Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Evidence in criminal procedure'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Evidence in criminal procedure.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Durham, Helen. "Increasing the effectiveness of the International Criminal Court : the contribution of non-state actors /." Connect to thesis, 1999. http://eprints.unimelb.edu.au/archive/00001392.
Full textStüber, Michael. "Die Entwicklung des Prinzips der Unmittelbarkeit im deutschen Strafverfahren /." Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] : Lang, 2005. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/472669885.pdf.
Full textNash, Susan. "Tipping the scales : the reduction of procedural protection for the accused in inter-jurisdictional cases." Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2000. http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=230623.
Full textMellifont, Kerri Anne. "The derivative imperative : how should Australian criminal trial courts treat evidence deriving from illegally or improperly obtained evidence?" Queensland University of Technology, 2007. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/16388/.
Full textTaylor, Christopher William. "Detectives and disclosure : an analysis of the implementation of the disclosure provisions of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 by CID officers, based on a study of operational procedure in two police force areas." Thesis, Durham University, 2002. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4156/.
Full textVaz, Denise Provasi. "Provas digitais no processo penal: formulação do conceito, definição das características e sistematização do procedimento probatório." Universidade de São Paulo, 2012. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2137/tde-28052013-153123/.
Full textThe development of new technologies and the consequent rise of the Information Society, starting in the twentieth century, led to new personal and social habits and a revolution in the processing and storage of information. In this context, treatment and record of facts and ideas turned to be made digitally with the use of electronic devices operating in the binary system. This new situation has brought several consequences for the criminal proceedings, notably with respect to the evidence. However, legislation and case law have not kept up with the pace of technological change, opening up a normative vacuum in the field of evidence. For this reason, it is essential to analyze the technical and social aspects of this new scenario state of evidence theory in the wake of these changes, so as to conceptualize and establish a proper legal and evidentiary procedure for the verification of digital evidence in the criminal justice process. In assessing the concept and the legal nature of digital evidence, this thesis demonstrates that digital evidence is fundamentally a distinct kind of evidence, which, while similar to the document, nevertheless presents unique characteristics that require specific regulation of its evidentiary procedure. From the definition of the concept, classification and characterization of digital evidence, this thesis examines the proper methods of obtaining and producing digital evidence in a manner consistent with its unique nature, while at the same time questioning the sufficiency and adequacy of the rules in the current law regarding such methods. Finally, this thesis proposes a rudimentary framework of rules for this field.
Laing, Samantha Robyn. "The constitutionality of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act." Thesis, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10948/18619.
Full textBuisman, Caroline Madeline. "Ascertainment of the truth in international criminal justice." Thesis, Brunel University, 2012. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6555.
Full text何駿豪. "論澳門刑事訴訟中的自由心證原則 = On the evidence evaluaion principle in Macau Criminal Procedure Law." Thesis, University of Macau, 2009. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2129881.
Full textArican, Mehmet. "Police detention : a comparative analysis of the effects of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984 and the Turkish Procedure Act." Thesis, University of Leicester, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/2381/30122.
Full textDenecke, Jan. "The admissibility of a case before the International Criminal Court : an analysis of jurisdiction and complementarity." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/53084.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The permanent International Criminal Court (ICC) will come into operation after the 60th ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 1998. The ICC will have jurisdiction over the most serious international crimes, namely war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. The focus of this thesis is the difficulties surrounding the admissibility of a case before the ICC. There are basically two legs to this analysis: jurisdiction and complementarity .. Jurisdiction of the ICC is analysed in historical and theoretical context. This comprises an overview of the international tribunals since the First World War, and more specifically their impact on the development of jurisdiction in international criminal law. Secondly, the thesis is examining the jurisdiction of the ICC in terms of the specific provisions of the Rome Statute. This analysis comprises a detailed analysis of all the provisions of the Rome Statute that have an impact on the exercise of the ICC's jurisdiction. The relationship between the ICC and national courts is a difficult relationship based on a compromise at the Rome Conference in 1998. The principle underlying this relationship is known as "complementarity". This : means that the ICC will only exercise its jurisdiction if a national court is "unwilling" or "unable" to exercise its jurisdiction. A detailed analysis of the different provisions of the Rome Statute, as well as some references to other international tribunals, serve to analyse the impact of complementarity on the eventual ambit of the ICC's jurisdiction. In conclusion, some suggestions regarding the admissibility of cases and the difficult relationship between the ICC and national courts are made.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die permanente Internasionale Strafhof (ISH) sal met sy werksaamhede begin na die 60ste ratifikasie van die Statuut van Rome van 1998. Die ISH sal jurisdiksie uitoefen oor die ernstigste internasionale misdade, tewete oorlogsmisdade, volksmoord en misdade teen die mensdom. Hierdie tesis fokus op die probleme rondom die toelaatbaarheid van 'n saak voor die ISH. Hierdie ontleding het basies twee bene: jurisdiksie en komplementariteit. Die jurisdiksie van die ISH word in historiese en teoretiese konteks ontleed. Dit behels 'n oorsig van die internasionale tribunale sedert die Eerste Wêreldoorlog, en meer spesifiek die impak wat hierdie tribunale op die ontwikkeling van jurisdiksie in die internasionale strafreg gehad het. In die tweede plek word jurisdiksie ontleed aan die hand van die spesifieke bepalings van die Statuut van Rome. Hierdie ontleding behels 'n gedetaileerde ontleding van al die bepalings van die Statuut van Rome wat 'n impak het op die uitoefening van die ISH se jurisdiksie. Die verhouding tussen die ISH en nasionale howe is 'n komplekse verhouding, gebaseer op 'n kompromie wat by die Rome Konferensie van 1998 aangegaan is. Die beginselonderliggend aan hierdie verhouding staan bekend as "komplementariteit". Dit beteken dat die ISH slegs sy jurisdiksie sal uitoefen indien 'n nasionale hof "onwillig" of "nie in staat is" om jurisdiksie uit te oefen nie. 'n Gedetaileerde ontleding van die verskillende bepalings van die Statuut van Rome, sowel as verwysings na ander internasionale tribunale, dien om die impak van komplementariteit op die omvang van die ISH se jurisdiksie, te ontleed. Ten slotte word sekere voorstelle aangaande die toelaatbaarheid van sake en die verhouding tussen die ISH en nasionale howe gemaak.
Júnior, Joel Venâncio da Silva. "Indícios como meio de prova : uma perspectiva de efetividade do processo penal." Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, 2009. http://www.unicap.br/tede//tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=590.
Full textThe role of evidence in criminal proceedings is still a tormenting issue. In Brazil, there are few and incomplete works that deal with the issue. In the criminal procedure code the term evidence is used constantly. Sometimes it appears as a synonym of proof, in other cases less proof. The system seems to be so inconsistent, the result of bad technique and archaic legislation. The scholars of the theme in Brazil admit that the evidence can be used as proof with restrictions. For the majority they need to be supported by direct proof, serving as a complement to that. Indeed the expression evidence is always used in the plural, as such would be its weakness and therefore could only be accepted as evidence if there is a body of evidence and proof harmonics. The restriction on the use of evidence as evidence is justified in view of the principles of real truth, existing in criminal proceedings. The sentencing in the criminal proceedings would only be appropriate when there is a certainty of hard evidence and criminal authorship. The evidence would be unable to reveal the full truth, because it is likely that the court has obtained it through a logical construction, according to the rules of the practice, while the direct evidence could rebuild the fact to be proven. The argument of the real truth is false. The full truth is absolutely unattainable. The philosophy from remote attempts to conceptualize the true reasons without success, this depends on the vision of the speaker and the human limitations of the process itself, and there is no way to get the full truth. What if it is true that the process is able to prove with the evidence available? The prosecution itself mitigates the real truth to impose a series of restrictions on the evidence, as in the case of those obtained by unlawful means. Apart from the real truth there is only the probability of occurrence of fact, whatever the means of evidence are used. The risk of a conviction is unfair in a system of criminal procedure and it only decreases when the parties ensure equal conditions (not only fictitious), it is the end of the dialectal process that can provide the truth
Whitehead, Daniel K. "An historical study of a criminal defendant's right to exculpatory information under the protection of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution." Virtual Press, 1996. http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/1033641.
Full textDepartment of Journalism
Kgosieile, Lameck. "A possible amendment to the criminal procedure and evidence act, 1939 of the republic of Botswana with regard to plea and sentence agreements in an effort to promote the expeditious and efficient disposition of criminal matters." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/73318.
Full textMini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2019.
Government of Botswana
Procedural Law
LLM
unrestricted
Rottier, Benjamin. "L'aveu en droit processuel : essai de contribution à la révélation d’un droit commun." Thesis, Paris 1, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019PA01D008.
Full textThe strength of judicial civil confession is inherited from roman confessio in jure, that was however an admission of claim. Confession being held as an evidence since the medieval law, its nature wears the seal of will whereas its regime is mostly determined by search for the truth. On the one hand, requirement of a free will, both in civil and criminal procedures, grants confession the nature of a legal act intended to prove a fact. Thus genuine confessions can be distinguished from sanctions against litigants who disregard the judge’s imperium, in civil cases as well as in administrative cases. On the other hand, the weight of evidence brought by confession is always determined by the courts in their unfettered discretion. Obligation for civil jurisdictions to state only in consideration of the confessed fact relies on the principle of party disposition. Civil judicial confession 's legal irrevocability is both substantial, as the evidence is permanently constituted, and procedural, preventing the confessor to invoke an opposite allegation of fact. Confession's indivisibility can be analyzed as a result of the suspensive or resolutive condition under which this legal act can be granted
Losis, Egidijus. "Slaptieji tyrėjai ir jų veiklos ribos įrodymų rinkimo procese." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2005. http://vddb.library.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2005~D_20050531_113334-13057.
Full textSilva, Júnior Joel Venâncio da. "Indícios como meio de prova : uma perspectiva de efetividade do processo penal." Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, 2009. http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/470.
Full textThe role of evidence in criminal proceedings is still a tormenting issue. In Brazil, there are few and incomplete works that deal with the issue. In the criminal procedure code the term evidence is used constantly. Sometimes it appears as a synonym of proof, in other cases less proof. The system seems to be so inconsistent, the result of bad technique and archaic legislation. The scholars of the theme in Brazil admit that the evidence can be used as proof with restrictions. For the majority they need to be supported by direct proof, serving as a complement to that. Indeed the expression evidence is always used in the plural, as such would be its weakness and therefore could only be accepted as evidence if there is a body of evidence and proof harmonics. The restriction on the use of evidence as evidence is justified in view of the principles of real truth, existing in criminal proceedings. The sentencing in the criminal proceedings would only be appropriate when there is a certainty of hard evidence and criminal authorship. The evidence would be unable to reveal the full truth, because it is likely that the court has obtained it through a logical construction, according to the rules of the practice, while the direct evidence could rebuild the fact to be proven. The argument of the real truth is false. The full truth is absolutely unattainable. The philosophy from remote attempts to conceptualize the true reasons without success, this depends on the vision of the speaker and the human limitations of the process itself, and there is no way to get the full truth. What if it is true that the process is able to prove with the evidence available? The prosecution itself mitigates the real truth to impose a series of restrictions on the evidence, as in the case of those obtained by unlawful means. Apart from the real truth there is only the probability of occurrence of fact, whatever the means of evidence are used. The risk of a conviction is unfair in a system of criminal procedure and it only decreases when the parties ensure equal conditions (not only fictitious), it is the end of the dialectal process that can provide the truth
O papel dos indícios no processo penal ainda é questão tormentosa. No Brasil poucas e incompletas são as obras que tratam do tema. No código de processo penal a expressão indício é utilizada constantemente. Por vezes aparece com sinônimo de prova, noutras como menos que prova. O sistema mostra-se assim, incoerente, fruto de arcaica e péssima técnica legislativa. Os estudiosos do tema no Brasil, quando admitem que o indício pode ser utilizado como meio de prova o fazem com restrições. Para a maioria eles precisam ser comprovados por prova direta, servindo de complemento àquela. Aliás a expressão indício é sempre utilizada no plural, pois tamanha seria sua fragilidade que só poderiam ser aceitos como prova se houvesse um conjunto deles afinados, harmônicos. A restrição ao uso do indicio como meio de prova se justifica tendo em vista o princípio da verdade real, vigente no processo penal. A condenação no processo penal só seria cabível quando houvesse certeza plena da materialidade e autoria delitiva. O indício seria incapaz de revelar esta verdade plena, por tratar-se de juízo de probabilidade, pois é obtido através de uma construção lógica, pelas regras da experiência. A verdade plena, absoluta é inatingível. A filosofia desde remota época tenta conceituar a verdade sem sucesso, eis que esta depende da visão do falante. Pelas limitações humanas e do próprio processo não há como obter a verdade plena, inatacável. O que se consegue é a verdade que o processo é capaz de revelar com os meios de prova disponíveis. O próprio processo penal mitiga a verdade real ao impor uma série de restrições quanto à prova, como no caso das obtidas por meios ilícitos. Afastada a verdade real só resta a probabilidade da ocorrência do fato, qualquer que sejam os meios de provas utilizados. O risco de uma condenação injusta é uma constante do sistema processual penal e ele só diminui quando se assegura às partes iguais condições (não apenas fictícias), afinal é a dialética do processo que fornecerá a verdade possível
Miescher, Martin. "Die List in der Strafverfolgung /." Bern : Stämpfli Verlag, 2008. http://deposit.d-nb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=3077816&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm.
