To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Entrepreneurship, innovation.
Journal articles on the topic 'Entrepreneurship, innovation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Entrepreneurship, innovation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Krylova, Оlena, and Kostiantyn Shaposhnykov. "ACTIVATION OF INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT." Three Seas Economic Journal 1, no. 1 (June 10, 2020): 66–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2020-1-18.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of the article is to develop proposals for intensifying the development of innovative entrepreneurship in Ukraine. The importance of intensifying innovative entrepreneurship is recognized by any business entity, because new innovative ideas, solutions embodied in a particular product can provide competitive advantages. The presence of entrepreneurial initiative by business entities, the use of effective tools to stimulate innovation, creativity and effectiveness of innovation can significantly enhance innovation entrepreneurship and overall efficiency of the innovation process. The methodological basis of this work is the synthesis of general scientific methods of theoretical and empirical research (method of cognition, analysis and synthesis, generalization and systematization of information). Results. Innovative entrepreneurship covers all stages of the innovation cycle: from the initiation of a new idea to obtaining specific results from the market use of the product. The main subjects of innovative entrepreneurship can be any enterprises and organizations that carry out innovative activities or are innovatively active. To develop effective measures to intensify innovative entrepreneurship, first of all, it is advisable to focus on identifying the strengths and weaknesses of innovative entrepreneurship, as well as opportunities and threats for its intensification in Ukraine. In this sense, it is important to assess the current level of innovation process, its staffing and financial resources, the level of innovation infrastructure, the establishment of integration relations between the main participants in the innovation process, the effectiveness of innovation, demand for innovative products and more. Practical implications. The analysis allowed us to reveal certain results. The strengths of the possible activation of the innovative enterprise include: the presence of a high level of personnel component of scientific potential, which characterizes the ability to generate new ideas; accumulated experience of successful innovation, cooperation between science and business, as evidenced by the main indicators of innovation, the number of innovationactive enterprises and enterprises in industry that implement innovations. Weaknesses for the intensification of innovative entrepreneurship should be highlighted: insufficient funding for science and education; declining trends in almost all performance indicators of innovation, which requires rapid implementation of measures to curb their further development in the field of innovation. Thus, in order to intensify innovative entrepreneurship in the near future, it is advisable to implement a number of measures, the tasks of which cover the following main areas of change: clear awareness of the national economy’s ability to innovate, create conditions for new products, increase its competitiveness; ensuring diversification of sources of financing of innovative activity of enterprises in order to reduce the costs of acquisition and use of innovative products; establishing close and productive interaction of the main participants of innovative entrepreneurship. Value/originality. The use of comprehensive analysis allows to identify the main problems of hidden entrepreneurship, taking into account the specifics of its manifestation in modern conditions.
2
Prasad, Ghimire Rudra. "Sectoral Social Entrepreneurship Innovation Opportunities in Nepal." Business Inform 11, no. 514 (2020): 54–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-11-54-58.
Full textAbstract:
Social entrepreneurship is a mix of sectoral innovation and resource availability by which social problems are treated as the ones handicapping a societie’s needs. It is a new dimension of the business sector. In Nepal, like everywhere in the world, a model of social entrepreneurship has been developed by several social innovators. The main aim of this research is to analyze the sectoral social entrepreneurship and innovation practices in Nepal. This paper is based on scientific review with reference to the social entrepreneurship and innovation in the context of Nepal economy. This subject matter is highly recognized due to its broad scope in terms of educational innovation, business innovation, environmental innovation, social innovation, financial innovation, technical innovations, innovations in all the sectors of economy, and, finally, innovations in the living standard of Nepalese people. Nepal needs social and economic transformation, which can be made by building socially responsive citizens. Thus, the context of Nepal suggests an opportunity for sectoral and structural innovations. Social innovations can make Nepal smart and strong. So, the government should create the environment for the social enterprise sector in Nepal.
3
Prasad, Ghimire Rudra. "Sectoral Social Entrepreneurship Innovation Opportunities in Nepal." Business Inform 11, no. 514 (2020): 54–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-11-54-58.
Full textAbstract:
Social entrepreneurship is a mix of sectoral innovation and resource availability by which social problems are treated as the ones handicapping a societie’s needs. It is a new dimension of the business sector. In Nepal, like everywhere in the world, a model of social entrepreneurship has been developed by several social innovators. The main aim of this research is to analyze the sectoral social entrepreneurship and innovation practices in Nepal. This paper is based on scientific review with reference to the social entrepreneurship and innovation in the context of Nepal economy. This subject matter is highly recognized due to its broad scope in terms of educational innovation, business innovation, environmental innovation, social innovation, financial innovation, technical innovations, innovations in all the sectors of economy, and, finally, innovations in the living standard of Nepalese people. Nepal needs social and economic transformation, which can be made by building socially responsive citizens. Thus, the context of Nepal suggests an opportunity for sectoral and structural innovations. Social innovations can make Nepal smart and strong. So, the government should create the environment for the social enterprise sector in Nepal.
4
Odinokova, Tatyana, Mariyana Bozhinova, and Mariana Petrova. "Promotion of Innovative Entrepreneurship Under Sustainable Development." E3S Web of Conferences 41 (2018): 04015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104015.
Full textAbstract:
The subject matter of this article is incentives for innovations in entrepreneurship. There are two models of entrepreneurship which exist in developed market economies – traditional and innovative. Innovations have never been so important as they are now, which holds particularly true for small and medium-sized businesses. As Peter F.Drucker formulated it, “Innovation is the specific tool of entrepreneurs, the means by which they exploit change as an opportunity for a different business or a different service.” The methods by which innovations are encouraged change from country to country. The choice of such methods depends on economic, political and other conditions for a country&s development. By encouraging innovative activities, governments enhance the effectiveness of innovative systems and create favorable conditions for enterprises to engage in science and technology. For the EU, which falls behind the USA and Japan in so far as innovation technologies are concerned, it is a highpriority task to implement the innovation development strategy and to transform its economy in accordance with the up-to-date model by 2020. The aim of such strategy is to achieve industrial leadership as well as to support business, including small and medium-sized businesses.
5
Omar, Maktoba, and Michael Lewrick. "Entrepreneurship Competencies and Management Capabilities for Innovation and sustainable Growth." International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation 1, no. 3 (July 2010): 48–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jeei.2010070104.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of this chapter is to challenge the context of entrepreneurship competences and management capabilities needed for innovation. We build our arguments in step with actual practice analyzing data from over 200 innovative companies which have been created under the formal requirements of a regional business plan competition during the last 10 years. This study explores the crucial capabilities to start an innovative business and discuss the capabilities have to be developed to sustain innovation and business growth. Therefore, it can be hypothesised that entrepreneurship and innovation education provided by Universities, Centres for Entrepreneurship and through coaching by Business Plan Competitions should focus on building awareness for the necessity of innovations and prepare inventors, entrepreneurs and students for not simply starting an enterprise but the change process in growing companies. The questions are not of whether or not to educate people about entrepreneurship and innovation but rather what are the context and the capabilities needed to sustain business and become an innovative and successful entrepreneur?
6
Krejci, P., and J. Sebestova. "Innovative Literacy Levels: Gender Age and Education Matters." Marketing and Management of Innovations, no. 4 (2019): 353–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.4-27.
Full textAbstract:
This paper presents the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the issue of an innovation activity, which is very important for entrepreneurship and is considered a significant competitive advantage. However, there are factors such as education, age and gender that can influence innovation creation. The main purpose of the research is finding out how innovation creation is related to the gender, age and education of entrepreneurs in common entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship. The systematic literature review has shown that innovative activity is supported by entrepreneurial competencies. The relevance of the decision of this scientific problem is that they are few studies focusing on that problem. Investigation of the topic of innovative activity in the paper is carried out in the following logical sequence: (1) literature review concerning on innovative activity, typology and modern trends in innovations (2) possibilities of competencies needed for innovations, (3) case study background, based on literature review and previous studies (4) presentation of key results concerning gender, which was found to have no significance regarding entrepreneurship. Methodological tools of the research methods were sociological survey, data analysis. As a result of the calculations, the main issues of innovative activities were detected. The main results were analysed using Cluster analysis and tests of statistical significance. The paper presents the results of an empirical analysis that shows the main gaps in the innovation classification when pure and combined innovation types are presented. The research empirically confirms and theoretically proves the necessity of doing the following steps: inform and educate entrepreneurs in the area of innovation, not only to support innovative activities financially. The findings have practical significance and the results of the research can be useful for public supporters and educational organizations how to work with entrepreneurs with innovative ideas. Keywords: competencies, determinants of innovations, innovations, literacy.
7
Khamdamova, G. "Ways to Improve the Activities of Innovative Entrepreneurship in the Republic of Uzbekistan." Bulletin of Science and Practice 7, no. 3 (March 15, 2021): 218–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/64/23.
Full textAbstract:
This article examines the prospects for the development of innovative entrepreneurship in Uzbekistan, which contributes to the activation of innovative entrepreneurship as one of the key subjects of innovation, ensuring the rapid and effective development and commercialization of various types of innovations.
8
RIEPINA, Inna. "TRANSFORMATIONAL ANALYSIS AND FORECAST OF INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT IN UKRAINE." Economy of Ukraine 2018, no. 11-12 (December 7, 2018): 19–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2018.11.019.
Full textAbstract:
Cognition and systematic study of the essence of innovation processes remain extremely relevant scientific and applied problems. The article deals with state and prospects for the innovative entrepreneurship development in Ukraine compared with the countries of innovation enclave to search for catalysts for its activation. The basis of the generalizations and conclusions were the works of domestic and foreign scientists, normative-legislative acts, public reports and plans for the innovative development of Ukraine in various time intervals, data of the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, Eurostat, Startup Ranking and Global Innovation Index. In course of the research the author applied a wide range of general scientific and special methods of cognition. To perform a transformational analysis of the innovative entrepreneurship development, the ADIE 7D descriptive model is proposed, which is based on the following seven descriptors: (i) GDP science intensity; (ii) venture financing of innovation activity; (iii) share of enterprises engaged in innovations; (iv) the number of registered patents; (v) implementation of innovation projects (start-ups); (vi) ecosystem of innovative entrepreneurship; (vii) Global Innovation Index. The model allows identifying the stimulants and destimulators of influence on the process of creating a favorable environment of innovative activity. The following should be noted among the key stimulators of the innovative entrepreneurship development: significant innovation potential, entrepreneurial enthusiasm and creativity of innovators. However, the lack of adequate funding and a harmonized ecosystem of innovative entrepreneurship is becoming an obstacle to radical changes aimed at the innovative breakthrough of our country. Based on the results of the analysis, the author presents a strategic map of innovative entrepreneurship development in Ukraine by descriptors of the proposed model. In the course of the further research it is planned to supplement this ADIE 7D descriptive model by implementing new promising descriptors to deepen analytical procedures.
9
Oly Ndubisi, Nelson. "Entrepreneurship and service innovation." Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 29, no. 6 (June 30, 2014): 449–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jbim-07-2013-0148.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to introduce a special issue on entrepreneurship and service innovation, and to conceptualize the link between entrepreneurial orientation, innovation and entrepreneurship or new entry. Design/methodology/approach – Analysis of secondary data. Findings – Entrepreneurial orientation (EO), innovation (IN) and entrepreneurship are in a vital “triadic connect”, where EO supports innovation in organizations and innovation promotes new entry or new venture creation – a vehicle for commercialization of innovations. Research limitations/implications – There is a need for empirical validation of the linkages proposed in this conceptual paper. Practical implications – This “triadic connect” between EO, IN and entrepreneurship or new entry is a source of or key driver of organizational performance (OP) and competitive advantage (CA). Originality/value – The theorization and schematization of the “triadic connect” (i.e. EO–IN–NE link) and outcomes (namely, OP and CA) is presented.
10
Gartner, William B., and Peter F. Drucker. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship." Academy of Management Review 12, no. 1 (January 1987): 172. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258006.
Full text
11
Johnson, Les. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship." Journal of Information Technology 1, no. 2 (June 1986): 55–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jit.1986.24.
Full text
12
Maritz, Alex, and Jerome Donovan. "Entrepreneurship and innovation." Education + Training 57, no. 1 (February 9, 2015): 74–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/et-02-2013-0018.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the synergies, similarities and differences between entrepreneurship and innovation education and training programs, with the aim of challenging the context of such programs. Design/methodology/approach – This study utilises an extensive review of extant literature in the fields of innovation, entrepreneurship and education. The literature, propositions and discussion are intended to provide a bridge between entrepreneurship and innovation education and training programs and seek to address the scientific legitimacy of these education and training disciplines as separate, yet integrated disciplines. Findings – Identifies a need to reconsider the diversity and relationship between innovation and entrepreneurship education and training, primarily from contextual, theoretical, measurement, distinctiveness, content, pedagogical and typology points of view. The range of multiple teaching models and learning processes to embrace in various contexts. Research limitations/implications – The propositions allow for the combination of teaching initiatives in a theory-driven framework and their applicability to specific entrepreneurship and innovation education and training situations. Practical implications – The authors’ contribution identifies the synergies and differences between entrepreneurship education and training programs. The propositions highlight areas of contextualisation and practice-based view application, to adopt specific learning initiatives between constructs. Originality/value – The authors address a gap in the literature regarding the delineation of entrepreneurship and innovation education and training, which has thus far remained sparsely addressed in the education and training literature. The authors provide a practice-based view of propositions, developed for future testing.
13
Hatef, Elham, Joshua M. Sharfstein, and Alain B. Labrique. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship." Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 24, no. 2 (2018): 99–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000665.
Full text
14
Kanungo, Rabindra N. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation." Global Business Review 3, no. 2 (August 2002): 224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097215090200300204.
Full text
15
SHIREY, MARIA R. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship." Clinical Nurse Specialist 21, no. 1 (January 2007): 16–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002800-200701000-00005.
Full text
16
McLuskie, Peter. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship." International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 23, no. 1 (January 9, 2017): 159–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-06-2016-0181.
Full text
17
Veeraraghavan, Vimala. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation." Asia Pacific Business Review 5, no. 1 (January 2009): 14–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097324700900500102.
Full text
18
Crumpton, Michael A. "Innovation and entrepreneurship." Bottom Line 25, no. 3 (October 26, 2012): 98–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08880451211276539.
Full text
19
Sheffield, Emilyn A. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation." Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 59, no. 8 (October 1988): 33–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1988.10606278.
Full text
20
Martínez Velázquez, Nayeli, and Gabriela Dutrénit Bielous. "Determinants of innovative social entrepreneurship." Revista Brasileira de Inovação 18, no. 2 (August 16, 2019): 223–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v18i2.8652176.
Full textAbstract:
Innovative social entrepreneurship (ISE) is a topic of recent interest in research. The knowledge of the determinants of ISE and the characteristics of the innovations created by them is still limited. Therefore, the present document aims to contribute to this knowledge; specifically, it explores the determinants of the innovative behavior of ISE, during its process of creation and growth, and discusses the nature of such innovations (type, novelty, scope and impact) created throughout that process. Based on a case study of a paradigmatic Mexican social organization, we argue that these determinants are divided into: internal (characteristics of the individual entrepreneur and model/strategy of the organization); and external (context/environment). These determinants are causally associated with different stages of the abovementioned process and with certain attributes of the innovations developed. In addition, it is suggested that ISE innovation has a strong intangible and non-technological component, mainly in business model innovations, but also in its operating model (based on social inclusion).
21
Орлова-Курилова, Ольга Володимирівна. "ПОНЯТІЙНО-КАТЕГОРІАЛЬНИЙ ЗМІСТ ІННОВАЦІЙНОГО ПІДПРИЄМНИЦТВА З ПОЗИЦІЙ ЕВОЛЮЦІЇ ЕКОНОМІЧНОЇ ДУМКИ." Bulletin of the Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design. Series: Economic sciences 137, no. 4 (December 5, 2019): 29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.30857/2413-0117.2019.4.3.
Full textAbstract:
The article seeks to explore the key categories that characterize the phenomenon of innovative entrepreneurship. It is specified that from the conceptual and categorical perspectives, the innovative activity of business entities is considered as a complex characteristic with a range of complementary definitions which demonstrate ambiguity and contradiction in their interpretation. The domestic and foreign economic literature review has revealed that there is neither a common conceptual framework in this field of scientific knowledge, nor a harmonized definition of even such basic categories as innovation, novelties, invention, entrepreneurship, innovation activity, etc. among modern scholars and practitioners. The primary sources in the history of economic thought in the area of innovative entrepreneurship can be traced back to remote past, found in the works of foreign economists and political economists who developed a number of theories and concepts revealing the nature, forms and specific features of innovative activity, as well as suggesting methods and pathways to enhance its development. The study offers a more specified definition of innovative entrepreneurship viewing it as a complex category which entails such notions as innovation, entrepreneurship, innovation process, innovation activity, innovation environment, etc. The research findings provide argument why innovative entrepreneurship is critical for effective development of the national economy. The suggested methodological approach argues for the need to explore the innovative entrepreneurship concept both at the micro- and the macrolevels.
22
Zhao, Fang. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation in e-Business." International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 6, no. 1 (February 2005): 53–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/0000000053026428.
Full textAbstract:
This paper argues that a combination of entrepreneurship and innovation is a crucial factor for the long-term sustainability of e-commerce and e-businesses. Entrepreneurship and innovation are positively related to each other and interact to help an organization to flourish. The study takes an integrative approach to exploring the synergies between entrepreneurship and innovation and to analysing the factors that foster an interaction between the two. Case studies of entrepreneurial and innovative dot.com companies were conducted to complement a comprehensive literature review of entrepreneurship and innovation. This empirical study contributes to a better understanding of the existing theories and practices of entrepreneurship and innovation in organizations.
23
Gaweł, Aleksandra. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship in a Space-time Framework Based on the Case of Poland." Przedsiębiorczość - Edukacja 15, no. 2 (December 28, 2019): 24–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.24917/20833296.152.2.
Full textAbstract:
Although innovation and entrepreneurship have been subjects of researchers’ interests for years, nevertheless both the concepts and the relationships between them remain controversial. Since different indices are accepted for the measurement of these categories, the question is whether the relationship between them depends on the choice of measures. The aim of the paper is to indicate the innovation impact on the entrepreneurial process with regard to different measures of these concepts. The research was conducted with the use of regression analyses as a method and yearly data for Polish regions in the period 2003–2018. At the initial stage of the research as many measures of innovation and entrepreneurship as possible were introduced into the estimation of regression function parameters. Statistically insignificant variables were deleted at later stages of research. This research confirms that innovativeness and entrepreneurship are broad concepts and the relationship between them depends on the choice of measures. Saturation with enterprises and saturation with start-ups seem to be more sensitive to innovation than other measures of entrepreneurship. Innovation seen as input, measured by spending on research and development (R&D) has a bigger influence on entrepreneurship than the output innovation measured by revenues from innovative activities. Considering a relatively low level of explanatory power of innovations, it seems they are not the only factor influencing entrepreneurship.
24
Kovalska, Lyubov. "Methodical approach to analysis and evaluation of innovative enterprise development in regions of the Ukraine." Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine, no. 2(136) (2019): 66–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2019-2-12.
Full textAbstract:
The regions’ position in national competitive ability and the rankings of a country in global competitive environment is defined by innovative vector of economy development, the level of economic entities’ innovative activity, availability of fundamental and applied developments, technology transfer and integration of science and production, etc. Therefore, the issues of maintaining the development of innovative entrepreneurship in a region as an important direction of economy’s competitive ability at internal and external markets are the most relevant. The paper aims to develop a methodological approach to evaluation of innovative entrepreneurship development in the regions of a country. A review of existing methodological approaches to the analysis and evaluation of the development of innovation entrepreneurship in the regions of the state is outlined. The author's vision of the methodology of analysis and evaluation of the development of innovation entrepreneurship of the regions of the state is presented. The proposed methodology contains the following structural elements: the choice of the objective, object and tasks of the assessment of the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region, the choice of methods for assessing the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region, the choice of directions for assessing the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region (assessment of the stages of innovation business development in the region, assessment of forms of integration of innovation entrepreneurship, the estimation of entrepreneurial income), the choice of a system of indicators for assessing the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region, a comprehensive assessment of the level of innovation entrepreneurship in the region.
25
Tanchak, Yaryna, Nataliya Drebot, and Marta Mykolyshyn. "Support for small enterprise as a factor of the development of the national economy." Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine, no. 2(136) (2019): 73–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2019-2-13.
Full textAbstract:
The regions’ position in national competitive ability and the rankings of a country in global competitive environment is defined by innovative vector of economy development, the level of economic entities’ innovative activity, availability of fundamental and applied developments, technology transfer and integration of science and production, etc. Therefore, the issues of maintaining the development of innovative entrepreneurship in a region as an important direction of economy’s competitive ability at internal and external markets are the most relevant. The paper aims to develop a methodological approach to evaluation of innovative entrepreneurship development in the regions of a country. A review of existing methodological approaches to the analysis and evaluation of the development of innovation entrepreneurship in the regions of the state is outlined. The author's vision of the methodology of analysis and evaluation of the development of innovation entrepreneurship of the regions of the state is presented. The proposed methodology contains the following structural elements: the choice of the objective, object and tasks of the assessment of the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region, the choice of methods for assessing the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region, the choice of directions for assessing the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region (assessment of the stages of innovation business development in the region, assessment of forms of integration of innovation entrepreneurship, the estimation of entrepreneurial income), the choice of a system of indicators for assessing the development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region, a comprehensive assessment of the level of innovation entrepreneurship in the region.
26
Yin, Jian, Jing Yang, Danwen Qiao, Yiru Suo, and Zhaoyu Lv. "Difficulties and Countermeasures of College Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Under the Background of “Internet plus”." Learning & Education 9, no. 2 (November 10, 2020): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v9i2.1409.
Full textAbstract:
Appropriate innovation and entrepreneurship education in Colleges and universities can effectively promote the reform of teaching mode and improve the quality of personnel training. With the emergence of “Internet plus”, it is inevitable to combine Internet and innovative education organically. Based on the existing literature and field research in some universities, this paper points out the predicament of the innovation and entrepreneurship education of College Students under the background of “Internet plus”, expounds the function and significance of innovation and entrepreneurship education for university graduates, and
puts forward some innovative suggestions for the construction of university innovation and Entrepreneurship education system and the cultivation of students’ innovative ability.
27
Dahlstrand, Asa Lindholm, and Lois Stevenson. "Innovative entrepreneurship policy: linking innovation and entrepreneurship in a European context." Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship 1, no. 1 (January 2010): 5602. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/aie.v1i1.5845.
Full text
28
Liliani, Liliani, and Helena Sidharta. "PROSES ADOPSI INOVASI DALAM PROSES BELAJAR ENTREPRENEURSHIP." Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Manajemen 17, no. 2 (January 25, 2018): 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.17970/jrem.17.170203.id.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Entrepreneurship has a relationship with innovation, because an entrepreneur should have the future vision, a innovative thinking and could know the opportunities and create the values. One of the efforts to develop entrepreneurship more intensively is through a formal education. The study will discuss the process of innovation’s adoption in learning process of entrepreneurship in the formal education. The process of innovation’s adoption is a process to create an individual or organization change to improve the performance effectiveness. The study used case study on the students of the program of international studies management in Ciputra University. The technique of data collection used an observation, interview, and documentation. Testing of data credibility used sources and technique triangulation. Data analysis is interactively performed continually until completed so the data saturated. The research result shown that in the process of an innovation adoption a student started to launch many ideas openly, filtering the ideas based on a challenge and bottleneck probably faced, receiving an input of the other parties to complete their innovation and want to continually innovation. The research shown that the internal factor as an awareness to take a risk and external factor as a market network will influence their decisions. The factors of facilitator and target also influence or contribute in direction of the innovation adoption of students.
29
YONG, GRACE LI ANN, and KONG WENG HO. "INNOVATION, IMITATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP." Singapore Economic Review 51, no. 02 (August 2006): 147–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0217590806002378.
Full textAbstract:
This paper analyzes the gradual shift in the technological paradigm of an economy as it approaches the world technology frontier. The model developed in this paper consists of firms which employ skilled workers as an important input in technological advancement, but the novel feature here is the entrepreneur, who is the brain of technological progress. The entrepreneur has to decide to undertake either imitative or innovative activities, of which decision both affects and is affected by the country's distance to frontier. Specifically, the entrepreneur needs to have a minimum ability threshold level in order to carry out innovation. This endogenous threshold level falls as the economy moves closer to the technological frontier, enabling more entrepreneurs to be engaged in an innovation-based strategy, and consequently, moving the economy from a technological structure that is based on imitation of foreign technologies to one where domestic innovation dominates. The transitional dynamics of the model shows that there exists a steady state distance from the world frontier that countries will eventually converge to. We also find that it is possible for countries under certain conditions, to be trapped in a regime carrying out only imitation of world technologies.
30
Zabashta, Eugeniy. "THEORETICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF FORMATION OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP." Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 5, no. 4 (October 29, 2019): 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-97-104.
Full textAbstract:
The article studies and analyses the theoretical fundamentals of the formation of the mechanism of the innovative development of entrepreneurship. Today, the global economy is gradually globalizing. No country in the world can avoid its influence on certain spheres of public life. The process of “globalization” affects the development of innovative entrepreneurship. Today, the driving force of the functioning of innovative entrepreneurship in ensuring economic growth is its development and it is one of the main preconditions for the successful functioning of entrepreneurship in various spheres of the economy, an incentive for increasing the efficiency of production. Innovative entrepreneurship is a special innovative process of creating a new, a kind of management, aimed at finding new ideas and opportunities for the commercial use of innovations. Investment and sufficient funding are required for the development of innovative entrepreneurship. It is investigated that the formation of innovative development of entrepreneurship is constantly based on the search for new methods, the general scheme of formation, and the model of innovative development, is based on innovations, new technologies, which involves expanding the boundaries of innovation activity. Innovative entrepreneurship is a process of creating something new, a management process, based on finding new opportunities, an orientation towards innovation. This is associated with the willingness of the entrepreneur to assume the risk of project implementation or improvement of the existing, as well as economic, financial, moral, and social responsibility. Therefore, innovative entrepreneurship is defined as an economic process that leads to the creation of goods (products, services) and technologies, which are best by their properties, through the practical use of innovations. It is analysed that reformation of the economy is a prerequisite that will lead to increasing competitiveness and provide for the renewal of organizational structures in accordance with the best world trends of innovation activity, taking into account the peculiarities of market transformations in the country, and proposes effective measures to improve the efficiency of innovative entrepreneurship development. The level of development of innovative entrepreneurship determines the country’s place in the global space. The low technical level of many sectors of the economy in comparison with industrialized countries (EU, USA) can be overcome only due to the updating of the production base of most enterprises of the country. The development of innovative entrepreneurship in the EU and the USA has become quite successful thanks to individual initiative, creating conditions for the fulfilment of the individual interests of the entrepreneur. Ensuring material wealth, finding appropriate forms of self-expression should represent strong incentives for highly effective work. Therefore, innovative entrepreneurship is considered as the most important tool for the development and transformation of the economic system in terms of modern scientific and technological progress (STP). The use of new types of techniques, management methods, technologies, and organization of production will significantly expand the range, quality, and volume of production, and this will lead to the transformation and reform of the country’s economy. The purpose of the study. The main purpose of the paper is to substantiate and deepen the theoretical and methodological provisions regarding the formation of innovative development of entrepreneurship. The object of the study is the processes that form the innovative development of entrepreneurship. The subject-matter of the research is a set of theoretical fundamentals for improving the formation of innovative development of entrepreneurship. Research methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study was the modern theories of enterprise management, monographs, publications, and scientific and analytical developments of scientists on the issues of formation of innovative development of entrepreneurship, as well as abstract-logical and graphical methods of research.
31
Syaifudin, Arif. "The Impact of Creativity and Innovation on Increasing Micro Enterprise Income PKL Gading Fajar Sidoarjo." IJEBD (International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Business Development) 1, no. 1 (September 1, 2017): 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.29138/ijebd.v1i1.349.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this research first to identify and analyze variables influence creativity and innovation simultaneously towards entrepreneurship. Second, to identify and analyze variables influence creativity partially towards entrepreneurship. Third, to identify and analyze the partial effect of the innovation variables on entrepreneurship. Fourth, to identify and analyze the dominant influence between creativity and innovation of entrepreneurship..
Design/methodology/approach : This type of research is exploratory. Types of data used are data collected by primary and save a list of questions.
Findings : The results are as follows: first, variables influence creativity and innovation simultaneously towards entrepreneurship. Second, creativity variables partially influence on entrepreneurship. Third, innovation variables partially influence on entrepreneurship. Fourth, innovation variables have the most impact on entrepreneurship.
Research limitations/implications : Location of the research done on small welding shop in the district of Sidoarjo.
Practical implications : The essence of entrepreneurship is the ability to create something new and different through creative thinking and innovative action to create opportunities.
Originality/value : The role of SMEs can be said to be very important in the national economy. The role is mainly in the aspects such as increased employment opportunities, equity, income, rural economic development, and increase non-oil exports. Entrepreneurship is the ability to be creative and innovative basic, tips, and resources to look for opportunities to success.
32
Pei, Hongyan. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education and Teaching Based on “Internet+” Research and Exploratio." Advances in Higher Education 3, no. 2 (October 10, 2019): 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/ahe.v3i2.1425.
Full textAbstract:
<p>In order to promote mass entrepreneurship and innovation, the General Office of the State Council issued the implementation opinions on deepening innovation and entrepreneurship education reform in institutions of higher learning. According to the guidelines for innovation and entrepreneurship proposed by the State Council, colleges and universities should combine the entrepreneurial needs of students and the innovative needs of the society, set up educational goals around the orientation of running a school, and carry out educational reform activities with innovation and entrepreneurship as the theme. Based on the overall social background of "Interne+" and distinct characteristics of the times, this paper analyzes the problems existing in innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities, and explores effective strategies for implementing innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities.</p>
33
Poblete, Carlos. "Growth expectations through innovative entrepreneurship." International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 24, no. 1 (January 8, 2018): 191–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-03-2017-0083.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a model suggesting that innovation may act as a motivating force that increases entrepreneurs’ growth expectations, in which entrepreneurs’ growth expectations are shaped by their subjective values and entrepreneurial experience moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach This paper conducts statistical analysis on a sample of 11,579 entrepreneurs from 24 countries who participated in the IIIP survey of innovation in 2011 under the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor project. Findings The results suggest that entrepreneurs involved in innovative entrepreneurship are more likely to have higher growth expectations, with subjective values playing a direct and indirect role in entrepreneurs’ expectations of firm growth. Additionally, the results indicate that the duration of entrepreneurial experience moderates the relationship between strategic orientation and confidence in innovation. This finding suggests there is feedback between having beliefs about the benefits of innovation and being an innovative entrepreneur, resulting in an over-estimation – at least in comparative terms – regarding firm growth rates. This relationship is stronger for novice entrepreneurs since experienced entrepreneurs tend to be more cautious about their expectations of growing. Originality/value This study deepens our understanding of the complex processes through which organizational-level decisions ultimately influence individual-level factors. The present findings contribute to progress in this task by suggesting that strategies aimed at cultivating innovation feed entrepreneurs’ subjective values of innovation as well as expectations of growth. Although the duration of entrepreneurial experience moderates the relationship between acting as an innovative entrepreneur and subjective values of innovation, the results suggest that entrepreneurs’ expectations are primarily driven by their internal perceptions of reality.
34
Gnatchenko, Y., S. Yurieva, and N. Volgina. "INNOVATIVE ENTERPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT ON MACRO LEVEL." Series: Economic science 2, no. 162 (March 26, 2021): 92–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2021-2-162-92-98.
Full textAbstract:
Government policy issues and approaches of improvement innovative entrepreneurship are considered in the paper. Elements of policy intervention on innovative entrepreneurship were described. The way firm innovate and the nature of their contributions to innovation varies and depends critically on firm characteristics and the conditions they face to engage in innovation. The “technology push” and “market pull” models provide two perspectives on firm innovation. Innovation output may differ along the several dimensions, including the type of innovation and the impact of innovation. Innovation can play a critical role in addressing socio-economic objectives, which are affected by the following factors: economic growth and employment, environmental challenges, social challenges. Innovative entrepreneurship can contribute to socio-economic challenges by formalizing the informal sector. The main policy approaches to address challenges associated to policy intervention for innovative entrepreneurship deal with: institutional governance, strategy and coherence of policies, policy-making contexts for innovative entrepreneurship. Achieving coherence and balance in the set of policies affecting innovative entrepreneurship, and coordinating the various actors involved in these policies have, consequently, become increasingly important for policy efficiency. Specific rationales for public policies: access to finance, access to knowledge, access to labor, entrepreneurial capabilities and culture, market development and access, regulatory framework. Access to finance is a key driver in the creation, survival and growth of innovative new ventures. Within the context of innovative entrepreneurship, public policy can in the following ways: debt financing, venture capital, business angels, private sources of funding. Access to debt financing is a critical issue for innovative businesses. It allows them to finance their growth, meet working capital requirements and invest in innovation. Relevant to innovative entrepreneurs are alternative types of loans, such as convertible and subordinated loans. Convertible loans give lenders the right to convert credit into an equity participation in the company, whereas subordinated loans are junior forms of debt that, in case of insolvency, have lower priority than senior debt (e.g. asset-based lending). They are riskier but pay higher interest rates.
35
TIDD, JOE. "CONJOINT INNOVATION: BUILDING A BRIDGE BETWEEN INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP." International Journal of Innovation Management 18, no. 01 (February 2014): 1450001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919614500017.
Full textAbstract:
Research on innovation has focussed on management structures, processes and tools, whereas research on entrepreneurship and creativity has been more interested in individual personal traits. However, many of the most successful innovative firms and technologies were co-created, by multiple founders. Moreover, these founders typically have different but complementary capabilities, and we argue that it is this interaction of talent that is at the core of many innovative new ventures, what we refer to as Conjoint Innovation. We examine 15 case studies, historical and contemporary, to demonstrate the prevalence and utility of the concept of Conjoint Innovation. We identify three generative mechanisms in such interactions: complementary capabilities; contrasting cognitive and creative styles; and adjacent networks. Whilst multiple founders are a defining condition for Conjoint Innovation, all three generative mechanisms appear to be necessary for constructive interaction and innovation.
36
Paderin, I., and Y. Horiashchenko. "Strategic Priorities for Innovative Development of Entrepreneurship." Economic Herald of the Donbas, no. 1 (63) (2021): 103–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2021-1(63)-103-107.
Full textAbstract:
The article provides a critical review of the achievement of the target indicators of the Strategy for the Development of the Sphere of Innovation and other government programs. The advantages and importance of strategic innovative development of entrepreneurship for society and the state are determined. The exclusive role of planning in the management system for innovative development is emphasized. The existing contradictions between the general directions and methods of solving the problems of innovative development (financing of R&D, development of education, etc.) are emphasized. The matrix of application of technical innovations in the areas of development B2, C2, G2 is presented. The timeline projects of the Ministry of Digital Transformation, the Ministry of Education, the National Bank of Ukraine and other state bodies regulating innovative development in the country are assessed. The importance of strengthening the control function in managing the innovative development of entrepreneurship has been proven, in particular, strengthening the responsibility of government bodies in priority areas: entrepreneurship, science, technology, innovation, space industry, education. It is proposed to create a coordinating body capable of developing and monitoring the implementation of a unified strategy for innovative development with the participation of all ministries and departments in the context of real Ukrainian economic opportunities, comparable to financial and technological ones.
37
Duarte Alonso, Abel, Seng Kiat Kok, Seamus O'Brien, and Michelle O'Shea. "The significance of grassroots and inclusive innovation in harnessing social entrepreneurship and urban regeneration." European Business Review 32, no. 4 (May 11, 2020): 667–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ebr-05-2019-0102.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the dimensions of inclusive and grassroots innovations operationalised by a social enterprise and the impact of these activities on urban regeneration. To this end, the case of Homebaked in Liverpool, UK, is presented and discussed. Design/methodology/approach Face-to-face interviews with members of Homebaked’s management, staff and volunteers were conducted; the interviews were complemented with on-site observations and review of archival information of the social enterprise. Findings The data gathered revealed the organisation’s involvement in both types of innovation as a means to achieve long-term urban regeneration related goals. For instance, innovative, strategic and human dimensions, together with the human dimension emerged as key ways of innovating. The impacts of innovative practices comprised encouraging inclusiveness among residents and non-residents, with approaches including hands-on training workshops, job and volunteering opportunities being predominant. Originality/value First, the study advances the theoretical and applied understanding of grassroots and inclusive innovation in the context of a social enterprise. For instance, an innovative/strategic and human dimension emerged as predominant ways in which grassroots and inclusive innovation elements were manifested. These dimensions were based on technology uptake, implementation of new product/service concepts or harnessing the skills of local and non-local individuals. Similarly, four dimensions associated with the impacts of these types of innovation were revealed. Second, the study addresses acknowledged gaps in the literature, particularly regarding the limited contributions illuminating processes and determinants of innovation among social enterprises.
38
Hechavarría, Diana M., and Chris Welter. "Opportunity Types, Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation." International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 16, no. 4 (November 2015): 237–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2015.0196.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether there are differences in the degree of innovation as moderated by the type of opportunity pursued – found or formed – among social and non-social start-ups. The authors aim to further the discussion on opportunity types by drawing on an expansive data set, the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics I and II, to test the notion of opportunity types and their implications for innovation among social entrepreneurs. The findings suggest that social ventures are, on average, considerably more innovative than other kinds of start-ups. Furthermore, the authors find evidence which suggests that social entrepreneurs pursuing formed opportunities are less likely to be innovative.
39
DE WAAL, Gerrit Anton, and Alex MARITZ. "Analyzing for Effective Entrepreneurship Strategy: A Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation Course." Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala 64 (March 6, 2019): 57–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.33788/rcis.64.5.
Full textAbstract:
As they grow, companies that were once characterised as agile, innovative and entrepreneurial, tend to become bureaucratic and slow to respond to changes in their environments. In order to stay competitive and build competitive advantage, managers realise that they have to rejuvenate the entrepreneurial spirit and innovate on a sustainable basis, yet this remains a significant challenge for them. Our corporate entrepreneurship and innovation course for post-graduate studentscultivates and understanding of entrepreneurship and innovation in the context of established business. Its unique design, which follows a logical progression of data collection in real-life participating organizations through secondary and primary research, assures in-depth understanding of the factors that shape the current organizational profiles. Students, working in teams, draw on this data and entrepreneurship and innovation theory to develop practical corporate entrepreneurship development plans which they present to their ‘clients’. These plans reflect leadership orientation represented by entrepreneurial visions and strategies, as well as contextualised factors for control in the form of innovation processes and tools. Finally, teams recommend a range of tactics that foster supportive environments for entrepreneurship and innovation. In the process of doing so, students are themselves transformed from being traditional managers to becoming entrepreneurial managers.
40
Vekilov, K. S. O. "STRATEGIC ROLE OF THE INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY OF AZERBAIJAN." Scientific Review: Theory and Practice 10, no. 10 (October 30, 2020): 2222–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.35679/2226-0226-2020-10-10-2222-2232.
Full textAbstract:
Basing on the strategic approaches, the article investigates the role of innovative entrepreneurship in forming the knowledge economy. The importance of intensifying the development of the knowledge economy in the context of global changes and modern challenges has been substantiated. The need for the formation and development of the country’s knowledge economy, taking into account the deepening development of innovative entrepreneurship, is considered. The expediency of accelerating the commercialization of the results and discoveries of scientific research works is noted. Strategic directions of mutual activities of universities, research institutions, investment funds, industrial enterprises and other subjects of innovative entrepreneurship are given. The necessity of ensuring the effective and efficient application of the results, developments and innovations is substantiated. The progressive world experience in ensuring the development of the national innovation system and the formation of an innovationoriented economy of the country is considered. An objective approach is considered the creation and commissioning of modern technological parks, industrial parks and high-tech parks for an intensive transition to innovative development of the economy and deepening the basic principles of the knowledge economy. The essence and effectiveness of innovative entrepreneurship is revealed, which covers intellectual resources, more productive inventions and discoveries. The importance of developing the market for research services and thereby ensuring the dynamism of the market for science, technology and innovation was noted. The processes and approaches to the development of important elements of the knowledge economy and to strengthening the role of innovative entrepreneurship in this direction are analyzed. The multiplicative effect of targeted measures and the use of state support mechanisms for deepening the development of innovative entrepreneurship in Azerbaijan were assessed. The need to improve and develop organizational and economic factors, the institutional framework for accelerating the creation of an innovation system and multifunctional innovation zones in the country is considered. The role of digitalization and the use of elements of information and communication technologies for strengthening the processes of creating a knowledge economy is shown. Recommendations and proposals were prepared on the strategic role of innovative entrepreneurship in the formation of the knowledge economy in Azerbaijan.
41
Teresa Matriano, Maria, and M. Firdouse Rahman Khan. "CUSTOMER-CENTRIC INNOVATION: CASE OF OMAN ENTREPRENEURSHIP." International Journal of Management, Innovation & Entrepreneurial Research 5, no. 1 (November 20, 2019): 33–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.18510/ijmier.2019.515.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose: The objective of the study is to explore the concept of customer-centricity in Oman and to analyze the challenges of implementing customer-centric innovations, and the strategies in building momentum for the customer-centricity.
Design/methodology/approach: For carrying out the research study, the concept of customer-centric innovation and the current practices by selected top companies of Oman were considered.
Findings: The finding of the empirical study reveals that the organizations in Oman are finding the way to transition from its existing customer-centric approach to a more innovative and technology aligned strategy, keeping the core strategies in place that are focused on operational issues.
Practical Implications: Only a few notable organizations in the country are very open about their initiative to improve customer interaction. It is apparent that organizations in the country are still yet to realize the importance of building core strategies that put customers in the middle. Companies in Oman can drive growth by means of business process improvement that will attract more customers and building stronger business-customer relationships.
Social Implications: There are several ways in which innovation can be integrated into customer-centricity. The technologies available today provide the best tools for improving customer interaction.
Originality/value: No study has investigated before the customer-centric innovation in Oman, and this study will help the organizations especially Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to plan their strategies accordingly.
42
Honcharenko, Iryna, Alina Bohoslavsка, and Larysa Fedoryshyna. "Organizational and economic potential of innovative entrepreneurship in the strategic development of the Ukrainian regional economy." INNOVATIVE ECONOMY, no. 1-2 (2021): 5–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2021.1-2.1.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to present the organizational and economic potential of innovative entrepreneurship in the strategic development of the regional economy. Methodology of the research. The following research methods are used to achieve such purpose: theoretical synthesis, analysis, abstract and logical - to reveal the relationship of entrepreneurship, innovation and strategic development of regions in the context of achieving sustainable development goals; interpretation and comparison - to determine the prospects for increasing the innovative activity of enterprises in the region; tabular and graphical - for a visual presentation of Ukraine's ranking of GII, the dynamics of training highly qualified scientific personnel and the cost of research and development. Findings. It has been established that dreams about the transition of Ukraine from a low-tech resource to a high-tech innovative economy are pinned on innovative entrepreneurship, which ensures qualitative structural changes in the economy in favour of knowledge-intensive types of economic activity. It is substantiated that, unfortunately, Ukraine is inferior to neighbouring states in terms of innovative indicators, taking 30th place among 39 European countries. There is a growing gap between the national economy and European countries. The main indicators of the innovative potential of the regions, which correspond to the trends, of the rating of Ukraine according to the global index of innovations are analysed. The expediency of the formation and development of entrepreneurial regional innovation systems has been determined. Originality. The substantiation of the feasibility of the development of entrepreneurial regional innovation systems, the feature of which is mobility and the ability to quickly and adequately respond to changes in external conditions of functioning, was further developed. Practical value. Proposals substantiated in the research can be used by authorities, educational institutions and business structures for the development of regional innovation systems. Key words: potential, innovation, entrepreneurship, competition, strategy, regions.
43
Franco, Mário. "Entrepreneurship, Competitiveness and Innovation." Sustainability 12, no. 16 (August 14, 2020): 6576. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12166576.
Full textAbstract:
This Special Issue, “Entrepreneurship, Competitiveness and Innovation”, comprises a selection of papers addressing approaches and tools to understand how entrepreneurship and innovation can be good vehicles for competitiveness. These studies address the multifaceted topics surrounding entrepreneurship, such as exploratory and exploitative innovation performance, inter-enterprise knowledge, clusters, entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, sustainable growth, etc. These topics include the definitions of the concepts of entrepreneurship, innovation, and competitiveness, as well as the identification of factors affecting these types of phenomena. Perspectives guiding the design of entrepreneurship and innovation are presented to be considered when implementing public policies for increasing economic growth and competitiveness. Papers use some support theories to explain the topics studied here, such as cluster theory, resources-based theory, social theory and institutional theory, among others. Thus, in general, this Special Issue is devoted to the study of the benefits of entrepreneurship, innovation practices, and competitiveness in various countries and regions worldwide, but mainly in China. Therefore, this Special Issue is of particular value for both academic research and the context of business.
44
Gersbach, Hans, Ulrich Schetter, and Maik T. Schneider. "Taxation, Innovation and Entrepreneurship." Economic Journal 129, no. 620 (July 11, 2018): 1731–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12588.
Full text
45
Herson, Jay. "Employment, Entrepreneurship, Innovation: 2030." World Futures Review 4, no. 2 (May 2012): 162–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/194675671200400220.
Full text
46
Dalmarco, Gustavo, and Thaís Russomano. "Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Aviation." Aviation in Focus - Journal of Aeronautical Sciences 7, no. 2 (January 27, 2017): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/2179-703x.2016.2.25973.
Full text
47
Harhoff, Dietmar. "Innovation, Entrepreneurship und Demographie." Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 9 (May 2008): 46–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2516.2008.00274.x.
Full text
48
Dey, Ajoy K. "Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability." South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases 7, no. 2 (August 27, 2018): vii—viii. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2277977918783284.
Full text
49
O'Regan, Nicholas. "Entrepreneurship and innovation: Overview." Strategic Change 21, no. 5-6 (August 2012): 193–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1903.
Full text
50
Lounsbury, Michael, Joep Cornelissen, Nina Granqvist, and Stine Grodal. "Culture, innovation and entrepreneurship." Innovation 21, no. 1 (October 29, 2018): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1537716.
Full text