Academic literature on the topic 'Diplomatic protocol'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Diplomatic protocol.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Diplomatic protocol"
1
Sánchez González, Dolores del Mar. "PROTOCOLO Y DERECHO: JURIDICIDAD DEL PROTOCOLO PROTOCOL AND LAW: THE LEGALITY OF THE PROTOCOL." REVISTA ESTUDIOS INSTITUCIONALES 5, no. 8 (July 26, 2018): 215. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/eeii.vol.5.n.8.2018.22186.
Full textAbstract:
Entre las ciencias jurídicas, el protocolo se concibe como buenas maneras, educación, código de conducta, ética, o como la ropa o los zapatos que uno debe ponerse para acudir a un acto que exige una determinada etiqueta. Como algo frívolo, sin importancia, que no atañe al común de la sociedad, propio de las clases elevadas y de los gobernantes y de la diplomacia. Por supuesto, cuando dices que eres protocolista, que eres especialista en protocolo y que te dedicas a investigar el protocolo, te preguntan "pero ¿eso es derecho?". En definitiva el protocolo es una disciplina despreciada por los juristas que la han ido dejando de lado, salvó en un sector: el diplomático. Los diplomáticos son los únicos conscientes de lo importante que es el ceremonial y el protocolo en las relaciones internacionales, y por ello los cursos de la Escuela Diplomática son referente ineludible a la hora de estudiar protocolo. Este estudio reivindica el protocolo desde su carácter de disciplina jurídica.______________________Among the legal sciences, protocol is considered to be good manners, courtesy, code of conduct, ethics, or the clothes and shoes one should wear to an event where dress code is required; something superficial, unimportant, not related to society at large, characteristic of the upper classes, rulers and diplomacy. Of course, when you say you are a protocol expert and that you do research in protocol, you will be asked “Is that law?” Ultimately, protocol is a discipline despised by jurists, who have gradually set it aside, with the exception of the diplomatic community. Diplomats are well aware of the importance of ceremonial and protocol in the international relations, and thus the Diplomatic School courses are essential when studying protocol. This study claims the protocol as a legal discipline.
2
Toshpulatov, Sherzod Shukurovich. "Diplomatic Protocol: Theoretical And Legal Approaches To Its Study." American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology 03, no. 08 (August 25, 2021): 55–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/volume03issue08-10.
Full textAbstract:
The article illustrates the fundamental aspects of studies of diplomatic protocol from different perspectives and makes an effort to review its characteristics by relying on political or geographical positions of states. The article also defines the diplomatic protocol and what appeals to it by analyzing its theoretical and legal bases as well as presenting examples of documents used among members of the diplomatic corps. Considering the main features, the article makes a conclusion on the unique nature of the diplomatic protocol.
3
Gherasim, Gabriel C. "Fundamentals of Diplomatic Protocol." Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea 64, no. 2 (December 30, 2019): 359–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2019.2.17.
Full text
4
Berg, Chris. "What Diplomacy in the Ancient Near East Can Tell Us About Blockchain Technology." Ledger 2 (December 18, 2017): 55–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2017.104.
Full textAbstract:
A blockchain is an institutional technology—a protocol—that allows for economic coordination between agents separated by boundaries of possible mistrust. Blockchains are not the only technology in history to have these characteristics. The paper looks at the role of the diplomatic protocol at the very beginning of human civilisation in the ancient near east. These two protocols—diplomatic and blockchain—have significant similarities. They were created to address to similar economic problems using similar mechanisms: a permanent record of past dealings, public and ritualistic verification of transactions, and game-theoretic mechanisms of reciprocity. The development of the diplomatic protocol allowed for the creation of the first international community and facilitated patterns of peaceful trade and exchange. Some questions about a generalised ‘protocol economics’ are drawn.
5
Okladnaya, Marina, and Viktoriya Slivnaya. "Protocol of credentials in European countries: general and special." Law and innovative society, no. 2 (15) (January 4, 2020): 28–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2020-2(15)-5.
Full textAbstract:
Problem setting. The purpose of establishing diplomatic relations is to maintain constant relations between the countries at the highest diplomatic level. The main stages of establishing diplomatic relations are regulated by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961. At the same time, this document in many respects refers to the national law of countries. The presentation of credentials is the final action, after which diplomatic relations are considered established, and the powers of state representatives take effect. However, international law does not specify the specific form and procedure for the presentation of credentials, as it is up to the States to decide. Therefore, each state has its own practice of the presentation of credentials, which depends on its form of government, national characteristics, historical past. Therefore, it is relevant today to compare the protocols of credentials in the practice of different countries to determine the positive and negative aspects. Target research. The aim of the work is to determine the main content of credentials in the process of establishing diplomatic relations, to study the practice of ceremonies of credentials on the example of Europe and Ukraine, to analyze existing problems in this area of international relations and solutions. Analysis of recent research and publication. This topic is the basis of research in many works of recognized authors. Examples are theoretical works Sagaidak O.P. «Diplomatic protocol and etiquette», Tkacha D.I. «Diplomatic protocol in the Republic of Hungary: general, special», Tymoshenko N.L. «Features of diplomatic, business protocol and etiquette of the Netherlands», and other Ukrainian scholars. Also well-known works of foreign authors are the works of Ikanovich S. and Picarsky J. «Diplomatic Protocol and Good Manners», John Wood and Jean Serre «Diplomatic Ceremony and Protocol», Bennett Carol «Business Etiquette and Protocol». Article’s main body. The establishment of diplomatic relations is aimed at the exchange of diplomatic missions between states. This process ends with the procedure of presenting credentials. Credentials are a document that officially certifies the status of a diplomatic representative of the accrediting state in the host state. This document is important in international law because it has a long history and represents the beginning of the official activities of the ambassador to the host country. Modern elements of the procedure of awarding credentials are common to many states. But each country today has its own characteristics of the ceremony of awarding credentials, which usually depends on its form of government. For example, monarchies (Netherlands, England) still have in their practice a lavish and pathetic conduct of diplomatic events. In contrast, іn today’s democracies (Hungary) the protocol of credentials is more modern and simplified due to the absence of outdated traditions and irrelevant measures. However, each country has both positive and negative aspects of the ceremony. Ukraine has little experience in diplomatic protocol since gaining independence in 1991. Today, national law effectively regulates the procedure for awarding credentials, but many provisions do not correspond to reality. Therefore, Ukraine must develop in this area of international relations on the basis of foreign experience. Conclusions and prospect of development. Thus, the presentation of credentials plays an important role in regulating diplomatic relations between countries. The basis for this ceremony is the characteristics of the state, which includes the political regime, form of government, historical past, modern development, features of the national mentality. In our opinion, the process of universalization of the diplomatic protocol is a variant of development of this field of international relations. The appropriate direction of such development may be the unification of norms relating to the ceremony of awarding credentials, as international law is being actively improved and updated, as exemplified by European integration. As modern Ukraine continues to actively establish diplomatic relations with other countries and exchange diplomatic missions, it is necessary to streamline legislation and develop it on the example of the positive experience of European countries.
6
Grebliauskienė, Beata, and Mariana Sueldo. "Diplomatinio protokolo kaita: instrumentinis požiūris." Informacijos mokslai 52 (January 1, 2010): 96–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/im.2010.0.3192.
Full textAbstract:
Straipsnyje diplomatinio protokolo kaita nagrinėjama ir vertinama iš instrumentalistinių pozicijų, diplomatinį protokolą traktuojant kaip tam tikrą apibrėžtas funkcijas atliekantį instrumentą. Protokolo ir etiketo atliekamos funkcijos kito dėl esminių aplinkos pasikeitimų skirtingais laikotarpiais, dėl to kito ir pats etiketas bei protokolas kaip instrumentas.Monarchinėje Europoje diplomatinis protokolas atliko tris funkcijas: galios palaikymo, elito apibrėžimo ir komunikacinio neapibrėžtumo mažinimo. Modernizmo laikotarpiu diplomatinis protokolas išlaikė elito apibrėžimo ir komunikacinio neapibrėžtumo mažinimo funkcijas, o praradęs galios palaikymo funkciją, patapo veiksmingos komunikacijos, elgesio lankstumo ir manevrų laisvės užtikrinimo įrankiu. Dabar elito apibrėžimo funkcija transformavosi į tarpusavio pagarbos ir pripažinimo funkciją, o likusios dvi mažai tepakito. Kinta ir veiksmingos komunikacijos užtikrinimo funkcija. Standartizuoto elgesio, kaip būtino vieno bendro vardiklio, apimtis mažėja, jis užleidžia vietą postmodernistinei komunikacinių pranešimų formų ir interpretacijos įvairovei, o tai sukuria erdvę naujam neapibrėžtumui atsirasti.Protokolas kaip instrumentas, prisitaikydamas prie kintamų aplinkos sąlygų, keičia atliekamas funkcijas. Kintama aplinka iš instrumento reikalauja kitokių funkcijų, o toms funkcijoms atlikti reikia atitinkamai pasikeitusio instrumento. Kintamos aplinkos nulemta diplomatinio protokolo funkcijų kaita lemia jo kaip instrumento paprastėjimą ir lankstumo didėjimą.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: diplomatinis protokolas, diplomatinio protokolo funkcijos, diplomatinio protokolo kaita.Instrumentalistic Approach to Diplomatic Protocol DevelopmentBeata Grebliauskienė, Mariana Sueldo SummaryThis paper presents an analysis of the development of diplomatic protocol with an instrumentalistic approach, considering protocol as an instrument which performs clearly defined functions. Diplomatic protocol as an instrument has undergone changes determined by the transformations in the development of its functions. Then these functions have also changed together with the essential changes that occurred in their milieu in certain periods of time. In monarchical Europe, diplomatic protocol performed three functions: power keeping, elite definition and uncertainty reduction. In the modern times, diplomatic protocol has maintained the latter two and lost its power-keeping function, but it acquired two other functions serving as a guarantor of effective communication, behavior flexibility and maneuvering freedom. At present, diplomatic protocol no longer serves the purpose of defining the elite but has rather become a tool to express mutual respect and acknowledgment. Two of the former functions do not show obvious changes, whereas some transformation can be perceived regarding effective communication. The scope of the essential common denominator diminishes, giving way to postmodernist variety of signalling/message forms and interpretations, thus creating a gap for the re-appearance of uncertainty.Diplomatic protocol as an instrument adjusts to the transforming conditions of the environment by changing the functions it performs. Subsequently, the changes that occurred in the milieu where diplomatic protocol performs its functions demand that the instrument itself be adjusted in order to perform new or transformed functions as appropriate. The development of diplomatic protocol as hereby presented determines its simplification and increased flexibility as an instrument.
7
Yair, Gad, and Sharona Odom-Weiss. "Israeli Diplomacy: The Effects of Cultural Trauma." Hague Journal of Diplomacy 9, no. 1 (2014): 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-12341269.
Full textAbstract:
Summary Israeli politicians are diplomatic agents provocateurs. Presidents, prime ministers and foreign office executives craft diplomatic scenes that betray diplomatic protocol. This article exposes the deep cultural codes that explain the unique behaviour of Israeli diplomacy. It documents different occasions of Israeli exceptional diplomacy and suggests that they reflect the cultural traumas that underlie Israeli culture. The analyses apply a new theoretical framework that dwells on the cultural codes of ‘Israeliness’ while suggesting that the unique style of Israeli diplomacy reflects four such codes: existential anxiety; upright defiance; a dugri (frank) speech culture and a fear of seeming to be a sucker (‘fraier’). By interpreting prominent cases with a cultural lens, the authors provide new insights into Israeli unilateralism, its seeming ‘paranoid’ character, and the reason for Israeli ignorance of international diplomatic codes. Essentially, they suggest that: (a) there is a cultural mismatch between diplomatic protocol and the Israeli national habitus; (b) the more that Israel’s strategic interests are threatened, the more locked it becomes to its post-traumatic habitus and the further its politicians move away from protocol. Israel’s persistent cultural trauma is thus likely to maintain the deviation of Israeli diplomacy from diplomatic protocol.
8
Nagieva, A. A., and F. Sh Larina. "INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE DIPLOMATIC PROTOCOL." Moscow Journal of International Law, no. 1 (2018): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-1-79-88.
Full text
9
Grebliauskienė, Beata, and Mariana Sueldo. "Diplomatinio protokolo kaitai įtaką darantys veiksniai: komunikacinis aspektas." Informacijos mokslai 46 (January 1, 2008): 127–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/im.2008.0.3352.
Full textAbstract:
Straipsnyje analizuojamas diplomatinis protokolas ir jo kaita komunikaciniu aspektu. Traktuojant protokolą kaip komunikacijos sklandumo ir efektyvumo užtikrinimo priemonę, tiriamos specifinių protokolo bruožų atsiradimo aplinkybės bei priežastys, atskleidžiami diplomatinio protokolo klostymuisi bei raidai įtaką darę veiksniai. Diplomatinis protokolas kaip komunikacijos proceso dalis analizuojamas keliais aspektais: komunikacijos proceso dalyvių tikslai, proceso dalyvių komunikaciniai gebėjimai ir vis daugėjimas šių dalyvių bei komunikacijos intensyvėjimas. Aptariami diplomatinės komunikacijos besikeičiantys tikslai pereinant nuo neapibrėžtumo vengimo iki siekio įtikinti. Atkreipiamas dėmesys į protokolui būdingą, tačiau nesavitikslį neverbalikos formų vartojimą, ritualų ir ceremonijų gausą nuo viduramžių iki mūsų dienų.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: diplomatinis protokolas, komunikacijos procesas, diplomatinio protokolo kaita, veiksniai.The influence factors in the development of diplomatic protokol: communicative perspectiveMariana Sueldo, Beata Grebliauskienė SummaryThis paper provides an analysis of diplomatic protocol as part of the communication process, more specifically as a code of communication and the factors which have mostly influenced its development. Protocol being understood as a means to ensure effective and clear communication, the circumstances and reasons for the emergence of protocol are discussed. Three main aspects of protocol as a communication code are here considered as the most significant, namely: the participants in the diplomatic communication process and their aims, the communication abilities of individuals taking part in such situations, and the gradually and historically changing number of the participants involved in the diplomatic communication process, as well as the intensity of communication. This article unveils these three factors within the area of communication, focusing respectively on each of them, starting with an overview of ritualized and rule-base interpersonal communication as a means to reduce uncertainty. Then diplomatic communication as a persuasive tool is analysed as a ruled self-expression within a purposefully created context, where the participants seek individual goals. Then follows a brief analysis of the changing communication goals, ranging from the avoidance of uncertainty to the seek of persuassion. Attention is drawn to the frequent use of non-verbal communication forms, rituals and ceremonies as an integral component of protocol, from its emergence in the Middle Ages till our times.span>
10
Wiśniewski, Szymon. "Ewolucja chińskiego protokołu i zwyczajowego prawa dyplomatycznego od XVI do XIX w." Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej, no. 18 (2020): 151–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/23538724gs.20.042.12879.
Full textAbstract:
The evolution of Chinese protocol and customary diplomatic law in contacts with European countries from the 16th to the 19th centuries From the earliest times, diplomatic protocol has been one of the most important instruments of foreign policy. It facilitates establishing relationships in the international arena by creating a common language of communication. The aim of diplomatic protocol is to create an atmosphere of respect, recognition, and harmony in international relations. To a large extent, it is the result of customary international law, which consists of two basic elements. Firstly, one comes from the practice of states, viewed objectively, and secondly, from opinio iuris, i.e. the subjective feeling that this procedure is a kind of law. For many centuries, the Chinese Empire used these two tools to conduct foreign policy, in particular with European countries with which relations were not based on the principle of equality and respect for sovereignty. The purpose of this article is to indicate how China used protocol and customary diplomatic law to achieve its goals in the international arena.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Diplomatic protocol"
1
Lukovicsová, Nicola. "The history of diplomatic protocol with the emphasis on French influence on diplomatic protocol and new cultural influences on today´s diplomatic protocol." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2014. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-193888.
Full textAbstract:
The Master's Thesis on "The History of Diplomatic Protocol with the Emphasis on French Influence on Diplomatic Protocol and New Cultural Influences on Today's Diplomatic Protocol" aims at introducing the topic of History of Diplomatic protocol and is further elaborating on the topic in terms of various influences on Diplomacy and Diplomatic protocol. The purpose was to show that the evolution of the practices, protocols and etiquette is a gradual process of change. Nowadays we live in the world strongly influenced by the European tradition that mainly comes from France. However, the changing world and process of globalization makes it easier for people to interact, share their values and spread their ideas.
2
Gullová, Soňa. "Společenská etiketa, obchodní a diplomatický protokol." Doctoral thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2005. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-77056.
Full textAbstract:
The goal of this Thesis is to uncover, characterize, analyze, describe and define selected contemporary rules of etiquette, international business and diplomatic protocol in international business and diplomatic practice and point out the greatest deficiencies witnessed in practice. The research subject of this Thesis is, thus, the formal aspect of international business and diplomatic cooperation. Its output consists of recommendation on how to correctly apply these rules in practice. I would also like my paper to significantly contribute to the general knowledge of this fascinating and commonly useful knowledge. The structure of the Thesis as it was drawn up in context of its goals consists of three main chapters, introduction and conclusion. The first part of the Thesis deals with Social Etiquette. This part is not conceived as general rules of social intercourse. Instead, it concentrates mainly on the elaboration of contemporary general rules of social intercourse and etiquette to in the context of business and entrepreneurial activities, i.e. Business Protocol. The Thesis would also like to provide answers to the following questions: What is the current standard of social intercourse in the Czech Republic? What are the contemporary rules of social intercourse in the Czech Republic and how do they differ from the etiquette abroad? Can we claim that these rules are being observed? What leads our managers, businessman, diplomats etc. to observing these rules? In my Thesis I strive to evaluate contemporary rules applicable to social, business and diplomatic events as well as in written communication and to draw attention the lack of their knowledge. Another partial goal of the Thesis consists of using carried out analyses, evaluations, inquiries via questionnaires and comparative analyses to point out the differences in the rules of social intercourse, conduct and negotiation in different territories. The working hypothesis of this part of the paper is to indicate on the basis of the above mentioned allegations the relationship between the behaviour and conduct of managers of different provenience and the fact that they have different cultural background. Culture is learned not inherited. It is derived from the social environment not from genes and it must be clearly distinguished from human character and the character of individual people. Significant attention is, therefore, paid to the study of international customs and conventions, especially those of the countries which the representatives of Czech firms, enterprises and institutions most come into contact with. The presented Thesis does not have the ambition to come up with a definitive cookbook as to how to conduct oneself in a given situation within a given territory; it merely strives to point out the pitfalls, misunderstandings and blunders in conduct and barriers in communication and in business or any other professional negotiations. Unlike legal acts the rules of Etiquette are not binding. Laws apply to all and the state prosecutes their infringement. Unlike laws, the rules of Etiquette are not enforceable. Their only form of enforcement is the social pressure which the society effectuates on the individual. Thus, the standards of social conduct only apply to those willing to abide by them. The presented paper is an aggregate of the rules and its author's views. Another author's standpoint may differ. The second part of the Thesis concentrates on the sphere of Diplomatic Protocol in international business and diplomatic practice. The presented paper aims at describing the existing system of Foreign Service and diplomatic activities, presenting the diplomatic representations, consulates, missions and other representatives abroad, their functioning as well as their immunities and privileges. Diplomatic Protocol concerns the formal, not the material, content of international relations. Formal rules of social conduct in intercourse with diplomatic representatives of other countries, the etiquette and the ceremonies applied to the intercourse with these representatives form an integral part of the Diplomatic Protocol. In the initial part I define the very term Diplomatic Protocol and I strive to specify is subject. Successively I address individual respective parts of Diplomatic Protocol and diplomatic practice, such as the methods of establishing diplomatic relationships, the roles of diplomatic missions, ranks of diplomatic representatives and their immunities and privileges, the procedure related to the conferment of agrément and the termination of activity of the head of a diplomatic mission, official visits of foreign guests, organisation of international conferences, diplomatic correspondence, consular activities etc. In the course of its elaboration the presented Thesis should also offer answers to the following questions: What is the current international form, role and significance of the Diplomatic Protocol? What leads states to observing signed conventions? Which diplomatic immunities and privileges are at the moment among the most abused or violated? For the accomplishment of the goals set out in this Thesis I shall strive to outline the scale of theoretic approaches and based on the effective layout and international practice express my own conclusions. Among others, the paper also aims at promoting the development of skills of the current diplomat and acquainting them with the norms of diplomatic correspondence. The aforementioned part of the Thesis also sets out another rather easily attained objective: due to the inexistence of comprehensive publications on this topic to become a handbook and reference manual not only for the young adepts of this profession but for all who for some reason take interest in Diplomacy. It was an ambition of the author to assemble and explain terms, which those interested in the practical aspects of Foreign Service, may be confronted with. The paper reflects current diplomatic practice and takes into account Czech circumstances. The author is endeavouring to mediate the information and knowledge she gained through years of practice at representative offices abroad gained during her practical experience at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and through more than 20 years of practice in academic research and instruction of this area.
3
Pelánová, Pavla. "Obchodní a diplomatický protokol Francie." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2013. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-193029.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of my master thesis was to specify the business and diplomatic protocol in France and answer several questions that I defined. Are there any differences between the facts that we read in books and guides about French business and diplomatic protocol, and the reality? Can we generalize French business protocol and say that it is valid for all sectors and generations of managers? Can we claim that French diplomatic protocol is valid all the time and every single president sticks to it? The first chapter explains all the key terms - protocol, business protocol, diplomatic protocol, business negotiation, etiquette. The second chapter focuses on French business protocol, especially organization and course of business negotiation, dress code and gift-giving etiquette, and finally characterizes a typical French company. The third chapter focuses on French diplomatic protocol, especially on all aspects conserning ambassadors in France. The fourth chapter represents the practical part and gives several practical examples of French business and diplomatic protocol. This part is based on four qualitative conversations with four experts on this domain.
4
Kyselovaа, K. S. "Diplomacy in the field of international business." Master's thesis, Sumy State University, 2021. https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/86557.
Full textAbstract:
The master’s thesis focuses on the diplomacy and cultural aspects in the theory of international relations. The analysis of theoretical positions of the role of diplomacy in the development and strengthening of international cooperation is carried out. The main purpose of this study is to propose a strategic path for further development of international relations against the background of a global pandemic.У роботі досліджені дипломатія та культурні аспекти в теорії міжнародних відносин. Проведений аналіз теоретичних положень ролі дипломатії у розвитку та зміцненні міжнародного співробітництва. Основною метою цього дослідження є пропозиція стратегічного шляху подальшого розвитку міжнародних відносин на фоні світової пандемії.
5
Skopová, Gabriela. "Profesní etiketa v mezinárodním prostředí." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2009. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-163061.
Full textAbstract:
The first part of the thesis is focused on professional etiquette in a diplomatic environment, i.e. diplomatic protocol. The second part describes rules of the professional etiquette in an international consulting company.
6
Skalová, Dominika Antonie. "Kulturní diplomacie." Master's thesis, Akademie múzických umění v Praze.Divadelní fakulta. Knihovna, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-202420.
Full textAbstract:
Diploma thesis "Cultural diplomacy" examines a specific field of diplomatic relations in which culture plays the key role. It introduces basic terminology and theoretical outcomes. Later, it defines cultural diplomacy in the broader context of public diplomacy, nation branding, and soft power. The main part is devoted to describing and analyzing the environment in the Czech Republic - it defines institutions and instruments used in the Czech environment and specifies methods of cultural diplomacy. With respect to subsections of cultural diplomacy, it is primarily devoted to the performing arts. The following chapter describing the transition of cultural diplomacy to guerilla diplomacy constitutes a substantial part of the thesis. It introduces this concept as the first thesis so far. Further it explains it in detail and points to the possibility of its application in the field of art and possibly culture. The final part includes suggestions for working more efficiently with tools of cultural and guerilla diplomacy in the Czech Republic.
7
Fedele, Dante. "Naissance de la diplomatie moderne. L'ambassadeur au croisement du droit, de l'éthique et de la politique." Thesis, Lyon, École normale supérieure, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014ENSL0968.
Full textAbstract:
S’appuyant sur un corpus de textes que l’on qualifie normalement de « traités sur l’ambassadeur », cette thèse s’attache à reconstruire la naissance de la diplomatie moderne tout au long d’une période qui va du XIIIe au XVIIe siècle, en essayant d’analyser la manière dont la figure de l’ambassadeur à été élaborée à l’intérieur d’un champ de problématisation qui se caractérise par une imbrication réciproque du droit, de l’éthique et de la politique et va constituer une véritable expérience de la diplomatie.Ce travail s’articule en deux parties. Dans la première il s’agit de comprendre comment la figure de l’ambassadeur a été façonnée sous le profil de son statut juridique, à savoir comme une persona publica chargée d’un officium et devant représenter son mandant, avec les conséquences qui en découlent quant à l’établissement de son pouvoir de négociation, à la définition de ses immunités ainsi qu’à la détermination des honneurs qu’il a le droit de recevoir. L’analyse de ces questions permettra d’apprécier la contribution apportée par notre corpus non seulement à la définition du statut juridique de l’ambassadeur, mais aussi à la formation du nouveau droit des gens destiné à régir l’Europe moderne. La seconde partie s’attache à comprendre comment la figure de l’ambassadeur a été façonnée sous le profil de son statut professionnel : on s’interroge alors sur les fonctions qui lui sont attribuées, sur les moyens qui lui sont fournis et les conditions qui lui sont demandées pour s’en acquitter de la manière la plus efficace, ainsi que sur la problématisation éthique à laquelle son action est soumise. Tout en essayant de faire ressortir la spécificité de l’ambassadeur, cette partie se propose aussi de contribuer à l’étude de la professionnalisation du fonctionnaire publicUsing a collection of texts commonly known as the “treatises on the ambassador”, this research examines the birth and the development of the experience of diplomacy from the 13th to the 17th Century. It aims, in particular, to explore the development of the figure of the ambassador within a field of problematization involving ethics, politics and law.After some methodological and historical remarks, the thesis deals with the development of the status of the ambassador from two perspectives, the legal and the professional. Regarding his legal status, the medieval legal conceptualisation of the role of the ambassador as a genuine public “office”, and that of the diplomatic function as “representation”, are examined. The way in which these conceptualisations help to define the negotiating powers conferred on the ambassador, his immunities and the honours to which he is entitled is then considered. This analysis allows for an investigation of the complex links between the exercise of diplomacy and claims to sovereignty during Europe’s transition from the Middle Ages to Modernity. Regarding his professional status, the thesis reconstructs the functions of the ambassador (particularly in relation to information gathering and negotiation), the means provided for the ambassador to undertake his functions (his salary and the assignment of an escort) and the objective, intellectual or moral qualities required of him. As well as illustrating the techniques which have been required for ambassadorial success since the 15th Century, this analysis offers some hints for studying the professionalization of public officials and the emergence of the modern criteria of political analysis
8
Burkel, Jean-Christophe. "Les approches sectorielles dans la diplomatie climatique." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012AIXM1042.
Full textAbstract:
L'approche sectorielle consiste à envisager la limitation ou la réduction des émissions mondiales de gaz à effet de serre secteur par secteur. Une telle approche implique un changement de paradigme par rapport à l'approche dominante de la diplomatie climatique qui s'articule principalement autour d'engagements portant sur l'ensemble de l'économie des différents Etats Parties. La principale question à laquelle tente de répondre la présente thèse de doctorat est de déterminer de quelle manière et sous quelles conditions la diplomatie climatique pourrait s'appuyer sur une approche sectorielle pour accroître l'efficacité des efforts internationaux de lutte contre les changements climatiques. Il s'agit de déterminer si la généralisation de démarches, de politiques, d'actions ou de mesures par secteur pourrait permettre de réduire substantiellement et au moindre coût les émissions de gaz à effet de serre. Pour ce faire, de nombreuses pistes de réflexions sont envisagées : des négociations distinctes au sein d'organisations internationales spécialisées, des initiatives sectorielles volontaires, des partenariats internationaux, des démarches sectorielles et autres mesures par secteurs concertées, des mécanismes sectoriels fondés sur le marché. Dans chaque cas de figure, il s'agit d'examiner dans quels secteurs, mais également autour de quelles parties prenantes et à partir de quels mécanismes, des démarches sectorielles pourraient concrètement émergerSectoral approaches refer to a series of new proposals, which focuses on the limitation of world greenhouse gas emission on a sector-by-sector basis. Thess approaches relie on a change of paradigm with regard to the dominant approach of the international climate regime, which is based upon an economy-wide approach towards GHG emissions. The main issue addressed by this PhD dissertation is to clarify how and under which conditions a sectoral approach could efficiently and effectively contribute to the reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions. Could sector-specific initiatives, policies, actions and measures practically reduce GHG emissions at the lowest cost? In which sectors? Involving which stakeholders? Relying on which legal, economic or financial instruments? A sectoral approach could potentially be implemented through different legal/economic/financial means: separated sectoral negotiations within specialised international organisations, voluntary sectoral initiatives, international sector-based partnerships, cooperative approaches and sector-specific actions and/or sectoral market-based mechanisms. Subsequently, this dissertation evaluates the relevance and the practical feasibility of various sector-based proposals during the first period of commitment and beyond 2012
9
Kingston, de Leusse Meredith. "Etre diplomate : éléments pour une étude de l'activité d'ambassadeur." Paris 1, 1996. http://www.theses.fr/1996PA010282.
Full textAbstract:
Le statut actuel de l'activité d'ambassadeur soulève des interrogations, notamment celle de sa marge de manœuvre. Nous avons analysé les facteurs structurels qui suggèrent aujourd'hui le déclin objectif du pouvoir de l'ambassadeur. Un ensemble de rapports de forces et des processus de hiérarchisation organisent la structure des espaces d'activités diplomatiques et contraignent les chefs de mission diplomatique dans leur capitale d'accréditation. Dans ce contexte, le quai d’Orsay tente de redéfinir l'activité d'ambassadeur et de délimiter un savoir-faire diplomatique. Les ambassadeurs préservent un certain pouvoir en déployant un ensemble de formes symboliques exprimant le fait qu'ils gèrent la représentation de la France à l'étranger. Ainsi la forme donne du pouvoir aux ambassadeurs qui savent et peuvent la manier, c'est-à-dire trouver un juste équilibre entre la distanciation et l'engagement. La mise en forme limite cependant la marge de manœuvre des ambassadeurs qui, en tant que personnes morales, jouent un rôle dépassant leur personne et doivent se plier aux intérêts supérieurs de la représentation de la France a l'étrangerAmbassadors'status brings up questions, namely concerning their latitude. The analysis of certain structural forms suggests a decline of ambassadors' power. Power play and hierarchical processes determine diplomatic activity and limit the efficacy of these activities. In such a context, the french ministry of foreign affairs has tried to define more precisely the individualised role of ambassadors. They have managed to preserve some power by rendering visible a group of symbolic forms that expressly serve representation of france abroad. These forms can render power to the diplomat who is able to put them into effect by finding a balance between aloofness and commitment. But this kind of formalism limits ambassadors' latitude because they represent a moral entity and play a role that surpass their individuality. Therefore they need to surrender to the higher interests as designated by the french state
10
Sueldo, Mariana. "Diplomatinio protokolo kaita ir jai įtaką darantys veiksniai." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2011. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20110709_152158-43489.
Full textAbstract:
Santrauka Diplomatinio protokolo kaita kaip veidrodis atspindi visus visuomenės gyvenimo pokyčius. Didelę įtaką diplomatiniam protokolui turėjo revoliucinės idėjos, reikalavusios keisti visa ką, įskaitant diplomatų, kaip valstybių atstovų, tarpusavio bendravimą. Lygybės siekis ir aristokratiškų manierų atmetimas buvo pirmasis bandymas radikaliai keisti diplomatinį protokolą. Tačiau šis bandymas nebuvo iki galo sėkmingas. Iš pagrindų pakeistus tarpusavio bendravimo taisykles, vėliau vėl buvo bandoma sugrįžti prie anksčiau nusistovėjusių normų. Vis dėl to liko naujovių. Nuo XX amžiaus pradžios iki mūsų dienų dėl sparčiai tobulėjančių logistikos ir telekomunikacijos technologijų, į diplomatinio protokolo erdvę patenka vis daugiau ir naujų veikėjų. Komunikacija darosi intensyvesnė, tai savo ruožtu sąlygoja tarptautinio bendravimo taisyklių paprastėjimą. Intensyvus technologijų vystymas padarė žiniasklaidą aktyvia diplomatinės komunikacijos tarpininke, tarnaujančia ne tik kaip komunikacinio pranešimo kanalas, bet ir kaip pranešimo interpretuotoja. Diplomatinio protokolo erdvės plėtimasis įtraukia diplomatinės komunikacijos dalyvius į praktiškai nepertraukiamą komunikacijos procesą, kuris tampa kasdienybe. Šis tapsmas vėlgi sąlygoja protokolo taisyklių paprastėjimą ir bendravimo betarpiškumo didėjimą. Diplomatinis protokolas, nors ceremonijų ir ritualų bei diplomatų tarpasmeninis bendravimas supaprastėjo, vis dėlto yra būtina tarptautinės komunikacijos priemonė, kuria naudojasi ne... [toliau žr. visą tekstą]ABSTRACT The developments in diplomatic protocol unquestionably reflect, as on a mirror, all the social, historical, economic, geopolitical and technological changes that through the passage of time take place in the life of any society. Revolutionary ideas can be considered some of the most influential factors affecting diplomatic protocol, as they sought a thorough transformation that would not leave a single sphere of life untouched, not even the way diplomats should interact. The frenetic pursuit of equality and refusal of aristocratic manners was the first though unsuccessful attempt to radically change diplomatic protocol. Interpersonal communication rules established by revolutionary force would later on turn back to previously set norms. Yet some innovations remained, at least in the revolutionary spirit that would always stir the minds of future generations to find new agents of change. The rapidly advancing logistics and telecommunication technologies led to an expansion of the diplomatic protocol arena, onto which more and more players can be seen entering from the most varied walks of life and professions. Communication amongst them has become more intense than ever before, and this has undoubtedly conditioned the need to simplify the rules of interpersonal communication. The smart pace of technological development has also made of mass media an active mediator, which does not only function as a communication channel, but has also taken the role of information... [to full text]
Books on the topic "Diplomatic protocol"
1
Kurmanguzhin, S. A. Diplomatic protocol and diplomatic correspondence. Almaty: Print House "KAPrint", 2001.
