Relevant bibliographies by topics / Engelbert Dollfuss

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Engelbert Dollfuss'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Engelbert Dollfuss.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Engelbert Dollfuss"

1

Rath, R. John. "The Molding of Engelbert Dollfuß as an Agrarian Reformer." Austrian History Yearbook 28 (January 1997): 173–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0067237800016374.

Full text
Abstract:
Engelbert Dollfuss has not been enshrined in history as a popular political figure. The National Socialists vilified him as a Satanic evildoer who embodied everything they hated. Dollfuß's widow and two children found it imperative to flee to Switzerland immediately after the Anschluss and eventually went to Canada, where Mrs. Dollfuß and their daughter remained until 1956. Their son still lives there.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rath, R. John. "Thr Dollguß Ministry: The Intensification of Animosities and the Drift toward Authoritarianism." Austrian History Yearbook 30 (January 1999): 65–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0067237800015964.

Full text
Abstract:
When Engelbert Dollfuss became chancellor of Austria in May 1932, no one dreamed that he would become a fascist dicator.1 Even his bitter opponents in 1933 and 1934 admitted that he was genuine democrat when he became chancellor. He had friendly relations with the leaders of the Social Democratic Party. In May 1932, the Social Democratic Party leader Otto Bauer felt that when the time was ripe Dollfuß intended to form a coalition with his party.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

von Dassanowsky, Robert. "Screening Transcendence: Austria's Emigrantenfilm and the Construction of an Austrofascist Identity in Singende Jugend." Austrian History Yearbook 39 (April 2008): 157–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0667237808000096.

Full text
Abstract:
Political developments between 1933 and 1934 placed Austrian cinema under more governmental control than at any time since World War I. In 1934 the new chancellor, Engelbert Dollfuss, attempted to counter a looming civil war and the growing power of the Austrian National Socialists by disbanding the embattled parliament and instituting a nonparty clerico-authoritarian corporate state, often referred to as Austrofascist. Although Dollfuss's Fatherland Front was intended to be a national unity movement above party politics, it was, in fact, led by the conservative, Catholic-oriented Christian Social Party. Subsequent laws, which outlawed all political parties, may have temporarily silenced the National Socialists, but they also alienated a substantial portion of Austria's electorate that had supported the Social Democrats.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kirk, Tim. "The Austrian Historians' Commission." Austrian History Yearbook 40 (April 2009): 288–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0067237809000216.

Full text
Abstract:
It is a truth universally acknowledged that nowhere is the past a greater burden on the present than in the historian's own area of interest. In Austria, in 2008, the past seemed to be more than usually present. From the outset, it was declared a year of multiple anniversaries; and the years 1848, 1918, 1968, and above all 1938 were recalled in conferences and books and in public discussion in the media. And yet some aspects of the past were curiously absent: Austrian democracy, we learned from an events listings handout distributed at Vienna airport, was established in 1918—only to be extinguished by the Nazis in 1938. In this context, Oliver Rathkolb's finding (presented at a conference on democracy held at the Vienna Museum in March), that forty percent of Austrians do not even know who Engelbert Dollfuss was, is hardly surprising. This is not to say that there is no engagement with the thornier questions of Austria's past—in the University's Institut für Zeitgeschichte, there is talk of little else—but that there is now, as delegates at the same conference agreed, something of a gulf between the general public's understanding of the past and that of academic historians and some sections of the press.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

John Rath, R. "The Dollfuß Ministry: The Democratic Prelude." Austrian History Yearbook 29, no. 1 (January 1998): 161–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0067237800014843.

Full text
Abstract:
The typical dictator of the interwar period was, like Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini, already a convinced fascist or authoritarian when he first came to power. This was not the case in Austria, where Engelbert Dollfuß, the semifascist dictator of 1934, was seemingly a genuine democrat when he was appointed chancellor in May 1932. Even his appointment was accidental. Had the Social Democrats accepted Ignaz Seipel's and Karl Buresch's overtures in 1931 to join the Christian Socials in a coalition government, Dollfuß might never have become chancellor. And had they not rejected a second effort by Buresch in April 1932 and demanded new elections, democratic government in Austria would have been strengthened rather than weakened.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Czerwińska-Schupp, Ewa. "Faszyzm austriacki (1934–1938) – założenia filozoficzno-ideowe, ustrojowe i praktyka polityczna." Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna 1, no. 2 (July 31, 2018): 87–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/fped.2012.1.2.5.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this article consists in presentation of Austrian fascism (austrofascism) embodied in the Federal State of Austria 1934–1938. The State represented an important episode in the history of European authoritarianism. In the following paper I address four issues: (1) philosophical, ideological, and doctrinal justification of Austrian fascism, (2) legal and constitutional principles of the regime of Engelbert Dollfuß and Kurt Schuschnigg, (3) relationship between the formal structure of Federal State and the socio-political reality. Finally, (4) I try to answer two interrelated questions concerning the nature of the austrofascist dictatorship and the legitimacy of considering austrofascism as a system of government in the context of phenomenon of fascism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Grab, Alexander, Pieter M. Judson, and James Miller. "R. John Rath: Historian." Austrian History Yearbook 32 (January 2001): 9–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0067237800011139.

Full text
Abstract:
In All likelihood, Reuben John Rath will be best remembered by Austrian historians for his achievements as an “academic entrepreneur, ” if only because enterprises like the Austrian History Yearbook have provided a common institutional bond that unites all of us in the field. Nonetheless, there are many scholars who will recognize him most for more solitary scholarly endeavors that he pursued with such persistence in European archives and with such painstaking care at the controls of a manual type-writer. Six decades of scholarship have produced three books and more than thirty articles in field-specific journals like the Journal of Central European Affairs, the Austrian History Yearbook, and Der Donauraum, as well as in the American Historical Review and the Journal of Modern History. Moreover, his work has made lasting contributions to three discrete fields of modern Austrian history. Hence the need to divide this historiographical retrospective into three segments on Napoleonic and Restoration Italy (by Alexander Grab), the Revolutions of 1848 (by Pieter M. Judson), and Engelbert Dollfuβ(by James Miller).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lewis, Gavin. "James William Miller. Engelbert Dollfufβ als Agrarfachmann. Eine Analysebäuerlicher Führungsbegriffe und österreichischer Agrarpolitik 1918–1934. In Böhlaus Zeitgeschichtliche Bibliothek, Band 10. Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, 1989. Pp. 165." Austrian History Yearbook 25 (January 1994): 273–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0067237800006792.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Engelbert Dollfuss"

1

Dreidemy, Lucile. ""Denn ein Engel kann nicht sterben" : Engelbert Dollfus 1934-2012 : eine Biographie des Posthumen." Thesis, Strasbourg, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012STRAC026/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Engelbert Dollfuß, chancelier et dictateur autrichien entre 1932 et 1934, mourut le 25 juillet 1934 au cours d’une tentative de putsch de Nationaux-Socialistes. Aujourd’hui, il constitue l’une des personnalités les plus controversées de l’Histoire Contemporaine autrichienne. Alors que de nombreuses recherches ont déjà été menées sur le régime dictatorial mis en place par Dollfuß et repris après sa mort par Kurt Schuschnigg, aucun travail ne s’est porté jusqu’à présent sur le mythe entourant la figure de Dollfuß. Comment est née la controverse qui survit aujourd´hui autour de Dollfuß ? Sur quels schémas narratifs le mythe a-t-il été construit puis développé? Quels en ont été les acteurs ? Quelles fonctions politiques et identitaires a joué le mythe de Dollfuß pour chacun des grands partis politiques autrichiens et, au-delà, dans l’avènement tardif de la « nation autrichienne » ? C’est à ces questions, jusqu’alors toutes inexplorées, que cette thèse tente de répondre
In an experimental biographical form, this thesis traces the “posthumous life” of the Austrian Chancellor who ruled as a dictator from 1933, and was killed by the Nazis on 25 July 1934. Although the majority of the population is ignorant of Dollfuss, he remains, paradoxically, the most controversial figure in contemporary Austrian history, and his legacy continues to provoke political scandal and controversy. The theoretical part of the dissertation deals mainly with the mechanisms of construction of political myths and their social functions; in addition, it considers the possibility of the posthumous survival of a historical figure as part of his or her biography. Using the tools of both historical and critical discourse analysis, this project investigates the evolution of the versatile Dollfuss myth, considers its various forms of expression through different media, and assesses its actors and their political and ideological interests
Am 25. Juli 1934 wurde der seit März 1933 diktatorisch regierende österreichische Bundeskanzler Engelbert Dollfuß im Laufe eines Putschversuchs der illegalen österreichischen Nationalsozialisten getötet. Nach seinem Tod „überlebte“ Dollfuß in Form eines facettenreichen Mythos, der bis heute geschichtspolitische Wellen schlägt und in politischen, religiösen und akademischen Kreisen weiterhin kontrovers diskutiert wird. Diesem bewegten Nachleben widmet sich diese Dissertation in Form einer experimentellen „Biographie des Posthumen“. Der theoretische Teil der Arbeit widmet sich zunächst den Mechanismen der Entstehung politischer Mythen sowie ihren identitätsstiftenden Funktionen. Darüber hinaus wird der Stellenwert von Personenmythen in der Biographieforschung hinterfragt und die Relevanz der Einbeziehung des „Posthumen“ in die biographische Perspektive hervorgehoben. Gestützt auf diesen theoretischen Unterbau und mithilfe der Instrumente der historischen und kritischen Diskursanalyse analysiert die Dissertation die Entstehung des Dollfuß-Mythos und dessen Entwicklung im Laufe der letzten 78 Jahre, untersucht seine verschiedenen medialen Ausdrucksformen und fragt nach den geschichtspolitischen Akteuren des Mythos sowie ihren politischen Interessen. Diese Untersuchung bettet sich in eine breitere Reflexion über die Opportunität oder Inopportunität des Dollfuß-Mythos im Hinblick auf den langwierigen Prozess der österreichischen Nationsbildung und Identitätsstiftung ein
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Šepták, Miroslav. "Engelbert Dollfuss a střední Evropa 1932-1933." Master's thesis, 2008. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-294055.

Full text
Abstract:
The diploma paper which I was elaborating is focused on the first year of the governance Austrian chancellor Engelbert Doll fuss. Data of that governance were taken from unpublished sources of Czech, Austrian and German province as well as from published Czech, Austrian and German sources. In area of economy he decided to apply the strict deflation policy as a result of big economic depression. Business strategy of such country led to the only one effort - to sign new business agreements established on preferential base. At the beginning of Dollfuss's governance there existed a possibility of big coalition with social democrats but step by step the ideological difference was increasing. The more threat was coming from Nazism the more isolated Austrian policy turned. The chancellor was trying to strengthen political power of parliamentary majority which was very weak. Unsuccessfully. This non success made him put his mind to the alternative form of regime. The piece of luck helped him to get out from unpleasant situation. He took advantage of formal lack of Austrian pluralism and was continually setting up authoritative regime. In area of foreign policy he reduced options of Danube's federation as well as orientation to France because he didn't consider these possibilities profitable for Austria. He had...
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Šepták, Miroslav. "K politickému a hospodářskému vývoji Rakouska v letech 1931-1934." Doctoral thesis, 2013. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-326586.

Full text
Abstract:
1 About Political and Economic Development of Austria in Years 1931-1934 Miroslav Šepták Abstract The aim of the presented dissertation is the analysis of the Austrian foreign political development in the years 1931-1934 with the emphasis on the general development of the international relations. Furthermore, the selected intra-political events and the economic and social development of Austria will not be omitted as well. The time frame of the presented dissertation, i.e. years 1931 and 1934, has been chosen with respect to the important events which exceeded the Austrian boarders because of their significance and impact on the contemporary international politics. The first milestone is connected with publication of the plan of the German-Austrian customs union. Assassination of the Austrian Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss represents the second milestone. There occurs the deficit of the detailed analysis of the Austrian foreign policy, especially in the relationship towards Germany and Italy, in the existing historiography so far. It is particularly the absence of comparison of unpublished documents, Austrian, German and Czechoslovak, with related published sources, contemporary memoirs and press articles as well as scholarly literature. The presented dissertation, which is the result of the four-year...
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Engelbert Dollfuss"

1

Walterskirchen, Gudula. Engelbert Dollfuss: Arbeitermörder oder Heldenkanzler. Wien: Molden, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dollfuss, Engelbert. Der Führer bin ich selbst: Engelbert Dollfuss, Benito Mussolini Briefwechsel. Wien: Löcker, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Miller, James William. Engelbert Dollfuss and Austrian agriculture: An authoritarian democrat and his policies. Ann Arbor, Mich: University Microfilms International, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

1947-, Luksan Martin, Schlosser Hermann, and Szanya Anton 1945-, eds. Heilige Scheine: Marco d'Aviano, Engelbert Dollfuss und der österreichische Katholizismus. Wien: Promedia, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

1947-, Luksan Martin, Schlösser Hermann, and Szanya Anton 1945-, eds. Heilige Scheine: Marco d'Aviano, Engelbert Dollfuss und der österreichische Katholizismus. Wien: Promedia, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Engelbert Dollfuss"

1

Dreidemy, Lucile. "Dollfuß – biografisch. Eine Längsschnittanalyse des biografischen Diskurses über Engelbert Dollfuß." In Österreich 1933-1938, 242–56. Wien: Böhlau Verlag, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.7767/boehlau.9783205792291.242.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Jeřábek, Martin. "Bundeskanzler Engelbert Dollfuß und Österreich als selbständiger „zweiter deutscher Staat“ in Mitteleuropa in den Jahren 1932–1934." In Mitteleuropa denken: Intellektuelle, Identitäten und Ideen, edited by Walter Pape and Jiří Šubrt, 75–90. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110536003-006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"Engelbert Dollfuss and Austrian Agriculture." In The Dollfuss/Schuschnigg Era in Austria, edited by James William Miller, 122–42. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315131818-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography