Books on the topic 'Dry mixture of concrete'

Concrete mixture proportioning: A scientific approach. London: E & FN Spon, 1999.

National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Meeting. Asphalt mixture design. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1992.

Kallas, Bernard F. Flexible pavement mixture design using reclaimed asphalt concrete. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Research, Development, and Technology, 1985.

Watt, Peter. Dry-finished concrete masonary party walls. Slough: Cement and Concrete Association, 1985.

Watt, Peter. Dry-finished concrete masonry party walls. Slough: Cement and Concrete Association, 1985.

Ontario. Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Conversion of existing concrete tower silos to dry grain storage. S.l: s.n, 1988.

National Cooperative Highway Research Program, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, United States. Federal Highway Administration, and Advanced Asphalt Technologies LLC, eds. Special mixture design considerations and methods for warm mix asphalt: A supplement to NCHRP report 673, A manual for design of hot mix asphalt with commentary. Washington, D.C: Transportation Research Board, 2012.

Turner, Frank R. A short history of the WW2 reinforced concrete floating dry docoks and reinforced "Accommodation Arks" designed by Mr Guy A. Maunsell and built under the supervision of Mr John A. Posford F.I.C.E.. Gravesend: F. R. Turner, 1997.

Concrete Mixture Proportioning. Routledge, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203976500.

Larrard, Fran de. Concrete Mixture Proportioning (Modern Concrete Technology). Taylor & Francis, 1999.

Kodeboyina, Ganesh Babu. Mathematical Modeling of Concrete Mixture Proportioning. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Kodeboyina, Ganesh Babu. Mathematical Modeling of Concrete Mixture Proportioning. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Kodeboyina, Ganesh Babu. Mathematical Modeling of Concrete Mixture Proportioning. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Kodeboyina, Ganesh Babu. Mathematical Modeling of Concrete Mixture Proportioning. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Mathematical Modeling of Concrete Mixture Proportioning. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure Research and Development., Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, Building and Fire Research Laboratory (U.S.). Building Materials Division., and Information Technology Laboratory (National Institute of Standards and Technology). Statistical Engineering Division., eds. Concrete mixture optimization using statistical methods: Final report. McLean, Va: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Research, Development and Technology, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, 2003.

Von Quintus, H. L. (Harold L.) and National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board., eds. Asphalt-aggregate mixture analysis system, AAMAS. Washington, D.C: Transportation Research Board, 1991.

(US), National Research Council. Asphalt Mixture Design (Transportation Research Record). Transportation Research Board, 1992.

H. L. Lharold L. L. Von Quintus. Asphalt-Aggregate Mixture Analysis System (Nchrp Report Series : No 338). Transportation Research Board National Resear, 1991.

United States. Bureau of Reclamation. Denver Office. Materials Engineering Branch., ed. Elastomeric canal sealants: Application to wet concrete : dry-damp-underwater study. Denver, Colo: Materials Engineering Branch, Research and Laboratory Services Division, Denver Office, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1993.

Fisher, David. Self-Healing Concrete. Materials Research Forum LLC, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21741/9781644901373.

Rudy, Adam, and Jan Olek. Optimization of Mixture Proportions for Concrete Pavements-Influence of Supplementary Cementitious Materials, Paste Content and Aggregate Gradation. Joint Transportation Research Program, 2012.

Asphalt rheology: Relationship to mixture : a symposium sponsored by ASTM Committee D-4 on Road and Paving Materials, Nashville, TN, 11 Dec. 1985. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 1987.

The 2006-2011 World Outlook for Lightweight Units of Structural Block Made with Concrete Weighing Less Than 105 Pounds Per Cubic Foot Dry Weight. Icon Group International, Inc., 2005.

Parker, Philip M. The 2007-2012 World Outlook for Normalweight Units of Structural Block Made with Concrete Weighing at Least 125 Pounds Per Cubic Foot Dry Weight. ICON Group International, Inc., 2006.

Parker, Philip M. The 2007-2012 World Outlook for Lightweight Units of Structural Block Made with Concrete Weighing Less Than 105 Pounds Per Cubic Foot Dry Weight. ICON Group International, Inc., 2006.

The 2006-2011 World Outlook for Mediumweight Units of Structural Block Made with Concrete Weighing at Least 105 Pounds but Less Than 125 Pounds Per Cubic Foot Dry Weight. Icon Group International, Inc., 2005.

Parker, Philip M. The 2007-2012 World Outlook for Mediumweight Units of Structural Block Made with Concrete Weighing at Least 105 Pounds but Less Than 125 Pounds Per Cubic Foot Dry Weight. ICON Group International, Inc., 2006.