Academic literature on the topic 'Dosimeters – Evaluation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Dosimeters – Evaluation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Dosimeters – Evaluation"
Han, Moo Jae, Seung Woo Yang, Sang Il Bae, Young Min Moon, Wan Jeon, Chul Won Choi, Sung Kwang Park, and Jin Young Kim. "Evaluation of monoxide film-based dosimeters for surface dose detection in electron therapy." PLOS ONE 16, no. 5 (May 21, 2021): e0251441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251441.
Full textYoo, Wook Jae, Kyoung Won Jang, Jin Soo Moon, Ki Tek Han, Bong Soo Lee, Seung Hyun Cho, and Sin Kim. "Performance Evaluation of Scintillation Fiber-Optic Dosimeter for Measuring High-Energy Photon Beams." Advanced Materials Research 378-379 (October 2011): 701–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.378-379.701.
Full textApelmann, Kowald, Weinrich, Dischinger, Nienhaus, Seide, Martens, and Jürgens. "Radiation Dose to the Eye Lens Through Radiological Imaging Procedures at the Surgical Workplace During Trauma Surgery." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 20 (October 11, 2019): 3850. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203850.
Full textEinbergs, E., A. Zolotarjovs, I. Bite, J. Cipa, V. Vitola, K. Laganovska, and L. Trinkler. "Re-Evaluation of Chromium Doped Alumina for Dosimetric Applications." Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences 58, no. 1 (January 29, 2021): 15–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2021-0002.
Full textRabaeh, Khalid, and Ahmed Basfar. "Optical evaluation of dithizone solution as a new radiochromic dosimeter." Pigment & Resin Technology 49, no. 4 (February 28, 2020): 249–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/prt-10-2019-0091.
Full textSiti, K. A. R., S. M. Iskandar, A. R. Azhar, M. R. Ramzun, and Mohamed Kamari Halimah. "Acoustic Evaluation of Hema Polymer Gel Dosimeter Phantoms." Advanced Materials Research 895 (February 2014): 169–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.895.169.
Full textGerasia, Roberta, Dario Ligresti, Fabio Cipolletta, Antonino Granata, Ilaria Tarantino, Luca Barresi, Michele Amata, et al. "Endoscopist’s occupational dose evaluation related to correct wearing of dosimeter during X-ray-guided procedures." Endoscopy International Open 07, no. 03 (February 28, 2019): E367—E371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0841-3350.
Full textAbraheem, Abeer Z., F. Khamis, and Y. A. Abdulla. "TL Characteristics and Dosimetric Aspects of Mg-Doped ZnO." European Journal of Applied Physics 3, no. 1 (January 29, 2021): 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejphysics.2021.3.1.37.
Full textde Almeida, Shirlane Barbosa, Daniel Villani, Roberto Kenji Sakuraba, Ana Carolina Pires de Rezende, Silas Cardoso Santos, and Letícia Lucente Campos. "Dosimetric evaluation employing TL and OSL techniques with different luminescent materials for clinical evaluation of extremity doses using electron beams applied to Total-Irradiation-of-Skin treatments." International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series 48 (January 2018): 1860110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010194518601102.
Full textManzoli, José Eduardo, Vicente de Paulo de Campos, and Mirian Saori Doi. "Evaluation of reproductibility and detection limit of CaSO4: dy radiation detectors." Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 49, spe (January 2006): 53–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1516-89132006000200009.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Dosimeters – Evaluation"
Griffis, Neale Jeff. "Performance evaluation of the Dosicard electronic personal dosimeter." Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/16991.
Full textLhallabi, Abdessamad. "Evaluation des incertitudes dans la preparation et la realisation des traitements par radiotherapie transcutanee." Toulouse 3, 1987. http://www.theses.fr/1987TOU30076.
Full textLangdal, Ingrid. "Dosimetry and evaluation of algorithm for inverseoptimized doseplanning for brachytherapy." Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Physics, 2009. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-6287.
Full textPurpose
Individual optimized treatment planning is recommended when creating treatment plans for brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Manual alteration of the dose distribution is time consuming and the treatment plan may be dependent on the person creating it. Inverse planning simulated anneahng (IPSA) is an algorithm that can optimize the dose distribution considering dose to several delineated structures. This algorithm, currently available in the treatment planning system Masterplan, has been evaluated for brachytherapy of cervical cancer. The Masterplan system simulates a source type from at different manufacturer than the type used for treatment at St. Olavs Hospital at the time being. The dose distribution from the two source types were evaluated to see if Masterplan an be used to simulate the source type used for treatment at St. Olavs Hospital.
Methods and materials
The dose distributions from the two source types were compared based on calcuations from two treatment planning systems (Masterplan and Plato) simulating each source type.
Dose measurements of the source used at St. Olavs Hospital for brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer were taken. These were compared with the dose distribution calculated by the two treatment planning systems.
At St. Olavs Hospital treatment are executed using a Fletcher type applicator. MR-images are taken with the applicator in place. Target and organs at risk are delineated in the images before the treatment planning is performed. For 11 patients treated with brachytherapy of cervical cancer at St. Olavs Hospital, three different IPSA-plans with different dose constraints (IPSA1, IPSA2 and IPSA3) and one treatment plan with equal dwell times were made in retrospect. All IPSA-plans constrain the same dose to the target. IPSA1 and IPSA3 have the same constraints to organs at risk, while IPSA2 allow a higher dose to the organs at risk. IPSA3 sets a limit for maximum dose in target volume. For evaluation of the quality of the treatment plans, dose parameters of chnical relevance were extracted from dose volume histograms.
Results
Deviations in the calculated dose distribution up to 30% is found for the two source types in certain areas. These deviations are found close to the source and below the connector end of the source. For distances ≥ 4 mm from the source center along one axis, deviations of the calculations were ≤ 4%. This is in correspondance with the measured dose values.
Target coverage for IPSA2 is 0.92. For IPSA1 and IPSA3 target coverage is 0.84 and 0.81 respectively. The number of treatment plans exceeding tolerance limit for one or more OAR is 82% for IPSA2, 55% for IPSA1 and 35% for IPSA3. The plan with equal dwell times have a target coverage of 0.66 and 45% of the treatment plans exceed the given tolerance limit for one or more organs at risk.
Conclusion
Deviations are found in the simulated dose distribution of the two source types tested, but only in clinical irrelevant areas for brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Masterplan can be used for simulating the dose distribution of the source used for treatment at St. Olavs Hospital.
Using IPSA is better when it comes to improving target coverage and not violating tolerance limit for organs at risk, than a conservative treatment plan with equal dwell times. Due to too high doses to organs at risk, IPSA2 should be rejected. IPSA1 has better target coverage and IPSA3 have lower dose to the organs at risk. To avoid inhomogeneities in dwell time values, IPSA3 is probably the best suggestion.
Sammendrag
Formål
Det er anbefalt & lage individuelt optimaliserte plan når behandlingsplaner skal lages i forbindelse med brachyterapi av livmorhalskreft. Manuell endring av dosefordelingen er tidkrevende og resultatet kan bli preget av personen som lager planen. 'Iverse planning simulated anneahng' (IPSA) er en algoritme som kan optimalisere dosefordehngen slik at dose til flere skisserte strukturer blir tatt hensyn til. Denne algoritmen, tilgjengehg i doseplanleggingssystemet Masterplan, har blitt vurdert for brachyterapi av livmorhalskreft.
Masterplan simulerer en kildetype fra en annen produsent enn den kildetypen som blir brukt til behandling på St. Olavs hospital i dag. Dosefordehngen til de to kildetypene har blitt vurdert for å se om Masterplan kan brukes til å simulere kildetypen brukt til behandling.
Metode og utstyr
Dosefordehngen fra de to kildetypene ble sammenlignet ved hjelp av doseberegninger fra to doseplanleggingssystemer (Masterplan og Plato) som simulerer hver sin kildetype.
Det ble tatt målinger av dosen fra kilden brukt på St. Olavs hospital til brachyterapi av livmorhalskreft. Disse ble sammenlignet med dosefordelingen regnet ut av de to planleggingssystemene.
På St. Olavs hospital blir en Fletcher type apphkator brukt til behandling. MR-bilder blir tatt etter at applikatoren er posisjonert. I bildene blir målvolum og risikooganer skissert før behandlingsplanleggingen gjennomføres. I denne studien har tre ulike IPSA-planer med forskjellig doserestriksjoner (IPSA1, IPSA2 and IPSA3) og en plan med lik liggetid i kildeposisjonene, blitt laget i ettertid for 11 pasienter behandlet for livmorhalskreft på St. Olavs hospital. IPSA-planene har samme doserestriksjoner til målvolum. IPSA1 og IPSA3 har samme begrensning til risikoorganer, mens IPSA2 tillater høyere dose til risikoorganer. IPSA3 har en begrensning for maksimum dose til volum for måvolumet. For vurdering av kvaliteten til planene ble klinisk relevante doseparametre funnet fra dosevolum-histogram.
Resultat
Det ble funnet avvik opp til 30% for beregnet dose i ulike punkt for de to kildetypene i visse omr&der. Disse avvikene ligger nærme kilden og rett under koblingsenden. For avstander ≥ 4 mm fra kildesenter transversalt på kilden er avvikene i beregningene ≤4%. Dosemålingene som ble tatt støtter dette.
Dekning av målvolum er 0.92 for IPSA2. For IPSA1 og IPSA3 er denne dekninjen henholdsvis 0.84 og 0.81. Antall planer hvor en definert grense for dosen til et eller flere risikoorgan har blitt oversteget, er 82% for IPSA2, 55% for IPSA1 og 35% for IPSA3. Planen hvor liggetidene er fordelt likt har malvolumdekning på 0.66 og 45% av planene overstiger den definerte toleranse grensen for et eller flere risikoorgan.
Konklusjon
Det ble funnet avvik i de simulerte dosefordelingene mellom de to kildetypene, men kun i klinisk irrelevante områder for brachyterapi av livmorhalskreft. Masterplan kan bli brukt til å simulere dosefordelingen til kilden som blir brukt til behandling på St. Olavs hospital.
Bruk av IPSA gir bedre resultater enn den konservative behandlingsplanen med lik liggetid ncir det gjelder dekning av målvolum og å overholde toleransegrensene som er satt for risikorganene. På grunn av for høye doser til risikoorganer burde IPSA2 forkastes. IPSA3 gir bedre dekning av måvolum mens IPSA3 gir lavere dose til risikoorganer. For å unngå store forskjeller mellom liggetidene i de ulike kildeposisjonene vil antagelig IPSA3 gi best utganspunkt for videre planlegging.
PASCOALINO, KELLY C. da S. "Estudo comparativo das respostas de diodos de Si para dosimetria de radiacao gama." reponame:Repositório Institucional do IPEN, 2010. http://repositorio.ipen.br:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9517.
Full textMade available in DSpace on 2014-10-09T14:07:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Dissertacao (Mestrado)
IPEN/D
Instituto de Pesquisas Energeticas e Nucleares - IPEN-CNEN/SP
Pollitt, David Frederic. "Performance evaluation of a second generation metaphase finder for chromosome-based radiation dosimetry." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/tape17/PQDD_0009/MQ32550.pdf.
Full textTölli, Heikki. "Ionization chamber dosimetry for brachytherapy evaluation of correction factors for absorbed dose determination /." Göteborg : Dept. of Radiation Physics, University of Göteborg, 1997. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/38990266.html.
Full textMeesat, Ridthee. "Evaluation of the radiosensitizing or radioprotective/antioxidant potential of some selected compounds by polyacrylamide gel dosimetry and Fricke dosimeter, and utilization of the femtosecond infrared laser pulse filamentation as a novel, powerful beam for cancer radiotherapy." Thèse, Université de Sherbrooke, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11143/6246.
Full textMARRE, DELPHINE. "Evaluation des perturbations induites sur la mesure de la dose absorbee avec des chambres d'ionisation, des dosimetres chimiques et des dosimetres thermoluminescents dans des faisceaux d'electrons de haute energie." Toulouse 3, 2000. http://www.theses.fr/2000TOU30083.
Full textBelanger, Philippe. "MR based frickle-gelatin dosimetry : uncertainty evaluation and computerised analysis of measured dose distributions." Thesis, McGill University, 2001. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=32759.
Full textPaudel, Nava R. "Nanoparticle-aided Radiation Therapy: Micro-dosimetry and Evaluation of the Mediators Producing Biological Damage." University of Toledo / OhioLINK, 2014. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1403142628.
Full textBooks on the topic "Dosimeters – Evaluation"
Holub, Robert F. Evaluation of the DOS1600 personal dosimeter. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1995.
Find full textHolub, Robert F. Evaluation of the DOS1600 personal dosimeter. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1995.
Find full textZeman, G. H. Preliminary evaluation of U.S. Army RADIAC detector DT-236/PD and RADIAC computer-indicator CP-696/UD. Bethesda, Md: Defense Nuclear Agency, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, 1986.
Find full textNational Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. The experimental basis for absorbed-dose calculations in medical uses of radionuclides: Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Bethesda, MD: The Council, 1985.
Find full textO, Hŏn-jin. Inchʻe mohyŏng pʻaentʻŏm ŭl iyong han chʻiryo pangsasŏn sŏllyang pʻyŏngka =: Evaluation of the dose in radiotherapy using anthropomorphic phantom. [Seoul]: Sikpʻum Ŭiyakpʻum Anjŏnchʻŏng Ŭiryo Kigi Pʻyŏngkabu Pangsasŏn Pʻyojuntʻim, 2007.
Find full textChŏng, Chin-uk. Chungjaejŏk pangsasŏn punya esŏŭi hwanja pʻipʻok sŏllyang pʻyŏngka =: Evaluation of patient dose in interventional radiology. [Seoul]: Sikpʻum Ŭiyakpʻum Anjŏnchʻŏng, 2007.
Find full textOffice, General Accounting. Veterans' benefits: Training for claims processors needs evaluation : report to the Honorable Lane Evans, ranking democratic member, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington 20013): The Office, 2001.
Find full textOffice, General Accounting. Veterans' benefits: Effective interaction needed within VA to address appeals backlog : report to Congressional requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1995.
Find full textOffice, General Accounting. Veterans benefits: Acquisition of information resources for modernization is premature : report to the Chairman, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1992.
Find full textOffice, General Accounting. Veterans' benefits: Basing survivors' compensation on veterans' disability is a viable option : report to Congressional committees. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1995.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Dosimeters – Evaluation"
Petilli, M., and D. M. Gilliam. "Evaluation of Uncertainties of 235U Fission Spectrum." In Reactor Dosimetry, 657–65. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5378-9_65.
Full textPetilli, M., and D. M. Gilliam. "Evaluation of Uncertainties of 235U Fission Spectrum." In Reactor Dosimetry, 657–65. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9726-0_13.
Full textLippincott, E. P., L. S. Kellogg, W. N. McElroy, and C. A. Baldwin. "Evaluation of Neutron Exposure Conditions for the Buffalo Reactor." In Reactor Dosimetry, 629–37. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5378-9_62.
Full textSakurai, K., and N. Yamano. "Evaluation of Gamma-Heating Rates in the JMTR Core." In Reactor Dosimetry, 667–80. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5378-9_66.
Full textLippincott, E. P., F. H. Ruddy, R. Gold, L. S. Kellogg, and J. H. Roberts. "Evaluation of Neutron Flux in the Pool Critical Assembly." In Reactor Dosimetry, 783–90. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5378-9_78.
Full textLippincott, E. P., L. S. Kellogg, W. N. McElroy, and C. A. Baldwin. "Evaluation of Neutron Exposure Conditions for the Buffalo Reactor." In Reactor Dosimetry, 629–37. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9726-0_10.
Full textLippincott, E. P., F. H. Ruddy, R. Gold, L. S. Kellogg, and J. H. Roberts. "Evaluation of Neutron Flux in the Pool Critical Assembly." In Reactor Dosimetry, 783–90. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9726-0_26.
Full textStallmann, F. W. "ORNL Evaluation of the ORR-PSF Metallurgical Experiment and “Blind Test." In Reactor Dosimetry, 175–83. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5378-9_16.
Full textSakurai, K., and N. Yamano. "Evaluation of Gamma-Heating Rates in the JMTR Core (Benchmark Calculation)." In Reactor Dosimetry, 667–80. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9726-0_14.
Full textSimons, R. L., L. S. Kellogg, E. P. Lippincott, and W. N. McElroy. "Re-Evaluation of the Physics-Dosimetry from PWR and BWR Reactor Pressure Vessel Surveillance Programs." In Reactor Dosimetry, 165–73. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5378-9_15.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Dosimeters – Evaluation"
Monteith, L. "97. Limitations of Weight Change Technique for Evaluation of Passive Dosimeters." In AIHce 1999. AIHA, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.3320/1.2763418.
Full textTsuchiya, K., K. Kuroki, K. Kurosawa, N. Akiba, K. Tonoike, G. Uchiyama, Y. Miyoshi, et al. "Evaluation of personal dosimeters and electronic modules under high-dose field." In 2010 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2010 NSS/MIC). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/nssmic.2010.5873812.
Full textMukherjee, Bhaskar. "Further evaluation of neutron skyshine dose in vicinity of the K1200 superconducting cyclotron of the NSCL using bubble dosimeters." In CYCLOCTRONS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS 2001: Sixteenth International Conference. AIP, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1435209.
Full textChung, C., M. Morandi, M. Afshar, and T. Stock. "65. Test Chamber and Protocol for the Evaluation of Passive Dosimeters at Sub-PPM Concentrations of VOCs with 24-Hour Sampling." In AIHce 1996 - Health Care Industries Papers. AIHA, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.3320/1.2765177.
Full textWester, Ulf. "Polysulphone and spore-film UV-dosimeters compared to two radiation transfer models and an instrument that measures the UV index: an evaluation for a UV-dosimetry study of preschool children in Stockholm." In Remote Sensing, edited by James R. Slusser, Klaus Schäfer, and Adolfo Comerón. SPIE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.690014.
Full textLee, SamLai, ByoungChul Kim, ChoonSung Yoo, and KeeOk Chang. "Monitoring of a Radiation Embrittlement by a Reliable Fluence Evaluation With a Neutron Dosimetry in a Reactor Pressure Vessel." In ASME 2006 Pressure Vessels and Piping/ICPVT-11 Conference. ASMEDC, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2006-icpvt-11-93500.
Full textBallesteros, A., J. Bros, L. Debarberis, F. Sevini, D. Erak, S. Gezashchenko, A. Kryukov, et al. "Assessment of Irradiation Conditions in WWER-440 (213) RPV Surveillance Location." In 12th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icone12-49477.
Full textZhou, Chuanyu. "A Deterministic Approach to Brachytherapy Dosimetry and a Benchmark Problem Implementation." In QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION. AIP, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1711671.
Full textHopkins, Daniel N., Eugene T. Hayes, and Arnold H. Ferro. "Ex-Vessel Neutron Dosimetry Results in the Vicinity of RPV Supports." In ASME 2007 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. ASMEDC, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2007-26785.
Full textDurkt, George. "Reducing the Noise Generated During Air-Arc Gouging Can Be as Simple as Flipping a Switch." In ASME 2009 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2009-12830.
Full textReports on the topic "Dosimeters – Evaluation"
Nugent, K. J., A. B. Ahmed, and P. G. Groer. Evaluation of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) of two different designs for beta particle and low energy photon dosimetry. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/6567527.
Full textHickman, D., A. Wysong, D. Heinrichs, C. Wong, M. Merritt, J. Topper, F. Gressmann, and D. Madden. Evaluation of LLNL's Nuclear Accident Dosimeters at the CALIBAN Reactor September 2010. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1033328.
Full textGunter, R. J. Evaluation of the neutron dosimeter used by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., ability to meet the requirements of the American National Standard for Personnel Neutron Dosimeters (neutron energies less than 20 MeV) ANSI N319-1976. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10163873.
Full textHerminghuysen, Kevin Ryan. Development and evaluation of a neutron-gamma mixed-field dosimetry system based on a single thermoluminescence dosimeter. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10188779.
Full textShaw, K. R. Evaluation of discrepancies between thermoluminescent dosimeter and direct-reading dosimeter results. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10177407.
Full textKinnison, R. Evaluation of environmental monitoring thermoluminescent dosimeter locations. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/138636.
Full textHeaton, H. T. II. Evaluation of NVLAP personnel dosimetry testing laboratory:. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nist.ir.90-4299.
Full textPiper, Roman K., and Robert I. Scherpelz. Functional Evaluation of the DOZA DKG-05D Electronic Dosimeter System. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/969177.
Full textJohnson, M. L. Evaluation of the Science Applications International Corporation PD-4 electronic dosimeter. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10110203.
Full textCummings, F. M., D. L. Haggard, and G. W. R. Endres. Evaluation of neutron dosimetry techniques for well-logging operations. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/5399666.
Full text