Academic literature on the topic 'Epigentic control'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Epigentic control.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Epigentic control"
Davies, P. C. W. "The epigenome and top-down causation." Interface Focus 2, no. 1 (September 14, 2011): 42–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0070.
Full textRamos, Kristie N., Irma N. Ramos, Yi Zeng, and Kenneth S. Ramos. "Genetics and epigenetics of pediatric leukemia in the era of precision medicine." F1000Research 7 (July 18, 2018): 1104. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14634.1.
Full textKrämer, Anne I., and Christoph Handschin. "How Epigenetic Modifications Drive the Expression and Mediate the Action of PGC-1α in the Regulation of Metabolism." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 21 (October 31, 2019): 5449. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215449.
Full textDeng, Xian, Xianwei Song, Liya Wei, Chunyan Liu, and Xiaofeng Cao. "Epigenetic regulation and epigenomic landscape in rice." National Science Review 3, no. 3 (September 1, 2016): 309–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww042.
Full textMcCaw, Beth A., Tyler J. Stevenson, and Lesley T. Lancaster. "Epigenetic Responses to Temperature and Climate." Integrative and Comparative Biology 60, no. 6 (May 29, 2020): 1469–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa049.
Full textHowlett, Kirsten F., and Sean L. McGee. "Epigenetic regulation of skeletal muscle metabolism." Clinical Science 130, no. 13 (May 23, 2016): 1051–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/cs20160115.
Full textVenkatesh, Ishwariya, and Khadijah Makky. "Teaching Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression Is Critical in 21st-Century Science Education: Key Concepts & Teaching Strategies." American Biology Teacher 82, no. 6 (August 1, 2020): 372–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.6.372.
Full textVerdikt, Roxane, and Patrick Allard. "Metabolo-epigenetics: the interplay of metabolism and epigenetics during early germ cells development†." Biology of Reproduction 105, no. 3 (June 16, 2021): 616–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioab118.
Full textBellmunt, Joaquim, Guangwu Guo, Stephanie A. Mullane, Anna Orsola, Lillian Werner, Paul Van Hummelen, Aaron Thorner, et al. "Genomic landscape of high-grade T1 micropapillary bladder tumors." Journal of Clinical Oncology 33, no. 7_suppl (March 1, 2015): 299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.299.
Full textZaidi, Sayyed K., Daniel W. Young, Martin Montecino, Jane B. Lian, Janet L. Stein, Andre J. van Wijnen, and Gary S. Stein. "Architectural Epigenetics: Mitotic Retention of Mammalian Transcriptional Regulatory Information." Molecular and Cellular Biology 30, no. 20 (August 9, 2010): 4758–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.00646-10.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Epigentic control"
Lezcano, Magda. "The Control of the Epigenome." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala universitet, Zoologisk utvecklingsbiologi, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7190.
Full textSima, Teruel Núria. "Paper de SirT2 en el control epigenètic de la mitosi." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/386527.
Full textChromatin is a dynamical structure hierarchically organized to fit inside the nucleus. The structure, organization and function of chromatin are tightly controlled throughout the cell cycle by different epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation and histone modifications. The histone post-translational modifications occur mainly in their N-terminal tail, and give rise to changes in the charge and function of the protein. Among the different histone modifications, lysine acetylation (K) is one of the best characterized. Acetylation of lysine 16 of histone H4 is the most frequently acetylated residue in eukaryotes and is a key regulator of high orders of chromatin structure. Thus, the deacetylated state of this residue is associated with heterochromatic and transcriptional inactive regions, whereas the acetylated form is found in euchromatic and transcriptional active regions. The dynamics of this histone mark is mainly governed by the acetyltransferase MOF and the NAD±-dependent deacetylases SirT1 and SirT2, which makes both groups of enzymes essential for the regulation of the gene expression and the control of chromatin organization. MOF is crucial in embryogenesis, DNA repair and the cell cycle progression. In fact, loss of MOF has been shown to induce cell cycle arrest during G2/M transition, increased chromosomal aberrations and genome instability. SirT 1 and SirT2 belong to Class III of histone deacetylases (HDACs), commonly referred as sirtuins. They play a key role in stress response, and in particular in protecting genome integrity. Among the seven mammalian sirtuins (SirT1-7), only SirT2 and to a lesser extend SirT1, have been linked with cell cycle regulation. In particular, SirT2, which mainly localizes to the cytoplasm during most of the cell cycle, shuttles to the nucleus in G2/M transition, where deacetylates H4K16Ac driving, among other things, H4K2Omel deposition by the histone methyltransferase PR-SETT. The control of H4K2Omel deposition determines the levels of H4K2Ome2,3 in the next cell cycle, which links SirT2 to the regulation of DNA replication and repair, as well as heterochromatin formation. Work from our group and others have shown that SirT2 plays a role in the control of mitosis progression. In particular, SirT2 is required for the cell cycle arrest in the G2/M checkpoint during stress response, process that has been related to SirT2-dependent regulation of H4K2Omel. However, the mechanisms behind the cell cycle arrest are still undefined. In the present work we aimed to elucidate the function of SirT2 in G2/M transition and its coordination with the checkpoint regulatory machinery. Our results seem indicate that SirT2 drives the G2/M checkpoint activation through the regulation of H4K16Ac, H4K2Omel and the control of the expression of cell cycle related genes. We also describe for the first time, a complementary mechanism whereby SirT2 regulates the levels of H4K16Ac during mitosis. We observe that SirT2 not only deacetylates MOF during G2/M, suppressing its acetyltransferase activity, but also induces both chromatin eviction and degradation of MOF. This in turn, results in H4K16 hypoacetylation and subsequent monomethylation of H4K20. Additionally, we show that MOF inhibits PR-SETT chromatin localization, maintaining the appropriate levels of H4K2Omel before entering mitosis and avoiding premature chromosome condensation. Our study suggests that the crosstalk between MOF and SirT2 is directly involved in the epigenetic control of the cell cycle, contributing to the maintenance of genome stability.
Sessa, Luca. "Epigenetic control of human HOX clusters." Thesis, Open University, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.402692.
Full textDeraze, Jérôme. "Epigenetic control of ribosome biogenesis homeostasis." Thesis, Paris 6, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA066342/document.
Full textTranslation is an essential metabolic activity carried by ribosomes. These complexes are synthetized in the nucleolus, and require the coordinated expression of 4 ribosomal RNA, 80 ribosomal proteins, and more than 200 assembly factors. Indeed, their biogenesis is complex and expensive, consuming more than half of the energy in proliferating cells. As the cellular need for ribosomes varies with environmental or metabolic conditions, their synthesis is tightly regulated in response to a number of cues. Many mechanisms ensure that the intensity of ribosome biogenesis is coupled to cell homeostasis. Such is the ability of ribosomal proteins to regulate gene expression at many levels, from translation specificity to activation or repression of transcription. Many such functions are carried off the ribosome, and are thus termed extraribosomal. Our team discovered a new extraribosomal function of ribosomal protein uL11 in Drosophila. Indeed, when trimethylated on lysine 3 (uL11K3me3), it associates with Corto, a transcription factor of the Enhancers of Trithorax and Polycomb family. By studying their genome-wide binding profile on chromatin, we show that these proteins are distributed along different patterns, and that uL11K3me3 specifically binds a subset of active genes enriched in ribosome biogenesis components. Additionally, we generated the first genetic alleles for Drosophila uL11 and describe the molecular screening method that we employed. Last, we studied the uL11 alleles that delete or replace lysine 3. We describe that their Minute-like phenotypes suggest an essential role for the N-terminal domain of uL11, though it may be independent of its association with Corto
Martucci, Mariane Ferracin. "Impactos das biotécnicas reprodutivas no controle epigenético de genes imprinted." Universidade de São Paulo, 2015. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/10/10132/tde-20102015-082930/.
Full textAssisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are usually used in both human and veterinary medicine aiming the correction of heritable or acquired infertilities. The somatic cell nuclear transfer technique (SCNT) is of particular importance in veterinary as it enables the generation of genetically identical organisms, allowing the production of homogeneous genetically improved herds, and also serving as a model for reprogramming studies. However, the use of TRAs, SCNT in special, may be responsible for the increase of developmental-related abnormalities in the conceptuses. Such phenotypes are probably caused by a disruption during the epigenetic reprogramming due to the manipulation of gametes and embryos during the early development period, and therefore leading to disturbances in the epigenetic regulation of imprinted genes. The present study aimed to evaluate epigenetic marks and expression of imprinted genes in different developmental periods of cattle generated by SCNT or artificial insemination (AI). For that, corionic/alantoic and amniotic membranes from fetuses and muscular, nervous and hepatic tissues from born animals, healthy (adult) or not, produced by SCNT or AI were collected. The expression of the imprinted genes H19, IGF2, IGF2R and Airn was analyzed as well as the DNA methylation at locus H19/IGF2 in post-natal period. It was observed that IGF2 was not detected during pre-natal period, whereas H19 expression is increased when compared to IGF2R in the groups studied herein. At post-natal period the IGF2, H19 and IGF2R expression patterns infers the decrease of relative gene expression in the liver and the increase of H19 expression in the muscle of SCNT adult animals. The methylation pattern of IGF2/H19 locus, however, did not differ between healthy or not animals. The results described herein may contribute to the understanding of the epigenetic mechanisms related to embryonic and fetal development, and in special, to those related to the epigenetic dynamics during genomic imprinting
Freyer, Jennifer Sandra Silvia. "Regulation und funktionelle Rolle des murinen Transkriptionsfaktors Foxp3 in T-Zellen." Doctoral thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät I, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/15841.
Full textThe aim of the study was to analyze the function and regulation of the transcription factor Foxp3. In a first step we designed a BAC-transgenic mouse with eYFP under the control of the Foxp3 promoter. For creating these mice we use the ET- cloning method. The step of homologous recombination of the target vector into the BAC failed. Because of that, we decided to work in cooperation with the group of Tim Sparwasser from Munich and their BAC- transgenic mouse called DEREG- mouse. This mouse expresses the coding region of eGFP fused to the diphtheria- toxin- receptor under the control of the Foxp3 promoter. Therefore Foxp3+ T cells can be easily detected by eGFP expression and can even be depleted by diphtheria- toxin- application. We confirmed the co- expression of Foxp3 and eGFP and furthermore tested the functionality of the depletion- process of Foxp3+ T cells by treatment with diphtheria- toxin. In a second study, we analyzed the stability of Foxp3 expressing cells in vivo. Therefore we transferred Foxp3+ T cells in syngenic mice and analyzed these cells after 14 days for their Foxp3- expression. Furthermore, we tested the induction of Foxp3 expression through TGF-beta and the suppressive activity of these cells. We also analyzed those cells for their methylation pattern, comparing cells, which showed an induction of Foxp3- expression after one week of culture with TGF-beta to cells, which received TGF-beta for one week and were then restimulated in the absence of TGF-beta. The stability of Foxp3 expression seems to correlate with the demethylated state of the TSDR (Treg Specific Demethylated Region). To get a closer look on the region called TSDR in the murine foxp3 locus, we decided to analyze this region under different aspects. First, we checked for putative binding sites of transcription factors by database analysis of the TSDR. We also analysed histon modifications, such as acetylation of histon H3 and H4 and tri- methylation of lysine 4 at histon3, in this region. Presence of these modifications hinted an epigenetic regulation of Foxp3 involving the TSDR. In a last step, the transcriptional activity of TSDR was tested to delineate whether the TSDR serves as an alternative promoter or acts as a regulative element like an enhancer. Luciferase assays showed that TSDR is a regulative enhancer element, which loses transcriptional activity when methylated. Deletion mutants determined the most important fragment of the TSDR.
Ferreira, Mónica Alexandra dos Santos. "Epigenetic control of the male progenitor germline by the protein phosphatase PP1-NIP." Doctoral thesis, Universidade de Aveiro, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10773/22814.
Full textNIPP1, for nuclear inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), is a multifunctional scaffold protein that regulates cell signaling, pre-mRNA splicing and transcription by targeting PP1 to specific nuclear substrates. The global deletion of NIPP1 in mice is embryonic lethal at the onset of gastrulation, precluding its functional analysis in adult tissues. This prompted us to generate a tamoxifen-inducible NIPP1 knockout (iKO) mouse model. Unexpectedly, the deletion of NIPP1 was not efficient in the examined organs except for testis. The loss of NIPP1 caused an age-dependent progressive loss of testicular germ cells, culminating in a Sertoli cells-only phenotype. iKO testis showed a decreased proliferation of (un)differentiated spermatogonia and an increased level of apoptosis. Likewise, neonatal iKO testis exhibited an almost complete loss of gonocyte-derived (un)differentiated spermatogonia during the first wave of spermatogenesis. In addition, GFRA1+ progenitor cells isolated from induced iKO testis displayed a reduced proliferation potential. These data suggest that NIPP1 is required for the maintenance of undifferentiated spermatogonia. We also found that the observed phenotype was associated with the deregulation of genes that are implicated in the control of cell proliferation and survival. At the molecular level, the deletion of NIPP1 was associated with the loss of core components of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2), which affects gene expression through trimethylation of histone H3 at Lys 27. The loss of PRC2 components could be explained by the hyperphosphorylation and degradation of EZH2, the catalytic subunit of the PRC2 complex, resulting in the destabilization of other PRC2 core components. The testis phenotype of the iKOs could be phenocopied by the chemical inhibition of EZH1/2 in organotypic testis cultures. Overall, our study uncovers a key function for PP1-NIPP1 in the regulation of EZH2 phosphorylation and stability, which is essential for the maintenance of germ cells.
NIPP1, inhibidor nuclear da protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), é uma proteina multifuncional que regula a sinalização celular, splicing do pre-mRNA e transcrição mediante o direcionamento da PP1 para substratos nucleares específicos. A deleção global da NIPP1 é letal durante o desenvolvimento embrionário no início da gastrulação, impedindo assim a sua análise funcional em tecidos de adultos. Este facto incitou-nos a gerar um modelo de ratinho knockout induzível (iKO) para a NIPP1. Inesperadamente, a remoção da NIPP1 não foi eficiente na maioria dos órgãos analisados, com exceção do testículo. A deleção da NIPP1 causou uma perda progressiva de células germinativas do testículo dependente da idade, culminando num fenótipo denominado Sertoli cells-only phenotype. O testículo adulto nos ratinhos iKO apresentaram uma diminuição na proliferação das espermatogónias (in)diferenciadas e aumento dos níveis de apoptose. De modo análogo, o testículo dos neonatos exibiu uma perda quase completa das espermatogónias (in)diferenciadas derivadas de gonócitos, durante o primeiro ciclo de espermatogénese. Adicionalmente, culturas celulares enriquecidas em células progenitoras GFRA1+ isoladas do testículo dos ratinhos iKO apresentaram uma diminuição do seu potencial proliferativo. Estes resultados sugerem que a NIPP1 é necessária para a manutenção das espermatogónias indiferenciadas. Demonstrámos também que fenótipo observado está associado à desregulação de genes implicados no controlo da proliferação e viabilidade celular. No que concerne o mecanismo molecular, a deleção da NIPP1 resultou na perda dos componentes centrais do complexo PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2), o que afetou a expressão genética através da trimetilação da histone H3 no resíduo Lys27 (H3K27me3). A perda dos componentes integrantes do complexo PRC2 foi explanada pela hiperfosforilação e degradação da proteína EZH2, o componente catalítico central do complexo PRC2, resultando na subsequente destabilização de outros componentes deste complexo. Em conformidade, o fenótipo foi reproduzido através da inibição química da proteína EZH1/2 em culturas organotípicas de testículos. De modo geral, este estudo revela a importância da fosfatase PP1-NIPP1 para a regulação da fosforilação e estabilização da proteína EZH2, essencial para a manutenção das células germinativas.
Hitchcock, Robert Arthur. "Epigenetic control of the kinetoplastid spliced leader RNA." Diss., Restricted to subscribing institutions, 2009. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1998392041&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=1564&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Full textHerranz, Martín Nicolás. "New insights in the epigenetic control of EMT." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/80660.
Full textLa transició epiteli-‐mesènquima (EMT) és un programa cel·lular molt conservat que permet a les cèl·lules epitelials convertir-‐se en cèl·lules mesenquimals indiferenciades. La EMT és un procés crucial pel desenvolupament embrionari i per la progressió tumoral. A aquest respecte, ha esdevingut cada cop més evident que el desenvolupament tumoral no només està associat a alteracions genètiques, sinó també a l'alteració de l’expressió gènica causada per canvis epigenètics. Tenint això en compte, aquesta tesi es centra en la descripció de nous mecanismes moleculars en l’àmbit de l’epigenètica associats a un dels processos clau en la EMT, la repressió de la E-‐ cadherina mitjançada pel factor de transcripció Snail1. De fet, els nostres resultats demostren que tant les proteïnes del grup Polycomb (PcG) com la proteïna LOXL2 estan implicades en aquest procés. A part de proporcionar nova informació respecte la importància d'aquestes proteïnes en la progressió tumoral, la nostra feina ha permès la caracterització d'una nova modificació epigenètica duta a terme per la proteïna LOXL2; la deaminació de H3K4.
Goncharevich, Alexander. "Epigenetic control of Wnt signalling in CNS remyelination." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2013. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.648183.
Full textBooks on the topic "Epigentic control"
Grafi, Gideon, and Nir Ohad, eds. Epigenetic Memory and Control in Plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35227-0.
Full textMukesh, Verma, Dunn Barbara K, Umar Asad, and National Cancer Institute (U.S.). Division of Cancer Prevention., eds. Epigenetics in cancer prevention: Early detection and risk assessment. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 2003.
Find full textEpigenetic Memory And Control In Plants. Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH &, 2013.
Find full textGrafi, Gideon, and Nir Ohad. Epigenetic Memory and Control in Plants. Springer, 2013.
Find full textGrafi, Gideon, and Nir Ohad. Epigenetic Memory and Control in Plants. Springer, 2015.
Find full textWolffe, Alan P., and Fyodor Urnov. Epigenetics: Principles of Eukaryotic Genome Control. Wiley-Liss, 2008.
Find full textQiu, Xuan. Epigenetic Control of Tumor Suppressor Genes in Lung Cancer. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2012.
Find full textCabej, Nelson R. Neural Control of Development: The Epigenetic Theory of Heredity. Albanet, 2005.
Find full textCabej, Nelson R. Neural Control of Development: The Epigenetic Theory of Heredity. 2nd ed. Albanet, 2005.
Find full textYang, Jin, Pei Han, Wei Li, and Ching-Pin Chang. Epigenetics and post-transcriptional regulation of cardiovascular development. Edited by José Maria Pérez-Pomares, Robert G. Kelly, Maurice van den Hoff, José Luis de la Pompa, David Sedmera, Cristina Basso, and Deborah Henderson. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198757269.003.0032.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Epigentic control"
Helmbold, Heike, Wolfgang Deppert, and Wolfgang Bohn. "Epigenetic Control in Cellular Senescence." In Cancer Epigenetics, 25–44. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118005743.ch3.
Full textBronner, Christian, Mayada Achour, Thierry Chataigneau, and Valérie B. Schini-Kerth. "Epigenetic Control of Gene Transcription." In Cancer Epigenetics, 57–99. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118005743.ch5.
Full textLopez-Granados, Eduardo. "Epigenetic Control of Lymphocyte Differentiation." In Epigenetic Contributions in Autoimmune Disease, 26–35. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8216-2_3.
Full textvan den Elsen, Peter J., Marja C. J. A. van Eggermond, and Rutger J. Wierda. "Epigenetic Control in Immune Function." In Epigenetic Contributions in Autoimmune Disease, 36–49. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8216-2_4.
Full textRazin, Aharon, and Ruth Shemer. "Epigenetic Control of Gene Expression." In Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, 189–204. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69111-2_9.
Full textGuénet, Jean-Louis, Fernando Benavides, Jean-Jacques Panthier, and Xavier Montagutelli. "Epigenetic Control of Genome Expression." In Genetics of the Mouse, 187–220. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44287-6_6.
Full textVan Wynsberghe, Priscilla M., and Eleanor M. Maine. "Epigenetic Control of Germline Development." In Germ Cell Development in C. elegans, 373–403. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4015-4_13.
Full textSaijo, Yusuke, and Eva-Maria Reimer-Michalski. "Epigenetic Control of Plant Immunity." In Epigenetic Memory and Control in Plants, 57–76. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35227-0_4.
Full textZografou, Theo, and Franziska Turck. "Epigenetic Control of Flowering Time." In Epigenetic Memory and Control in Plants, 77–105. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35227-0_5.
Full textHouben, Andreas, Dmitri Demidov, and Raheleh Karimi-Ashtiyani. "Epigenetic Control of Cell Division." In Epigenetic Memory and Control in Plants, 155–75. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35227-0_8.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Epigentic control"
Young, Richard A. "Abstract IA01: Transcriptional and epigenetic control of oncogenes." In Abstracts: AACR Special Conference on Chromatin and Epigenetics in Cancer - June 19-22, 2013; Atlanta, GA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.cec13-ia01.
Full textZakarya, Razia, Hui Chen, Corey-Anke Brandsma, Ian M. Adcock, and Brian G. G. Oliver. "Epigenetic control of TGFβ induced fibrosis in COPD." In ERS International Congress 2017 abstracts. European Respiratory Society, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/1393003.congress-2017.pa961.
Full textBailly, David, Pierre Andry, and Philippe Gaussier. "Learning anticipatory motor control." In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/devlrn.2012.6400850.
Full textTalbott, Walter A., He Crane Huang, and Javier Movellan. "Infomax models of oculomotor control." In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/devlrn.2012.6400823.
Full textZeng, Guihua, Fu-Sen Liang, and Lina Cui. "Abstract 5234: Epigenetic control of heparanase expression through CRISPR/dCas9." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2019; March 29-April 3, 2019; Atlanta, GA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-5234.
Full textMaitland, Norman James, and John Packer. "Abstract B23: Epigenetic control of prostate epithelial stem cell differentiation." In Abstracts: AACR Special Conference on Developmental Biology and Cancer; November 30 - December 3, 2015; Boston, Massachusetts. American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1557-3125.devbiolca15-b23.
Full textLi, Qunfang, and Michael A. Tainsky. "Abstract 4002: Epigenetic control of a checkpoint for miRNA tolerance." In Proceedings: AACR 102nd Annual Meeting 2011‐‐ Apr 2‐6, 2011; Orlando, FL. American Association for Cancer Research, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-4002.
Full textKoss, Brian, Bradley D. Shields, Erin M. Taylor, Aaron J. Storey, Stephanie D. Byrum, Allen J. Gies, Charity L. Washam, et al. "Abstract 1029: Epigenetic control of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte metabolic-exhaustion." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2020; April 27-28, 2020 and June 22-24, 2020; Philadelphia, PA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-1029.
Full textZeng, Guihua, Fu-Sen Liang, and Lina Cui. "Abstract 5234: Epigenetic control of heparanase expression through CRISPR/dCas9." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2019; March 29-April 3, 2019; Atlanta, GA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-5234.
Full textChen, Zixin, Guihua Zeng, Xiaogang Li, Fu-Sen Liang, and Lina Cui. "Abstract 2112: Epigenetic control of heparanase expression using CRISPR/dCas9." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2021; April 10-15, 2021 and May 17-21, 2021; Philadelphia, PA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-2112.
Full textReports on the topic "Epigentic control"
Williams, Kristin P. Epigenetic Control of Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada581650.
Full textWilliams, Kristin P. Epigenetic Control of Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada601260.
Full textCase, Adam J., and Frederick E. Domann. Epigenetic Control of Prolyl and Asparaginyl Hydroxylases in Prostate Cancer. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada542700.
Full textCase, Adam J. Epigenetic Control of Prolyl and Asparaginyl Hydroxylases in Prostate Cancer. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada511993.
Full textFranceschi, Renny T. Epigenetic Control of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: Role of Runx2 Phosphorylation. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada580104.
Full textCase, Adam. Epigenetic Control of Prolyl and Asparaginyl Hydroxylases in Prostate Cancer. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada552430.
Full textFranceschi, Renny T. Epigenetic Control of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: Role of Runx2 Phosphorylation. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada620609.
Full textMartínez-Balbás, Marian. La epigenética controla el desarrollo del sistema nervioso (Especial Premio FBBVA 2013). Sociedad Española de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular (SEBBM), July 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.18567/sebbmdiv_rpc.2014.07.1.
Full text