Academic literature on the topic 'DTG'

The aim of the present study was to evaluate CD4/CD8 dynamics in patients on dolutegravir (DTG)-based two-drug regimens (2DRs) and compare them with DTG-containing triple-drug regimens (3DRs). A prospective observational study was performed in the context of the SCOLTA cohort. Experienced PWH with HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL were included if they were on the DTG-2DR, the DTG + tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) regimen, the DTG + tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/FTC regimen, or the DTG + abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) regimen; they were followed-up for at least one year. A total of 533 PWH were enrolled, 120 in the DTG + 3TC group, 38 in the DTG + protease inhibitors (PI) group, 67 in the DTG + rilpivirine (RPV) group, 49 in the DTG + TDF/FTC group, 27 in the DTG + TAF/FTC group, and 232 in the DTG + ABC/3TC group. After one year, the CD4/CD8 ratio significantly increased in the PWH treated with DTG + 3TC (+0.08 ± 0.26), DTG + TDF/FTC (+0.1 ± 0.19), and DTG + ABC/3TC (+0.08 ± 0.25). At two years, the CD4/CD8 increase was confirmed for PWH on DTG + TDF/FTC (+0.16 ± 0.28) and DTG + ABC/3TC (+0.1 ± 0.3). In the SCOLTA cohort, PWH on 2DRs experienced a CD4/CD8 increase only in the DTG + 3TC group. Controlled studies with longer follow-up will clarify the long-term immunological and clinical impacts of DTG-2DR.

Abstract Background Three-drug regimens (3DRs) have long been the mainstay of antiretroviral treatment (ART) for HIV. Dolutegravir-based two-drug regimens (DTG 2DRs) are now accepted alternatives to 3DRs, with the first 2DR single tablet regimen (STR), Juluca (DTG/rilpivirine [RPV]), FDA-approved in 2017. This study evaluated treatment patterns of DTG+RPV in clinical practice to understand use prior to availability of DTG/RPV STR. Methods A retrospective medical chart review was conducted across 10 US sites identified as using any DTG 2DRs. Eligible patients were adults initiated on DTG 2DR prior to July 31, 2017 and followed up to January 30, 2018. This analysis describes a subgroup who received DTG+RPV 2DR. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment history were abstracted from medical charts. Analyses were descriptive. Results From an overall sample of 278 DTG 2DR patients, 66 received DTG+RPV 2DR. In this DTG+RPV subgroup, mean age was 56 years, 79% were male and 68% were Caucasian. Most were treatment-experienced (97%), with an average 15.5 years of prior ART; 48% had received ≥ 4 prior regimens. The most common physician reported reasons for initiating DTG+RPV were avoidance of potential long-term toxicities (53%), toxicity/intolerance of ARVs (20%) and treatment simplification/streamlining (15%). Prior to initiation of DTG+RPV, 70% of patients were virologically suppressed (< 50 copies/mL); of those, 98% remained suppressed after switching to DTG+RPV. Of the 30% of patients with detectable viral load prior to DTG+RPV initiation, 60% achieved and maintained virologic suppression on DTG+RPV. Mean time on DTG+RPV was 1.6 years. Only 5 (8%) patients discontinued DTG+RPV by data cut-off, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Reasons for discontinuation were virologic failure (n = 2), treatment simplification/streamlining (n = 2) and toxicity/intolerance (n = 1). Physicians reported that most patients (91%) achieved the desired outcome from DTG+RPV use. Conclusion Prior to commercial availability of DTG/RPV STR in the United States, DTG+RPV was used primarily in treatment experienced patients, most commonly to avoid potential long-term toxicities. A high proportion of patients achieved the desired outcome and maintained virologic suppression while receiving DTG+RPV. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency of central nervous system adverse events (CNS-AE) on dolutegravir (DTG) and non-DTG containing ART, and their reversibility, in the observational prospective SCOLTA cohort. Factors associated with CNS-AE were estimated using a Cox proportional-hazards model. 4939 people living with HIV (PLWH) were enrolled in DTG (n = 1179) and non-DTG (n = 3760) cohorts. Sixty-six SNC-AE leading to ART discontinuation were reported, 39/1179 (3.3%) in DTG and 27/3760 (0.7%) in non-DTG cohort. PLWH naïve to ART, with higher CD4 + T count and with psychiatric disorders were more likely to develop a CNS-AE. The risk was lower in non-DTG than DTG-cohort (aHR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19–0.55, p < 0.0001). One-year follow-up was available for 63/66 PLWH with CNS-AE. AE resolution was reported in 35/39 and 23/24 cases in DTG and non-DTG cohorts, respectively. The probability of AE reversibility was not different based on ART class, sex, ethnicity, CDC stage, or baseline psychiatric disorder. At the same time, a lower rate of event resolution was found in PLWH older than 50 years (p = 0.017). In conclusion, CNS-AE leading to ART discontinuation was more frequent in DTG than non-DTG treated PLWH. Most CNS-AE resolved after ART switch, similarly in both DTG and non-DTG cohorts.

Background Rising resistance of HIV-1 to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) threatens the success of the global scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART). The switch to WHO-recommended dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens could reduce this threat due to DTG’s high genetic barrier to resistance. We used mathematical modeling to predict the impact of the scale-up of DTG-based ART on NNRTI pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) in South Africa, 2020 to 2040. Methods and findings We adapted the Modeling Antiretroviral drug Resistance In South Africa (MARISA) model, an epidemiological model of the transmission of NNRTI resistance in South Africa. We modeled the introduction of DTG in 2020 under 2 scenarios: DTG as first-line regimen for ART initiators, or DTG for all patients, including patients on suppressive NNRTI-based ART. Given the safety concerns related to DTG during pregnancy, we assessed the impact of prescribing DTG to all men and in addition to (1) women beyond reproductive age; (2) women beyond reproductive age or using contraception; and (3) all women. The model projections show that, compared to the continuation of NNRTI-based ART, introducing DTG would lead to a reduction in NNRTI PDR in all scenarios if ART initiators are started on a DTG-based regimen, and those on NNRTI-based regimens are rapidly switched to DTG. NNRTI PDR would continue to increase if DTG-based ART was restricted to men. When given to all men and women, DTG-based ART could reduce the level of NNRTI PDR from 52.4% (without DTG) to 10.4% (with universal DTG) in 2040. If only men and women beyond reproductive age or on contraception are started on or switched to DTG-based ART, NNRTI PDR would reach 25.9% in 2040. Limitations include substantial uncertainty due to the long-term predictions and the current scarcity of knowledge about DTG efficacy in South Africa. Conclusions Our model shows the potential benefit of scaling up DTG-based regimens for halting the rise of NNRTI resistance. Starting or switching all men and women to DTG would lead to a sustained decline in resistance levels, whereas using DTG-based ART in all men, or in men and women beyond childbearing age, would only slow down the increase in levels of NNRTI PDR.

Abstract Background The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF), dolutegravir (DTG)+FTC/TAF, DTG/lamivudine (3TC), and DTG/rilpivirine (RPV) are all used for treatment of HIV-infected patients. Here, relative time to in vitro viral breakthrough (VB) and resistance barrier using simulated human drug exposures at either full or suboptimal treatment adherence to each regimen were compared. Methods Wild-type HIV-1 (IIIb)-infected MT-2 cells were exposed to the combinations of BIC+FTC+TAF, DTG+FTC+TAF, DTG+3TC, or DTG+RPV for up to 35 days or until VB. Fixed drug concentrations were the human plasma-free adjusted clinical trough concentrations (Cmin) or fixed at simulated Cmin after missing 1 to 4 consecutive doses (Cmin-1 to -4), with many replicates. Drug resistance was studied by next-generation sequencing at ≥2% frequency. Results At drug concentrations corresponding to full adherence and 1 missed dose (Cmin and Cmin-1), no VB occurred with any regimen (Table). At Cmin-2, only DTG+3TC had VB, with some emergent resistance to both drugs. At Cmin-3, all regimens had VB: by day 12, 100% of DTG+3TC wells had VB; for BIC+FTC+TAF, DTG+FTC+TAF, and DTG+RPV, < 15% of wells had VB which began after day 14. Emergent RT or IN resistance was seen for DTG+RPV and DTG+3TC but not for BIC+FTC+TAF or DTG+FTC+TAF. At Cmin-4, all DTG+3TC and DTG+FTC+TAF wells had VB by day 12, while DTG+RPV had 94% VB by day 25 and BIC+FTC+TAF had 50% VB by day 35. Emergent Cmin-4 drug resistance was seen for all regimens but at differing frequencies; DTG+RPV had the most wells with resistance. Cumulatively, emergent RT and/or IN resistance was found in 1.3% BIC+FTC+TAF, 2.5% DTG+FTC+TAF, 7.9% DTG+3TC, and 8.8% DTG+RPV cultures. Summary of Forgiveness and Barrier to Resistance of INSTI-Containing Regimens Conclusion Regimen forgiveness and resistance barrier are important factors in long term treatment. These INSTI-based regimens had high in vitro forgiveness and resistance barriers with concentrations simulating high adherence. When multiple missed doses were simulated in vitro, BIC+FTC+TAF had the highest forgiveness and barrier to resistance. When compared to DTG+3TC and DTG+FTC+TAF, DTG+RPV had higher forgiveness but lower resistance barrier after several simulated missed doses. Disclosures Rima K. Acosta, BS, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Andrew Mulato, BS, MBA, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Michelle L. D’Antoni, PhD, Gilead Sciences (Employee, Shareholder)Gilead Sciences, Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Stephen R. Yant, PhD, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Tomas Cihlar, PhD, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Kirsten L. White, PhD, Gilead Sciences, Inc (Employee, Shareholder)

Background. Dolutegravir-based 2-drug regimens (DTG 2DRs) are now accepted as alternatives to 3-drug regimens for HIV antiretroviral treatment (ART); however, literature on physician drivers for prescribing DTG 2DR is sparse. This study evaluated treatment patterns of DTG 2DR components in clinical practice in the US. Methods. This was a retrospective chart review in adult patients in care in the US with HIV-1 who received DTG 2DR prior to July 31, 2017, with follow-up until January 30, 2018. Primary objectives of the study were to determine reasons for patients initiating DTG 2DR and to describe the demographics and clinical characteristics. All analyses were descriptive. Results. Overall, 278 patients received DTG 2DR (male: 70%; mean age: 56 years). Most patients were treatment experienced (98%), with a mean 13.5 years of prior ART. DTG was most commonly paired with darunavir (55%) or rilpivirine (27%). The most common physician-reported reasons for initiating DTG 2DR were treatment simplification/streamlining (30%) and avoidance of potential long-term toxicities (20%). Before starting DTG 2DR, 42% of patients were virologically suppressed; of those, 95% maintained suppression while on DTG 2DR. Of the 50% of patients with detectable viral load before DTG 2DR, 79% achieved and maintained virologic suppression on DTG 2DR during follow-up. There were no virologic data for 8% of patients prior to starting DTG 2DR. Only 15 patients discontinued DTG 2DR, of whom 4 (27%) discontinued due to virologic failure. Conclusions. Prior to commercial availability of the single-tablet 2DRs, DTG 2DR components were primarily used in treatment-experienced patients for treatment simplification and avoidance of long-term toxicities. Many of these patients achieved and maintained virologic suppression, with low discontinuation rates.