Academic literature on the topic 'Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)"
1
Yerimpasheva, Aida T., Aida M. Myrzakhmetova, and Dina U. Alshimbayeva. "Conjugation of the Eurasian economic union and the belt road initiative: the role and place of Kazakhstan." R-Economy 8, no. 2 (2022): 172–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/recon.2022.8.2.014.
Full textAbstract:
Relevance. In mass media, the Silk Road Economic Belt and the Eurasian economic integration are considered as the driving forces behind Eurasia’s development. Nevertheless, the processes of Eurasian integration have been impeded by the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, 2020-22 have been marked by political turmoil in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) member states. Modelled on the European Union, the Eurasian Union increasingly resembles the former Soviet Union, which is a matter of concern for the member states. On the other hand, the growing democratic sentiments in the post-Soviet countries and the competition between Russia and China for influence in Eurasia make the cooperation of the EAEU and the Belt Road Initiative (BRI) more problematic. Research objective. The study examines the opportunities and challenges associated with the possible integration of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the Belt Road Initiative. Methods and Data. In this paper, we used an exploratory research design relying on collecting secondary and primary qualitative data. Methodologically, the study is based on the approaches of positive and nominative economics. The qualitative research in the form of in-depth interviews helped us gain insight into the economic problems of the EAEU member states. We also analyzed the dynamics of each member country’s GDP and compared it with that of China for the period from 2012 to present. Results. The compatibility of national and transnational interests in the EAEU programs is one of the main issues that have to be addressed. There have been specified areas of the EAEU’s development, many of which reveal the Russian Federation’s dominating role in managing the Union. According to the experts we have interviewed, to implement its programs, the EAEU needs significant centralization of power. On the other hand, the unresolved social, economic, and political issues can become a significant obstacle to the integration. Conclusion. Despite the widespread belief that the BRI would bring significant welfare and trade benefits to its participants, the EAEU member countries and China first need to focus on implementing political reforms, which the social and economic agenda hinges upon.
2
Ebrahimitorkaman, Ali. "EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION AND IRAN." RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Political Sciences. History. International Relations, no. 4 (2021): 47–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2021-4-47-60.
Full textAbstract:
After the collapse of the USSR, Russia lost its superpower status as well as its influence over a very large territory in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Caucasus. The Western countries, primarily the United States, took advantage of this to include these regions in the orbit of their influence. At the beginning of the 21st century, Russia has begun to regain its presence in Central Asia and the Caucasus by creating such organizations as the EAEU and the SCO. At the same time, Russia pursued the goal of returning the superpower positions lost after the collapse of the USSR. One of the important reasons for the formation of the EAEU was that some countries of the former USSR felt the need to restore economic ties that had existed before 1991. This organization soon began to expand towards the Middle East. Iran was one of the first countries in the region to start negotiations with the organization. This article presents an analysis of Iran’s relationship with the EAEU. In 2019, the Agreement on the Free Trade Zone of Iran with the EAEU entered into force, which led to a significant increase in bilateral trade. A possible entry into the EAEU for Iran, on the one hand, will not bring very large economic benefits due to the peculiarities of the structure of its economy and the need for modern technologies that this organization cannot provide for this country. However, it will allow Iran to expand and deepen its interaction with the countries of Central Asia and resist the US pressure. In particular, it will be possible for Iran to neutralize the impact of the devastating American economic sanctions by developing ties with the EAEU in the field of economy.
3
Chernykh, I. A., and R. R. Burnashev. "Integration Processes within the Eurasian Economic Union: Kazakhstan’s Narratives." Kutafin Law Review 8, no. 2 (2021): 289–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2021.2.16.289-313.
Full textAbstract:
Integration processes in the Eurasian space are ambiguously assess both by officials and an expert community of the member countries. Thus, there is still a discussion in Kazakhstan and various narratives are being formed concerning the expediency of the country’s presence in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the advantages and challenges associated with this participation. The article deals with the main narratives that are presenting in Kazakhstan and describing the integration processes within the EAEU — official and expert (both critical about the EAEU and supporting Eurasian integration). The analysis conducted in the article is based on the understanding of the narrative as a “statement-result”, defined by its structure (coherence between key concepts). The article shows that all narratives about the EAEU, present in the Kazakhstani discourse, have a similar structure, formed by the concepts of “independence”, “integration”, “politics” and “economics”. The differences between the narratives are determined by the emphasis on either the “independencepolitics” or “integration-economics” constellations (linkages), and the proposed format of regionalization of Kazakhstan within Central Asia or Eurasia.
4
Sahakyan, Mher D., and Yuntian Zheng. "China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the Eurasian Economic Union." Iran and the Caucasus 28, no. 3 (2024): 317–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573384x-02803007.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This article focuses on the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). It argues that EAEU members and China need each other to implement their two major initiatives. As a result of the conjunction of the EAEU and BRI, China and the EAEU states linked their transportation infrastructure, which provided them opportunities for modernization and growth. The EAEU member states established contacts with the second economy of the world at a multilateral level as well. The Agreement on Economic and Trade Cooperation between the Eurasian Economic Union and Its Member States, of the One Part, and the People’s Republic of China, of the other Part, signed in 2018, which came into force in 2019, provided added impetus to strengthen economic relations and created a legal platform for the further harmonization of the BRI with the EAEU. This article also argues that the conjunction of the EAEU and BRI has a political meaning as well. It means that in post-Soviet Eurasia, Russia and China have chosen cooperation over competition, as they are the main initiators of these economic and political integration initiatives. It explains that it fully coincides with the national interests of other members of the EAEU, such as Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan, as these states can cooperate with both Russia and China without choosing any side. This contribution concludes that cooperation between China and the EAEU in post-Soviet Eurasia improves security level and contributes to peaceful, cooperative development.
5
Demchenko, Elena. "Confectionery Standards in the Eurasian Economic Union." Food Processing: Techniques and Technology 52, no. 4 (2022): 819–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2022-4-2409.
Full textAbstract:
A barrier-free trade in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) market is impossible without a unified approach to standardization. The research objective was to analyze and develop proposals that would make it possible to unify the standards of the Eurasian Economic Commission (EAEC) on the content of sulfur dioxide and sulfites in confectionery products.
 The study featured technical regulations and standards for confectionery products, methods for determining sulfur dioxide, and EAEU resources on the results of control oversight activities. The methods included comparison, analogy, analysis, synthesis, peer review, integrated standardization, and system analysis.
 The analysis involved the official websites of the authorized bodies of the EAEU states on control and supervisory measures for compliance with technical regulations. It revealed the main reasons behind the limited confectionery turnover associated with excessive sulfur dioxide and sulfites. The standards showed discrepancies with Technical Regulations of Customs Union TR CU 022/2011 and TR CU 029/2012. The content standards for sulfur dioxide and sulfites in finished products were different. The analysis detected no unified approach to indicators, measurement units, and detection methods. The authors also assessed the advantages and disadvantages of the existing domestic State Standards for methods of sulfur dioxide and sulfite detection in confectionery products. The state standards have to be adapted to the international standards and EU Directives, in particular, by certifying the Monier-Williams method.
 The results can help to unify national and international regulations in order to remove technical barriers in the EAEU market and increase the export volume. They also can help confectionery producers to improve the quality and safety of confectionery products.
6
Golovina, E. E., and S. A. Velikaia. "CONJUGATION OF THE COUNTRIES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION AND CASPIAN REGION." Sovremennaya nauka i innovatsii, no. 4 (36) (2021): 173–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.37493/2307-910x.2021.4.19.
Full textAbstract:
The Eurasian Economic Union as an international organization of regional economic integration is the middle space within which the global project of the Greater Eurasian Partnership is formed. The triad of Eurasian states of the EAEU (Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan) form the basis of this Union and the integration potential of its development. The specifics of the EAEU geographical space is in conjunction with the most important international organizations of Eurasia, within the geopolitical and economic boundaries of which the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), the European Union (EU) and others are developing. A special place is occupied by the informal association of the Caspian Region states (CRS), where the geopolitical project " The Greater Caspian Region" is being formed. In the framework of this configuration possible approaches to the conjugation of the most important segments of the EEU and the Caspian region development are considered.
7
Ryabchikov, Anton A., and Evdokiya O. Eremeeva. "ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY INSTRUMENTS OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION." TODAY AND TOMORROW OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY, no. 109-110 (2022): 99–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.26653/1993-4947-2022-109-110-08.
Full textAbstract:
This article discusses the set of economic diplomacy (ED) instruments used by the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). It analyses the current EAEU mechanism of negotiating regional trade agreements (RTAs) with third countries, international organisations and integration. It outlines the main goals and priorities of the EAEU RTS network creation process. It gives an overview of the existing procedures for implementing the association’s trade remedies, as well as the substance of its export promotion measures. It is concluded that despite the comparative limitations of the ED-tools of the EAEU at the current stage, the integration group can still be characterized as an actor in this area. The potential for expanding the subject field of EAEU’s international trade agreements, as well as for supplementing the existing set of measures of supranational export support for member countries, has been identified.
8
Danilovna Kovaleva, Valentina, Mikhail Gennadevich Rusetskiy, Zhanna Alexandrovna Shadrina, Gayane Agopovna Kochyan, and Larisa Stanislavovna Zarovnaya. "Current Issues of Economic Security of the Eurasian Economic Union." International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, no. 3.14 (2018): 343. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.14.17023.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers the main aspects that characterize the economic security system of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and means to ensure economic security that contribute to increasing economic potential and to creating conditions for the effective development of integration processes. The authors investigated the main documents of the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC), a constantly acting regulating body of the EAEU, and developed recommendations for creating unified strategies of the economic security of the Eurasian Economic Union that can be implemented in the system of risk management that, in turn, is based on the controlling toolkit. In the process of the research it was determined that the political aspect alone is not enough for the preservation and effective development of the Eurasian Economic Union as common economic interests and possible effects from their implementation are the crucial components of viability of any integration union including the EAEU country members. In this regard the formation of the system of economic security of the integration union of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan is a relevant issue. In order to contribute to the integration of the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union that is based on the geopolitical aspect it is necessary to ensure economic security which determines both the theoretical and practical significance of the study. At the same time such integration would promote the unification of the EAEU countries that are different in the level of their socio-economic development.
9
Petrov, Roman, and Paul Kalinichenko. "On Similarities and Differences of the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union Legal Orders: Is There the Eurasian Economic Union Acquis?" Legal Issues of Economic Integration 43, Issue 3 (2016): 295–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/leie2016014.
Full textAbstract:
This contribution is devoted to the study of legal order of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). It is done through the analysis of similarities and differences of the EAEU legal order with those of the European Union (EU). It is argued that the notion ‘EU acquis’ has been extended beyond the EU and has been exported to legal orders of other international organizations. It poses the question whether the notion ‘acquis’ can have the same meaning within the legal order of the EAEU. On the one hand, some institutional similarities between the EAEU and the EU as well as the dynamic nature of the EAEU legal order give us a ground to apply the notion ‘acquis’ with regard to the EAEU in order to describe the political and legal heritage of the integration projects within the post- Soviet area. On the other hand, considerable differences between the EU and the EAEU legal systems (different degrees of supranationality, weak role of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union, and strictly normative understanding of the definition of the ‘Union Law’ in the EAEU Treaty) bring into question the relevance of the notion of the ‘EAEU acquis’. Analysis of the notion ‘EAEU acquis’ encourages a discussion about the necessity to revisit its narrow scope towards inclusion of fundamental concepts of common values, founding principles like rule of law and non-discrimination and direct effect.
10
Mikhnevich, S. V., and M. A. Aksenov. "Eurasian Business in Developing Eurasian Economic Integration." EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics 18, no. 1 (2024): 140–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2024-01-140-152.
Full textAbstract:
Aim. The study of the involvement of the business community in the development of Eurasian integration through the reflection of their priorities in the decisions and activities of supranational bodies.Tasks. To analyze the problems of reflecting the interests of the business community in Eurasian integration; to consider the related practical interaction of business with supranational bodies on the example of the activities of the EAEU Business Council; to identify areas of development of integration processes within the EAEU that are promising from the point of view of the business community.Methods. The research uses general scientific and special methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis, as well as the author’s methodology for assessing business involvement in integration processes has been developed and applied.Results. The conducted analysis of valid strategic documents of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and its supranational bodies using the authors’ technique confirms the considerable and growing role of business in Eurasian economic integration.Conclusions. Trade and investment cooperation under the EAEU demonstrates positive dynamics despite growing international uncertainty and tensions. It is in many ways connected with the proactive stance of Eurasian business, which demonstrates substantial and rising interest towards Eurasian economic integration.The Eurasian supranational bodies pay serious and growing consideration to positions of business community, which positively affect business involvement in institutional dynamics of the EAEU. That is affirmed by adding appropriate tasks to the key documents of the Union and introduction of special mechanisms for promoting business cooperation.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)"
1
YEROSHENKO, Xeniya. "TOWARDS TAX HARMONIZATION IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION: AN ANALYSIS OF LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ON COMPARATIVE BASIS WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Ferrara, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11392/2478790.
Full textAbstract:
L'autore ha esaminato e analizzato il Trattato sull'istituzione dell'Unione economica eurasiatica da una prospettiva di diritto fiscale con l'obiettivo di identificare: 1) la base giuridica e istituzionale per la potenziale armonizzazione fiscale nell'Unione economica eurasiatica e nella misura in cui sono paragonabili all'Unione europea; 2) nonché se l'attuale base giuridica e istituzionale dell'Unione economica eurasiatica sia sufficiente per intraprendere la necessaria armonizzazione fiscale nella regione e in che misura l'esperienza dell'Unione europea possa essere rilevante in questo processo. Sulla base di questa ricerca, l'autore ha redatto raccomandazioni per potenziali miglioramenti del sistema istituzionale EAEU e anche le raccomandazioni sulle modifiche necessarie al trattato EAEU per facilitare l'armonizzazione fiscale per l'effettiva realizzazione degli obiettivi del EAEU.
La tesi è composta da sei parti interconnesse, ognuna delle quali è dedicata a questioni particolari. La prima parte, oltre a introdurre il tema della ricerca, introduce la nozione di armonizzazione fiscale e il suo ruolo nel processo di integrazione economica in entrambi i sindacati. Tra le altre constatazioni, si conclude che l'armonizzazione fiscale nell'EAEU deve essere guidata da principi fondamentali ivi contenuti e entro i limiti stabiliti dal trattato EAEU e dalle leggi nazionali degli Stati membri e che l'esperienza dell'UE in questo aspetto rappresenta finora un esempio illustrativo e lezione, che può guidare l'EAEU in questa direzione, ma non necessariamente presenta il modello da seguire. Nella seconda parte, confrontando le strutture istituzionali in entrambe le Unioni e le rispettive capacità delle istituzioni dal punto di vista dell'armonizzazione fiscale, l'autore propone di rafforzare le posizioni della Commissione EAEU e della Corte EAEU attribuendo loro più poteri espliciti per agire in campo fiscale questioni correlate. Nella terza parte, l'autore identifica le principali somiglianze e differenze nella formulazione dei principi fondamentali nel trattato EAEU e nel TFUE, e sulla base dell'esperienza di interpretazione di tali libertà nell'UE in materia fiscale, valuta la capacità del trattato di far fronte a problemi fiscali simili. Sulla base dello stesso, l'autore raccomanda di modificare i principi EAEU per l'incorporazione e le attività di investimento per facilitare la realizzazione del mercato unico e la libera circolazione dei capitali. Nella quarta parte l'autore intraprende lo studio di simulazione e test sulla compatibilità dei sistemi nazionali sulla tassazione dei dividendi, con i principi fondamentali del EAEU per gli investimenti e le attività di incorporazione. Il risultato illustra la potenziale interpretazione dei principi nella pratica fiscale e mostra una potenziale incompatibilità dei regimi nazionali con nuovi principi sovranazionali. La quinta parte prende in considerazione altre tre questioni pertinenti nel processo di armonizzazione fiscale, quali: le fonti del diritto fiscale nel EAEU e le loro interrelazioni, la scelta del potenziale strumento per l'armonizzazione fiscale futura e considera in dettaglio il primo caso fiscale del EAEU Corte, in cui la Corte e la Commissione si sono posizionate in relazione a questioni fiscali nell'EAEU. Come risultato del quinto capitolo, l'autore raccomanda di chiarire la gerarchia delle diverse fonti del diritto tributario nell'EAEU, inclusi i trattati sulla doppia imposizione degli Stati membri e le decisioni delle sue istituzioni. Rispetto alla seconda questione, l'autore prevede che i trattati internazionali sono gli strumenti più probabili che gli stati membri useranno per scopi di armonizzazione fiscale nella regione, prendendo le attuali posizioni delle istituzioni del EAEU e la tradizione legale. La terza questione illustra la difficoltà dell'applicazione della legge EAEU e dimostra anche come la Corte EAEU e la Commissione hanno<br>In her thesis the author has reviewed and analyzed the Treaty on establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU Treaty) from a tax law perspective with the focus to identify: 1) the legal and institutional basis for potential tax harmonization in the Eurasian Economic Union and the extent they are comparable to the European Union; 2) as well as whether the current legal and institutional basis in the Eurasian Economic Union are sufficient to undertake the necessary tax harmonization in the region and to what extent the experience of the European Union may be relevant in this process. On the basis of this research, the author has drafted recommendations for potential enhancements of the EAEU institutional system and also the recommendations on necessary changes to the EAEU Treaty to facilitate tax harmonization for effective realization of the EAEU objectives.
The thesis consists of six interconnected parts, where each is devoted to particular issue. The first part, apart from introducing the research topic, introduces the notion of tax harmonization and its role in the process of economic integration in both unions. Among other findings, it concludes that tax harmonization in the EAEU shall be guided by fundamental principles therein and within the limits established by the EAEU Treaty and national laws of the member states and that the EU experience in this aspect is so far represents an illustrative example and lesson, which can guide the EAEU in this direction, but not necessarily presents the role model to follow. In the second part, having compared the institutional structures in both unions and respective capacities of institutions from tax harmonization point of view, the author proposes to strengthen the positions of the EAEU Commission and the EAEU Court with attributing them more explicit powers to act on tax related matters. In the third part, the author identifies the major similarities and differences in the wording of fundamental principles in the EAEU Treaty and TFEU, and based on the experience of interpreting these freedoms in the EU in tax related matters, assesses the ability of the EAEU Treaty to cope with the similar tax issues. On the basis of the same, author recommends to amend the EAEU principles for incorporation and investments activities to facilitate realization of the single market and the free movement of capital. In the fourth part the author undertakes the simulation study and tests on compatibility the national systems on dividends taxation with the EAEU fundamental principles for the investments and incorporation activities. The result illustrates potential interpretation of the principles in tax practice and shows potential incompatibility of the national regimes with new supranational principles. The fifth part considers three other issues relevant in the process of tax harmonization, such as: sources of tax law in the EAEU and their interrelationship, the choice of potential instrument for future tax harmonization and considers in details the first tax related case of the EAEU Court, where the Court and the Commission positioned themselves in relation to tax matters in the EAEU. As a result of the fifth chapter, the author recommends to clarify on the hierarchy of the different sources of tax law in the EAEU, including the double tax treaties of the member states and decisions of its institutions. With respect to the second issue the author predicts that international treaties are the most probable instruments that member states will use for tax harmonization purposes in the region, taken the current positions of EAEU institutions and the legal tradition. The third issue illustrates the difficulty with enforcement of EAEU law and also demonstrates how the EAEU Court and the Commission have diminished their own roles in tax related matters. The sixth part of the work provides overall conclusion.
2
Zakharyan, Anush <1997>. "Freedom of Movement of Labour in the Eurasian Economic Union." Master's Degree Thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/21231.
Full textAbstract:
Regional integration has contributed to shaping the current geopolitical landscape profoundly across the globe. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, a number of regional integration projects came to life in the post soviet space, with varying degrees of success. Many of these projects took an economic direction, but it was not until 2015 that the Eurasian Economic Union was officially created. The Union was built upon the pre-existing Customs Union and maintained its objective of a free market. With freedom of the market also came freedom of movement of labor. Before that, the movement of the citizens was fully left to bilateral agreements and the Commonwealth of Independent States, but the EAEU allowed a whole new range of rights and protections for workers who wish to move across the five countries that are its members. This work will address the rights of workers in the EAEU, and the consequences of these rights on the citizens, the economy, and the society of the member states. A comparison with the European Union is also drawn, as it allows for input and reflection on how the EAEU can move forward and what its strengths and weaknesses are.
3
Tonet, Elisabetta <1995>. "The Eurasian Economic Union and China - A fire bowl of interests." Master's Degree Thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/16114.
Full textAbstract:
Starting from a theoretical framework concerning regionalism and the emerging of the archipelago globalisation (M. Deaglio), this research has aimed to highlight the advantages that could be drawn from the development of EAEU by both its member countries (Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan) and China. The second chapter has been entirely dedicated to the EAEU, highlighting lopsided economic integration among its partner countries and different orientations in the foreign relations of its Members. The analysis shows how this Russia - led integration project then seems based on different expectations: Russia may cover a geopolitical strategic interest while an economic interest may be attributable to the other four Members. The third chapter analyses the China - EAEU relations. In analysing the role of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the Belt Road Initiative, a Chinese interest in Russia (Ice silk Route, Siberia) and in Central Asia is being highlighted, proving how the Chinese investments aim to further expand towards the West and to progressively acquire control over the energetic resources of the EAEU. The advantages which China may get are attributable to the chance to integrate the BRI with the EAEU, establishing even more a huge presence in the region. The EAEU is relatively young institution and still under development, and a fragile equilibrium permeates the China - EAEU relations; the risk for the EAEU, then, is not to succeed in establishing a peer relation with China.
4
STEPANITSKAYA, Oxana. "Taxation of nonprofit organizations in the European Union: Problems and experience for the Eurasian Economic Union (The case of direct taxation)." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Ferrara, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11392/2478792.
Full textAbstract:
In tutto il mondo le organizzazioni non profit (ONP) sono riconosciute come uno degli elementi strutturali più importanti della società moderna e sostenute dai governi nazionali in vari modi, anche attraverso benefici fiscali. Allo stesso tempo, le attività delle ONP negli ultimi decenni hanno cessato di essere solo un fenomeno nazionale. Le organizzazioni non profit investono di più oltre i confini nazionali come parte della loro strategia di gestione patrimoniale e i donatori individuali e aziendali stanno aumentando le loro donazioni filantropiche al di fuori dei loro paesi d'origine.
La tesi si propone di studiare gli strumenti giuridici per organizzare l'effettiva tassazione delle ONP nell'UE e di sviluppare raccomandazioni e idee che potrebbero essere potenzialmente utilizzate nella legge UEEA, per stabilire un regime fiscale efficace per le ONP in UEEA. La ricerca si concentra sulla tassazione dei redditi transfrontalieri delle ONP (reddito attivo e passivo, compresi i redditi derivanti da attività economiche, redditi da investimenti, entrate sotto forma di donazioni, regali ed eredità) e sulla tassazione del reddito dei loro donatori.
Particolare enfasi nella tesi viene fatta sul problema principale della normativa fiscale europea in relazione alle ONP: applicazione di regimi fiscali nazionali discriminatori dei paesi ospitanti alle ONP operanti su scala transfrontaliera (all'interno dell'UE).
In primo luogo la tesi si propone di evidenziare le buone e cattive pratiche esistenti, di analizzare le soluzioni pratiche e politiche esistenti e potenziali, per migliorare il modo in cui il principio di non discriminazione è implementato nelle leggi fiscali nazionali. A tale scopo, il documento analizza i regimi fiscali nazionali per le ONP nazionali e straniere e i loro donatori nei paesi dell'UE, nonché l'impatto della giurisprudenza della UEEA sull'attuazione del principio di non discriminazione nelle loro legislazioni. Il principale blocco di ricerca si basa sullo studio delle norme giuridiche, della giurisprudenza, delle leggi non vincolanti, delle linee guida e delle raccomandazioni sviluppate nella legislazione dell'UE.
Quindi, viene effettuata una valutazione sull'applicabilità delle migliori soluzioni sviluppate nell'UE per il loro utilizzo nell' UEEA. A tal fine, la dissertazione mette a confronto le legislazioni fiscali di tutti gli Stati membri dell'Unione economica eurasiatica, in particolare Armenia, Bielorussia, Kirghizistan, Kazakistan, Russia, riguardo i criteri più importanti che determinano la natura dell'ambiente fiscale per l'attività delle ONP transfrontaliere. Uno dei risultati provvisori di questa tesi è la conclusione che attualmente nei paesi UEEA non esiste un ambiente fiscale e giuridico favorevole per lo sviluppo delle attività transfrontaliere (intra-UEEA) delle ONP. Basandosi sull'analisi dei regimi fiscali per le ONP nei paesi UEEA, e anche tenendo conto del livello di integrazione nell' UEEA stesso, l'autore conclude che sono applicabili solo alcune soluzioni sviluppate nell'UE. Ll'autore raccomanda le seguenti modalità di armonizzazione della legislazione fiscale delle ONP: 1) firma di trattati bilaterali / multilaterali; 2) adozione di atti giuridici modello; 3) introduzione di uno Statuto modello delle ONP; in subordine, la possibilità di un uso futuro di soluzioni più avanzate tratte dalla pratica europea.<br>Around the world non-profit organizations (NPOs) are recognized as one of the most important structural elements of modern society, and supported by national governments in various ways, including through tax benefits. At the same time, the activities of NPOs in recent decades have ceased to be only a national phenomenon. Nonprofit organizations are investing more across national boundaries as part of their asset management strategy, and individual and corporate donors are increasing their philanthropic giving outside of their home countries.
This dissertation aims to study the legal instruments of organizing effective taxation of NPOs in the EU and to develop recommendations and ideas which could potentially be used in EAEU law to establish effective tax regime for NPOs in the EAEU. The research focuses on the taxation of cross-border incomes of NPOs (active and passive incomes, including income from economic activities, investment income, revenues in the form of donations, gifts and inheritances) and on the taxation of income of their donors.
Particular emphasis in the thesis is made on the main problem of European tax law with regard to NPOs – application of discriminatory national tax regimes of host countries to NPOs operating in cross-border (within the EU) scale.
First, the thesis aims to highlight good and bad existing practice, to analyze existing and potential practical and policy solutions to improve the way that the non-discrimination principle is implemented in national tax laws. For this purpose, the paper analyzes the national tax regimes for domestic and foreign NPOs and their donors in EU countries, as well as the impact of ECJ case law on implementation of the non-discrimination principle in their legislation. The major part of the research is based on the study of legal rules, case law, soft laws, guidelines and recommendations as developed in EU law.
Then, an assessment is made of the applicability of the best solutions developed in the EU for use in the EAEU. For this purpose, the dissertation compares the tax legislation of all Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union, namely Armenia, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Russia, separately for several important criteria that determine the nature of the fiscal environment for cross-border NPO activities. One of the interim findings of this thesis is the conclusion that currently in the EAEU countries there is no favorable tax and legal environment for the development of NPOs' cross-border (intra-EAEU) activities. Based on the analysis of tax regimes for NPOs in the EAEU countries, and also taking into account the level of integration of the EAEU, the author concludes that only some solutions developed in the EU are applicable. Given that the Eurasian Economic Union is at its starting stage of full integration into a single market and that competencies of supranational bodies, such as the Eurasian Commission are still limited, the author recommends the following methods of harmonizing tax legislation in relation to NPOs: 1) signing of bilateral / multilateral treaties; 2) adoption of model legal acts; 3) introduction of a Model Statute of NPOs and other methods; with the possibility of future use of more advanced solutions drawn from European practice.
5
Martirosyan, Nelli. "Protecting IP at the Border : A Study of Customs Enforcement Mechanism for Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in the Eurasian Economic Union." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-412925.
Full text
6
Kulubekova, Galiya. "LEGAL PERSONALITY OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS IN GLOBALIZING WORLD." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Padova, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11577/3427248.
Full textAbstract:
Transnational corporations have an acute effect on the development of the economy. Being a result of dynamic international integration processes, they have transformed from a consequence to the main accelerators and enablers of globalization within a short period of time. In the modern world, the economic progress and the global competitiveness of states depend heavily on the activities of transnational corporations.
On the other hand, the activities of transnational corporations shall be adequately regulated by nations, as representatives of human interests, in order to prevent violations, which might be performed by these business conglomerates in their pursuit of profit. Therefore, the study of transnational corporations from the legal standpoint is essential. At the same time, the law does not recognize a “unit” nature of a transnational corporation. The legal personality of a transnational corporation is basically reduced to the legal personalities of the entities comprising its structure. In this question, the economy is ahead of the law. There have been developed several theories, which tried to solve this discrepancy but due to many reasons they do not seem to have succeeded in it.
The ambiguous status of transnational corporations did not allow to develop a unified effective regulation and eventually resulted in the multilevel regulation system. In the frame of it, each level brings different instruments which are designed to fill the gaps in the legal regulation of transnational corporations by compensating for the shortcomings of other levels. It is worth to analyze the whole system in order to find out the perspectives of legal development in the field of transnational corporations' regulation. This question receives even more importance in the light of growing regional economic integration trends.<br>Le società transnazionali hanno un forte impatto sullo sviluppo dell'economia. Essendo un risultato di processi dinamici di integrazione internazionale, si sono trasformate in breve tempo da conseguenza ad acceleratori principali e attori della globalizzazione. Nel mondo contemporaneo il progresso economico e la competitività degli Stati su scala globale dipendono fortemente dalle attività delle società transnazionali.
Tuttavia, le attività delle società transnazionali dovrebbero essere adeguatamente regolate dagli Stati, in quanto rappresentanti degli interessi dei loro cittadini, per prevenire violazioni che gli enti potrebbero commettere nella loro ricerca del profitto. Allo stesso tempo, la legge non riconosce lo stato di unicità alle società transnazionali. La persona giuridica di una società transnazionale è constituita dalle singole persone giuridiche, una per ognuna delle entità incluse in essa. Su questo, l'economia appare un passo avanti rispetto alla legge. Sono state formulate diverse teorie che hanno tentato di risolvere questa discrepanza, ma che, per ragioni diverse, non hanno avuto successo.
L’ambiguità della fattispecie delle società transnazionali non ha permesso lo sviluppo di una regolazione unica, arrivando così ad un sistema di regole differenziato su più livelli. In questo quadro legislativo, ogni livello porta con sè diversi strumenti atti a colmare i vuoti nella regolamentazione giuridica delle corpo società nazionali compensando i limiti di un altro livello. In questo senso, sarebbe opportuno analizzare l'intero sistema, in modo da formulare in campo giuridico una legislazione uniforme in materia di società transnazionali. Tale questione assume ancora più importanza se esaminata alla luce della tendenza crescente di integrazione regionale a livello economico.
7
Drozdov, Filipp. "Problematika uvádění obráběcích center na trh Evropské unie a Společenství nezávislých států." Master's thesis, Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství, 2020. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-433557.
Full textAbstract:
This thesis discusses introducing CNC machining centers to the markets of the European Union and the Commonwealth of Independent States (currently the Eurasian Economic Union). The first chapter of the thesis focuses on the legal requirements for placing the products on the markets of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union, their comparison, systematic analysis of the problem, and certification schemes. The second chapter of the thesis analyses safety requirements for CNC machining centers, discusses CNC machines checklists development and their comparison for the markets of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union.
8
Makarenko, Kateřina. "Euroasijská hospodářská unie - potenciál vztahů s EU." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2014. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-193390.
Full textAbstract:
Russian Federation has reconsidered its foreign policy on the European Union and is now focusing more on Eurasian integration. This step aroused various reactions in the world, especially after the creation of the Eurasian Economic Union in January 2015. This work deals with the intention of the Union, examines the steps which preceded this event and the possible influence of the eurasianism on Eurasian integration. At the same time, based on the statements of both parties -- European and Eurasian -- the work analyzes potential point of possible cooperation between the European Union and the newly formed regional integration Eurasian Economic Union.
9
Šorna, Petr. "Postavení Ruské federace v Eurasijském ekonomickém svazu." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-261750.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of the master's thesis is to find out the position of the Russsian Federation in the Eurasian Economic Union. The first chapter focuses on theoretical definition of the integration process, history of the Eurasian Economic Union, and theoretical definition of analysis which is used in the second part of the thesis. The second chapter researches the position of the Russian Federation in the Eurasian Economic Union. The objective of the third chapter is point out chosen characteristics of the Russian economy.
10
Belov, Artem. "Perspektivy rozvoje Euroasijské unie." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-136315.
Full textAbstract:
Collapse of Soviet Union caused a snap in relations between ex-soviet states, but simultaneously started the new wave of integration collaboration. This wave brings us such integrations as CIS, EurAsEC, Customs Union, Common Economic Space. Eurasian union, which is planning to become fully functional in 2015, becomes the most real of what happened in this field before. Main goal of diploma thesis is to find out, how could Eurasian union work in connection with organization moments of other deep integrations. Can Eurasian union become a deep integration? Other goal is to find out economic possibilities of integration development due to results of research, and suggest improvements of present situation. Last goal is to discover the way of developing of external trade policy and to determine the role of Eurasian union in the world.
Books on the topic "Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)"
1
Political Science Association of Armenia. Perspectives of co-existence of EU and EAEU integration processes: The case of Armenia = Perspektivy sovmeshchenii︠a︡ evropeĭskogo i evraziĭskogo integrat︠s︡ionnykh prot︠s︡essov : primer Armenii. Political Science Association of Armenia, 2018.
Find full text
2
Vinokurov, Evgeny. Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union. Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92825-8.
Full text
3
Mukhametdinov, Mikhail. The Eurasian Economic Union and Integration Theory. Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34288-3.
Full text
4
Institut ėkonomiki (Rossiĭskai︠a︡ akademii︠a︡ nauk), ed. Evraziĭskai︠a︡ integrat︠s︡ii︠a︡ v turbulentnom mire. Aleteĭi︠a︡, 2019.
Find full text
5
Institut ėkonomiki (Rossiĭskai͡a akademii͡a nauk), ed. Evraziĭskiĭ integrat︠s︡ionnyĭ proekt: Ėffekty i problemy realizat︠s︡ii : nauchnyĭ doklad. Institut ėkonomiki, 2013.
Find full text
6
Institut Dalʹnego Vostoka (Rossiĭskai͡a akademii͡a nauk), ред. Novyĭ shelkovyĭ putʹ i ego znachenie dli︠a︡ Rossii. DeLi pli︠u︡s, 2016.
Find full text
7
Kashirkina, Anna, and Andrey Morozov. Russia, Euroasian economic union and World Trade Organization. INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/6432.
Full textAbstract:
The monograph is the first scientific publication, considering the complex
 international legal issues of the integration of rapprochement of the Russian
 Federation, Belarus and Kazakhstan after the signing of the Heads of State May
 29, 2014 the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union. The monograph is held
 international legal analysis of the contractual framework prior Eurasian Economic
 Union integration union – Customs Union. The position of the new interstate
 integration association – the Eurasian Economic Union – as a subject of public
 international law. On the basis of comparative legal analysis mapped international
 legal obligations, operating under the World Trade Organization, as well as the
 provisions of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, including in the areas
 of customs regulation, industrial policies, and technical regulation. Give
 suggestions and recommendations for improving and promoting the integration
 of the former Soviet Union in the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union,
 taking into account Russia’s membership in the World Trade Organization, as well
 as the possible accession by the Republic of Belarus and the Republic of
 Kazakhstan – Russia’s partners in the Eurasian Economic Union.
 The monograph focuses on a wide range of readers: researchers and experts
 in the field of international law and international relations, employees of public
 authorities, business representatives, teachers and law faculties, graduate students,
 and all interested in the integration of the modern world.
8
Gorobet︠s︡, L. N. Evraziĭskai︠a︡ integrat︠s︡ii︠a︡: Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoĭ nauchno-prakticheskoĭ konferent︠s︡ii (22 senti︠a︡bri︠a︡ 2016 goda, g. Armavir, Rossii︠a︡). AGPU, 2016.
Find full text
9
Gorobet︠s︡, L. N. Evraziĭskai︠a︡ integrat︠s︡ii︠a︡: Materialy I Mezhdunarodnoĭ nauchno-prakticheskoĭ konferent︠s︡ii (1 dekabri︠a︡ 2015 goda, g. Armavir, Rossii︠a︡). AGPU, 2016.
Find full text
10
Gorobet︠s︡, L. N., and Vasilʹev A. A. Evraziĭskai︠a︡ integrat︠s︡ii︠a︡: Materialy V mezhdunarodnoĭ nauchno-prakticheskoĭ konferent︠s︡ii (9 i︠a︡nvari︠a︡ 2017 goda, g. Armavir, Rossii︠a︡). AGPU, 2017.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)"
1
Vinokurov, Evgeny. "EAEU Institutions." In Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union. Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92825-8_3.
Full text
2
Malikbayeva, Saniya, and Gabit Gabdullin. "The Rise of Anti-Eurasian Sentiment in Kazakhstan." In Securitization and Democracy in Eurasia. Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16659-4_4.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), established in 2015, marked a new stage of integration and cooperation between the post-Soviet States. Despite of the continuing economic and political struggle, Kazakhstan, which is considered to be one of the founding and most enthusiastic members of the union, is still committed to the initiative. This chapter explores anti-Eurasian narratives among the country’s population. Concerns over national sovereignty, national identity, and territorial integrity, in addition to the controversial economic benefits of the union, dominate the popular discourses. The trajectories of these discourses are also manifested vis-à-vis regional differences and along ethnic lines.
3
Jović-Lazić, Ana, and Ivona Lađevac. "The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and Its Relations with Serbia." In International Organizations. Institute of International Politics ; Economics ; Faculty of Philosophy of the University of St. Cyril ; Methodius, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18485/iipe_ioscw.2022.2.ch2.
Full text
4
Burmester, Isabell. "EU and Russian Prescription: Setting Rules and Standards for Food Safety." In The European Union in International Affairs. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75488-3_4.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This chapter delves into the prescription of food safety rules by the EU and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in Moldova and Armenia. While the EU’s influence through its market power and the Brussels effect is well-documented, the EAEU, led by Russia, has also emerged as a significant player in the region. The EAEU’s approach to food safety, however, contrasts starkly with the EU’s emphasis on ensuring safe production processes. Moldovan and Armenian actors perceived EU standards as superior, associating them with higher quality and safety for consumers, despite the higher compliance costs. Conversely, EAEU standards were viewed as lower and more attainable, a reflection of the legacy Soviet system integrated with new, albeit inconsistent, rules. This chapter examines how these differing standards and approaches influenced local regulatory practices and perceptions, highlighting the complexities and challenges faced by Moldova and Armenia in navigating the overlapping influences of these two powerful entities. The findings underscore the nuanced dynamics of regional hegemony in the domain of food safety and the varied responses of local actors to external regulatory prescriptions.
5
Dragneva, Rilka. "Chapter 8: Russia’s Agri-Food Trade Within the Eurasian Economic Union." In Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77451-6_9.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis chapter examines the role of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in Russia’s agricultural food trade. The discussion focuses on four of the most important areas affecting agri-food trade, namely the food safety regime, the effects of Russia’s food import ban, the agenda for agricultural cooperation, and the external free trade agreements of the bloc. The analysis identifies the critical role of structural factors in the build-up of obstacles to trade, including the weak common regime and its inability to constrain unilateral actions at the cost of integration. The chapter concludes that despite some recognition of the issues, fundamental changes are unlikely.
6
Burmester, Isabell. "EU and Russian Hegemonic Power Over Time: From a Common Neighbourhood Policy Towards Differentiation." In The European Union in International Affairs. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75488-3_6.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This chapter synthesises the diachronic comparison of the EU and Russia’s use of hegemonic power mechanisms (coercion, prescription, and co-optation) over time in Moldova and Armenia. It highlights how these mechanisms evolved and became more interlinked for the EU, while Russia developed them separately. The EU increasingly utilised conditionality and sanctions, linking these to the promotion of “European values” and food safety rules. As EU-Russia relations grew more contentious, Russia’s co-optation activities became more confrontational, emphasising the Othering of the EU. The analysis reveals that Russia’s use of coercion was closer to the ideal type, characterised by unilateral threats or punishments reacting to Western orientations in neighbourhood countries. The EU’s coercion, focused on rewards, demanded democratic and institutional reforms. In prescription, the EU’s approach, through extensive legislative approximation and regulatory obligations, was more coherent compared to Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) standards, which emulated EU norms but retained a product-focused safety approach.
7
Libman, Alexander. "(Mis)interpreting the Eurasian Economic Union? Images of the EAEU in Russia and the West." In Russia in the Changing International System. Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21832-4_5.
Full text
8
Toktogazieva, Saniia. "Human Rights Adjudication in Central Asia." In Polarization, Shifting Borders and Liquid Governance. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44584-2_7.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractIn this chapter, I will explore human rights adjudication in three Central Asian countries, namely, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan, in the context of external power dynamics. The chapter will show that external factors are shaping the internal political dynamics and fundamental rights adjudication in Central Asia. The cases discussed in this chapter will reveal a common trend across Central Asia involving a shift from monism toward dualism in constitutional texts and in the interpretations of Constitutional Courts (CCs) on the relationship between domestic law and international human rights law. Furthermore, the chapter will demonstrate that Central Asian CCs tend to adopt a pluralistic approach to interpreting the relationship between domestic law and laws regulating Russian-led regional organizations, such as the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).
9
Heigermoser, Maximilian, Tinoush Jamali Jaghdani, and Linde Götz. "Chapter 9: Russia’s Agri-Food Trade with the Middle East and North Africa." In Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77451-6_10.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is the top destination for Russian food exports, grains in particular. Focusing on Turkey, Egypt, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, this chapter shows that Russia’s food trade with MENA countries is strongly affected by bilateral political relations. Russia banned most food imports from Turkey over a political conflict in 2016. In the same year, improved intergovernmental cooperation with Saudi Arabia resulted in a diversification of Russia’s food exports to the Gulf country, and in 2019, Iran’s accession to the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) led to increasing food trade with Russia. Food imports in MENA countries are usually managed by powerful state trading enterprises (STEs), which recurrently disapprove food products originating from Russia based on non-adherence to food quality standards. Our analysis shows that Russia is successfully working to open additional destination markets, while simultaneously impeding imports of food products that it aims to produce domestically.
10
Gyiazov, Aidarbek T., Nurgazy Zh Isakov, Zhypara Asilbek Kyzy, and Tanirbergen S. Darkenbaev. "Practical Experience of Climate-Responsible Business in the Digital Economy Markets in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)." In Springer Climate. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45830-9_9.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)"
1
Умарова, Амала Алиевна. "CUSTOMS REGULATION IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION." In Образование. Культура. Общество: сборник избранных статей по материалам Международной научной конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Июнь 2020). Crossref, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/ecs291.2020.83.68.023.
Full textAbstract:
В договоре о Евразийском экономическом союзе предусмотрено, что в ЕАЭС осуществляется единое таможенное регулирование. В статье анализируются основные положения таможенного регулирования в ЕАЭС. The Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union stipulates that a single customs regulation is carried out in the EAEU. The article analyzes the main provisions of customs regulation in the EAEU.
2
Başeğmez, Nergiz, and Kerem Toker. "A Crossroad For Turkey: European Union Or Eurasian Economic Union." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c07.01668.
Full textAbstract:
With a long and complicated history with Turkey's EU relations began in 1963 with Ankara Agreement. Turkey has been engaged the full membership since 2005 but nevertheless it could not have achieved results during the negotiations. Behind the slow pace of Turkey's membership, many political and cultural barriers can be shown. The events showed that reveals Turkey cannot be an EU member as soon as possible. This case may cause the Turkey have different pursuits in the political world arena. Turkey moved away from the EU, it can be motivated to participate in different political and economic union at the same time. Because, the world is constantly changing in terms of economic and political conditions and Turkey is hard to question the position in these new conditions. Founded in 2015 Eurasian Union has similar cultural and historical heritage alongside the geographical closely EAEU with Turkey. This common history may create opportunities for both sides. In this study, economic, social and political relations between Turkey and the EAEU countries are briefly discussed. Datas about this issue were gathered by Eurostat, europa.eu, wto.org and eurasiancommission.org etc. official data sources. The findings were compared with similar indicators between Turkey and the EU. So the EAEU is evaluated likely to be an alternative political and economic union to Turkey. Such a vision changes in Turkey will revise its economic and political stability of the region. This paper may contribute to further studies by providing a solid base.
 
3
Pirimbaev, Jusup, and Anara Kamalova. "Economic Cooperation Development Issues between the EAEU." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c13.02595.
Full textAbstract:
The Organization of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is the first real attempt to conduct integration processes in the post-soviet space among several states. However, the question of its expansion at the expense of other states remains open, as well as the further deepening of relations within the Union and the improvement of the mechanisms for integrating the economies of the member states. In this regard, the analysis of the state of economic relations is carried out and the ways of solving some aspects of the coming period are shown. The main idea of solving the problems of the Union is the gradual and effective development of standards for economic relations.
4
Pirimbaev, Jusup, and Anara Kamalova. "New Challenges for the Development of the Eurasian Economic Union Economy." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c14.02657.
Full textAbstract:
The article, based on an analysis of the impact of the pandemic on the economic relations of the EAEU countries, reveals new areas of cooperation based on the situation of the post-pandemic period, as well as Russia’s special military-technical measures in relation to Ukraine. Therefore, the further development of cooperation between countries should not only be limited to the space of economic activity but should also cover political activity. The expansion of cooperation in the field of culture, medicine, science, and education is obvious. It requires finding solutions to the border problems between the member countries of the EAEU, by developing common mechanisms for mutual relations, while shifting the main burden to the external borders of the Union.
5
Silovs, Mihails, and Olga Dmitrijeva. "Differences in fishery and aquaculture products, their production and sale technical regulations in Eurasian Economic Union and legislation and practice of the European Union." In 22nd International Scientific Conference. “Economic Science for Rural Development 2021”. Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Faculty of Economics and Social Development, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/esrd.2021.55.052.
Full textAbstract:
The mandatory requirements for the fishery and aquaculture products, their production and sale in force in the territory of the Customs Union of the Eurasian Economic Union (CU EAEU) arise from the regulatory and legal acts of the Eurasian Economic Union and its predecessor - the Customs Union - and apply in a package approach similar to the law of the European Union pertaining to the food safety area. The requirements of the EAEU technical regulations have been analysed taking into account that European exporting enterprises are first of all obliged to comply with the requirements of the listed EU regulatory and legal acts applicable to their production process and products. The aim of this paper was to run a comparative analysis on the mandatory requirements of the food legislation of the European and Customs Unions regarding fishery and aquaculture products, their production and sale. The issues of certification of certain product categories are analysed separately, the requirements for canned fish being highlighted. The analysis is relevant for all fish processing companies which may consider the possibility of starting export to the countries of the CU EAEU and are intended to reduce costs associated with products’ entry into these markets.
6
Gündoğdu Odabaşıoğlu, Fatma. "Path to the Common Monetary Authority: An Assessment on Banking Sector of the Eurasian Economic Union Countries during the Economic Integration Proces." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c06.01269.
Full textAbstract:
Monetary union is one of the advanced stages of international economic integration and involves shared monetary and exchange rate policies that are executed collectively across union members. This common policy warrants price stability and requires a common supranational monetary authority. Existence of an established banking sector is crucial for effective execution of policy decisions taken by said monetary authorities. Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is officially established on January 1st of 2015 and is an example for a regional economic integration. Aim of the Union, which is comprised of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus and Republic of Armenia; is to increase collaboration among economies, to improve the living standards of the participating nations and to promote stable development.
 This study is based on assessment banking industries of member countries, working towards common monetary authority during the transition to EAEU economic integration between years 1995 and 2014. Data acquired from World Bank and member countries' central banks is used to determine the capabilities and limitations of partaking economies based on generally accepted financial strength indicators. 
 In conclusion; Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan are observed to be the principal EAEU members due to their advanced and strong banking industries. Increasing fragilities over the years, amplified also by developments in global markets, are evident in member countries; especially in Belarus and Armenia. Significance of achieving price stability in founding country Russian Federation is emphasized for successfully establishing a common monetary authority.
 
7
Ganiev, Junus, Tezcan Abasız, and Damira Baigonushova. "Foreign Capital Inflows and Economic Growth in the Eurasian Economic Union Countries." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c14.02615.
Full textAbstract:
The theoretical foundation for foreign capital-led growth hypothesis could be traced back to the neoclassical and endogenous growth theories, which see capital as the main source of growth. Foreign capital inflows are important because they close the savings-investment gap in developing countries. After independence, the Eurasian Economic Union countries, which were faced with the problem of inadequacy of domestic resources for economic development, became highly dependent on foreign sources and gave great importance to foreign aid and foreign debt, as well as to foreign investments. When viewed proportionally, the share of foreign aid is naturally low, and infrastructure investments constantly increase the external debt burden of future generations. On the other hand, although foreign direct investments contribute to the country’s economy, they do not directly increase the country’s debt burden. Therefore, it is considered as a more preferred foreign source. In this study, the effects of foreign investments and total external debt on economic growth in the EAEU countries were investigated. The quarterly data of five countries for the period of 2010-2021 were analyzed by panel data analysis. According to the panel ARDL cointegration approach, it has been revealed that there is a cointegration relationship between external resources and GDP in the EAEU countries. It has been determined that only foreign direct investments and total foreign debt have a statistically significant effect on GDP in the long run. In accordance with the general literature and theory, both coefficients were positive.
8
Dzhailov, Dzhumabek, and Mardalieva Leila. "Problems and Prospects of the Integration of the Agricultural Sector of Kyrgyzstan into The Eurasian Economic Union." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c09.01984.
Full textAbstract:
The analysis of the development of the agrarian market and mechanisms for ensuring its competitive development under conditions of integration is presented. It provides an analysis of the main macroeconomic indicators of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The evaluation of the level of development of branches of agrarian and industrial complex the EAEU and shows the role of the agricultural sector of Kyrgyzstan. Autopsy problems and causes of low competitiveness and efficiency of branches of the national agro-industrial complex. The prospects and the direction of the effective transformation of the agricultural sector of Kyrgyzstan in the Eurasian Integration formation, the mechanisms for the improvement of the agricultural policy within the framework of the EAEU are justified.
9
Baigonushova, Damira, Junus Ganiev, and Mairam Baigonusheva. "Government Support of the Agricultural Sector in the EAEU Countries." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c11.02291.
Full textAbstract:
As it is known, in 2010, a customs union with three participants, Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan, was formed on the territory of the former Soviet Union. In 2015, the union moved to another stage, the economic union. In 2015, Kyrgyzstan became a full member of this union and is currently trying to adapt to new economic conditions. In particular, the Agricultural Policy Department of the Eurasian Economic Commission is currently actively working on the development and implementation of common agricultural policy. Kyrgyzstan, despite the limited territory for agricultural production, is an agricultural country and has a comparative advantage in this sector. Therefore, the country should take an active role in the development of a common agricultural policy and create favorable conditions for the development of the own agrarian sector and use advantages. The purpose of this work is to analyze the developed plans and policies of the Agricultural Policy Department of the Eurasian Economic Commission, as well as conduct a comparative analysis with the common agricultural policy of the European Union, and at the end to make proposals.
10
Pirimbaev, Jusup, and Zalkar Kamalov. "On the Forecast of the Development of the Eurasian Economic Union." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c11.02283.
Full textAbstract:
The course of economic integration within the framework of the EAEU is proceeding according to a plan outlined in a document on the Union’s development forecast until 2030, when first three countries were members of the EAEU - Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus. Later, two more countries joined the union - Armenia and Kyrgyzstan. Then based on the real situation, additional adjustments were made. Many problems remain that need to be solved precisely in the field of integration, which, on the one hand, cause the need for an accelerated approach, and on the other, raise doubts about the prospects of this alliance. The article is aimed to study the causes of disputes, identifying factors contributing to the unification of participants, and developing an objective vision of the Union’s development prospects. And also, based on the analysis of today’s relationships among the members of the Eurasian Economic Union, appropriate conclusions and recommendations will be made for further relationship improvement by considering the perspectives of voluntary joining of other countries into the Eurasian Economic Union.
Reports on the topic "Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)"
1
Vielmini, Fabrizio. Uzbekistan and the Eurasian Economic Union: Pros and Cons. TOSHKENT SHAHRIDAGI XALQARO VESTMINSTER UNIVERSITETI, 2019. https://doi.org/10.70735/nxfj3059.
Full textAbstract:
All Central Asian countries are developing their tourism potentials. Much more could be done if the five create a specific regional- based coordination mechanism to address existing hindrances on border crossing, administrative requirements and visa issuing. Overall, such a regional cooperation would also improve the brand of Central Asia as a tourist destination fostering demand and leading to improved connectivity within the region. By this way, tourism may in the long run strengthen the long-sought aim of regional integration.
2
Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, Arevik, and Jules Hugot. Gravity-Based Tools for Assessing the Impact of Tariff Changes. Asian Development Bank, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/wps220053-2.
Full textAbstract:
The first tool estimates the impact on bilateral trade for 5,020 products in a partial equilibrium framework. The second quantifies the general equilibrium impact on bilateral aggregate trade, allowing estimates of trade reallocation and welfare changes. The paper uses these to estimate the impact for Armenia of tariff changes including (i) alignment with the external tariff of the Eurasian Economic Union, (ii) free trade agreements between the Eurasian Economic Union and other economies—Iran and the People’s Republic of China, and (iii) loss of beneficiary status for the European Union’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences.
3
EAEU INTEGRATION PROCESSES AND RUSSIAN FEDERATION LEGISLATION IN THE ECONOMY. DOI CODE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/2706-1962-2020-00001.
Full textAbstract:
Interstate integration in the modern world is actively developing, and as a result - similar processes are observed in the sphere of law. In this regard, it is clear that there is a need to reflect and identify general trends in the transformation of Russian legislation under the influence of integration processes. Given that integration processes primarily affect the economic spheres of activity, which are governed more by business legislation, it can be assumed that the greatest impact of integration processes is observed in this branch of law. This article is devoted to one of the pressing problems of business law - determining the role of integration processes (in the example of the EAEU) in improving business legislation. The article contains a brief analysis of the process of creation and development of the Eurasian Economic Union, as well as the results of monitoring the regulatory framework for the impact of the EAEU integration processes on the legislation of the Russian Federation on business activities. The article can be useful to students, graduate students and doctoral students working on business law and legal integration.
4
A guide to a unitary flexible algorithm for managing changes in the rules of registration and examination of medicines within the EAEU. SIB-Expertise, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/er0819.12072024.
Full textAbstract:
The guide to the algorithm is a body of knowledge on the procedure for solving problems of managing changes in the rules for registration and examination of medicinal products for medical use within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU Rules) based on the accelerated implementation methodology AIM (Accelerated Implementation Methodology). The manual is not a conceptual constant of action, but serves as the basis on which each organization involved in the creation and implementation of changes to the EAEU Rules can use certain functions, life cycle stages, tools, methods, templates necessary for management. The algorithm under consideration is built on the basis of a unitary change management system and has a flexible three-level structure, consisting of preparatory, main and final blocks. The algorithm allows not only to optimize the change management system, but also to accelerate their development and implementation in pharmaceutical practice. The algorithm is focused on participants in the registration and examination of medicines within the EAEU, and is intended for manufacturers and consumers of services for registration of medicines. Some of its elements can also be used in managing changes in medical and pharmaceutical organizations, as well as in various regulatory legal acts.