Full textGuardia, Gregório Edoardo Raphael Selingardi. "Comunicações eletrônicas e dados digitais no processo penal." Universidade de São Paulo, 2012. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2137/tde-02042013-102504/.
Full textIn these days, important communication process (written or verbal) and information storage improve through electronic means. While the access to the computer worldwide web (internet) grows in geometrical progression, it also increases the number of webusers data and more and more advanced technics of gathering and processing information emerge. Routine activities such as sailing or sending electronic messages only happen due to the vast transit of information; like footprints left on the way, the data commutated in these actions allow to re-establish the ways and activities undertaken in the web. The security of these information figures indispensable to private life and demands a severe normative discipline. It is not only a matter of preventing that traffic or contents data may be used against the law. But also to assure that, in exceptional situation described by the legislator, it can be useful to confirm criminal investigation. This work intends a systematic examination of the main ways of searching digital evidence, with the purpose of delimitate the judiciary system of the intervention in electronic and apprehension extent of automation data. So, it must be analysed the constitutional discipline of communication data secrecy (CF, art. 5º, inciso XII) and even to investigate the legal foundation of judicial authorization to obtain electronic information. Under a strictly multidiscipline perspective, one must consider some notions of Cybernetics, telecommunication, Informatics, freedom as reciprocal autonomy access to electronic information and communication, which are essential to understand this new area of human act; the digital place. In the field of constitutional interpretation of law, it is necessary to scrutinize considerable aspects of private life and intimacy protection historical antecedents, privacy right, actual projection such as informative selfdetermination, three sphere theory and inviolability of communication so that they will permit to express an opinion about the constitutionality of interception data in informative proceedings. Sequentially, conceptualize the digital data and their respective categories, penal investigation technics and the protection of digital evidence sources. There may be a cooperation to a better improvement of the effective legal normative, an accurate examination of two different disposition of data incorporation to the process, the intervention in the communicative flow just to receive data and physical apprehension of the informatic device which contains information. As a quest in resources of proof, these proceedings must be examined in a individual way, starting with the aspects such as concept, regulation, juridical nature, finality, legal conditioning (presupposed, requisite and limits), right of defence, judgement of proportionality and control. At last, taken into everything about the conservation, evidential efficiency and the value of automatize contents still we have to enquire about the results of illicit operations perpetrated on digital data.
Vettraino, Florence. "Internationales und staatliches Strafverfahrensrecht." Doctoral thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Juristische Fakultät, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/16741.
Full textThe procedure of the ad hoc international criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda can be regarded as the first set of rules of international criminal procedure. This procedural law, constructed and developed by the judges themselves was primary inspired by the common law approach to criminal proceedings. In the absence of precedents, and given the numerous potential analogies between domestic criminal procedure and international criminal procedure, the judges often referred to domestic legal practices - particularly during the ad hoc tribunals’ first years of activity - when applying rules of procedure and evidence. The present work investigates this reference to domestic law by examining the ad hoc tribunals’ jurisprudence regarding the law of evidence. The reasons for and forms of the reference to domestic law are first presented and then analysed. This study concludes that, on the whole, domestic law is referred to in an unsystematic and pragmatic manner: It is mostly used by the judges in order to provide the most suitable solution for the particular case before them and/ or to legitimate a decision they have already made on the basis of their own procedural rules. Such an approach raises two problems: a legitimacy deficit in regard to the internationality of the ad hoc tribunals’ procedure and a lack of predictability in the application of the rules of procedure and evidence. This study deals therefore finally with the possibility of a methodical approach, which could contribute to more predictability and legitimacy in the application of the procedural rules of international criminal tribunals, regardless of whether or not the judges refer to external normative systems, such as domestic legal orders.
Hennequin, Shirley. "La preuve numérique dans le procès pénal." Thesis, Aix-Marseille 3, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011AIX32063.
Full textAs a medium of the new society of information and communication and as a tool used both for work and play, digital technology has become ubiquitous. It has become man's virtual memory and represents a preferred field for investigation, an inexhaustible source of information. The principle of freedom of evidence in criminal law has allowed digital technology to play a major role : sometimes as evidence of infringement, of its author's imputability and/or identity, it has become inescapable. This general assessment is however limited, as it does not mean that any action can be taken anyhow, whatever the place or time ; digital evidence must indeed be searched for and collected within the rules governing it. Being subjected to the judge's inner conviction, the digital data will also have to offer guarantees of integrity and reliability before being considered as evidence on balance, these observations require that the general characteristics and expected role of digital evidence should be studied in order to examine how this new kind of evidence can be confronted with the system of evidence in criminal law
Anyfantis, Spiridon Nicofotis. "Da captação de imagens como prova no processo penal." Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2004. http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6866.
Full textApproved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-02-22T13:17:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Spiridon Nicofotis Anyfantis - 2004.pdf: 1754042 bytes, checksum: 3be2f4d514c73ade66e257c0e0b50294 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2017-02-22T13:17:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Spiridon Nicofotis Anyfantis - 2004.pdf: 1754042 bytes, checksum: 3be2f4d514c73ade66e257c0e0b50294 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004-03-02
It concerns an essay about the evidences in the penal procedure and its way of production by means of image captation and recordings, whether by hidden cameras or safety ones. It´s composed of five chapters which analyses, respectively, the penal evidence in its particularities and afterwards, the theme of the illegal evidences making, inclusively, a counterpoint between proof illicitness and the proportionateness principle. It still studies the theme of exceptions to the theory of illegal proofs – named by argentinean and spanish exception of the exclusionary rule. They´re studied, briefly, intimacy aspects and individual private life, with subtle distinctions and similarities. Soon after it goes to an analyses regarding the original image recordings evidence – by ostensive cameras and hidden ones – and its use in the penal procedure, specially when used in work places, investigative journalism, private and public places among other circumstances. Finally, such images validity hypothesis are evaluated in the penal procedure and suggestions are presented in order to them, in case of being produced, and in very specific cases, can be effectively used in the process without violation to the intimacy and private life of the individual.
Trata-se de estudo sobre a prova no processo penal e sua forma de produção por meio de captação e gravação de imagens, seja por câmeras ocultas ou de segurança. É composto por cinco capítulos onde se analisam, respectivamente, a prova penal em suas particularidades e, em seguida, o tema das provas ilícitas, fazendo-se, inclusive, contraponto entre a ilicitude da prova e o princípio da proporcionalidade. É estudado, ainda, o tema das exceções à teoria das provas ilícitas – denominada pelos argentinos e espanhóis exceções à regra de exclusão probatória. São estudados, sucintamente, aspectos da intimidade e da vida privada do indivíduo, com suas sutis distinções e semelhanças. É analisada a questão das provas originárias de gravações de imagens – por câmeras ostensivas e ocultas - e sua utilização no processo penal, especialmente quando utilizadas em ambientes de trabalho, jornalismo investigativo, ambientes privados e públicos, dentre outras circunstâncias. São avaliadas as hipóteses de validade de tais imagens no processo penal e apresentadas sugestões para que as mesmas, caso produzidas, e em hipóteses muito específicas, possam ser efetivamente utilizadas no processo sem violação à intimidade e vida privada do indivíduo.
Widder, Elmar Richard [Verfasser]. "A Fair Trial at the International Criminal Court? Human Rights Standards and Legitimacy : Procedural Fairness in the Context of Disclosure of Evidence and the Right to Have Witnesses Examined / Elmar Richard Widder." Frankfurt a.M. : Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2016. http://d-nb.info/1114640247/34.
Full textSafferling, Christoph Johannes Maria. "Towards an international criminal procedure /." Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford University Press, 2003. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0615/2003276194-d.html.
Full textMetenier, Julian. "La protection pénale de l'accusé." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014AIXM1065.
Full textThe theme of the criminal protection of the accused, well-known to criminal specialists, today deserves to be renewed under a probationary essentially angle, in the light of current developments in the criminal trial. Located at the confluence of innocence and guilt, the rights and guarantees granted to the accused understood in its conventional sense, must be analyzed in consideration of the founding principles of presumption of innocence and the rights of the defense. The continuing evolution of these two principles, in a sense diametrically opposite, inevitably reflects the intensity and the terms of the protection afforded any person suspected or prosecuted under criminal proceedings.This study deliberately limited to the pre-trial phase, proposes to understand, in a practical and technical problems, the various case law and legislative developments carried out in the field. Will thus addressed the key issues currently faced in criminal proceedings such as the question of the legal status of the suspect or the effectiveness of the adversarial principle in the preliminary criminal trial. While it may be tempting, at first, to conclude an indisputable strengthening the criminal protection afforded to the accused, then it will be necessary to reconsider this issue in terms of the study of procedural limitations attached to the criminal trial. Far from addressing this issue in a partisan way, it will be about moderation in the remarks. Indeed, perhaps more than any other issue of criminal procedure, it is imperative to keep a sense of proportion
Ekfeldt, Jonas. "Om informationstekniskt bevis." Doctoral thesis, Stockholms universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-125286.
Full textTiede, Lydia Brashear. "The politics of criminal law reform a comparative analysis of lower court decision-making /." Diss., Connect to a 24 p. preview or request complete full text in PDF format. Access restricted to UC campuses, 2008. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/ucsd/fullcit?p3307373.
Full textTitle from first page of PDF file (viewed August 13, 2008). Available via ProQuest Digital Dissertations. Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
Singh, Nerisha. "Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings." Doctoral thesis, Faculty of Law, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32978.
Full textWan-ChingChen and 陳婉菁. "Evaluation on the "New Evidence" of the Criminal Retrial Procedure." Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/y2k2d2.
Full text國立成功大學
法律學系
105
SUMMARY Criminal Retrial Procedure is one of the criminal extraordinary legal remedies. Since 1935, the Supreme Court limited the scope of application inappropriately and made it difficult to reopen a new trial. According to the statistical data of Judicial Yuan, the rate of rejection of Retrial was up to 99%, which means that it was almostly impossible to abtain a chance to Retrial. Fortunately, in 2015, the Criminal Procedure was amended, and some delicate problems were solved. However, there are still lots of issues remained to be discussed, such as the methods of evaluating, the explanation of novelty. In order to solve the problems, we should figure out the way to merge the constitutional principles of the Criminal Procedure harmoniously. Besides, in order to open door to a new trial more widely, the discussion from Japan and Germany will also be considered. In addition, by analyzing the Supreme Court and the High Court cases, the changing of the rejection rate of Retrial can be discovered. On the other hand, we could also expecting finding the clues of how the court evaluating the new evidences. Key Words : Criminal Retrial Procedure, New Evidence, in dubio pro reo, Definite Evidence, Miscarriage of justice.
Chen, De-Chih, and 陳德池. "Preservation of Evidences in Criminal Procedure." Thesis, 2006. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/90289944873858437810.
Full text東吳大學
法律學系
94
Taiwan criminal procedural law has significant changes after the resolution of the National Judiciary Reform Conference in 1999 that determined to adopt the “Adversary System” from the “Official principle”. Amendatory Acts after the conference are proceeded based upon the idea of “Refined Adversary System”. “Preservation of Evidences” is just the product of such a thought. Under this structure, it is to pursuit the equity in substance, one shall not excising imbalanced power then the other party. Such a value creates huge difference between what the “Official Principle” emphasizes, i.e., the prosecutor has the “Objective duty” which imposes the prosecutor the position of a judicial officer instead of a party. The difference reflects the realization to the idea and the component of “Preservation of Evidences”. This article starts from the perspective of the equity of the parties principle, by instructing the concept of “Preservation of Evidences”, portrait the outline of it to assure the establishment of equal rights of both party within the structure of “Preservation of Evidences”. Follow up the introduction to the concept of “Preservation of Evidences”, this thesis further discuss the constitutional basis of this concept in chapter III, since its said that the criminal procedural law is the applicable Constitution, we have to retrace the constitutional basis while we excise the criminal procedural law for a legal rationale. The chapter IV deals with the issue with regard to the present provisions of “Preservation of Evidences”, our criminal legal system heritage most of all provisions from foreign legislation, and the memorandum of our legislation explicitly points out that the design of Taiwan criminal procedural concerning to the “Preservation of Evidences” learned from German, Japan and Taiwan civil procedural code, therefore, whenever we discuss about issues with regard to measures of securing evidences, we are supposed to be aware of the foreign legal structure as well. In the following paragraphs, this thesis would also analyze and review the present provisions with regard to “Preservation of Evidences”. Last but not the least, the chapter V concludes the thesis with all stated above, and provide certain suggestions.
FWU, YIH-SHIANG, and 符億湘. "Evidential Effect and Probative Value of Digital Evidence in the Criminal Procedure Law." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/x329ne.
Full text逢甲大學
財經法律研究所
107
The methods of judicial proof had gone through the period of "ordeal evidence" by praying jiaobei blocks for Gods, the period of “human evidence” by using eyewitness testimony, until the period of “physical evidence” by verifying criminal material evidence. Nowadays, the new technology is changing with each passing day and it is noted that many perpetrators have committed the crimes by using the new technology. Facing the coming era of “digital evidence,” how should the judicial personnel confront this challenge in the modern criminal procedure? For example, the case of the ATM hacking against the First Bank, as the result of remote money dispensation, showed the necessary of exerting digital evidence for accusation against the criminals. The expressive forms of digital evidence include sound, video, telephone, Internet address (IP), geographic location (GPS), etc. With the rapid development of technology, its form is also developing the new from the old and subverting the characteristics of traditional evidence which is not easy to distinguish the authenticity of the evidence by the naked eye or the ear. The characteristics of digital evidence are very different from the general one and the methods of collections and proof identifications on the both sides are also very different. Therefore, the discussion of digital evidence with the reference of the rules of evidence would be an important task on the evaluation of the relationship between evidence admissibility and probative value of digital evidence in the modern criminal procedure. The evaluation of digital evidence is related to the guilty or nonguilty judgments of the suspects whose personal freedom and rights are heavily affected. This thesis thus is based on the rules of evidence, trying to figure out how the digital evidence applied to factum probandum. The comparison between the rules of evidence and the characteristics of digital evidence, as well as the impacts of digital evidence to the evidence admissibility and probative value would be the key issues on the thesis. In the thesis, the first chapter introduces the purpose, method, limitation and scope of the research. The second chapter discusses the definition, development, characteristics and classification of digital evidence. The third chapter describes the content and collection process of digital evidence with basic understanding. The fourth chapter compares the similarities and differences between digital and traditional evidences from the strict form of proof and judicial discretion, hearsay rules, search and seizure, direct evidence and mediate evidence, corroborating evidence as well as the legality principle. The fifth chapter discusses some cases relating to digital evidence. At the end, the thesis will make the conclusions and recommendations at the sixth chapter.
Harris, Rebecca C. "Gatekeeping and the judicial processing of scientific information." Diss., 2006. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3223612.
Full textSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-07, Section: A, page: 2734. Adviser: Ira Carmen. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 204-212) Available on microfilm from Pro Quest Information and Learning.
JAN, CHI-CHANG, and 冉其昌. "The Research on Preliminary Proceeding of Criminal Procedure-Focusing on the Admissibility of Evidence." Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/284vpt.
Full text東吳大學
法律學系
105
Preliminary proceeding of criminal procedure can promote trial to be concentrated and proceed fast. However, our country’s preliminary proceeding is not used well, and causes our first trial to overtake its burden. Therefore, no matter from the view of concentrated trial or the view of speedy trail right, we ought to improve our preliminary proceeding. Because the commission judge cannot make a decision of admissibility of evidence in the preliminary proceeding, our preliminary proceeding excises like an exchange of opinions. Therefore, my paper is focus on investigating admissibility of evidence in the preliminary proceeding. The solution is giving the commission judge the authority to make a decision of admissibility of evidence in the preliminary proceeding. Moreover, constructs the objection procedure by analogizing the Article 288-3 of criminal procedure to give the party opportunities for disagreeing. Therefore, my paper’s chapter 1 is about motive of study and question awareness. Chapter 2 is about presumption of innocence, concentrated trial, speedy trail right, and searching for the connection with preliminary proceeding. Chapter 3 is about the Japanese preliminary proceeding, and focusing on its discovery procedure. Then, compare Japanese preliminary proceeding with ours, and find difference between them. According to that, we can find out the issue of our preliminary proceeding. Chapter 4 is about investigating the admissibility of evidence in the preliminary proceeding and finding out the ways of improvement or suggestion. Chapter 5 is the conclusion of my paper.
TSENG, HENG-YU, and 曾衡禹. "The Admissibility of Extraterritorial Evidence - Focusing on The Testimony Taken Abroad in Criminal Procedure." Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5v7nj2.
Full text東吳大學
法律學系
106
Transnational crime is the product of globalization and has become a global issue. Contury in global governance mechanism such as formulating and signing relevant international convention. All coutries, which set up to criminal consistent standards. The testimony taken abroad in criminal procedure with criminal matters act how to interpret the admissibility of extraterritorial evidences. Whether Criminal Procedure Law with corresponding principle of correspondence. The Supreme Court has, in handling extraterritorial testimonies, applied exceptions to the hearsay rule by analogy or by legal principles. The evident admissibility of special credibility documents is determined with a degree of flexibility so to avoid extraterritorial testimonies being excluded by the hearsay rule. The defendant’s right of cross-examination against the witness can be deemed as a prevailing human right, and is an indispensable element to guarantee a fair trial in judicial proceeding. It is the basic international human right that the accused has the right to confront the witness against him, which is regulated in European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Article 6-3-d and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 14-3-f. This study intends to figure out a proper explanation by integrating scholarly opinion and judicial opinion and comparing to Japanese law, in addition, learning from the analysis of cases.Hopes to alteration of Criminal Procedure law.
CHEN, CHIEH-YU, and 陳婕妤. "A Study on the Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence in the Civil Procedure-the Comparison Between Civil and Criminal Procedure." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/kyxcqw.
Full text東吳大學
法律學系
104
Bases on adversary system, the Civil Procedural of R.O.C. regulates the process of litigation. Parties submit the factum probandum and evidence which is imperative in proving related facts authentic. Whereas considering the admissibility of private obtained evidence in the litigation still left blank, civil procedural law of R.O.C. left leaks as such. Namely, whether the evidence obtained privately is applicable in the litigation is yet regulated. This essay aims at addressing and reviewing these issues, but due to the diversified characteristic and purpose of the two different procedurals, this essay will examine the litigation and regulations separately. Rooting in the constitutional law, general principle of Civil Procedural Law of R.O.C. and the purpose of Civil Procedural Law, this essay, concerning the civil procedural, attempts to scrutinize and review the legality of the prohibition on use of private obtained evidence in the civil litigation. Concluding that the admissibility of private obtained evidence depends on case by case. The illegally private obtained evidence in Criminal Procedural Law of R.O.C., the law itself remains unregulated in this scenario as well. Due to the purpose of criminal procedure deviates from the civil procedural, this essay, concerning criminal procedural, aims at reviewing journals and practices, attempts to integrate the disputed opinions and unifies them. This essay also grades and investigates the evidence exclusionary rules and certain practices of United States. Comparing with the regulations of Taiwan and concluding that experiences of U.S.A. is referable though the rule as such only applies to the illegal detection conducted by the public authority. Lastly, this essay exemplifies certain situations and applies it in civil and criminal procedure separately. Reviewing the diverse aims and purpose and deliberating the application of evidence exclusionary rule of these litigations, to achieve the stability and adequacy of law, this essay examines the necessity of conforming these two applications.
KUO, MENG-HSIN, and 郭孟鑫. "Reconsidering the Principle of Free Evaluation of Evidence in Criminal Procedure-From a Dramaturgical Perspective." Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/97dfgb.
Full text國立臺北大學
法律學系一般生組
105
The purpose of this article is to answer the question: “How does fact-finding of unjust cases become possible?” This article reviewed the principle of free evaluation of evidence from its meaning to its defects, and assumed that the injustice occurred in finding facts under the principle of free evaluation of evidence will not be solved by only improving the rules of evidence because every rule has its limitations. The key to solve the problem may also lies in identifying and overcoming the limits of free evaluation of evidence. The question is how to see more clearly about criminal justice. Therefore, this article used Erving Goffman’s dramaturgical model to observe how the criminal justice works in Taiwan’s legal culture. Generally speaking, criminal litigation is regarded as a dramaturgical performance: the participants as performers. That is to say, the performance of criminal litigation is shaped by audience, thus influencing the free evaluation of evidence. Accordingly, whether it is possible to overcome the limitations of free evaluation of evidence depends on if lawyers can see more clearly about how criminal justice actually works. From the perspective of dramaturgical model, this means that the performers shall alienate themselves from their characters, and that legal training should not only enable lawyers to get into their characters but also to ensure the possibility of alienation.
Van, der Merwe C. J. (Christoffel Johannes). "Processing of information for prosecution purposes." Diss., 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2541.
Full textCriminology
M.Tech. (Forensic investigation)
Chen, Shih Han, and 陳思翰. "Search and Seizure of Digital Evidence in Criminal Procedure -Focusing on the Digital Information within Cloud Databases." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/kbj5cp.
Full text國立清華大學
科技法律研究所
105
Internet and cloud computing technology have been highly developed since 1970. There are different aspects of cloud computing application that cloud storage is one of the common and significant approach. This thesis is aimed to look into the search and seizure of digital evidence within cloud databases from a comparative viewpoint. The thesis begins with the brief introduction to internet and cloud computing technology, including the definitions, features and classifications. Afterward, it describes the search and seizure of digital evidence as a general, and it contains both case law in US and the recent study on the approaches and regulations in Taiwan. At last, it provides the research on search and seizure of digital evidence within cloud databases consisting of the consent search, warrant requirements and Stored Communications Act. Besides, it also illustrates the current investigations on searching and seizing of digital evidence within cloud databases in Taiwan.
LEE, CHIN-TING, and 李金定. "The Research On Discovery of Evidence In Criminal Procedual." Thesis, 2015. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/53755999327622950413.
Full text輔仁大學
法律學系
103
The typical criminal justice systems in the world can be roughly divided into the adversary/accusatorial system and the inquisitorial system, depending on whether or not the parties take dominant position in criminal proceedings. The criminal procedure system in Taiwan has been moving towards an adversary/accusatorial model from an inquisitorial one. Under the adversarial proceedings including the operation of cross-examination, the study on evidence discovery system is expected to become a major concern. This academic research is made in order to explore if the rights of both parties can be equally respected so as to ensure the successful functioning of this new system in the future. With a view to enhancing the defense capacity of the accused and imposing substantially burden of proof onto the prosecution as well, hearsay rule and cross-examination were adopted among others by Taiwan legislation in the Criminal Procedure Law in Taiwan. Yet the adversary system was not completely adopted in current Taiwanese criminal procedure. The amended system was baptized accordingly as the so-called “reformed adversary system”. In addition, the indictment-only doctrine of Japanese criminal legal system was taken by some researchers as a reform model in Taiwan. They argued the Japanese doctrine bears a potentiality for improving or at least reinforcing the current criminal procedure system. This paper basically agrees to those research conclusions: enabling the accused to get access to the evidence items which are held by the prosecutors in pre-trial phase can be one of the main problems we are going to confront, once an indictment-only system is introduced in our system. The so-called “evidence discovery” means whether a party shall fully demonstrate, in investigation or pre-trial proceedings, all the evidence in his or her custody to the other party and allow the opponent to inspect and copy those evidentiary items. Under general circumstances, the items of evidence obtained by the prosecution are much more than those by the accused. Thus, the main issue of evidence discovery in criminal proceedings is therefore concentrated in how and to what extent the prosecutors are to disclose to their defendants the evidence under their control. In other words, evidence discovery measures are indispensable in investigation or pre-trial phase in an indictment-only procedural setting. In Japan, the evidence discovery system has been carried out for quite a few years. Certainly the foreign system can give us certain enlightenment if we take a close look at its origin, practice and the developments over years, as well as the proposed measures for improving this system. A new evidence discovery system was implemented in Japan in November 2005. This paper is giving a brief introduction to its applicable cases, procedures, discovery methods, and related penalties provisions. Some discussions will be followed on the disputes in theory as well as in practice in the country. United-States, United-Kingdom and Canada are the three countries that keep long history of adversary system. As such, the existing practice and the future trend of their evidence discovery/disclosure systems are worth exploring. This article takes therefore a substantial part in discussing the issues in respect to the history, reforms, contents, and controversies of the discovery or disclosure system in each country. Judicial Yuan in Taiwan proposed a Trial Assessor System in June 2012. Some local courts have been thus designated as the “test” forums. If this new system is formally implemented in the future, the issue of evidence discovery will certainly be involved. One of the critical concerns is to combine evidence discovery system and the Trial Assessor System with a view to improving the efficiency of criminal trial and enhancing trial quality, enabling the criminal justice system to be closer to the expectation of the public. This thesis also puts forward with some stipulation suggestions on discovery provisions for preliminary proceedings so that the two previous systems can work better. In addition, certain discussion efforts are made as well with respect to the scope of discovery, mandatory defense with attorney, and the potential abuse of discovered evidence. At last but not the least, the paper made a brief review over the proposed amended provisions presented by the Supreme Court on evidence discovery system, with a humble hope that one might take it as reference for future amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law in Taiwan.
Spamers, Marozane. "A critical analysis of the psycholegal assessment of suspected criminally incapacitated accused persons as regulated by the Criminal Procedure Act." Diss., 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/25053.
Full textDissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2011.
Public Law
unrestricted
WANG, MING─HUEI, and 王敏慧. "A Study Of The Amended Criminal Procedure Law Of The People Republic Of China ─ The Exclusion Of Illegal Evidence." Thesis, 2015. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/yqcw22.
Full text東吳大學
法律學系
103
Abstract Because Criminal Procedure in Mainland China has emphasized on the pursuit of substantial reality for a long time, the exclusion of illegal evidence is naturally easy to be neglected. Furthermore, the investigators traditionally hold the notion of presumption of guilt, and they are under the pressure of hoping to break the case soon, as well as lacking investigation wisdom or facilities, so they may collect the evidence under illegal ways, one infringe upon human rights the most of those is extorting confession by torturing suspects or defendant. Although Criminal Procedure Law of People Republic of China has stipulated that it’s forbidden to illegally collect evidence, and judicial apparatuses have also issued explanations that a verdict shall not be based on illegal evidence, Criminal Procedure Law of People Republic of China doesn't eliminate the use of illegal evidence, and the said explanations eventually are not laws or regulations; therefore, the effectiveness of illegal evidence is still controversial. Secondly, in the event that a defendant claims that the evidence was obtained illegally, there is vacancy on operation procedure of investigation and exclusion, no matter in Criminal Procedure Law,of People Republic of China itself or relevant judicial explanations, causing it difficult or unable for judges to eliminate illegal evidence, and further resulting in the serious encroachment on suspect's or defendant's human rights. Hence, many wrongs are procured, and the governmental image and the people’s faith in judiciary are stricken. In order to solve the situation that illegally obtaining evidence result in serious encroachment on suspect’s or defendant's human rights, and moreover affect the discovery of reality, the authorities concerned in Mainland China added relevant articles and clauses to Criminal Procedure Law stipulating the Rule of eliminating illegal evidence and the protection for suspects and defendants in 2012, hoping those can prevent the action of illegally obtaining evidence from happening. In this essay, first, I will introduce the origin, development,meaning and advantages and disadvantages of Rule of eliminating illegal evidence. In addition, I will survey and analyze the elimination rules for illegal evidence and relevant measures in Criminal Procedure Law of People Republic of China and other judicial explanations in light of the emendation of Criminal Procedure Law of People Republic of China in 2012. Third, I will compare the newly-amended laws with the former one, to review the insufficiency for the newly-amended laws. Finally, the contribution of well-known wrongs in Mainland China will be analyzed, for discussing if there are other reasons contributing the wrongs besides the inadequacies of the laws and regulations. In the hope of comprehending if the Rule of eliminating illegal evidence and relevanjt implement in amended Criminal Procedure Law of People Republic of China in 2012 could achieve the goals of stopping extorting confession by torture taking place again, and provide some advice. Key Words: illegal evidence, Rule of eliminating illegal evidence, extorting confession by torture, right of silence
Klein, Jakub. "Dokazování elektronickými důkazními prostředky." Master's thesis, 2019. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-397087.
Full textCampos, Juliana Filipa Sousa. "O malware como meio de obtenção da prova em processo penal." Master's thesis, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/90363.
Full textNum momento em que a encriptação surge como uma resposta aos problemas que a privacidade enfrenta no plano digital, observa-se que a investigação criminal se depara com dificuldades na obtenção da prova da prática de crimes. Desse modo, avança-se com a introdução do malware no processo penal, o qual surge como um mecanismo “camaleónico” e sui generis, que potencia a obtenção de uma enorme quantidade de dados do sistema, mas também permite a recolha de prova externa, uma vez que possibilita a ativação de hardware. Assim, se por um lado a sua utilização se justifica em nome da descoberta da verdade material e da realização da justiça, por outro assiste-se a uma restrição de diversos direitos fundamentais do arguido, mas também de terceiros.Desta feita, recentemente, assistiu-se à sua consagração na legislação de diversos países europeus, mas também nos EUA, como um meio de obtenção da prova para dar resposta aos novos “fenómenos criminosos” que se socorrem de meios que ombreiam com os do Estado, tornando-se possível traçar um conjunto de requisitos comuns na sua previsão.Por sua vez, no ordenamento jurídico português, alguma doutrina vem defendendo a sua utilização a coberto das disposições existentes para outros meios de obtenção da prova já consagrados na lei processual penal, descurando as especificidades que aquele apresenta, o que levanta problemas de ilegalidade e insconstitucionalidade, não podendo o malware ser legitimado nesses preceitos. De facto, tem de ser o legislador, mediante lei expressa e determinada, a proceder à sua previsão autónoma e específica, exigindo-se que opere a concordância prática das finalidades em conflito.
At a time when encryption is emerging as an answer to the problems that privacy faces in the digital field, it is observed that criminal investigations are encountering difficulties in obtaining evidence of the commission of crimes. In this way, the introduction of malware into criminal proceedings is advanced, which appears as a "chameleonic" and sui generis mechanism, which enables the obtaining of an enormous amount of data from the system, but also allows the collection of external evidence, since it enables the activation of hardware. Thus, if on the one hand its use is justified in the name of the discovery of material truth and the realization of justice, on the other hand we are witnessing a restriction of several fundamental rights of the accused, but also of third parties.Thus, recently, it has been enshrined in the legislation of several European countries, but also in the United States, as a means of obtaining evidence to respond to the new "criminal phenomena" that use means that overlap with those of the State, making it possible to draw up a set of common requirements in its provision.In turn, in the Portuguese legal system, some doctrine has been defending its use under the cover of the existing provisions for other means of obtaining evidence already enshrined in the criminal procedural law, disregarding the specificities that it presents, which raises problems of illegality and unconstitutionality, and malware cannot be legitimated in these precepts. In fact, it must be the legislator, by means of an express and determined law, to proceed with its autonomous and specific provision, requiring it to operate the practical concordance of the conflicting purposes.
Faurie, Annari. "The admissibility and evaluation of scientific evidence in court." Diss., 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16774.
Full textCriminal & Procedural Law
LL.M. (Law)
Vopršal, Ondřej. "Zásada volného hodnocení důkazů v judikatuře." Master's thesis, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-297536.
Full textNcube, Njabulo. "Procedures for searching evidence in the investigation of computer-related crime in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe." Diss., 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/21021.
Full textThe continued advancement in myriad technological, societal and legal issues has affected the investigation of computer aided crimes. The investigators are confronted with tremendous impediments as the computer aided and traditional crime scenes differ. The study sought to analyse the procedures for searching evidence in the investigation of computer-related crime with the intention to improve admissibility of such evidence. The researcher employed empirical design to reach conclusions based upon evidence collected from observations and real life experiences. This aided the researcher to obtain information through face-to-face interviews. The study was qualitative in approach as it consisted of a set of interpretive and material practices that make the real social world visible. The training curriculum for investigators should include aspects of computer-related crime investigation, search and seizure of computer evidence. Search and collection of computer-related evidence should be done preferably by qualified forensic experts, so that evidence is accepted in court.
Police Practice
M. Tech. (Forensic Investigation)
Mokonyama, William Madimetja. "A critical analysis of the procedures followed to conduct identification parades : a case study in Mpumalanga, South Africa." Thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/3530.
Full textCriminology
Thesis (M.Tech. (Forensic Investigation))
Strydom, Jacoba Maria. "Bewysregtelike aspekte by 'n verweer van ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid in strafregtelike verrigtinge." Diss., 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16138.
Full textText in Afrikaans
'n Kort elementologiese uiteensetting vir strafregtelike aanspreeklikheid word gevolg deur bewysregtelike begrippe wat van toepassing is op vermoedens by toerekeningsvatbaarheid. Die historiese regsposisie asook die ontwikkeling in die huidige Suid-Afrikaanse reg met betrekking tot geestesongesteldes, kinders en persone wat 'n verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid insluit, word bespreek. Daar word gekonsentreer op ·die ontwikkeling van 'n algemene verweer van niepatologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid. Die konstitusionele reg, vennoedens en ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid word aan die hand van Suid-Afrikaanse regspraak en die Interim Grondwet bespreek. Daar word na buitelandse reg gekyk ten einde 'n aanbeveling te kan maak wat grondwetlik nie sal indruis op die reg van die individu tot onskuld nie. 'n Algemene verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningvatbaarheid word onderstellll mits dit met omsigtigheid deur die howe benader word. Die arbitrere ouderdomsgrens vir vasstelling van toerekeningsvatbaarheid by kinders word gekritiseer en 'n verhoorbaarheidvasstellingseenheid word aanbeveel.
A short elementological discussion of criminal responsibility is followed by concepts of law of evidence that is applicable to presumptions of accountability. The historical legal position as well as the development in the current South African law and the present legal position with reference to the mentally disturbed children and persons with a defence of non-pathological unaccountability are included and discussed. The constitutional law, presumptions and unaccountablility are discussed with reference to the South African case law and the Interim Constitution. Foreign law is perused so that a recommendation could be made that would not interfere with the rights of the individual to be deemed innocent. A general defence of non-pathological unaccountability is supported if it is treated with the necessary circumspection by the courts. The arbitrary age boundaries for the determination of accountability in children is critized and a unit to determine trialability for pathological and non-pathological accountability is recommended.
Criminal & Procedural Law
LL.M.
Zelenka, Jan. "Důsledky porušení předpisů o dokazování pro účinnost důkazů." Master's thesis, 2020. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-411561.
Full textRamatsoele, Pitso Petrus. "The ascertainment of bodily features of the accused person in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 and related enactments and problems encountered by the police in the application of the Act." Diss., 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/14212.
Full textCriminal & Procedural Law
LL.M.