Relevant bibliographies by topics / Deliberativ / Books
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Deliberativ.

Books on the topic 'Deliberativ'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 11 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Deliberativ.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Himmelroos, Staffan. Det demokratiska samtalet: En studie av deliberativ demokrati i ett medborgarforum. Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademis förlag/Åbo Akademi University Press, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver, Daniel Gaus, Tanja Hitzel-Cassagnes, and Franziska Martinsen, eds. Deliberative Kritik - Kritik der Deliberation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02860-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Warren, Mark. Deliberative democracy. México, D.F: FLACSO, Sede Académica de México, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Chappell, Zsuzsanna. Deliberative Democracy. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26544-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Parkinson, John, and Jane Mansbridge, eds. Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139178914.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

editor, Palanithurai G., and Gandhigram Rural Institute. Department of Political Science and Development Administration, eds. Deliberative democracy. Chennai: MJP Publishers, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Deliberative freedom: Deliberative democracy as critical threory. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fishkin, James S., and Peter Laslett, eds. Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470690734.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Schweitzer, Eva Johanna. Deliberative Polling®. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81339-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Ehling, Ulrike. Deliberative Global Governance. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13826-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Warren, Mark E., and Hilary Pearse, eds. Designing Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511491177.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

L, Marty Debian, ed. Dialogue & deliberation. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Carr, Mark F. Passionate Deliberation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0591-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Maffettone, Sebastiano, and Giancarlo Bosetti. Democrazia deliberativa, cosa è. Roma: LUISS University Press, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Curato, Nicole, Marit Hammond, and John B. Min. Power in Deliberative Democracy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95534-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Kloß, Andrea. Deliberative Offenheit durch Empathie. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32435-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Deliberative democracy in practice. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

He, Baogang, Michael G. Breen, and James S. Fishkin. Deliberative Democracy in Asia. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003102441.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Democracy and deliberation. Kenwyn: Juta & Co., 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Deliberativ politikk: Demokrati i teori og praksis. [Oslo]: Tano, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Tanasoca, Ana. Deliberation Naturalized. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851479.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Democratic theory’s deliberative turn has hit a dead end. It is unable to find a good way to scale up its small-scale, formally organized deliberative mini-publics to include the entire community. Some turn to deliberative systems for a way out, but none have found a credible way to deliberatively involve the citizenry at large. Deliberation Naturalized offers an alternative way out—one we have been using all along. The key sites of democratic deliberation are everyday political conversations among people networked across the community. Informal networked deliberation is how all citizens deliberate together, directly or indirectly. That is how public opinion emerges in civil society. Networked deliberation satisfies the classic deliberative desiderata of inclusion, equality, and reciprocity reasonably well, albeit differently than standard mini-publics. Reconceptualizing democratic deliberation in this way highlights some real threats to the networked mode of deliberative democracy, such as polarization, message repetition, and pluralistic ignorance. Deliberation Naturalized assesses the extent of each of those threats and proposes ways of protecting real existing deliberative democracy against them. By focusing on the mechanisms underpinning every democratic deliberation among citizens, Deliberation Naturalized offers a truly novel approach to deliberative democracy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Deliberation Naturalized: Improving Real Existing Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

van, Aaken Anne, List Christian, and Luetge Christoph 1969-, eds. Deliberation and decision: Economics, constitutional theory, and deliberative democracy. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver, Daniel Gaus, Tanja Hitzel-Cassagnes, and Franziska Martinsen. Deliberative Kritik - Kritik der Deliberation: Festschrift für Rainer Schmalz-Bruns. Springer VS, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Floridia, Antonio. From Participation to Deliberation: A Critical Genealogy of Deliberative Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2021.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

From Paricipation to Deliberation: A Critical Genealogy of Deliberative Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2017.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Using Deliberative Techniques to Teach Financial Literacy (Deliberating Across the Curriculum). International Debate Education Association, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Parkinson, John. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, USA, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Fishkin, James S. Reimagining Democratic Possibilities. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198820291.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
Consider four main arguments against applications of deliberative democracy—domination by the more advantaged, polarization, lack of citizen competence, and the gap between mini-publics and the broader society. We consider why these problems seem intractable according to the political theory literature. Drawing on the case studies in Part III, we show that these challenges can be overcome. Thought experiments for deliberation are considered, drawing on work from John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas. The argument for applied deliberative democracy, as in Deliberative Polling, is developed. “Deliberative systems,” where deliberation enters a democratic decision process at one point or another, are discussed. Topics include reform of the US presidential selection process, commissions within specific issue domains such as the Texas utility experience, the Japanese use of Deliberative Polling, and the use of Deliberation Day. The issue of constitutional change is also discussed, drawing on the recent Deliberative Poll in Mongolia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Deliberation and Decision: Economics, Constitutional Theory and Deliberative Democracy (Law, Ethics and Economics). Ashgate Publishing, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Landwehr, Claudia. Depoliticization, Repoliticization, and Deliberative Systems. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198748977.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative democracy is increasingly criticized as inherently elitist and technocratic, and it is blamed not only for the rise of depoliticized institutions, but also for the rise of anti-political and even populist attitudes in citizens. The chapter analyses the discussion about the depoliticizing implications and effects of deliberation and argues that, contrary to these critics, deliberation must be viewed as a genuinely political mode of interaction. A systemic perspective on deliberation allows us to critically assess the deliberative and democratic qualities of political systems and to see when and where they fail to deliver on their promises. Applied with critical intentions, the deliberative system perspective can be used to identify depoliticized policy areas and undemocratic decision-making processes. Moreover, it can feed into processes of meta-deliberation that allow for a democratization of institutional design.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Callard, Agnes. Akrasia. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190639488.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
The standard analysis of weak-willed (akratic) action is that the agent acts on a reason she acknowledges as weaker than another she could have acted on. I argue that it does not make sense to think that the akratic “adds up” all her reasons and then opts to act on the weaker set. Instead, we must conclude that the akratic is unable to add up the relevant considerations, because she is intrinsically conflicted. Intrinsically conflicted agents inhabit two evaluative perspectives at the same time, but only one of them—the dominant perspective—governs their deliberative activity. The akratic acts against her deliberation, because she is motivated by the subordinate evaluative perspective from which she does not deliberate. She acts on reasons her reasoning failed to take into account. Akrasia occurs because agents sometimes need to make use of—deliberate from—values they don’t (fully) have.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Bächtiger, André, and John Parkinson. Mapping and Measuring Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672196.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative democracy has challenged two widely accepted nostrums about democratic politics: that people lack the capacities for effective self-government; and that democratic procedures are arbitrary and do not reflect popular will; indeed, that the idea of popular will is itself illusory. On the contrary, deliberative democrats have shown that people are capable of being sophisticated, creative problem solvers, given the right opportunities in the right kinds of democratic institutions. But deliberative empirical research has its own problems. In this book two leading deliberative scholars review decades of that research and reveal three important issues. First, the concept ‘deliberation’ has been inflated so much as to lose empirical bite; second, deliberation has been equated with entire processes of which it is just one feature; and third, such processes are confused with democracy in a deliberative mode more generally. In other words, studies frequently apply micro-level tools and concepts to make macro- and meso-level judgements, and vice versa. Instead, Bächtiger and Parkinson argue that deliberation must be understood as contingent, performative, and distributed. They argue that deliberation needs to be disentangled from other communicative modes; that appropriate tools need to be deployed at the right level of analysis; and that scholars need to be clear about whether they are making additive judgements or summative ones. They then apply that understanding to set out a new agenda and new empirical tools for deliberative empirical scholarship at the micro, meso, and macro levels.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Levy, Ron, Ian O'Flynn, and Hoi L. Kong. Deliberative Peace Referendums. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867036.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
‘Peace referendums’, which seek to manage armed conflict, are increasingly common around the world. Yet such referendums remain erratic forces—liable as often to aggravate as to resolve tensions. In this book we consider when, despite their risks, referendums can play useful roles amid conflict. We argue that this largely depends on a referendum’s design, including how well it incorporates contemporary lessons from the theory and practice of deliberative democracy. Deliberative democracy seeks to channel disagreement into reasoned forms of decision-making—for instance, by identifying certain ‘public’ values around which disparate groups may find a measure of common ground. As yet, however, few deliberative democracy scholars have advanced arguments for referendums in conflict societies. This is unsurprising: while designing a referendum to be deliberative is a challenge even in the most peaceable of societies, in a conflict society it is harder still. Nevertheless, discounting deliberative institutional schemes because deliberation appears too difficult, and a society too conflictual, overlooks the possibility that some armed conflict can be traced to scarce opportunities to deliberate in the first place. Using a distinctive combination of deliberative democratic and constitutional theory, and also drawing from the field of conflict studies, we develop what we call the Deliberative Peace Referendum—a referendum held under conditions of conflict and designed to be deliberative. This kind of referendum has two broad objectives: to assist a peace settlement to be achieved, and to secure the settlement’s long-term resilience. After scaffolding a tenuous agreement, the referendum may help to concretize an agreement as a durable constitutional settlement by drawing on deliberative democracy’s perceived legitimacy. A Deliberative Peace Referendum thus takes aim at the standard pathologies of referendums—pathologies that must be addressed if referendums are to avoid repeating the problems of peace referendums in the past. Our purpose with this book is to rescue peace referendums from their habitual under-theorization and poor design, and to rehabilitate them as genuine tools of conflict management.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Legitimacy of Citizen-led Deliberative Democracy: Bridging the Gap Between Mini-Publics and Macro Deliberation. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

1940-, Elster Jon, ed. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Deliberative Democracy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Bohman, James, and William Rehg, eds. Deliberative Democracy. The MIT Press, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2324.001.0001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Ottmann, Henning, and Pavo Barisic, eds. Deliberative Demokratie. Nomos, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845257440.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Elster, Jon, ed. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139175005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Lyon, Arabella. Deliberative Acts. Penn State University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780271062228.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Bächtiger, Andre, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative democracy has been the main game in contemporary political theory for two decades and has grown enormously in size and importance in political science and many other disciplines, and in political practice. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy takes stock of deliberative democracy as a research field, as well as exploring and creating links with multiple disciplines and policy practice around the globe. It provides a concise history of deliberative ideals in political thought while also discussing their philosophical origins. It locates deliberation in a political system with different spaces, publics, and venues, including parliament and courts but also governance networks, protests, mini-publics, old and new media, and everyday talk. It documents the intersections of deliberative ideals with contemporary political theory, involving epistemology, representation, constitutionalism, justice, and multiculturalism. It explores the intersections of deliberative democracy with major research fields in the social sciences and law, including social and rational choice theory, communications, psychology, sociology, international relations, framing approaches, policy analysis, planning, democratization, and methodology. It engages with practical applications, mapping deliberation as a reform movement and as a device for conflict resolution. It documents the practice and study of deliberative democracy around the world, in Asia, Latin America, Africa, Europe, and global governance. And it provides reflections on the field by pioneering thinkers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Gastil, John, Katherine R. Knobloch, and Jason Gilmore. The Internal Dynamics and Political Power of Small Group Political Deliberation. Edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.023.

Full text
Abstract:
The authors essay summarize the implications of public deliberation scholarship for the study of political communication as it occurs in small social bodies, from dyadic conversations and small groups to structured deliberative bodies, such as Citizens’ Assemblies. They begin by illustrating the growth, impact, and importance of this relatively new area of study in political communication. The heart of the essay contains a review of the findings of key studies relevant to, influenced by, or designed to advance deliberative theories of group behavior. The third section emphasizes one particular subarea of importance in this body of work—the potential power of connecting small group deliberation with large-scale public judgment. In the final section, the authors identify some of the key unanswered questions about group deliberation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Deliberative Freedom Deliberative Democracy As Critical Theory. State University of New York Press, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Boniolo, Giovanni. The Art of Deliberating: Democracy, Deliberation and the Life Sciences between History and Theory. Springer, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Boniolo, Giovanni. The Art of Deliberating: Democracy, Deliberation and the Life Sciences between History and Theory. Springer, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

The Art of Deliberating: Democracy, Deliberation and the Life Sciences between History and Theory. Springer, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Talisse, Robert B. Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Deliberativ' for other source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography