Academic literature on the topic 'Emission reduction, poultry farming'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Emission reduction, poultry farming.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Emission reduction, poultry farming"
Jarosz, Zuzanna, and Antoni Faber. "AMMONIA EMISSION FROM ANIMAL PRODUCTION IN POLAND ON A REGIONAL SCALE." Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists XXI, no. 2 (June 3, 2019): 117–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2071.
Full textCui, Yuanlong, Elmer Theo, Tugba Gurler, Yuehong Su, and Riffat Saffa. "A comprehensive review on renewable and sustainable heating systems for poultry farming." International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 15, no. 1 (November 20, 2019): 121–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctz048.
Full textde Vries, Wim, Hans Kros, and Oene Oenema. "Modeled Impacts of Farming Practices and Structural Agricultural Changes on Nitrogen Fluxes in the Netherlands." Scientific World JOURNAL 1 (2001): 664–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.332.
Full textTang, Yuk S., Christine F. Braban, Ulrike Dragosits, Anthony J. Dore, Ivan Simmons, Netty van Dijk, Janet Poskitt, et al. "Drivers for spatial, temporal and long-term trends in atmospheric ammonia and ammonium in the UK." Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18, no. 2 (January 22, 2018): 705–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-705-2018.
Full textDalgaard, T., J. F. Bienkowski, A. Bleeker, J. L. Drouet, P. Durand, U. Dragosits, A. Frumau, et al. "Farm nitrogen balances in six European agricultural landscapes – a method for farming system assessment, emission hotspot identification, and mitigation measure evaluation." Biogeosciences Discussions 9, no. 7 (July 21, 2012): 8859–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bgd-9-8859-2012.
Full textSutton, M. A., U. Dragosits, S. Hellsten, C. J. Place, A. J. Dore, Y. S. Tang, N. van Dijk, et al. "Ammonia Emission and Deposition in Scotland and Its Potential Environmental Impacts." Scientific World JOURNAL 4 (2004): 795–810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2004.130.
Full textDalgaard, T., J. F. Bienkowski, A. Bleeker, U. Dragosits, J. L. Drouet, P. Durand, A. Frumau, et al. "Farm nitrogen balances in six European landscapes as an indicator for nitrogen losses and basis for improved management." Biogeosciences 9, no. 12 (December 20, 2012): 5303–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5303-2012.
Full textEstrada-González, Iván E., Paul Adolfo Taboada-González, Hilda Guerrero-García-Rojas, and Liliana Márquez-Benavides. "Decreasing the Environmental Impact in an Egg-Producing Farm through the Application of LCA and Lean Tools." Applied Sciences 10, no. 4 (February 17, 2020): 1352. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app10041352.
Full textKucheruk, M., and M. Galaburda. "Potential risk in the organic poultry production and its prevention." Naukovij vìsnik veterinarnoï medicini, no. 2(160) (November 24, 2020): 28–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.33245/2310-4902-2020-160-2-28-38.
Full textChalova, Vesela I., Jihyuk Kim, Paul H. Patterson, Steven C. Ricke, and Woo K. Kim. "Reduction of nitrogen excretion and emission in poultry: A review for organic poultry." Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 51, no. 4 (January 19, 2016): 230–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2015.1120616.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Emission reduction, poultry farming"
Lippmann, Jens. "Emissionen aus Haltungssystemen für Legehennen." Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden, 2014. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-152917.
Full textLippmann, Jens. "Emissionsminderung in der Legehennenhaltung." Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden, 2007. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:swb:14-1188390509636-25613.
Full textLin, Yen-Hsi, and 林妍希. "Reduction Measures Enforcement of Low-Carbon Emission for Farming Society – A Case Study of Town A on Chiayi County." Thesis, 2011. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/g5pn5j.
Full text國立臺北科技大學
環境工程與管理研究所
99
The study applies Town A in Chiayi County as the case study, to collect data and explore the daily routines of regional villagers and the status of greenhouse gas emission from agricultural activities through inventory. The philosophy and spirit of German Jühnde Village, the biomass energy plant, and the voluntary participation of carbon reduction from daily life supported by the public, are estimated to reduce carbon dioxide emission using different low-carbon measures. The result is then compared with the greenhouse gas produced by the Town. Research studies show that the greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural department mainly come from methane emission in rice cultivation, nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural soils (use of fertilizers), and methane emissions from livestock enteric fermentation; other greenhouse gas emissions of family department mainly come from transportation and electricity consumption. During the period from 2007~2009, the greenhouse gas emission from Town A averaged about 64,703 tons/year and 3.88 tons per capita per year. Taking into consideration of factors such as the greenhouse gas emission from Town A, agricultural waste and pollution reduction, and levels of cooperation in public, nine reduction measures have been chosen as the actions taken for greenhouse gas reduction. Taking 2009 as the base year, the reduction effectiveness of implementing various measures are estimated for 2012, 2015 and 2020, with the results showing that the total carbon dioxide reduction for 2020 is 46,277 tons/year, accounting approximately 72.09% of the total greenhouse gas emissions in 2009. The no-regrets approach to carbon reduction among the various measures yields the most reduction amount in carbon dioxide. In the example of 2020, the reduction accounts approximately 54.6% of the total carbon dioxide reduction and only change of living habits could easily achieve such carbon reduction benefits. In contrast, measure of promoting tree planning in public yields the least carbon reduction, which accounts for only 0.4% of total carbon dioxide reduction.
KALKUŠ, Václav. "Environmentální dopady produkce vajec z hlediska produkce skleníkových plynů." Master's thesis, 2013. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-154490.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Emission reduction, poultry farming"
Banhazi, Thomas. "Emission reduction from livestock buildings using a filtration device." In Air Quality and Livestock Farming, 299–306. Boca Raton : CRC Press/Balkema, 2018. | Series: Sustainable energy developments ; Volume 15: CRC Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315738338-18.
Full textCui, Yuanlong, Xuan Xue, and Saffa Riffat. "Cost Effectiveness of Poultry Production by Sustainable and Renewable Energy Source." In Meat and Nutrition. IntechOpen, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97543.
Full text"AMMONIA EMISSION FROM TWO POULTRY MANURE DRYING SYSTEMS." In Odour and Ammonia Emissions from Livestock Farming, 61–68. Routledge, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203215975-8.
Full text"cannot be distinguished from odourless air by 50% of the panel members (DT50). This implies that the threshold is a barely detectable odour. The number of times a sample has to be diluted to reach threshold levels is a measure for the relative strength of the odour. The relative odour strength times the ventilation rate of the building results in the odour emission. This can be regarded as the total odour load per unit of time leaving the building. Finally the odour emission can be used in atmospheric dispersion models in order to calculate the odour threshold distance. Table 2 shows the results of the experiments as well as the relevant data of the pighouses at the time of sampling. During the measurements the ventilation rate between the pighouses varied. The difference are due to different ventilation rates and due to sampling in the morning or in the afternoon at different ambient temperatures. Table 2: Odour measurements Pighouse with separation Data of sampling 24.5.83 31.5.83 14.9.83 28.10.83 Number of pigs 158 158 158 157 Average liveweight (kg|1 _1 75 80 45 75 Ventilation rate (m3kg~ h~ ) 0.61 0.93 0.89 0.47 Dilutions to threshold (DT50) 770 1008 817 1634 Total odour emission (DT50/h.103) 5595 11902 5195 9103 Odour emission/pig (DT50/h) 35410 75326 32877 57980 Emission reduction/pig (%) 49 50 50 59 Pighouse with underslat slurry storage Data of sampling 24.5.83 31.5.83 14.9.83 28.10.83 Number of pigs 300 275 279 279 Average liveweight (kg) 80 90 45 85 Ventilation rate (m3kg~ h- ) 0.21 0 54 0.52 0.57 Dilutions to threshold (DT50) 4133 3068 2820 2903 Total odour emission (DT50/h.103) 20632 41234 18409 39205 Odour emission/pig (DT50/h) 68773 149942 65982 140520 Emission reduction/pig (%) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.= not applicable It can be concluded from Table 2 that the installation of filter nets reduced the odour emission per pig by approximately 50%." In Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming, 233. CRC Press, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781482286311-93.
Full text"phenols from piggeries. The total amounts are given in addition to the amounts of butyric acid and p-cresol which are both known as intensively smelling compounds. The recognition odour threshold values of these two components are included, as well. Under the assumption of a dust concentration of 10 mg/m3 (7) one cubic meter of air from a pig house contains 6.27 pg dust-borne VFA and 2.76 |j g dust-borne phenol ic/i ndol i c compounds; 62.7 mg VFA and 27.6 mg phenolic/indolic compounds are emitted from a 500 pig fattening unit per hour at a medium ventilation rate of 20m3/70kg pig-h. When comparing the dust-borne concentrations of butyric acid and p-cresol with the odour thresholds it seems that the concentrations are too small to be relevant for an odour nui sance. However, if the dust is removed from the gas phase of the air from animal houses the odour disappears ( 39),(40) ,(14). This supports the opinion of HAMMOND et al. (40) that the odor is concentrated on the dust particles. The authors conclude from their data that the concentration^ of the two odorants bu tyric acid and p-cresol is about 4 • 10 greater on an aerosol particle than it is in an equal volume of air. Thus, an aero sol particle deposited on the olfactory organ carries odour equivalent to a much greater volume of air (40). These consid erations indicate that dust from animal houses should be taken into account in connection with odour emission/immission meas urements not only by chemical analysis but by sensory evalua tions using olfactometers without dustfilters, as well. 5. CONTROL OF DUST-BORNE ODOURS There are basically two ways of controlling dust-borne odours. An effective way seems to be the filtration of the air to remove the dust (41). VAN GEELEN (14) reports on the reduc tion of the odour emission from a broiler house with 15.000 animals of 65% by means of filter bags when filtering the ex haust air. However, the investments and running costs amounted to about DM 4.00 per 100 birds per year. The second way is to avoid the dust release in the animal house as far as possible. The following possibilities are recommended: - feeding intervals, no self-feeding (17) - pellets instead of meal feed - wet feeding instead of dry feeding (25) - vacuum cleaning, fogging and showering (22) A reduction of the dust content in the air of animal con finements bare not only the chance to diminish the odour emis sion from the animal houses but can have a positive influence on the animals' health and performance, as well. Acknowledgement The author wants to express his thanks to Dr. W.Heidmann, Chem-mical Institute for his help in preparing Table IV, Dr.G.Klink-mann for revising the English text, Mr. K.H. Linkert for doing the drawing, and Mrs. U. Arzt for typing the manuscript." In Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming, 338. CRC Press, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781482286311-132.
Full text"emission of dust-borne odourants like volatile fatty acids (VFA) and simple phenols and indoles from piggeries, the impor tance of particle-borne odours, and the possibilities of con trolling dust-borne odours. 2. ORIGIN, NATURE AND RELEASE OF THE DUST It is estimated that the dust in animal houses originates mainly from the feed (15 ), (16 ), (17 ), the bedding material (18), (19), the manure (20) and the animals themselves (21),(22). Relevant values are rare. Table I shows that feed and bedding, when used, are the predominant sources of dust in pig and hen houses. Dust from animal houses consists mainly of organic matter (23). The preferred technique for investigating both the mate rial composition of the dust and feed stuff is the WEENDER An alysis Technique (24). Table II shows the composition of dust from pig and hen houses compared to the feed fed. The differ ences in the protein content between dust and feed support the opinion that an important part of the dust originates from feathers, hairs, and skin cells of the animals. The release of the dust is caused by the activity of ani mals or man or the function of technical equipments in the an imal house. Feeding, particularly dry feeding (25), as well as bedding and cleaning activities, the use of different systems of feed distribution, manure removal and ventilation (26) can increase the dust level in the air of animal houses consider ably (27). Figure 1 gives an example of the relation between the amount of dust in the air and different activities based on values as reported by CERMAK and ROSS (27) for poultry houses. In the course of a day the dust level in animal houses varies considerably. Mostly feeding increases the dust concen tration in the air as demonstrated in Figure 2 (22). However, within 30 to 120 min the "normal" background level is reached again (16),(22). The figure shows that even before the feed is distributed, the activity of the animals increases the dust concentration in the air considerably. Table III shows the influence of rel . humidity, pen vol ume, feeding system and air flow on the number of dust parti cles and weight of settled dust in an experimental piggery.The essential influence of animal activity on the formation of dust is shown by the fact that self-feeding results in significant ly greater atmospheric dust concentration (particles/volume of air) than does floor-feeding. However, a significantly greater amount of settled dust is associated with floor feeding. Prob ably, the self-fed pigs spend much more time eating than the floor-fed pigs. The intense activity of the pigs during floor feeding results in a great deal of visible dust for only a pe riod of time, while the self-fed pigs may play with the excess feed (28),(17). These studies indicate that the factors deter mining the amount of dust in confinements include animal ac tivity, temperature, relative humidity, ventilation rate,stock ing density and volumetric air-space per animal, feeding method, and nature of feed. This dust originating from various sources can carry gases, vapours and odours (7)." In Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming, 336. CRC Press, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781482286311-130.
Full text"efficiency. By measurements of total odour strength in a treatment plant the ED values pointed out the sludge press and dewatering process as the predominant odour sources of the plant. In the venting air from this position extremely high ED values were recorded. This air was led through a carbon filter for odour reduction. Olfactometric measurements at the filter revealed poor odour reducing efficiency. It was observed that odour compounds were not destroyed in the filter. They only restrained until the carbon became saturated, and thereafter evaporated into the outlet air contributing to the odour strength. The filter capacity was obviously too small for the heavy load. Attempts to reduce the odour strength before the filter did not succeed, until the air was led through a container filled with saturated lime slurry (pH = 12-14). The slurry was part of a precipitation process in the plant. Dispersion in the alkaline slurry extensively reduced the odour strength of the air, resulting in sufficient capacity of the carbon filter also when handling heavy loads of sewage sludge. Since then the carbon filter has worked well, within the limitation of such filters in general. Neither is it observed signs indicating reduced precipitation properties of the lime slurry. Measurements of total odour strength in combustion processes imply sampling challenges. Beside the chemical scrubber process, combustion of odorous air is the best odour reducing method. The disadvantage of this process is the high energy costs. Treatment at apropriate conditions, however, will destroy the odorous compounds extensively. Temperatures about 850 C and contact time up to 3 seconds are reported (2,3). Olfactometric measurements in combustion processes involve certain sampling problems caused by the temperature difference between inlet and outlet. The humidity of outlet air must also be taken into consideration. Problems may occur when hot outlet air is sampled at low temperatures. In most such cases sampling is impossible without special arrangements. Such conditions are present during odour measurements in fish meal plants with combustion as the odour reducing method. The largest problem turned out to be the temperature differences between outlet air (85-220 C) and outdoor temperatures (0-15 C), causing condensation. The dew point of the outlet air was calculated, and experiments were carried out with dilution of the outlet air to prevent condensation in the sampling bags. Condensation was prevented by diluting the outlet air 5-150 times with dry, purified N gas. Comparison of N -diluted and undiluted samples revealed large differences in ED value. In samples demanding a high degree of dilution to prevent condensation, the measured odour strength was up to 5 times higher than in the undiluted corresponding samples. Samples demanding less dilution showed less deviating results. 4. CONCLUSIONS In the attempt to minimize odour emission, olfactometric measurements of total odour strength give useful informations about the odour reducing efficiency of different processes as a function of parameters like dosage of chemicals in scrubbers, humidity and temperature in packed filters, flow rates, etc. Olfactometric measurements also point out the main odour sources of the plant. From a set of olfactometric data combined with other essential." In Odour Prevention and Control of Organic Sludge and Livestock Farming, 98. CRC Press, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781482286311-34.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Emission reduction, poultry farming"
Priekulis, Juris, Armins Laurs, and Ligita Melece. "Ammonia emission reduction measures in dairy cattle farming." In 18th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development. Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/erdev2019.18.n091.
Full textHong Li, Hongwei Xin, and Robert T. Burns. "Reduction of Ammonia Emission from Stored Poultry Manure Using Additives: Zeolite, Al+clear, Ferix-3 and PLT." In 2006 Portland, Oregon, July 9-12, 2006. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.21166.
Full textHuppmann, Gerhard. "The MTU Carbonate Fuel Cell HotModule®: Utilization of Biomass and Waste Originated Fuels for Polygeneration in Fuel Cells." In ASME 2006 4th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology. ASMEDC, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/fuelcell2006-97120.
Full text