Books on the topic 'Defense planning based on capabilities'

United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Enabling Joint Force Capabilities. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Enabling Joint Force Capabilities. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, 2003.

Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on R & D Needs for Improving Civilian Medical Response to Chemical and Biological Terrorism Incidents. Improving civilian medical response to chemical or biological terrorist incidents: Interim report on current capabilities. National Academy Press, 1998.

H, Pendleton John, ed. Ballistic missile defense: DOD needs to address planning and implementation challenges for future capabilities in Europe : report to congressional addressees. U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 2011.

M, Martin Belva, ed. Defense acquisitions: Navy's ability to overcome challenges facing the Littoral Combat Ship will determine eventual capabilities : report to congressional requesters. U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 2010.

Office, General Accounting. Defense acquisitions: Status of strategic C4 system modernization and plans to integrate additional mission capabilities. The Office, 2000.

Office, United States Government Accountability. Force structure: Army needs to provide DOD and Congress more visibility regarding modular force capabilities and implementation plans : report to Congressional Committees. United States Government Accountability Office, 2006.

Defense, United States Congress Senate Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Conventional Forces and Alliance. Alliance and defense capabilities in Europe: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Conventional Forces and Alliance Defense of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, August 4; October 7, 20; Novemeber 3, 17, 1987. U.S. G.P.O., 1988.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services. Subcommittee on Conventional Forces and Alliance Defense. Alliance and defense capabilities in Europe: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Conventional Forces and Alliance Defense of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, August 4; October 7, 20; November 3, 17, 1987. U.S. G.P.O., 1988.

Office, General Accounting. U.S. combat air power: Reassessing plans to modernize interdiction capabilities could save billions : report to Congressional committees. GAO, 1996.

Intelligence, Emerging Threats and Capabilities United States Congress House Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on. Perspectives on the future national security environment: Technological, geopolitical, and economic trends affecting the defense strategic guidance: hearing before the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session, hearing held February 13, 2013. U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013.

Office, General Accounting. Defense acquisitions: Space-based infrared system-low at risk of missing initial deployment date : report to the Chaitman, Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives. U.S. General Accounting Office, 2001.

Office, General Accounting. Critical infrastructure protection: Significant challenges in developing national capabilities : report to the Subcommittee on Technology, Terrorism, and Government Information, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate. The Office, 2001.

Office, General Accounting. Naval aviation: The Navy is taking actions to improve the combat capabilities of its tactical aircraft : report to Congressional requesters. U.S. General Accounting Office, 1993.

Emerging Threats and Capabilities United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Subcommittee on Intelligence. Information technology and cyber operations: Modernization and policy issues to support the future force: hearing before the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session, hearing held March 13, 2013. U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013.

Office, General Accounting. Nuclear nonproliferation: U.S. efforts to help other countries combat nuclear smuggling need strengthened coordination and planning : report to the Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate. U.S. General Accounting Office, 2002.

Office, General Accounting. Military personnel: General and flag officer requirements are unclear based on DOD's 2003 report to congress : report to congressional committees. U.S. General Accounting Office, 2004.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Projection Forces Subcommittee. Hearing on National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 and oversight of previously authorized programs before the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session: Projection Forces Subcommittee hearing on Navy research and development : programs in support of the War on Terrorism, naval transportation, and future naval capabilities, hearing held March 2, 2005. U.S. G.P.O., 2006.

Naval Analytical Capabilities: Improving Capabilities-Based Planning. National Academies Press, 2005.

Naval Analytical Capabilities: Improving Capabilities-Based Planning. National Academies Press, 2005.

(US), National Research Council. Naval Analytical Capabilities: Improving Capabilities-Based Planning. National Academies Press, 2005.

Naval Analytical Capabilities: Improving Capabilities-Based Planning. National Academies Press, 2005.

Analytic Architecture for Capabilities-Based Planning, Mission-System Analysis, and Transformation. RAND Corporation, 2002.

Helfat, Constance E., Will Mitchell, David J. Teece, et al. Dynamic Capabilities Resource-Based Change in Organizations. Blackwell Publishing Limited, 2007.

Board, Naval Studies, National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, and Committee for an Assessment of Naval Forces' Defense Capabilities Against Chemical and Biological Warfare Threats. Naval Forces' Defense Capabilities Against Chemical and Biological Warfare Threats. National Academies Press, 2004.

A Capabilities-Based Strategy for Army Security Cooperation. RAND Corporation, 2007.

Davis, Paul K. Capabilities for Joint Analysis in the Department of Defense: Rethinking Support for Strategic Analysis. RAND Corporation, 2016.

Arctic capabilities: DOD addressed many specified reporting elements in its 2011 Arctic Report but should take steps to meet near-and long-term needs : report to congressional committees. U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 2012.

U.S. combat air power: Reassessing plans to modernize interdiction capabilities could save billions : report to congressional committees. The Office, 1996.

U.S. combat air power: Reassessing plans to modernize interdiction capabilities could save billions : report to congressional committees. The Office, 1996.

U.S. combat air power: Reassessing plans to modernize interdiction capabilities could save billions : report to congressional committees. The Office, 1996.

U.S. combat air power: Reassessing plans to modernize interdiction capabilities could save billions : report to congressional committees. The Office, 1996.

U.S. combat air power: Reassessing plans to modernize interdiction capabilities could save billions : report to congressional committees. The Office, 1996.

Freilich, Charles D. Israel’s Classic Defense Doctrine. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190602932.003.0002.

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle: DOD needs to ensure new acquisition strategy is based on sufficient information : report to congressional committees. U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 2011.

Defense support program: Ground station upgrades not based on validated requirements : report to the Acting Secretary of the Air Force. The Office, 1993.

Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosives consequence management: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Unconventional Threats, and Capabilities of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, hearing held July 28, 2009. U.S. G.P.O., 2010.

Hearing on National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 and oversight of previously authorized programs before the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session: Projection Forces Subcommittee hearing on Navy research and development : programs in support of the War on Terrorism, naval transportation, and future naval capabilities, hearing held March 2, 2005. U.S. G.P.O., 2006.

Financial management: NASA's financial reports are based on unreliable data : report to the Congress. The Office, 1992.

Arruzza, Cinzia. Clever Villains. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190678852.003.0007.

Pisarenko, T. V., T. K. Kvasha, T. V. Havrys, et al. Analysis of world technological trends in the military sphere. State Institution “Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information”, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.35668/978-966-479-127-1.

Steer, Cassandra, and Matthew Hersch, eds. War and Peace in Outer Space. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197548684.001.0001.

Craig, Justin B., and Ken Moores. Leading a Family Business. ABC-CLIO, LLC, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9798400677694.