Academic literature on the topic 'Evaluation index system; Expert consultation method (Delphi method); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Evaluation index system; Expert consultation method (Delphi method); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Evaluation index system; Expert consultation method (Delphi method); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)"
1
Hou, Yongmei. "Evaluation Index System for the Effectiveness of the Integrated Development of "Curriculum Ideology" and Ideological and Political Courses in Universities." Global Journal of Arts Humanity and Social Sciences 4, no. 10 (2024): 793–802. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13933372.
Full textAbstract:
To develop a tool for evaluating the effectiveness of the integrated developmen of "Curriculum Ideology" and ideological and political courses in universities. <strong>Method: </strong>Guided by the theories of developmental psychology and educational psychology, expert opinion method (Delphi method) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) were used to construct a evaluation index system for the effectiveness of the integrated development of "Curriculum Ideology" and ideological and political courses in Universities. Firstly, based on the results of three semi-structured interviews with 22 experts and focus group discussions, as well as pre-surveys with other 22 experts, the basic content of the evaluation index system has been preliminarily formulated. Then, Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of consultation with another 65 experts, and the AHP was used to construct an evaluation index system. Finally, a questionnaire survey was conducted on 461 college students to determine the reliability and effectiveness of the evaluation index system. <strong>Results: </strong>The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultation were both 100%, with authoritative coefficients of 0.8267 and 0.8513 (P<0.05), and the coordination coefficients of expert opinions of 0.772 and 0.821, respectively. The coefficients of variation of each indicator were less than 0.15, and the full score rates were higher than 0.30. The final version of the constructed evaluation indicators includes 3 primary indicators, 11 secondary items, and 45 tertiary indicators. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>The construction method of the evaluation index system is scientific, the procedure is standardized, and the evaluation index system has good psychological measurement performance.
2
Li, Jingzhi, Ju Yan, Yundan Cheng, Xiaoling Zhu, and Xiaoxia Jiang. "Construction of a Monitoring Ability Evaluation Indicator System for Emerging Diseases." Scientific and Social Research 6, no. 6 (2024): 277–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.26689/ssr.v6i6.7419.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: To construct a monitoring ability evaluation indicator system for emerging infectious diseases. Methods: This study adopted two rounds of expert consultation among 11 senior public health professionals using the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the indicators and their weight coefficients. Results: The experts were aged 45.18 ± 8.44 years and had worked for 20.45 ± 9.97 years. All had a bachelor’s degree or above. The expert active coefficients for both rounds of consultation were 100%. The coefficient of expert authority was 0.861, and the coefficient of expert coordination was 0.4 for the first and second rounds of consultation (P < 0.01). After two rounds of expert consultation, the constructed monitoring ability evaluation indicator system consisted of 5 first-level indicators, 17 second-level indicators, and 45 third-level indicators. The five first-level indicators were epidemic discovery ability, epidemic report ability, laboratory testing ability, monitoring system operation guarantee, and comprehensive personnel ability. The top five secondary indicators were timely identification of infected persons, epidemic report time, timely laboratory testing, normalized monitoring ability, and funding. The maximum eigenvector (λmax) was 5.069, the consistency index (CI) was 0.017, the consistency ratio (CR) was 0.016, and CR < 0.1. Conclusion: The evaluation index system for monitoring the capability of emerging infectious diseases has scientific validity and rationality, and it can be used to evaluate the monitoring capability of emerging infectious diseases.
3
Zhang, Ming, Chong Wang, Lulu Fan, and Junyan Yi. "Decision-Making for Typical Pavement Structure Based on Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation and Key Performance Indicators." Coatings 12, no. 8 (2022): 1124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings12081124.
Full textAbstract:
The economy and rationality of the typical structural scheme for asphalt pavement are directly related to the formation of its service target. Based on the original highway asphalt pavement structure in Jilin Province, the evaluation index system was established by the research of the literature, investigation and Delphi method, and the results of expert consultation were tested by indicators such as enthusiasm, authority and coordination. The Kendall coordination coefficient was 0.803, indicating a strong degree of evaluation consistency. Then, using the finite element method and pavement economic analysis method, the key parameters of pavement structure asphalt, pavement design performance and economy are calculated. Finally, the key indicators in the pavement design process are quantified by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and gray relational theory, the weight of each key indicator and the correlation degree of the pavement structure are calculated, and pavement structure 1 is determined to be the best solution. The results show that a decision model for typical structural types of asphalt pavement can be established by using an improved gray relational analytic hierarchy process. In this study, the decision-making model can quickly and conveniently determine the most suitable typical pavement structure, the selected structures are checked, and the calculation results meet the requirements of the specification. However, given the limited reference cases, the proposed pavement structure decision-making method needs to be verified and improved through more practical applications.
4
Xu, Yue, Na Gao, Xiaoqian Li, Ping Wang, Haoyuan Ren, and Hongying Pi. "Construction of the Evaluation Index System for Nurse Deployment Pertaining to the Disaster Rescue." Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging 2022 (June 23, 2022): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2925689.
Full textAbstract:
Based on the Delphi method, the analytic hierarchy process, and the entropy method, this paper constructs the evaluation index system for nurse deployment pertaining to the disaster rescue in military hospitals to furnish the reference evidence for scientific deployment of nursing staff, thereby promoting the rescue supportability. This paper establishes the expert consultation form of the evaluation index system for nurse deployment pertaining to the disaster rescue in military hospitals through expert interviews, group discussions, and so on. The Delphi method is applied to enquire 20 military experts in different professional fields two times, and the evaluation index system is finally determined. The weights of evaluation indexes of disaster rescue nurses are determined by the analytic hierarchy process and entropy method. The construction of the evaluation index system for the deployment of disaster relief nurses in military hospitals through Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process, and entropy method provides a reference method for rational allocation of nurses and points out the key points of hospital training. In addition, this paper provides a reference for the assessment and selection of nurses related to disaster relief in military hospitals and lays a foundation for the construction of subsequent evaluation models, which is of great significance for improving the level of nursing teams.
5
Li, Zheng, and Ding Gui Luo. "Elementary Analysis on Construction of Assessment Index System of Cleaner Production of Cheese Dyeing Enterprises." Applied Mechanics and Materials 268-270 (December 2012): 2031–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.268-270.2031.
Full textAbstract:
The concrete assessment index of cheese dyeing enterprises’ cleaner production is filtered out by the classic Delphi method (Delphi) of expert evaluation. According to the characteristic of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),we have identified the different levels. Finally, assessment index system was established and the weight of each index and standard value were also determined. The cleaner production level can be evaluated eventually more intuitively. So it can provide the technical support and guidance for cleaner production assessment of Cheese Dyeing Enterprises and realize a sustainable development of this kind of enterprises.
6
Huang, Tao, Ya Zhao, and Juan Huang. "Comprehensive quality assessment of “Five-Educations” talents based on AHP and BP neural network." Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 25, no. 2 (2024): 1562–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978241300795.
Full textAbstract:
This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation model for higher education’s “Five-Educations” using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and Back Propagation (BP) neural network. First, a five-dimension evaluation index system (morality, intelligence, sports, aesthetics, and labor) is established through expert consultation and literature analysis. Then, the AHP method determines the weight of each index, ensuring objective and scientific evaluation. Next, we introduce the BP neural network model for efficient evaluation of students’ comprehensive quality through self-learning and adaptive mechanisms. Empirical analysis shows the model’s computational error is within 2.25%, demonstrating excellent accuracy and wide applicability. This research introduces an innovative comprehensive evaluation model for “Five-Education” talent development based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The model quantitatively assesses the comprehensive quality capabilities of talent. Additionally, the introduction of this model serves as a valuable reference for future research in the field of educational assessment.
7
Jingwen, Li, Qiao Jiangang, Dou Yuanming, Fu Xu, and Liu Xiaoli. "Safety Evaluation Method of Antifloating Anchor System Based on Comprehensive Weighting Method and Gray-Fuzzy Theory." Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020 (February 10, 2020): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3216948.
Full textAbstract:
The risk factors in the safety evaluation of antifloating anchor system of underground structure have the characteristics of complexity, grey, and fuzziness. Based on the Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and entropy weight method, this paper establishes a three-level evaluation index system based on four main risk factors and calculates the subjective and objective comprehensive weights of the index according to the comprehensive weighting method. It not only takes into account the valuable experience of the expert group but also reflects the objective impact of the subjective score on the system. On the basis of the above research, the grey-fuzzy safety evaluation method of antifloating anchor system is established by using the grey theory and the relevant theory of fuzzy mathematics. The reliability of the method is verified by an example, which has certain theoretical significance and application value.
8
Xiao, Liang Fen, and Le Ping Bu. "On-Board Power Simulation Training Evaluation Model Based on Improved Gray Analytic Hierarchy Process." Advanced Materials Research 718-720 (July 2013): 1842–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.718-720.1842.
Full textAbstract:
We frist establish the evaluation index system according to the characteristics of the simulation training system through analysis, and second , we calculate the index weight use improved gray analytic hierarchy process which simplify the steps of the original analytic hierarchy process. Third we use the Delphi method to establish the membership degree of every evaluation index, and finally we use fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to get the evaluation results of the simulation training system, the results show that the evaluation model is consistency to the expert assessment , meet the actual needs, is an effective method of power system simulation training assessment.
9
Dai, Muxuan, and Yuanyuan Ma. "Light pollution risk level assessment based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process." Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology 83 (February 27, 2024): 816–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.54097/gpftgg50.
Full textAbstract:
Aiming at the light pollution phenomenon, this paper establishes the light pollution risk level evaluation model. First, the assessment indexes were screened and modified by Delphi's method. Then, on the basis of this assessment system, the assessment model of light pollution risk level was established based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) . Finally, the light pollution risk index was defined in the way of weighted summation of each index.
10
Deng, Xiaozhao, Wenxin Shan, and Yuli Zhou. "Evaluation of Influencing Factors of Security Information Behavior of Online Medical Consultation Users." Security and Communication Networks 2023 (January 2, 2023): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5722600.
Full textAbstract:
In China, online medical consultation is regarded as part of the “Internet + medical treatment” and has gradually become an accepted way for people to seek medical advice. However, many factors can affect users’ security information behavior during the consultation process. In order to explore and evaluate the factors influencing the security information behavior of online medical consultation users, this paper firstly adopted semistructured interviews to collect data concerning the influencing factors originating from users themselves, other personnel, and the environment. Secondly, the Delphi method was used to determine the evaluation index system of the factors influencing the security information behavior of online medical consultation users based on the interview data. In this system, there are three first-level indexes, nine second-level indexes, and twenty-three third-level indexes. Finally, the weight of each evaluation index was calculated by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in the index system. This study improves and deepens the theoretical system of influencing factor evaluation of security information behavior. In addition, it also provides theoretical guidance and support for the more rational development of online medical consultation information services.
Book chapters on the topic "Evaluation index system; Expert consultation method (Delphi method); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)"
1
Di Zio, Simone. "Reducing inconsistency in AHP by combining Delphi and Nudge theory and network analysis of the judgements: an application to future scenarios." In Proceedings e report. Firenze University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-461-8.17.
Full textAbstract:
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a Multi-Criteria method in which a number of decision factors (typically criteria and alternatives) are compared pairwise by one or more experts, using the Saaty scale, with the goal of sorting the alternatives (Saaty, 1977; 1980). For group AHP the Delphi method can be used in parallel with the AHP (Di Zio and Maretti, 2014), and this allows the search for a consensus on each pairwise judgement. A big issue of the AHP regards the inconsistency of the pairwise comparison matrices and here we propose a new method to reduce the inconsistency. As a solution we exploit the Nudge theory (Thaler and Sunstein, 2008) and from the second round of the Delphi survey, we calculate and circulate a Nudge to “gentle push” the experts towards more consistent evaluations. Furthermore, we propose the representation of the AHP matrices through graphs. In a direct graph two nodes are linked with two direct and weighted edges (or one edge with the direction based on the weights), where the weights indicate the evaluation given by an expert or, for a group, the geometric mean of the judgements. This type of visualization facilitates the reading of the results and could also be used as real-time feedback in the Delphi process, by displaying on the edges also a measure of variability. An application is proposed, on the evaluation of four future scenarios on the regulation of genetic modification experiments, assessed by a panel of 27 experts according to different criteria (plausibility, consistency and simplicity). The application demonstrated that it is possible to: a) reduce the inconsistency; b) collect useful textual material which enrich the AHP itself; c) use the inconsistency index as a stopping criterion for the Delphi rounds; d) display the pairwise comparison matrices with graphs.
2
Wang, Wei, Yuan Hu, Ruolin Zhang, Yumei Qi, Chao Gao, and Dongfang Zhang. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Aeronautic Equipment Using Quality Based on Delphi Method and AHP." In Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering. IOS Press, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3233/atde250046.
Full textAbstract:
Aviation equipment use quality evaluation is an important means to improve equipment performance and ensure flight safety. To make aviation equipment design, manufacturing, and repair units more targeted to improve product quality and service, this paper sorted out the factors affecting equipment use quality from the perspective of actual users of aviation equipment. Established a comprehensive evaluation index system for aviation equipment use quality based on the Delphi method. Combined with the analytic hierarchy process, a comprehensive quantitative evaluation model of use quality was established, and the applicability of the proposed method was verified. This study will help to find out the stubborn quality problems existing in the use of aviation equipment. And provide an objective basis for accelerating the solution of aviation equipment quality problems and strengthening quality management.
3
Hu, Zhi, Danqiang Xiao, Jinchang Wang, Yiqiang Yu, Xin Yan, and Wei Zhan. "Geological Suitability Evaluation for Urban Underground Transportation Space Utilisation in Soft Soil Area." In Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering. IOS Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/atde220932.
Full textAbstract:
Geological suitability evaluation of urban traffic underground space utilisation is an important basic work in urban planning, especially for soft soil areas. In this study, firstly, on the basis of analyzing the influencing factors of urban underground transportation space utilisation in soft soil areas, and considering factors such as topography, geotechnical properties, hydrogeology, and existing constructions, an evaluation index system was constructed. The index weights are comprehensively determined according to expert scores and literature research. Then, the evaluation index is quantified by AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method and the suitability of the study area was calculated by multi-objective linear weighting method according to the established evaluation model. Finally, taking Wenyi Road in Hangzhou as an example, using the established evaluation index system and evaluation model to carry out the application research of geological suitability evaluation of underground space utilisation. The research results can provide technical reference for the utilisation of urban traffic underground space in soft soil areas.
Conference papers on the topic "Evaluation index system; Expert consultation method (Delphi method); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)"
1
Yao, Xueying, Tianyu Zhou, and Yafeng Niu. "The Construction of the Evaluation Index System of Children's Educational Game Learning Accessibility." In Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2022) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems. AHFE International, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001093.
Full textAbstract:
The quality of children's educational games affects children's cognitive development and skills. Therefore, the construction of educational game evaluation indexes is playing the big role in the development of educational games. In this paper, the initial evaluation indexes of educational game learning accessibility were developed by applying the relevant theories. Then three rounds of expert evaluations were conducted using the Delphi Method, and the initially formulated educational game learning accessibility evaluation indexes were revised and improved according to the experts' suggestions. This paper determines the educational game learning accessibility evaluation indexes including 3 primary indicators, 7 secondary indicators and 26 tertiary indicators. Finally, two-by-two comparison of indicators at each level is conducted to determine the weight of each evaluation indicator by means of analytic hierarchy process. This evaluation index system can facilitate children's parents and teachers to select educational games according to the indexes, and also provide an effective reference basis for the design, improvement and evaluation of children's educational games in the future.
2
Duan, Lele, and Xingsong Wang. "Interface Evaluation Method of Medical Equipment Based on Aesthetics Measures." In 13th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2022). AHFE International, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002169.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this paper is to provide an effective method to evaluate the interface design of medical equipment to improve user experience. Ngo proposed the calculation method of fourteen aesthetic indexes and tested the method in the layout design of the website. However, he counts the proportion of each index into the same value, which is obviously inconsistent with people's cognitive habits. This paper extends Ego’s research to the application level. We creatively introduce the analytic hierarchy process and redistribute the values to make it consistent with human cognitive habits. The method can help designers quickly pick up the optimal design scheme.In order to construct an effective evaluation system, five indexes that balance symmetry economy regularity and rhythm were selected from ego's 14 aesthetic measures for interface elements displays based on five basic interface design principles, user research and experiences of professional designers. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) that has five steps: 1. Build a hierarchical structure model 2. Construct a judgment matrix 3. Hierarchical single sort 4. Hierarchical total order 5. Consistency check. was used to calculate the weight of each index. An expert was invited to value the indexes and the valued data successfully passed the consistency test.In order to quickly get the calculation results, we programmed all the calculation methods and processed the data of interface elements into matrices. The evaluation method is constructed through MATLAB programming to provide an objective evaluation method for the improvement of the user experience of the interface design of medical equipment.We assume that the model could benefit designers in selecting the optimal design plan and improving the efficiency of using the interface. Then we started empirical research to validate the method. The operating interface of a certain brand of medical pathology product freezing microtome was selected as a sample. For experimentation, we chose five different design schemes of the interface, and processed the interface elements into rectangles. We got the position and area data of the rectangle on the surface from adobe xd.The result is that the evaluation method can well reflect the aesthetics of the medical equipment interface design, play a guiding role in the interface design of the medical equipment, and can improve and enhance the user experience of the medical equipment interface. Due to time reasons, this article does not include more elements that affect the usability of the interface, such as the visual weight of the elements, the purity of the hue, and so on. All the interfaces used have been decolorized because color will affect human evaluation during the research. We will consider including color in the evaluation system in the future research.