Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Eurocode 3 / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Eurocode 3.

Journal articles on the topic 'Eurocode 3'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Eurocode 3.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Sánduly, Annabella, Anett Tóth, and Barnabás-Attila Lőrincz. "The Missing Holistic Approach in Design Application of Eurocode 3." Műszaki Tudományos Közlemények 11, no. 1 (October 1, 2019): 171–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.33894/mtk-2019.11.38.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Steel Eurocodes have an important role in the correct and adequate design of steel structures. Most of the programs, which are used for the static analysis of these structures take into consideration the information offered by the Eurocodes, thus giving the opportunity to entrust them with the task of solving those problems which are not clear and easily understandable for the user. As will be proven in this article, Eurocode 3 in some cases does not offer proper, clear explanations regarding some decisions. The main criticism for the whole Eurocode package is that the user might not see clearly the connection between the scattered parts of the final solution.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Stachura, Zbigniew, and Marian A. Gizejowski. "Buckling resistance evaluation of steel beam-columns using refined General Method approach." MATEC Web of Conferences 262 (2019): 09010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926209010.

Full text

Abstract:

Different aspects of Eurocode 3 General Method (GM) approaches are discussed in this paper. The purpose of present study is to improve the application of GM approach for both beam-columns without intermediate lateral-torsional restraints and with these restraints. The results from the proposed GM are compared with those from Eurocode 3-1-1 interaction equations according to Method 1 and Method 2. A better consistency between the developed GM approach and the Eurocode's interaction equation approach than Eurocode 3 GM approach is observed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Giżejowski, Marian, and Zbigniew Stachura. "A Consistent Ayrton-Perry Approach for the Flexural-Torsional Buckling Resistance Evaluation of Steel I-Section Members." Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 25, no. 2 (June 1, 2017): 89–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ceer-2017-0022.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Steel I-section members subjected to compression a monoaxial bending about the major axis are dealt with in this paper. The current Eurocode’s design procedure of such members is based on a set of two interpolation equations. In this paper a simple and yet consistent Ayrton-Perry methodology is presented that for beam-columns yields the Ayrton-Perry design strategy similar to that utilized in the steel Eurocodes for design of beams and columns but not used so far for the beam-column design. The results from developed design criterion are compared with those of Method 1 of Eurocode 3 and the Ayrton-Perry formulation of a different format that has been recently published.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

TRAVUSH, Vladimir, and Yuri VOLKOV. "APPLICATION ISSUES OF EUROCODES IN BUILDING DESIGN IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION." Bulletin of Science and Research Center “Stroitelstvo”, no. 3 (30) (August 31, 2021): 117–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2021-3(30)-117-123.

Full text

Abstract:

With the development and simplification of The article describes the application of European norms in the domestic practice for the design of reinforced concrete structures using European norms Eurocode-2. For Eurocode-2, the number of nationally defined parameters is more than a hundred. These are different coefficients, shrinkage, creep of concrete, thickness of protective layers of concrete for steel fittings depending on the type, environment of operation, etc. Differ in the SNIP on the design of designs and individual Eurocodes, the size and shape of the samples tested to determine the strength (regulatory) characteristics of building materials, making it impossible to apply many of the calculation formulas directly. Addressing these issues is a rather capacious task. Many series of prototypes will be required only to determine statistically reliable transitional coefficients for the strength of the materials used in SNIP and Eurocodes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Gent, Dave, and Anton Ianakiev. "Assessing riveted connections to Eurocode 3." Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering History and Heritage 170, no. 2 (May 2017): 87–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jenhh.17.00002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Byfield, M. P., and D. A. Nethercot. "A new look at Eurocode 3." Engineering Structures 19, no. 9 (September 1997): 780–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(96)00152-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Euler, Mathias, and Ulrike Kuhlmann. "Ermüdungsnachweis für Kranbahnträger nach Eurocode 3." Stahlbau 88, S1 (November 2019): 74–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.201900093.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Kishi, N., R. Hasan, W. F. Chen, and Y. Goto. "Study of Eurocode 3 steel connection classification." Engineering Structures 19, no. 9 (September 1997): 772–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(96)00151-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Sedlacek, Gerhard, and Christian Müller. "Zur Vereinheitlichung der Stabilitätsregeln im Eurocode 3." Stahlbau 73, no. 9 (September 2004): 733–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.200490177.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Kuhlmann, Ulrike, Christina Schmidt‐Rasche, Fabian Jörg, Vahid Pourostad, Jennifer Spiegler, and Mathias Euler. "Update on the revision of Eurocode 3." Steel Construction 14, no. 1 (January 29, 2021): 2–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stco.202000048.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Maquoi, R., and V. de Ville de Goyet. "Some tracks for possible improvement and implementation of Eurocode 3 (Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung und Vollendung des Eurocodes 3)." Stahlbau 68, no. 11 (November 1999): 880–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.199903130.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Toric, Neno, Rui Rui Sun, and Ian W. Burgess. "Creep-free fire analysis of steel structures with Eurocode 3 material model." Journal of Structural Fire Engineering 7, no. 3 (September 12, 2016): 234–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jsfe-09-2016-016.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose This paper aims to propose a methodology to remove inherent implicit creep from the Eurocode 3 material model for steel and to present a creep-free analysis on simply supported steel members. Design/methodology/approach Most of the available material models of steel are based on transient coupon tests, which inherently include creep strain associated with particular heating rates and load ratios. Findings The creep-free analysis aims to reveal the influence of implicit creep by investigating the behaviour of simply supported steel beams and columns exposed to various heating regimes. The paper further evaluates the implicit consideration of creep in the Eurocode 3 steel material model. Originality/value A modified Eurocode 3 carbon steel material model for creep-free analysis is proposed for general structural fire engineering analysis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Naumes, Johannes, Isabel Strohmann, Dieter Ungermann, and Gerhard Sedlacek. "Die neuen Stabilitätsnachweise im Stahlbau nach Eurocode 3." Stahlbau 77, no. 10 (October 2008): 748–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.200810090.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Šapalas, Vaidotas, and Gintas Šaučiuvėnas. "THE STABILITY OF BUILT-UP AXIAL LOADED COLUMN IN LIGHT OF STR AND EC3." Engineering Structures and Technologies 3, no. 4 (December 31, 2011): 150–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/skt.2011.17.

Full text

Abstract:

Straipsnyje pateikta plieninių spragotinio skerspjūvio kolonų laikomųjų galių, apskaičiuotų vadovaujantis Lietuvoje galiojančių plieninių konstrukcijų projektavimo normų STR 2.05.08:2005 ir Eurokodo 3 nuostatomis, lyginamoji analizė. Skaičiavimai buvo atliekami vienodomis pradinėmis sąlygomis, tik naudoti skirtingi skaičiavimo metodai. Kai kuriais atvejais gautieji rezultatai yra labai prieštaringi ir reikalingi išsamesnės analizės ar eksperimentinių tyrimų. The paper presents the analysis of built-up laced axially loaded steel columns in light of Eurocode 3 and Lithuanian design code STR 2.05.08:2005. The theoretical part analyzes two design methods. Some cases indicate principal differences. According to STR, axial forces are equally divided into two parts for both chords. However, in Eurocode 3, axial force (formula 8) for one chord increases due to the additional bending moment (Formula 6) that depends on the shear stiffness of lacings (Formula 5). For very slender columns, the axial force of one chord, considering Eurocode 3, is 2.7 times bigger than that taking into account the STR method. Another big difference between the methods is that according to Eurocode 3 it is not necessary to check the overall stability of the built-up member round the z-z axis (only checking the stability of one chord round the z1-z1 axis is obligatory). Both methods require checking the stability of one chord round the y-y axis. In two cases, calculations referred to the same initial data (Table 1, 2) applying different design codes. The obtained results are presented in the diagrams. The first case shows that column slenderness in both planes equals λy = λz. The axially loaded column calculated with reference to the STR method has bigger bearing capacity reserve than that calculated considering the Eurocode 3 method. In this case, the stability of one chord round the y-y axis (Fig. 3) is the most dangerous. This example illustrates that the stability condition of the axially loaded column according to Eurocode 3 is not satisfied; thus, a necessity of increasing the column cross-section arises. The main reason for the latter situation is a different method used for calculating the axial force of one chord. This difference is greater for more slender columns. In the second case - column slenderness makes λy = λz/2. When slenderness is λz ≤ 100, the axially loaded column calculated according to the STR method has similar results compared to the Eurocode 3 method (Fig. 10). The most dangerous according to STR is the stability of the entire column round the z-z axis (Fig. 8), whereas in accordance with Eurocode 3 it appears to be the stability of one chord round the y-y axis (Fig. 9). In such a case, the stability condition of the axially loaded column according to Eurocode 3 has more reserve only when slenderness is λz > 100 (Fig. 10). Therefore, calculation according to Eurocode 3 is less safe if compared to the STR method. The main reason is that Eurocode 3 does not require checking the entire column stability round the z-z axis. Hence, for calculating slender columns according to Eurocode 3, some cases (λz > 100) are not very safe, which was also noticed in the numerical investigations provided by other authors Kalochairetis (2011). In some cases, results are controversial, and therefore it is necessary to perform additional analysis or experimental investigation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Niessner, M., and T. Seeger. "Fatigue strength of structural steel with powder actuated fasteners according to Eurocode 3 (Ermüdungsfestigkeit von Stahl mit Setzbolzen nach Eurocode 3)." Stahlbau 68, no. 11 (November 1999): 941–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.199903220.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Balaz, Ivan, Michal Kovac, Tomáš Živner, and Yvona Kolekova. "Resistances of I-Section to Internal Forces Interactions." Key Engineering Materials 710 (September 2016): 309–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.710.309.

Full text

Abstract:

Comparison of the formulae taken from 5 Eurocode parts EN 1993-1-1 [1], EN 1993-1-3 [2], EN 1993-1-5 [3], EN 1999-1-1 [4] and EN 1999-1-4 [5] valid for calculation of resistance of I-section under bending moment – shear force interaction. An attempt to create basis for harmonization of different rules used in EN 1993 Design of steel structures and EN 1999 Design of aluminium structures. The rules concerning verification of metal I-section resistance under bending moment – shear force interaction could be simplified and harmonized in the above five parts of metal Eurocodes. Eurocodes interaction formulae are compared with formulae given in Czech [6] and Slovak [7] standards and interaction formulae given in [13 – 18]. Results of large parametric study authors published in papers [8 – 12, 19].The resistance of the I-section to interaction of bending and torsion internal forces [20 – 22] which is missing in the current Eurocodes is analyzed too. New approach is proposed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Gyulai, Klára, Ene Jakab, and József Tajnafói. "Bordázott lemezek költségelemzése és méretezése az eurocode 3 alaján." Fiatal Műszakiak Tudományos Ülésszaka 1. (1998) (1998): 173–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.36243/fmtu-1998.44.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Hicks, Stephen, Brian Uy, and Won-Hee Kang. "Barriers to global adoption of Eurocode 3 and 4." IABSE Symposium Report 105, no. 36 (September 23, 2015): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/222137815818357827.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Johansson, Bernt, René Maquoi, and Gerhard Sedlacek. "New design rules for plated structures in Eurocode 3." Journal of Constructional Steel Research 57, no. 3 (March 2001): 279–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0143-974x(00)00020-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Baptista, A. M., and J. P. Muzeau. "Design of tapered compression members according to Eurocode 3." Journal of Constructional Steel Research 46, no. 1-3 (April 1998): 146–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0143-974x(98)00064-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Sánduly, Annabella, Anett Tóth, and Barnabás-Attila Lőrincz. "Értelmezési hézagok az Eurocode 3 szabvány előírásainak alkalmazása során." Műszaki Tudományos Közlemények 11, no. 1 (2019): 171–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.33895/mtk-2019.11.38.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Pogonowska-Płatek, Sylwia, and Wojciech Dornowski. "Stability analysis of steel frames according to Eurocode 3." Bulletin of the Military University of Technology 68, no. 2 (June 28, 2019): 145–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.3008.

Full text

Abstract:

In the paper, the qualitative and quantitative comparison of EC3 methods to verify the global stability of the structure is presented. The steel portal frame subjected to varied loads is considered. The initial global sway imperfection and the initial local bow imperfections of member frame are taken into account. The sensitivity of a structure to the 2nd order effects is assessed indirectly using the elastic critical load. The elastic critical load of a frame is calculated according to the buckling mode. The 2nd order effects are taken into account using the finite element method. Keywords: second order effects, steel frame, global stability, critical load.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Csiky, Vidor. "Félmerev keretcsomópont nyomaték-szögelfordulás karakterisztikájának meghatározása az eurocode 3 alapján." Fiatal Műszakiak Tudományos Ülésszaka 1. (1998) (1998): 181–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.36243/fmtu-1998.46.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Stranghöner, Natalie, Markus Schiborr, Ralf Glienke, Martin-Christoph Wanner, and Detlef Ulbrich. "Gleitfeste Verbindungen nach Eurocode 3 und DIN EN 1090-2." Stahlbau 82, no. 10 (October 2013): 750–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.201310098.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Kuhlmann, Ulrike, and Christina Schmidt-Rasche. "NEXT GENERATION OF EUROCODE 3 - EVOLUTION BY IMPROVEMENTS AND HARMONIZATION." ce/papers 1, no. 4 (December 2017): 497–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cepa.549.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Schlundt, Andreas. "Eurocode 6 Teil 3 - Grundlagen und Anwendungsbedingungen des vereinfachten Berechnungsverfahrens." Mauerwerk 16, no. 3 (June 2012): 116–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dama.201200535.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Kuhlmann, Ulrike. "Eurocode 3 Part 1.5: Plated Structures - new chances and developments." Steel Construction 5, no. 1 (February 2012): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stco.201210010.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Bijlaard, Frans. "Eurocode 3, a basis for further development in joint design." Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62, no. 11 (November 2006): 1060–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Fedghouche, Ferhat. "Minimum cost plastic design of steel beams using Eurocode 3." KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 22, no. 2 (April 25, 2017): 629–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0546-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Flederer, Holger. "Dresdener Stahlbaufachtagung 2009 - Eurocode 3 und DIN EN 1090-2." Stahlbau 78, no. 7 (July 2009): 518–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.200990096.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Carazo Alvarez, D., M. Haq, J. D. Carazo Alvarez, and Eann A. Patterson. "Thermoelastic Stress Analysis of T-Stub Model." Applied Mechanics and Materials 70 (August 2011): 464–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.70.464.

Full text

Abstract:

Thermoelastic Stress Analysis (TSA) has been used to obtain the stress field in bolted T-Stub joint models (as defined by Eurocode 3) subject to cyclic loading which were employed to validate a Finite Element (FE) model. It was concluded from the results of the experiments and modeling that the behavior of the T-Stub is more complex than claimed by Eurocode due to contact forces, bolt interaction and plastic behavior.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Kala, Zdeněk. "Probabilistic Verification of Structural Stability Design Procedures." Open Civil Engineering Journal 12, no. 1 (September 27, 2018): 283–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874149501812010283.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction: This contribution presents a comparison of three methods of the statistical computation of the design load-carrying capacity of a steel plane frame. Two approaches of the European Standard Eurocode 3 and one stochastic approach are applied. The stochastic approach takes into account the random influence of all imperfections and can be applied to the reliability verification of design according to Eurocode 3. Methods: The columns and beams in the steel frame are modelled with beam elements using the stability solution with buckling length and the geometrically nonlinear solution. The stochastic computational model is based on the geometrically nonlinear solution and on the random influence of initial imperfections, whose random samplings are simulated using the Monte Carlo method. Results and Conclusion: The design load-carrying capacity of the steel plane frame computed using the stability solution with buckling length is in good agreement with the stochastic solution in which the design value is calculated as 0.1 percentile. On the contrary, the geometrically nonlinear solution according to Eurocode 3 gives the lowest (safest) values of design load-carrying capacity.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Boissonnade, N., J. P. Jaspart, J. P. Muzeau, and M. Villette. "Improvement of the interaction formulae for beam columns in Eurocode 3." Computers & Structures 80, no. 27-30 (November 2002): 2375–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7949(02)00238-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Hauer, Markus. "Eurocode 6 Teil 3 - Bemessung von Mauerwerkswänden nach dem vereinfachten Verfahren." Mauerwerk 16, no. 3 (June 2012): 121–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dama.201200534.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Bijlaard, Frans. "Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Present status and further developments." Steel Construction 1, no. 1 (September 2008): 16–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stco.200890000.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Ma, Weixin, Jurgen Becque, Iman Hajirasouliha, and Jun Ye. "Cross-sectional optimization of cold-formed steel channels to Eurocode 3." Engineering Structures 101 (October 2015): 641–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.051.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Carbonell-Márquez, Juan Francisco, Luisa María Gil-Martín, and Enrique Hernández-Montes. "Strength design optimization of structural steel members according to Eurocode 3." Journal of Constructional Steel Research 80 (January 2013): 213–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.019.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Chruściel, Wojciech, and Paweł Sulik. "The use of simplified methods for designing according to EC6 and safety of masonry structures." Budownictwo i Architektura 12, no. 3 (September 11, 2013): 013–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.1982.

Full text

Abstract:

The article describes the calculation method of masonry walls loaded vertically according to PN-EN 1996-1-1 and PN-EN 1996-3. The Calculation method is given and the differences between Eurocode 6 and "old Polish standard" are indicated. Additionally, the differences between calculations according to exact and simplified method described in Eurocode 6 that show adverse consequences of the use of simplified method. The places (formulas and assumptions), which causes the discrepancies in calculation methods are pointed out in the study.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Shin, Dong Ku, and Kyungsik Kim. "Evaluation of Compressive Strengths of HPS Plate Systems Stiffened with Trapezoidal Stiffeners." Advanced Materials Research 671-674 (March 2013): 1025–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.671-674.1025.

Full text

Abstract:

The ultimate compressive strengths of high performance steel (HPS) plate system stiffened longitudinally by closed stiffeners have been investigated by the nonlinear finite element analysis. Both conventional and high performance steels were considered in models following multi-linear strain hardening constitutive relationships. Initial geometric imperfections and residual stresses were also incorporated in the analysis. Numerical results have been compared to compressive strengths from Eurocode 3 EN 1993-1-5 and FHWA-TS-80-205. It has been found that although use of Eurocode 3 EN 1993-1-5 and FHWA-TS-80-205 may lead to highly conservative design strengths when very large column slenderness parameters are encountered

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Delyová, Ingrid, Peter Sivák, František Trebuňa, and Beata Hricová. "Influence of Material Structure and its Properties on Predicting Life of Pressure Pipelines." Applied Mechanics and Materials 611 (August 2014): 430–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.611.430.

Full text

Abstract:

Pressure pipelines belong to the group of technological carrying structures that are designed in accordance with Standard Eurocode 3: STN EN 1993: Design of steel structures. These standards are used also later in the stage for assessment of failure states and fatigue life. Standard Eurocode 3: STN EN 1993-4-3 establishes the requirements for material properties of pipes and welds, associated with mechanical properties. A serious problem in estimating fatigue life of structure is the consideration of gradual degradation. The article also discusses the analysis of fatigue failure of the pressure pipeline, where it was found that the initiation of fatigue failure occurred in the area of poor weld. The further spread of the crack then occurred in the base material of the pipeline.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Sanjarovskiy, Rudolf S., Frieder Sieber, Tatyana N. Ter-Emmanuilyan, Maxim M. Manchenko, Turlybek T. Musabaev, and Muhlis Ahmed ogly Gadzhiev. "Theory of the calculation of the reinforced concrete and inconsistency it to Eurocode." Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings 16, no. 3 (December 15, 2020): 185–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2020-16-3-185-192.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of the work - to analyze the theory, which is widely used in the calculations of various constructions and buildings, consisting of five theories that do not correspond to each other (or erroneous), which reject the fundamental properties of structural concrete and the principles of the Eurocode. Methods. According to the authors and their research this theory contains: a set of theories of various purposes rejecting each other, including erroneous, physically impossible jumps from one theory to another, jumps of various design schemes, unacceptable in the elastoplastic stage. In it: there are mathematical errors; the fundamental concepts of the classical and general theory of calculation are distorted; the principle of designing bearing capacity in ultimate conditions and the process of continuous loading of structures established by the Eurocode are rejected; the fundamental properties in Eurocode of structural concrete are replaced; it is stated that the theory is determined not by the properties of materials, but by the partialities of the developers; references are made to the abstract results of experiments. Results. We analyze the theory of calculating for mass application which accompanied by the necessary mathematical calculations and experimental estimates.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Oliveira, Pedro N., Elza M. M. Fonseca, and Raul D. S. G. Campilho. "Easy Trends to Analyse Structural Profiles: Lumped Capacitance Vs Simplified Equation." International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering 10, no. 5 (November 30, 2020): 625–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.100506.

Full text

Abstract:

This work presents the calculation of the temperature in different cross-sections of structural profiles (IPE, HEM, L and UAP) using the lumped capacitance method and the simplified equation from Eurocode 3 part 1-2. The lumped capacitance method allows the temperature calculation of the solid body at any time instant during the heat transient process, as a constant and uniform value. The simplified equation from Eurocode 3 part 1-2 is a simple model for heat transfer based on the uniformly distributed temperature over the cross-section surface and directly proportional to section factor of the element. Steel profiles have as almost thermal behaviour uniform during the heat transfer process when submitted to fire conditions and the lumped capacitance method allows a great simplification to estimate the temperature field in the element and may be used when Biot number is lower than unity. Therefore, thermal analysis of solids with high thermal conductivity using this method is adequate. For the studied steel profiles, a thermal analysis was also performed using the simplified equation from the Eurocode 3 part 1-2 in order to validate the obtained results from the lumped capacitance method. The results from both methods are presented for discussion and analysis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Kuhlmann, Ulrike, and Antonio Zizza. "Concept for the Future Development of Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures." IABSE Symposium Report 105, no. 36 (September 23, 2015): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/222137815818357791.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Barreto, V., and D. Camotim. "Computer-aided design of structural steel plane frames according to Eurocode 3." Journal of Constructional Steel Research 46, no. 1-3 (April 1998): 367–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0143-974x(98)00132-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Stranghöner, Natalie, Dominik Jungbluth, Volker Hüller, and Gregor Machura. "Anziehen von geschraubten Verbindungen nach Eurocode 3 und DIN EN 1090-2." Stahlbau 85, no. 5 (May 2016): 327–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.201610377.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Kuhlmann, Ulrike, Antonio Zizza, Benjamin Braun, and Hervé Degée. "New chances and developments of Eurocode 3 Part 1.5 - Bridge design aspects." Steel Construction 4, no. 4 (November 24, 2011): 224–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stco.201110030.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Berrais, Abbes, and Kieran Pollitt. "An excel based design tool for end plate connections to Eurocode 3." Steel Construction 7, no. 4 (November 2014): 274–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stco.201420037.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Hobbacher, Adolf F., Stephen J. Hicks, Michail Karpenko, Franz Thole, and Brian Uy. "Transfer of Australasian bridge design to fatigue verification system of Eurocode 3." Journal of Constructional Steel Research 122 (July 2016): 532–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.03.023.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Ndogmo, J. "Beulnachweis bei Verbundbrücken nach ENV 1993-Teil 1.5 (Eurocode 3-1-5)." Stahlbau 69, no. 7 (July 2000): 523–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.200001810.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Mensinger, Martin, and Martin Stadler. "Aktualisierte Diagramme zur Bemessung von Stahlkonstruktionen für den Brandfall nach Eurocode 3." Stahlbau 78, no. 4 (April 2009): 253–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.200910037.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!