6 (December 17, 2019): 792–819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340158.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The United States criticizes the Appellate Body for ‘making law’ by interpreting and applying the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements in disregard of the intention of WTO members. The criticism of the United States is not without legitimate basis in that Members have few tools with which they may weigh in on the interpretation of the WTO agreements, even if the Appellate Body makes an erroneous interpretation. As much as the Appellate Body’s contribution to the security and predictability of the multilateral trading system warrants praise, the dysfunction of legislative and political mechanisms to counterbalance the growing de facto ‘authority’ of the Appellate Body should be a cause for concern. Against this background, this article proposes a new mechanism that would allow Members to disagree with interpretations by the Appellate Body and pronounce their own interpretations of the WTO agreements. The mechanism would be built upon ‘interpretative declarations.’
7
Syahputra, Fikry Prastya. "Meme Ideational Meaning: Multimodal Interpretation." Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA) 1, no. 1 (October 17, 2018): 022–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v1i1.136.
Full textAbstract:
Meme adalah sebuah sarana baru dalam penyampaian ide dan kritik. Namun ada saat dimana isi dari meme tersebut menyinggung beberapa instansi atau perorangan. Oleh sebab itu kajian terhadap meme yang bertujuan untuk mengkritik merupakan hal yang menarik untuk diteliti. Dalam artikel penelitian ini meme yang dianalisa adalah mereka yang bertujuan untuk mengkritik keadaan sosial dan politik di Indonesia. Metode dalam artikel penelitian ini meggunakan metode qualitative. Serta teori yang digunakan untuk menganalisa adalah metafora untuk kata dan ideational meaning untuk gambar. Pada artikel penelitian ini ditemukan konsep-konsep kritik seperti; sindiran, kritik, moral, agama serta public awareness. Konsep-konsep itu juga terwakili oleh gambar.
Meme is a new means of delivering ideas and criticism. But there are times when the contents of the meme offend several agencies or individuals. Therefore, a study of memes that aimed to criticize is interesting to be analyzed. In this research article, the memes analyzed were those that aimed to criticize social and political conditions in Indonesia. The method in this research article used the qualitative method. The theories used to analyze were metaphors for words and ideational meaning for images. In this research article there were criticisms found such as; sarcasm, criticism, morality, religion and public awareness. The concepts were also represented by pictures.
8
Mursida, Siti. "INTERPRETASI MOH. E HASIM DALAM TAFSIR AYAT SUCI LENYEUPANEUN TERHADAP FENOMENA TAKLID." Dar el-Ilmi : jurnal studi keagamaan, pendidikan dan humaniora 8, no. 1 (April 12, 2021): 36–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.52166/darelilmi.v8i1.2397.
Full textAbstract:
This article discusses the interpretation of Moh. E. Hasim on the phenomenon of taklid that exist in society. At the beginning of the 20th century the phenomena of bid’ah, tahayul, and khurafat were issues that developed at that time. According to Hashim, this phenomenon cannot be separated from the taklid buta that develops in society. Moh. E. Hasim is a very critical modernist figure from the Priangan Sundanese land. This can be seen from many of his interpretations criticizing phenomena that exist in society. Hasim pondered his interpretation in a Sundanese nuanced interpretation entitled the interpretation of the holy verse lenyeupaneun. In his interpretation hasim is very critical. Because according to hasim this causes heresy to the people. The results of this study indicate that the interpretation of hasim does not only include interpreting the meaning of the verse, but also includes criticism of the phenomena that exist in society. This shows that an interpretation will not be separated from the context aspect of the interpreter (horizon teks).
9
Sarma, Arup Jyoti. "Self-Other Relationship, History and Interpretation." Culture and Dialogue 5, no. 2 (December 4, 2017): 210–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/24683949-12340033.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This paper offers a critical appraisal of Gadamer’s dialogical philosophy of the self-other relationship within the context of interpretation and historical consciousness. According to Gadamer hermeneutics is a theory of interpretation or, rather, the art of interpretation. The task of philosophical hermeneutics is to narrate an ontology of human understanding with the ethical intent of restoring to interpretation a greater sense of “integrity.” The “hermeneutic universe” belongs to the individual worldviews whose structure and content are constructed on the basis of historical precedents. Gadamer situates these precedents in historicity and the tradition of culture, which are resources for their unique interpretations. Gadamer claims that interpretative understanding encounters the other in the dialogical “play” (Spiel) of an ever-unfinished event. The self and the other belong to the horizon of historical consciousness, and it is through this common horizon that the alterity of the other comes into expression.
10
Rabbany T, Al-Faiz M., and Indal Abror. "TAFSIR PROGRESIF ATAS KISAH-KISAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN KARYA EKO PRASETYO." Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis 19, no. 1 (October 12, 2019): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-05.
Full textAbstract:
Kitab Pembebasan is Eko Prasetyo’s first work in the field of interpretation contains the stories of prophets and friends in the Qur'an. For him, the stories of the prophets no longer have the power to change circumstances, then progressive logic brings Eko to an interpretation of the stories of the prophet to the surrounding social problems. When many commentators who interpret the Quran relate to the social community, then interpreting the Quran leads to social criticism being unique to discuss. So this paper is focused on discussing social criticism in the Book of Liberation. In this paper, there are indications of the content of social criticism Eko Prasetyo then grouped them into five fields, namely economics, religion, education, politics and society. Then explained based on the theme specifically. Then develop social criticism based on each theme. Among them is a criticism of the economic system of capitalism, interpretation of the meaning of Satan, tyranny, seditious and idolatrous, religious and financiers, criticism of Suharto and the New Order, the case of the murderous activist Salim deer. Also, Eko's other works were reviewed to develop his criticisms. The interpretation for Eko through the Book of Liberation is the contextualization of the problems that occur around him, Eko does not care about the interpretation of the interpretation, because for Eko, the Qur'an is a book of movements that must be practiced.Keyword: Eko Prasetyo, Progressive Interpretations, Qissah, al-Qur’an
11
Chetwynd, Jane, and Tony Rayner. "Critical Interpretation or Interpretive Criticism? A Reply to Woodfield." Addiction 83, no. 9 (September 1988): 1037–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1988.tb00528.x.
Full text
12
Scholz, Gunther. "Are text interpretations fictions?" Semiotic studies 2, no. 4 (December 28, 2022): 44–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-4-44-52.
Full textAbstract:
In the 19th century philology became the most important human science following history, and the interpretation methods were refined. However, in the 20th century, fundamental doubts arose about the possibility and the sense of the interpretation procedure, and an increasingly sharp criticism was expressed. It was aimed at the presupposition of a certain, unchangeable meaning of the texts. The diversity of interpretations seemed to confirm that. The interpretations could also be called "fictions". However, this essential doubt about a certainty of the text meaning contradicts the linguistic communication in the society. These critics ignore the fact that there are very different forms of texts and the interpretations in different cultural areas pursue very different objectives. It is reasonable to distinguish between criticism and hermeneutics to regulate the controversy of interpretations: while the latter tries to explore the author's perspective, in criticism the interpreter is allowed to bring his own perspective to bear. These two concepts are usually related in the interpretation process, but can be separated in case of controversy.
13
Lester, J. C. "ADVERSUS “ADVERSUS HOMO ECONOMICUS”: CRITIQUE OF THE “CRITIQUE OF LESTER’S ACCOUNT OF INSTRUMENTAL RATIONALITY”." MEST Journal 10, no. 2 (July 15, 2022): 124–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.12709/mest.10.10.02.13.
Full textAbstract:
This essay goes through Frederick 2015 (the critique) in some detail, responding to the various paraphrases and criticisms therein. It is argued that in each case the critique is mistaken about what Lester 2012 (Escape from Leviathan: EfL) says, or about what the critique presents as a sound criticism, or both. Introduction: the three problems with the critique and the philosophical problem that EfL is attempting to solve. “Abstract”: the critique’s confusion about EfL’s aprioristic theory of instrumental rationality. There are then detailed replies (too many and too diverse to summarise) to quotations from the critique’s confused interpretations and criticisms under the following headings (quoted from the critique): “2. Instrumental Rationality”; 3. Weakness of Will”; “4. Desires and Values”; “5. Free Will”; “6. Self-Interest”; “7. Maximisation”; “8. Morals”. Finally, in “9. Conclusion”, the philosophical problem for economics is briefly restated. The philosophical interpretation of homo economicus in EfL (as with its overall philosophical theory of libertarianism) has yet to be given adequate critical consideration.
14
Dizajy, Vida, and Mohammadreza Aram. "A Comparative Study of the Interpretation of Prophet Jesus' Verses Based on the Interpretation of Judge Numan and Al-Bahrani." International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 7, no. 8 (September 4, 2020): 443. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i8.1944.
Full textAbstract:
The Book of Basis of Interpretation by Judge Numan is one of the most important Ismaili books that expresses its interpretative views on many verses. This study seeks to answer the important question of how do Judges Numan's interpretations coincide with the narrations of Allameh al-Bahrani in relation to the verses of Jesus (A.s)? This research is the documentary-analytical method and seeks to analyze the verses concerning Jesus (PBUH) in two books: The Basis of Interpretation and "Al-Burhan in the Interpretation of the Qur'an", the aspects of these two views being shared and differentiated. Explain and, through it, examine and criticize Judge Numan's intellectual foundations. The findings of this research show that Judge Numan, in his commentary and especially in his interpretations, has used his mental aptitudes more than he has expressed in a humorous way, except in very rare cases that he has not used the Ahlul-Bayt (A.S) narrations. Is and does not refer to its sources of interpretation. But an evaluation of the traditions in the book of Alburhan shows that more than half of all traditions are weak and less than a quarter of the relevant traditions are reliable. In this way, the narrations that Numan quotes from Alburhan cannot be cited. Despite Judge Numan's intellectual concessions to the issue of interpretation, there are serious drawbacks and ambiguities in his view that we will examine and critique in this article.
15
Theil, Stefan. "Is the Living Instrument Approach of the European Court of Human Rights Compatible with the ECHR and International Law?" European Public Law 23, Issue 3 (August 1, 2017): 587–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/euro2017033.
Full textAbstract:
The article offers a rebuttal of prominent criticisms directed against the ‘living instrument’ interpretative approach of the European Court of Human Rights. The article initially introduces the basic application of the interpretative approach as adopted by the Court and then considers whether it is compatible with the Convention and broader International Law. The article argues that the Preamble, subsequent State practice and preparatory work offer inconclusive evidence to both critics and supporters of the ‘living instrument’. However, the interpretative approach can claim democratic endorsement through States, while arguments based on the necessity to consider domestic interpretations of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) cannot support a restrictive interpretation as a matter of International Law. The ‘living instrument’ further appears compatible in the context of state sovereignty in International Law, and broader institutional concerns with the role of judges in the adjudication of rights. Ultimately, the ‘living instrument’ interpretative approach therefore appears legal under the Convention and relevant International Law.
16
Meer, Rudolf. "Cogito, ergo est cogitabile. Cogitabile est, ergo cogito." Studies in Transcendental Philosophy 2, no. 2 (2021): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.18254/s271326680016819-0.
Full textAbstract:
Over the last two decades, the controversy between conceptualists and nonconceptualists has provided important insights into Kant’s critical project and especially the transcendental deduction. At the same time, the differentiation of the various positions has led to a seemingly unsolvable paradox in interpretation. However, if the intensifications of the debate are withdrawn and the current positions are placed in the context of historical interpretations, it becomes apparent that a nonconceptualism can indeed be developed without coming into (irresolvable) conflict with Kant’s conceptualism. In this sense, Alois Riehl proposes in his Philosophical Criticism (vol. 1) a so-called state nonconceptualism. Even if he does not have the terminology in use today, he can defend this on par with the current debate especially with regard to A 89–90 / B 122–123. In doing so, Riehl’s realistic interpretation of Kant’s transcendental idealism offers strategies that again question a hasty skepticism towards nonconceptualist interpretations.
17
Umam, Miftahul. "Socio-Political Criticism of the New Order in the Interpretation of Syu'bah Asa." Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan 6, no. 2 (December 31, 2022): 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v6i2.5518.
Full textAbstract:
<p><span lang="EN-US">In this study, the author explains the contribution of Syu'bah Asa in the Qur'an interpretation in Indonesia through his work</span><em><span lang="EN-US">, Dalam Cahaya Al-Qur’an: Tafsir Ayat-ayat Sosial Politik</span></em><span lang="EN-US">, a contextual socio-politics interpreting of the New Order government. The discourse in this interpretation was developed in a critical, straightforward, and bold content, aiming at a critique of various misappropriations during the New Order. This research is a literature study with descriptive analysis methods, which helps the author see Syu'bah Asa’s knowledge metamorphosis, approach, socio-political criticism, and interpretations’ contribution to the intellectual development of Islam in Indonesia. The results of this study confirm that the text of the Qur'an should be read in a social context when the Qur'an is derived, which helps us to find the moral legality of a verse that can be applied in socio-political dynamics that are constantly changing. The critical interpretation carried out by Syu'bah Asa is one of the slick examples of various contextual interpretations. Syu’bah Asa’s work has contributed to an understanding of socio-political dynamics in Indonesia, which at that time was not much explored.</span></p>
18
Fadil, Marjan. "Ideological Exegesis: The Critical Study of Contemporary Interpretive Methodologies." Takwil: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (June 6, 2022): 51–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.32939/twl.v1i1.1257.
Full textAbstract:
The development of exegesis covered the ideology of the interpreter which is influenced by education, the sect adopted and the environment that surrounds the interpreter. The belief held by the commentator is then turned into a truth which sometimes blames other interpretations. The ideology of this interpretation can be found when Islam had developed during the tabi'in period, namely when a period of the emergence of various works of interpretation with the style of Sufism, theology, fikh, linguistics and so on. This ideological interpretation is then seen by contemporary commentators as a weakness of the previous interpretation. This study reveals various arguments from contemporary commentators regarding the methodology of interpretation, the ideology of interpretation to the subjectivity of previous commentators. This methodological criticism by contemporary experts is formulated in several important points as recommendations for the present.
19
Everaert, Jonas, Michael V. Bronstein, Tyrone D. Cannon, and Jutta Joormann. "Looking Through Tinted Glasses: Depression and Social Anxiety Are Related to Both Interpretation Biases and Inflexible Negative Interpretations." Clinical Psychological Science 6, no. 4 (January 19, 2018): 517–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2167702617747968.
Full textAbstract:
Interpretation bias is often theorized to play a critical role in depression and social anxiety. To date, it remains unknown how interpretation bias exerts its toxic effects. Interpretation inflexibility may be an important determinant of how distorted interpretations affect emotional well-being. This study investigated interpretation bias and inflexibility in relation to depression severity and social anxiety. Participants ( N = 212) completed a novel cognitive task that simultaneously measured bias and inflexibility in the interpretation of unfolding ambiguous situations. Depression severity was associated with increased negative and decreased positive interpretation biases. Social anxiety was associated with increased negative interpretation bias. Critically, both symptom types were related to reduced revision of negative interpretations by disconfirmatory positive information. These findings suggest that individuals with more severe depression or social anxiety make more biased and inflexible interpretations. Future work examining cognitive risk for depression and anxiety could benefit from examining both these factors.
20
Nordin, Andreas, and Ninni Wahlström. "Transnational policy discourses on ‘teacher quality’: An educational connoisseurship and criticism approach." Policy Futures in Education 17, no. 3 (January 9, 2019): 438–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1478210318819200.
Full textAbstract:
In this article, we analyse key policy documents on teacher quality produced by the OECD and the EU during the period 2005 to 2017 using an educational connoisseurship and criticism approach. The purpose of this article is to explore how Eisner’s concepts of educational connoisseurship and educational criticism can be understood and used to analyse educational policy, especially how teacher quality is discursively constructed in transnational authoritative texts on education policy. Eisner’s three aspects of criticism, description, interpretation and evaluation can be utilised in a differentiated critical approach to the analysis of transnational policy documents on education. While the critical descriptive discourse can be viewed as ‘identifying a simple relationship’ between social development and educational needs, the interpretative critical discourse can be regarded as ‘recognising the complexity’ of teachers’ tasks in changing societies and the critical evaluative discourse as ‘recognising and problematising contradictory interests’ that affect teachers’ work. We argue that the philosophical concepts of connoisseurship and criticism contribute to policy research by demonstrating that a multifaceted concept of teacher quality is needed to capture the complex nature of education.
21
Moath Alnaief and Kotb Rissouni. "A Critical Analysis of the Claim that Absolute Juristic Interpretation (Ijtihād) Has Ended." Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 12, no. 2 (October 11, 2022): 28–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.32350/jitc.122.03.
Full textAbstract:
This article critically analyzes the dominant opinion prevailing regarding the foundation of Islamic jurisprudence (uṣūl al-fiqh) which states that absolute independent juristic interpretation (al-ijtihād al-muṭlaq al-mustaqill) is no longer possible. Therefore, based on the belief that this level of interpretation requires the creation of a unique method for deriving legal rules (istinbāṭ), a method that arguably ended with the founders of the primary schools of law. This research inspects a new interpretive method which was not developed by late scholars. Consequently, the article uses legal reasoning as an interpretive method to criticize the previous opinions regarding Islamic Jurisprudence by using both textual and rational evidence. For instance, the preservation of religion and the continued renewal of convenient sources requires scholars to reach the highest level of interpretation (ijtihād). In addition, a connection to the legal reality of the time and rulings were necessary to adapt them, an issue dependent upon direct derivation of rulings from religious texts or the freedom to implement secondary forms of evidence. Therefore, this research concludes that the founders of the traditional law schools did not develop their foundations independently. Instead, they did so through constructive investigation and analysis. Their interpretations conformed to the Prophet’s (SAW) Companions. Such a process continued and future independent scholars followed their footsteps. In addition, the legal reality in every age saw the rise of individuals who positively impacted the renewal of the foundations of jurisprudence by interpreting Prophetic hadīth which required advanced interpretative skills.
Keywords: Absolute Ijtihād, Ijtihād, Islamic law, Independent juristic reasoning, Madhāhib
22
Fry, Paul. "The New Metacriticisms and the Fate of Interpretation." Modern Language Quarterly 81, no. 3 (September 1, 2020): 267–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00267929-8351507.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Advanced schools of literary research today concur in their disapproval of unscaffolded interpretations of texts that “overhear” the presumed self-communing voices of authors in their solitude. Choosing from among the many antihermeneutic arguments, this essay responds in the main to the “historical poetics” of Virginia Jackson’s Dickinson’s Misery, with its reconsideration of the lyric poem and its place in the canon and reading practices of modern criticism. Neither direct interpretation of a text that lacks focus on its modes of circulation and transmission nor indeed any sort of interpretation at all has been a constant in the history of criticism. Interpretation has coincided only with periods in which literature as “secular scripture” was considered at once culturally important and difficult to understand—and not even always then, as modernist texts aimed to constitute their own interpretations. If poetry is understood as statement embedded in language, and if it is still both important and difficult, perhaps we can reserve a place for interpretations that are not wholly dependent on the mediatic circumstances of which Jackson and others have taught us to be more fully aware.
23
Zaret, David, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Contemporary Sociology 17, no. 1 (January 1988): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069485.
Full text
24
Senchuk, Dennis M., and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Noûs 26, no. 3 (September 1992): 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215966.
Full text
25
Gorski, Philip S. "SCIENTISM, INTERPRETATION, AND CRITICISM." Zygon� 25, no. 3 (September 1990): 279–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00793.x.
Full text
26
Rosen, Bernard. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (November 1988): 704–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780237.
Full text
27
Rosen, Bernard, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (November 1988): 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1982241.
Full text
28
Slavov, Matias. "Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Elements in Hume." Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14, no. 3 (September 2016): 275–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2016.0143.
Full textAbstract:
For the last forty years, Hume's Newtonianism has been a debated topic in Hume scholarship. The crux of the matter can be formulated by the following question: Is Hume a Newtonian philosopher? Debates concerning this question have produced two lines of interpretation. I shall call them ‘traditional’ and ‘critical’ interpretations. The traditional interpretation asserts that there are many Newtonian elements in Hume, whereas the critical interpretation seriously questions this. In this article, I consider the main points made by both lines of interpretations and offer further arguments that contribute to this debate. I shall first argue, in favor of the traditional interpretation, that Hume is sympathetic to many prominently Newtonian themes in natural philosophy such as experimentalism, criticality of hypotheses, inductive proof, and criticality of Leibnizian principles of sufficient reason and intelligibility. Second, I shall argue, in accordance with the critical interpretation, that in many cases Hume is not a Newtonian philosopher: His conceptions regarding space and time, vacuum, reality of forces, specifics about causation, and the status of mechanism differ markedly from Newton's related conceptions. The outcome of the article is that there are both Newtonian and non/anti-Newtonian elements in Hume.
29
Wathani, Syamsul. "KRITIK SALIM AL-JAbI ATAS HERMENEUTIKA MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR." el-'Umdah 1, no. 2 (December 1, 2018): 145–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.550.
Full textAbstract:
Criticism in interpretation studies shows a new phase of the interpretation of the Qur’an in contemporary academic studies of the Qur’an. Muhammad Syahrur is a fgure who became the object of criticism for some of his renewed ideas in contemporary studies of the Qur’an which are packaged in hermeneutics. Mahir al-Munanjad passed his book al-iskâ liyat Qirâ ah and Salim al-Jabi, al-Qirâ ‘at al-Mu’â shirat. This article focuses on Al-Jabi thinking with analysis on critical points. Al-Jabi made anBacademic criticism of Syahrur’s study, especially in the pattern of the approach used by Syahrur. Al-Jabi offers textual-contextual criticisms of the Shahrur approach patterned on language and thematic-historical analysis, which are often not in the context of the verses of the Qur’an.
30
Bustamam, Risman, and Devy Aisyah. "Model Penafsiran Kisah oleh Muhammad Abduh dalam Al-Manar: Studi Kisah Adam pada Surah Al-Baqarah." Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hadis 2, no. 2 (August 28, 2020): 199–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.15548/mashdar.v2i2.1695.
Full textAbstract:
This paper aims to criticize Tafsir al-Manar, Muhammad Abduh's monumental work as a pioneer of modern interpretation, which criticizes classical interpretative works, which he considers to be too story oriented, then offers a method of interpreting stories that focuses on `ibrah narratives, although not maximally. This study is a research library, using a semantic perspective as a knife of analysis, through three approaches; interpretation, content analysis, and hermeneutics. This study found that Abduh had applied the method of interpretation of the verse of the story that he had conceived. From the perspective of semantic interpretation and study, Abduh interprets verse by verse, studies the meaning of lughah, and reviews balaghah, munasabah, which focuses on hida'i (hidayah) and intiqadi (critical studies), and does not use hadiths. That is, Abduh is consistent with the Salaf pattern in interpreting the story, namely positioning it as mutasyabihat, and holding to the principle; tanziih, tasliim, and tafwiidh, and anti-takwil.
31
Schermaier, Martin. "Interpretatio triplex?" Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung 137, no. 1 (August 25, 2020): 493–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zrgg-2020-0011.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractInterpretatio triplex? Germanists and Romanists facing Savigny. This short piece was stimulated by some critical remarks of Kenichi Moriya to my interpretation of Savigny’s “Besitz”. The criticism helped me to shape my arguments on Savigny and to reflect my approach to pandectist studies on Roman legal sources. Thus, I propose a threefold interpretation of these sources in order to evaluate Savigny’s own appreciation: Before interpreting Savigny’s own interpretation we should interpret the pertinent roman text as well as its comprehension in the time of and before Savigny.
32
Umami, Khoirul. "Pseudopuritanism: Studi Al-Dakhil Atas Tafsir Majelis Tafsir Al-Qur’an (Mta)." FALASIFA : Jurnal Studi Keislaman 11, no. 2 (October 22, 2020): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.36835/falasifa.v11i2.367.
Full textAbstract:
This study will discuss the ambiguity of the Majelis Tafsir al-Qur'an (MTA) as a missionary organization trying to explore the sacred heirlooms in the form of Islamic law or trying to purify Islamic law, by making MTA interpretations as a reference for their da'wah, in the introduction to their interpretation they will not using the hadith daif, the history of Israel as a reference. However, in reality, they are precisely inconsistent with the principles of the teachings of making the Old Testament as the source of their interpretation. This research is a library research that seeks to explore and explore the interpretations carried out by MTA. Through al-Dhakhil's approach as a study of the theory of criticism of puritan ideological interpretation, it was found that the interpretation of MTA which became the reference of his da'wah, was inconsistent between statements and practice and made the old treaty as a reference in his interpretation and equated with Torah, even though the two were different.
33
Sládecek, Michal. "What does the „bedrock“ of rules consist of? Mcdowell on Kripke’s and Wright’s interpretation of Wittgenstein." Theoria, Beograd 55, no. 4 (2012): 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/theo1204005s.
Full textAbstract:
This text discusses McDowell?s position with regard to particular problems of Wittgenstein?s philosophy, primarily through his criticism of Saul Kripke?s and Crispin Wright?s interpretation of Wittgenstein?s understanding of rules. What these interpretations have in common are certain perspectives of the possibility of grasping rules, when the solution differs both from the explanation through interpretation and from the platonism of rules. According to McDowell, Kripke?s and Wright?s interpretation state that congruence of individuals and their behavior, that is, their use of language, comes before language norms and meanings. Normativity of linguistic rules is eliminated in this way, that is, it is compensated with description of current public use of language which basically does not follow Wittgenstein?s initial intention. Contrary to this, McDowell speaks about Wittgenstein?s emphasis placed on the autonomy of rules, as well as on the implicit normative basis of forms of life. The last part of the text considers justifiability of McDowell?s criticism of these two interpretations. It is also emphasized that beside the fact that particular objections referring to the importance of practice and interpretation are not sufficiently founded in writings of Kripke and Wright, there still is a significant criticism, which has substantially contributed to understanding Wittgenstein?s positions regarding rules and their practical basis.
34
Kubok, Dariusz. "Kant and Zetetic Scepticism." Ruch Filozoficzny 78, no. 3 (December 5, 2022): 7–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/rf.2022.020.
Full textAbstract:
This article examines Immanuel Kant’s criticism from the perspective of the preceding tradition of critical thought, with particular emphasis on Greek philosophy. Kant himself views criticism as a way to go beyond dogmatism and scepticism. On the other hand – as many researchers point out – Kant’s philosophy develops certain themes present in ancient scepticism. In the literature, there are numerous studies demonstrating Kant’s debt to the Pyrrhonian scepticism characteristic of Sextus Empiricus (ephecticism and epechism). In this article, I try to show that two different interpretations of scepticism can be formed on the basis of Sextus’ writings: zetetic scepticism and ephectic scepticism. Theinterpretation considers ἐποχή and ἰσοσθένεια as key ideas for scepticism and it is this latter option that is recognized in Kant’s thought by scholars, especially by Michael Forster. In my opinion, however, it is the first interpretation, not yet sufficiently recognized, that constitutes at least an equally strong complement to the first and may even be regarded as the proper source of Kant’s critical philosophy.
35
Nizhnikov, Sergei Anatol'evich, and Argen Ishenbekovich Kadyrov. "SIGNIFICANCE OF METAPHYSICS’ CRITICISM IN M. HEIDEGGER'S CREATIVITY." Metafizika, no. 1 (December 15, 2020): 38–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2020-1-38-46.
Full textAbstract:
Despite various interpretations of Heidegger's philosophy, he is undeniably a deep critic of the metaphysical tradition in European philosophy. His task of overcoming metaphysics once again aroused interest in the fundamental issues of life in the era of the total dominance of private sciences. In the article, the authors explore the concept of metaphysics and its criticism in the work of M. Heidegger, as well as subsequent interpretations, in particular by O. Peggeler (“New Ways with Heidegger”, 1992). Criticism of metaphysics was a necessary condition for overcoming it to build a fundamental ontology. Having experienced the influence of Nietzsche, Heidegger does not remain a Nietzschean, because he considers him the last metaphysician to be overcome. In this regard, Peggeler recognizes Heidegger's main work not as “Being and Time”, but as “Reports to Philosophy” (1936), where he sought to reveal the primary sources of the concept of metaphysics. Heidegger's views regarding the interpretation of the development of metaphysics in different historical eras are specially considered.
36
Kholmurodov, Abduhamid. "CRAFTSMANSHIP AND ARTISTIC ANALYSIS IN INTERPRETATIONS." CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES 02, no. 05 (May 30, 2021): 28–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-02-05-09.
Full textAbstract:
The article discusses in detail the contribution of literary critic D. Turaev to the current development of Uzbek literary criticism, the analysis of news and changes in the literary process, the features of new interpretations. Criticism of Munaqqid's analysis of works of art, his skill in the study of poetic and prose works created and being created during the years of independence.
37
ياس, خالد علي. "سُنَنُ النّص نَحوَ تأويل سوسيولوجي للعلامة السّردية : النّقد العربيّ الحديث مثالا." Ansaq journal 1, no. 2 (May 2017): 95–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.29117/ansaq.2017.0040.
Full textAbstract:
تحاول هذه المقاربة التركيز على الجانب الثاني من الوعي الجمالي للسيميائيات,باتخاذها البعد السّوسيولوجي أساسا معرفيا لها,متكئة على طروحات فلسفة ما بعد الحداثة( postmodernism ) ,وقد اتخذتْ من حقل نقد النّقد منطلقا إجرائيا تعتمده لإثبات رؤيتها الخاصة للنص,وقد تمَّ ذلك من خلال اختيار تجارب نقدية عربية حللتْ النّص القصصي على وفق منهج سوسيو ـــــــ سيميائي, لمحاولة الوصول إلى منهج متكامل في كشف آليات تكون سنن النّص السردي على وفق العلاقة الدينامية بين ما هو جمالي وما هو واقعي , وهو ما سعتْ إليه المقاربة لكشف اليات تأويل مغايرة للعلامات عن طريق المنهج السوسيولوجي المعاصر لتحولات النّظرية النّقدية.
38
Budrytė, Edita. "MENO KŪRINIO INTERPRETACIJŲ VERTINIMO PROBLEMA." Problemos 81 (January 1, 2012): 157–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/problemos.2012.0.1283.
Full textAbstract:
Straipsnyje sprendžiama problema, kaip turėtume vertinti meno kūrinių interpretacijas. Metakritinės teorijos dažnai nesutaria dėl to, ar pagrįstai interpretacijoms keliami teisingumo ir objektyvumo reikalavimai. Ypač daug problemų iškyla, kai susiduriame su prieštaringomis, tarpusavyje nesuderinamomis to paties meno kūrinio interpretacijomis. Straipsnyje atskleidžiamos dvi teorinės kryptys: kritinis monizmas ir kritinis pliuralizmas. Monroe Beardsley’is gina „vienintelės teisingos“ interpretacijos tezę, formuluodamas kūrinio „autonomijos ir nepriklausomybės“ principus, o Josephas Margolis siūlo atsisakyti tiesos kriterijaus ir taikyti reliatyvistinį požiūrį vertinant interpretacijas. Straipsnyje analizuojamos Margolio pateiktos reliatyvizmo kaip „interpretacijos logikos“, intencionalumo ir objektyvumo sąvokos.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: interpretacija, logika, reliatyvizmas, tiesos kriterijus, objektyvumasAssesment Problem of Interpretations of an ArtworkEdita Budrytė SummaryThis article addresses the question of how we should assess interpretations of artworks. Metacritical theories often disagree on whether requirements of justice and objectivity for interpretations are reasonable. In particular, many problems arise when dealing with opposite, incompatible interpretations of the same artwork. The article reveals two theoretical branches: critical monism and critical pluralism. Monroe Beardsley defends the thesis of “the only correct” interpretation of the artwork, formulating the principles of autonomy and independence while Joseph Margolis offers not to fulfill the criterion of truth, however, to adapt a more relativistic point of view for the assessment of interpretations. This article analyzes the concepts of intentionality and objectivity in relativism given by Margolis as “logic of interpretation”.Key words: interpretation, logic, relativism, criterion of truth, objectivity. n style="font-size: 11pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';">
39
Ul Haq, Zia. "Maududi’s Political Theology: A Critical Review of the Names and Attributes of God in Tafhim ul Qur’an." University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature 5, no. II (July 10, 2019): 184–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.33195/journal.v3i1.414.
Full textAbstract:
Maududi's"Tafhim ul Qur'an" is one of the interpretations that has been influenced by alien viewpoints, particularly in political affairs, as it is one of the major purposes on which Maududi based his methodology. As a result, we see Maududi interpreting many Qur'anic verses according to his own personal will and opinion, rather than consulting well-known and authentic Qur'anic sources, and because he was seeking power by any means possible, he attemptedto interpret the names and attributes in that direction. Of course, under the guise of establishing Islamic law, this type of interpretation has opened the way to rebellion against Muslim rulers in Islamic countries. This method also influenced radical Islamic groups, who used it to excuse their crimes in the Islamic world, and the Islamic world is currently beset by issues as a result of this trend. The purpose of this research is to reveal these political interpretations in the "Tafhim ul Qur'an," and wehave focused on the interpretations of God Almighty's names and attributes as Maududi explained them in a purely political interpretation without consulting approved exegetical sources. A comparative method is utilized in this article, in which I provideMaududi's opinions and then compare them to the interpretations of notable Islamic scholars, in order to determine the accurate meaning of these verses.
40
Rosenberg, Ruth, and Jerome J. McGann. "Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation." South Central Review 3, no. 4 (1986): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3189693.
Full text
41
Moloney, Francis J. "To Teach the Text: The New Testament in a New Age." Pacifica: Australasian Theological Studies 11, no. 2 (June 1998): 159–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1030570x9801100204.
Full textAbstract:
Modern critical biblical scholarship has long laboured under the belief that the object of teaching the biblical text was to communicate the original meaning of a traditional and canonical text. Contemporary criticism points more and more to the intertextuality of both text and reader in the interpretative process. The interpreter is inevitably inscribed in the act of interpretation. A reading of the Nicodemus material in the Fourth Gospel attempts to show that “autobiographical” readings need not abandon the achievements of more traditional forms of scholarship. Text, tradition, rhetoric and reader can combine to provide a reading of the text which continues and enriches Christian beliefs and practice.
42
Smith-Christopher, Daniel L. "Gandhi On Daniel 6." Biblical Interpretation 1, no. 3 (1993): 321–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156851593x00197.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractCultural exegesis represents an attempt to take seriously the issue of the perspective and background of the contemporary reader of the biblical text, particularly given differences in culturally determined perception. The promise of a "cultural exegesis" is not merely the recognition of cultural influence in textual interpretation, but the possibility that these culturally influenced interpretations can provide new directions for critical analysis for all scholars, and not only for those who share the cultural orientation of the specific reader suggesting a particular reading or interpretation. This paper takes Mahatma Gandhi's observations on Daniel 6 as a possible case of "culturally influenced" interpretation. Some of Gandhi's comments anticipate some of the more recent trends in the analysis of Daniel 1-6, while others lead in new critical directions entirely. At issue is not whether or not Gandhi was "correct" in his interpretation and use of the Daniel motif, but whether his comments (which drew on his particular cultural background by comparing Daniel to such Hindu figures as Mirabai) provide the basis for new scholarly investigations of historical as well as contemporary interpretations of the Daniel stories.
43
Uniłowski, Krzysztof, and Jakob Ziguras. "Textualism, Materialism, Immersion, Interpretation." Praktyka Teoretyczna 34, no. 4 (December 15, 2019): 13–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/prt2019.4.2.
Full textAbstract:
Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses.Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left– we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. The issues raised in this erudite and formally complex piece include such fundamental questions as: in what sense do the fictional worlds resemble the non-fictional one, and how do we inhabit them? What’s the relationship between immersion and interpretation? What real-life figures can help us imagine or visualise our intimate yet inherently social relationship with the fictional (are we guests, dwellers, passersby...)? Uniłowski looks for answers in contemporary Marxist criticism (Eagleton, Jameson, Berardi), sci-fi and fantasy writing (Lem, Sapkowski, Martin), as well as modern continental philoso phy (Gadamer, Heidegger) and – in the last part of the essay – contemporary game studies. We’re happy to be able to present Uniłowski’s piece in two versions, the original Polish as well as its English translation (by Jakob Ziguras). In order to preserve the unmistakable flow of Uniłowski’s thought in English, small changes were introduced – with the author’s full approval – in the English version. We trust that our Polish-speaking readers will fin the comparison of the two versions interesting and instruc tive, as they seem to give a unique insight into Uniłowski’s writing process.
44
Łakomy, Jakub. "Critical Jurisprudence of Duncan Kennedy and the Status of the Theory of Legal Interpretation." Krytyka Prawa 12, no. 3 (September 15, 2020): 70–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.396.
Full text
45
Eigi, Jaana. "On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle." THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 30, no. 3 (November 12, 2015): 449–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/theoria.13208.
Full textAbstract:
According to Helen Longino, objectivity is necessarily social as it depends on critical interactions in community. Justin Biddle argues that Longino’s account presupposes individuals that are completely open to any criticism; as such individuals are in principle able to criticise their beliefs on their own, Longino's account is not really social. In the first part of my paper I argue that even for completely open individuals, criticism for maintaining objectivity is only possible in community. In the second part I challenge Biddle’s interpretation of Longino’s conception of the individual. I conclude that Longino’s account is necessarily social.
46
Tatarenko, Natalia A. "Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit in New Sense (Reflection on the Book Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit: A Critical Guide)." Voprosy Filosofii, no. 12 (2020): 187–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-12-187-197.
Full textAbstract:
The article comprehends the features of Hegel’s philosophy of the late period, presented in the book “Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit: A Critical Guide” edited by M.F. Bykova. The author analyses the key points of Hegel’s philosophical system and demonstrates that the combination of careful textual work and, on its basis, the interpretation of philosophical ideas considered in the context of specific historical eras, plays an important role in conducting research in the field of Hegel studies. Since the philosophical works of Hegel are assessed as very difficult for reading and interpretation, and the principles of building his philosophical system and the development of the absolute spirit, as a result, are often misunderstood, it is not always possible to successfully accomplish such a task. The reviewed collective monograph serves as a good example of research work combining reliance on authorized text sources and grounded interpretations of Hegel’s philosophy within the framework of modern scientific and sociocultural knowledge. The articles collected in the book are devoted to various problems of Hegel’s philosophy of the spirit, presented mainly in the “Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences”, and reasonably show the relevance and importance of Hegel’s philosophy in our days.
47
Amrizal, Amrizal. "LANDASAN QUR’ANI DALAM HUBUNGAN ANTAR AGAMA: TITIK TEMU HERMENEUTIKA GERAK GANDA DAN TAFSIR FILOSOFIS THABATHABAI." Al-A'raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat 17, no. 1 (June 30, 2020): 139–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.22515/ajpif.v17i1.1955.
Full textAbstract:
This article discusses the Fazlur Rahman and Thabathabai thought on Qur’anic verses that can be used as a basis for interfaith relations. The discussion focused on their methodology of interpretations and responses to conventional Qur'anic interpretations. Fazlur Rahman with his double movement hermeneutics and Thabathabai with his philosophical interpretation. Although hermeneutics and interpretation are often disputed, the interpretation of these two figures has a common point that can be synthesized through logical dialectics. Both of their attention to philosophy and critical responsestowards conventional methods of interpretation became a thesis for the synthesis process carried out. Hereby, it can be found a synthesis about the Qur’anic basis which can be used as a guide for Muslims in fostering relationships with other religions’ followers. In addition, they also provide guidelines related to the way for a Muslim to behave towards the adherents of other religions, without having to believe in the inevitability of practicing religious pluralism in terms of interfaith relation. This synthesis, if it is drawn into the interpretation methodology, it is seen that there is a correlation between the results of the double movement hermeneutics interpretation and philosophical interpretation, at least in the term of ethics.
48
Faqihi, Professor Fazlurrahman. "تاریخچۀ تفسیرنگاری در هرات و نقد منهج تفسیر انوارالقرآن." ghalib quarterly journal 39, no. 4 (December 10, 2022): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.58342/ghalibqj.v39.i4.3.
Full textAbstract:
قرآن کریم، کلام الهی است و برای بیان معنای آن در طول تاریخ، تفسیرهای زیادی نگاشته شده است. در قلمرو زبان فارسی و بهویژه در هرات، در پهلوی تفسیرهای عربی، تفسیرهایی به زبان فارسی نیز نوشته شدهاند. یکی از تفسیرهای معروف و جاافتاده در زبان فارسی در دورۀ معاصر، انوارالقرآن است که مورد توجه همهگان قرار گرفته است. بررسی نقادانۀ این اثر، جایگاه آن را در نزد مخاطبان، برازندهتر میسازد و نیز میتواند راه را برای اصلاح کارهای آینده در این رشته از علوم باز نماید. این مقاله به هدف تبیین منهج تفسیری انوارالقرآن، به روش کتابخانهیی و با تمرکز بر متن تفسیر مذکور نگاشته شده، پاسخ میدهد که این اثر با چه روش و سازوکارهایی تألیف شده است. برآیند موضوع این است که در تألیف این اثر، چهار تفسیر دیگر مورد نظر بوده است. ترجیح دیدگاهها، بیان برخی احکام، حجم میانه، دوری از اختلافات و روش مأثور، مورد نظر نویسنده بوده است.
49
Allington, Daniel. "Private experience, textual analysis, and institutional authority: The discursive practice of critical interpretation and its enactment in literary training." Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21, no. 2 (May 2012): 211–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963947011435864.
Full textAbstract:
Academic literary criticism emphasises both the private experience of reading and the analysis of formal textual features. Since the early 20th century, this double emphasis has been sustained through the production of ‘readings’ or ‘interpretations’ in which claimed responses to literature are accounted for through textual analysis, a practice here theorised in terms drawn from discursive psychology. Conceptualising interpretation as practice renders it investigable through qualitative social research methods. This article thus studies the enactment of critical interpretation within a specific form of literary training, carrying out a turn-by-turn analysis of an undergraduate tutorial on Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest (1895). Within this classroom context, students use claimed private experiences to challenge a lecturer’s reading of the work, treat those claimed responses (some of which appear homophobic) as unnecessary to account for, and account for responses they reject in non-textual terms. For contrast, a short extract is provided from an established department member’s tutorial on William Wordsworth’s ‘Lines Written a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey’ (1798). It is argued that the two instructors’ very different levels of institutional authority are reflected in their teaching styles and in the resistance or compliance that their students exhibit towards the discursive practices of literary criticism.
50
López-Garay, Hernán. "Earthdream: A critical interpretation." Systems Practice 7, no. 6 (December 1994): 709–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02173503.
Full text