Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Eurokod 2 / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Eurokod 2.

Journal articles on the topic 'Eurokod 2'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Eurokod 2.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Nwoji, CU, and AI Ugwu. "COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BS 8110 AND EUROCODE 2 IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS." Nigerian Journal of Technology 36, no. 3 (June 30, 2017): 758–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njt.v36i3.14.

Full text

Abstract:

This work was undertaken to compare the use of BS 8110 and Eurocode 2 in the design of structures and focused on outlining the relative gains and/or shortcomings of Eurocode 2 and BS 8110 under certain criteria which are loading, analysis, ease of use and technological advancement. To accomplish this, the analysis and design of the main structural elements in reinforced concrete building was undertaken using the two codes. A modest medium rise building was loaded using the two code and analyzed. Analysis was done using CSI start tedds to obtain the shear force and bending moment envelopes. For the beam, it was found that Eurocode 2 gave higher internal supports moments. For the case of maximum span moments and shear force values, the Euroode 2 values lagged behind. Column load and moments values were generally lower for Euroode 2. In summary, the comparative benefits of using Euroode 2 are that it is logical and organized, less restrictive and more extensive than the BS 8110. The new Eurocodes are claimed to be the most technically advanced code in the world and therefore should be adopted by Nigerian engineers.Â http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njt.v36i3.14

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Jensen, Bjarne Christian, and Andrzej Lapko. "ON SHEAR REINFORCEMENT DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL CONCRETE BEAMS ON THE BASIS OF THEORY OF PLASTICITY." JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 15, no. 4 (December 31, 2009): 395–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.395-403.

Full text

Abstract:

Modern design of reinforced concrete structural members for shear is based on the theory of plasticity. This paper is written to contribute to the understanding of the inclination of the concrete strut in the inclined strut model for design of shear reinforcement in beams, which among others are used in Eurocode 2. The problem of inclination of the compression strut in truss model is analysed depending on shear reinforcement ratio and effectiveness ratio of concrete strength for compression. Also the understanding of necessary ductility in steel reinforcing bars is discussed in the paper and especially the needs of tests on translation capacity of the shear failure are here analysed. To explain these problems the paper gives a short introduction to the theory of plasticity of reinforced concrete in shear and the background for the equations, which are used in shear design according to Eurocode 2. Santrauka Šiuolaikinis gelžbetonio elementų skersinės armatūros skaičiavimas pagrįstas plastiškumo teorijos principais. Straipsnyje pateikti sijų skersinės armatūros skaičiavimo ypatumai, taikant įstrižojo statramsčio modelį, kuris taikomas ir Eurokode 2. Išnagrinėtas gniuždomojo strypo pavertimas santvaros modelyje, atsižvelgiant į skersinės armatūros ir efektyvaus gniuždomojo betono stiprio santykį. Aptartas armatūrinio plieno strypų stamantrumas, akcentuota sijų laikomosios galios šlyčiai eksperimentinių tyrimų būtinybė. Pateiktas gelžbetoninių sijų šlyties skaičiavimas, taikant plastiškumo teorijos principus. Aptartas Eurokode 2 šlyties skaičiavimams taikomų priklausomybių teorinis pagrindas.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Ruge, T. "Momentenumlagerung nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 88, no. 9 (September 1993): 241–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.199300360.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Li, Wei, Fuchun Zhu, Jim Rasico, and Bachar Aljundi. "Development of Advanced EuroSID-2 and EuroSID-2re Radioss Dummies." SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing 3, no. 1 (April 12, 2010): 99–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-0215.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

LEVI, F. "BRIEFING. EUROPEAN INFLUENCES - EUROCODE 2." Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering 97, no. 2 (May 1993): 50–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/icien.1993.23256.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Pisani, Marco A. "Pre-stressing and Eurocode E.C.2." Engineering Structures 20, no. 8 (August 1998): 706–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(97)00101-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Göttlich, Peter. "Begrenzung der Biegeschlankheit nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 107, no. 1 (January 2012): 38–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201100023.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Siburg, Carsten, Josef Hegger, Johannes Furche, and Ulrich Bauermeister. "Durchstanzbewehrung für Elementdecken nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 109, no. 3 (March 2014): 170–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201300075.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Schnell, Jürgen. "Memorandum des DAfStb zum Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 109, no. 5 (May 2014): 364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201400026.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Quast, U. "Nachweis der Knicksicherheit nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 80, no. 1 (January 1985): 13–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.198500030.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Ignatiadis, Anett, Frank Fingerloos, Josef Hegger, and Frederik Teworte. "Eurocode 2 - analysis of National Annexes." Structural Concrete 16, no. 1 (March 2015): 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/suco.201400060.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Tue, Nguyen Viet, and Katrin Turner. "Begrenzung der Rissbreite nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 111, no. 8 (August 2016): 516–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201600016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Engelmann, Michael, and Bernhard Weller. "Vorbild Spannbeton: Glasträger nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 113, no. 9 (August 1, 2018): 676–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201800029.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Šapalas, Vaidotas, and Gintas Šaučiuvėnas. "THE STABILITY OF BUILT-UP AXIAL LOADED COLUMN IN LIGHT OF STR AND EC3." Engineering Structures and Technologies 3, no. 4 (December 31, 2011): 150–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/skt.2011.17.

Full text

Abstract:

Straipsnyje pateikta plieninių spragotinio skerspjūvio kolonų laikomųjų galių, apskaičiuotų vadovaujantis Lietuvoje galiojančių plieninių konstrukcijų projektavimo normų STR 2.05.08:2005 ir Eurokodo 3 nuostatomis, lyginamoji analizė. Skaičiavimai buvo atliekami vienodomis pradinėmis sąlygomis, tik naudoti skirtingi skaičiavimo metodai. Kai kuriais atvejais gautieji rezultatai yra labai prieštaringi ir reikalingi išsamesnės analizės ar eksperimentinių tyrimų. The paper presents the analysis of built-up laced axially loaded steel columns in light of Eurocode 3 and Lithuanian design code STR 2.05.08:2005. The theoretical part analyzes two design methods. Some cases indicate principal differences. According to STR, axial forces are equally divided into two parts for both chords. However, in Eurocode 3, axial force (formula 8) for one chord increases due to the additional bending moment (Formula 6) that depends on the shear stiffness of lacings (Formula 5). For very slender columns, the axial force of one chord, considering Eurocode 3, is 2.7 times bigger than that taking into account the STR method. Another big difference between the methods is that according to Eurocode 3 it is not necessary to check the overall stability of the built-up member round the z-z axis (only checking the stability of one chord round the z1-z1 axis is obligatory). Both methods require checking the stability of one chord round the y-y axis. In two cases, calculations referred to the same initial data (Table 1, 2) applying different design codes. The obtained results are presented in the diagrams. The first case shows that column slenderness in both planes equals λy = λz. The axially loaded column calculated with reference to the STR method has bigger bearing capacity reserve than that calculated considering the Eurocode 3 method. In this case, the stability of one chord round the y-y axis (Fig. 3) is the most dangerous. This example illustrates that the stability condition of the axially loaded column according to Eurocode 3 is not satisfied; thus, a necessity of increasing the column cross-section arises. The main reason for the latter situation is a different method used for calculating the axial force of one chord. This difference is greater for more slender columns. In the second case - column slenderness makes λy = λz/2. When slenderness is λz ≤ 100, the axially loaded column calculated according to the STR method has similar results compared to the Eurocode 3 method (Fig. 10). The most dangerous according to STR is the stability of the entire column round the z-z axis (Fig. 8), whereas in accordance with Eurocode 3 it appears to be the stability of one chord round the y-y axis (Fig. 9). In such a case, the stability condition of the axially loaded column according to Eurocode 3 has more reserve only when slenderness is λz > 100 (Fig. 10). Therefore, calculation according to Eurocode 3 is less safe if compared to the STR method. The main reason is that Eurocode 3 does not require checking the entire column stability round the z-z axis. Hence, for calculating slender columns according to Eurocode 3, some cases (λz > 100) are not very safe, which was also noticed in the numerical investigations provided by other authors Kalochairetis (2011). In some cases, results are controversial, and therefore it is necessary to perform additional analysis or experimental investigation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Hegger, Josef, Frank Häusler, and Marcus Ricker. "Zur Durchstanzbemessung von Flachdecken nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 103, no. 2 (February 2008): 93–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.200700596.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Hegger, Josef, Joost C. Walraven, and Frank Häusler. "Zum Durchstanzen von Flachdecken nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 105, no. 4 (April 2010): 206–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201000013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Windels, R. "Graphische Rissbreitenermittlung für Zwang nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 87, no. 8 (August 1992): 189–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.199200320.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Brüning, R., and F. Stangenberg. "Direktes Bemessungsverfahren für Rechteckquerschnitte nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 87, no. 10 (October 1992): 241–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.199200410.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Haro, C. E., and U. Quast. "Neuartige Hilfsmittel zur Stützenbemessung nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 89, no. 8 (August 1994): 209–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.199400370.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Quast, U. "Zur Kombination von Einwirkungen nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 91, no. 2 (February 1996): 25–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.199600060.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Pecić, Nenad, Snežana Mašović, and Saša Stošić. "Verification of deflection according to Eurocode 2." Structural Concrete 18, no. 6 (June 29, 2017): 839–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/suco.201600234.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Biskinis, Dionysis, and Michael N. Fardis. "Cyclic shear resistance model for Eurocode 8 consistent with the second-generation Eurocode 2." Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18, no. 6 (February 28, 2020): 2891–915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00807-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Davis, M. J. "EUROCVD-13." Chemical Vapor Deposition 8, no. 1 (January 16, 2002): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1521-3862(20020116)8:1<7::aid-cvde7>3.0.co;2-a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Bogensberger, Wolfgang. "Terrorismus – Bestandsaufnahme durch Europol." Neue Kriminalpolitik 20, no. 2 (2008): 47–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0934-9200-2008-2-47.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Allendorf, M. D. "EUROCVD-12." Chemical Vapor Deposition 6, no. 1 (February 2000): 9–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-3862(200002)6:1<9::aid-cvde9>3.0.co;2-e.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Vollum, R., and D. Parker. "External beam–column joints: design to Eurocode 2." Magazine of Concrete Research 60, no. 7 (September 2008): 511–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/macr.2007.00126.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Fingerloos, Frank. "Der Eurocode 2 für Deutschland - Erläuterungen und Hintergründe." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 105, no. 6 (June 2, 2010): 342–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201000017.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Fingerloos, Frank. "Der Eurocode 2 für Deutschland - Erläuterungen und Hintergründe." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 105, no. 7 (June 30, 2010): 406–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201000021.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Fingerloos, Frank. "Der Eurocode 2 für Deutschland - Erläuterungen und Hintergründe." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 105, no. 8 (July 26, 2010): 486–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201000039.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Fingerloos, Frank. "Der Eurocode 2 für Deutschland - Erläuterungen und Hintergründe." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 105, no. 9 (September 1, 2010): 562–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201000044.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Ignatiadis, Anett, Frank Fingerloos, Josef Hegger, and Frederik Teworte. "Auswertung der Europäischen Nationalen Anhänge zum Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 109, no. 12 (December 2014): 860–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201400065.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Allgöwer, G., and R. Avak. "Bemessungstafeln nach Eurocode 2 für Rechteck- und Plattenbalkenquerschnitte." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 87, no. 7 (July 1992): 161–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.199200270.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Mattheiß, J. "Vorbemessung knickgefährdeter Stahlbetonstützen mit Rechteckquerschnitt nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 89, no. 5 (May 1994): 129–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.199400210.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Wimmer, H. "Kippnachweis über Vergleichsschlankheiten im Rahmen von Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 93, no. 1 (January 1998): 20–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.199800040.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Ball, Peter. "Einwirkungskombinationen für Flachbodentanks nach Eurocode - Beispiele (Teil 2)." Stahlbau 84, no. 4 (April 2015): 285–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.201510260.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Strauss, Alfred, Roman Wendner, Jürgen Suda, Konrad Bergmeister, and Robert Hofmann. "Bemessung eines Stützbauwerks nach Eurocode - Teil 2: Erdbebenbemessung." Bautechnik 87, no. 7 (July 8, 2010): 404–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bate.201010031.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

H. Ahmad, Shuaib, S. F. A. Rafeeqi, and Shamsoon Fareed. "Shear Predictions of Eurocode EC2." American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 1, no. 2 (April 20, 2013): 43–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-1-2-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Milicevic, Ivan, and Nenad Pecic. "Creep and shrinkage of concrete according to Eurocode 2." Tehnika 72, no. 5 (2017): 655–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/tehnika1705655m.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Jędrzejczak, Marek, and Krzysztof Klempka. "Limitation of Stresses in Concrete According to Eurocode 2." MATEC Web of Conferences 117 (2017): 00067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711700067.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Tillmann, Mathias. "Der Eurocode 2 für Deutschland - Auswirkungen auf den Betonfertigteilbau." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 106, no. 1 (January 2011): 2–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201010076.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Curbach, Manfred, Gerhard Breitschaft, Karl Morgen, Lars Meyer, Christoph Müller, and Joachim Naumann. "Eurocode 2 oder DIN 1045: Brauchen wir das Neue?" Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 105, no. 6 (June 2, 2010): 340–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201090046.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Shekhovtsova, Zh B. "How it works? Group Eurocord." Russian Journal of Children Hematology and Oncology 2, no. 4 (February 3, 2016): 77–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.17650/2311-1267-2015-2-4-77-78.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Pavilionis, Žygimantas. "JONO PAULIAUS II IR BENEDIKTO XVI POŽIŪRIS Į EUROPOS SĄJUNGĄ." Politologija 59, no. 3 (January 1, 2015): 3–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/polit.2010.3.8297.

Full text

Abstract:

Katalikų bažnyčia yra vienintelė institucija Europoje, nepertraukiamai veikianti ištisus kelis tūkstančius metų, jokia kita institucija ar organizacija Europoje tokiu tęstinumu pasigirti negali. Atitinkamai jokia kita institucija negali prilygti Bažnyčiai savo indėliu į Europos kūrimą. Dauguma Europos Sąjungos piliečių – net 260 milijonų – save laiko katalikais1. Tačiau dabartinės Europos Sąjungos, skaičiuojančios tik kelis savo gyvavimo dešimtmečius, vadovai naujausioje Lisabonos sutartyje nesugebėjo sutarti dėl nuorodos į krikščioniškas Europos Sąjungos šaknis. Šis Bažnyčios ir Europos Sąjungos pozicijų išsiskyrimas nėra atsitiktinis – tūkstantmečiais Bažnyčios puoselėjama Europos samprata dabartinėje Europos Sąjungoje tampa vis svetimesnė. Europos Sąjunga praranda savo metapolitinį arba dvasinį lygmenį, savo prasmę bei tikslą, pats Sąjungos funkcionavimas ar net išlikimas tampa jos savaiminiu tikslu. Savo ruožtu, Jonas Paulius II ir Benediktas XVI bandė ir bando paskatinti Europos Sąjungą atsigręžti į tūkstantmetes vertybes, kurios lėmė ilgametį Europos dominavimą pasaulyje. Jono Pauliaus II teigimu, „vyksta didžiulis dvasinis konfliktas ir nuo to, kaip jis baigsis, priklausys šio tūkstantmečio pradžioje besiformuojantis Europos veidas“2. Kokia yra ši Šventojo Sosto Europos Sąjungos samprata, kurią aktyviai bando skleisti Jonas Paulius II ir Benediktas XVI, tačiau kurios negali priimti dabartinė Europos Sąjunga?

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

BEAL, A. N. "DRAFT EUROCODE 2. IS THIS THE FUTURE OF CONCRETE DESIGN?" Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings 99, no. 4 (November 1993): 377–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/istbu.1993.25332.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Cladera, A., and A. R. Marí. "Shear strength in the new Eurocode 2. A step forward?" Structural Concrete 8, no. 2 (June 2007): 57–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/stco.2007.8.2.57.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Vollum, R. L., T. Abdel-Fattah, M. Eder, and A. Y. Elghazouli. "Design of ACI-type punching shear reinforcement to Eurocode 2." Magazine of Concrete Research 62, no. 1 (January 2010): 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/macr.2008.62.1.3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Ricker, Marcus, and Carsten Siburg. "Vergleich der Durchstanzbemessung nach Model Code 2010 und Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 109, no. 11 (November 2014): 771–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.201400068.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Litzner, H. U. "Grundlagen der Bemessung und Nachweis der Grenzzustände nach Eurocode 2." Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 80, no. 1 (January 1985): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/best.198500010.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Stranghöner, Natalie, Markus Schiborr, Ralf Glienke, Martin-Christoph Wanner, and Detlef Ulbrich. "Gleitfeste Verbindungen nach Eurocode 3 und DIN EN 1090-2." Stahlbau 82, no. 10 (October 2013): 750–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.201310098.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Flederer, Holger. "Dresdener Stahlbaufachtagung 2009 - Eurocode 3 und DIN EN 1090-2." Stahlbau 78, no. 7 (July 2009): 518–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.200990096.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!