Relevant bibliographies by topics / Ecuador-Peru Conflict, 1995

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Ecuador-Peru Conflict, 1995'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 26 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Ecuador-Peru Conflict, 1995.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Ecuador-Peru Conflict, 1995"

1

Kusumah Anshary, Ahmad Daniel. "Perang Ekuador dan Peru Tahun 1995." Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies 1, no. 2 (2021): 111–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v1i2.37.

Full text
Abstract:
This study tries to explain the reasons why Peru and Ecuador went to war with each other in 1995, even though both are democracies. The research was conducted concerning Immanuel Kant's Democratic Peace Theory by examining norms and institutions as essential factors in developing his theory. This study uses qualitative research with literature review and interview methods. The study will focus on the conditions of norms and institutions in Peru and Ecuador in 1995, the year the two countries decided to go to war with each other. Based on the research results, it is known that democratic norms and institutions owned by Ecuador and Peru have not been able to create peace as has been assumed by Immanuel Kant in the Democratic Peace Theory. Although Ecuador has democratic institutions that can reduce the authority of its leaders in decision-making, the domestic democratic norms established in the 1830 Constitutional Law cannot make the Ecuadorian people's support refer to peace in overcoming the Cenepa border conflict. On the contrary, in Peru, democratic norms that prefer to negotiate and make peace are not followed by the effectiveness of the role of democratic institutions that cannot limit President Fujimori's authority, who chooses to carry out attacks in border areas which then triggers a war.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Borzova, Alla Yu, and Vinicio X. Medina Gonzalez. "The Role of Mediation in Resolving Conflicts Between Ecuador and Peru." Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 23, no. 2 (2023): 296–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-2-296-306.

Full text
Abstract:
The study deals with the problem of mediation in the settlement of the longest territorial conflict in Latin America between Peru and Ecuador, highlighting its origins. The main goal of conflict resolution is not only the elimination of the conflict itself, but the transformation of a real conflict situation into a peaceful process of social or political change, where mediation is a strategy or a tool to end the conflict. The authors use an integrated approach, where the most appropriate theoretical basis for considering and resolving these conflicts is neoliberalism, as well as the problem-chronological approach, the historical method, which makes it possible to trace the prerequisites and the development of the territorial conflict, and mediation efforts to resolve it. It was concluded that the Ecuadorian-Peruvian war, although it was the result of the perception of divergent territorial interests, was caused by the unsuccessful mediation activities of the guarantor countries (Brazil, USA, Chile and Argentina). The mediation activities of Brazil, the USA, Chile and Argentina in 1995-1998 led to the so-called “elegant agreement,” one way or another taking into account the interests of Peru and Ecuador. In this regard, the special importance of the mediation activities of the guarantor countries in resolving the conflict was emphasized, as well as their main tools, such as: negotiation processes, signing documents on the territorial dispute, participating in the demarcation of borders, monitoring compliance with the agreements reached, contributing to the active development of Ecuadorian-Peruvian relations after the signing of the peace treaty and preventing the escalation of the conflict in the future. As a result of the consideration of the role of each intermediary country in the settlement of the Alto Cenepa conflict, their own interests were touched and the key areas of participation in peacekeeping activities were listed, and it was concluded that Brazil’s position was the most active.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Spencer, David. "Peru‐Ecuador 1995: The evolution of military tactics from the conflict of 1981." Small Wars & Insurgencies 9, no. 3 (1998): 129–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592319808423222.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Duarte, Samuel Correa. "As relações de paz e guerra entre Peru e Equador no contexto do complexo de segurança regional / The relations of peace and war between Peru and Ecuador in the context of regional security complex." Mural Internacional 7, no. 2 (2017): 117–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rmi.2016.24824.

Full text
Abstract:
O presente estudo procura analisar os acontecimentos centrais relativos à Guerra do Cenepa ocorrida em 1995 na fronteira entre Peru e Equador, situando a mesma no contexto da segurança regional do complexo americano. Argumentamos que a Guerra do Cenepa produziu três resultados básicos: apontou para a existência de uma balança de poder entre os dois países; não gerou nenhuma alteração substancial no conteúdo do tratado firmado anteriormente sobre a fronteira na base do Rio Cenepa; nem tampouco implicou em transferência de território. Então, como podemos explicar a dinâmica do conflito entre Peru e Equador? A tese central da análise que será aqui empreendida é que, em primeiro lugar, um padrão recorrente de hostilidades favorece um comportamento ofensivo e, em segundo lugar, a certeza sobre a balança de poder favorece as negociações. Como tese subjacente defendemos que a prevalência da hegemonia norte-americana contribuiu para o desenlace do conflito.ABSTRACTThe present study aims to analyze the central events related to the Cenepa War that occurred in 1995 on the border between Peru and Ecuador, into regional security of the American complex. We argue that the Cenepa War produced three basic results: pointed to the existence of a balance of power between the two countries; did not generate any substantial change in the content of the previously signed treaty on the border at the base of the Rio Cenepa; nor did it entail transfer of territory. How can we explain the dynamics of the conflict between Peru and Ecuador? Central thesis of the analysis that will be undertaken here is that, first, a recurrent pattern of hostility favors offensive behavior, and secondly, certainty about the balance of power favors negotiations. As an underlying thesis, we argue that the prevalence of US hegemony contributed to the outcome of the conflict.Palavras-chave: segurança regional; fronteira; conflito. Keywords: regional security; border; conflict.Recebido em 26 de Julho de 2016 | Aceito em 07 de Agosto de 2017Received on July 26, 2016 | Accepted on August 7, 2017DOI: 10.12957/rmi.2016.24824
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Bustamante, Fernando. "Ecuador: Putting an End to Ghosts of the Past?" Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 34, no. 4 (1992): 195–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/165809.

Full text
Abstract:
In 1991, Ecuador's foreign policy had to deal with the revival of its old border conflict with Peru. Nevertheless, this time the situation offered some hope — in contrast to previous occasions, the most recent being the Paquisha incident in 1982 — that the longstanding impasse between the two countries, which had hindered closer cooperation and greater integration for decades, might be nearing some sort of resolution at last.During the first two years of his administration, President Rodrigo Borja and his Foreign Minister Diego Cordovez were primarily concerned with incorporating Ecuador into some of the Latin American efforts at international cooperation — political, economic, and commercial — which had emerged during the 1980s, such as the Rio Group, or which had been redefined and advanced in new, more creative forms, such as those exemplified by the Cartagena Group, the Asociación Latinoamericana de Integratión (ALADI), the proposed Andean Free Trade Zone, and the like.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Jaskoski, Maiah. "In the Wake of War: Democratization and Internal Armed Conflict in Latin America. Edited by Cynthia J. Arnson. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012. 320p. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper. - Power, Institutions, and Leadership in War and Peace: Lessons from Peru and Ecuador, 1995–1998. By David R. Mares and David Scott Palmer. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2012. 202p. $55.00. - Violence, Coercion, and State-Making in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Edited by Wil G. Pansters. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012. 400p. $70.00." Perspectives on Politics 11, no. 2 (2013): 688–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1537592713000790.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Valdivieso, Cristian Daniel, and Edwin Bladimir Aldana. "El Proceso de Superación Del Conflicto entre Ecuador Y Peru de 1995." Revista Aurora 10, no. 2 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.04.p49.

Full text
Abstract:
El artículo presenta como objeto de estudio el proceso de resolución del conflicto armadoentre Ecuador y Perú ocurrido a inicios del año de 1995. De este modo, el objetivoesanalizar cómo se desarrolló el proceso de resolucióndel litigio fronterizo e identificar qué elementos fueron empleados para la consolidación de una paz duradera.La metodología a ser aplicada se basa en el análisis documental de fuentes primarias y secundarias, siendo abordadas bajo un lente cualitativo.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Valdivieso, Cristian, and Jéssica Dos Santos. "Equador E As Novas Ameaças: Uma Leitura A Partir Dos Documentos De Defesa." Revista Neiba, Cadernos Argentina Brasil 9, no. 1 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/neiba.2020.50549.

Full text
Abstract:
Desde o final da década de 1990, o Equador tem renovado sua política de defesa. Passando pela superação do conflito com o Peru, o setor de defesa incluiu o combate às ‘novas ameaças’ como uma forma de combater os diversos focos de violência provenientes do cenário global e regional. O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar o impacto das novas ameaças na formulação da política de defesa do Equador compreendida entre o período 2002 e 2018. Para tal efeito, analisam-se documentos oficiais como os Livros Brancos de Defesa (2002, 2006, 2018) e as Agendas Políticas de Defesa (2011, 2014-2017), marcos gerais da política de defesa equatoriana.Palavras-chave: Equador; Política de Defesa; novas ameaças.AbstractSince the late 1990s, the Ecuador has renewed its defense policy. In overcoming the conflict with Peru, the defense sector included combating ‘new threats’ as a way of combating the various outbreaks of violence from the global and regional scene. This work aims to analyze the impact of new threats on the formulation of Ecuador's defense policy between the period 2002 and 2018. For this purpose, official documents such as the White Papers of Defense (2002, 2006, 2018) and the Political Defense Agendas (2011, 2014-2017) will be analyzed, general milestones of Ecuadorian defense policy.Keywords: Ecuador; defense policy; new threats.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Ecuador-Peru Conflict, 1995"

1

Bignon, François. "La guerre entre le Pérou et l’Équateur et la nationalisation des frontières andines (1933-1945)." Thesis, Rennes 2, 2020. http://www.bu.univ-rennes2.fr/system/files/theses/2020theseBignonFComplet.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
La mémoire de la guerre qui opposa les armées du Pérou et de l’Équateur en juillet et août 1941 a été opacifiée par la conflagration mondiale et par des récits nationalistes irréconciliables. À partir de l’usage croisé d’archives diplomatiques, militaires et médiatiques, ce travail entend pratiquer une approche totale de cet événement qui a contribué de manière décisive à la formation des deux nations. Les batailles de 1941 s’inscrivent ainsi dans un long processus régional de nationalisation des frontières, entendue comme étatisations concurrentes et injonction à adopter une identité nationale exclusive, là où les populations transfrontalières étaient traditionnellement binationales ou anationales. Ce moment est pour ces dernières et pour les partis politiques dans leur ensemble, l’occasion de revendiquer leur enracinement national. Les deux États andins ont de cette façon été en mesure de réaliser la promesse de faire nation jusque dans les régions frontalières où leur emprise était encore limitée, particulièrement en Amazonie, tout en les intégrant au répertoire de l’imaginaire national. Cet aboutissement imparfait a été accompagné par le développement d’une bureaucratie d’État, dominée par les armées qui déployaient ainsi leur ambition sociale d’institution totale, de même que par le système international panaméricain partageant la mystique de la frontière, qui y perfectionna ses instruments de sécurité collective. Aux frontières caractérisées par leur indéfinition nationale et géographique, s’est de la sorte substituée une ligne consensuelle et intériorisée. Le conflit andin ferme alors un cycle continental ouvert par les indépendances<br>The memory of the war that opposed Peru’s and Ecuador’s armies from July to August 1941 has been darkened by the global blast and nationalist irreconcilable accounts. This study intends to do a total approach of the event that decisively shaped both nations by analyzing diplomatic, military, and media data. The 1941 battles are part of a longstanding regional process of nationalizing the borderlands, understood as state-building and the mandate to adopt exclusive national identity, where transborder populations were traditionally bi-national or no-national. This particular moment has been seized by those populations and by all political parties as a way to claim their national roots. Both Andean states were able to achieve the promise of nation-building even in borderlands where their presence had been extremely limited, specially in the Amazon region, integrating them into the imagined community. This incomplete fulfillment has been driven by the making of a state bureaucracy dominated by the armies that deployed their social ambition of a total institution, as by the international Pan-American system sharing the same border ideal, that improved its instruments of collective security. Borderlands defined by a lack of national and geographical definitions were replaced by a consensual and interiorized borderline. The Andean conflict may have closed a continental cycle that started with the process of independence
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Ecuador-Peru Conflict, 1995"

1

Saltos, Cecilia Viera. Ecuador en guerra, 1995. Publicaciones de Interés Social, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Klepak, H. P. Confidence building sidestepped: The Peru-Ecuador conflict of 1995. Center for International and Security Studies, York University, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Pazzos, Frank Vargas. Tiwintza: Toda la verdad. s.n., 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ramos, José Albán. Héroes del Cenepa. Maza Editores, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Coronado, Eduardo Fournier. Tiwinza con zeta: Toda la verdad. [s.n.], 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

V, Francisco Sampedro. El espacio territorial ecuatoriano de 1830 a 1995, con la Guerra del Cenepa desatada por el Perú: Auténtica historia de límites. DIMAXI, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Los chatarreros del Cenepa. Editorial Jurídica Míguez & Mosquera, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Aguirre, David Andrade. Victoria en el Cenepa. Ejército Ecuatoriano, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Victoria en el Cenepa. Centro de Estudios Historicos del Ejército], 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

La paz por dentro: Ecuador-Perú : testimonio de una negociación. Universidad de Alcalá, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Ecuador-Peru Conflict, 1995"

1

Martínez-Alier, Joan. "A Barcelona School of Ecological Economics and Political Ecology." In Studies in Ecological Economics. Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22566-6_2.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe first 21 years of my life were spent in Barcelona (all of them under General Franco’s regime, since I was born in 1939). The following 14 years I spent in Oxford, Stanford, in Andalusia and again in Oxford (St. Antony’s College) until 1973. In between, long stays in Cuba, Peru and Brazil and some periods in Paris, with the publishing house of Ruedo ibérico. At 35 years of age and feeling rather defeated by the lack of “transitional justice” in Spain after Franco’s death, I came back to Barcelona, with a chair in the new Universitat Autònoma (UAB) in Economics and Economic History, which I held until I was 70 years of age. I continued my travels in the sabbatical years, to Oxford in 1984–1985, Stanford again in 1988–1989, to Ecuador (the Flacso in Quito) in 1995–1995, to Yale University in 1999–2000 and in the meantime also often to India after my first visit in 1988. My interests and my books followed this trajectory, first some books on agrarian history and land conflicts in Andalusia, Cuba and Peru between 1968 and 1977, then between 1984 and 2022 many books on ecological economics and political ecology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography