Relevant bibliographies by topics / Culpa in contrahendo – Germany

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Culpa in contrahendo – Germany'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 10 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Culpa in contrahendo – Germany.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Culpa in contrahendo – Germany"

1

Tegethoff, Michael. "Culpa in Contrahendo in German and Dutch Law – A Comparison of Precontractual Liability." Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 5, no. 4 (December 1998): 341–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1023263x9800500403.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bong-Seok Kang. "Culpa in contrahendo." Journal of hongik law review 10, no. 1 (February 2009): 49–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.16960/jhlr.10.1.200902.49.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

ARIKAN, Mustafa. "Culpa in Contrahendo Sorumluluğu." Selcuk Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi 17, SUHFD (July 25, 2009): 69–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.15337/suhfd.2017.119.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

DURAK, Yasemin. "Güven Sorumluluğu ve “Culpa In Contrahendo”." Selcuk Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi 25, no. 1 (August 10, 2017): 239–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.15337/suhfd.325488.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Barrientos Zamorano, Marcelo. "CULPA IN CONTRAHENDO EN MUTUO HIPOTECARIO." Revista chilena de derecho 39, no. 3 (December 2012): 829–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-34372012000300011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Stefanović, Zlatko. "Culpa in contrahendo: A methodological experiment." Pravni zapisi 1, no. 2 (2010): 315–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/pravzap1002315s.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Choong-Hoon Lee. "Culpa in Contrahendo in Chinese Civil Law." KYUNGPOOK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL ll, no. 38 (February 2012): 131–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.17248/knulaw..38.201202.131.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Harke, Jan Dirk. "Versicherungsvertragliche Anzeigepflicht und Garantiehaftung für culpa in contrahendo." Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft 95, no. 3 (September 2006): 391–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03353513.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kocot, Wojciech J. "Culpa in Contrahendo as the General Ground for Precontractual Liability in Polish Civil Code." osteuropa recht 67, no. 2 (2021): 202–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2021-2-202.

Full text
Abstract:
The justified and legally relevant relationship between contracting partners acting together in order to conclude a contract along with a comprehensive system of precontractual liability have been recognized in Poland at least since the enter into force of the Code of Obligations in 1933. Nevertheless until 2003 there wasn’t any specific legislative enactment of general duty of fair dealing in the precontractual stage. This article sheds light on the legal concept of culpa in contrahendo, with particular emphasis on questions of tort, contract or tertium genus, the objective character of precontractual liability, the scope of protected precontractual interest, and the adequate causal link and the moment of breaking off negotiations. The article concludes with an overview of the perspectives of culpa in contrahendo in the new Civil Code in Poland.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kuonen, N. "Père et fille: La culpa in contrahendo." Groninger Opmerkingen en Mededelingen 35 (January 1, 2018): 73–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.21827/grom.35.35648.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Culpa in contrahendo – Germany"

1

Otto, Michael. "Germany and South Africa : a comparative study of their concepts of contract law and mistake." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/49976.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (LLM)--Stellenbosch University, 2004.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The problem of mistake and its impact on the formation of contract is a central issue in the law of contract of all legal systems. The thesis investigates this area by considering the manner in which it has been dealt with in Germany and South African law. Although both legal systems are of the civilian origin. The German law is a codified system, whereas South African law is an uncodified one in which in the absence of legislation, legal problems are resolved by decisions of the High Court operating under a strict doctrine of legal precedent. German law does not in a formal sense acknowledge that judges can make law, but the thesis demonstrates the considerable weight that is nevertheless attached to judicial decisions in practice. The impact of differences in legal methodology on substantive law is a principal theme of the investigation. It is addressed by means of a systematic comparison between the manner in which the two systems deal with concepts such as heiuristic act and declarations of will, the notion of contract and the relevance of offer and acceptance as its constituent elements. Thereafter the broad topic of mistake as a circumstance that vitiates agreement and other defects of will such as deceit, duress and undue influence are considered. Whereas German law as a codified system presents a comprehensive regulation of the issues, a case law system such as that of South Africa can only deal with matters brought before the courts by parties engaged in a dispute. Because judges also tend to frame decisions as narrowly as possible, such a system characterised by gaps in the law in relations to issues that have not been authoritatively determined. The resultant uncertainty is exacerbated by the fact that different courts might decide the same issue differently and that a considerable period of time might elapse before the issue is settled by the highest court in the judicial hierarchy. In regard to matters of substance, both systems proceed from a common conceptual framework, but often tend to emphasise different aspects in coming to solutions. German law places great store on the notion of the declaration of will, a concept which is analysed in considerable detail in relation to its treatment in South African law. Although South African law recognises the notion of a juristic act, there is no sign of the refined and systematic discussion of the concept along the lines of German law. In consequence, concepts such as offer and acceptance play a less important role in South African law. In relation to the treatment of mistake as well the greater emphasis of German law on the declarations of will is in marked contrast to the more subjective approach of South African law and its resort to a theory of reliance as a corrective liability in cases of disagreement. Both systems adopt an approach with subjective and objective elements. but with a different mix of these elements in each instance. An overriding conclusion is that both systems might have erred in placing too great an emphasis on objective elements in the determination of when contractual liability should be imposed. It is contended that renewed attention to the doctrine of culpa in contrahendo might enable both South African and German law to deal more satisfactorily with the problem of disagreement in contract.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die probleem van dwaling en die uitwerking daarvan op kontraksluiting is 'n sentrale vraagstuk van die kontraktereg van alle lande. Die proefskrif ondersoek hierdie problematiek deur die hantering daarvan in sowel die Duitse as die Suid-Afrikaanse reg te oorweeg. Alhoewel beide hierdie stelsels van romanisriese oorsprong is, is die Duitse 'n gekodifiseerde en die Suid-Afrikaanse 'n ongekodifiseerde stelsel. In die afwesigheid van wetgewing, word regsprobleme in Suid-Afrika aan die hand van die gemenereg deur middel van beslissings van die hoë hof opgelos ingevolge 'n strenge presedentestelsel. Alhoewel die Duitse reg nie formeel erken dat regterlike beslissings regskeppend kan werk nie, toon die proefskrif aan dat daar tog in die praktyk groot gewig aan regterlike uitsprake geheg word. Die uitwerking van hierdie metodologiese verskille is 'n hooftema van die ondersoek. Dit geskied by wyse van 'n sistemariese vergelyking van die hantering in die twee stelsels van begrippe soos die regshandeling en die wilsverklaring. die kontrak en die rol van aanbod en aanname as konstituterende elemente van 'n kontrak. Hierna kom die breë vraagstuk van dwaling aan die orde as 'n omstandigheid war wilsooreenstemming ondermyn, asook die samehangende kwessies van bedrog, dwang en onbehoorlike beïnvloeding. Alhoewel beide stelsels in substantiewe aangeleenthede uitgaan van 'n gemeenskaplike konseptueie raamwerk. word aangetoon dat by die bereik van oplossings, die klem dikwels heel verskillend geplaas word. Van sentrale belang is vir die Duitse reg is die wilsverklaringsbegrip, wat in vergelyking met die behandeling daarvan. In Suid-Afrika in groot besonderhede ontleed word. Alhoewel die Suid-Afrikaanse reg, soos die Duitse reg uitgaan van die begrip regshandeling, ontbreek die genuanseerde en sistemariese behandeling van die Duitse reg. As gevolg hiervan speel die begrippe aanbod en aanname 'n relatief mlnder belangrike rol in die Suid-Afrikaanse reg. Met betrekking tot die dwalingsproblematiek ook is die groter klem op die Duitse reg op die wilsverklaring van die partye opvallend en in skerp teenstelling, tot die meer subjektiewe benadering van die Suid- Afrikaanse reg en die aanwending van die vertrouensteorie as 'n korrektiewe aanspreeklikheid in gevalle van 'n gebrek aan wilsooreesntemming. Alhoewel albei stelsels erkenning gee aan subjektiewe en objektiewe elemente, is daar verskille vir sover dit die relatiewe klem op elkeen aangaan. Die oorkoepelende gevolgtrekking is dat albei stelsels miskien te veel gewig gee aan die objektiewe element by die bepaling van aanspreeklikheid. Die voorstel is dat daar weer met vrug na die leerstuk van culpa in contrahendo gekyk sou kon word.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Olsson, Samuel, and Pacheco Axel Karlsson. "Culpa In Contrahendo vid Fastighetsköp." Thesis, Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för kultur och samhälle (KS), 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-22572.

Full text
Abstract:
Culpa in contrahendo är en inom juridiken framvuxen rättsprincip som avser att erlägga skadeståndsansvar för vårdslöst (culpa) handlande vid avtalsslut (in contrahendo). Principen härstammar från tysk 1800-tals teori och har därefter inlemmats även i det nordiska rättsområdet.I svensk rätt erkändes rättsprincipen för första gången genom målet NJA 1963 s.105 i så måtto att skadeståndsansvar utdömdes, dock enbart intill det negativa kontraktsintresset. Trots att bestämmelser enligt rättsprincipen ännu inte kommit till uttryck i lagtext så har den tjänat behjälpligt vid flera avtalsrättsliga fall.NJA 1973 s.175 blev första gången som culpa in contrahendo ställdes inför prov i en fastighetsköpsrelaterad fråga. Det kan diskuteras om HD över huvud taget tog ställning i om oaktsamhet hade förelegat under förhandlingarna samt om detta i så fall kunde föranleda skadeståndsansvar i den mån som förfarandet medfört skada för medkontrahenten. Vad som däremot uppdagades genom rättsfallet var svårigheten att tillämpa rättsprincipen vid fastighetsköp. Detta på grund av de motstridiga syften som föreligger mellan formalavtalet och culpa in contrahendo.Fastighetsköpets formkrav syftar till att eliminera risken för överilade beslut och grundregeln är således att parterna inte är bundna av köpet eller förpliktigade att uppträda med lojalitet sinsemellan förrän ett fullständigt kontrakt är upprättat mellan dem. Risken för culpa in contrahendo föreligger ju å andra sidan under förhandlingarna. 1973 års fall används inte sällan som exempel för att påvisa HD:s motvilja att erkänna principens existens vid fastighetsköpsrelaterade frågor.Det råder inga tvivel om att formkravet fyller en allmännyttig funktion. Emellertid kan det inte anses lämpligt att formkravet ska kunna skydda den som vårdslöst medför skada för sin medkontrahent när fastighetsköpet sedan aldrig kommer till stånd. Ihärdiga påtryckningar ifrån doktrinen har lett till en utveckling i frågan. Idag ligger det närmast till hands att betrakta rättsprincipen som tillämplig vid fastighetsköp. Även om domslut som skulle styrka att så var fallet saknas så kan det konstateras att doktrinen i viss mån vunnit bifall.
Culpa in contrahendo is a general legal principle that aims to determine liability for careless (culpa) actions in negotiations (in contrahendo). This legal principle originates from German 19th-century theory and has thereafter been implemented into the Nordic juridical sphere.Further, the first suitable moment that this principle was recognized in Swedish jurisprudence was during the Supreme Court case NJA 1963 p. 105. Even though regulations according to the principle has yet to come in written law, it has been of help in several supreme court cases.NJA 1973 p. 175 became the first judicial precedent when culpa in contrahendo was tested in a real estate related matter. It is debatable whether the Supreme Court even took a stand in the question about if a careless action had occurred during negotiations and whether that action justified liability towards the counter-party or not. On the other hand, whereas the difficulties in applying the legal principle regarding a real estate matter were revealed, due to the contradicting nature of culpa in contrahendo and the form described by law considering real estate sales.The form described by law considering real estate sales aims to eliminate the risk of rushed decisions and the fundamental rule is, hence, that parties are not bound by the purchase or obliged act with loyalty between themselves until a full, legal, contract has been established and signed. On the other hand, the risk for culpa in contrahendo is exceedingly present during the negotiations. The case of 1973 is not seldom used as an example to showcase the reluctant will of the supreme court to acknowledge the bare existence of the principle in cases regarding real estate.There is no doubts, that the form described by law considering real estate purchases is of benefit to the public. However, the protective force the form obtains for someone causing economic damage to the counter-party due to carelessness is unreasonable. Persistent pressure from jurisprudence has led to some progress and development in the question. Today, it is safe to assume that the legal principle of culpa in contrahendo is applicable in matters regarding real estate, as well. Even though a supreme court precedent confirming this is lacking, the conclusion can be drawn that legal doctrine has had some assent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Adam, Jürgen. "Öffentliche Auftragsvergabe und culpa in contrahendo /." Berlin : Duncker und Humblot, 2005. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=013527700&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Nickel, Carsten. "Die Rechtsfolgen der culpa in contrahendo /." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2004. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/380999609.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Holm, Carina. "Culpa in contrahendo : ett prekontraktuellt skadeståndsansvar." Thesis, Örebro universitet, Institutionen för beteende-, social- och rättsvetenskap, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-1282.

Full text
Abstract:
Sammanfattning Denna framställning har till syfte att utreda den kontraktsrättsliga principen culpa in contrahendo, med utgångspunkt enligt följande frågeställningar; 1. Vilken innebörd har den rättsliga principen culpa in contrahendo? 2. Under vilka förutsättningar och med vilka kriterier utdömer rätten skadeståndsansvar med stöd i denna rättsprincip? 3. Vid en komparation av den kontraktuella betydelsen av culpa in contrahendo med specialreglering såsom köp av fast egendom och köprätten, kan det fastställas några likheter eller skillnader i dess lydelse eller fastställande? Culpa in contrahendo betyder vid en direkt översättning oaktsamhet vid avtalsförhandlingar och är en rättslig princip som reglerar ett prekontraktuellt skadeståndsansvar. Som framgår av det latinska namnet är det ett ansvar som inträder då part agerat oaktsamt innan slutligt avtal undertecknats. I praktiken innebär detta att part kan åläggas ansvar för kostnader som motparten haft vid förhandlingar om avtal. Denna princip är ett avsteg från huvudregeln inom avtalsrätten som gör gällande att förhandlingar sker på egen risk, dvs. vardera part står sina kostnader. Författaren kommer efter en analys fram till att förutsättningarna för att ett skadeståndsansvar enligt culpa in contrahendo skall bli aktuellt är att följande kriterier är uppfyllda; 1. culpöst agerande 2. att skadelidande haft tillit till motparten 3. att denna tillit kan påvisas genom ett konkret agerande 4. samt att tilliten kan anses vara befogad. Ett culpöst agerande enligt kontraktsrätten kunde efter en analys av praxis i vart fall konstateras vara 1) oskäligt dröjsmål samt 2) vilseledande information. Efter en analys av principen utifrån de två områdena köp av fast egendom och köprätten konstaterade författaren att culpa in contrahendo inte kan sägas ha en annan betydelse än den kontraktuella. Vad som är oaktsamt agerande i de två specialstuderade områdena kan i princip placeras direkt under något av de två kriterierna från kontraktsrätten. Författaren konstaterar vidare att kriterierna för att fastställa ansvaret inte uttryckligen enligt förarbeten eller praxis är de samma, men grunden är ändock att skadelidande haft tillit till motpartens kunskap och information.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Gebhardt, Ulrich. "Herabsetzung der Gegenleistung nach culpa in contrahendo /." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2001. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/324372574.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kakatsakis, Spyridon. "Die culpa in contrahendo nach neuem Schuldrecht /." [S.l.] : [s.n.], 2007. http://aleph.unisg.ch/hsgscan/hm00191346.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Adam, Jürgen [Verfasser]. "Öffentliche Auftragsvergabe und culpa in contrahendo. / Jürgen Adam." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2011. http://d-nb.info/1238347975/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Adolfsson, Linus. "Culpa in contrahendo : Särskilt om lojalitetsplikt och skadeståndets omfattning." Thesis, Örebro universitet, Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76225.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Machold, Saskia. "Schadenersatz nach gescheiterten Vertragsverhandlungen /." Wien : LexisNexis, 2009. http://deposit.d-nb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=3343370&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Culpa in contrahendo – Germany"

1

Die Qualifikation der culpa in contrahendo im internationalen Privatrecht. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Sachwalterhaftung. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Sabbagh-Farshi, Fariba. Die vorvertragliche Haftung im UN-Kaufrecht und in den Unidroit- und Lando-Prinzipien unter Einbeziehung des deutschen und englischen Rechts. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Eichler, Jochen. Vertragliche Dritthaftung: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit der Frage der Dritthaftung von sogenannten Experten und anderen Auskunftspersonen im Rahmen des 311 Abs. 3 BGB. Frankfurt, M: Lang, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

UN-Kaufrecht und Culpa in contrahendo. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Nickel, Carsten. Die Rechtsfolgen der culpa in contrahendo. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Culpa in contrahendo im schweizerischen Vertragsrecht. Bern: Stämpfli, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kakatsakis, Spyridon. Die culpa in contrahendo nach neuem Schuldrecht. Tübingen: Köhler-Druck, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Choe, Byoung Jo. Culpa in contrahendo bei Rudolph von Jhering. Göttingen: O. Schwartz, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Predugovorna odgovornost (culpa in contrahendo): Uporedna pravna studija. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka, Centar za pravna i politikološka istraživanja, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Culpa in contrahendo – Germany"

1

von Stetten, Wolfgang. "Culpa In Contrahendo — cic — (Haftung für Verschulden bei Vertragsanbahnung)." In Klausuren Bürgerliches Recht, 104–8. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10483-4_22.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

von Stetten, Wolfgang Freiherr. "Culpa in Contrahendo — cic — (Haftung für Verschulden Bei Vertragsanbahnung)." In Klausuren Bürgerliches Recht, 74–78. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13256-1_21.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

von Stetten, Wolfgang Freiherr. "Culpa in Contrahendo — cic — (Haftung für Verschulden bei Vertragsanbahnung)." In Klausuren Bürgerliches Recht, 101–5. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14765-7_22.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hopt, Klaus J. "Haftung der Banken bei der Finanzierung von Publikumsgesellschaften und Bauherrenmodellen Zur Grenzziehung bei § 123 Abs. 2 BGB, Einwendungsdurchgriff, culpa in contrahendo und Prospekthaftung." In Festschrift für Walter Stimpel zum 68. Geburtstag am 29. November 1985, edited by Marcus Lutter, Hans-Joachim Mertens, and Peter Ulmer, 265–94. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110893250-016.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Looschelders, Dirk. "Pre-Contractual Obligations and the Concept of Culpa in Contrahendo in German Law." In The Formation of Contract, 29–40. Nomos, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845272030-29.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

v. Bar, Christian, and Peter Mankowski. "VIII. Culpa in contrahendo." In Internationales Privatrecht Bd. II: Besonderer Teil, 410–17. Verlag C.H.BECK oHG, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/9783406746260-410.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kreutz, Giannina. "B. Die culpa in contrahendo." In Hypothetische Verträge im Rahmen des Schadensausgleichs, 18–44. Nomos, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845270111-18.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hirsch, Christoph. "§ 35 Pflichtverletzung vor Vertragsschluss (Culpa in contrahendo)." In Schuldrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 328–43. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845289397-327.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hirsch, Christoph. "§ 35 Pflichtverletzung vor Vertragsschluss (culpa in contrahendo)." In Schuldrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 345–63. Nomos, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845260129_345.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"Kapitel 1: Historische Entwicklung der culpa in contrahendo." In Die culpa in contrahendo im deutschen und brasilianischen Recht, 10–112. De Gruyter, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110592252-004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Culpa in contrahendo – Germany' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography