To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: De sophisticis elenchis (Aristotle).

Books on the topic 'De sophisticis elenchis (Aristotle)'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 15 books for your research on the topic 'De sophisticis elenchis (Aristotle).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Aristotle. Les réfutations sophistiques. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Aristóteles. Aristotle on fallacies, or, The Sophistici elenchi. New York: Garland, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

(Editor), B. G. Dod, ed. De Sophisticis Elenchis: Translatio Boethii, Fragmenta Translationis Iacobi, Et Recensio Guilleimi De Moerbeka (Aristoteles Latinus , No 1-3). Brill Academic Pub, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Poste, Edward. Aristotle on Fallacies or the Sophistici Elenchi. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429200106.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

(Translator), Edward Poste, ed. Aristotle On Fallacies Or The Sophistici Elenchi. Kessinger Publishing, LLC, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Poste, Edward. Aristotle on Fallacies; or the Sophistici Elenchi. Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Aristóteles. Aristotle On Fallacies Or The Sophistici Elenchi. Kessinger Publishing, LLC, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Poste, Edward. Aristotle on Fallacies; or the Sophistici Elenchi. Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Aristotle on Fallacies; or the Sophistici Elenchi. Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Aristotle on Fallacies; or the Sophistici Elenchi. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Wallies, Maximilian. Alexandri Quod Fertur in Aristotelis Sophisticos Elenchos Commentarium. de Gruyter GmbH, Walter, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Aristoteles. Aristotle On Fallacies: Or, the Sophistici Elenchi, With a Tr. and Notes by E. Poste. Franklin Classics, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Aristoteles. Aristotle on Fallacies: Or, the Sophistici Elenchi, with a Tr. and Notes by E. Poste. Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Aristoteles. Aristotle On Fallacies: Or, the Sophistici Elenchi, With a Tr. and Notes by E. Poste. Franklin Classics, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Rossi, Gabriela. Going Through Aporiai: The Critical Use of Aristotle’s Dialectic. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805762.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper challenges a widespread reading of Aristotle’s use of dialectic in the treatment of aporiai. According to this reading, the search for a resolution of an aporia is supposed to proceed by arguing against conflicting theses to refute one of them. I argue that this reading is not satisfactory and propose an alternative, based on an often overlooked distinction between two dialectical procedures, the refutation (elenchos) of a thesis and the resolution (lusis) of an argument. These two terms are employed fairly consistently by Aristotle in the treatises as well. Since an aporia requires not merely conflicting theses, but conflicting arguments for those theses, I contend that the ideal way out of aporiai involves a critical analysis of those arguments, akin to that involved in the dialectical resolution. A relevant implication of this reading is that it expands the critical use of dialectic for philosophy, and points to the specific philosophical utility of the Sophistical Refutations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography