Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Egalitarian theory

Contents

Journal articles

Academic literature on the topic 'Egalitarian theory'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 11 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Egalitarian theory.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Egalitarian theory"

1

Shapiro, Daniel. "EGALITARIANISM AND WELFARE-STATE REDISTRIBUTION." Social Philosophy and Policy 19, no. 1 (2002): 1–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265052502191023.

Full text

Abstract:

A central idea of contemporary philosophical egalitarianism's theory of justice is that involuntary inequalities or disadvantages—those that arise through no choice or fault of one's own—should be minimized or rectified in some way. Egalitarians believe that the preferred institutional vehicle for fulfilling these obligations of justice is some form of a welfare state. Of course, contemporary egalitarians disagree about the best way to interpret or understand their theory of justice and institutions: Which inequalities are chosen and which are unchosen? What form of a welfare state will best s

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Cho, Hyun June. "The Force of Non-violence and an Egalitarian Imaginary." Criticism and Theory Society of Korea 26, no. 1 (2021): 185–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.19116/theory.2021.26.1.185.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. "Is it unjust that elderly people suffer from poorer health than young people? Distributive and relational egalitarianism on age-based health inequalities." Politics, Philosophy & Economics 18, no. 2 (2019): 145–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470594x19828020.

Full text

Abstract:

In any normal population, health is unequally distributed across different age groups. Are such age-based health inequalities unjust? A divide has recently developed within egalitarian theories of justice between relational egalitarians focusing on the egalitarian nature of social relations and luck egalitarians focusing on the distribution of goods such as welfare or resources. I argue that the most plausible versions of these two theories – ‘whole lives’ luck egalitarianism and time-relative relational egalitarianism – imply conflicting answers to the opening question. Under realistic condit

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Hunt, Ian. "How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice?" Philosophical Papers 39, no. 2 (2010): 155–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2010.503444.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Rakos, Richard F. "Socialism, Behavioral Theory, and the Egalitarian Society." Behavior Analysis and Social Action 7, no. 1-2 (1989): 23–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03406104.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Lindsay, Ira K. "A DEFENSE OF HUMEAN PROPERTY THEORY." Legal Theory 27, no. 1 (2021): 36–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1352325221000033.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACTTwo rival approaches to property rights dominate contemporary political philosophy: Lockean natural rights and egalitarian theories of distributive justice. This article defends a third approach, which can be traced to the work of David Hume. Unlike Lockean rights, Humean property rights are not grounded in pre-institutional moral entitlements. In contrast to the egalitarian approach, which begins with highly abstract principles of distributive justice, Humean theory starts with simple property conventions and shows how more complex institutions can be justified against a background of

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

HODGSON, LOUIS-PHILIPPE. "Justice as Luck Egalitarian Fairness?" Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie 58, no. 4 (2019): 741–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0012217319000052.

Full text

Abstract:

In A Conceptual Investigation of Justice, Kyle Johannsen maintains that the strongest version of John Rawls’s theory of justice is one that incorporates the luck egalitarian conception of fairness developed by G.A. Cohen. He also contends that, once the theory is modified in this way, it becomes clear that the original position doesn’t yield principles of justice but rather what Cohen calls ‘rules of regulation.’ I argue that the minimal conception of fairness that Rawls favours is the right one for his purposes, and that bringing in luck egalitarian fairness would render the outcome of the or

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

King, Lynda A., and Daniel W. King. "Sex-Role Egalitarian Ism Scale." Psychology of Women Quarterly 21, no. 1 (1997): 71–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00101.x.

Full text

Abstract:

The Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale (SRES) was developed to measure attitudes toward the equality of women and men across content domains representing marital, parental, employment, social-interpersonal-heterosexual, and educational roles. The instrument exists in four versions: two alternate 95-item full forms and two alternate 25-item abbreviated forms. Reliability indices derived from a classical test-theory approach, multifaceted generalizability procedures, and an item-response theory-based analysis all support consistency or precision of measurement. Evidence for convergent, discriminant,

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

CAPPELEN, ALEXANDER W., and BERTIL TUNGODDEN. "A LIBERAL EGALITARIAN PARADOX." Economics and Philosophy 22, no. 3 (2006): 393–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266267106001039.

Full text

Abstract:

A liberal egalitarian theory of justice seeks to combine the values of equality, personal freedom, and personal responsibility. It is considered a much more promising position than strict egalitarianism, because it supposedly provides a fairness argument for inequalities reflecting differences in choice. However, we show that it is inherently difficult to fulfill this ambition. We present a liberal egalitarian paradox which shows that there does not exist any robust reward system that satisfies a minimal egalitarian and a minimal liberal requirement. Moreover, we demonstrate how libertarianism

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Pierik, Roland, and Ingrid Robeyns. "Resources versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory." Political Studies 55, no. 1 (2007): 133–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00646.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!