Academic literature on the topic 'Denver Developmental Screening Test'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Denver Developmental Screening Test.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Denver Developmental Screening Test"
Dick, Nathan P., Gillian Bryant, and Kathleen Davies. "Denver Developmental Screening Test." Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 15, no. 6 (November 12, 2008): 849–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1973.tb04929.x.
Full textKoupernik, Cyrille. "THE DENVER DEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING TEST." Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 10, no. 6 (November 12, 2008): 796a—797a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1968.tb02985.x.
Full textHERSHER, LEONARD. "Denver Developmental Test Problems." Pediatrics 86, no. 1 (July 1, 1990): 148–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.86.1.148b.
Full textFung, K. P., and S. P. Lau. "Denver Developmental Screening Test: Cultural variables." Journal of Pediatrics 106, no. 2 (February 1985): 343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80321-8.
Full textElliman, A. M., E. M. Bryan, A. D. Elliman, P. Palmer, and L. Dubowitz. "Denver developmental screening test and preterm infants." Archives of Disease in Childhood 60, no. 1 (January 1, 1985): 20–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.60.1.20.
Full textADESMAN, ANDREW R. "Is the Denver II Developmental Test Worthwhile?" Pediatrics 90, no. 6 (December 1, 1992): 1009–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.90.6.1009.
Full textSriyaporn, Poolsook P., W. Pissasoontorn, and Orathai Sakdisawadi. "Denver Developmental Screening Test Survey of Bangkok Children." Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 7, no. 3 (July 1994): 173–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/101053959400700305.
Full textKoesnandar, Effie, Soedjatmiko Soedjatmiko, and Pustika Amalia. "Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status and Denver Developmental Screening Test II in high risk infant and toddler." Paediatrica Indonesiana 50, no. 1 (August 15, 2016): 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.14238/pi50.1.2010.26-30.
Full textGLASCOE, FRANCES PAGE, and KAREN E. BYRNE. "Is the Denver II Developmental Test Worthwhile?" Pediatrics 90, no. 6 (December 1, 1992): 1010–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.90.6.1010.
Full textWilliams, Phoebe Danz, and Arthur Ross Williams. "Denver Developmental Screening Test Norms: A Cross-Cultural Comparison." Journal of Pediatric Psychology 12, no. 1 (1987): 39–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/12.1.39.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Denver Developmental Screening Test"
Beteli, Vivian Cesar. "Acompanhamento do desenvolvimento infantil em creches." Universidade de São Paulo, 2006. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/7/7133/tde-02102006-153741/.
Full textThe period of life in which children are enrolled in institutions of child education (pre-school and day care centers) is a critical phase for the child development. Among the developmental areas, the language is the most susceptible since it strongly needs someone elses intervention. Due to the development importance child follow-up is a basic health care in nursing. The purpose of this study was to describe the development profile, specially regarding language abilities of healthy children with ages ranging from 0 to 6 incomplete years, who were enrolled in child day care centers. This is a quantitative, descriptive and longitudinal (cohort) study with a non-probabilistic sampling. The Denver II Developmental Screening Test (DDST II) was used. From 2001 to 2004, 150 DDST III were applied in children with ages varying from 4 months and 23 days up to 5 years, 7 months and 11 days. These children were enrolled in good quality Day Care Centers located in the city of São Paulo. The criteria of inclusion were as follows: identified gestational age (for those under the age of 2 years), lack of congenital malformation, born Brazilian (due to the language area) and never been enrolled in a day care center before. The socioeconomic condition of the families was homogeneous, average of 7.60 minimum wage, thus, above the mean income per capita in the metropolitan area of São Paulo, in the same period, which was 4.28 minimum wages. The results were statistically equal in three Day Care Centers, both for the global result of the DDST II and for the language ability areas alone. There was no statistical association of the results regarding gender. In terms of global results, a statistically significant improve was observed in the five evaluations performed (1a x 3a p=0.015). Language performance maintained statistically equal on these five moments. Consequently, it was possible to demonstrate the following likelihood features: the three institutions were not able to optimize the conditions needed to give the child full development of his/her language abilities and/or the DDST II did not allow an adequate screening in this area. In the first option, it seems that language abilities may decrease when the child reaches the age of three years and developing later. At this moment, the educator/child module is below the recommended level. Regarding the second option, the DDSTII is not yet validated for the Portuguese language in Brazil. It was concluded that to enroll children in day care centers seems to be effective for the global child development. Regarding language abilities further studies are still needed.
Pomes, Maria, and Maria Pomes. "Examination of the Spanish Translation of a Developmental Screening Instrument." Thesis, University of Oregon, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/12332.
Full textCunha, Hilton Luiz da. "Avalia??o do desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor em crian?as na rede b?sica de sa?de utilizando o teste de Denver II: identifica??o de fatores de risco materno." Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 2008. http://repositorio.ufrn.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/13118.
Full textAlterations in the neuropsychomotor development of children are not rare and can manifest themselves with varying intensity at different stages of their development. In this context, maternal risk factors may contribute to the appearance of these alterations. A number of studies have reported that neuropsychomotor development diagnosis is not an easy task, especially in the basic public health network. Diagnosis requires effective, low-cost, and easy - to-apply procedures. The Denver Developmental Screening Test, first published in 1967, is currently used in several countries. It has been revised and renamed as the Denver II Test and meets the aforementioned criteria. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to apply the Denver II Test in order to verify the prevalence of suspected neuropsychomotor development delay in children between the ages of 0 and 12 months and correlate it with the following maternal risk factors: family income, schooling, age at pregnancy, drug use during pregnancy, gestational age, gestational problems, type of delivery and the desire to have children. For data collection, performed during the first 6 months of 2004, a clinical assessment was made of 398 children selected by pediatricians and the nursing team of each public health unit. Later, the parents or guardians were asked to complete a structured questionnaire to determine possible risk indicators of neuropsychomotor development delay. Finally the Denver II Developmental Screening Test (DDST) was applied. The data were analyzed together, using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software, version 6.1. The confidence interval was set at 95%. The Denver II Test yielded normal and questionable results. This suggests compromised neuropsychomotor development in the children examined and deserves further investigation. The correlation of the results with preestablished maternal risk variables (family income, mother s schooling, age at pregnancy, drug use during the pregnancy and gestational age) was strongly significant. The other maternal risk variables (gestational problems, type of delivery and desire to have children) were not significant. Using an adjusted logistic regression model, we obtained the estimate of the greater likelihood of a child having suspected neuropsychomotor development delay: a mother with _75 4 years of schooling, chronological age less than 20 years and a drug user during pregnancy. This study produced two manuscripts, one published in Acta Cir?rgica Brasileira , in which an analysis was performed of children with suspected neuropsychomotor development delay in the city of Natal, Brazil. The other paper (to be published) analyzed the magnitude of the independent variable maternal schooling associated to neuropsychomotor development delay, every 3 months during the first twelve months of life of the children selected.. The results of the present study reinforce the multifactorial characteristic of development and the cumulative effect of maternal risk factors, and show the need for a regional policy that promotes low-cost programs for the community, involving children at risk of neuropsychomotor development delay. Moreover, they suggest the need for better qualified health professionals in terms of monitoring child development. This was an inter- and multidisciplinary study with the integrated participation of doctors, nurses, nursing assistants and professionals from other areas, such as statisticians and information technology professionals, who met all the requirements of the Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
As altera??es do desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor na crian?a n?o s?o raras e podem manifestar-se com intensidade vari?vel em diferentes etapas do seu desenvolvimento. Neste contexto, fatores de risco materno podem contribuir para o aparecimento daquelas altera??es. Alguns estudos t?m relatado que o diagn?stico neuropsicomotor n?o ? uma tarefa f?cil, sobretudo, na rede b?sica de sa?de. Isto requer procedimentos eficazes, de baixo custo e de f?cil aplicabilidade. O Teste de Triagem de Desenvolvimento de Denver, publicado pela primeira vez em 1967, hoje usado em diversos pa?ses, revisado e nominado atualmente como Teste de Denver II, preenche aqueles crit?rios. Dessa forma, o objetivo deste estudo foi aplicar o Teste de Denver II com a finalidade de verificar a preval?ncia de suspeita de atraso no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor de crian?as de 0 a 12 meses de idade e correlacionar com fatores maternos de risco: renda familiar, escolaridade, idade ao engravidar, uso de drogas durante a gesta??o, idade gestacional, intercorr?ncias gestacionais, tipo de parto e o desejo de ter o filho. Para a coleta dos dados, realizada nos seis primeiros meses do ano de 2004, inicialmente foi feita a avalia??o cl?nica das 398 crian?as selecionadas com a participa??o de pediatras e equipe de enfermagem de cada posto de sa?de; posteriormente, os pais ou cuidadores responderam a um question?rio estruturado para determina??o de poss?veis indicadores de risco de desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor. Finalmente, aplicou-se o Teste de Triagem de Desenvolvimento de Denver II (Teste de Denver II). Os dados coletados foram analisados em conjunto, atrav?s do programa Statistical Package for Social Science SPSS, vers?o 6.1. Utilizou-se o intervalo de confian?a de 95%. Atrav?s da aplica??o do Teste de Denver II, obtivemos resultados Normais e Question?veis. Estes sugerem preju?zos no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor da crian?a examinada e merece maior investiga??o. A correla??o dos resultados com as vari?veis de risco materno pr?-estabelecidas renda familiar, escolaridade da m?e, idade ao engravidar, uso de drogas durante a gesta??o e idade gestacional foi fortemente significativa. As outras vari?veis de risco materno - intercorr?ncias gestacionais, tipo de parto e desejo de ter filho - n?o foram significativas. Atrav?s da t?cnica multivariada de regress?o log?stica, chegamos ? estimativa de maior probabilidade de uma crian?a ser suspeita de atraso de desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor: m?e com instru??o escolar formal _ 4 anos, idade cronol?gica inferior a 20 anos e usu?ria de droga durante a gesta??o. Este estudo gerou dois manuscritos, um deles publicado na "Acta "Cir?rgica Brasileira , pela qual se faz uma an?lise de crian?as com suspeita de atraso no seu desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor na rede p?blica de sa?de, da cidade de Natal. O outro manuscrito, a ser publicado, analisa a magnitude da vari?vel independente escolaridade materna associada ? suspeita de atraso de desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor, trimestralmente, nos doze primeiros meses de vida das crian?as selecionadas. Os resultados apresentados neste estudo refor?am a caracter?stica multifatorial de neurodesenvolvimento e o efeito cumulativo dos fatores de risco ix materno; alertam para a necessidade de uma pol?tica regional que promovam programas de baixo custo e abordagem comunit?ria, envolvendo crian?as com riscos de atraso no seu desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor. Al?m disso, sugere um melhor preparo de todos os profissionais de sa?de em rela??o ? vigil?ncia do desenvolvimento da crian?a. Esta foi uma pesquisa inter e multidisciplinar pela participa??o integrada de profissionais da sa?de, como m?dicos, enfermeiros, auxiliares de enfermagem e profissionais de outras ?reas, como estat?sticos e profissionais de inform?tica, que preenchem todos os requisitos do Programa de P?sgradua??o em Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Derubeis, Susan M. "The computerized Denver Developmental Screening Test development, use, and reliability /." 1985. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/68787785.html.
Full textKastning, Silke Gappa Monika. "Neurodevelopmental outcome of 54 formerly preterm and very low birth weight infants at the age of two to four years in the Denver Developmental Screening Test /." 2004. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=013203512&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA.
Full text吳佳錦. "A study of birth to three infant-toddler communication and language developmental screening test on reliability and norm." Thesis, 2007. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/19757769387015850961.
Full textCurrie, Lisa. "INVESTIGATION OF THE TEST CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO SCREENING TOOLS IN COMPARISON TO A GOLD STANDARD ASSESSMENT TO DETECT DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY: A PILOT STUDY." 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10222/14160.
Full textHsuan, Huang Ai, and 黃艾萱. "A Study of Birth to Three Infant-Toddler Communication and Language Developmental Screening Test on Concurrent Validity and Predictive Validity." Thesis, 2007. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/75251215979222218769.
Full text臺北市立教育大學
溝通障礙碩士學位學程
96
The main purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity and predictive validity of the “Birth to Three Infant-Toddlers Communication and Language Developmental Screening Test,(0-3CLST)” as well as to investigate the best cutoff points using to screen the high risk children. There are 153 subjects (age of 17-36 months) participating in testing concurrent validity and 225 subjects (NH=206, DD=19) in predictive validity. Comparisons were made between the 0-3CLST and language subtest from “the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers (CDIIT) screening test”. Correlation analyses, classification analyses, and ROC analyses were also conducted. The study has found that (1) the concurrent validity was .77(p<.01). (2)0-3CLST has good predictive validity for the language subtest of CDIIT screening test .78(p<.01). (3)The AUC.81~ .85 means that the test possesses good classification accuracy. (4) When the cutoff point is set at -1.5SD, the following numbers show good prediction: the SEN of .70, SPE of .99, Hit Rate .96 and PPV of .88. The evidence, therefore, has given strong support to suggest that the 0-3CLST has good concurrent validity and predictive validity, which can be used effectively in screening children with communication and language developmental delays.
Miao, Lee Chia, and 李佳妙. "A Study of Birth to Three Infant-Toddlers Communication and Language Developmental Screening Test on Content Validity and Construct Validity." Thesis, 2007. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/96411128067981746687.
Full text臺北市立教育大學
溝通障礙碩士學位學程
95
The major purpose of study was through the screening tool “Birth to Three Infant-Toddlers Communication and Language Developmental Screening Test” for the identification of communication in infants and toddlers to examine the content validity, construct validity as well as the relationship between the gender, living area, parents’ education degrees, occupation, language used and foreign spouse. There are total 1,236 children were screened (ages 0-36 months) with “Birth to Three Infant-Toddler Communication and Language Developmental Screening Test” which edited by researcher and the administration of test was to interview with the caregivers of children. All items collected of screening test were based on good documents, high internal consistency alpha values and acceptable discrimination levels. The professional validity was based on 35 experienced speech pathologists and preschool teachers checking all items of screening test. The result obviously manifested the “Birth to Three Infant-Toddlers Communication and Language Developmental Screening Test” having an excellent construct validity with its sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between typically developing and language-delayed children and also the findings indicated significantly greater age and scores but no significant differences between gender, living areas, parents’ education degree, occupation, mother language and foreign spouse. The “Birth to Three Infant-Toddlers Communication and Language Developmental Screening Test” was strongly supported by good content validity, professional validity and construct validity and it suits to all birth to three infants and toddlers in Taiwan.
Heckroodt, Annétia Sophia. "Evaluering van skoolbeginners met die oog op effektiewe aanvangsonderrig." Diss., 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16926.
Full textText in Afrikaans
With compulsory education in the New South· Africa, an increase in the number of school beginners can be expected, together with the probability of large gaps in their readiness for school. In £his study, materials have been developed together with a structure for the organisation of teaching_~!?.r trainers/subject advisers, teachers and pupils, to ensure effective education for school beginners. The "Battery for the Assessment of Bridging period Yields" (BABY) has been developed as a valid, realiable and usable school readiness battery of tests for teachers as unregistered test users. The Pre-Test for division into homogeneous ability groups is applied shortly after entrance to school. The Battery of Diagnostic Tests ensures continuous evaluation of pupils during the school readiness programme. The Post-Test is applied at the end of the first term. In this dynamic interaction between tester and pupil in an instruction-test-instruction cycle, the pupils' readiness to progress with formal instruction is continuously evaluated.
Met verpligte onderwys in die Nuwe Suid-Afrika, kan 'n toename in die getal swart skoolbeginners ve:wag word, asook dat daar in hulle skoolvoorbereiding groot leemtes kan voorkom. In die onderhawige studie is hulpmiddels en 'n struktuur vir onderwysorganisasie vir opleiers/vakadviseurs, onderwyseresse en leerlinge ontwikkel om aan skoolbeginners effektiewe onderwys te verseker. Die "Battery for the Assessment of Bridging period Yields" (BABY), 'n geldige, betroubare en bruikbare skoolgereedheidstoetsbattery vir onderwyseresse as ongeregistreerde toetsgebruikers, is ontwikkel. Die Voortoets vtr indeling in homogene bevoegdheidsgroepe word kort na skooltoetrede toegepas. Die Diagnostiese Toetsbattery verseker deurlopende evaluering van leerlinge gedurende die skoolgereedmakingsprogram. Die Natoets word aan die einde van die eerste kwartaal toegepas. In hierdie dinamiese interaksie tussen toetser en leerling in 'n onderrig-toets-onderrig siklus, word leerlinge se gereedheid om met formele onderrig voort te gaan, deurlopend geevalueer.
Psychology og Education
M. Ed. (Psychology of Education)
Books on the topic "Denver Developmental Screening Test"
Frankenburg, William K. Denver II: Screening manual. Denver: Denver Developmental Materials, Inc., 1990.
Find full textDenver II: Training manual. 2nd ed. Denver: Denver Developmental Materials, Inc., 1992.
Find full textOrganisation for economic co-operation and development. Test No. 421: Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. Paris: OECD Publishing, 1995.
Find full textBlakeley, Robert W. Screening test for developmental apraxia of speech: Examiner's manual. 2nd ed. Austin, Tex: Pro-ed, 2001.
Find full textGoddard, Sally. Assessing neuromotor readiness for learning: The INPP developmental screening test and school intervention programme. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
Find full textTest No. 421: Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. OECD, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264264380-en.
Full textTest No. 421: Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. OECD, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264070967-en.
Full textTest No. 421: Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. OECD, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264242692-en.
Full textTest No. 422: Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. OECD, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264264403-en.
Full textTest No. 422: Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. OECD, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264070981-en.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Denver Developmental Screening Test"
Stabel, Aaron, Kimberly Kroeger-Geoppinger, Jennifer McCullagh, Deborah Weiss, Jennifer McCullagh, Naomi Schneider, Diana B. Newman, et al. "Denver Development Screening Test (DDST)." In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, 857–58. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_613.
Full textHansen, Robin. "Denver Development Screening Test (DDST)." In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1317–19. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91280-6_613.
Full textBerdasco, Antonio, and José R. Jordan. "The Denver Developmental Screening Test in Population Studies." In Early Identification of Children at Risk, 303–8. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0536-9_22.
Full textSiegel, Bryna. "Pervasive Developmental Disorders Screening Test (PDDST)." In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2211–15. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_600.
Full textSiegel, Bryna. "Pervasive Developmental Disorders Screening Test (PDDST)." In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3447–51. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91280-6_600.
Full textPadilla, Stephanie. "Zebrafish Development: High-Throughput Test Systems to Assess Developmental Toxicity." In High-Throughput Screening Methods in Toxicity Testing, 371–83. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118538203.ch20.
Full textLee, Seong-A., Chung-Yill Park, and Kang-Suk Lee. "Validity of Developmental Delay Screening Test; Using Latent Class Model." In Communications in Computer and Information Science, 129–37. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27180-9_16.
Full textFirth, Helen V., Jane A. Hurst, and Judith G. Hall. "Denver Developmental Screening Test." In Oxford Desk Reference - Clinical Genetics. Oxford University Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/1.1.med-9780192628961-div1-007010.
Full text"Denver Developmental Screening Test (Cardiff Modification)." In A Synopsis of Children's Diseases, 514. Elsevier, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4831-8407-4.50181-4.
Full text"Pervasive Developmental Disorders Screening Test-II (PDDST-II)." In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2215. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_101436.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Denver Developmental Screening Test"
Macht, Madison, Dianna Quan, Brendan J. Clark, Alexander B. Benson, Ellen L. Burnham, and Marc Moss. "Development Of An Efficient Screening Test For Critical Illness Polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM)." In American Thoracic Society 2011 International Conference, May 13-18, 2011 • Denver Colorado. American Thoracic Society, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_meetingabstracts.a2649.
Full textRosyidah, Milatur, Herawati Mansur, and Tri Mardiyanti. "The Difference of Development in Children Aged 6 Months Received Exclusive Breastfeeding Versus Formula Milk in Ciptomulyo Health Center, Malang, East Java." In The 7th International Conference on Public Health 2020. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.26911/the7thicph.03.111.
Full textWeycker, Derek, Peter Boyle, Andrea Lopez, James R. Jett, Frank Detterbeck, Timothy C. Kennedy, Daniel L. Miller, et al. "Cost-Effectiveness Of Screening Older Adult Smokers For Lung Cancer With An Autoantibody Test (AABT)." In American Thoracic Society 2011 International Conference, May 13-18, 2011 • Denver Colorado. American Thoracic Society, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_meetingabstracts.a2937.
Full textLee, Suh young, Soon ho Yoon, Sung yoon Kang, Mi yeong Kim, Min hye Kim, Woo jung Song, Jae woo Jung, et al. "The Differences In Lung Function According To Chronic Sinusitis In Healthy Subjects Who Received Screening Test." In American Thoracic Society 2011 International Conference, May 13-18, 2011 • Denver Colorado. American Thoracic Society, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_meetingabstracts.a1373.
Full textLeung, Chi C., Wing C. Yam, Pak L. Ho, and Cheuk M. Tam. "Evaluation Of The T Spot-TB Test In The Targeted Screening Of Close Contacts Of Smear-Positive Tuberculosis Patients." In American Thoracic Society 2011 International Conference, May 13-18, 2011 • Denver Colorado. American Thoracic Society, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_meetingabstracts.a1186.
Full textLinas, Benjamin P., Angela Y. Wong, Kenneth A. Freedberg, and Charles R. Horsburgh, Jr. "The Cost Effectiveness Of Tuberculin Skin Test And Interferon Gamma Release Assay Screening For Latent Tuberculosis Infection In The U.S." In American Thoracic Society 2011 International Conference, May 13-18, 2011 • Denver Colorado. American Thoracic Society, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_meetingabstracts.a6337.
Full textGonzález Mota, Alba, Marina Covacho González, Isabel Valriberas Herrero, and Carlos Roncero Alonso. "Screening of cannabis use during pregnancy and neonates." In 22° Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Patología Dual (SEPD) 2020. SEPD, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.17579/sepd2020p090.
Full textRudrapatna, Nagaraja, and Benjamin H. Peterson. "Simulation of Combustor Damage Mechanisms and Material System Performance via a Sub-Element Configured Specimen Test." In ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/gt2011-45761.
Full textErickson, Donald C., G. Anand, Riyaz A. Papar, and Jingsong Tang. "Refinery Waste Heat Powered Absorption Refrigeration: Cycle Specification and Design." In ASME 1998 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece1998-0866.
Full textChu, Li-Hui, Elliot Wallace, and Jason Ramirez. "Changes in Late Adolescent Marijuana Use During the COVID-19 Outbreak Vary as a Function of Typical Use." In 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana. Research Society on Marijuana, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.17.
Full textReports on the topic "Denver Developmental Screening Test"
Thorsen, Deborah. A validation study of the screening test for developmental apraxia of speech. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.3311.
Full text