Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'Doha Development Agenda (2001- ) http'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Doha Development Agenda (2001- ) http.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Doha Development Agenda (2001- ) http"
Lim, Chin Leng. "China and the Doha Development Agenda." Journal of World Trade 44, Issue 6 (December 1, 2010): 1309–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/trad2010050.
Full textvan Dijck, Pitou. "How to Save the Doha Round: A European Perspective." European Foreign Affairs Review 11, Issue 3 (August 1, 2006): 291–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eerr2006027.
Full textSubedi, Surya P. "The Road From Doha: The Issues for the Development Round of the Wto and the Future of International Trade." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52, no. 2 (April 2003): 425–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclq/52.2.425.
Full textPutri, Karina Dwi Nugrahanti. "THE TRADE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK PROVIDED BY TRIPS AND CLAIM OF ‘PRO-DEVELOPMENT’ AGENDA." Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 31, no. 2 (June 3, 2019): 267. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jmh.36976.
Full textDufour, Genevieve, and David Pavot. "WTO Negotiations: The Unfinished Doha Development Agenda and the Emergence of New Topics." Global Trade and Customs Journal 15, Issue 5 (May 1, 2020): 244–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2020033.
Full textDas, Kasturi. "GATS 2000 Negotiations and India: Evolution and State of Play." Journal of World Trade 41, Issue 6 (December 1, 2007): 1185–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/trad2007045.
Full textSmeets, Maarten. "Trade Capacity Building in the WTO: Main Achievements since Doha and Key Challenges." Journal of World Trade 47, Issue 5 (October 1, 2013): 1047–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/trad2013035.
Full textKanade, Mihir. "Chronicles of the Doha Wars: The Battle of Nairobi – Appraisal of the Tenth WTO Ministerial." Strathmore Law Journal 2, no. 1 (August 1, 2016): 155–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.52907/slj.v2i1.19.
Full textAnuradha, R. V. "Beyond Rules and Agreements: Reading the Tea Leaves." Global Trade and Customs Journal 14, Issue 7/8 (August 1, 2019): 352–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2019039.
Full textKerremans, Bart, and Edith Drieskens. "Tussen schok en overgang : de Europese Unie in 2001." Res Publica 44, no. 2-3 (September 30, 2002): 279–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.21825/rp.v44i2-3.18440.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Doha Development Agenda (2001- ) http"
Coskeran, Helen Mary. "Farm talks and the new quad : an analysis of agriculture negotiations in the Doha Round between the established and the rising powers." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2013. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.608082.
Full textNyhodo, Bonani. "The impact of the Doha round of WTO agricultural negotiations on the South African economy." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1734.
Full textThe Doha Round of negotiations on the liberalisation of agricultural trade inherited complications from its predecessor - the Uruguay Round (UR). It needs to be noted, as one of the fundamental differences, that agriculture sectors in the developed countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) get support from their governments. In contrast to the situation, in the developing countries, agriculture is taxed to generate government revenue. The subsidies that farmers receive in the developed countries affect farmers globally through world prices (world prices depression). Therefore protection and greater subsidies should be not encouraged. As such, after a long time of preferential treatment, agriculture trade was tabled as a separate issue of negotiations at the UR and resulted to the round to be prolonged. However, one of the achievements of the UR was imposing of bound tariffs on agricultural products and determining tariff equivalence for non-tariff measures. Then, the Doha Round (DR) also known as the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which is the first round to place development and focus strongly on agricultural liberalisation as a tool for development. International trade theory supports agricultural liberalisation, as negotiated in the DDA. Therefore, the DDA, in seeking more liberalised agricultural markets, continues a theoretically sound approach, as in the UR. The effects of liberalising agricultural trade in the DDA will differ across countries, whereas some will gain, others may loose, and the same situation is true for different sectors within an economy. The focus of the DDA on agriculture, as a tool of development, links well to the fact that agriculture in the developing countries accounts for a substantial share of their gross domestic products (GDPs) and exports. This situation, therefore, calls for a closer consideration of the possible impact of agricultural liberalisation in South Africa even though agricultural share of GDP is less than 4 percent.
Neto, Manoel Galdino Pereira. "Controle de agenda nas negociações do TRIPS e Saúde Pública em Doha, 2001." Universidade de São Paulo, 2007. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8131/tde-01102007-145743/.
Full textThis dissertation aimed to explain why Brazilian leaded coalition was capable of achieve a \"victory\" in WTO negotiation on TRIPs and Public Health, which culminated in the Doha Declaration. Following game theory applied to legislative studies, we tried to show the attainableness of suiting that literature to WTO negotiation, specially the feature of agenda setting. Basically, our main thesis is that what dictate negotiation results in this case is the institutional setting, since it determine power distribution among actors. Thus, we expect have shown the possibility of explain the final result in the TRIPs and Public Health negotiation by consensus rule, neutrality of agenda setting and the distribution of states impatience. The analysis has suggested a rich research agenda in the study of any noncooperative game in international institutions as well in the formulation of an institutionalist power concept in international relations.
Efstathopoulos, Charalampos. "Middle power diplomacy in the WTO : India, South Africa and the Doha development agenda." Thesis, University of Warwick, 2012. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/51625/.
Full textWeeks, Heather Ashley. "Assessing the Impacts of a Special Safeguard Mechanism for Agriculture in the Doha Development Agenda." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32037.
Full textMaster of Science
Lamprecht, Jens. "Bargaining power in multilateral trade negotiations : Canada and Japan in the Uruguay Round and Doha development agenda." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2014. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/903/.
Full textObenbergerová, Linda. "Rozvojové země v mnohostranném obchodním systému: perspektivy Katarského kola." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2010. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-75635.
Full textKone, Siaka. "Catégorisation et évaluation de divers scénarios de conclusion du volet agricole du cycle de Doha pour les filières coton en Afrique de l'ouest et du centre." Thesis, Montpellier, SupAgro, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011NSAM0015/document.
Full textAgriculture, especially cotton, causes contention in the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Doha Development Agenda (DDA) since 2001. This study analyses and provides quantitative estimates of the likely economics impacts of various scenarios. We propose an alternative scenario further based on the principle of special and differential treatment provided to developing countries. We consider seven key scenarios in this study: (1) the Uruguay Round agreements, (2) Falconer' negotiation draft, revised in December 2008 but without special measures for cotton, (3) Similar Falconer's draft but including special measures for cotton as proposed by the C4 Group, (4) the European Union position, (5) the United States position, (6) our alternative scenario of agreements and (7) the total liberalization even if ambitious in scope. Our alternative scenario lies on the improvement of the access of African cotton into the Chinese market and on the strengthening of domestic support to cotton production in West and Central Africa. This scenario is original by considering the set up of a new fund for international solidarity through the subsidy savings implemented by developed countries. We use the Agricultural trade Policy Simulation Model (ATPSM) to evaluate the economic effect and the Stiglitz and Charlton theory of equity for equity assessment. The results showed that our alternative scenario increases the world cotton price by 8.1%, the producer price by 10.8% which is higher than the Falconer' negotiation draft with special measures for cotton (9.0%) and the United States position (6.1%). With regard to the equity criteria, our alternative scenario is as attractive as the other scenarios in comparison with the Uruguay Round agreements scenario. The alternative scenario can help to conclude the WTO-Doha Development Agenda. This scenario takes into account some key elements of a compromise between major actors of WTO, and provides provisions for and international fund to help the west and central Africa cotton sectors
Djemilou, Mohamed. "The impact of the Bali agreement on the Doha round stalemate with particular reference to the interests of developing and least developed countries." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5122.
Full textThe problem that this Research Paper is aiming to examine is whether the Bali Agreement has successfully impacted on the consensus pitfalls and the Doha Round stalemate as shown in the background to the study.
National Bursary and Grants Agency (ANBG)
Rejtharová, Denisa. "Aktuální politické otázky mezinárodního obchodu v souvislosti s problematikou rozvoje v Subsaharské Africe." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2008. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-3896.
Full textBooks on the topic "Doha Development Agenda (2001- ) http"
Workshop on Management Development Programme on Doha Development Agenda (2003 Singapore). Workshop on Management Development Programme on Doha Development Agenda. Colombo: Colombo Plan-Private Sector Development Programme, 2004.
Find full textAnderson, Kym. Agricultural trade reform and the Doha development agenda. [Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2005.
Find full textArndt, Channing. The Doha trade round and Mozambique. [Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2005.
Find full textAchterbosch, Thom. Trade liberalization under the Doha Development Agenda: Options and consequences for Africa. [Addis Ababa]: African Trade Policy Centre, 2004.
Find full textHammouda, Hakim Ben. Doha Round entre promesses, désillusions et résignations. Addis Ababa]: Centre africain de politiques commerciale, 2005.
Find full text1949-, Schott Jeffrey J., and Wong Woan Foong, eds. Figuring out the Doha Round. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2010.
Find full textFinger, J. M. The Doha agenda and development: A view from the Uruguay Round. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2002.
Find full textFinger, J. M. The Doha agenda and development: A view from the Uruguay Round. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2002.
Find full textFinger, J. M. The Doha agenda and development: A view from the Uruguay Round. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2002.
Find full textChŏng, Chae-ho. WTO DDA hyŏpsang kwa kwanseyul ch'egye pyŏnhwa yŏn'gu. Sŏul T'ŭkpyŏlsi: Han'guk Chose Yŏn'guwŏn, 2006.
Find full text