Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Emil Kraepelin / Books

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Emil Kraepelin.

Books on the topic 'Emil Kraepelin'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 26 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 18 books for your research on the topic 'Emil Kraepelin.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Hoff, Paul. Emil Kraepelin und die Psychiatrie als klinische Wissenschaft. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85079-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

von Hirsch, Antonia. Emil Kraepelin und die Krankheit von James Loeb. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27642-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Hoff, Paul. Emil Kraepelin und die Psychiatrie als klinische Wissenschaft: Ein Beitrag zum Selbstverständnis psychiatrischer Forschung. Springer-Verlag, 1994.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

ed, Bick Katherine L., Amaducci Luigi ed, Pepeu Giancarlo ed, et al., eds. The Early story of Alzheimer's disease: Translation of the historical papers by Alois Alzheimer, Oskar Fischer, Francesco Bonfiglio, Emil Kraepelin, Gaetano Perusini. Liviana Press, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Shorter, Edward, and Max Fink. Emil Kraepelin. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190881191.003.0004.

Full text

Abstract:

Emil Kraepelin, professor of psychiatry first in Heidelberg then Munich, originated modern psychiatric diagnosis. So it was a fateful error when, in 1899, Kraepelin made catatonia a “subtype” of schizophrenia (which Kraepelin called “dementia praecox”). He did so on the basis of what Kraepelin considered a downhill course and outcome. Catatonia thus disappeared into the schizophrenia tent and ceased to be an independent disease entity. There it remained for the next century. It was because of Kraepelin’s immense prestige that his disease classification has survived virtually until the present.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Kraepelin, Emil. Cien años de psiquiatría [Paperback] [Jan 01, 1999] Emil Kraepelin. ASOC. ESP. NEUROPSIQUIATRIA, 1999.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Steinberg, Holger. Der Briefwechsel Wilhelm Wundt & Emil Kraepelin. Zeugnis einer jahrzehntelangen Freundschaft. Huber, Bern, 2002.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Hoff, Paul. Emil Kraepelin und Die Psychiatrie Als Klinische Wissenschaft: Ein Beitrag Zum Selbstverständnis Psychiatrischer Forschung. Springer London, Limited, 2013.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Hoff, Paul. Emil Kraepelin und Die Psychiatrie Als Klinische Wissenschaft: Ein Beitrag Zum Selbstverständnis Psychiatrischer Forschung. Springer, 2012.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Kendler, Kenneth S. Introduction to “On attitudes toward philosophy and psychology in German psychiatry, 1867–1917”. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198725978.003.0016.

Full text

Abstract:

Chapter 16 is an introduction to Chapter 17, which covers attitudes toward philosophy and psychology in German psychiatry between 1867–1917, including discussion related to Wilhelm Wundt, Emil Kraepelin, Theodore Ziehen, interdisciplinary history, philosophy, psychiatry, and experimental psychology.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Hirsch, Antonia von. Emil Kraepelin und die Krankheit von James Loeb: Die Behandlung einer bipolaren Störung im Jahr 1917. Springer, 2019.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Sato, Yuji. Interdisciplinarity versus compartmentalization: an eternal dilemma in psychiatry. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198725978.003.0018.

Full text

Abstract:

Chapter 18 is a commentary on Chapter 17, which covers attitudes toward philosophy and psychology in German psychiatry between 1867–1917, including discussion related to Wilhelm Wundt, Emil Kraepelin, Theodore Ziehen, interdisciplinary history, philosophy, psychiatry, and experimental psychology, and how interdisciplinarity versus compartmentalization is an ongoing dilemma in psychiatry.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Engstrom, Eric J. On attitudes toward philosophy and psychology in German psychiatry, 1867–1917. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198725978.003.0017.

Full text

Abstract:

Chapter 17 examines the disciplinary threshold between psychiatry, philosophy, and psychology in late nineteenth-century Germany. It begins with a brief sketch of the post-Hegelian crisis before drawing on the work of several protagonists (Wilhelm Wundt, Emil Kraepelin, and Theodor Ziehen) to explore how that crisis influenced psychiatry, and then how they interpreted the relationship between psychiatry and philosophy, discussing some of the exchanges that transpired across the disciplinary threshold, and illustrating how these exchanges shaped the development of psychiatry. Specifically, it a

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Hoff, Paul. On reification of mental illness: Historical and conceptual issues from Emil Kraepelin and Eugen Bleuler to DSM-5. Edited by Kenneth S. Kendler and Josef Parnas. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198796022.003.0014.

Full text

Abstract:

Reification is the assumption that mental illnesses exist independent of the observer’s conceptualization. The present debate usually addresses naturalistic reification, i.e., the definition of mental illness as an empirically detectable neurobiological dysfunction. This chapter discusses Kraepelin’s and Bleuler’s views on nosology and the position of current operationalized diagnoses (DSM-5, ICD-10), delineating recent debate on the relevance of new research technologies.There are two main conclusions: (1) “Mental illness” always refers to a concept, not to a given thing. This does not reduce

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

München, Universität, ed. Zum Konzept der Schizophrenie bei Emil Kraepelin: Ein Beitrag zu Entstehungsbedingungen, Entwicklung und Auswirkungen der Kraepelinschen Dementia praecox. 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Parnas, Josef. Introduction to “On reification of mental illness: Historical and conceptual issues from Emil Kraepelin and Eugen Bleuler to DSM-5”. Edited by Kenneth S. Kendler and Josef Parnas. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198796022.003.0013.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter presents an introduction to the fundamental issue in nosology of reification of mental illness. It briefly outlines the arguments of the following chapter, including the ontological status of mental and social phenomena, as well as operational criteria and operationalism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Meyer, Emma, Julie Walsh-Messinger, and Dolores Malaspina. Diagnosis and Epidemiology of Psychotic Disorders. Edited by Dennis S. Charney, Eric J. Nestler, Pamela Sklar, and Joseph D. Buxbaum. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190681425.003.0012.

Full text

Abstract:

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders and affective psychoses are jointly considered in this chapter in light of the ongoing controversy concerning the diagnostic boundary between these conditions. Emil Kraepelin first separated schizophrenia (which he named dementia praecox) from manic-depressive insanity based on the deteriorating course of illness in schizophrenia, and the convention is still upheld in the DSM-5. A wealth of evidence suggests that this dichotomy does not mirror clinical reality. This chapter reviews the history of the diagnostic concepts underlying the grouping and separation of

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Marcsisin, Michael J., and Jessica M. Gannon. History and Phenomenology of Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199331505.003.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

Psychosis has probably affected humans since the start of humanity itself, although the construct of schizophrenia is a relatively new phenomenon, dating back to the nineteenth century. Work by Emil Kraepelin and Eugen Bleuler helped consolidate ideas about psychotic disorders, setting the stage for both clinical care and neuroscience research in subsequent centuries. Phenomenologically, psychotic symptoms range from “positive” symptoms (delusions, hallucinations), to “negative” symptoms (avolition, affective blunting), to “disorganization” symptoms (disorganized speech and behavior), which al

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!