To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Deleuze – Guattari.
Journal articles on the topic 'Deleuze – Guattari'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Deleuze – Guattari.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Alliez, Eric. "Der Guattari-Deleuze-Effekt." ZMK Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung 2/1/2011: Offene Objekte 2, no. 1 (2011): 55–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.28937/1000107522.
Full textAbstract:
Statt von einem Guattari-Effekt auf Deleuze muss man von einem Guattari-Deleuze-Effekt sprechen, um ein wechselseitiges Einwirken in einem gemeinsamen Projekt zu beschreiben, das mit dem Herausgehen aus der klassischen Psychoanalyse beginnt und in den Umbau der Philosophie in der Öffnung auf ihr Außen mündet. Dieser Umbau lässt das Paradigma der Interpretation ebenso hinter sich wie jenes der Struktur. In der Kritik an Lacan vollziehen Deleuze und Guattari die Abkehr vom Postulat des Primats der Sprache als Struktur und eines durch sie immer schon konstituierten und vom Realen ebenso wie von kollektiven Individuationsprozessen abgeschnittenen Subjekts. Die heterogenen Ausdrucksmaterien Hjelmslevs, die das Aufbrechen der Opposition von Sprachzeichen und Materie ermöglichen sowie die Konzepte der Wunschmaschine und mehr noch des Gefüges eröffnen den Weg hin zu einem Politisch-Werden der Philosophie als Wiederaneignung der Produktionsmittel kollektiver Subjektivität. </br></br>In order to understand the collaborators' mutual impact in a joint project that began with Deleuze and Guattari's transgression of classical psychoanalysis and advanced to their complete remodeling of philosophy, the notion of a »Guattari-Deleuze-effect« is more adequate than the presumption an unilateral »Guattari-effect« upon Deleuze. Furthermore, Deleuze's and Guattari's concerted efforts leave the paradigms of »interpretation« and »structure« behind; in their critique of Lacan, Deleuze and Guattari turn away from the primate of language as structure and the postulate of an always already constituted subject that is cut off both from the real and from collective processes of individuation. Finally, the concept of a heterogeneous »matter of expression,« which, borrowed from Hjelmslev, allows opening up the opposition between linguistic sign and matter, as well as the concepts of »desiring-machine« and »assemblage«, clear the way towards a becoming-political of philosophy, understood as reappropriation of collective subjectivity's means of production.
2
Žukauskaitė, Audronė. "SOCIALINIŲ INSTITUCIJŲ KRITIKA GILL ES’IO DELEUZE’O IR FELIXO GUATTARI FILOSOFIJOJE." Problemos 76 (January 1, 2009): 39–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/problemos.2009.0.1944.
Full textAbstract:
Straipsnyje analizuojama socialinių institucijų kritika, išplėtota Deleuze’o ir Guattari knygose Anti-Oidipas ir Tūkstantis plokštikalnių bei trumpame, bet reikšmingame Deleuze’o tekste „Prierašas apie kontrolės visuomenę“. Deleuze’as ir Guattari kuria mašininę visuomenės sampratą: jų teigimu, skirtingas socialines ir ekonomines formacijas įmanoma įsivaizduoti kaip virtualias mašinas, kurios gali aktualizuotis bet kuriuo istoriniu momentu. Analizuodami valstybės aparatą, Deleuze’as ir Guattari vengia nuorodų į konkrečias valstybes; veikiau jie kalba apie universalią valstybę-formą, kuri veikia kaip užgrobimo aparatas. Valstybė-forma suvokiama kaip suvienodinantis ir standartizuojantis principas, o karo mašina, priešingai, siekia sulaužyti sustingusias formas ir kurti inovacijas. Šie du agregatai – valstybės aparatas ir karo mašina – apibūdina ne tik valstybę ir jai besipriešinančias jėgas, bet persmelkia visas žmogaus veiklos sferas: mokslą, filosofiją, meną. Deleuze’o ir Guattari formuluojama valstybės aparato kritika artima Michelio Foucault disciplinos visuomenės teorijai. Foucault galios samprata taip pat yra mechanicistinė: galia persmelkia sociumą įsikūnydama disciplininiuose aparatuose. Deleuze’as disciplinos visuomenės teorijai priešpriešina savąją kontrolės visuomenės sampratą: priešingai nei disciplininė galia, kuri buvo ilgalaikė, visa apimanti, tačiau netolydi, kontrolė sukuria tolydų ir nuolat kintantį galios tinklą, kuris apraizgo visas žmogaus veiklos sferas.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: socialinės mašinos, valstybės aparatas, karo mašina, disciplinos visuomenė, kontrolės visuomenė.Critique of Social Institutions in Gilles Deleuze’s and Felix Guattari’s PhilosophyAudronė Žukauskaitė SummaryThe article discusses Deleuze’s and Guattari’s notions of society and state. In Anti-Oedipus, Deleuze and Guattari analyze the territorial, despotic and capitalist machines which are seen not as different stages of historical evolution but as different types of an abstract machine. In A Thousand Plateaus Deleuze and Guattari develop the mechanistic notion of the state: the state – form is an abstract machine or a diagram which can be actualized in different historical state forms. The state – form is juxtaposed to another type of assemblage called the nomadic war machine. If the state-form functions as a principle of unification and standardization, the war machine is seen as a principle of metamorphic transformations and innovations. Deleuze and Guattari’s theories of society and state are compared with Michel Foucault’s mechanistic notion of society. Deleuze contrasts his notion of control society to the notion of discipline society by Foucault. If the mechanisms of discipline are discontinuous and function in precise space areas, the mechanisms of control produce continuous and all-encompassing networks which totally merge with our corporeal existence.Keywords: social machines, state apparatus, war machine, discipline society, control society.
3
Žukauskaitė, Audronė. "GILLES’IO DELEUZE’O IR FELIXO GUATTARI MIKROPOLITIKA ŠIUOLAIKINĖS FILOSOFIJOS KONTEKSTE." Problemos 75 (January 1, 2009): 34–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/problemos.2009.0.1978.
Full textAbstract:
Straipsnyje analizuojama Gilles’io Deleuze’o ir Felixo Guattari kuriama mikropolitikos samprata, kuri priešpriešinama makropolitikai, veikiančiai pripažintų politinių teorijų ir apibrėžtų tapatybių lygmenyje. Mikropolitikos projektas siejamas su tapsmo mažuma, mažosios literatūros, mažosios politikos sampratomis, kurios nukreiptos ne į tapatybės kūrimą, bet į tapsmo procesą, inovaciją, eksperimentą. Deleuze’as ir Guattari teigia, jog tapsmas mažuma yra universalus procesas, kurio tikslas – kiekvieno individo autonomija. Deleuze‘o ir Guattari universalaus tapsmo koncepcija priešpriešinama Alaino Badiou kuriamai karingojo universalizmo sampratai. Badiou postuluojamas universalizmas iš pirmo žvilgsnio yra panašus į Deleuze’o ir Guattari siūlomos tapsmo teorijos universalumą, tačiau abiejų teorijų turinys radikaliai skiriasi. Deleuze’ui ir Guattari pats tapsmas mažuma yra universalus procesas; Badiou, priešingai, mažumas ir skirtumus pasitelkia tam, kad juos redukuotų į lygybę ir vienodumą. Badiou siekia panaikinti skirtumus dėl universalizmo, kuris pasiekiamas per tiesos įvykį, bendrą visiems ir kiekvienam.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: mikropolitika, mažoji literatūra, tapsmas mažuma, paskirybė, universalizmas.Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s Micropolitics in the Context of Contemporary PhilosophyAudronė Žukauskaitė SummaryThe article discusses Deleuze and Guattari’s concept of micropolitics in relation with the notions of minor literature and becoming-minoritarian. The concept of minor literature appears in Deleuze and Guattari’s Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature and is defined by three characteristics: 1) the deterritorialization of language; 2) the connection of the individual to a political immediacy; 3) the collective assemblage of enunciation. The notion of minor literature is closely related with the notion of becoming-minoritarian developed in A Thousand Plateaus. Deleuze and Guattari claim that becoming-minoritarian is the universal figure of consciousness. In this sense, any kind of becoming is a revolutionary act, because it changes the political constellation of power and enables the repressed to reach an autonomous condition. The concept of becoming-minoritarian is introduced to the contemporary political context through the notion of minor politics, discussed by Nicholas Thoburn. Minor politics is seen not as a fetishization of marginal identity but rather as a possibility to legitimize the existence of those who lack any social identity. In this sense, the notions of becoming-minoritarian and minor politics are contrasted with Alain Badiou’s claim to universality: the question is raised as to whether becoming-minoritarian should necessarily end in autonomy, as Deleuze and Guattari argue, or, by contrast, whether it should seek to universalize the minor and in this way raise the claim for universal justice.Keywords: micropolitics, minor literature, becoming-minoritiarian, the particular, universalism.
4
Stivale, Charles J., and Ronald Bogue. "Deleuze and Guattari." SubStance 20, no. 1 (1991): 117. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3684887.
Full text
5
Bell, Jeffrey A. "History Undone: Towards a Deleuzo-Guattarian Philosophy of History." Deleuze Studies 2, no. 1 (June 2008): 109–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/e1750224108000196.
Full textAbstract:
For those familiar with the work of Deleuze, and Deleuze and Guattari, it might at first seem unwise to pursue a Deleuze and Guattarian philosophy of history. After all, is it not Deleuze who, in an interview with Antonio Negri, argues that ‘What history grasps in an event is the way it’s actualized in particular circumstances; the event's becoming is beyond the scope of history'? (Deleuze 1995 : 170). And more damningly, Deleuze adds, ‘History isn’t experimental, it's just the set of more or less negative preconditions that make it possible to experiment with something beyond history' (Deleuze 1995 : 170). History, in short, is a starting point for experimental work, but it is precisely history ‘that one leaves behind in order to “become,” that is, to create something new’ (1995: 171). Similarly in A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari argue that ‘History is made by those who oppose history (not by those who insert themselves into it, or even reshape it)’ (Deleuze and Guattari 1987 : 295). In the very first line of his book, Lampert recognizes the possible conclusion these citations might lead one to, namely, ‘Deleuze and Guattari’s philosophy of becoming seems at times opposed to the very idea of historical succession' (1); and yet, as Lampert adeptly demonstrates, it would be a mistake to conclude that opposing history to ‘create something new’, ‘something beyond history’, necessarily entails being hostile to history, to the ‘idea of historical succession’, and thus to a philosophy of history.
6
Saldanha, Arun, and Hannah Stark. "A New Earth: Deleuze and Guattari in the Anthropocene." Deleuze Studies 10, no. 4 (November 2016): 427–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dls.2016.0237.
Full textAbstract:
Twenty years after his death, Deleuze's thought continues to be mobilised in relation to the most timely and critical problems society faces, foremost amongst which is the Anthropocene. What might the significance of Deleuze and Guattari be in relation to the new and urgent set of concerns that the Anthropocene engenders? Deleuze's work presaged much of the concept of the Anthropocene, not only in his sustained challenges to humanism, anthropocentrism and capitalism, but also through his interest in geology and the philosophy of time. Guattari gave his work an ‘ecosophical’ and ‘cartographical’ dimension and spoke of a ‘mechanosphere’ covering the planet. Together, Deleuze and Guattari advocated a ‘geophilosophy’ which called for a ‘new earth’ along with ‘new peoples’. Not only does the work of Deleuze and Guattari offer a range of useful concepts that can be applied to contemporary global problems such as anthropogenic climate change, peak oil and the exploitation of the nonhuman, but it also models the kind of interdisciplinarity that the epoch of the Anthropocene requires. This special issue of Deleuze Studies engages the many philosophical tools provided by Deleuze and Guattari and their interlocutors in order to critically approach our particularly tense moment in terrestrial history. Simultaneously, it asks how this moment could change the ways in which Deleuze and Guattari are further developed.
7
Haesbaert e Glauco Bruce, Rogério. "A Desterritorialização na Obra de Deleuze e Guattari." GEOgraphia 4, no. 7 (September 21, 2009): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/geographia2002.47.a13419.
Full textAbstract:
RESUMO Desterritorialização é uma noção central na obra de Gilles Deleuze e Felix Guattari. Este texto objetiva esclarecer o seu sentido, como uma forma de promover o estimulante diálogo que estes autores propõem para com a Geografia. Palavras-chave: Desterritorialização, Território, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari.ABSTRACT Deterritorialization is a central notion at Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s work This text aims to clarify its sense as a way to promote the stimulating dialogue with Geography. Keywords: Deterritorialization, Territory, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari.
8
Haesbaert e Glauco Bruce, Rogério. "A Desterritorialização na Obra de Deleuze e Guattari." GEOgraphia 4, no. 7 (September 21, 2009): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/geographia2002.v4i7.a13419.
Full textAbstract:
RESUMO Desterritorialização é uma noção central na obra de Gilles Deleuze e Felix Guattari. Este texto objetiva esclarecer o seu sentido, como uma forma de promover o estimulante diálogo que estes autores propõem para com a Geografia. Palavras-chave: Desterritorialização, Território, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari.ABSTRACT Deterritorialization is a central notion at Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s work This text aims to clarify its sense as a way to promote the stimulating dialogue with Geography. Keywords: Deterritorialization, Territory, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari.
9
Choat, Simon. "Deleuze, Marx and the Politicisation of Philosophy." Deleuze Studies 3, Suppl (December 2009): 8–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/e1750224109000695.
Full textAbstract:
Against those who wish to marginalise Deleuze's political relevance, this paper argues that his work – including and especially that produced before his collaborations with Guattari – is not only fundamentally political but also profoundly engaged with Marx. The paper begins by focusing on different possible strategies for contesting the claim that Deleuze is apolitical, attempting to debunk this claim by briefly considering Deleuze's work with Guattari. The bulk of the paper is concerned with a close examination of the appearance of Marx in both Nietzsche and Philosophy and Difference and Repetition, establishing that the ‘pre-Guattari’ Deleuze was fully engaged with both politics and Marx and demonstrating that the concepts and arguments of the Marxist politics of the Deleuze–Guattari books can be traced back to Deleuze's own work. It is argued that an analysis of Deleuze's work on Marx is significant not only for deepening our understanding of Marx, but also for understanding the possibilities for Deleuzian politics.
10
Garo, Isabelle, and Anne Sauvagnargues. "Deleuze, Guattari et Marx." Actuel Marx 52, no. 2 (2012): 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/amx.052.0011.
Full text
11
Buchanan, Ian. "Globalizing Deleuze and Guattari." symploke 9, no. 1 (2001): 102–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sym.2001.0003.
Full text
12
Wiley, Stephen B. Crofts, and J. Macgregor Wise. "Guattari, Deleuze, andCultural Studies." Cultural Studies 33, no. 1 (September 16, 2018): 75–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2018.1515967.
Full text
13
Protevi, John. "Deleuze, Guattari and Emergence." Paragraph 29, no. 2 (July 2006): 19–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/prg.2006.0018.
Full textAbstract:
The concept of emergence—which I define as the (diachronic) construction of functional structures in complex systems that achieve a (synchronic) focus of systematic behaviour as they constrain the behaviour of individual components—plays a crucial role in debates in philosophical reflection on science as a whole (the question of reductionism) as well as in the fields of biology (the status of the organism), social science (the practical subject) and cognitive science (the cognitive subject). In this article I examine how the philosophy of Deleuze and that of Deleuze and Guattari can help us see some of the most important implications of these debates.
14
Lecercle, Jean-Jacques. "Deleuze, Guattari and Marxism." Historical Materialism 13, no. 3 (2005): 35–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1569206054927617.
Full text
15
Tercz, Jakub. "Critique of Pure Unconsciousness: Some Remarks on the Impact of Kant’s Philosophy on Gilles Deleuze’s and Félix Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus." Praktyka Teoretyczna 28, no. 2 (October 15, 2018): 235–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/prt.2018.2.12.
Full textAbstract:
Wbrew popularnym interpretacjom filozofii Deleuze’a jako odmiany postmodernizmu, poststrukturalizmu bądź nietzscheanizmu w artykule przedstawione zostaną jej głębokie korzenie pochodzące z idealizmu transcendentalnego Immanuela Kanta. Postawiona zostaje teza, iż to właśnie Kant stanowił podstawowe źródło filozoficznych schematów inspirujących Deleuze’a zarówno we wczesnym okresie jego twórczości (wyrażonym przede wszystkim w Różnicy i powtórzeniu, 1968), jak i późnym, zapoczątkowanym wraz z Félixem Guattarim przez pierwszy tom Kapitalizmu i schizofrenii, czyli Anty-Edypa (1972). Kontekstowa analiza tego ostatniego stanowi główną część artykułu. W Anty-Edypie Deleuze i Guattari proponują koncepcję pragnienia (nieświadomości) jako siły konstytuującej podmiotowość nomadyczną, otwartą na inność, kreatywną i czerpiącą siłę z różnorodności społecznej. Zauważają jednak, że pragnienie cechuje skłonność do poddawania się wewnętrznym iluzjom i w efekcie blokowania własnych, rewolucyjnych i twórczych możliwości. Właśnie dlatego, twierdzą Deleuze i Guattari, konieczne jest przeprowadzenie krytyki czystej nieświadomości, mającej ujawnić te złudzenia i być może uwolnić nas od nich.
16
Aurora, Simone. "From Structure to Machine: Deleuze and Guattari's Philosophy of Linguistics." Deleuze Studies 11, no. 3 (August 2017): 405–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dls.2017.0274.
Full textAbstract:
This paper aims to consider the main features of the philosophy of linguistics proposed by Deleuze and Guattari, which emerges from the criticisms directed at what in A Thousand Plateaus they call ‘postulates of linguistics’. The paper focuses on the transition from the Saussurean concept of system and from the connected notion of structure to Deleuze and Guattari's concept of machine. More precisely, the purpose of the paper lies, on the one hand, in showing in which sense Deleuze and Guattari claim that language is not a ‘structure’ but a ‘machine’ and why, accordingly, they maintain that the mentioned ‘postulates of linguistics’ must be refused; on the other hand, the paper represents an attempt at placing Deleuze and Guattari's position in the context of contemporary linguistics.
17
Thornton, Edward. "Deleuze and Guattari's Absent Analysis of Patriarchy." Hypatia 34, no. 2 (2019): 348–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12468.
Full textAbstract:
Feminist philosophy has offered mixed opinions on the collaborative projects of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. But although there has been much discussion of the political expediency of what Deleuze and Guattari do say about sexual difference, this article will outline what is absent from Anti‐Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus (the two volumes comprising Capitalism and Schizophrenia). Specifically, I will argue that though Deleuze and Guattari offer a historical account of a range of power structures—most notably capitalism, but also despotism, fascism, and authoritarianism—they give no such account of the development of patriarchy. Secondarily, this article will argue that Deleuze and Guattari's analysis of contemporary power relations could be improved by adding an accompanying analysis of the institution of patriarchy. After offering a detailed account of the technical vocabulary used by Deleuze and Guattari for the analysis of political institutions, I will argue that what their work requires is an account of how patriarchy is historically produced by an “abstract machine” of masculinity. This article will finish with some suggestions for the way that such an account could be given via an analysis of the abstract machine of phallusization.
18
Sotiris, Panagiotis. "The Many Encounters of Deleuze and Marxism." Deleuze Studies 10, no. 3 (August 2016): 301–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dls.2016.0228.
Full textAbstract:
Deleuze's and Guattari's work on schizoanalysis represented an important shift towards a dialogue with Marx and his critique of political economy but in the 1970s prominent Marxists attacked Deleuze (and Guattari) as anti-Marxist. This attitude marked one of the most important missed encounters between Marxism and other theoretical currents. However, there have been important recent contributions that bring forward not only the political character of Deleuze's theoretical endeavour, his critique of capitalist social forms, his conception of social practice and struggle, but also the linkages with the Marxian and Marxist concepts. The aim of this article is to highlight some aspects of the many dialogues between Deleuze and Marxism.
19
Whitlock, Matthew G. "The Wrong Side Out With(out) God: An Autopsy of the Body Without Organs." Deleuze and Guattari Studies 14, no. 3 (August 2020): 507–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2020.0414.
Full textAbstract:
While the Deleuzo-Guattarian concept of ‘body without organs’ (BwO) is developed alongside their critique of Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis, it is also developed alongside their critique of Christianity, most poignantly in the sixth plateau of A Thousand Plateaus. Here Deleuze and Guattari quote Antonin Artaud in order to show how ‘the judgment of God weighs upon and is exercised against the BwO’. In order to understand this relationship between judgement of God and the BwO, this essay explores Deleuze's critiques of Christianity in his earlier works and concludes that the BwO, much like Artaud's own poetry, is developed in contrast to an internalised form of Christianity.
20
Domenech Oneto, Paulo, and Carolina Villada Castro. "LA NOMADOLOGÍA DE DELEUZE-GUATTARI." Escritos 25, no. 54 (2017): 243–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.18566/escr.v25n54.a11.
Full text
21
Chardel, Pierre-Antoine. "Géophilosophie de Deleuze et Guattari." Symposium 8, no. 3 (2004): 694–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/symposium20048361.
Full text
22
Chardel, Pierre-Antoine. "Géophilosophie de Deleuze et Guattari." Symposium 10, no. 2 (2006): 629–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/symposium200610239.
Full text
23
Beaulieu, Alain. "Gilles Deleuze et Félix Guattari." Symposium 12, no. 2 (2008): 196–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/symposium200812235.
Full text
24
Buchanan, Ian. "At globalisere Deleuze og Guattari." Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 4, no. 1 (January 2003): 61–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2003.9672845.
Full text
25
Ives, Richard. "Deeply Ecological Deleuze and Guattari." Humanimalia 4, no. 2 (February 4, 2013): 34–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9992.
Full textAbstract:
Through a critical reading of the notion of “becoming-animal” as proposed by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, it is argued in this paper that the drawing of a simple division between the wild and the tame inevitably results in a restricted concept of ethics that reiterates contemporary structures of oppression. One of the main reasons for the recent interest in Deleuze and Guattari from within critical animal studies is that their philosophy appears to give to nonhuman animals an access to a “becoming” that is equal in power and affect to those open to the human. Upon closer reading, however, it transpires that this equality is just as quickly refused. Ultimately, Deleuze and Guattari, in common with the adherents of Deep Ecology, posit an entry into becoming which effects itself upon the timelessness of the wild, termed “true Nature” by Deleuze and Guattari. As a result, the vast diversity of nonhuman animals are dissolved in a becoming-Nature which lacks both responsibility and respond-ability, thus reinforcing the subjugating superiority both of humanist exceptionalism and of Man’s emergence from a feminized Nature.
26
Beaulieu, Alain. "Deleuze, Guattari et le posthumanisme." interconnections: journal of posthumanism 1, no. 1 (June 25, 2021): 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.26522/posthumanismjournal.v1i1.2580.
Full textAbstract:
Le texte présente quelques avenues possibles pour situer la pensée de Deleuze et Guattari en regard du postumanisme. Les thèmes des machines, des devenirs non-humains et des forces cosmiques de déterritorialisation y sont notamment discutés.
27
Kairiené, Aida. "THE RHIZOMATIC LEARNING FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF POSTSTRUCTURALISM." Journal of Education Culture and Society 11, no. 1 (June 27, 2020): 102–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.1.102.115.
Full textAbstract:
Aim.The postmodernism manifested itself in the second half of the 20th century. The branch of postmodernism is poststructuralism - in fact, it was called French poststructuralism, with the dominant philosophy being “68 philosophy” (Marshall, 2004). In that period, alongside influential works such as Derrida “On Grammatology” (1968), M. Foulcalt “The Madness and Civilization” (1967), J. Kristeva “Semiotics” (1969) emerged and Deleuze, Guattari personalities. According to the Eurydice study, 9 out of 10 students in the European Union study English. Students can learn English not only in formal but also in non-formal and informal forms. This enables the development of rhizomatic learning, which origins lie in Deleuze, Guattari (2004) philosophy. Thus, the problem – related question arises: what is the essence of rhizomatic learning from a perspective of poststructuralism? The aim of the study is to review theoretical considerations in order to reveal the essence of rhizomatic learning from a perspective of poststructuralism.
Method.The research method – a scientific literature review. The literature review examines relevant, current, and recent literature (Grant & Booth, 2009). The literature review is based on philosophical and educational insights. The following sources have been selected for the analysis of rhizomatic learning of English: 1) philosophical and educational books that help to reveal the essence of rhizomatic learning; 2) publications and dissertations on the issue of rhizomatic learning, which helped to analyse the essence of rhizomatic learning from a perspective of poststructuralism.
Results. The antecedents of rhizomatic learning are rhizome and other Deleuze Guattari's (2004) concepts as assemblages, becoming, nomad. The rhizomatic learning based on Deleuze Guattari's (2004) term of rhizome, which has neither beginning nor end (Cormier, 2008), providing a dynamic, open, personalized learning network created by learners themselves that meets their perceived and real needs (Lian, Pineda, 2014). The concept of rhizomatic learning has its own meaning, but is closely related to the concepts of Deleuze, Guattari (2004), such as rhizome, assemblage, becoming, nomad, and so on. It should be noted that the rhizomatic learning from poststructuralism perspective develops and manifests itself through various 'moving' Deleuze, Guattari’s (2004) concepts. The consequences of rhizomatic learning show that rhizomatic learning could be applied successfully in educational science as learning foreign languages in various learning forms.
Conclusion. The scientific analysis revealed that rhizomatic learning develops through Deleuze, Guattari concepts, especially through becoming learner and occurs in lifelong learning of English.
28
Koizumi, Yoshiyuki. "From Dreaming of Desert Islands to Reterritorialising Philosophy." Deleuze and Guattari Studies 12, no. 2 (May 2018): 268–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2018.0308.
Full textAbstract:
In ‘Causes and Reasons of Desert Islands’, Gilles Deleuze presents a mythological and scientific vision in which new islands and new humanity emerge from the opposition between the land and sea in desert islands. However, what Deleuze cannot explain is how such new territory and people are produced and reproduced while rejecting old and conventional generational ways. To break this impasse, which is also present in Difference and Repetition, Deleuze and Guattari intend to retain the absolute movement of deterritorialisation, while acknowledging that deterritorialisation and reterritorialisation always comingle. This theoretical project is found in the critique of Pierre Clastres on counter-state societies, and is taken up by Deleuze and Guattari in What is Philosophy? In this latter work, by creating concepts and constituting a new plane, Deleuze and Guattari offer some conditions of a third reterritorialisation that, after the second reterritorialisation in the democratic states, presents a new way of forging a political and revolutionary philosophy. In this essay, we criticise the opinions that consider Deleuze and Guattari's political philosophy as one version of radical democracy. Their political philosophy should be situated in the post-democratic era to come.
29
Chin, Rita. "Toward a “Minor Literature”? The Case of Ausländerliteratur in Postwar Germany." New Perspectives on Turkey 29 (2003): 61–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0896634600006117.
Full textAbstract:
In recent years, scholars of German literature have increasingly pointed to Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's theory of “minor literature” as a crucial framework for understanding the development of minority cultural production in a variety of twentieth-century contexts (Teraoka, 1987; Suhr, 1989; Spector, 2000). Deleuze and Guattari propose that any minority group writing in a major language produces what they term minor literature, which has the capacity to destabilize and undermine the dominant language, culture, and discourse in which its authors operate (Deleuze and Guattari, 1986, pp. 16-27). This specific confluence of identities, texts, and locations, they suggest, calls into question the very foundations of the majority's world view and self-understanding. Deleuze and Guattari's model marks one of the first efforts by Western theorists to conceptualize cultural work that has traditionally been rendered invisible by classical literary writing and established categories of genre, style, and type.
30
Lundy, Craig. "The Necessity and Contingency of Universal History." Journal of the Philosophy of History 10, no. 1 (March 11, 2016): 51–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341315.
Full textAbstract:
History occupies a somewhat awkward position in the work of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. Although they often criticise history as a practice and advance alternatives that are explicitly anti-historical, such as ‘nomadology’ and ‘geophilosophy’, their scholarship is nevertheless littered with historical encounters and deeply influenced by historians such as Fernand Braudel. One of Deleuze and Guattari’s more significant engagements with history occurs through their reading and theory of universal history. In this paper I will explicate and critically analyse the nature of this universal history vis-à-vis its most pertinent counterpoint: Hegel’s philosophy of world history. In contrast to Hegel’s form of historicism, which universalizes by virtue of a unitary and totalizing force, Deleuze and Guattari develop a universalizing mechanism that is strictly devoid of any privileged essence. Following, Deleuze and Guattari’s form of universal history is marked above all by contingency as opposed to necessity. In this paper I will show precisely how. I will also go on to demonstrate how Deleuze and Guattari’s universal history offers the promise of an historical ontology commensurate with the processes of creativity and becoming, provided that appropriate steps are taken to reaffirm the radical contingency at its heart.
31
Barlott, Tim. "Becoming-sick." Journal of Autoethnography 2, no. 2 (2021): 215–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/joae.2021.2.2.215.
Full textAbstract:
Becoming, a concept from the work of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari,1 is an asignifying process of transformation that unsettles the taken-for-granted. Engaging with micropolitical movements of power and resistance, becomings generate fissures and lines of escape that are difficult to classify or categorize. In this Deleuzio-Guattarian intoxicated poem, the author explores his imperceptible becoming following the surgical removal of an oral cancer.
32
Mota, Fernanda Antônia Barbosa da. "A formação e a prática de ensino dos professores de filosofia da educação a partir de Deleuze e Guattari: a formação de conceitos e a desterritorialização." Dialogia, no. 19 (June 3, 2014): 131–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/dialogia.n19.4815.
Full textAbstract:
O objetivo deste artigo explicitar algumas idias sobre a formao e a prtica de ensino dos professores de filosofia da educao a partir de Deleuze e Guattari. Os aportes tericos que fundamentaram o estudo foram: Albuquerque (1998, 2003), Tomazetti (2003), Severino (2003), Deleuze e Guattari (1996, 2011), Deleuze, (2010) e Gallo (2007, 2008) dentre outros. Ressaltamos que Deleuze e Guattari constituem nossa principal base terica. Aps enfatizar alguns aspectos histricos do campo disciplinar da filosofia da educao e apresentar a proposta de uma filosofia da educao como criao de conceitos, elaboramos uma conceituao de prtica de ensino de filosofia da educao como desterritorializao baseada nas idias de Deleuze e Guattari.
33
Barlott, Tim, Lynda Shevellar, Merrill Turpin, and Jenny Setchell. "The Dissident Interview: A Deterritorializing Guerrilla Encounter." Qualitative Inquiry 26, no. 6 (July 17, 2019): 650–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800419859041.
Full textAbstract:
Drawing from the work of Deleuze and Guattari, we experimentally chart a cartography of a peculiar interview (an “off-topic” and “dissident” interview that disrupts the agenda of the interviewer). In this article, we aim to traverse the micropolitics of the interview, the entangled relations of power and resistance. We intentionally chart the intensive topography of the peculiar and re-present what was once missed (or passed over). Thinking with theory rather than method, we have used Deleuze and Guattari’s conceptualization of social machines, deterritorialization, and desire, to interrogate and experiment with the dissident interview. Performed as a nine-movement guerrilla encounter, the peculiarities of the interview are re-presented as unconventional guerrilla tactics that deterritorialize and disrupt the interview. Our experimentation surfaced some of the ways an interview can be despotic, stifling affective production. However, a Deleuzio-Guattarian war machine prevented the capture and appropriation of the interview and produced a new creative machine.
34
Mattison, Laci. "Virginia Woolf's Ethical Subjectivity: Deleuze and Guattari's Worlding and Bernard's ‘Becoming-Savage’." Deleuze Studies 7, no. 4 (November 2013): 562–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dls.2013.0129.
Full textAbstract:
In Virginia Woolf's 1931 novel The Waves, one of Bernard's many becomings – his ‘becoming-savage’ – reveals a point of intersection between Woolfian aesthetics and Deleuze and Guattari's philosophy. Moreover, a triangulation of Woolf's ‘moments of being’, Deleuze and Guattari's ‘worlding’, and (post)coloniality provides a new and productive node for examining the debates surrounding imperialism in these thinkers’ works, and an insistence that Woolf, read alongside Deleuze and Guattari, offers an alternate and precisely ethical way of being in the world.
35
Colebrook, Claire. "The Secret of Theory." Deleuze Studies 4, no. 3 (November 2010): 287–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dls.2010.0101.
Full textAbstract:
This article focuses on the concept of the secret in Deleuze and Guattari's philosophy, with specific attention to the related concepts of becoming-woman and literature. It contrasts Deleuze and Guattari's immanent mode of reading with oedipal theories of the text and hermeneutics. Whereas Deleuze and Guattari argue for the positivity of the secret, where there is content that is not disclosed and that therefore creates lines of perception and interpretation, the oedipal mode of reading regards the secret as a (negative) effect of reading.
36
Mota, Fernanda Antônia Barbosa da, and Carmen Lúcia De Oliveira Cabral. "A prática educativa através dos tempos: dos antigos aos pós-modernos." EccoS – Revista Científica, no. 31 (December 4, 2013): 207–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n31.3448.
Full textAbstract:
O objetivo deste trabalho explicitar o conceito de prtica educativa de alguns autores extrados de pocas histricas distintas e apresentar uma possvel conceituao de prtica educativa a partir de Deleuze e Guattari. Os aportes tericos que fundamentaram o estudo foram: Jaeger (2001), Rousseau (2001), Dewey (1959), Vzquez (2007) Sacristn (2002), Deleuze e Guattari (1996, 2011), Deleuze, (2010) e Gallo (2008) dentre outros. Ressaltamos que Deleuze e Guattari constituem nossa principal base terica. Aps enfatizar o sentido e o significado das diferentes concepes de prtica educativa no mbito das perspectivas tericas do essencialismo, do romantismo, do pragmatismo, da pedagogia crtica e do ps-modernismo, elaboramos uma conceituao de prtica educativa baseada nas idias de Deleuze e Guattari, a partir da qual revisamos nossa prpria concepo de prtica educativa.
37
Sholtz, Janae. "A Thousand Plateaus and Cosmic Artisanry: On Becoming Destroyer of Worlds." Deleuze and Guattari Studies 15, no. 2 (May 2021): 197–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2021.0436.
Full textAbstract:
In A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari carve out an image of thought and a path for philosophy that is connected to the figure of the cosmic artisan. This article situates the artisan in relation to both past and future, comparing this figure to that of the artist in the work of another great philosopher who desired to bring forth a new beginning for philosophy, Martin Heidegger. After discussing multiple ways that Deleuze and Guattari's thought is world-destroying in terms of past ontological and epistemological commitments, the article considers the cosmic artisan/philosopher's diagrammatic role in light of the technological-scientific advancements within the field of quantum physics. Through these elaborations, it becomes clear that Deleuze and Guattari are articulating the need for a new sensibility – to the imperceptible, the virtual, the compossible and the molecular. Deleuze and Guattari's noological nomadism opens a way forward, where world-destroying becomes linked to creation, and the figure of modernity becomes the possibility of a new relation to the earth – a cosmic earth.
38
Plotnitsky, Arkady. "Chaosmologies: Quantum Field Theory, Chaos and Thought in Deleuze and Guattari's What is Philosophy?" Paragraph 29, no. 2 (July 2006): 40–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/prg.2006.0017.
Full textAbstract:
This article explores the relationships between the philosophical foundations of quantum field theory, the currently dominant form of quantum physics, and Deleuze's concept of the virtual, most especially in relation to the idea of chaos found in Deleuze and Guattari's What is Philosophy?. Deleuze and Guattari appear to derive this idea partly from the philosophical conceptuality of quantum field theory, in particular the concept of virtual particle formation. The article then goes on to discuss, from this perspective, the relationships between philosophy and science, and between their respective ways of confronting chaos, a great enemy but also a great friend of thought, and its greatest ally in its struggle against opinion.
39
Mozère, Liane. "Devenir-femme chez Deleuze et Guattari." Cahiers du Genre 38, no. 1 (2005): 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/cdge.038.0043.
Full text
40
Querrien, Anne. "Foucault, Deleuze et Guattari à l'école." Chimères 53, no. 1 (2004): 95–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/chime.2004.1285.
Full text
41
Krtolica, Igor. "Deleuze et Guattari lecteurs de Kafka." Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, no. 33 (June 1, 2013): 219–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/cps.1928.
Full text
42
Blakley, Chris. "ETHICS IN FOUCAULT AND DELEUZE/GUATTARI." Southwest Philosophy Review 21, no. 1 (2005): 119–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview200521137.
Full text
43
Seigworth, Gregory J., and J. Macgregor Wise. "DELEUZE AND GUATTARI IN CULTURAL STUDIES." Cultural Studies 14, no. 2 (April 2000): 139–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095023800334841.
Full text
44
Somers-Hall, H. "Who's Afraid of Deleuze and Guattari?" French Studies 66, no. 3 (July 1, 2012): 425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fs/kns135.
Full text
45
Filipović, Andrija. "From the sensation to the concept and back: Philo-aesthetic encounters between Pierre Boulez and Gilles Deleuze." New Sound, no. 48-2 (2016): 28–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/newso1648028f.
Full textAbstract:
It is known that Deleuze and Guattari took the famous concepts of the smooth (lisse) and striated (strié) from the last chapter of A Thousand Plateaus from Boulez, who used them to describe the morphology of sound spaces, while Deleuze and Guattari used those concepts in an ontopolitical way - in order to invent an ontology abstract enough to describe the constitution of space and time within the conditions of the capitalist axiomatic and find the corresponding lines of flight. Another important point in the encounter between Boulez and Deleuze is the concept of difference. In Deleuze, difference is the key ontological concept, which (un)grounds the image of thought based on representation and leads to becoming the basic form of thinking the world. According to Campbell, in Boulez, difference appears in a number of ways - from heterophony as a virtual line, through an accumulative development to athematism as a virtual form. It should be mentioned that virtual (virtuel) is another important concept of Deleuze's philosophy, (un)grounded precisely through difference. Furthermore, there is a certain similarity between Boulez's concept of diagonal and Deleuze's and Guattari's concepts of deterritorialization and transversality in the sense that all three of these designate the creation of the new in movement between the already known coordinates. In the end, Deleuze translates Boulez's concepts of temps pulsée and temps non pulsée into the concepts of Chronos and Aion, where Aion designates the qualitative time of becoming, while Chronos the quantitative time of representative thought. The goal of this paper is to research these complex philosophical-aesthetic encounters between Boulez and Deleuze in order to shed light on the ways in which philosophical concepts are created based on art practices, and art practices on the basis of philosophy.
46
Nunes, Rodrigo. "Politics in the Middle: For a Political Interpretation of the Dualisms in Deleuze and Guattari." Deleuze Studies 4, supplement (December 2010): 104–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dls.2010.0208.
Full textAbstract:
The paper identifies three recent lines of interpretation of the politics that can be derived from Deleuze and Guattari, all of which share a way of reading the dualisms in their work that can be traced back to how they understand the actual/virtual partition, and to an alleged pre-eminence of the virtual over the actual. It is argued that this reading is not only inaccurate, but obscures the political dimension of Deleuze and Guattari's work. Clarifying the latter requires a reinterpretation of the dualisms involved (as dyads rather than binaries), of the relation between virtual and actual (as a formal distinction where one acts back upon the other), and the drawing of a clear distinction between what Deleuze calls a ‘transcendent exercise’ of thought and sensibility and the properly metaphysical exercise that sets up the distinction between virtual and actual. What then appears is an image of Deleuze's and Guattari's thought that is far more concerned with practical questions and with a situated political practice of intervention.
47
Caló, Susana. "Semio-Pragmatics as Politics: On Guattari and Deleuze's Theory of Language." Deleuze and Guattari Studies 15, no. 2 (May 2021): 266–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2021.0439.
Full textAbstract:
Focusing on Guattari and Deleuze's collaborative critique of structural linguistics, this article claims that rather than offering an ‘escape from language’, Guattari and Deleuze recast language as a social and political practice. Through a reading of Guattari and Deleuze's analysis of Saussure, their reinterpretation of Hjelmslev, and a discussion of the concepts of order-words and minor use of language, the article shows how, to do this, the authors develop a social and semiotic critique whereby the very concept of language changes from representation to intervention in a material and social field.
48
Haines, Daniel. "From Deleuze and Guattari's Words to a Deleuzian Theory of Reading." Deleuze Studies 9, no. 4 (November 2015): 529–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dls.2015.0203.
Full textAbstract:
While Deleuze and Guattari's passion for certain literature is well known, the nature of a ‘Deleuzian’ literary criticism remains an open question. However, most critics appear to agree that Deleuze and Guattari's comments on meaning and interpretation offer an ontological alternative to the textual focus of deconstruction. Through an interrogation of the difficult style of their books in relation to Plato, Nietzsche and Derrida, this paper offers a different reading of Deleuze and Guattari in relation to literary criticism. Despite appearances, transcendental empiricism and the project of ‘overturning Platonism’ provide a Deleuzian theory of reading that attends to textuality.
49
Evans, Fred. "Deleuze's Political Ethics: A Fascism of the New?" Deleuze Studies 10, no. 1 (February 2016): 85–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/dls.2016.0213.
Full textAbstract:
The cosmology of Deleuze and Guattari emphasises the new. I raise the question of whether this emphasis cancels out two other political virtues, solidarity and heterogeneity, and thereby amounts to a fascism of the new. I reply that what Deleuze and Guattari say about cosmological unity and difference suggests that they can avoid this negative designation. I support this conclusion by considering their statements on ethics and politics and by translating their cosmological philosophy into the more immediate ethico-political context of the alloplastic stratum. The latter effort is abetted by elaborating the two thinkers’ use of the term ‘voice’, for example, in Deleuze's statement that Being is the ‘single and same voice for the whole thousand-voiced multiple … a single clamour of Being for all beings’ or in the two authors’ notion of a ‘constellation of voices’ that makes up the ‘molecular’ or ‘unconscious’ collective assemblage of enunciation. This elaboration is pertinent because political ethics is essentially which voices are heard, and which not, or at least their relative levels of audibility in the alloplastic regime. I further clarify this treatment of Deleuze and Guattari's political ethics by linking it to the idea of parrhesia, courageous speech and hearing.
50
Faucher, Kane X. "McDeleuze: What's More Rhizomal than the Big Mac?" Deleuze Studies 4, no. 1 (March 2010): 42–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/e1750224110000796.
Full textAbstract:
The popularity of Deleuze and Guattari is an undeniable precedent in current theoretical exchanges, and it could be stated without much contention that one's theoretical positioning must at some point deal with the salient conceptual offerings of Deleuze and Guattari, especially their double-opus, Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus wherein a wealth of critique abounds. However, the significant trends concerning Deleuze and Guattari ‘scholarship’ may be jeopardised by the (ab)use of certain conceptual themes and methods in their work that are distorted and employed by big business looking to secure their legacies of power by means of a control mechanism that looks to subjugate an entire world by means of (to borrow a term from Mihai Spariosu) ‘globalitarianism’. Our aim here will be to use McDonald's Corporation as an example of how the theoretical offerings of Deleuze and Guattari have been indirectly and hastily deployed for corporate ends, how these attempts are counter-Deleuzian, and to answer at least one of Žižek's criticisms against Deleuze.