Relevant bibliographies by topics / Dominique Janicaud

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Dominique Janicaud'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 7 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Dominique Janicaud.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Dominique Janicaud"

1

Rockmore, Tom. "Dominique Janicaud. Heidegger in France." American Historical Review 122, no. 2 (2017): 589–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ahr/122.2.589.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Critchley, Simon. "In Memoriam: Dominique Janicaud (1937-2002)." Research in Phenomenology 33, no. 1 (2003): 3–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691640360699582.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Brennan, Eileen. "Paul Ricœur and the “Theological Turn” in French Phenomenology." Philosophy Today 62, no. 1 (2018): 163–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201837206.

Full text
Abstract:
Dominique Janicaud considered Paul Ricœur an ally in the dispute with those who, like Emmanuel Lévinas and Jean-Luc Marion, allegedly failed to keep phenomenology within its proper methodological limits. Janicaud also claimed to have been guided by Ricœur when it came to developing positive proposals for the future direction of phenomenology. This paper argues, however, that Janicaud misinterpreted key passages in works by Ricœur that address phenomenological issues. It also offers alternative readings which take account of the wider context. Thus, for example, Ricœur’s comments on Lévinasian phenomenology are shown to be appreciative rather than polemical. The paper also discusses Ricœur’s rarely commented upon oblique and indirect response to Janicaud, which establishes that Ricœur chose to align himself with phenomenologists who had taken “the theological turn.”
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Critchley, Simon. "Qui Vivra Verra—Obituary for Dominique Janicaud." Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 34, no. 2 (2003): 221–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2003.11863843.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Critchley, Simon. "The overcoming of overcoming: On Dominique Janicaud." Continental Philosophy Review 36, no. 4 (2003): 433–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:mawo.0000015914.51522.eb.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Roggero, Jorge Luis. "La «dimensión religiosa» de la fenomenología de la donación de J.-L. Marion." ENDOXA, no. 40 (December 19, 2017): 335. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.40.2017.17001.

Full text
Abstract:
¿Puede hablarse de un «giro teológico» respecto de la fenomenología de Jean-Luc Marion? ¿La acusación de Dominique Janicaud es pertinente? ¿Mantiene aún alguna vigencia? Habría que responder que el diagnóstico de Janicaud es acertado y, al mismo tiempo, que no lo es. Existe una «dimensión religiosa» en la fenomenología de la donación, pero ésta no debe leerse como un obstáculo para la tarea fenomenológica. Este artículo se propone establecer de qué modo opera esta «dimensión religiosa» en la propuesta de Marion.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

FINEGAN, THOMAS. "Levinas's faithfulness to Husserl, phenomenology, and God." Religious Studies 48, no. 3 (2011): 281–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412511000229.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe contemporary debate in phenomenology concerning the ‘theological turn’ raises the issue of the relationship between faith and reason. One of the foremost statements on the theological turn, that of Dominique Janicaud, is an affirmation of the faith–reason dichotomy in the context of phenomenology, specifically in relation to how thinkers like Emmanuel Levinas have abused the phenomenological project of its founder, Edmund Husserl. This article challenges the faith–reason dichotomy and shows that the role of faith in Levinas need not mark him out as a deviant from Husserlian phenomenology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Haase, Ullrich. "L'Ombre De Cette Pensee—Heidegger Et La Question Politique, by Dominique Janicaud." Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 26, no. 2 (1995): 206–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1995.11007111.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Černý, Jan. "To Hear the Sound of One’s Own Birth: Michel Henry on Religious Experience." Open Theology 6, no. 1 (2020): 587–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0103.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe article consists of two parts. The first part outlines two conceptions of religious experience that can be found in the last three philosophical books of Michel Henry: the first, broad conception of religious experience is connected with the transcendental relation of human self to God as proposed by Henry; the second, narrower conception concerns the story of salvation as told in Henry’s Christian trilogy, and acquires the form of the “second birth.” Yet the transcendental disposition of Henry’s phenomenology prevents it from developing hermeneutical tools that would guide the understanding of religious experience. The second part of the article deals with the critique of Dominique Janicaud, who questioned the phenomenological methodology of Michel Henry precisely because of its religious overtone, and with the subsequent discussion incited by Janicaud’s criticism. The article defends the phenomenological status of Henry’s work by arguing that Henry’s thinking could not be rightly accused from being theological or metaphysical at the time of the publication of Janicaud’s first critique. Yet it is true that the later Christian trilogy identified the general structures of appearing with the inner life of the God of the Christian Bible, and the experience of Christian faith thus became the presupposition of Henry’s phenomenology. The article also argues that religious experience belongs to the field of phenomenological research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Raffoul, François. "The Untold Story of Heidegger in France. Review of Heidegger en France by Dominique Janicaud." Research in Phenomenology 33, no. 1 (2003): 299–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691640360699744.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Dominique Janicaud"

1

Della, Zazzera Anthony. "Rationality, Impossibility, and Analogy: Gadamer's Hermeneutics and the "Theological" Turn in French Phenomenology." Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/40898.

Full text
Abstract:
In contemporary, French phenomenology, a debate has arisen concerning whether phenomenology can allow for a certain kind of “theological” consideration. In particular, Jean-Luc Marion argues that the potential of the reduction has not been fully explored and that a full reduction to pure givenness in fact allows one to give an account of the paradoxical experience of the impossible beyond experience, which is described as a phenomenon of revelation and may include a Revelation of God. Marion’s claims have been considered contentious. As I interpret it, the debate plays out between 1) those who also admit that phenomenology can occasion a form of “theological” consideration, but maintain, unlike Marion, that it remains a more existential affirmation of the impossible beyond experience, represented by Jacques Derrida and John Caputo, and 2) those who refuse any role for this impossible beyond experience within phenomenology (and perhaps more generally), and insist that phenomenology be preserved as an essentialist science of the appearances, represented by Dominique Janicaud. I take the positions of Derrida and Caputo, on the one hand, and Janicaud, on the other, to each entail extreme consequences that ought to be avoided—the former resulting in a form of irrationalism and the latter converting phenomenology into a form of pragmatism. Furthermore, I find Marion’s basic claim, that the impossible beyond experience ought to have a role in shaping finite experience, to be worth investigating further. However, Marion concedes too much to the deconstructive position of Derrida and Caputo at the outset, and so I find that the philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer provides an opportunity to correct some of the deficiencies in Marion’s position, but also argue to a similar end as he does. I find that Gadamer’s position incorporates an implicit analogical structure between rational experience and the impossible, thereby permitting one to maintain the impossible as impossible, but also affirm a certain possibility for understanding it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Dominique Janicaud"

1

Le souci de la métaphysique: Trois études sur Dominique Janicaud & Jean-François Mattéi. Les éditions Ovadia, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

1942-, Dastur Françoise, Beistegui Miguel de 1966-, and Janicaud Dominique 1937-, eds. Dominique Janicaud, l'intelligence du partage. Belin, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

1942-, Dastur Françoise, Beistegui Miguel de 1966-, and Janicaud Dominique 1937-, eds. Dominique Janicaud, l'intelligence du partage. Belin, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hellenica: Autour de dix textes grecs : hommage à Dominique Janicaud. Phenix éditions, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Dominique Janicaud"

1

Giovannangeli, Daniel. "Chapitre VII. Dominique Janicaud. L’immanence et le partage." In La Phénoménologie partagée. Presses universitaires de Liège, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/books.pulg.7491.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Dominique Janicaud' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography