To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).
Journal articles on the topic 'Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Yerimpasheva, Aida T., Aida M. Myrzakhmetova, and Dina U. Alshimbayeva. "Conjugation of the Eurasian economic union and the belt road initiative: the role and place of Kazakhstan." R-Economy 8, no. 2 (2022): 172–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/recon.2022.8.2.014.
Full textAbstract:
Relevance. In mass media, the Silk Road Economic Belt and the Eurasian economic integration are considered as the driving forces behind Eurasia’s development. Nevertheless, the processes of Eurasian integration have been impeded by the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, 2020-22 have been marked by political turmoil in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) member states. Modelled on the European Union, the Eurasian Union increasingly resembles the former Soviet Union, which is a matter of concern for the member states. On the other hand, the growing democratic sentiments in the post-Soviet countries and the competition between Russia and China for influence in Eurasia make the cooperation of the EAEU and the Belt Road Initiative (BRI) more problematic. Research objective. The study examines the opportunities and challenges associated with the possible integration of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the Belt Road Initiative. Methods and Data. In this paper, we used an exploratory research design relying on collecting secondary and primary qualitative data. Methodologically, the study is based on the approaches of positive and nominative economics. The qualitative research in the form of in-depth interviews helped us gain insight into the economic problems of the EAEU member states. We also analyzed the dynamics of each member country’s GDP and compared it with that of China for the period from 2012 to present. Results. The compatibility of national and transnational interests in the EAEU programs is one of the main issues that have to be addressed. There have been specified areas of the EAEU’s development, many of which reveal the Russian Federation’s dominating role in managing the Union. According to the experts we have interviewed, to implement its programs, the EAEU needs significant centralization of power. On the other hand, the unresolved social, economic, and political issues can become a significant obstacle to the integration. Conclusion. Despite the widespread belief that the BRI would bring significant welfare and trade benefits to its participants, the EAEU member countries and China first need to focus on implementing political reforms, which the social and economic agenda hinges upon.
2
Ebrahimitorkaman, Ali. "EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION AND IRAN." RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Political Sciences. History. International Relations, no. 4 (2021): 47–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2021-4-47-60.
Full textAbstract:
After the collapse of the USSR, Russia lost its superpower status as well as its influence over a very large territory in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Caucasus. The Western countries, primarily the United States, took advantage of this to include these regions in the orbit of their influence. At the beginning of the 21st century, Russia has begun to regain its presence in Central Asia and the Caucasus by creating such organizations as the EAEU and the SCO. At the same time, Russia pursued the goal of returning the superpower positions lost after the collapse of the USSR. One of the important reasons for the formation of the EAEU was that some countries of the former USSR felt the need to restore economic ties that had existed before 1991. This organization soon began to expand towards the Middle East. Iran was one of the first countries in the region to start negotiations with the organization. This article presents an analysis of Iran’s relationship with the EAEU. In 2019, the Agreement on the Free Trade Zone of Iran with the EAEU entered into force, which led to a significant increase in bilateral trade. A possible entry into the EAEU for Iran, on the one hand, will not bring very large economic benefits due to the peculiarities of the structure of its economy and the need for modern technologies that this organization cannot provide for this country. However, it will allow Iran to expand and deepen its interaction with the countries of Central Asia and resist the US pressure. In particular, it will be possible for Iran to neutralize the impact of the devastating American economic sanctions by developing ties with the EAEU in the field of economy.
3
Chernykh, I. A., and R. R. Burnashev. "Integration Processes within the Eurasian Economic Union: Kazakhstan’s Narratives." Kutafin Law Review 8, no. 2 (2021): 289–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2021.2.16.289-313.
Full textAbstract:
Integration processes in the Eurasian space are ambiguously assess both by officials and an expert community of the member countries. Thus, there is still a discussion in Kazakhstan and various narratives are being formed concerning the expediency of the country’s presence in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the advantages and challenges associated with this participation. The article deals with the main narratives that are presenting in Kazakhstan and describing the integration processes within the EAEU — official and expert (both critical about the EAEU and supporting Eurasian integration). The analysis conducted in the article is based on the understanding of the narrative as a “statement-result”, defined by its structure (coherence between key concepts). The article shows that all narratives about the EAEU, present in the Kazakhstani discourse, have a similar structure, formed by the concepts of “independence”, “integration”, “politics” and “economics”. The differences between the narratives are determined by the emphasis on either the “independencepolitics” or “integration-economics” constellations (linkages), and the proposed format of regionalization of Kazakhstan within Central Asia or Eurasia.
4
Sahakyan, Mher D., and Yuntian Zheng. "China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the Eurasian Economic Union." Iran and the Caucasus 28, no. 3 (2024): 317–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573384x-02803007.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This article focuses on the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). It argues that EAEU members and China need each other to implement their two major initiatives. As a result of the conjunction of the EAEU and BRI, China and the EAEU states linked their transportation infrastructure, which provided them opportunities for modernization and growth. The EAEU member states established contacts with the second economy of the world at a multilateral level as well. The Agreement on Economic and Trade Cooperation between the Eurasian Economic Union and Its Member States, of the One Part, and the People’s Republic of China, of the other Part, signed in 2018, which came into force in 2019, provided added impetus to strengthen economic relations and created a legal platform for the further harmonization of the BRI with the EAEU. This article also argues that the conjunction of the EAEU and BRI has a political meaning as well. It means that in post-Soviet Eurasia, Russia and China have chosen cooperation over competition, as they are the main initiators of these economic and political integration initiatives. It explains that it fully coincides with the national interests of other members of the EAEU, such as Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan, as these states can cooperate with both Russia and China without choosing any side. This contribution concludes that cooperation between China and the EAEU in post-Soviet Eurasia improves security level and contributes to peaceful, cooperative development.
5
Demchenko, Elena. "Confectionery Standards in the Eurasian Economic Union." Food Processing: Techniques and Technology 52, no. 4 (2022): 819–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2022-4-2409.
Full textAbstract:
A barrier-free trade in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) market is impossible without a unified approach to standardization. The research objective was to analyze and develop proposals that would make it possible to unify the standards of the Eurasian Economic Commission (EAEC) on the content of sulfur dioxide and sulfites in confectionery products.
 The study featured technical regulations and standards for confectionery products, methods for determining sulfur dioxide, and EAEU resources on the results of control oversight activities. The methods included comparison, analogy, analysis, synthesis, peer review, integrated standardization, and system analysis.
 The analysis involved the official websites of the authorized bodies of the EAEU states on control and supervisory measures for compliance with technical regulations. It revealed the main reasons behind the limited confectionery turnover associated with excessive sulfur dioxide and sulfites. The standards showed discrepancies with Technical Regulations of Customs Union TR CU 022/2011 and TR CU 029/2012. The content standards for sulfur dioxide and sulfites in finished products were different. The analysis detected no unified approach to indicators, measurement units, and detection methods. The authors also assessed the advantages and disadvantages of the existing domestic State Standards for methods of sulfur dioxide and sulfite detection in confectionery products. The state standards have to be adapted to the international standards and EU Directives, in particular, by certifying the Monier-Williams method.
 The results can help to unify national and international regulations in order to remove technical barriers in the EAEU market and increase the export volume. They also can help confectionery producers to improve the quality and safety of confectionery products.
6
Golovina, E. E., and S. A. Velikaia. "CONJUGATION OF THE COUNTRIES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION AND CASPIAN REGION." Sovremennaya nauka i innovatsii, no. 4 (36) (2021): 173–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.37493/2307-910x.2021.4.19.
Full textAbstract:
The Eurasian Economic Union as an international organization of regional economic integration is the middle space within which the global project of the Greater Eurasian Partnership is formed. The triad of Eurasian states of the EAEU (Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan) form the basis of this Union and the integration potential of its development. The specifics of the EAEU geographical space is in conjunction with the most important international organizations of Eurasia, within the geopolitical and economic boundaries of which the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), the European Union (EU) and others are developing. A special place is occupied by the informal association of the Caspian Region states (CRS), where the geopolitical project " The Greater Caspian Region" is being formed. In the framework of this configuration possible approaches to the conjugation of the most important segments of the EEU and the Caspian region development are considered.
7
Ryabchikov, Anton A., and Evdokiya O. Eremeeva. "ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY INSTRUMENTS OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION." TODAY AND TOMORROW OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY, no. 109-110 (2022): 99–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.26653/1993-4947-2022-109-110-08.
Full textAbstract:
This article discusses the set of economic diplomacy (ED) instruments used by the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). It analyses the current EAEU mechanism of negotiating regional trade agreements (RTAs) with third countries, international organisations and integration. It outlines the main goals and priorities of the EAEU RTS network creation process. It gives an overview of the existing procedures for implementing the association’s trade remedies, as well as the substance of its export promotion measures. It is concluded that despite the comparative limitations of the ED-tools of the EAEU at the current stage, the integration group can still be characterized as an actor in this area. The potential for expanding the subject field of EAEU’s international trade agreements, as well as for supplementing the existing set of measures of supranational export support for member countries, has been identified.
8
Danilovna Kovaleva, Valentina, Mikhail Gennadevich Rusetskiy, Zhanna Alexandrovna Shadrina, Gayane Agopovna Kochyan, and Larisa Stanislavovna Zarovnaya. "Current Issues of Economic Security of the Eurasian Economic Union." International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, no. 3.14 (2018): 343. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.14.17023.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers the main aspects that characterize the economic security system of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and means to ensure economic security that contribute to increasing economic potential and to creating conditions for the effective development of integration processes. The authors investigated the main documents of the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC), a constantly acting regulating body of the EAEU, and developed recommendations for creating unified strategies of the economic security of the Eurasian Economic Union that can be implemented in the system of risk management that, in turn, is based on the controlling toolkit. In the process of the research it was determined that the political aspect alone is not enough for the preservation and effective development of the Eurasian Economic Union as common economic interests and possible effects from their implementation are the crucial components of viability of any integration union including the EAEU country members. In this regard the formation of the system of economic security of the integration union of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan is a relevant issue. In order to contribute to the integration of the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union that is based on the geopolitical aspect it is necessary to ensure economic security which determines both the theoretical and practical significance of the study. At the same time such integration would promote the unification of the EAEU countries that are different in the level of their socio-economic development.
9
Petrov, Roman, and Paul Kalinichenko. "On Similarities and Differences of the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union Legal Orders: Is There the Eurasian Economic Union Acquis?" Legal Issues of Economic Integration 43, Issue 3 (2016): 295–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/leie2016014.
Full textAbstract:
This contribution is devoted to the study of legal order of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). It is done through the analysis of similarities and differences of the EAEU legal order with those of the European Union (EU). It is argued that the notion ‘EU acquis’ has been extended beyond the EU and has been exported to legal orders of other international organizations. It poses the question whether the notion ‘acquis’ can have the same meaning within the legal order of the EAEU. On the one hand, some institutional similarities between the EAEU and the EU as well as the dynamic nature of the EAEU legal order give us a ground to apply the notion ‘acquis’ with regard to the EAEU in order to describe the political and legal heritage of the integration projects within the post- Soviet area. On the other hand, considerable differences between the EU and the EAEU legal systems (different degrees of supranationality, weak role of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union, and strictly normative understanding of the definition of the ‘Union Law’ in the EAEU Treaty) bring into question the relevance of the notion of the ‘EAEU acquis’. Analysis of the notion ‘EAEU acquis’ encourages a discussion about the necessity to revisit its narrow scope towards inclusion of fundamental concepts of common values, founding principles like rule of law and non-discrimination and direct effect.
10
Mikhnevich, S. V., and M. A. Aksenov. "Eurasian Business in Developing Eurasian Economic Integration." EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics 18, no. 1 (2024): 140–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2024-01-140-152.
Full textAbstract:
Aim. The study of the involvement of the business community in the development of Eurasian integration through the reflection of their priorities in the decisions and activities of supranational bodies.Tasks. To analyze the problems of reflecting the interests of the business community in Eurasian integration; to consider the related practical interaction of business with supranational bodies on the example of the activities of the EAEU Business Council; to identify areas of development of integration processes within the EAEU that are promising from the point of view of the business community.Methods. The research uses general scientific and special methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis, as well as the author’s methodology for assessing business involvement in integration processes has been developed and applied.Results. The conducted analysis of valid strategic documents of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and its supranational bodies using the authors’ technique confirms the considerable and growing role of business in Eurasian economic integration.Conclusions. Trade and investment cooperation under the EAEU demonstrates positive dynamics despite growing international uncertainty and tensions. It is in many ways connected with the proactive stance of Eurasian business, which demonstrates substantial and rising interest towards Eurasian economic integration.The Eurasian supranational bodies pay serious and growing consideration to positions of business community, which positively affect business involvement in institutional dynamics of the EAEU. That is affirmed by adding appropriate tasks to the key documents of the Union and introduction of special mechanisms for promoting business cooperation.
11
Kadyrkulov, U. T., and К. А. Ajekbarov. "Insurance in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)." Entrepreneur’s Guide 14, no. 2 (2021): 86–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-2-86-97.
Full textAbstract:
The paper considers the insurance sector of the EAEU countries is analyzed: Russia, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and the Republic of Belarus. The development of insurance markets in the EAEU member states differ significantly. The lowest level of development of the insurance industry is characterized by Armenia and Kyrgyzstan, the highest level of development is in Russia. The paper also examines the restrictions on the reinsurance market in the EAEU countries.
12
Ershov, V. V. "Eurasian Economic Union Law." Rossijskoe pravosudie 5 (May 25, 2021): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2021.5.5-12.
Full textAbstract:
The author investigated the problems of the role and nature of legal relations, legal and individual regulators of legal relations, modern types of legal understanding, metamodernity. The sources, forms, gaps in the law of the Eurasian Economic Union are analysed. The concept of the EAEU law in the metamodern paradigm and from the position of scientifically grounded concept of integrative legal understanding is elaborated.
13
Knobel, A. "Eurasian Economic union: Prospects and challenges for Development." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 3 (March 20, 2015): 87–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-3-87-108.
Full textAbstract:
The paper is devoted to the analysis of development prospects and problems of Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus and Armenia. It considers integration problems inside EAEU, interactions of EAEU with other CIS countries and with countries from the rest of the world. The paper shows that the major integration challenge inside EAEU is the domination of the redistributive motive over the creative one. It estimates the value of the oil and gas transfer from Russia to other EAEU members and the influence of the Russian tax maneuver on this transfer. The paper shows the need in redistribution mechanism inside EAEU as a necessary condition for getting the potential positive economic effects of free trade with other countries. It also assesses the risks for EAEU due to Russian embargo for food imports from countries of the sanctions list and possible application of tariff in the trade with Ukraine.
14
Likhacheva, A. B. "Eurasian Economic Union and Integration Process in the Asia-Pacific." Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law 12, no. 1 (2019): 69–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-1-69-85.
Full textAbstract:
In 2015, Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus formed the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), later joined by Kyrgyzstan and Armenia. The Eurasian Economic Commission (EAEC), one of the key supranational bodies of the Union, received the mandate to conduct all negotiations on trade liberalization, including negotiations on FTAs with other countries, became the main operator of the conjunction of EAEU and One belt One road Initiative (OBOR), – and, thus, an important agent of promoting the interests of member states in the Asia-Pacific region. Moreover, in the future we can expect the expansion of the Commission’s mandate to other areas of international cooperation affecting the economic interests of Russia. In the context of the policy of the Turning to the East that Russia has pursued in recent years, such a redistribution of roles between the national and supranational levels requires further study. However, due to the young age of the association, both in the Russian and foreign literature, we can find relatively few studies on the international role of the EAEU and, in particular, of the EAEC. This article analyzes the Commission’s international tracks with Asian countries that are currently open and attempts to study other formats of international interaction that might involve the Commission in the future according to its current mandate. The results of the study indicate that bilateral tracks remain the dominant ones for the Commission, and the transition to multilateral negotiations within the EAEU-ASEAN or EAEU-RSEP formats can only occur in the medium term. This conclusion has been confirmed by the analysis of open information about the negotiations of the Commission, and a series of expert interviews conducted during the research.
15
Vinokurov, E. "Eurasian Economic Union: A sober look." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 12 (December 20, 2016): 43–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-12-43-60.
Full textAbstract:
The paper appraises current progress in establishing the Customs Union and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Although the progress has slowed down after the initial rapid advancement, the Union is better viewed not as an exception from the general rules of regional economic integration but rather as one of the functioning customs unions with its successes and stumbling blocs. The paper reviews the state of Eurasian institutions, the establishment of the single market of goods and services, the situation with mutual trade and investment flows among the member states, the ongoing work on the liquidation/unification of non-tariff barriers, the problems of the efficient coordination of macroeconomic policies, progress towards establishing an EAEU network of free trade areas with partners around the world, the state of the common labor market, and the dynamics of public opinion on Eurasian integration in the five member states.
16
Neshataeva, Tatiana N. "The Concept of the Law of the Eurasian Economic Union." Rossijskoe pravosudie, no. 2 (January 16, 2025): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2025.2.95-107.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the law of the Eurasian Economic Union, its concept, sources and features. The concept of “EAEU law” is used in the meaning of the “legal system of the EAEU” – a complex category that includes all sources of law of this integration association. The EAEU Treaty identified the sources of the “EAEU law”: the EAEU Treaty itself: international treaties of the Union with a third party; decisions and orders of the Union’s bodies – the Supreme Eurasian Economic Union, the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council, the Eurasian Economic Commission (para. 1 of Art. 6). The analysis of the sources of integration law made it possible, from the point of view of legal force, to divide them into sources of “hard law” and sources of “soft law”. These sources of “EAEU law” are classified depending on their legal obligation. There is a tendency to increase the regulatory importance of “soft law” acts in the process of integration development. Conclusions are drawn about the peculiarities of the law-making process in the EAEU, the special role of the EAEU Court, and an assessment of its legal positions is given. The concept of a “unified harmonized legal space” and methods for achieving uniformity of legal regulation within the EAEU are considered: unification, harmonization and coordination of law.
17
Radkova, Eugenia, and Irina Petrova. "Clinical trials in the Eurasian Economic Union." Medical Writing 32, no. 1 (2023): 66–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.56012/odis4682.
Full textAbstract:
In January 2021, the single market of medicines of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) was launched. This article describes the current status of the transition to unified rules for the registration of medicinal products and the main regulatory documents for conducting clinical trials in the EAEU region.
18
Pilipenko, Igor V. "Towards an Enhanced Institutional Structure of the Eurasian Economic Union." Economic Strategies 152 (March 25, 2020): 102–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.33917/es-2.168.2020.102-111.
Full textAbstract:
This article considers how to enhance the institutional structure of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in order to enable timely decision-making and implementation of governance decisions in the interests of Eurasian integration deepening. We compare the governance structures of the EAEU and the European Union (EU) using the author’s technique and through the lens of theories of neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism elaborated with respect to the EU. We propose to determine a major driver of the integration process at this stage (the College of the Eurasian Economic Commission or the EAEU member states), to reduce the number of decision-making bodies within the current institutional structure of the EAEU, and to divide clearly authority and competence of remaining bodies to exclude legal controversies in the EAEU.
19
IVANTSOV, A. V. "Greater Eurasian partnership: economic perspectives of integration with the EAEU." Актуальные проблемы международных отношений и глобального развития, no. 9 (December 6, 2021): 303–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.33581/2311-9470-2021-9-303-312.
Full textAbstract:
This article analyzes the current state and future prospects of integra- tion associations and formats of multilateral economic cooperation from the point of view of the implementation of the Comprehensive Eurasian Partnership initiative. The author analyzes the role of this initiative as an instrument of Russian politics and assesses its potential for strengthening international cooperation in Eurasia. In partic- ular, it analyzes the possibilities of harmonizing key projects and initiatives within the EAEU. The work examines the potential of the largest multilateral formats in Eurasia as in the economic sphere – the Comprehensive Regional Economic Partner- ship, the Belt and Road Initiative, the Eurasian Economic Union, etc. to multilateral economic projects in Eurasia as a locomotive for promoting strategic interests, as well as realizing the potential of the EAEU. It is concluded that institutional overload is observed in the economic sphere of Greater Eurasia, caused by the existence of a number of parallel developments of in- tegration initiatives and mechanisms of economic cooperation. Based on the forego- ing, the strengthening of the EAEU as the institutional core of Greater Eurasia can become the basis for the formation of a regulatory mega-space. However, the aggre- gate economic potential of the EAEU member states does not allow the Union to be the largest economic pole and a leading center for the development of multilateral in- stitutions in Greater Eurasia. It is assumed that the solution to this problem could be the development of the Comprehensive Eurasian Partnership towards the conjugation of the EAEU and RCEP – the largest format for developing rules for international economic interaction in Asia and formulating specific proposals for building a system of mutually beneficial relations between the largest players of Eurasia, in which all interested states will be involved on mutually beneficial terms to strengthen interna- tional cooperation.
20
Rafalyuk, Elena E. "Sources of Legal Regulation of Integration Relations in the Eurasian Economic Union." Rossijskoe pravosudie, no. 3 (January 27, 2025): 100–112. https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2025.3.100-112.
Full textAbstract:
The article continues the theme of research devoted to the law of the Eurasian Economic Union and its sources. The subject of consideration of this article is the decisions of the EAEU bodies (the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council, the Eurasian Economic Commission), as well as international customs as sources of legal regulation of integration relations in the EAEU. Separately noted is the status of the decisions of the Customs Union Commission in the current legal order of the EAEU; the importance of the recommendations of the Eurasian Economic Commission, which have a guiding effect on the behavior of subjects of integration legal relations. It is indicated that universal international customs (in the form of principles), as well as regional, local customs, which can be formed directly in the integration association, are applied to the regulation of integration relations. The article shows the role of court decisions in regulating integration relations. The courts of integration associations have a special goal associated with ensuring uniform interpretation and application of integration law. In exercising the function of monitoring compliance by the member states with the Treaty on the Union, the conformity of international treaties within the Union and decisions of the Union bodies with the Treaty on the EAEU, as well as ensuring uniform application of the Union law, the EAEU Court acts to ensure the rights and interests of an indefinite group of persons, member states and the Union as a whole. In conclusion, the article notes the importance of the acts of the EAEU Court in the formation of a single legal space within the Union, filling gaps in legal regulation, forming legal customs, implementing the principles of integration, developing legal positions that influence rule-making and law enforcement in the EAEU bodies and the Union member states.
21
Starodubtsev, Grigoriy S., and Vladimir V. Chernov. "THE PHENOMENON OF EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION LAW." Vestnik of Kostroma State University 30, no. 3 (2024): 269–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2024-30-3-269-274.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of the article is to comprehensively analyze the definition “The Law of the Eurasian Economic Union” and determine its place in the international law system. Research methods: historical-legal, axiological, functional and contextual approaches of comparative legal method, formal-legal method. The authors consider the genesis of Eurasianism as a historical phenomenon and philosophical direction, analyze the law-forming social factors that form the basis for the Eurasian law development. They conclude that Eurasian integration has traditionally been free and legal and the system of Eurasian law is based on the postulates of both Western and Eastern influences. These are the rule of law, collectivism and the priority of natural relations within the group. The law-forming factors that influenced the creation of the EAEU and its law are peculiar and fundamentally different from the factors and prerequisites characteristic of other integration economic formations. The EAEU was created by the states that had previously been part of a single state; its statutory documents, along with taking into account the peculiarities of European law, also took into account the confessional and civilizational identity of Eurasianism. Formally, at this stage of Eurasian integration, the EAEU law is a sub-branch of international economic law and represents a system of principles and norms in the sphere of international communication of Eurasian states, created to regulate public relations on the creation (liquidation) of regional associations, cooperation of a regional association with other international organizations, its participants and structures in the spheres established by EAEU statutes.
22
Glikman, O. V., and A. U. Nazarova. "International legal framework for energy cooperation between the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union." Journal of Law and Administration 16, no. 1 (2020): 28–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2020-1-54-28-35.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction. Energy cooperation of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union plays a crucial role in the framework of the Eurasian economic integration. The EAEU members set as their goal the creation of common energy markets of the Union by 2025.The legal doctrine comprises different opinions regarding the legal nature of the EAEU and the EAEU law, which is important for the analysis of international legal aspects of the cooperation of the EAEU members in the energy sector, as well as for the formation of the EAEU energy law.The article analyzes the energy provisions of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, the role of national legislation and bilateral international treaties of the EAEU members in the energy sector.Materials and methods. The EAEU legal acts, previous acts of the EurAsEC, the existing bilateral international treaties of the EAEU members in the energy sector, the works of prominent authors affecting Eurasian integration have been used. The research methodology was based on the following theoretical methods of cognition: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy, as well as special methods of cognition of legal phenomena and processes: comparative legal and formal legal.Results. The study summarizes the legal acts of the EAEU in the field of energy of various legal nature, highlights the gaps and weaknesses of the energy provisions of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, identifies differences in the approaches of the EAEU and EurAsEC, analyzes the provisions of the Treaty regarding national legislation and bilateral international treaties of the EAEU members in the field of energy.Discussion and conclusions. The acts of the EAEU law in the field of energy are considered as the EAEU energy law which, as well as the European Union energy law, is a part of the international energy law.The identified gaps and weaknesses in the energy provisions of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union can be used to improve the EAEU energy law.Despite the development of multilateral regulation of energy cooperation through the EAEU legal acts aimed at the formation of common EAEU energy markets the national legislation of the EAEU members remains important in the field of energy and a lot of work will be required to harmonize and unify it. In addition the bilateral international treaties of the EAEU members governing energy cooperation are of great importance.
23
Ryazantsev, Sergey V., Tamara K. Rostovskaya, and Olga A. Zolotareva. "System for Measuring the Socio-Economic Sustainability of the Eurasian Economic Union." Economy of Region 17, no. 3 (2021): 971–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-18.
Full textAbstract:
Whether applying to individual countries or unions, the comparability of statistical indicators and their compliance with contemporary international initiatives is a serious problem. In particular, analysis of the macroeconomic indicators used for assessing the sustainability of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries has shown that they do not reflect the actual situation. In this regard, the creation of a unified system of indicators for determining the socio-economic sustainability of EAEU member states — as well as the EAEU as a whole — becomes an urgent task. Therefore, the present study aims to refine the system for measuring the socio-economic sustainability of the Eurasian space and develop recommendations for the selection of key parameters. By comparing socio-economic sustainability indicators published by international organisations (UNECE, OECD, Eurostat, CIS Statistical Committee) in the context of the development strategies of individual EAEU countries and the Union as a whole, the authors distinguish between basic and extended indicator types. Basic indicators comprise: the annual consolidated budget deficit; general government debt; annualised inflation rate; contribution of high-tech and knowledge-intensive industries to gross domestic product (GDP); contribution of innovative goods and services to total industrial exports; growth index of the proportion of reconstruction and modernisation investment to total capital investment; fertility rate; life expectancy at birth; poverty rate. Extended indicators include: GDP; economic growth; main international trade; external and national balance of payments; social. The applicability and relevance of the proposed system for measuring the socio-economic sustainability of the Eurasian space is confirmed by statistical analysis of EAEU member state data (including correlation analysis). The results showed that the presented system of indicators reflects the actual development of the EAEU countries, contributing to informed decision-making both at the level of the EAEU member states and at the level of the Union as a whole.
24
Ryazantsev, Sergey V., Tamara K. Rostovskaya, and Olga A. Zolotareva. "System for Measuring the Socio-Economic Sustainability of the Eurasian Economic Union." Economy of Region 17, no. 3 (2021): 971–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-18.
Full textAbstract:
Whether applying to individual countries or unions, the comparability of statistical indicators and their compliance with contemporary international initiatives is a serious problem. In particular, analysis of the macroeconomic indicators used for assessing the sustainability of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries has shown that they do not reflect the actual situation. In this regard, the creation of a unified system of indicators for determining the socio-economic sustainability of EAEU member states — as well as the EAEU as a whole — becomes an urgent task. Therefore, the present study aims to refine the system for measuring the socio-economic sustainability of the Eurasian space and develop recommendations for the selection of key parameters. By comparing socio-economic sustainability indicators published by international organisations (UNECE, OECD, Eurostat, CIS Statistical Committee) in the context of the development strategies of individual EAEU countries and the Union as a whole, the authors distinguish between basic and extended indicator types. Basic indicators comprise: the annual consolidated budget deficit; general government debt; annualised inflation rate; contribution of high-tech and knowledge-intensive industries to gross domestic product (GDP); contribution of innovative goods and services to total industrial exports; growth index of the proportion of reconstruction and modernisation investment to total capital investment; fertility rate; life expectancy at birth; poverty rate. Extended indicators include: GDP; economic growth; main international trade; external and national balance of payments; social. The applicability and relevance of the proposed system for measuring the socio-economic sustainability of the Eurasian space is confirmed by statistical analysis of EAEU member state data (including correlation analysis). The results showed that the presented system of indicators reflects the actual development of the EAEU countries, contributing to informed decision-making both at the level of the EAEU member states and at the level of the Union as a whole.
25
Berg, Lyudmila N. "Systematization of the EAEU legal sources in the field of regulation of the service market in science." Economic Consultant 32, no. 4 (2020): 83–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.46224/ecoc.2020.4.8.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction. The law of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter – the EAEU) contains provisions aimed at organizing scientific cooperation (and cooperation in the field of innovation) of its member states. The subject of this research is the totality of sources of the Eurasian Economic Union law in the field of regulation of the services market in science. The purpose of the research is to systematize the legal sources, containing norms governing relations in the services market in the field of scientific activity. Materials and methods. The methodology of scientific research includes the dialectical method, General scientific logical operations (deductions and inductions, analysis and synthesis) and specific scientific methods (legalistic, comparative legal). Results. As a result of the research, the author presents a system of sources of the EAEU law, norms in the field of legal regulation of scientific activities and scientific cooperation within the framework of the Eurasian economic integration: the Treaty on the EAEU, international multilateral and unilateral agreements implemented in the EAEU legal framework, normative acts adopted by the Supreme Economic Council and the EAEU Economic Commission. Conclusion. The research results are applicable in further theoretical studies of the Eurasian economic integration and the EAEU law and have practical significance for the systematization of the legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union, development of legal techniques, EAEU lawmaking.
26
Kurylev, K., D. Malyshev, and D. Stanis. "The Country Dimension of Eurasian Integration in the CIS Space." World Economy and International Relations 66, no. 1 (2022): 119–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-1-119-128.
Full textAbstract:
The article describes the integration processes that developed in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in the 2000s, which culminated in the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The purpose of the article is to determine the main directions of the EAEU development through the prism of country preferences of the participants of this integration association: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia. The specifics of the involvement of these countries in the Eurasian integration processes in the CIS help to understand better the scale of the EAEU’s activities, its specifics, which is important for determining both the prospects for the development of the EAEU and the country dimension of Eurasian integration. The formation of the EAEU was preceded by the formation of the Customs Union (CU) and the Common Economic Space (CES), which generally corresponded to the algorithm that was present in world practice when creating large integration associations. The locomotives of the Eurasian integration process were initially Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus, which demonstrated the highest level of economic and political interaction in the CIS. In conclusion, the main prospects for the country development of the EAEU and Eurasian integration in general are shown. The EAEU promises certain benefits to the states that are part of such an association. In addition, there is a certain political context here – as a result of closer integration, the EAEU states will become less susceptible to crises and the emergence of conflict situations. Like any integration association, the EAEU faces many problems and challenges, both external and internal. It is not always possible to overcome them completely, but the countries-members of the Union are making significant efforts to this, which in the future should give positive results in strengthening this integration project in Eurasia.
27
Bazavluk, Sergei V., Konstantin P. Kurylev, and Leonid V. Savin. "Eurasianism, Eurasian Economic Union and Multipolarity: Assessments of Foreign Experts." Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 22, no. 1 (2022): 30–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-1-30-42.
Full textAbstract:
Eurasianism, in its various interpretations, from ideology to the implementation of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) programs, is regarded as one of the strategies of creating a multipolar world order. This article analyzes the views and assessments of foreign authors regarding the relationship between Eurasianism and the EAEU amid the changing international context. The authors present both critical and positive opinions on Eurasianism, Eurasian integration and its political and economic interlinkages with other countries and associations (China, Vietnam, the European Union (EU), Latin America). Thus, we identify three main lines of assessments on Eurasianism and Eurasian integration. The first includes negative assessments ranging from characterizing Eurasianism and the EAEU as a threat to the EU, the US, and the West in general to deliberate misinformation about the Eurasian ideology, for instance, denoting Eurasianism as parafascism. The second comprises more pragmatic and balanced views, with an emphasis on economic cooperation, which may imply cooperation with the EAEU and acceptance of the Eurasian integration if specific conditions are met, or cessation of such cooperation. The third group includes positive assessments and emphasizes the need for more intensive interaction between the EAEU and the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. Such views are generally held by Russian and Chinese authors. Non-Russian conceptions of Eurasianism that gained popularity in Turkey or Kazakhstan are ideologically close to the classic Eurasianism and the EAEU, although these conceptions take a distinctive national shape. The article provides some examples of interregional cooperation promoted by the EAEU within the BRICS under the outreach model, i.e., adding new dimensions to existing cooperation formats. The authors arrive at a conclusion that most often the assessments of Eurasian integration and cooperation proposals by foreign experts are tied to Russian foreign policy (or experts opinion of it). They often find interconnections between EAEU, Eurasianism and Russian policy, which emphasize Russian identity as a marker of distinctive civilization. The article also notes comments of Russian authors on the EAEU - EU relations. The research is based on comparative analysis of analytical and research publications on the subject.
28
Bazavluk, Sergei V., Konstantin P. Kurylev, and Leonid V. Savin. "Eurasianism, Eurasian Economic Union and Multipolarity: Assessments of Foreign Experts." Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 22, no. 1 (2022): 30–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-1-30-42.
Full textAbstract:
Eurasianism, in its various interpretations, from ideology to the implementation of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) programs, is regarded as one of the strategies of creating a multipolar world order. This article analyzes the views and assessments of foreign authors regarding the relationship between Eurasianism and the EAEU amid the changing international context. The authors present both critical and positive opinions on Eurasianism, Eurasian integration and its political and economic interlinkages with other countries and associations (China, Vietnam, the European Union (EU), Latin America). Thus, we identify three main lines of assessments on Eurasianism and Eurasian integration. The first includes negative assessments ranging from characterizing Eurasianism and the EAEU as a threat to the EU, the US, and the West in general to deliberate misinformation about the Eurasian ideology, for instance, denoting Eurasianism as parafascism. The second comprises more pragmatic and balanced views, with an emphasis on economic cooperation, which may imply cooperation with the EAEU and acceptance of the Eurasian integration if specific conditions are met, or cessation of such cooperation. The third group includes positive assessments and emphasizes the need for more intensive interaction between the EAEU and the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. Such views are generally held by Russian and Chinese authors. Non-Russian conceptions of Eurasianism that gained popularity in Turkey or Kazakhstan are ideologically close to the classic Eurasianism and the EAEU, although these conceptions take a distinctive national shape. The article provides some examples of interregional cooperation promoted by the EAEU within the BRICS under the outreach model, i.e., adding new dimensions to existing cooperation formats. The authors arrive at a conclusion that most often the assessments of Eurasian integration and cooperation proposals by foreign experts are tied to Russian foreign policy (or experts opinion of it). They often find interconnections between EAEU, Eurasianism and Russian policy, which emphasize Russian identity as a marker of distinctive civilization. The article also notes comments of Russian authors on the EAEU - EU relations. The research is based on comparative analysis of analytical and research publications on the subject.
29
Kembayev, Zhenis. "The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: An Adequate Body for Facilitating Eurasian Integration?" Review of Central and East European Law 41, no. 3-4 (2016): 342–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04103004.
Full textAbstract:
This article examines the structure and competences of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union (eaeu Court). In doing so, it provides a comparative analysis of the eaeu Court with other judicial bodies created in the post-Soviet area, the Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community (Community Court), as well as in some respects with the Court of Justice of the European Union (cjeu). Summarizing major problems of the eaeu Court and setting out the Court’s first case, the article argues that the rules governing the activities of the eaeu Court represent a significant setback against the progress achieved previously by the Community Court. This setback reflects the lack of political will of the eaeu members to transform the eaeu Court into an effective judicial body similar to the cjeu and their insufficient commitment to the rule of law.
30
Vinokurov, Evgeny. "Eurasian Economic Union: Current state and preliminary results." Russian Journal of Economics 3, no. (1) (2017): 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.02.004.
Full textAbstract:
This paper assesses the current results of the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). On the one hand, the EAEU has not been an impeccable "success story". The EAEU's progress has slowed after initial rapid progress. On the other hand, it has achieved much. The EAEU is best viewed not as an exception to general rules of regional economic integration, but rather as a functioning customs union with its own successes and stumbling blocks, enriched by several additional quite developed areas of economic integration. This paper reviews the state of Eurasian institutions, the single market for goods and services, the state of mutual trade and investment flows among member states, ongoing work to eliminate non-tariff barriers, problems pertaining to the efficient coordination of macroeconomic policies, progress toward establishing an EAEU network of free trade areas, the state of the common labor market, and the dynamics of public opinion relative to Eurasian integration in the five member states.
31
Komov, M. S. "The Eurasian Economic Union: on the «Strategy-2025» and on the transport and logistics component of the document`s issues." Russian Economic Journal, no. 3 (July 12, 2021): 123–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.33983/0130-9757-2021-3-123-128.
Full textAbstract:
The article briefly describes the content of the new conceptual and programmatic perspective document of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) –«Strategic directions for the development of the Eurasian economic integration until 2025» («Strategy-2025»). The transport and logistics component of the document`s problems is commented on in more detail. In the course of these comments, proposals are substantiated to modify the legal framework of the EAEU in the aspect of strengthening the institutional regulation of transport integration of the participating countries on the basis of expanding the functional powers of regulators (subjects of the unified interstate regulatory system), including the Eurasian Economic Commission (EAEC) and its departments.
32
MURSALOVA, Khalima N., Bakytgul A. AINAKANOVA, Aigul S. KAZKENOVA, Nurgul ZHALELKANOVA, and Ozay OZPENCE. "Analysis of Problems of Kazakhstan’s Economic Integration in the EAEU." Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 11, no. 4 (2020): 1218. http://dx.doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v11.4(50).18.
Full textAbstract:
At the present stage, to ensure economic security at different levels (both national and regional), for economic growth and sustainable development, one of the important factors is integration processes. At present, integration unions, which include several member states, are acting quite effectively. One of such unions is the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), in comparison other integration unions such as the EU (European Union), the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and some other, EAEU is quite young. However, this union of countries can be called one of the dynamically developing, and nevertheless, in the interaction within the union, a certain imbalance between the member states can be noted, which can be called a serious internal challenge for the EAEU. It is worth noting the economic context of the imbalances in the Union: there is no correlation in macroeconomic indicators (for the majority) between the countries – members of the Union. One of the leading participants in the Eurasian Economic Union, as well as one of the founders is Kazakhstan. It was with at the behest of Kazakhstan that the implementation of this union began. But, after 5.5 years of the functioning of this integration association, the effectiveness of this association gives rise to certain disputes, especially the effectiveness of the union, which calls into question the advisability of Kazakhstan in the composition of this union. The purpose of the article is to analyze the problems of economic integration of Kazakhstan in the Eurasian Economic Union and the possibility of solving them. In the framework of the study of the problem, a scientific approach was used using general scientific methods that were also special, in particular, systematization, theoretical generalization and the method of comparison with the use of statistical analysis. The study defines the concept of integration, reveals the understanding of economic integration from the perspective of different economic schools, using various approaches to understanding this category, defines forms of economic integration and factors defining the integration process, gives a brief disclosure of the essence of the Eurasian Economic Union. The participation of Kazakhstan in the EAEU relative to other participating countries is considered and the main problems are identified, some prospects for Kazakhstan’s participation in the EAEU are considered. The prospects for further research are due to further study of the EAEU problems with respect to the participating countries, for their subsequent study and search for solutions. The instrumental value of the material lies in the possibility of studying problematic issues for further sustainable and effective interaction.
33
Bukalerova, Liudmila, and Ilya Kaminskiy. "Development Propsects of the Eurasian Economic Union as a Regional Integrational Organization." Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, no. 3 (June 2022): 271–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2022.3.19.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction. It has been almost thirty years since the idea of forming Eurasian space was voiced and seven years since that idea was embodied in the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Despite the acknowledgment of the EAEU importance and the recognition of the need of its further development by its member states, the organisation’s future is still in question. For instance, an increase in barriers has been observed, despite the fact that at the very beginning in 2015 when the EAEU was established, a gradual creation of the Eurasian customs union without exceptions and restrictions was proclaimed as one of its principles. Internal problems emerging between the EAEU member states considerably slow down the EAEU activity both within the EAEU and with its partners, and require a discussion of a broader agenda that goes beyond the economic sphere. In this regard, the authors set the goal of researching approaches to further development of the Eurasian economic integration as well as the harmonization of the EAEU member states in socio-cultural area. During the research, the authors used methods of scientific cognition, consistency, analysis and legal comparison. In order to examine the EAEU bodies’ development the authors also used legal research. Results. The authors’ position substantiated in the work is based on the history of the development of Eurasian economic integration, the influence of foreign policy, internal factors and soft power carried out by the neighboring countries of the region in various socioeconomic spheres. Conclusions. As a result of the research, the authors come to the conclusion that it is necessary to restore and deepen cultural and historical ties between the participants of the Eurasian Economic Union, as a separate area of activity of the Eurasian Economic Commission.
34
Mišević, Petar. "International trade of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)." Ekonomski vjesnik 34, no. 1 (2021): 187–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.51680/ev.34.1.14.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose: The main purpose of this research is to analyse the international trade of the EAEU member states. Methodology: The paper is based on the use of indicators such as the trade balance, intra-industry trade, import content of exports, trade openness, and the share of exports in GDP. Results: The results show openness to foreign trade and export orientation of the EAEU member states. Conclusion: The conclusion is that international trade, the rapid growth of export, and trade openness differ significantly between the EAEU member states.
35
Barykin, S. E., Yu B. Egereva, E. V. Korchagina, O. V. Kalinina, and E. S. Fedorova. "The largest international digital logistics platforms: comparative analysis." Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity 7, no. 1 (2022): 97–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2022-7-1-97-103.
Full textAbstract:
Taking these prospects into account, the integration potential of Russia in the conditions of gradual trade and economic unity of the ASEAN countries can be considered in the aspect of formation of new strategic opportunities for interaction with the integration environment of Eurasia on the basis of investments in infrastructure development within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The advantages and disadvantages of the digital platforms and the characteristic features of international DLPs are highlighted. Based on the analysis, the necessity of developing an international digital platform in the EAEU is justified in the context of the development of international digital logistics platforms within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union.
36
Lyudmila, N. Berg. "Systematization of the EAEU legal sources in the field of regulation of the service market in science." Economic Consultant 32, no. 4 (2020): 83–93. https://doi.org/10.46224/ecoc.2020.4.8.
Full textAbstract:
<strong><em>Introduction. </em></strong>The law of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter – the EAEU) contains provisions aimed at organizing scientific cooperation (and cooperation in the field of innovation) of its member states. The subject of this research is the totality of sources of the Eurasian Economic Union law in the field of regulation of the services market in science. The purpose of the research is to systematize the legal sources, containing norms governing relations in the services market in the field of scientific activity. <strong><em>Materials and methods.</em></strong> The methodology of scientific research includes the dialectical method, General scientific logical operations (deductions and inductions, analysis and synthesis) and specific scientific methods (legalistic, comparative legal). <strong><em>Results. </em></strong>As a result of the research, the author presents a system of sources of the EAEU law, norms in the field of legal regulation of scientific activities and scientific cooperation within the framework of the Eurasian economic integration: the Treaty on the EAEU, international multilateral and unilateral agreements implemented in the EAEU legal framework, normative acts adopted by the Supreme Economic Council and the EAEU Economic Commission. <strong><em>Conclusion. </em></strong>The research results are applicable in further theoretical studies of the Eurasian economic integration and the EAEU law and have practical significance for the systematization of the legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union, development of legal techniques, EAEU lawmaking.
37
Kinyakin, Andrey A., and Svetlana Kucheriavaia. "The European Union vs. the Eurasian Economic Union: “integration race 2.0”?" Przegląd europejski 3 (November 19, 2019): 135–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.5846.
Full textAbstract:
One of the most remarkable features of regional development in Eurasia is the competition between the European Union (EU) and Russia within the so called “contested neighborhood”, e.g. the post-Soviet space. Originated in the 1990s it gained the special momentum in 2000s after the beginning of the Russia-led “Eurasian integration process”, leading to the creation of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in 2015. That fact brought the competition between the EU and Russia to the new level, e.g. the “integration race”, which had the strong impact on the whole post-Soviet space. The most obvious outcome of that process is the outburst of the Ukrainian crisis in 2013, which on the one hand contributed to further exacerbation of the EU-Russia relations, on the other – it paved the way to elaboration of the new forms and tools of the integration activities. However, it failed to bring the “integration race” between the EU and the Russia-led EAEU to the standstill. Being in the latent “crystallisation” phase, this process goes further with the covert competition between the integration blocks. Its actors are not only the non-aligned post-Soviet states, but also the existing members of the integration structures. All the mentioned above factors makes the “new edition” of the “integration race” rather dangerous because further acceleration of such a competition can lead to the large-scale rivalry between the EU and the EAEU, which may cause unpredictable consequences.
38
Стародубцев, Григорий, Grigoriy Starodubtsyev, Анна Илюшкина, and Anna Ilyushkina. "THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSONALITY OF THE EAEU." Advances in Law Studies 4, no. 1 (2016): 54–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/18072.
Full textAbstract:
This article analyzes the international legal personality of
 the Eurasian Economic Union. The conditions of the Eurasian integration,
 the basic stages of formation and the perspectives of development
 of Eurasian Economic Union are described in the article.
39
Капустин, Анатолий, and Anatoliy Kapustin. "The Treaty of the Eurasian Economic Union – New Page of Legal Development of Eurasian Integration." Journal of Russian Law 2, no. 12 (2014): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/6623.
Full textAbstract:
The article is considered the principal features of the Treaty on Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in the light of modern International law, its legal nature, place and functions in the regulation of Eurasian integration. Analysing the history of the formation of the idea of Eurasian integration after the collapse of the USSR, the value of the EurAsEC in the development of the integration process. Describes the main features of the EAEU Treaty as the foundation treaty of two kinds: establishing international organization for integration (EAEU) and the economic and legal space (the Customs Union and the Common economic space).
40
Vorona, Anastasiуa, Lyudmila Kopteva, and Anna Trushevskaya. "The Eurasian economic union: trends and prospects for development in digital economy." E3S Web of Conferences 210 (2020): 13025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021013025.
Full textAbstract:
Currently the Eurasian Economic Union defines its main tasks as the creation of an image of the significant center for the development of international trade, enhancement of mutually beneficial partnership with member states and other countries, the creation of new formats for international cooperation. At the present days the Eurasian Economic Union is filled with real economic content. Multilateral projects are being implemented, primarily in key sectors of the economy, that are energy and transport. In the long run, the formation of a monetary union is possible. Development of currency integration, as a component of economic unity, presupposes the process of implementing a coordinated policy of the EAEU countries, as well as the creation and functioning of the organizations performing interstate currency regulation. In the article the dynamics of the main economic indicators of the Eurasian Economic Union functioning is considered. The data on the trade turnover of the EAEU member countries for 2019 is provided. The main directions of EAEU cooperation with third countries and integration associations are revealed, with particular attention being paid to the creation of free trade zones with Vietnam and Singapore. In the context of the organization and functioning of interstate unions, each of the member states of such unions, while ensuring their own security, also needs to manage both the threats to the security of other partners that have an indirect adverse effect and the threats that directly impact the whole union. The directions of digital transformation of the economies of the Eurasian Economic Union member states are considered. The problematic aspects of its functioning are highlighted.
41
Moroz, Elena Nikolaevna. "Comparative analysis of the integration groupings of the EU and the EAEU." Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations, no. 2 (February 2022): 39–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0633.2022.2.37348.
Full textAbstract:
The scientific article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of integration associations of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. The methodological basis of the research is an interdisciplinary approach, system analysis and comparative method. The purpose of the study is to identify the differences between the integration processes of the EU and the EAEU and compare their effectiveness. The author defines integration, examines in detail the features of integration processes in Europe and Eurasia, compares the economic indicators of selected integration associations. The study pays special attention to the historical prerequisites for the formation of the Eurasian Economic and European Unions, as well as the gradual construction of these integration groupings, taking into account the impact on modernity. The novelty of the research lies in the author's understanding of the effectiveness of integration processes in the EU and the EAEU based on the analysis of macroeconomic indicators, identifying the strengths and weaknesses of associations, their comparative analysis, as well as in developing proposals to eliminate the identified problems of Eurasian integration. The main conclusions of the study are: the EU remains an effective integration association, whose successful experience has become an example for the creation of the EAEU. However, now the EU has reached the ceiling of growth, which has not yet been broken. The effectiveness of the Eurasian integration processes remains low, and economic achievements should be expected from the EAEU, as a young structure, no earlier than in 10-20 years.
42
Mursalova, H. N., L. K. Baimagambetova, and O. Ozpence. "Assessment of the Eurasian Economic Union countries integration economic efficiency." Central Asian Economic Review, no. 3 (August 15, 2021): 6–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.52821/2224-5561-2021-3-6-19.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the achieved level of integration of the leading countries within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).Methodology: a quantitative approach is used. Based on the results of the analysis of dynamic series, the mutual openness of country economies and their mutual trade is estimated by the methods of calculating the export quota, which shows the content of exports in the volume of gross product. A broader analysis of integration interaction involves the study of other equally important indicators. Thus, the indicators of the importance of mutual trade in goods and services, mutual labor migration for the leading countries of the Eurasian Economic Union and mutual flows of foreign direct investment for Kazakhstan within all the countries of the EAEU were also used and mutual FDI flows for Kazakhstan within all EAEU countries were also used.The originality / value of the study lies in the coverage of the last years of the Eurasian integration, the calculation of indicators of the significance and evaluation of the effectiveness of foreign economic relations in their main areas in the Eurasian integration grouping for its leading countries.The results of the study – in 2015-2019, there is an achievement of relative openness and an increase in the importance of trade in goods and services, a decrease in the importance of migration between Kazakhstan and the main participants of the EAEU. At the same time, the flows of foreign direct investment to and from Kazakhstan within the union are characterized by positive changes.
43
Bratchik, Alina S. "TRADE AND ECONOMIC COOPERATION BETWEEN THE EAEU AND AFRICA. CURRENT SITUATION AND PROSPECTS." RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Eurasian Studies. History. Political Science. International Relations, no. 4 (2024): 97–115. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7648-2024-4-97-115.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with the history of trade and economic relations of the Eurasian Economic Union with the countries of the African Union. The EAEU is developing cooperation with Africa within the framework of the “Strategy for the Development of Integration until 2025”. African states with rich natural and human resources are in search of new partners in Eurasia, with the help of which they could reduce the dependence of local markets on European countries. Interaction has intensified since the signing of the “Memorandum of Understanding between the Eurasian Economic Commission and the African Union Commission” during the first RussiaAfrica summit in 2019. However, to date, the legal and regulatory framework for Eurasian-African cooperation remains underdeveloped. The existing memorandums function only with the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) and Morocco. The Eurasian Economic Commission’s contacts with African integration associations are hampered by trade restrictions. From 2017 to 2023, trade turnover between the EAEU and Africa grew to $137.8 billion. But it is still a low figure. Africa’s share in the total trade turnover of the Eurasian Economic Union is only 3%, with Russia accounting for a large share of exports and imports. The author believes that in order to overcome the current situation, it is necessary to work out trade agreements and provided within their framework “action plans” with African countries and integration associations, increase the number of joint field meetings, expand the range of products supplied, develop investment flows and stimulate interest in cooperation with Africa among all EAEU countries. Such measures will simplify the access of products manufactured in the EAEU countries to African markets, eliminate tariff and non-tariff barriers, increase trade turnover between the two continents, create new jobs and implement infrastructure projects in Africa.
44
Kamalyan, A., L. Tsybul’nik, and A. Pak. "Industrial Policy of Eurasian Economic Union." World Economy and International Relations 66, no. 11 (2022): 28–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-11-28-40.
Full textAbstract:
The necessity to establish a consistent and sensibly planned industrial policy at the level of regional integration associations (RIAs) is justified in terms of the modern global structural changes as well as due to the growing number of protectionist measures applied by particular states and regional integration associations regarding the field of imported industrial goods (e.g., the EU carbon tax, trade wars, and restrictions due to economic sanctions). Despite the fact that both Russian and foreign literature pay full attention to the State industrial policy shaping and implementation issues, although, the conceptual theoretical grounds of the industrial policy shaping and implementation within RIAs are missing and are poorly researched. Based on the review of theoretical knowledges article proposes a conceptual approach to the RIAs industrial policy implementation in the context of the State industrial policy shaping. The article identifies features and restrictions hampering implementation process as well as determines proper conceptual definition of specific terms. For instance, the RIAs industrial policy consists of the complex of regulatory instruments at supranational level which have both stimulating and coordinating nature as well as national regulatory system with the aim of harmonizing the development of member countries’ industrial capacities, with the involvement of supranational institutions. Also, it is to be noted that the main feature of the RIAs industrial policy is its coordinating and stimulating nature. Using the example of Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter, the EAEU) the approach to its industrial policy development has been developed. Based on the analysis of particular macroeconomic indicators of the EAEU Member States, their industrial development priorities, comparison of those priorities with the global trends, the following EAEU industrial strategic priorities have been identified: assisting in promotion of commodities to foreign markets, encouraging innovation activities, increasing investment attractiveness, developing small- and medium-sized businesses, environment protection, and digital transformation. The general development trajectories of industrial development which has been highlighted in the article as well as the proposed coordinating and stimulating supranational regulation measures can be a solid fundament for achieving development objectives of the EAEU Member States and play a catalyst role in transforming their economies.
45
Dononbaeva, A. A. "FORMATION OF CUSTOMS UNION AND HIS PROSPECT." Herald of KSUCTA n a N Isanov, no. 2-2021 (June 24, 2021): 282–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.35803/1694-5298.2021.2.282-285.
Full textAbstract:
The article explores the theoretical and practical aspects of the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union, independent states delegated part of their powers to the regulatory body - the Eurasian Economic Commission, in order to ensure four freedoms and pursue coordinated policies in key sectors of the economy in common interests. The Eurasian Economic Union is an international organization for regional economic integration with international legal personality, established by the Treaty on the EAEU. One of the priorities of the integration interaction of the EAEU states is the formation of a common financial market, which will ensure the improvement of business development.
46
Maslova, Vlada, Natalya Zaruk, Clemens Fuchs, and Mikhail Avdeev. "Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in the Eurasian Economic Union." Agriculture 9, no. 3 (2019): 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9030061.
Full textAbstract:
This article discusses the outcomes of a quantitative analysis using econometric panel data models of the competitiveness of grains in the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The analysis was based on the public authorities’ statistics of EAEU countries as well as the United Nations Comtrade Database, which is a repository of official international trade statistics. The results of the analysis allowed us to assess the level of competitiveness of the agricultural products produced in EAEU countries and to determine the extent to which various factors affect the competitiveness. The research conclusions can be used to develop and adjust the agricultural policy in the EAEU.
47
Myasnikovich, M. V., and V. S. Kovalev. "The Eurasian Economic Union: Rethinking the Sovereign Path of Development." EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics 16, no. 2 (2022): 11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-02-11-17.
Full textAbstract:
Aim. To reveal the main areas of work of the Eurasian Economic Commission and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in the near future.Tasks. Assess the processes of Eurasian integration both in a retrospective context and in terms of current geopolitical and geo-economic events.Methods. Statistical, comparative analysis, qualitative assessment, system approach, project approach.Results. The contours of the further development of the EAEU are outlined with an emphasis on the creation of a sovereign economic model, the improvement of the institutional and legal systems of the Union, and mutually beneficial cooperation with stable international partners.Conclusions. The history of the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union is connected with the successful overcoming of external and internal challenges, which clearly indicates its viability. In the current conditions, the EAEU needs to rethink the sovereign path of development, make adjustments to the logic and mechanisms for improving integration work, use the basic conditions to strengthen its own self-sufficiency.
48
Neshataeva, Vasilisa O. "The Eurasian Economic Union is 10 Years Old." Rossijskoe pravosudie, no. 5 (April 24, 2025): 107–12. https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2025.5.107-112.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the review of the history of the development of Eurasian integration and the tenth anniversary of the EAEU. A historical excursion is conducted from 1991 to the current stage of integration in the Eurasian space. It is concluded that due to the elimination of many trade and administrative barriers, a high degree of freedom of movement of goods has been ensured, and uniform standards have been developed in many areas. The article also notes that the wide scope of international legal regulation and the already formed extensive legal framework for Eurasian integration require not only in-depth study, but also skillful application of complex international-national polysystem complexes created by a supranational integration organization – the EAEU. In this context, the timeliness of solving the problems of training specialists in the field of EAEU law is emphasized, and a brief overview of what has been achieved in this area is given.
49
Margaritou, K. "EAEU Policies and Governance – The Future of Eurasian Integration." Russia and New States of Eurasia, no. 1 (2021): 23–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2021-1-23-42.
Full textAbstract:
The article evaluates policies and governance of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and validates the future of Eurasian integration. In order to avoid volatility of quantitative indicators and externalities that may lead to uncertain predictions, the means for this task include: Firstly, a qualitative analysis of EAEU constituents, namely of Customs Union (CU) and Common Economic Space (CES) policies, as well as of the functions of Union’s bodies in accordance respectively with theories of economic integration and theoretical approaches on state sector’s effective operation. Secondly, the strategic dimension of collaboration of EAEU member states in other Eurasian organizations and associations, such as the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the Greater Eurasian Partnership (GEP), in relation with Russian grand strategy and its dynamics on global order.
50
Орлов and Igor Orlov. "CUSTOMS DUTIES IN THE CUSTOMS UNION OF EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION." Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences 10, no. 4 (2015): 133–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/11963.
Full textAbstract:
This article presents a comparative analysis of customs duties as a form of customs fees levied in the states - members of the Customs Union Eurasian economic union. Based on the analysis, the suppositions about the reasons for the differences in the bases and the number of customs duties in the states - members of the Customs Union EAEU are made. The author states his position on the need for an unambiguous interpretation of the definition of «customs duties», which will eventually allow to set common types of customs duties in the national legislation of each Member State of the Customs Union EAEU.