Academic literature on the topic 'D 3.5 UL 2008 N134'

590 Background: CMF (C 600 mg/m2, M 40 mg/m2, F 600 mg/m2) is an option for adjuvant therapy for patients with low risk early stage breast cancer. DD regimens as predicted by mathematical models of cancer growth and treatment response are superior. We previously demonstrated the safety of DD EC (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide) followed by paclitaxel at 10–11 day (d) intervals. We investigated the feasibility of administering DD adjuvant CMF every 14 d and then every 10–11 d in a 2-stage phase II trial. Methods: An initial cohort (A) was treated q 14 d with PEG-filgrastim (Neulasta) support. A second cohort (B) was treated every 10–11 d with filgrastim/Neupogen x 5 d and then, based on feasibility, modified (cohort C) to use 7 d filgrastim. The primary end point was feasibility defined as having ANC > 1.5 x 103/uL on day 1 of planned treatment for all 8 cycles with no grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity. All three cohorts were tested using a Simon's two-stage optimal design with type I and type II errors set at 10%. This design would effectively discriminate between true tolerability (as protocol-defined) rates of< 60% and> 80%. Cohort A: 38 pts with early stage breast cancer were accrued from 3/2008 though 6/2008. Cohort B: 7 pts were accrued from June 2008 through August 2008. Cohort C: Is still open with 16 pts accrued from August 2008 through December 5, 2008. Results: Median age 51: range 38 to 78. Cohort A: 29/38 pts completed 8 cycles of CMF. The regimen was considered feasible. 2 other pts completed 7 cycles and were withdrawn for depression and grade 2 transaminitis. The 7 other pts completed between 1 and 6 cycles of CMF were withdrawn as follows: 3 personal, 1 (grade 3) bone pain, 2 allergy unrelated to CMF, and 1 seizure. Cohort B: 7 pts were accrued. 6 out of 7 pts could not complete 8 cycles of chemotherapy secondary to neutropenia and 1 secondary to grade 3 ALT elevation. Cohort C: Accrual has not been completed. 16 pts are currently enrolled. Conclusions: Dose dense adjuvant CMF is feasible at 14 d intervals with PEG-filgrastim support. Adjuvant CMF every 10–11 days with filgrastim given for 5 days beginning day 2 is not feasible. Accrual is ongoing for CMF at 10–11 days with filgrastim x 7 days. Updated results will be available for Cohort C. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Hematopoietic stem cell release is regulated by the sympathetic nervous system through the β (3) adrenergic receptor [Mendez-Ferrer et al. Nature 2008]. Peripheral sympathetic nerve neurons express the G-CSF receptor and stimulation of peripheral sympathetic nerve neurons with G-CSF reduced norepinephrine (NE) reuptake significantly, suggesting that G-CSF potentiates the sympathetic tone by increasing NE availability [Lucas et al Blood 2012]. Based on preclinical data, we investigated the NE reuptake inhibitor desipramine in HSC mobilization. Despite augmentation with Plerixafor (CXCR4 inhibitor), 20% of all patients fail to mobilize 6*10^6 CD34 cells/kg in myeloma and the collection rate with G-CSF alone is 51.1% [Diperiso et al Blood 2012]. The cost of upfront plerixafor is $9,081 per patient while desipramine costs $40. We undertook a feasibility study of adult patients with MM undergoing autologous transplantation (ASCT) to study safety and efficacy of mobilization with desipramine and G-CSF. Patients & Methods: From 2013- 2014, 10 patients between the ages of 18-70, eligible for ASCT were enrolled. Desipramine 100mg daily was administered for 7 days, starting 4 days prior to starting G-CSF (D-3) and continue along with G-CSF for a total of 7 days. CBC and CD34 counts were determined on Day+5. If CD34 counts were > 10/ul, stem cell collection was commenced and if < 10/ul, plerixafor was added as salvage therapy. The endpoints were safety and efficacy in mobilizing CD34 cells for ASCT in patients with multiple myeloma. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01899326. Results Six of ten patients enrolled completed the protocol and underwent stem cell transplantation. Reasons for not completing were 1. Lack of insurance coverage 2. Non-compliance with study treatment 3. Disease relapse prior to ASCT. Five patients did not have any grade 3 or 4 adverse events and 1 had disease-related Grade 4 hypercalcemia and Grade 2 AKI at the time of stem cell mobilization. No patients had significant treatment related adverse effects. All 6 patients who completed the protocol achieved the target collection of 5*10^6 CD34 cells/kg. Four patients achieved 6*10^6 CD34 cells/kg or more and the remaining 2 patients achieved 5.52 and 5.92 *10^6 CD34 cells/kg respectively. Among the 6 patients, 2 patients received salvage plerixafor. The median time to achieve WBC >1000/ul, ANC >500/ul and platelets>20k was 11.5, 11, 13.5 days Table 1. Age Ind. Regimne Disease status P PB CD34/ul CD34 collected *10^6 / kg Total CD34/kg collected Engraftment (Days to) Adverse effects from desipramine D1 D2 D3 D4 D2 D3 D4 ANC >0.5 Platelets> 20k G1,G2 G3,G4 1 62 Free λ VRD VGPR N 45.8 66.0 7.01 7.01 12 13 none none 2 50 Free λ VRD VGPR N 88.0 143.5 12.22 12.22 12 12 none none 3 58 IgA VCD VGPR N 38.0 67.7 31.6 4.22 2.75 6.97 13 17 none none 4 70 IgAκ VRD VGPR Y 2.40 40.2 16.6 4.31 1.61 5.92 12 14 none none 5 56 IgGκ VCD VGPR Y 8.70 11.9 37.1 19.4 1.33 4.57 1.61 7.51 11 12 none none 6 70 IgGλ VD RD Relapse N 76.2 97.1 5.54 5.54 11 20 AKI hypercalcemia P-Plerixafor; V-Velcade; R-Lenalidomide; D-Dexamethasone; C-Cyclophosphamide Conclusions Overall G-CSF + Desipramine combination appears to be safe, well tolerated and shows signs of efficacy. G-CSF and desipramine was successful in 4/6 (66%) and all achieved the stem cell collection in 2 days or less. Desipramine, GCSF and Plerixafor was successful in all (6/6) patients to achieve a target of 5*10^6 CD34 cells/kg. The mean number of CD34 cells collected in the desipramine+ G-CSF mobilisers was 7.24*10^6 CD34 cells/kg which, based on historical data, is higher than what would be expected with G-CSF alone even though 3/4 of these patients had lenalidomide as induction therapy. Based on these results, a phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy of G-CSF with desipramine with or without salvage plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma will be initiated. Disclosures Barta: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2065 Poster Board II-42 Background: Hypomethylating agents have significant clinical activity in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and AML. In AML, we recently demonstrated a novel epigenetic mechanism of action for the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Liu, Blood 2008). Bortezomib induced hypomethylation of leukemic cells in vitro and in vivo via depletion of the Sp1/NF-kB transcriptional activation complex on the DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) gene promoter, which results in down-regulation of DNMT1 mRNA and enzyme, DNA hypomethylation and re-expression of otherwise hypermethylated target genes. Based on this preclinical work, we designed a phase I dose escalation study of 5-azacytidine (AZA) in combination with bortezomib in AML. Methods: Adults with relapsed or refractory AML by WHO criteria and preserved organ function with ECOG ≤2 were eligible. Previous decitabine or AZA was permitted. Patients received AZA at 75mg/m2 IV daily for days (d) 1-7. Bortezomib was gradually dose escalated–dose level 1 (DL 1): 0.7mg/m2 by IV push given immediately after AZA on d 2 and 5; DL 2: 0.7mg/m2 on d 2, 5, 9, and 12; DL 3: 1.0mg/m2 on d 2, 5, 9, and 12; and DL 4: 1.3mg/m2 on d 2, 5, 9, and 12. Cycles were repeated every 28 d, regardless of count recovery or response at least until 3 cycles were administered. Responses were graded by International Working Group criteria for AML (Cheson, JCO 2003). Bortezomib was discontinued after 3 cycles if no objective response of complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), or partial remission (PR) was achieved, but AZA could be continued beyond this timepoint in the absence of disease progression. For responding patients, 12 or more cycles of therapy were permitted. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were assigned for cycle 1 of therapy. Given the high likelihood of infection in this population regardless of therapy, infection was not considered a DLT. Six additional patients were treated at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Results: 23 patients were enrolled with a median age of 65 years (range, 42-81) and had received a median of 2 prior inductions (range, 1-5). Median presenting WBC was 3,700/uL (500-59,100/uL); median BM blast was 26% (2-93%). 14 patients were refractory to last therapy received, including 4 with primary refractory AML. 9 patients had relapsed disease; all but 2 of these had prior CR duration <1 year. Patients received a median of 2 cycles of study therapy (range, 1-12+ cycles). Dose escalation was halted once the target bortezomib dose was reached; the RP2D was AZA at 75mg/m2 d 1-7 plus bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 d, 2, 5, 9, 12. Though no toxicities were considered to be DLT in this study, infection and/or febrile neutropenia were universal. Death within 8 weeks occurred in 5 patients (22%) due to pneumonia (1), sepsis (1), or progressive disease (3). Two patients had discontinuation of bortezomib after 2 cycles due to Grade 3 neuropathy; only 1 patient received bortezomib beyond 3 cycles. In 3 patients without objective response (and with no progression), AZA alone was continued after 3 cycles of combination therapy; each reported a subjective improvement in fatigue without bortezomib. Overall, the objective response rate was 26% (6/23). Responses were as follows: 3- CR, 2- CRi, and 1-PR. One CRi patient (in cytogenetic remission also) who discontinued study treatment after 2 cycles due to unrelated trauma subsequently had complete count recovery, but a repeat marrow examination was not performed. Three patients went on to allogeneic transplantation due to response achieved. Response followed the typical pattern of azanucleoside activity, requiring more than one cycle of therapy; the median number of cycles to initial response was 2 (range, 1-5). 5/6 responders had response to combination therapy; one patient responded following 5 cycles of treatment, the last 2 cycles with AZA as a single agent. Conclusions: The combination of 5-azacytidine and bortezomib is well tolerated and active in this cohort of relapsed or refractory AML patients. Additional studies to further elucidate the role of proteasome inhibition as a mediator of hypomethylating activity in AML are warranted. Correlatives studies are ongoing. Disclosures: Blum: Celgene: Research Funding.

Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) from an HLA-matched sibling donor is the only known curative therapy in patients with high-risk SCD (Talano/Cairo, EJH, 2015). Unfortunately only about 15% of high risk patients with SCD have an HLA-matched unaffected sibling donor. T cell depletion has been employed to reduce AGVHD e.g., CD3/CD19 cell depletion (Barfiled RC, et al, Cytotherapy, 2004), αβ T-cell/CD19 cell depletion (Locatelli F, et al, Blood, 2017), CD34+ positive selection (Aversa F, et al, NEJM, 1998). MUD transplantation in high-risk SCD recipients has shown unexpectedly high rates of CGVHD (Shenoy et al, Blood, 2016). We reported a very low incidence of acute and chronic GVHD in pediatric recipients receiving CD34 enriched HPC products with PB MNC addback with 2 x 105 CD3/kg from MUD donors (Geyer/Cairo et al, BJH, 2012). Furthermore, rapid NK cell reconstitution after AlloSCT is associated with a significant improvement in 1yr OS (Pical-Izard, BBMT, 2015; Dunbar et al, Hematologica, 2008). Recently, we reported promising results for high-risk SCD patients at 1 year follow-up after FHI CD34 enriched/PBMNC with addback AlloSCT with the probability of 1-year overall survival (OS) n=17; 88.2% (CI95: 60.6-96.9) (Talano/Cairo, ASH, 2017), expanding the donor pool and hopefully improving outcomes for high-risk patients with SCD. Objective: To investigate donor chimerism, immune cell reconstitution and NK cell function in high-risk patients with SCD following AlloSCT using FHI CD34 enrichment/PBMNC (2 x 105 CD3/kg) addback. Methods: Twenty-one eligible SCD patients (2-<21 yrs) were enrolled. Nineteen patients received hydroxyurea, azathioprine, fludarabine, busulfan, thiotepa, cyclophosphamide, R-ATG, and TLI followed by FHI AlloSCT to date (Talano/Cairo, ASH, 2017). CD34 cells were enriched using the CliniMACS® system, kindly provided by Miltenyi Biotec, with a target dose of 10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg with a PBMNC addback dose of 2x10*5 CD3/kg in the final product. Whole blood and RBC chimerism (estimated using CD71 to isolate an eythroid lineage-enriched fraction) were determined by STR. Immune cell and subset reconstitution was assessed by flow cytometry as previously described (Geyer/Cairo et al. BJH, 2012). NK function was determined by cytotoxic activity against K562 tumor targets at 10:1 E:T ratio by europium release assay and intracellular LAMP-1 (CD107a) and granzyme B expression by flow cytometry as previously described (Chu/Cairo et al, Can Imm Res, 2015). Results: There was 100% engraftment of neutrophils and platelets. The median day post-HISCT to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was +9 and +19, respectively. Whole blood donor chimerism (mean±SEM) at 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year post-HISCT was 97±1%, 97±1%, 97±1%, respectively (Fig.1). Donor chimerism for CD71+ RBCs (mean±SEM) at 1-year, 2-year, 3-year post-HISCT was 97±2%, 98±1%, 98±1%, respectively (Fig.1). Immune reconstitution of CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD19 was evaluated. The time to recovery of minimally normal levels post-HISCT of CD3 (800 cells/ul), CD4 (400 cells/ul), CD8 (200 cells/ul), and CD19 (200 cells/ul), was approximately 365, 365, 270, and 60 days post-HISCT (Fig.2), respectively. Probability of Grade II-IV AGVHD, CGVHD and 1 year EFS/OS was 6.2%, 6.7% and 90%, respectively. NK reconstitution was rapid and peaked at d+30 (36±9%, 2710cells/ml). NK cytotoxicity against K562 at a E:T=10:1 peaked at d+30 (26±3%) and d+180 (28±3%) vs at pre-t (16±2%) (p<0.01) (Fig. 3A). Consistent with increased NK cytotoxicity, CD56dimCD3- subset was increased at d+30 vs pre- HISCT (p<0.05). The NK activation marker, CD107a peaked at d+30 (38±9%) and d+180 (41±6%) (Fig.3B). More over, reconstituted NK cells expressed higher level of activating receptors NKp46 (24±9%), NKG2D (32±9%) and KIR2DS (8±3%) and inhibitory receptors NKG2A (33±9%), CD94 (28±9%) and KIR2DL2/3 (11±2%) at d+30 compared to other time points. Conclusion: Despite a 5 log depletion of T cells, the PBMNC addback (fixed at 2 x 105 CD3/kg) facilitated rapid donor chimerism and immune reconstitution with a low probability of Grade II-IV AGVHD. The rapid NK reconstitution may have in part contributed to the excellent 1yr OS in the FHI study. (Supported by FDA R01FD004090 (MSC)). Disclosures Cairo: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Osuka: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Other: MTA.

Abstract Introduction Ruxolitinib is a selective JAK 1/2 inhibitor, which shows an excellent treatment outcome in myelofibrosis (MF) patients. Main side effect of JAK 1/2 inhibitors is an increased risk of infection. JAK1/2 inhibition may interfere with the differentiation of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) producing Th1 cells and IFN-γ is a key cytokine involved in protective immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis(TB). During COMPORT-II trial, a case of disseminated TB with ruxolitinib was reported. Here, we analyze the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in Korean MF patients and report cases of TB lymphadenitis during the treatment. Methods Forty-nine patients diagnosed with PMF, PPV-MF or PET-MF have been enrolled and at this time twenty patients are evaluable (median age; 63 years, 37-80). Starting dose of ruxolitinib was determined based on each patient’s baseline platelet count (20 mg bid/d for a baseline platelet more than 200,000/µL, 15 mg bid/d for 100,000-200,000/uL). To determine the efficacy of ruxolitinib, we serially assessed the spleen size by palpation, myelofibrosis symptom assessment using MFSAF and BM examination with JAK2V617Fmutation allele burden. Among 20 evaluable patients, 16 assessed IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs, quantiFERON-TB Gold test) before starting ruxolitinib. Results Of total twenty patients, 12 (60.0%), 3 (15.0%) and 5 (25.0%) were PMF, PPV-MF and PET-MF, respectively. By DIPSS, 13 (65.0%) was Int-2 risk, 3 (15.0%) and 4 (20.0%) were Int-1 and high risk. Eleven patients started with 20 mg bid/d (median baseline platelet: 302,000/uL, 206,000-814,000) and nine were 15 mg bid/d (median; 139,000/uL, 100,000-194,000). Median baseline total symptom score (TSS) was 12 (1-36) and palpable spleen length was 19 cm (1-30). JAK2V617Fmutation was positive in 13 (65.0%) patients (median allele burden; 87.1%, 26.2-93.7). Median time of ruxolitinib exposure was 2.0 ms. (0.8-6.2). Two patients increased TSS following ruxolitinib treatment, however, median maximal reduction in TSS was above 90.9% (27.8-100) and 64.7% of patients showed more than 50% reduction of TSS with ruxolitinib. In an aspect of spleen length, all except two patients showed decreased palpable spleen length. Median maximal reduction in spleen length was 70.2% (0-100) and 72.2% of patients showed more than 35% reduction in spleen length with ruxolitinib. Three patients (15.0%) experienced gr. 3/4 thrombocytopenia and one (5.0%) gr. 3 neutropenia. Among patients who assessed pre-treatment IGRAs, only one revealed positive IGRAs. Since there was no evidence of active TB in symptom and radiologic examination, he was diagnosed as latent TB infection (LTBI) and started 9 ms.-isoniazid (INH) treatment. He had a huge hepatosplenomegaly combined with large amount of ascites which needed frequent paracentesis, hence, we started ruxolitinib with INH treatment. He showed no evidence of active TB and achieved negative IGRAs result on 5 ms. of ruxolitinib treatment. On 1 m. and 5 ms. of ruxolirinib treatment, two patients developed pyrexia and neck masses which were diagnosed as TB lymphadenitis. All of them had no previous history of TB and showed negative results in pre-treatment IGRAs and radiologic examinations. First patient discontinued ruxolitinib by herself and eventually died of MF progression 2 ms. later. Second patient continued ruxolitinib treatment with TB medication and there was no evidence of active TB or MF progression on 5 ms. of ruxolitinib treatment. Conclusions Ruxolitinib was generally well tolerated and showed an excellent treatment outcome in Korean MF patients. By 2008 WHO report, intermediate burden of TB cases exist in Korea, hence, TB is still endemic in Korea. According to 2011 Korean Guidelines for TB, LTBI should be treated in patients receiving immunosupressive agents including TNF-α inhibitors. Although further prospective investigations on the incidence of TB with JAK 1/2 inhibitors in TB endemic countries are warranted, it seems to be reasonable to check the possibility of LTBI before starting JAK 1/2 inhibitors. LTBI confirmed patients receiving JAK 1/2 inhibitors may be deemed a high risk of active TB and consider LTBI treatment. Furthermore, it is necessary to use a caution for active TB infection during the treatment of JAK 1/2 inhibitors in such countries. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2234 Introduction/Background: Immunosuppressive therapy is the best alternative for patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) without matched sibling donor or with age > 40 years. Since 1988, an alternative protocol was developed with cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone (PRED) due to irregularity in distribution of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in Brazil. This study aims to show the results of this treatment on the quality of response, overall survival and development of clonal evolution. Materials and methods: 384 patients diagnosed with SAA (Camitta and Bacigalupo criteria) were evaluable by medical records review from 12/1988 to 12/2008. The immunosuppressive therapy consisted of CSA: 12mg/kg/day BID from day (D)1- D8, then 7mg/kg/day BID until 1 year. After that CSA was progressively tapered (5% each month) and ultimately stopped usually by two years. CSA levels were kept between 200–400ng/ml. PRED: 2mg/kg/day from D1-D14 then 1mg/kg/day from D15- D45. From that day on PRED dose was tapered 20% each week. Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and fluconazole were used for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jiroveci (P carinni) and fungal diseases, respectively. Treatment response was defined as Table 1. Treatment evaluation was performed at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months and then yearly. At diagnosis: median age was 21 years (2-75), disease duration 95 days (2-4749), and median number of transfusions were 12 (0-200). Etiology was idiopathic in 78%. In peripheral blood, median hemoglobin was 7.4g/dL, granulocytes 580/uL, platelets 12.000/uL and reticulocyte 0.5% (corrected value). 60% of the patients had not been treated previously. Results: Overall survival was 61% ± 3 with a median follow-up of 7 years (range: 2 months - 23 years). Response to treatment: 51% had some degree of response, with good quality of life and transfusions independent (143 patients with complete response and 53 partial response). 36 patients had no response and there were 96 deaths. Fifty six patients have lost follow-up. Most patients achieved response between 3 and 6 months of therapy. In multivariate analysis the number of neutrophils ≥ 200/uL (p = 0.009), platelets ≥ 12.000/uL (p = 0.018), reticulocyte ≥ 0.5% (p <0.001) and starting treatment after 1997 (p = 0.002) had an impact on overall survival. Patients with 15 or more previous transfusions (p = 0.006) and age ≥ 40 years (p = 0.003) had lower survival. Overall survival was 63% ± 4 and 42% ± 6 for for patients with severe disease and very severe aplastic anemia (p <0.001). The subgroup analysis of patients under 10 years old had similar results. Among patients with response, thirty-four remained dependent of CSA. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 28% ± 4 within a median of 4.4 years. Hypertension, gingival hypertrophy and diabetes mellitus were common, but easily controlled. The rate of clonal evolution among this cohort was 7.81% (16 patients developed Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria, 9 Myelodysplastic Syndrome and 5 Acute Myeloid Leukemia). Conclusion: This study, with a long follow-up, has demonstrated that the overall survival using CSA and PRED is similar to that reported with ATG therapy. Even patients with partial responses had achieved good quality of life, free from transfusions and infections. Survival was influenced by the neutrophils, platelet counts, reticulocyte, number of transfusions, age at diagnosis, and therapy started after 1997. The incidence of clonal evolution was lower when compared to reported trials with ATG + CSA. Disclosures: Oliveira: Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Funke: Novartis, Bristol: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Pasquini: Novartis, Bristol: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Abstract 3293 Background: The hypomethylating agent decitabine has significant activity in AML. We previously demonstrated a novel epigenetic mechanism of action for the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in AML cells (Liu, Blood 2008). Bortezomib induced hypomethylation of leukemic cells in vitro and in vivo via disruption of the Sp1/NF-kB transcriptional activation complex on the DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) gene promoter, which resulted in down-regulation of DNMT1 mRNA and protein levels, DNA hypomethylation, and re-expression of otherwise hypermethylated target genes. Based on this, we designed a phase 1 dose escalation trial of decitabine in combination with bortezomib. Methods: Adults with high risk AML who had preserved organ function and ECOG ≤2 were eligible. High risk AML included relapsed/refractory AML or age>60 years with previously untreated disease (if ineligible for or refused standard induction therapy). Patients received decitabine at 20mg/m2 IV daily for days (d) 1–10 of 28 d cycles with dose modification in subsequent cycles based on response and myelosuppression. Bortezomib (given immediately after decitabine) was gradually dose escalated in standard 3+3 fashion from 0.7mg/m2 on d 5 and 8 to the target dose of 1.3mg/m2 on d 5, 8, 12, and 15. Cycles were repeated every 28 d, regardless of count recovery. The plan was to administer 3 cycles if possible before discontinuation due to lack of response. For responding pts, therapy was continued indefinitely. Six additional pts were treated at the recommended phase 2 dose. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were assigned for cycle 1 of therapy. Given the high likelihood of infection in this population regardless of therapy, infection was not considered a DLT unless toxicity exceeded that expected with conventional therapy. Results: 19 pts were enrolled with a median age of 69 years (range, 32–83). 12 pts were age>70. 10 pts were previously untreated. Median presenting WBC count was 3,900/uL (range, 1,300-69,200/uL); median bone marrow blast was 34%. Patients received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range, 1–14 cycles). Two pts received combination therapy beyond 3 cycles of treatment; one received combination for 8 cycles, then decitabine alone for 6 additional cycles, and the other received combination for 4 cycles, then decitabine alone for 6 additional cycles. Dose escalation was halted once the target bortezomib dose was reached; the MTD was decitabine at 20mg/m2 d 1–10 plus bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 d 5, 8, 12, and 15. One DLT of death due to sepsis occurred in dose level 3. Febrile neutropenia and infectious complications were frequent. Death within 8 weeks occurred in 4 pts (21%). Neuropathy attributable to bortezomib, though not meeting DLT criteria, was problematic with repetitive cycles of administration. Specifically, two pts had Grade 3 neuropathy requiring discontinuation of treatment. Responses occurred in 4/10 previously untreated pts: 3 had complete remission (CR) and one had CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). One 84 year old pt with complex karyotype discontinued therapy after one cycle due to fatigue with persistent disease (non-responder). Notably, the pt subsequently had complete count recovery and lived for 14 months with no additional treatment, refusing further marrow evaluation of response. Response durations for the 3 CR were as follows: 12 months, 9 months, and the last patient died in CR after 10 months response duration due to unrelated and preexisting cardiac disease. The CRi lasted 3 months before relapse. Responses occurred in 2/9 relapsed/refractory pts. Both had CRi. Response duration for one patient was only 2 months. The other had allogeneic transplant in first remission 22 months ago before recently expiring in remission with transplant-related complications. In 3/6 responders with abnormal karyotype, two achieved cytogenetic CR. Conclusions: The combination of decitabine and bortezomib was reasonably well tolerated and active in high risk AML. Neuropathy beyond cycle 1 limited prolonged exposure to both agents. Given recent data suggesting equivalent efficacy with weekly dosing of bortezomib in multidrug treatments for myeloma, modification of the bortezomib schedule may facilitate more prolonged exposure to the combination. A phase 2 study of this combination is being planned, with bortezomib modification as noted. Correlative studies are ongoing. NCI U01 CA 76576, NIH/NCI K23CA120708. Disclosures: Blum: Celgene: Research Funding. Off Label Use: decitabine and bortezomib in AML.

Abstract Introduction Non-Hodgkin lymphoma responds to single agents such as cyclophosphamide, combination therapy such as CVP and immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for relapsed low grade or mantle cell lymphoma. Based on the success and tolerability of combining alkylating agents with proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma, a phase II clinical trial of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (R-CyBor-D) was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of this combination in relapsed low grade and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Methods This trial enrolled relapsed patients at Mayo Clinic from October 2008 to March 2014. Eligibility required age≥18; biopsy proven follicular grades 1 or 2 lymphoma (FL), MCL, small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia, marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, or Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM); life expectancy >3 months; ECOG PS 0, 1 or 2; measurable disease; Hb ≥8g/dl, ANC ≥1200/uL, platelet ≥75,000/uL, creatinine ≤1.5xULN, total bilirubin ≤1.5xULN, alkaline phosphatase ≤3xULN, AST ≤3xULN; and willingness to sign informed consent. Women of child bearing potential had pregnancy testing and all patients followed recommendations for contraception. Treatment included rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and oral cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2, IV bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, and oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued two cycles beyond best response or a maximum of 12 cycles. Allopurinol 300 mg on days 0-14 for the first cycle was strongly recommended. Results 21 patients were enrolled prior to study closure due to slow accrual. Bortezomib was initially given on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in the first 16 patients, but was subsequently modified to days 1, 8, 15, and 22 due to significant peripheral neuropathy (PN). Median age was 69 years (range 51-80) and 13 (62%) were male. 62% had stage IV disease and 17 (81%) had 2 or more prior treatments with 3 (14%) having prior autologous stem cell transplantation. Histologies included FL-I (n=6), FL-II (n=2), MCL (n=8), and WM (n=5). Patients completed a median of 4 cycles of treatment (range 1-12), discontinuing due to 9 (43%) completion per protocol, 4 (19%) progression, 5 (24%) adverse events, 1 (5%) patient refusal, and 2 (10%) other reasons. Median follow-up is 32.8 months (0.9-54.8). CR or PR as best response was observed in 13 (62%, 95% CI 38-82%; 4 CR [19%], 9 PR [43%]) patients. By histology, CR or PR was observed in 7 (88%) FL patients (4 CR, 3 PR); 2 (25%) MCL patients (both PR), and 4 (80%) WM patients (all PR). CR or PR was observed in 10/16 (62%; 4 CR, 6 PR) before and 3/5 (60%; all PR) after the change in bortezomib schedule. Among 13 patients with CR or PR, median duration of response was 25.9 months (95% CI 8.0-not reached). Median PFS and OS were 11.6 months (95% CI 3.8-not reached) and 54.8 months (95% CI 24.6-54.8), respectively. At least one Gr≥3 adverse event at least possible related was observed in 14 (67%) patients, the most common being leucopenia (7, 33%), neutropenia (7, 33%), thrombocytopenia (6, 29%), anemia (5, 24%), PN (5, 24%), and fatigue (3, 14%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy at least possibly related was Gr1, Gr2, and Gr3 in 5 (24%) patients each, with a lower rate observed for patients after the change in bortezomib schedule (before 13/16 [81%] Gr≥1, after 2/5 [40%] Gr≥1). Among 14 patients who completed a baseline and at least one post-baseline FACT/GOG-NTX additional concerns questionnaire, 10 (71%) reported clinically meaningful (≥3-point) worsening in patient-reported neurotoxicity (8/11 [73%] before and 2/3 [67%] after the change in bortezomib schedule). Conclusions Our results suggest R-CyBor-D is a safe and effective combination in patients with relapsed low grade and mantle cell lymphomas. High response rates were seen in FL and WM. The majority of significant AE’s were hematologic. However, sensory neuropathy was common with twice weekly dosing of bortezomib and lessened with weekly dosing. Determination of optimal treatment regimens in this population remains an unmet need. Additional clinical trials including larger patient numbers are necessary to confirm these observations. This trial was sponsored by Millennium Disclosures Off Label Use: bortezomib was used in combination therapy to treat relapsed low grade lymphomas and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Bergsagel:Novartis: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; OncoEthix: Research Funding; MundiPharma: Research Funding. Tiedemann:Janssen: Honoraria. Reeder:Millennium, Celgene, Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 4443 Introduction: Various chemotherapeutic agents particularly cyclophosphamide (CY) are utilized in combination with growth factors in an attempt to increase the number of stem cells available for collection in the peripheral blood. Plerixafor (P) is a reversible antagonist of CXCR4 and interrupts its interaction with SDF-1. This results in a rapid release of hematopoietic stem cells from the marrow to the circulation. Recent pivotal phase III trial data has established the efficacy of P in combination with G-CSF (G) in patients who had failed prior attempts at stem cell collection. However, there is limited data about the utility of plerixafor in patients who are being mobilized with chemotherapy and G. Method: In this single institution study of uniformly treated patients we describe our experience with the use of P as a salvage option in patients who fail to optimally mobilize CD34+ cells (>5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg). Patients received CY (3-4 g/m2) followed by GCSF (10 mcg/kg) from day 1 to day 10. Thirteen patients (6 NHL, 4 MM, 2 Hodgkin lymphoma, 1 Ewings sarcoma) received salvage P from 2008–2010. Their outcomes were compared with 10 matched, historic controls mobilized with (CY n=8; CY + etoposide n=1; CY + topotecan n=1) plus G-CSF (10mcg/kg/d) identified from our institutional database. Data was collected on mobilization and transplant outcomes and analyzed utilizing SPSS version 13.0. Patients receiving P were closely matched to historic controls (CY+G). Result: Both groups were similar with regards to age, gender, disease type, prior therapies and performance status (p>0.05 for all). Patients in the P arm received a median of 2.5 doses (range 1–8). The mean CD34+ count was 21.5cells/ul in the P arm and 32.5 cells/ul in the CY+G arm (p=0.2). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the average number of apheresis sessions in the P vs. CY+G arms (4.2 vs. 4.4, p=0.8) or the total number of CD34+ stem cells collected (4.0×106/kg vs. 3.9×106/kg, p=0.9). However, 7 out of the 13 patients who received P did have an increase of >10 CD34+ cells/ul in their peripheral blood. Utilizing a cut-off of 5×106 CD34+/kg, 3 (23%) patients in the P arm and 3 (30%) patients in the CY+G arm had a successful harvest. Three NHL patients required >4 doses of P, but all eventually collected >2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment dynamics were similar in both groups of patients. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days for both groups, p=0.8, and to platelet engraftment was 22 days vs. 20.5 days, p=0.1, respectively for P vs. CY+G. Conclusion: Our limited single-center retrospective case-controlled outcomes data, suggests that when compared with CY+G, the addition of P as a salvage agent does not significantly improve mobilization outcomes. Further evaluation is needed to combine P with CY+G in terms of optimal timing and potentially dosing of chemotherapy agents utilized. We suggest that the combination P+G would provide better potential outcomes such as improved collection and less hospitalization and reduce the use of chemo-mobilization prior to an Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

I ntroduction : Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) often presents as hemolysis and/or bone marrow failure. Flow cytometric testing can accurately detect PNH. However, the long term studies on PNH clone size and how it relates to clinical course are few. We sought to understand how PNH clone size correlates with clinical course over time and the impacts on clone size with different treatments. Here we report long term clone size monitoring and clinical data of 57 patients with PNH in a single intuition. Methods : High sensitivity PNH flow cytometry (0.01% limit of detection) was performed with FLAER-FITC, CD64-PE, CD14-ECD, CD15-PC5, CD24-AA7500, CD45-KO for neutrophils & monocytes; CD59-PE and CD235a-AA750 for RBCs. Retrospective analysis was done in the positive PNH cases from 2008-2019 at OHSU. Total 173 cases for 57 patients; including 27 females and 30 males, 52 adults and 5 pediatrics, with a mean age of 45 (range 9-78). We also reviewed results of serum LDH, bone marrow biopsies and molecular/cytogenetics of these patients. Among of these patients, 18 patients (11 females and 7 males, mean age 49.33, age range 29-73) with long term (at least over 4 years) follow-up have more than 3 PNH tests. Besides PNH clone on RBC and PMN, we also reviewed results of WBC count (x103/ul), Hb (g/dL), PLT (x103/ul) serum LDH (U/L), bone marrow biopsy reports and molecular/cytogenetics findings in these patients. Results: Among 57 patients, there are 30 aplastic anemia (AA) patients (53.63%), 7 AA patients progressing to PNH (AA&PNH, 12.28%), 5 myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS, 8.77%), 12 PNH patients (21.05%), 1 pancytopenia, 1 autoimmune disease, 1 thrombosis. The diagnosis of AA and MDS were confirmed by bone marrow biopsy and molecular/cytogenetics. Significantly higher levels of all PNH clones were observed in PNH and AA/ PNH, compared to AA (all P &lt;0.001) and MDS (all P&lt;0.05) shown in Figure A-D. LDH was higher in PNH and AA/PNH than AA and MDS groups (P&lt;0.001, Figure E). LDH demonstrated positive correlation with PNH clone size in RBC-type-III, neutrophils and monocytes (all P&lt;0.0001, R= 0.4447, 0.5469, 0.5711, respectively, Figure F). No correlation was observed between LDH and RBC-type-II. Long term (4-11 years ) follow up include 18 patients were divided into 4 groups: 5 AA treated with immunosuppressant only, 5 AA treated with immunosuppressants and/or eltrombopag, 5 classic PNH or AA that progressed to PNH treated with immunosuppressants and/or eculizumab, and 3 PNH with observation and supplements only. The study showed immunosuppression only has lowest PNH clone size for both RBC and WBC (Figure G-H). As for the Hb and WBC count, there were no statistics differences among 4 groups (Figure I-J). Decreased PLT was detected in eltrombopag group (Figure K). Significantly, increased LDH was observed in the observation/supplement group (Figure L). Interestingly, all these 3 patients without special treatment have high PNH clones and LDH from diagnosis to now over 10 years. Despite receiving basic supportive care, the patients' clinical courses have been stable with only supplementation of vitamin B12 and Folic Acid. Conclusions : Positive PNH test was most frequently seen in AA patients. AA has lower PNH clone size and LDH than those of PNH patients or AA progressed to PNH patients. For all patients, PNH population showed positive correlation with LDH. Our study suggest that it is necessary to follow PNH clone size, as this may impact the decision of when to start therapy with what agents. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.