Relevant bibliographies by topics / Electronic evidence in civil proceedings

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Electronic evidence in civil proceedings'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 24 April 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Electronic evidence in civil proceedings.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Electronic evidence in civil proceedings"

1

Vladimirovich, Bilalov Alexey, Golubtsov Valery Gennadievich, Makolkin Nikita Nikolayevich, and Khasanshin Ramil Ilgizovich. "Electronic evidence in civil proceedings." Laplage em Revista 6, Extra-A (December 14, 2020): 23–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.24115/s2446-622020206extra-a551p.23-27.

Full text
Abstract:
This article examines the issues of electronic evidence - their legal nature, the procedure for a party disclosing and evaluation by the court. The author analyzes the works of both Russian and foreign experts on civil procedure, as well as on the issues of electronic technology. Furthermore, the authors have examined the previous related studies of Russian and foreign scholars, legislation of Great Britain, Germany, France and European experience represented by EU directives. In this study, it is attempted to consider not only the issues of exclusively legal analysis, but also the philosophy of proof. This term is actively used in foreign legal science, and there is a much broader legal methodology, that is, a general scientific methodology and an interdisciplinary approach are used actively.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Green, Elena Anatolievna. "Electronic evidence in civil proceedings." Аграрное и земельное право, no. 12 (2021): 229–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.47643/1815-1329_2021_12_229.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Emaltynov, Andrey R. "Some Problems of the Evaluation of Electronic Evidence in the Electronic Justice System." Arbitrazh-civil procedure 5 (May 20, 2021): 31–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-5-31-35.

Full text
Abstract:
The article covers some aspects of evaluation of e-еvidences in arbitration and civil proceedings. These problems are particularly actual during application of restrictive measures against Covid-19. New technologies have caused transformation organizational and substantive aspects of evidences institution in legal proceedings. Author points specialtys evaluation of relevance, admissibility, reliability of e-еvidences, significance e-document and electronic image form, correlation between e-еvidences and others forms of evidence in arbitration and civil proceedings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Tatulych, Iryna. "Electronic evidence as a means of evidence in civil proceedings." Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, no. 1 (April 15, 2020): 215–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.1.2020.43.

Full text
Abstract:
The article deals with the analysis of electronic evidence as a new means of evidence in civil proceedings. Due to the constant changes of the information environment and the improvement of information technologies there arises the question of consolidating the evidence obtained in the information space. The example of this evidence is the electronic evidence that provides information in electronic (digital) form containing information about the circumstances that matter to the case. There is defined, for the first time, the electronic evidence and the procedure for its submission and investigation at the legislative level. In procedural law such innovations are one of the means of achieving the effectiveness of civil justice, as they facilitate the full, comprehensive consideration and resolution of a civil lawsuit, the establishment of the true circumstances of the case, and the adoption of lawful and grounded decisions by courts, which is the purpose of civil justice. Electronic evidence is submitted to the court in three ways: in the original, in the electronic copy certified by an electronic digital signature, in paper copies, certified in the manner prescribed by law. Besides, the party submitting a copy of the electronic evidence must indicate that he/ she or some other person has the original of the electronic evidence. It is the responsibility of the claimant to attach to the statement of claim all the evidence available to support the circumstances on which the claim is based (if written or electronic evidence is provided, the claimant may attach a copy of the relevant evidence to the statement of claim). The claimant can submit electronic evidence using the Unified Court Information and Telecommunication System. In the article, there are highlighted the issues of the concept, nature and types of electronic evidence, the views of scientists on the features and significance of electronic evidence in civil proceedings. Moreover, the article focuses on problematic issues that the legislator should regulate to ensure that participants of the case are able to submit electronic evidence to court and implement their constitutional right to judicial protection. To reach these goals there were analyzed the views of scientists who investigated this type evidence. Unfortunately, the current CCP of Ukraine and other by-laws regulating the Institute of Electronic Evidence do not provide answers to many questions about the use of evidence from purely technical to legal ones. The legislator limited the work only to the general principles of applying a new type of evidence. Therefore, the judicial practice today is controversial when deciding whether electronic evidence is admissible and appropriate. Also in the article there is analyzed the judicial practice regarding the presentation of electronic evidence as the means of evidence to the court by the parties of the case. According to the results of theoretical study, there were made some suggestions to improve the civil procedural legislation of Ukraine.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

ZAYTSEVA, L. V., and N. V. SUKHOVA. "ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: PROCEDURAL PROOF ISSUES." Herald of Civil Procedure 9, no. 1 (March 18, 2019): 189–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-1-189-204.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kozhevnikova, A. V. "ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS OF UKRAINE." Comparative-analytical law, no. 6 (2019): 128–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/2524-0390/2019.6.30.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

GROYSBERG, А. I. "ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE SYSTEM OF CIVIL LAW PROCEEDINGS." Herald of Civil Procedure 9, no. 2 (May 1, 2019): 55–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-2-55-75.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kalashnyk, Olena, and Daryna Sagan. "Use of electronic evidence by refugees in civil procedure." Scientific and informational bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk University of Law named after King Danylo Halytskyi, no. 12(24) (December 9, 2021): 133–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2021.12.24.133-139.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze the current legislation that regulates the submission of refugees to court and the study of electronic evidence by courts in civil proceedings, outline the existing problems of using electronic evidence in court proceedings and analysis of court practice of electronic evidence. Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of existing scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions. During the research the methods of scientific cognition were used: comparative-legal, logical-semantic, functional, logical-normative. Results. The study found that the use of electronic evidence, on the one hand, has simplified the proof procedure for refugees, but on the other hand, problems remain. Scientific novelty. In the course of the research it was established that for the full use of electronic evidence in Ukraine it is expedient to refine the information and telecommunication systems of courts, to provide courts with appropriate material and technical base, which would allow unhindered research of electronic evidence. Practical significance. The significance of the study is determined by the fact that the scientific results provide a basis for improving the legislation on the use of electronic evidence by refugees in Ukraine.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Zhetibaev, Zh K. "Features of electronic evidences in civil proceedings." Law and State, no. 3-4 (2020): 118–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.51634/2307-5201_2020_34_118.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Dyachenko, S. V., and S. V. Dyachenko. "ELECTRONIC MEANS OF PROOF IN CIVIL PROCESS." Constitutional State, no. 42 (July 7, 2021): 145–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.18524/2411-2054.2021.42.232417.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of the article is to explore the issues of electronic means of proof in the civil process of Ukraine and foreign countries, the problems of application, as well as to identify possible ways to improve them. Relevance of research is due to that the issue of electronic evidence is gaining new importance at the present stage during the rapid development and improvement of electronic means of communication and media which causes the emergence of new theoretical and practical problems in their application. In this regard, a comparative analysis of the legislative consolidation and practice of application of this topic in civil proceedings of foreign countries and Ukraine will provide an opportunity to identify further ways to modernize electronic evidence in general. Also, the problematic issues concerning their application during the trial have not been fully resolved and the peculiarities of other countries have not been singled out. Therefore, effective use of the achievements of scientific and technological progress has become an important issue in the judiciary due to the continuous computerization and informatization. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions and proposals. The following general scientific methods of cognition were used during the research: dialectical, terminological, logical-semantic, system-structural, logical-normative, comparative. The issues of legislative regulation of electronic evidence in Ukraine and other countries, their key differences, as well as the author’s ways to improve electronic evidence by borrowing best practices from other countries, including the United States. Problematic aspects of legislative consolidation of electronic evidence have been identified, the possibility of introducing forensic methods into the civil process to establish the authenticity of the provided electronic evidence and application of the blockchain system in order to prevent their destruction has been assessed. The current legal positions from judicial practice were given and analyzed on the issues under consideration. The results of the study can be used in lawmaking and law enforcement activities for the use of electronic evidence in civil proceedings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Electronic evidence in civil proceedings"

1

Singh, Nerisha. "Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings." Doctoral thesis, Faculty of Law, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32978.

Full text
Abstract:
The research question central to the thesis is stated as follows: what are the implications of new technological phenomena in South African law to the existing legal frameworks in relation to (i) investigatory powers of law enforcement and security and intelligence agencies to obtain electronic evidence, and (ii) its subsequent admissibility in criminal proceedings? Written with an emphasis on South African law, but also taking into account aspects of foreign and international law, the thesis seeks to investigate how our existing legal frameworks which regulate the use of and access to electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, including its admissibility, integrate and adapt to challenges raised by new and rapidly changing technological developments. The thesis provides a critical analysis of the existing legal framework regulating certain key investigative powers of law enforcement and security and intelligence agencies in the current modern environment of the information age in which they operate. Key among them is the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act 70 of 2002. New technology has not only increased opportunities for criminal activity, it has also created opportunities for law enforcement and security and intelligence agencies to have access to more sophisticated and new capabilities. The range of intrusive capabilities now available to law enforcement and security and intelligence agencies triggers a range of issues and challenges for individual rights, including how those capabilities are used in investigation activities, the scale of their use, the extent to which such capabilities intrude on privacy rights, legislative authority for their use and safeguards that constrain and regulate such new technological capabilities. The challenges of regulating investigative powers in an era of new and fastpaced technological developments is explored in relation to (i) interception of communications (ii) acquisition and retention of communications data, and (iii) access to encrypted information. The introduction of electronic evidence in criminal legal proceedings raises unique challenges in the South African law on evidence. The most interesting perhaps is the extent to which the nature of the evidence presented, in this instance electronic evidence, impacts on admissibility in criminal proceedings. Potential anomalies arise as the relevant legislation, the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002, is based on an electronic commerce model law concerned with commercial activities. In this regard, two separate issues are the focus of research interest. The thesis offers a rethinking of (a) admissibility of electronic evidence and (b) its weight. The meaning and application of certain statutory provisions, insofar as it applies to electronic evidence as hearsay or real evidence, or both, are key and controversial issues. Another relates to the business records exceptions, which directly translated for electronic records appears to have created a problematic presumption. On matters of evidential weight, there is no ‘one-size-fits-all' approach that will work. While a robust consideration of authentication is required in the court's assessment of evidential weight of electronic evidence, it should not be subject to inflexible tests that make it difficult for authentic electronic evidence to be admitted into evidence. A central premise of the thesis is that evolving technological phenomena can and do present challenges to existing legal concepts on evidence and the investigatory powers of law enforcement and the security and intelligence agencies to obtain electronic evidence and for its admissibility in criminal proceedings. This is done in the context of understanding whether South African law has developed appropriately in response to advancements in technology. In the final analysis, the thesis considers appropriate and meaningful reform towards a modern and transparent legal framework in South African law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Van, Tonder Gert Petrus. "The admissibility and evidential weight of electronic evidence in South African legal proceedings: a comparative perspective." University of the Western Cape, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/4833.

Full text
Abstract:
Magister Legum - LLM
This research will analyse legislation, case law, law commission papers and reports, as well as academic commentary on electronic evidence in South Africa, Canada and England. A comparative analysis will be conducted in order to determine whether South Africa is adequately regulating electronic evidence in light of international and foreign law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ng, Yu-wai Magnum. "A comparative study of the law and practice on taking of evidence in international arbitration proceedings an eclectic approach of common law and civil law systems /." access abstract and table of contents access full-text, 2008. http://libweb.cityu.edu.hk/cgi-bin/ezdb/dissert.pl?ma-slw-b22730126a.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (M.A.)--City University of Hong Kong, 2008.
Title from PDF t.p. (viewed on Oct. 3, 2008) "City University of Hong Kong, School of Law, LW 6409A Dissertation." Includes bibliographical references (p. 63-65)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gaqa, Thando. "The rule in Hollington v Hewthorn in the light of section 17 Of The Civil Proceedings Evidence Act 25 of 1965 in South Africa." University of the Western Cape, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/6830.

Full text
Abstract:
Magister Legum - LLM
South Africa, among others, has adopted, and is bound by, the so-called 'rule in Hollington‘ that originated in England in 1943 in Hollington v Hewthorn (hereinafter the 'Hollington case‘). The issue, among others, that the English Appeal Court had to determine in this case was whether a judgement of a criminal court could be used in subsequent civil proceedings to prove the liability of either of the litigants. The Court reached the conclusion that a judgement of a criminal court is just an irrelevant and inadmissible opinion in later civil proceedings. The court adopted the view that had a criminal conviction been admissible evidence in civil proceedings, it would lead to a situation where the defendant would end up challenging the propriety of those convictions. In the light of that, the courts would be faced with a duty to retry the criminal case in the midst of the civil proceedings. Section 17 of the Civil Proceedings Evidence Act (CPEA) provides that a conviction or an acquittal can be proved by the production of a document dully certified by the relevant court that acquitted or convicted the person in question. Furthermore, section 18 of the Supreme Court Act (SuCA) now section 34 of the Superior Courts Act (SupCA) provides that whenever a judgement, among other things, of a court needs to be proved or referred to in any manner a duly certified copy thereof will serve as prima facie evidence thereof. These sections militate against the rule in Hollington in that they allow, or at least should be interpreted in a manner that accords with the allowance of, the admissibility of conviction evidence in later civil law suits.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Carvalho, João Victor Carloni de. "A tutela da evidência no sistema processual civil brasileiro /." Franca, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/191631.

Full text
Abstract:
Orientador: Yvete Flávio da Costa
Resumo: A presente pesquisa tem a finalidade de analisar a Tutela da Evidência frente ao novo ordenamento processual civil. Tal instituto faz parte das Tutelas Provisórias, aquelas analisadas a partir de um juízo sumário a fim de se conceder maior eficiência ao processo durante o seu curso. Num primeiro momento necessário um estudo sobre o panorama geral das tutelas provisórias, dando um enfoque na de urgência, a qual demanda a presença dos requisitos da probabilidade do direito e do perigo de dano ou risco ao resultado útil do processo, de forma cumulativa. Feita essa abordagem, concentrar-se-á o estudo nos casos explícitos de tutela da evidência, presentes no rol do art. 311 do Código Processual Civil, estabelecendo-se, ainda, as premissas para a suas diferenças em relação à tutela de urgência, principalmente no tocante à ausência de demonstração do periculum in mora. Por fim, um estudo acerca de hipóteses de tutela evidente fora do rol do art. 311, e até mesmo do CPC/2015 necessita ser feito, pois a legislação processual preconiza algumas situações “especiais” de evidência, em que se concede tutelas, e até mesmo liminares, somente com o fumus boni iuris. Busca-se, portanto, um entendimento sobre o que é um direito evidente e como as novas ferramentas processuais podem contribuir para maior eficiência e celeridade processuais, garantindo-se um mais efetivo acesso à ordem jurídica justa.
Mestre
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Melo, Danilo Gomes de. "Tutela de evidência: um estudo sobre a aplicação do artigo 311 do código de processo civil de 2015." Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, 2017. http://www.unicap.br/tede//tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1274.

Full text
Abstract:
Conforme exposição de motivos do Código de Processo Civil de 2015, um dos fundamentos para sua elaboração foi a de proporcionar maior celeridade e efetividade ao processo. Para concretizar o objetivo almejado, foi adotado o termo tutela de evidência no artigo 311, ampliando as hipóteses de antecipação dos efeitos da tutela jurisdicional, sem, contudo, necessidade de comprovação da urgência. Portanto, o CPC/2015 apresenta um novo arcabouço para as tutelas provisórias, sendo imprescindível seu estudo pelos operadores do direito. Entretanto, a mudança legislativa não possui embasamento estatístico que a justifique. Assim, o presente trabalho tem como pretensão apresentar as premissas teóricas que fundamentaram a criação da tutela de evidência, enfrentando os temas relacionados com ênfase em análise empírica de processos judiciais, verificando se existe separação entre os conceitos encampados pela doutrina e pela prática jurídica.
According to the exposition of motives from the Civil Process Code of 2015, one of the fundamentals to its elaboration was to provide celerity and effectiveness to the process. To achieve the intended goal, it was adopted the evidence injunction on article 311, expanding the anticipation hypothesis of the judicial protection effects, without, however, need to prove the urgency. Therefore, the CPC/2015 presents a new framework to the provisory judicial protection, being indispensable its study by the operators of law. However, the legislative change does not possess statistical basement that justifies itself. Thereby, the present work has the pretension to present the theoretical premises that grounded the evidence injunction creation, facing the themes related to emphasis in empirical analysis of judicial processes, checking if there is separation between the concepts emplaced by the doctrine and by the juridical practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Strenger, Guilherme. "A efetividade processual e sua celeridade sob o enfoque dos atos processuais no processo eletrônico." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2014. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6648.

Full text
Abstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:23:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Guilherme Strenger.pdf: 531300 bytes, checksum: 77944ef63f946f6a29c8b75f978853a0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-11-07
This study aims to analyze the principle of reasonable duration of the proceedings towards the so-called effectiveness in contemporary civil procedure. In this sense, the analysis of constitutional principles will support a better understanding of the modern scientism procedure, guided by the obedience to Constitution. Thus, reflections turn over on what represents an expeditious and effective process, so focusing on the reasonable length without sacrificing legal certainty. Also, it is included in the study the Electronic process of law and its sue activities. Thereat, the goal is to evaluate in what ways or points the Electronic process of law and electronic activities in process of law may contribute for the principle of reasonable duration of the proceedings in sue activities. Moreover, it is presented some observations about this up-to-date phenomenon; and finally it is concluded that an expeditious and effective process does not necessarily means that the process of law shall be electronically managed
Este estudo tem como finalidade a análise do princípio da razoável duração do processo frente ao que se objetiva denominar efetividade no processo civil contemporâneo. A análise de princípios constitucionais dará suporte para melhor compreensão do cientificismo processual moderno pautado pela obediência à Constituição. Desta forma, a reflexão gira em torno do que representa um processo célere e efetivo de modo a privilegiar a razoável duração sem que se ofenda a segurança jurídica. Neste sentido, analisa-se, ainda e especialmente, o processo eletrônico e seus atos processuais. Com isso, pretende-se discutir até que ponto a introdução do processo eletrônico em nosso sistema e a prática de atos processuais de maneira eletrônica pode efetivar a aplicação do princípio constitucional da razoável duração do processo. Nessa toada tem-se a apresentação de críticas e visões sobre essa nova realidade para se concluir que um processo mais célere não necessariamente representa um processo conduzido de maneira eletrônica
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Jaume, Bennasar Andrés. "Las nuevas tecnologías en la administración de justicia. La validez y eficacia del documento electrónico en sede procesal." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de les Illes Balears, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/9415.

Full text
Abstract:
La tesis se encarga de analizar, por un lado, la integración y el desarrollo de las nuevas tecnologías en la Administración de Justicia; y, por otro, los parámetros que constituyen la validez y eficacia del documento electrónico.
La primera cuestión se centra en la configuración de los Sistemas de Información de la Oficina Judicial y del Ministerio Fiscal, así como de la informatización de los Registros Civiles, donde el art. 230 LOPJ es la pieza clave. Se estudian sus programas, aplicaciones, la videoconferencia, los ficheros judiciales y las redes de telecomunicaciones que poseen la cobertura de la firma electrónica reconocida, donde cobran gran relevancia los convenios de colaboración tecnológica. La digitalización de las vistas quizá sea una de las cuestiones con más trascendencia, teniendo en cuenta que el juicio es el acto que culmina el proceso. Aunque no todos los proyectos adoptados en el ámbito de la e.justicia se han desarrollado de forma integral, ni han llegado a la totalidad de los órganos judiciales. El objetivo final es lograr una Justicia más ágil y de calidad, a lo cual aspira el Plan Estratégico de Modernización de la Justicia 2009-2012 aprobado recientemente.
En referencia a la segunda perspectiva, no cabe duda que el Ordenamiento jurídico y los tribunales, en el ámbito de la justicia material, otorgan plena validez y eficacia al documento electrónico. Nuestra línea de investigación se justifica porque cada vez son más los procesos que incorporan soportes electrónicos de todo tipo, ya sea al plantearse la acción o posteriormente como medio de prueba (art. 299.2 LEC). Entre otros temas examinamos el documento informático, la problemática que rodea al fax, los sistemas de videograbación y el contrato electrónico.
La tesi s'encarrega d'analitzar, per una part, la integració i el desenvolupament de les noves tecnologies dins l´Administració de Justícia; i, per l'altra, els paràmetres que constitueixen la validesa i l'eficàcia del document electrònic.
La primera qüestió es centra en la configuració dels Sistemes d´Informació de l´Oficina Judicial i del Ministeri Fiscal, així com de la informatització dels Registres Civils, on l'art. 230 LOPJ es la peça clau. S'estudien els seus programes, aplicacions, la videoconferència, el fitxers judicials i les xarxes de telecomunicacions que tenen la cobertura de la firma electrònica reconeguda, on cobren gran rellevància els convenis de col·laboració tecnològica. La digitalització de les vistes tal vegada sigui una de les qüestions amb més transcendència, tenint amb compte que el judici es l'acte que culmina el procés. Però no tots el projectes adoptats en l'àmbit de la e.justicia s'han desenvolupat d'una manera integral ni han arribat a la totalitat dels òrgans judicials. L'objectiu final es assolir una Justícia més àgil i de qualitat, al que aspira el Pla Estratègic de Modernització de la Justícia 2009-2012 aprovat recentment.
En referència a la segona perspectiva, no hi ha dubte que l´Ordenament jurídic i els tribunals, en l'àmbit de la justícia material, donen plena validesa i eficàcia al document electrònic. La nostra línia d'investigació es justifica perquè cada vegada son més el processos que incorporen suports electrònics de tot tipus, ja sigui quant es planteja l'acció o posteriorment como a medi de prova (art. 299.2 LEC). Entre altres temes examinem el document informàtic, la problemàtica que envolta al fax, els sistemes de videogravació i el contracte electrònic.
The thesis seeks to analyse, on the one hand, the integration and development of the new technologies in the Administration of Justice; and, on the other, the parameters which constitute the validity and efficiency of the electronic document.
The first question centres on the configuration of the Information Systems of the Judicial Office and the Public Prosecutor, as well as the computerisation of the Civil Registers, where the art. 230 LOPJ it's the part key. Their programmes, applications, the Video Conferencing, the judicial registers and the telecommunication networks which are covered by the recognised electronic signatures, are studied, where the agreements on technological collaboration gain great relevance. The digitalisation of evidence might perhaps be one of the questions with most consequence, bearing in mind that the judgment is the act by which the process is culminated. Although not all the projects adopted within the compass of e.justice have developed completely nor have reached all the judicial organs. The final objective is to achieve an agile, quality Justice, to which the recently approved Strategic Plan for the Modernisation of Justice aspires.
With reference to the second perspective, there is no doubt that the juridical Ordinance and the tribunals within the compass of material justice grant full validity and efficacy to the electronic document. Our line of investigation is justified because there are more and more processes which are sustained by electronic supports of all kinds, whether it be at the establishment of the action or later, as a proof of it (art. 299.2 LEC). Amongst other things, we examine the computerised document, the problems which surround the fax, the systems for video recording and the electronic contract.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Amaro, Rafael. "Le contentieux privé des pratiques anticoncurrentielles : Étude des contentieux privés autonome et complémentaire devant les juridictions judiciaires." Thesis, Paris 5, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA05D014.

Full text
Abstract:
L’actualisation des données sur le contentieux privé des pratiques anticoncurrentielles fait naître laconviction que l’état de sous-développement souvent pointé est aujourd’hui dépassé. Les statistiquessont nettes : des dizaines d’affaires sont plaidées chaque année. Toutefois, ce contentieux s’esquissesous des traits qui ne sont pas exactement ceux du contentieux indemnitaire de masse faisant suite àla commission d’ententes internationales. C’est un fait majeur qui doit être noté car l’essentiel desprojets de réforme furent bâtis sur cet idéal type. Trois des caractères les plus saillants de la réalitéjudiciaire témoignent de cette fracture entre droit positif et droit prospectif. D’abord, le contentieuxprivé est majoritairement un contentieux contractuel entre professionnels aux forces déséquilibrées. Ensuite, c’estun contentieux national – voire local – plus qu’un contentieux international. Enfin, c’est plutôt uncontentieux autonome se déployant devant les juridictions judiciaires sans procédure préalable oupostérieure des autorités de concurrence (stand alone). Paradoxalement, les actions complémentaires(follow-on), pourtant réputées d’une mise en oeuvre aisée, sont plus rares. Ces observations invitentalors à réviser l’ordre des priorités de toute réflexion prospective. Ainsi, la lutte contre l’asymétried’informations et de moyens entre litigants, l’essor de sanctions contractuelles efficaces, larecomposition du rôle des autorités juridictionnelles et administratives dans le procès civil ou encorele développement des procédures de référé s’imposent avec urgence. Mais s’il paraît légitime desoutenir ce contentieux autonome déjà existant, il n’en reste pas moins utile de participer à laréflexion déjà amorcée pour développer le contentieux indemnitaire de masse tant attendu et dont onne peut négliger les atouts. De lege ferenda, le contentieux privé de demain présenterait donc uncaractère bicéphale ; il serait à la fois autonome et complémentaire. Il faut alors tenter de concevoir unrégime efficace pour ces deux moutures du contentieux privé en tenant compte de leurs exigencesrespectives. Or l’analyse positive et prospective de leurs fonctions révèlent que contentieuxautonome et contentieux complémentaire s’illustrent autant par les fonctions qu’ils partagent que parcelles qui les distinguent. Il serait donc excessif de vouloir en tous points leur faire application derègles particulières ou, à l’inverse, de règles identiques. C’est donc vers l’élaboration d’un régime commun complété par un régime particulier à chacun d’eux que s’orientera la présente recherche.PREMIÈRE PARTIE. Le régime commun aux contentieux privés autonome et complémentaireSECONDE PARTIE. Le régime particulier à chacun des contentieux privés autonome et complémentaire
Pas de résumé en anglais
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Klimtová, Alena. "Dokazování v civilním procesu." Master's thesis, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-297823.

Full text
Abstract:
Résumé I chose the topic of evidence in civil legal proceedings as I regard the matter not only as very interesting, but also as very significant from the viewpoint of further specialist work. The production of evidence in civil procedural law includes not only activities by the parties when exercising their subjective rights, but also activities by a court, whose task is to ensure just protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the parties. As evidence in civil legal proceedings is a markedly wide-ranging issue, in this work I have limited myself to an explanation of the basic institutions of evidence in civil legal proceedings and have paid more attention to current questions concerning selected means of evidence, the question of imposing the duty to pay an advance on the costs of evidence in the form of an expert report and the question of the production of evidence through questioning of a minor. In chapter one I attempted an analysis of the term evidence and a specification of the subject of evidence from the viewpoint of its positive and negative definition, i.e., in brief what is and what is not the subject of evidence. I also briefly mentioned the issue of community law in connection with the Czech Republic's membership of the European Union. In this chapter it was also necessary to...
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Electronic evidence in civil proceedings"

1

Gruber, Jordan S. Electronic evidence. [Rochester, N.Y.]: Lawyers Cooperative Pub., 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Law Reform Advisory Committee for Northern Ireland. Hearsay evidence in civil proceedings. Belfast: H.M.S.O., 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Commission, Great Britain Law. The hearsay rule in civil proceedings. London: HMSO, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Great Britain. Lord Chancellor's Dept., ed. The hearsay rule in civil proceedings. London: HMSO, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kong, Law Reform Commission of Hong. Report on hearsay rule in civil proceedings (topic 3). [Hong Kong]: Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ibrahim, Hamid. Civil proceedings: Burden & standard of proof. Subang Indah, Petaling Jaya, Selangor: Gavel Publications, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cockerill, Sara. The law and practice of compelled evidence in civil proceedings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Evidence: Report on corroboration, hearsay and related matters in civil proceedings. Edinburgh: H.M.S.O., 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Mata, Federico Bueno de. Prueba electrónica y proceso 2.0: Especial referencia al proceso civil. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kaczmarek-Templin, Berenika. Dowód z dokumentu elektronicznego w procesie cywilnym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Electronic evidence in civil proceedings"

1

Emson, Raymond. "Hearsay in civil proceedings." In Evidence, 423–27. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36358-8_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Emson, Raymond. "Hearsay in Civil Proceedings." In Evidence, 219–22. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14994-0_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

de Resende Chaves Júnior, José Eduardo. "Proceedings on the Web." In Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure, 101–24. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kodek, Georg E. "Modern Communications and Information Technology and the Taking of Evidence." In Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure, 261–78. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Zhang, Baosheng, and Huangxun Chen. "Applications and Trends of Digital/Electronic Evidence in Chinese Litigation." In Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure, 305–23. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kulski, Robert. "Remarks on the Polish Electronic Proceedings by Writ of Payment." In Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure, 211–19. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ambrus, Zoltán. "Applied Technology in Litigation Proceedings (The Electronic Discovery Reference Model)." In Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure, 285–93. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Marcus, Richard L. "The Impact of Digital Information on American Evidence-Gathering and Trial – The Straw That Breaks the Camel’s Back?" In Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure, 29–48. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bussière, Dave. "Evidence and Implications of Electronic Word of Mouth." In Proceedings of the 2000 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, 361. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11885-7_89.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Settem, Ola Johan. "The ‘Evidence’ Issue." In Applications of the 'Fair Hearing' Norm in ECHR Article 6(1) to Civil Proceedings, 337–93. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24883-7_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Electronic evidence in civil proceedings"

1

Koshelev, Anton, and Ekaterina Rusakova. "ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN INDIA." In NORDSCI International Conference. SAIMA Consult Ltd, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32008/nordsci2020/b2/v3/10.

Full text
Abstract:
A significant leap in the development of information technology over the past twenty years has made the global legal community respond to new challenges that have come along with the progress in the digital environment. Together with the convenience of using electronic resources, society has developed a need for a simple and understandable legislative regulation of legal relations arising from the use of computer information technologies and various products of electronic digital activity in order to protect their interests potentially. The concept and types of electronic evidence in civil proceedings in different countries have different meanings. Meanwhile, the regulations of their procedural admissibility and applicability differ. The common thing is the tendency towards an increase in the use of electronic information carriers in court proceedings, increasing importance for establishing specific facts, and the decisive evidentiary role in making decisions by the court. India became one of the first countries to realize the growing level of implementation of Internet technologies, electronic digital storage media, and computer dominance in society and the state's daily life [1] (Artemyeva, Y.A. et al.). The consequence of this understanding was the timely development and implementation of the substantive and procedural bases in evidence law for practical, understandable, and convenient use of electronic evidence in civil proceedings. The article examines the types and procedural status of electronic evidence and analyzes the current legislation and law enforcement practice in the admissibility and application of electronic evidence in civil proceedings in India. The study identifies the existing system of electronic evidence in the legal field of India, the determination of the advantages and disadvantages in the gathering, presentation, research, and evaluation of electronic evidence by the court in civil proceedings, as well as the identification of the procedural order for their provision. The researchers have identified the following tasks to achieve the goals: • to define and research the legislation of India governing the concept, types and procedural order of applicability and admissibility of electronic evidence in civil proceedings in India; • to develop a particular procedural order for the effective use of the institution of electronic evidence in civil litigation in India; • to identify the current trends in the gathering, presentation, research, and evaluation of electronic evidence in India's courts, based on the established judicial practice study. The research methodology is based on general theoretical and scientific methods of cognition, including abstraction and specification, analysis and synthesis, modeling and comparison, and systemic, logical, and functional analyzes. The scientific novelty of the research consists of a comprehensive study of the instruments of legal regulation of the institution of electronic evidence in India's legal field, including regulatory legal acts and judicial precedents, and a consideration of the possibility of applying Indian approaches in the jurisdictions of other countries. The analysis of legislation and jurisprudence regarding electronic evidence in India's civil proceedings was carried out using the synergistic principle of object study, statistical-sequential analysis, and empirical research method. This study's results can be used in lawmaking to develop and improve regulations regarding the procedural status and use of electronic evidence in civil litigation in any country. The reference, citation, and use of this article's conclusions and materials are permissible when conducting lectures and seminars on civil procedure and private international law, research activities, law enforcement practice, and teaching.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

S., Sepriyadi Adhan, Ati Yuniati, and Muhammad Labib Muhadz. "Electronic Certificate Perspective in Civil Law Evidence." In Universitas Lampung International Conference on Social Sciences (ULICoSS 2021). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220102.043.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kuleshova, I. A. "Problems of falsifying evidence in civil and arbitration proceedings." In ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ НАУКИ И ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ. НИЦ «Л-Журнал», 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/lj-04-2018-59.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Minyaylenko, Nikolai Nikolaevich, and Aleksandr Yurievich Keklis. "Evidence in Civil Proceedings (Modern Theoretical and Legal View)." In АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ РАЗВИТИЯ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОСТИ И ПУБЛИЧНОГО ПРАВА. Санкт-Петербург: Санкт-Петербургский институт (филиал) ВГУЮ (РПА Минюста России), 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.47645/978-5-6044512-3-6_2020_1_153.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Blahuta, Roman, Anatolii Movchan, and Maksym Movchan. "Use of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in Ukraine." In International Conference on Social Science, Psychology and Legal Regulation (SPL 2021). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211218.032.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zhang, Qi. "Study on Rule of Exclusion of Electronic Evidence." In Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Education, Management, Arts, Economics and Social Science (ICEMAESS 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icemaess-18.2018.169.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Liu, Zonghui, Yetian Wang, Hui Ke, Heng Wu, and Dong Zhou. "Research on multisource information fusion of tunnel geological prediction based on evidence theory." In Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Environmental Engineering (ICCAE2016). CRC Press/Balkema P.O. Box 11320, 2301 EH Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press/Balkema, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315116259-13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

"PROSPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS." In Russian science: actual researches and developments. Samara State University of Economics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46554/russian.science-2020.03-2-583/585.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Holden, S. H., D. F. Norris, and P. D. Fletcher. "Electronic government at the grass roots: contemporary evidence and future trends." In 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the. IEEE, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2003.1174305.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sagala, Juben, and Faisal Santiago. "Evidence in Civil Action Procedures against the Law by Controlling and Owning Land without Legal Rights." In Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference, MIC 2021, October 30 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia. EAI, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315849.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Electronic evidence in civil proceedings' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography