Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Evangelium nach Petrus

Contents

Journal articles
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Evangelium nach Petrus'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2025

Last updated: 23 June 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Evangelium nach Petrus.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Evangelium nach Petrus"

1

Riesner, Rainer. "Von Jesus zum Markus-Evangelium." Vox Scripturae - Revista Teológica Internacional 22, no. 1 (2014): 15–44. https://doi.org/10.25188/2447.7443.2014v22n1.56.

Full text

Abstract:

Eine gepflegte Überlieferung von Jesus begann schon vor Ostern. Jesus selbst hat den Jüngern seine Worte in einer Form eingeprägt, die gut im Gedächtnis zu behalten war. Gleich nach Ostern haben Petrus und andere Jünger auch die Taten Jesu in einer solchen Form weitergegeben. Markus stand seit den ersten Jahren der Jerusalemer Urgemeinde in Verbindung mit Petrus. Bereits vor der Veröffentlichung seines Evangeliums, die frühestens 64/65, aber vor 70 in Rom erfolgte, hat Markus Jesus-Überlieferungen schriftlich festgehalten. Das Markus-Evangelium verdient deshalb Vertrauen als ein zuverlässiger Bericht über die Person und das Wirken Jesu.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Bilby, Mark Glen. "Das Evangelium nach Petrus. Text, Kontexte, Intertexte." Vigiliae Christianae 63, no. 1 (2009): 93–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157007208x312752.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Tuckett, Christopher. "Das Evangelium nach Petrus. Text, Kontexte, Intertexte. Edited by Thomas J. Kraus and Tobias Nicklas. (Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur. Archiv für die Ausgabe der Griechischen Christlichen Schiftsteller der ersten Jahrhunderte (TU), 158.) Pp. viii+384. Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2007. €98. 978 3 11 019313 8; 0082 3589." Journal of Ecclesiastical History 59, no. 4 (2008): 721–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022046908004661.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Bilby, Mark G. "Review of Das Evangelium nach Petrus: Text, Contexte, Intertexte, by Thomas Kraus & Tobias Nicklas." January 1, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007208X312752.

Full text

Abstract:

Review of Thomas J. Kraus & Tobias Nicklas (eds.). <em>Das Evangelium nach Petrus. Text, Kontexte, Intertexte</em> (Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur, Band 158), Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2007, VIII + 384 pp., ISBN 978-3-11-019313-8, € 98.00 (cloth). From the review's conclusion, "[R]eading through this collaborative volume to answer the veritable question of questions about <em>EvPet</em>, this reviewer finds that consensus there is not, but that there is an underlying coherence found in this volume, one that runs quite counter to argument of the editors. Th ere is multifaceted and multilayered coherence across the bulk of the chapters that points to a second century provenance. There is a valid connection of the late 2nd, early 3rd century <em>P.Oxy.</em> 2949 with the late 6th, early 7th century Akhmîm fragment. Th e internal evidence, particularly when understood in terms of performance (mnemonic, group-constitutive, or counter-cultural), favors a relatively early provenance. Even while certain reception-historical claims (e.g., regarding <em>Sib.Or.</em> 8 or Melito) are dubious, their refutations, as arguments from silence, cannot disprove such a provenance, and other reception-historical evidence (explicitly in Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions and various Apocryphal Acts, and “proximately” in Justin Martyr and <em>UBE</em>) corroborates it. Even traces of an anti-Jewish bias by the scribe of the Akhmîm fragment does not support the idea of a thorough anti-Jewish re-working of the contents of <em>EvPet</em>, especially since Akhmîm <em>EvPet</em> is simultaneously and cogently both intra-Jewish (favoring Jesus, Joseph of Arimathea and the sympathetic crowds) and anti-Jewish (critiquing Jewish leaders, including Herod, in unfavorable partnership with Rome in the person of Pilate), as expected in a Jewish-Christian composition."

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Bilby, Mark G. "Review of Das Evangelium nach Petrus: Text, Contexte, Intertexte, by Thomas Kraus & Tobias Nicklas." January 1, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3766503.

Full text

Abstract:

Review of Thomas J. Kraus & Tobias Nicklas (eds.). <em>Das Evangelium nach Petrus. Text, Kontexte, Intertexte</em> (Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur, Band 158), Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2007, VIII + 384 pp., ISBN 978-3-11-019313-8, € 98.00 (cloth). From the review's conclusion, "[R]eading through this collaborative volume to answer the veritable question of questions about <em>EvPet</em>, this reviewer finds that consensus there is not, but that there is an underlying coherence found in this volume, one that runs quite counter to argument of the editors. Th ere is multifaceted and multilayered coherence across the bulk of the chapters that points to a second century provenance. There is a valid connection of the late 2nd, early 3rd century <em>P.Oxy.</em> 2949 with the late 6th, early 7th century Akhmîm fragment. Th e internal evidence, particularly when understood in terms of performance (mnemonic, group-constitutive, or counter-cultural), favors a relatively early provenance. Even while certain reception-historical claims (e.g., regarding <em>Sib.Or.</em> 8 or Melito) are dubious, their refutations, as arguments from silence, cannot disprove such a provenance, and other reception-historical evidence (explicitly in Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions and various Apocryphal Acts, and “proximately” in Justin Martyr and <em>UBE</em>) corroborates it. Even traces of an anti-Jewish bias by the scribe of the Akhmîm fragment does not support the idea of a thorough anti-Jewish re-working of the contents of <em>EvPet</em>, especially since Akhmîm <em>EvPet</em> is simultaneously and cogently both intra-Jewish (favoring Jesus, Joseph of Arimathea and the sympathetic crowds) and anti-Jewish (critiquing Jewish leaders, including Herod, in unfavorable partnership with Rome in the person of Pilate), as expected in a Jewish-Christian composition."

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Evangelium nach Petrus"

1

Kraus, Thomas J., and Tobias Nicklas, eds. Das Evangelium nach Petrus. DE GRUYTER, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110922684.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

1965-, Kraus Thomas J., and Nicklas Tobias 1967-, eds. Das Evangelium nach Petrus: Text, Kontexte, Intertexte. Walter de Gruyter, 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Nicklas, Tobias, and Thomas J. Kraus. Evangelium Nach Petrus: Text, Kontexte, Intertexte. de Gruyter GmbH, Walter, 2012.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Evangelium nach Petrus: Text, Kontexte, Intertexte. De Gruyter, Inc., 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

(Editor), Thomas J. Kraus, and Tobias Nicklas (Editor), eds. Evangelium Nach Petrus (Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur 158) (Texte Und Untersuchungen Zur Geschichte Der Altchristlichen Literatur). Walter de Gruyter, 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Evangelium nach Petrus"

1

Leppin, Volker. "Sola gratia – sola fide. Rechtfertigung nach der Römerbriefauslegung des Petrus Lombardus." In Entdeckungen des Evangeliums. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666568961.47.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

"2. Petrus und der geliebte Jünger: 21,15-23." In Das Evangelium nach Johannes. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666513794.325.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

"44. Anhang II. Jesus, Petrus und der Lieblingsjünger 21,15–25." In Das Evangelium nach Johannes. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666516238.557.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

"9. Jesus vor den Hohenpriestern - Petrus verleugnet ihn: 18,12-27." In Das Evangelium nach Johannes. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666513794.273.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

"37. Der Prözeß vor den Juden. Die Verleugnung des Petrus 18,12–27." In Das Evangelium nach Johannes. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666516238.504.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

"III. 6. Das Gottessohnbekenntnis des Petrus und die Verheißung an ihn (16,13–20)." In Das Evangelium nach Matthäus. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.13109/9783666513411.257.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!