Books on the topic 'Drug patents'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Drug patents.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Environment, United States Congress House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health and the. Drug issues. U.S. G.P.O., 1988.
Find full textPatently innovative: How pharmaceutical firms use emerging patent law to extend monopolies on blockbuster drugs. Biohealthcare, 2012.
Find full textShachar, Josh Yehoshua. Frontiers in drug delivery: Pharmaco-kinesis collected patents. Pharmaco-Kinesis Corporation, 2010.
Find full textVoet, Martin A. The generic challenge: Understanding patents, FDA & pharmaceutical life-cycle management. 2nd ed. BrownWalker Press, 2008.
Find full textIntellectual property, pharmaceuticals and public health: Access to drugs in developing countries. Edward Elgar, 2011.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Human Resources. Animal Drug Amendments and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1986: Report together with minority views (to accompany S. 2407). U.S. G.P.O., 1986.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Human Resources. Animal Drug Amendments and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1986: Report together with minority views (to accompany S. 2407). U.S. G.P.O., 1986.
Find full textResources, United States Congress Senate Committee on Labor and Human. Animal Drug Amendments and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1986: Report together with minority views (to accompany S. 2407). U.S. G.P.O., 1986.
Find full textUnited States. Federal Trade Commission. Generic drug entry prior to patent expiration: An FTC study. W.S. Hein, 2003.
Find full textCommission, United States Federal Trade. Generic drug entry prior to patent expiration: An FTC study. U.S. FTC, 2002.
Find full textAmerican Bar Association. Section of Intellectual Property Law, ed. Pre-ANDA litigation: Strategies and tactics for developing a drug product and patent portfolio. ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law, 2014.
Find full textMansur, Yasmine Santos. Direito à propriedade intelectual versus saúde pública: O acesso a medicamentos. Editora Appris, 2011.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Human Resources. Animal Drug Amendments and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1986: Hearing before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2407 ... July 18, 1986. U.S. G.P.O., 1986.
Find full textResources, United States Congress Senate Committee on Labor and Human. Animal Drug Amendments and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1986: Hearing before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2407 ... July 18, 1986. U.S. G.P.O., 1986.
Find full textResources, United States Congress Senate Committee on Labor and Human. Animal Drug Amendments and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1986: Hearing before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2407 ... July 18, 1986. U.S. G.P.O., 1986.
Find full textYufen, Huang, ed. Nai mi yao wu chuan shu ji shu zhuan li di tu ji fen xi: Patent analysis of drug delivery nanotechnology. Guo jia shi yan yan jiu yuan ke ji zheng ce yan jiu yu zi xun zhong xin, 2005.
Find full textClosing the gaps in Hatch-Waxman: Assuring greater access to affordable pharmaceuticals : hearing before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, second session on examining certain provisions of the 1984 Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act, known as the Hatch-Waxman Act, assuring greater access to affordable pharmaceuticals, May 8, 2002. U.S. G.P.O., 2002.
Find full textAhn, Hyewon. Patentability of chemical selection inventions: The Olanzapine and Escitalopram decisions. Nomos, 2011.
Find full textLanjouw, Jean Olson. Patents, price controls, and access to new drugs: How policy affects global market entry. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. A bill to provide equitable relief for the generic drug industry, and for other purposes. [United States Government Printing Office], 1995.
Find full textBiologics and biosimilars: Balancing incentives for innovation : hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, July 14, 2009. U.S. G.P.O., 2010.
Find full textHanim, Lutfiyah. Membuka akses pada obat melalui pelaksanaan paten oleh pemerintah Indonesia. Third World Network, 2010.
Find full textKrekora, Magdalena. Contract manufacturing of medicines. 3rd ed. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2008.
Find full textSkinner, Brett J. Price controls, patents, and cross-border internet pharmacies: Risks to Canada's drug supply and international trading relations. Fraser Institute, 2006.
Find full textFollow-on biologics: Hearing of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, on examining Food and Drug Administration follow-on biologics, generally referred to as a biotechnology-derived protein drug (or biologic) that is comparable to a novel, previously approved biologic and that is approved with less supporting data than the innovator biologic, March 8, 2007. U.S. G.P.O., 2008.
Find full textKaphetzēs, Geōrgios N. Diplōmata euresitechnias pharmakōn: Hē eidikē metacheirisē tōn anaptyssomenōn chōrōn. Nomikē Vivliothēkē, 2013.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Pipeline drugs: Proposed remedies for relief in the Drug Patent Term Restoration Review Procedure Act of 1999 : hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Sixth Congress, first session, on S. 1172 ... August 4, 1999. U.S. G.P.O., 2000.
Find full textEmerging health care issues: Follow-on biologic drug competition : hearing before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, June 11, 2009. U.S. G.P.O., 2012.
Find full textKhor, Martin. Compulsory license and "government use" to promote access to medicines: Some examples. Third World Network, 2014.
Find full textA, Feinstein Richard, ed. Pay to delay: Are patent settlements that delay generic drug market entry anticompetitive? : hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, June 3, 2009. U.S. G.P.O., 2010.
Find full textDonghi, Monica. Patent strategy in pharmaceutical industry: Are additional patents valuable? Nomos, 2014.
Find full textHarnisch, Sandy. Die Zwangslizenz im südafrikanischen und deutschen Patentrecht: Ein Rechtsvergleich unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Arzneimittelerfindungen. BWV, Berliner Wiss.-Verl., 2006.
Find full textZárate, José Manuel Alvarez. Los monopolios patentarios y sus procedimientos judiciales. Biblioteca Jurídica Diké, 2002.
Find full textDeadly monopolies: The shocking corporate takeover of life itself, and the consequences for your health and our medical future. Doubleday, 2011.
Find full textGutiérrez, Daniel J. Follow-on biologics: Background and issues. Nova Science, 2011.
Find full textRegulating bioprospecting: Institutions for drug research, access, and benefit-sharing. United Nations University Press, 2005.
Find full textUnited, States Congress House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts Civil Liberties and the Administration of Justice. Lopid Patent Term Restoration and Fairness Act of 1987: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, first session, October 8, 1987. U.S. G.P.O., 1988.
Find full textExperiment Eleven: Dark secrets behind the discovery of a wonder drug. Walker & Co., 2012.
Find full textMaria Stela Pompeu Brasil Frota. Proteção de patentes de produtos farmacêuticos: O caso brasileiro. Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais, 1993.
Find full textZuccherino, Daniel R. Derecho de patentes, aislamiento o armonización: La patentabilidad de los productos farmacéuticos. Ad-Hoc, 1994.
Find full textZaveri, N. B. Patents for medicine: Balanced patent law, the need of the hour : issues/options before the nation and the parliament for patent law changes for 'TRIPs'. Indian Drug Manufacturers' Association, 1998.
Find full textHellerstein, Judith K. The demand for post-patent prescription pharmaceuticals. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1994.
Find full textProperty, United States Congress House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual. Patent Fairness Act of 1999: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, first session, on H.R. 1598, July 1, 1999. U.S. G.P.O., 2000.
Find full text