Books on the topic 'Dose Assessment'

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Uncertainties in internal radiation: Dose assessment. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 2010.

Crump, Kenny S. The use of the benchmark dose approach in health risk assessment. Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995.

Crump, Kenny S. The use of the benchmark dose approach in health risk assessment. Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995.

Crump, Kenny S. The use of the benchmark dose approach in health risk assessment. Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995.

S, Allen Bruce M., Faustman Elaine, and United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment Forum., eds. The use of the benchmark dose approach in health risk assessment. Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995.

Macdonald, Colin R. External ICRP 60 dose conversion factors for air and water immersion, groundshine and soil. Pinawa, Man: AECL, Whiteshell Laboratories, 1996.

Meinhold, C. B. Impact of reduced dose limits on NRC licensed activities: Major issues in the implementation of ICRP/NCRP dose limit recommendations : final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1995.

U, S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington Va ). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. Washington, DC: [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

U, S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington Va ). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. Washington, DC: [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

U, S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington Va ). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. Washington, DC: [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington, Va.). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. Washington, DC: [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington, Va.). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. Washington, DC: [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington, Va.). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. Washington, DC: [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington, Va.). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity: Sheraton Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia, August 5-6, 1998. Washington, DC: National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999.

U, S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington Va ). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington, Va.). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. Washington, DC: [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington, Va.). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity: Sheraton Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia, August 5-6, 1998. Washington, DC: National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999.

U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity (1998 Arlington, Va.). Summary of the U.S. EPA Workshop on the Relationship between Exposure Duration and Toxicity. Washington, DC: [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.

L, Sielken Robert, ed. Quantitative cancer modeling and risk assessment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1993.

Cooke, Roger M. Uncertainty modeling in dose response: Bench testing environmental toxicity. Hoboken: Wiley, 2009.

National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. and National Research Council (U.S.). Division on Earth and Life Studies., eds. Science and decisions: Advancing risk assessment. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press, 2009.

Kalberlah, Fritz. Quantifizierung von Extrapolationsfaktoren: Endbericht des Forschungsvorhabens Nr. 116 06 113 des Umweltbundesamtes. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, 1998.

Amiro, B. D. Radiological dose conversion factors for non-human biota for Canada's nuclear fuel waste disposal concept assessment. Pinawa, Man: AECL, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, 1992.

Workshops on Principles of Route-to-Route Extrapolation for Risk Assessment (1990 Hilton Head, S.C., and Durham, N.C.). Principles of route-to-route extrapolation for risk assessment: Proceedings of the Workshops on Principles of Route-to-Route Extrapolation for Risk Assessment held March 19-21, 1990, in Hilton Head, South Carolina and July 10-11, 1990, in Durham, North Carolina. Edited by Gerrity Timothy R, Henry Carol J, Health Effects Research Laboratory (Research Triangle Park, N.C.), and ILSI Risk Science Institute. New York: Elsevier, 1990.

Webster, Edward W. Dose and risk in diagnostic radiology: How big? how little? Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1992.

Zach, Reto. The food-chain and dose submodel, CALDOS, for the assessment of Canada's nuclear fuel waste management concept. Pinwawa, Man: Whiteshell Laboratories, 1992.

Palattao, M. V. B. Evaluation of the use of ICRP 60 dose conversion factors in a postclosure assessment of a deep geological disposal system. Pinawa, Man: Whiteshell Laboratories, 1997.

United Nations Environment Programme. Medical Technical Options Committee. 2006 report of the Medical Technical Options Committee: 2006 assessment. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme, Ozone Secretariat, 2007.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Meeting. Environmental dose reconstruction and risk implications: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting 12-13 April 1995, as presented at the Crystal City Marriott, Arlington, VA. Edited by Till John E. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1996.

1818-1819, Phillips R. fl, Goetz J, Klemm J, United States. Defense Nuclear Agency., and Science Applications International Corporation, eds. Internal dose assessment -- Operation Crossroads. Washington, D.C: Defense Nuclear Agency, 1985.

I, Scherpelz R., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Inspection and Enforcement. Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data. Division of Operational Assessment., and Pacific Northwest Laboratory, eds. The MESORAD dose assessment model. Washington, D.C: Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1986.

Agency, International Atomic Energy, ed. Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment: A manual. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2001.

(Editor), K. F. Baverstock, and J. W. Stather (Editor), eds. Low Dose Radiation: Biological Bases of Risk Assessment. Taylor & Francis, 1989.

Herbert, Donald E. Quality Assessment and Improvement for Dose Response Models. Medical Physics Pub Corp, 1993.

Agency, International Atomic Energy, ed. Biological dosimetry: Chromosomal aberration analysis for dose assessment. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 1986.

F, Baverstock K., and Stather J. W, eds. Low dose radiation: Biological bases of risk assessment. London: Taylor & Francis, 1989.

Intact decommissioning of nuclear power plants: A dose assessment. Bethesda, MD (7101 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda 20814-4891): Atomic Industrial Forum, 1986.

IPCS. Principles for Modelling Dose-Response for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals. World Health Organization, 2008.

J, Case Marilyn, Radiological Assessments Corporation, Rocky Flats Dose Reconstruction Project., and Colorado. Division of Disease Control and Environmental Epidemiology., eds. The Rocky Flats Dose Reconstruction Project. Neeses, SC: Radiological Assessments Corp., 1994.

United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment Forum and CDM Group Inc, eds. Colloquium on approaches to quantifying health risks for threshold or nonlinear effects at low dose. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, 2000.

Follesdal, D., C. Streffer, J. G. Hengstler, P. Jacob, D. Oughton, K. Prieß, E. Rehbinder, E. Swaton, P. Hall, and H. Bolt. Low Dose Exposures in the Environment: Dose-Effect Relations and Risk Evaluation (Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment). Springer, 2004.

National Center for Environmental Assessment (Cincinnati, Ohio), ed. Developing relative potency factors for pesticide mixtures: Biostatistical analyses of joint dose-response. Cincinnati, Ohio: National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003.

A review of the reference dose and reference concentration processes. Washington, D.C: Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.

Biological indicators for radiation dose assessment =: Biologische Indikatoren zum Nachweis von Strahlenexpositionen. München: MMV Medizin Verlag, 1986.

S, Olin Stephen, ed. Low-dose extrapolation of cancer risks: Issues and perspectives. Washington, DC: ILSI Press, 1995.

(Editor), Stephen S. Olin, William Farland (Editor), Colin Park (Editor), Lorenz Rhomberg (Editor), Robert Scheuplein (Editor), Thomas Starr (Editor), and James Wilson (Editor), eds. Low-Dose Extrapolation of Cancer Risks: Issues and Perspectives. Ilsi Press, 1995.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements., ed. A guide for uncertainty analysis in dose and risk assessments related to environmental contamination. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protectionand Measurements, 1996.

Holland, Charles D. Quantitive cancer modeling and risk assessment. PTR Prentice Hall, 1993.

2, 2-Dichloro-1, 1trifluoroethane (Hcfc-123) (Concise International Chemical Assessment Document). World Health Organization, 2000.

K, Roecklein A., Richter B. J, Brookhaven National Laboratory, and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. Division of Regulatory Applications., eds. Value of public health and safety actions and radiation dose avoided. Washington, DC: Division of Regulatory Applications, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1994.