Find full text
2
Sudhimant, Nuan. Bidhīkār kārdut =: Diplomatic protocol. [Phnom Penh]: Rājpanḍitsbhā Kambujā, 2004.
Find full text
3
Moller, Jonathan R. The protocol advantage. New York, N.Y: Protocol Resource and Operations Service, 1993.
Find full text
4
Tărîță, Orest. Protocol, ceremonial, etichetă. Chișinău: Transparency International Moldova, 2006.
Find full text
5
Zhou, Jiali, and Guobin Zhang, eds. A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9.
Full text
6
Morris, Allen Covington. Practical protocol for Floridians. 4th ed. [Tallahassee?]: Florida House of Representatives, 1988.
Find full text
7
Morris, Allen Covington. Practical protocol for Floridians. 3rd ed. [Tallahassee]: Florida House of Representatives, 1985.
Find full text
8
Pittman, William S. Practical protocol for Florida officials. 6th ed. Tallahassee, Fla: Florida House of Representatives, 2008.
Find full text
9
Pittman, William S. Practical protocol for Florida officials. 6th ed. Tallahassee, Fla: Florida House of Representatives, 2008.
Find full text
10
Malaysian protocol & correct forms of address. 3rd ed. Singapore: Times Books International, 2002.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Diplomatic protocol"
1
Dussault, Louis. "Protocol and International Meetings." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 147–59. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_14.
Full text
2
Dussault, Louis. "Protocol and International Meetings." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 147–59. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_14.
Full text
3
Wu, Deguang. "Protocol for Economic Diplomacy." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 175–81. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_17.
Full text
4
Teranishi, Chiyoko. "What is Protocol?—Experience and Approach from a Japanese Protocol Officer." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 243–57. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_24.
Full text
5
Jobard, Fabrice. "The Specificities of French Protocol." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 229–42. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_23.
Full text
6
Jobard, Fabrice. "The Specificities of French Protocol." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 229–42. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_23.
Full text
7
Wen, Quan. "The Evolution and Development of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 91–98. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_8.
Full text
8
Ma, Baofeng. "The Kowtow in Feudal Chinese Protocol and Its Demise." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 13–25. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_2.
Full text
9
Rana, Kishan S. "Protocol and Efficacy: Blending Rules with Imagination and Innovation." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 27–38. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_3.
Full text
10
Wen, Quan. "The Evolution and Development of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette." In A Study of Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette, 91–98. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0687-9_8.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Diplomatic protocol"
1
Karluk, S. Rıdvan, and Ayşen Hiç Gencer. "Turkey and Uzbekistan Relations within the Scope of Economic and Political Integration of Central Asia." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c07.01466.
Full textAbstract:
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Uzbekistan declared her sovereignty on June 20th, 1990 and her independence on September 1st, 1991. Turkey was the first country to recognize the Republic of Uzbekistan on December 16th, 1991. On March 4th, 1992, diplomatic relations between Turkey and Uzbekistan were established and more than 90 bilateral agreements and protocols were signed. Among the Central Asian countries, Uzbekistan has an important geopolitical location and has the largest Turkish population. Turkish and Uzbek people share the same culture and language (Uzbek-Chagatai Turkish). Prime Minister Erdoğan and President Kerimov emphasized the necessity of improving the Turkish-Uzbek relations at the opening ceremony of Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics. Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoğlu's visit on July 10th, 2014 started improving bilateral relations that had come to a halt in 2003. This paper analyzes Turkish-Uzbek relations in the framework of integration in Central Asia and with respect to the structural economic changes in Uzbekistan and her foreign trade policy.
Reports on the topic "Diplomatic protocol"
1
Martínez Linero, Omaira María. Diplomacia y protocolo. Ediciones Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, December 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.16925/gcnc.07.
Full text