Relevant bibliographies by topics / Diplomatic privileges and immunities

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Diplomatic privileges and immunities'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 28 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Diplomatic privileges and immunities.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Diplomatic privileges and immunities"

1

Okladnaya, Marina, and Yurii Burdai. "Theories of justification of diplomatic privileges and immunities: problems and ways of solution." Law and innovations, no. 4 (32) (December 15, 2020): 74–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2020-4(32)-11.

Full text
Abstract:
Problem setting. The question of the theoretical justification for the existence of a significant number of privilegesand immunities enjoyed by a diplomatic agent has never lost its relevance. This is due to the fact that they are virtuallyunpunished and inviolable in the territory of the host country in the performance of their duties. D. B. Levin also paidattention to problematic issues concerning privileges and immunities. Scholars such as J. Brownie and V. M. Repetskynoted that the list of privileges should be complete given the rapid development of foreign relations between the subjectsof international law, while L. G. Falaleeva, V. V. Marakhovsky and P. M. Prybluda raised the question of unfoundednessof some privileges enjoyed by the diplomatic corps. The purpose of this work is to summarize the theoretical achievements concerning the argumentation of diplomaticprivileges and immunities, their use by members of the family of a diplomatic agent. We will also try to formulateproposals for possible innovations and restrictions on the legal status of the family of a member of the diplomatic corps. Analysis of recent research. At the doctrinal level, theories arguing for the use of diplomatic privileges and immunitiesby members of a diplomatic agent’s family are highly controversial. Among the modern works devoted to thesubstantiation of diplomatic privileges and immunities, it should be noted the works of Yu. G. Demin, D. B. Levin, V. M.Repetsky. Article’s main body. The article presents a detailed analysis of international law and the views of scholars and specialistsin this field, discusses current theoretical and applied issues of the theories of justification of diplomatic privilegesand immunities. Conclusions. After analyzing the theories of substantiation of diplomatic privileges and immunities, we concludedthat their presence is an integral part of the performance of their functions by a diplomatic agent of any rank. The purposeof such benefits and privileges is not to provide the diplomat with an additional opportunity to violate the law, but toensure his smooth exercise of his functions.The responsibility imposed on the accrediting country for acts committed in essence by persons who are not civilservants is too great and unjustified. We have also established that personal inviolability is an important aspect of theunimpeded stay of family members in the host country. But we propose to narrow this privilege, namely to establish arule that would provide for the possibility of criminal prosecution of a family member of a diplomatic agent, which entailsa sanction related to imprisonment in accordance with the national legislation of the host country.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Okladnaya, Marina, and Yurii Burdai. "Theories of justification of diplomatic privileges and immunities: problems and ways of solution." Law and innovations, no. 4 (32) (December 15, 2020): 74–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2020-4(32)-11.

Full text
Abstract:
Problem setting. The question of the theoretical justification for the existence of a significant number of privilegesand immunities enjoyed by a diplomatic agent has never lost its relevance. This is due to the fact that they are virtuallyunpunished and inviolable in the territory of the host country in the performance of their duties. D. B. Levin also paidattention to problematic issues concerning privileges and immunities. Scholars such as J. Brownie and V. M. Repetskynoted that the list of privileges should be complete given the rapid development of foreign relations between the subjectsof international law, while L. G. Falaleeva, V. V. Marakhovsky and P. M. Prybluda raised the question of unfoundednessof some privileges enjoyed by the diplomatic corps. The purpose of this work is to summarize the theoretical achievements concerning the argumentation of diplomaticprivileges and immunities, their use by members of the family of a diplomatic agent. We will also try to formulateproposals for possible innovations and restrictions on the legal status of the family of a member of the diplomatic corps. Analysis of recent research. At the doctrinal level, theories arguing for the use of diplomatic privileges and immunitiesby members of a diplomatic agent’s family are highly controversial. Among the modern works devoted to thesubstantiation of diplomatic privileges and immunities, it should be noted the works of Yu. G. Demin, D. B. Levin, V. M.Repetsky. Article’s main body. The article presents a detailed analysis of international law and the views of scholars and specialistsin this field, discusses current theoretical and applied issues of the theories of justification of diplomatic privilegesand immunities. Conclusions. After analyzing the theories of substantiation of diplomatic privileges and immunities, we concludedthat their presence is an integral part of the performance of their functions by a diplomatic agent of any rank. The purposeof such benefits and privileges is not to provide the diplomat with an additional opportunity to violate the law, but toensure his smooth exercise of his functions.The responsibility imposed on the accrediting country for acts committed in essence by persons who are not civilservants is too great and unjustified. We have also established that personal inviolability is an important aspect of theunimpeded stay of family members in the host country. But we propose to narrow this privilege, namely to establish arule that would provide for the possibility of criminal prosecution of a family member of a diplomatic agent, which entailsa sanction related to imprisonment in accordance with the national legislation of the host country.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Taranenko, M. M., and Ye S. Zolotarova. "DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITIES AND PRIVILEGES." Scientific notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University. Series: Juridical Sciences, no. 1 (2024): 182–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/tnu-2707-0581/2024.1/31.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Nurhartanto, Gregorius Sri. "DIPLOMATIC‌ ‌IMMUNITIES‌ ‌FROM‌ ‌THE‌ ‌PERSPECTIVE‌ ‌OF‌ ‌ CRIMINAL,‌ ‌CIVIL,‌ ‌AND‌ ‌ADMINISTRATIVE‌ ‌JURISDICTIONS‌ ‌ OF‌ ‌THE‌ ‌RECEIVING‌ ‌STATE‌." TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL 5, no. 1 (April 9, 2021): 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v5i1.46220.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractA diplomatic mission is the representative of the sending state in the receiving state to carry out a sacred mission. For supporting the functions, diplomatic missions and diplomatic agents are given privileges and immunities rights. The privileges and immunities rights are not for individual diplomatic agents, but more importantly for the benefit of the mission as a whole. The consequence of having the privileges and immunities rights is the diplomatic missions and diplomatic agents are excluded from the local jurisdiction of the receiving state in the areas of criminal, civil and administrative law. This consequence creates complexity for the receiving country to follow up on diplomatic officials and their families if there is a violation or abuse of diplomatic immunity and privileges. There are some exceptions in world history where diplomatic officials can be followed up by recipient countries which can set a precedent for diplomatic immunity and privileges.AbstrakMisi diplomatik adalah misi resmi negara pengirim di negara penerima yang mengemban misi suci. Guna menunjang kelancaran tugas misi diplomatik maka misi diplomatik dan pejabat diplomatik diberikan hak-hak kekebalan dan keistimewaan. Hak-hak kekebalan dan keistimewaan itu bukan semata-mata untuk diri pejabat diplomatik maupun anggota keluarganya, tetapi yang lebih penting adalah untuk kepentingan misi secara keseluruhan. Konsekuensi dari dimilikinya hak-hak kekebalan dan keistimewaan tersebut adalah misi diplomatik dan pejabat diplomatik beserta anggota keluarganya dikecualikan dari yurisdiksi lokal negara penerima baik di area hukum pidana, perdata maupun acara. Konsekuensi ini mengakibatkan kompleksitas bagi negara penerima untuk menindak lanjuti pejabat diplomatik beserta keluarganya bila terjadi suatu pelanggaran maupun penyalahgunaan kekebalan dan keistimewaan diplomatik tersebut. Terdapat beberapa pengecualian terjadi di dalam sejarah dunia dimana pejabat diplomatik dapat ditindak lanjuti oleh negara penerima yang dapat menjadi preseden terkait kekebalan dan keistimewaan diplomatik.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Allan Abu Samra, Lama. "Diplomatic Agents' Privileges and Immunities." Közigazgatási és Infokommunikációs Jogi PhD Tanulmányok 4, no. 1 (October 31, 2023): 40–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.47272/kikphd.2023.1.3.

Full text
Abstract:
This research examines the extent of diplomatic immunity, specifically in cases where a diplomat commits a criminal offense. This situation raises concerns as it contradicts the fundamental principles upon which diplomatic relations between countries are established, namely, the promotion of economic, social, and cultural ties. The occurrence of such crimes committed by a diplomatic agent undermines the very purpose of fostering these relations. This issue necessitates an investigation into the fundamental characteristics and attributes of diplomatic immunity. It has been observed in global conventions and customary international law that states generally do not relinquish the immunity of their diplomatic representatives, unless the diplomat engages in a non-task-related criminal act, thereby permitting prosecution within the host state's jurisdiction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Nagieva, A. A., and A. E. Samadova. "The history of the formation and development of the institution of diplomatic immunities and privileges in the United States." Law Enforcement Review 7, no. 2 (June 22, 2023): 16–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(2).16-26.

Full text
Abstract:
The subject of study. Throughout the historical period of the development of diplomatic law, an institution of immunities and privileges was formed, the content and scope of which were determined by the level of diplomatic relations between states and the development of public administration.The rules of national law also have a significant impact on the procedure for exercising dip- lomatic immunities and privileges. Many states have adopted legal acts regulating the foun- dations of the diplomatic service. For example, in the United States, after joining the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961, the Law on Diplomatic Relations of 1978 was adopted, based on the rules of this Convention.The article examines the history and development of diplomatic immunities and privileges, the formation of the US diplomatic service and the content of current national laws in the US. The purpose of the study is the identification of problems in the practice of implementing diplomatic immunities and substantiate the hypothesis that it is necessary to develop the legislation on diplomatic immunities and the diplomatic service in the United States.The methodology of the study. The methodology of the study includes general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, description, systematization) and special scientific methods (formal legal and comparative legal methods). In addition to this, historical method was also applicable.The main results. Based on the results of the study, were disclosed significant discrepancies between the national legal regulation of the US diplomatic service and the rules of interna- tional law, which leads to massive violations of diplomatic immunities and privileges by the US authorities.Conclusions. Diplomatic immunity is a guarantor of the effective operation of foreign rela- tions bodies on the territory of the host state, however, in practice, there are often cases of their violation by the authorities of the host state and cases of abuse of diplomatic im- munities and privileges by their carriers. The granting of a special legal status, personal in- violability and other privileges and immunities is in no way equated to absolute impunity for employees of foreign relations bodies in case they commit illegal acts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Abusamra, Lama Allan. "Diplomatic Representatives, Missions, and Consulates." EU agrarian Law 13, no. 1 (June 1, 2024): 28–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/eual-2024-0004.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This paper discusses the intricacies of diplomatic privileges and immunities as outlined in the Vienna Convention. It highlights the distinction between privileges granted to representatives of states versus those of international organizations. The classification of diplomatic staff into four categories is explained, emphasizing the inviolability and immunity of diplomatic agents. Changes in definitions and practices since 1958 are explored, along with the importance of proper notification and certification of diplomatic status. The roles of heads of missions, particularly the doyen of the diplomatic corps, are outlined, as well as the significance of acceptance or rejection of diplomatic representatives by receiving states. The article concludes with insights into the termination of diplomatic missions and the authority of states to impose conditions on diplomatic privileges and immunities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Nikolova-Marković, Aleksandra, and Vesna Baltezarević. "The abuse of diplomatic immunity and privileges as a modern security-diplomatic challenge." Megatrend revija 17, no. 4 (2020): 7–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/megrev2004007n.

Full text
Abstract:
In this scientific paper is made an analysis of the abuse of diplomatic immunities and privileges as a modern security-diplomatic challenge that needs to be overcome. The method of analysis, the historical method and the inductive-deductive method are used. It was concluded that the abuse of diplomatic immunities and privileges is a problem that dates back a long time and since the distant 1980s, there have been initiatives to change the Vienna Conventions related with the abuse of diplomatic immunities and privileges. Unfortunately, such serious changes have not taken place and therefore this security risk is still present in the practice of countries around the world and there are more and more examples of the practice where diplomats serve individual interests driven by socio-destructive or political intentions instead of institutional and state goals. Thereby, there is a violation of the principles of diplomatic work and the spread of the danger regarding the secure future of the citizens and institutions in the recipient countries.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

ABUJANAH, Anwer Mohamed Ahmed. "IMMUNITIES AND PRIVILEGES OF A DIPLOMATIC ENVOY." International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research 04, no. 01 (December 1, 2022): 147–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.12.11.

Full text
Abstract:
International diplomatic relations represent one of the greatest manifestations of independence and national sovereignty. This requires each autonomous state to establish various relationships with other countries. This leads, subsequently, to exchanges of ambassadors to manage foreign affairs. It is of prime importance to highlight the significance of the preponderant role played by diplomatic representations in the development of international relations. This consequently justifies the privilege and the great assurance granted by States to representatives, and allows them to be more efficient in their representation. This is why all States must ensure that the conditions of diplomatic agents are maintained, their rights are respected, as well as any act of deviation and violation of their assurances. This study therefore proposes to highlight the concept of diplomatic immunity, with its various types and contexts, as an essential element in the practice of this profession. It also aims to make explicit the regulations of the diplomatic system and the legal nature of the privileges granted to ambassadors. Following the various changes recently produced in the international political arena, we consider it necessary to understand the challenges in the field and to study in as much detail as possible the security and guarantees possessed by the diplomatic agent. This study is subdivided into four parts: We will first attempt to define the concept of diplomatic immunity, And we explain, in a second place, the course and the historical development of the latter. While the third part of the study, will be devoted to the explanation of the legal bases being at the origin of this immunity. Finally, the fourth part will include the study of the various types of diplomatic immunity and their different manifestations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Saleh Bani Issa, Mohammad, Omar Hamdan Hadrami, and Enas Baher Dabbas. "Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities between Internal law and International Law (Comparative Study)." Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences 50, no. 2 (March 30, 2023): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i2.4916.

Full text
Abstract:
Objectives: The study aimed, through an understanding of diplomatic immunities and privileges in the context of the relationship between domestic law and international law, to explain the commitment of states to international law in order to achieve their interests, which is not considered an encroachment on the sovereignty of the state. Methods: The study used the legal, systems and comparative methods to answer the questions and test the hypothesis, on the basis that the hypothesis says that there is a correlation between diplomatic immunities and privileges and sovereignty. Results: The study showed that the international immunities and privileges occupy one of the most important advanced position for the existing lawsuits between the Juridical, legal political disputes, and the social and serenity importance. Many studies and elaborations have addressed this issue and introduced different theories, that creates packages of legal disputes on the background of the sovereignty concepts,security, stability and independence from one side, and on the other side, the states international obligations, and its interest to live peacefully and cooperating with other countries. Conclusion: The study concluded that immunizing the diplomatic envoy from judicial accountability and exempting him from sanctions is the basis of diplomatic immunities and privileges. The issue the state gives up some of its sovereignty becomes a matter of interest and scrutiny. Therefore, international law hastened in light of the growing relations to explain these immunities and privileges and assign them to Legal grounds agreed upon by states that require more cooperation and disregard for absolute sovereignty.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Diplomatic privileges and immunities"

1

Moutzouris, Maria. "Sending and receiving: immunity sought by diplomats committing criminal offences." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003201.

Full text
Abstract:
Diplomatic immunity is one of the oldest elements of foreign relations, dating back as far as Ancient Greece and Rome. Today, it is a principle that has been codified into the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations regulating past customs and practices. Consuls and international organizations, although their privileges and immunities are similar to diplomatic personnel, do differ and are regulated by the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the United Nations International Immunities respectively. These Conventions have been influenced by past practices and by three theories during different era’s namely exterritoriality, personal representation and functional necessity. The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations further provides certain immunities and privileges to different levels of diplomatic officials, their staff and families. Privileges and immunities will be considered under various main categories, namely the diplomatic mission, the diplomatic official, diplomatic staff, and families. Each category receives privileges and immunities, for example immunities enjoyed by the diplomatic mission include mission correspondence and bags. Diplomatic officials enjoy personal inviolability, immunity from jurisdiction and inviolability of diplomats’ residences and property. The staff and families of diplomatic officials too enjoy privileges and immunities. The problem of so many people receiving privileges and immunities is that there is a high likelihood of abuse. Abuses that arise are various crimes committed by diplomats, their staff and families. They are immune from local punishment and appear to be above the local law. Although the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations provides remedies against diplomats, staff and families who abuse their position, it gives the impression that it is not enough. Various Acts in the United Kingdom, United States and the Republic of South Africa will be analysed in order to ascertain what governments have done to try and curb diplomatic abuses. Each will be considered and found that although they have restricted immunity from previous practices it still places the diplomats’ needs above its own citizens. Thus several suggestions have been put forward and argued whether they are successful in restricting immunity comprehensively. Such suggestions are amending the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations; using the functional necessity theory to further limit immunity; forming bilateral treaties between States as a possible means to restrict or limit; and lastly establishing a Permanent International Diplomatic Criminal Court. The key question to be answered is whether diplomatic immunity is needed for the efficient functioning of foreign relations between States.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

McNicol, Suzanne B. "The law of privilege : a critical analysis." Monash University, Faculty of Law, 2001. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/9060.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Shi, Xinxiang. "Diplomatic immunities ratione materiae under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations : towards a coherent interpretation." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/33152.

Full text
Abstract:
Rules of diplomatic immunity, which nowadays are enshrined in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, play an important role in interstate diplomacy because they ensure the efficient performance of diplomatic functions. This thesis investigates a particular form of diplomatic immunity - diplomatic immunity ratione materiae. Unlike diplomatic immunity ratione personae, which pertains to the personal status of a diplomatic agent, diplomatic immunity ratione materiae depends in essence on the official nature of a particular act In practice, however, the determination of diplomatic immunity ratione materiae may meet with many conceptual and practical difficulties. For one, it is not always easy to distinguish the official acts of a diplomatic agent, who represents the sending State in the receiving State, from his or her private acts. In case of disagreement between the two States, questions may also arise as to who has the authority to make a final determination. The Vienna Convention does not offer much guidance on these issues; on the contrary, the Convention complicates them by employing, without adequate explanation, distinct formulas for different kinds of diplomatic immunity ratione materiae. This thesis examines these formulas in detail. On a general level, it is submitted that diplomatic immunity ratione materiae for certain types of activity constitutes not only a procedural bar to court proceedings but also a substantive exemption of individual responsibility. More specifically, it is argued that each formula must be understood in the light of the rationale behind immunity, the type of immunity concerned, and the specific functions or duties performed. In case of controversy, weight should be given to the opinion of the sending State, although the authority to make a decision lies ultimately with the court of the receiving State.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Simbeye, Yitiha M. Z. "The erosion of sovereign and diplomatic immunities under international criminal law." Thesis, University of Reading, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.405479.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

MacCormack, Alan. "The term "privilege" : a textual study of its meaning and use in the 1983 code of canon law /." Roma : Ed. Pontificia Univ. Gregoriana, 1997. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/279626304.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kim, Hyŏk. "Chosŏn sidae wanmun e kwanhan yŏnʼgu." [Kyŏngggi-do Sŏngnam-si] : Hanʼgukhak Chungang Yŏnʼguwŏn, 2005. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/309366052.html.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Soule, Warren Becket. "Clerical immunity and the Becket dispute two decretist traditions /." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1991. http://www.tren.com.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Churches, Steven C. "An historical survey of the presumption in the common law that general statutes do not bind the Crown /." Title page, contents and abstract only, 1988. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09PH/09phc562.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

McCoy, Gerard John Xavier. "Uxorial privileges in substantive criminal law: a comparative law enquiry." University of Canterbury. School of Law, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/3674.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis investigates three exemplars of uxorial substantive privileges in the criminal law: the marital coercion doctrine, the intraspousal conspiracy exemption, and the uxorial post-offence accessorial immunity. Their history, choreography and variations are comparatively investigated across the common law jurisdictions including the impact of statutory interventions. The principal argument is that the judicial and legislative treatment of these uxorial privileges has been inconsistent or erratic so that they are not the products of any systematic, modern development in the criminal law. This thesis proposes that there is no justification for their continued retention in common law legal systems. Archival, Parliamentary, and other sources have been used to identify the factors impinging upon the creation of specific statutory uxorial privileges. The diaspora of these laws throughout the other common law jurisdictions is investigated. The discussion is illustrated by examination of the particular issues raised by polygamy, customary law concubinage as well as by gender-reassignment. This thesis examines whether both gender-specific and marriage-specific criteria are valid constituents within the parameters of substantive criminal law. It traces the genesis of these special defences within the criminal law available exclusively to women, from the time of King Ine of the West Saxons c712, to examine the current status of such laws throughout common law jurisdictions. The investigation explores factors shaping the creation of a statutory defence of marital coercion by the British Parliament in 1925 and outlines the challenges generated by that law and its extraordinary resilience. This thesis demonstrates the failure of the criminal law to provide an overarching construct to implement emergent gender equality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

鮑子健. "澳門立法議員刑事豁免制度比較研究 =A comparative study about the criminal immunity system of the members of the Legislative Assembly of Macau." Thesis, University of Macau, 2018. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b3951550.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Diplomatic privileges and immunities"

1

Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ed. Chart of diplomatic and consular immunities. [Washington, D.C.]: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Roosevelt, Selwa. Diplomatic immunity and U.S. interests. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of State, Bureau of Public Affairs, Office of Public Communication, Editorial Division, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Denza, Eileen. Diplomatic law: A commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Frey, Linda. The history of diplomatic immunity. Columbus [Ohio]: Ohio State University Press, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lewis, Charles J. State and diplomatic immunity. 3rd ed. London: Lloyd's of London Press, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Carter, Jonathan G. Diplomatic immunity: Privileges and abuses. Hauppauge, N.Y: Nova Science Publisher's, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Żebrowski, Andrzej. Przywileje i immunitety dyplomatyczne i konsularne podczas konfliktu zbrojnego. Warszawa: Wydawn. Profesjonalnej Szkoły Biznesu, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ulkoasiainministeriö, Finland. Diplomatic privileges and immunities in Finland: A guide for foreign missions. Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Division, Tanzania Protocol, ed. A guide on diplomatic privileges and immunities in the United Republic of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: The Republic, Protocol Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Co-operation, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Burian, Alexandru. Drept diplomatic și consular. Chișinău: ARC, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Diplomatic privileges and immunities"

1

Misra, Siddhartha, and Arjun Anand. "Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities." In Indian Practice of International Law, 101–17. London: Routledge India, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003366331-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kumari, Leena, and Anupam Jha. "Privileges and Immunities of Diplomats and Consuls: South Asian Perspective." In Shifting Horizons of Public International Law, 313–33. New Delhi: Springer India, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3724-2_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Worster, William Thomas. "Privileges and immunities." In Cases and Materials on the Law of International Organizations, 308–68. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Identifiers: LCCN 2020014963 | ISBN 9781138056640 (hardback) | ISBN 9781138056664 (paperback) | ISBN 9781315165189 (ebook): Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315165189-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Janig, Philipp, and August Reinisch. "Diplomatic Immunities in Austrian Courts." In Diplomatic Immunity, 79–97. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1094-6_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Droesse, Gerd. "Membership and Privileges and Immunities." In Membership in International Organizations, 315–60. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-327-6_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hofstadter, Cami Green. "A Touch of Privileges and Immunities." In Modern Consuls, Local Communities and Globalization, 63–71. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42802-0_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Bankas, Ernest K. "The Privileges and Immunities of States." In The State Immunity Controversy in International Law, 75–113. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64043-2_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Abeyratne, Ruwantissa. "Article 60 Immunities and Privileges of Personnel." In Convention on International Civil Aviation, 595. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00068-8_61.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities." In Diplomatic Handbook, 35–44. Brill | Nijhoff, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789047414339_008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Eileen, Denza. "Privileges and Immunities of Diplomatic Agents." In Satow's Diplomatic Practice, 8th Edition. Oxford University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780192859594.003.0013.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter elaborates on the privileges and immunities of diplomatic agents. It explains the distinction between privileges and immunities. Although a diplomat’s immunity from jurisdiction does not imply any exemption from liability, special provision is sometimes made in local law to provide that diplomats shall be exempt from certain obligations. Meanwhile, the privileges of diplomatic agents include nationality and several exemptions from several factors like taxation and customs duties. The chapter then considers Article 40 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR) providing an approach concerning a diplomatic agent passing through a third State to or from his post.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Diplomatic privileges and immunities"

1

SIMONE, Pierluigi. "THE RECASTING OF THE OTTOMAN PUBLIC DEBT AND THE ABOLITION OF THE CAPITULATIONS REGIME IN THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ACTION OF TURKEY LED BY MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK." In 9. Uluslararası Atatürk Kongresi. Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Yayınları, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51824/978-975-17-4794-5.64.

Full text
Abstract:
The recast of the international debt contracted by the former Ottoman Empire and the overcoming of the capitulations regime that had afflicted Turkey for centuries, are two of the most relevant sectors in which the political and diplomatic action promoted by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk has been expressed. Extremely relevant in this regard are the different disciplines established, respectively, by the Treaty of Sèvres in 1920 and then by the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923. After the Ottoman Government defaulted in 1875, an agreement (the Decree of Muharrem) was concluded in 1881 between the Ottoman Government and representatives of its foreign and domestic creditors for the resumption of payments on Ottoman bonds, and a European control of a part of the Imperial revenues was instituted through the Administration of the Ottoman Public Debt. At the same time, the Ottoman Empire was burdened by capitulations, conferring rights and privileges in favour of their subjects resident or trading in the Ottoman lands, following the policy towards European States of the Byzantine Empire. According to these capitulations, traders entering the Ottoman Empire were exempt from local prosecution, local taxation, local conscription, and the searching of their domicile. The capitulations were initially made during the Ottoman Empire’s military dominance, to entice and encourage commercial exchanges with Western merchants. However, after dominance shifted to Europe, significant economic and political advantages were granted to the European Powers by the Ottoman Empire. Both regimes, substantially maintained by the Treaty of Sèvres, were considered unacceptable by the Nationalist Movement led by Mustafa Kemal and therefore became the subject of negotiations during the Conference of Lausanne. The definitive overcoming of both of them, therefore represents one of the most evident examples of the reacquisition of the full sovereignty of the Republic of Turkey.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Diplomatic privileges and immunities' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography