To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Evidence.
Books on the topic 'Evidence'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Evidence.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Court, Philippines Supreme. Evidence: Rules of evidence. 5th ed. Manila, Philippines: Published and distributed by Rex Book Store, 1988.
Find full text
4
Commission, Australia Law Reform. Evidence. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1987.
Find full text
5
Emson, Raymond. Evidence. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36358-8.
Full text
6
Emson, Raymond. Evidence. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14994-0.
Full text
15
Emanuel, Steven. Evidence. 3rd ed. Austin: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business Aspen Publishers, 2007.
Find full text
20
R, Pollets John, Poreda Christopher, and Hughes Kenneth B, eds. Evidence. 2nd ed. St. Paul, Minn: West Group, 1998.
Find full text
22
Helene, Schonbrun, ed. Evidence. 3rd ed. Larchmont, NY: Emanuel Law Outlines, 1996.
Find full text
29
Goldsworthy, Andy. Evidence. London): Coracle Press (233 Camberwell New Road, S.E.5, 1985.
Find full text
33
Shaughnessy, Edward L. Evidence2 + Evidence3 = Evidence5 = Evidence = One: Further Remarks on the Evidential Method for Scholarship on Ancient China. Hong Kong University Press, 2014.
Find full text
35
The Evidence for Heaven (Faith Evidence) (Faith Evidence). Bridge-Logos Publishers, 2005.
Find full text
41
Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins. Evidence. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199682706.003.0004.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter offers a contextualist interpretation of Timothy Williamson's identification of evidence and knowledge (E=K); the result is a contextualist approach to “evidence” that matches the book's contextualist approach to “knows”. The resultant view is an attractive version of E=K that is resistant to many challenges in the literature. Evidence itself also has an important role to play in the book's relevant alternatives approach to knowledge; substantive questions about the nature and extent of basic evidence are foregrounded. The chapter departs from previous contextualist theories in embracing an externalist, disjunctivist conception of basic evidence, according to which perception directly delivers propositions about the external world as basic evidence.
42
Jockers, Matthew L. Evidence. University of Illinois Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252037528.003.0002.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter discusses new approaches and new methodologies in literary evidence gathering. Science derives conclusions based on evidence, and ideally, is open to new methodologies. Furthermore, science attempts to be exhaustive in the gathering of evidence as much as possible and must therefore welcome new modes of exploration, discovery, and analysis. This chapter emphasizes literary criticism's heavy reliance on associations as evidence and explains how literary studies differs from scientific experimentation. It also considers the advantages of “close reading,” the primary methodology used in the study of literature, and proceeds by looking at the ways that big data—the equivalent to digital libraries in literary studies—is changing the way data sampling is being undertaken. Finally, it describes how new methods of analysis allow us to extract new forms of evidence from the digital library.
46
Choo, Andrew L.-T. Evidence. 6th ed. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198864172.001.0001.
Full textAbstract:
Andrew Choo’s Evidence provides an account of the core principles of the law of civil and criminal evidence in England and Wales. It also explores the fundamental rationales that underlie the law as a whole. The text explores current debates and draws on different jurisdictions to achieve a mix of critical and thought-provoking analysis. Where appropriate the text draws on comparative material and a variety of socio-legal, empirical, and non-legal material. This (sixth) edition takes account of revisions to the Criminal Procedure Rules, the Criminal Practice Directions, and the Police and Criminal Evidence Act Codes of Practice. It also examines in detail cases on various topics decided since the last edition was completed, or the significance of which has become clear since then, including: • Addlesee v Dentons Europe llp (CA, 2019) (legal professional privilege) • Birmingham City Council v Jones (CA, 2018) (standard of proof) • R v B (E) (CA, 2017) (good character evidence) • R v Brown (Nico) (CA, 2019) (hearsay evidence) • R v C (CA, 2019) (hearsay evidence) • R v Chauhan (CA, 2019) (submissions of ‘no case to answer’) • R v Gabbai (Edward) (CA, 2019) (bad character evidence) • R v Gillings (Keith) (CA, 2019) (bad character evidence) • R v Hampson (Philip) (CA, 2018) (special measures directions) • R v K (M) (CA, 2018) (burden of proof) • R v Kiziltan (CA, 2017) (hearsay evidence) • R v L (T) (CA, 2018) (entrapment) • R v Reynolds (CA, 2019) (summing-up) • R v S (CA, 2016) (hearsay evidence) • R v SJ (CA, 2019) (expert evidence) • R v Smith (Alec) (CA, 2020) (hearsay evidence) • R v Stevens (Jack) (CA, 2020) (presumptions) • R v Townsend (CA, 2020) (expert evidence) • R v Twigg (CA, 2019) (improperly obtained evidence) • R (Jet2.com Ltd) v CAA (CA, 2020) (legal professional privilege) • R (Maughan) v Oxfordshire Senior Coroner (SC, 2020) (standard of proof) • Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corpn Ltd (CA, 2018) (legal professional privilege) • Shagang Shipping Co Ltd v HNA Group Co Ltd (SC, 2020) (foundational concepts; improperly obtained evidence) • Stubbs v The Queen (PC, 2020) (identification evidence) • Volaw Trust and Corporate Services Ltd v Office of the Comptroller of Taxes (PC, 2019) (privilege against self-incrimination) • Volcafe Ltd v Cia Sud Americana de Vapores SA (SC, 2018) (burden of proof)
47
Munday, Roderick. Evidence. 10th ed. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198832461.001.0001.
Full textAbstract:
Titles in the Core Text series take the reader straight to the heart of the subject, providing focused, concise, and reliable guides for students at all levels. Written by leading academics and renowned for their clarity, these concise texts explain the intellectual challenges of each area of the law. Evidence provides students with a succinct yet thought-provoking introduction to all of the key areas covered on undergraduate law of evidence courses. Vibrant and engaging, the book sets out to demystify a traditionally intimidating area of law. Probing analysis of the issues, both historical and current, ensures that the text contains a thorough exploration of the ‘core’ of the subject. The book covers: the relevance and admissibility of evidence; presumptions and the burden of proof; witnesses: competence, compellability and various privileges; the course of the trial; witnesses’ previous consistent statements and the remnants of the rule against narrative; character and credibility; evidence of the defendant’s bad character; the opinion rule and the presentation of expert evidence; the rule against hearsay; confessions; drawing adverse inferences from a defendant’s omissions, lies or false alibis; and identification evidence. A clearly structured introduction, this is the ideal text for any student who may find evidence a somewhat forbidding subject.
48
Munday, Roderick. Evidence. 11th ed. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192895660.001.0001.
Full textAbstract:
Titles in the Core Text series take the reader straight to the heart of the subject, providing focused, concise, and reliable guides for students at all levels. Written by leading academics and renowned for their clarity, these concise texts explain the intellectual challenges of each area of the law. Evidence provides students with a succinct yet thought-provoking introduction to all of the key areas covered on undergraduate law of evidence courses. Vibrant and engaging, the book sets out to demystify a traditionally intimidating area of law. Probing analysis of the issues, both historical and current, ensures that the text contains a thorough exploration of the ‘core’ of the subject. The book covers: the relevance and admissibility of evidence; presumptions and the burden of proof; witnesses: competence, compellability and various privileges; the course of the trial; witnesses’ previous consistent statements and the remnants of the rule against narrative; character and credibility; evidence of the defendant’s bad character; the opinion rule and the presentation of expert evidence; the rule against hearsay; confessions; drawing adverse inferences from a defendant’s omissions, lies or false alibis; and identification evidence. A clearly structured introduction, this is the ideal text for any student who may find evidence a somewhat forbidding subject.
49
Munday, Roderick. Evidence. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198788720.001.0001.
Full textAbstract:
Titles in the Core Text series take the reader straight to the heart of the subject, providing focused, concise, and reliable guides for students at all levels. Written by leading academics and renowned for their clarity, these concise texts explain the intellectual challenges of each area of the law. Evidence provides students with a succinct yet thought-provoking introduction to all of the key areas covered on undergraduate law of evidence courses. Vibrant and engaging, the book sets out to demystify a traditionally intimidating area of law. Probing analysis of the issues, both historical and current, ensures that the text contains a thorough exploration of the ‘core’ of the subject. The book covers: the relevance and admissibility of evidence; presumptions and the burden of proof; witnesses: competence, compellability and various privileges; the course of the trial; witnesses’ previous consistent statements and the remnants of the rule against narrative; character and credibility; evidence of the defendant’s bad character; the opinion rule and the presentation of expert evidence; the rule against hearsay; confessions; drawing adverse inferences from a defendant’s omissions, lies or false alibis; and identification evidence. A clearly structured introduction, this is the ideal text for any student who may find evidence a somewhat forbidding subject.
50
Choo, Andrew L.-T. Evidence. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806844.001.0001.
Full textAbstract:
Andrew Choo’s Evidence provides an account of the core principles of the law of civil and criminal evidence in England and Wales. It also explores the fundamental rationales that underlie the law as a whole. The text explores current debates and draws on different jurisdictions to achieve a mix of critical and thought-provoking analysis. Where appropriate the text draws on comparative material and a variety of socio-legal, empirical, and non-legal material. This (fifth) edition takes account of revisions to the Criminal Procedure Rules, the Criminal Practice Directions, and the Police and Criminal Evidence Act Codes of Practice. It also examines in detail cases on various topics decided since the last edition was completed, including:•Ibrahim v UK (ECtHR (GC), 2016) (confession evidence);•Myers v R (PC, 2015) (expert evidence);•R v Awoyemi (CA, 2016) (bad character evidence);•R v Brown (Edward) (CA, 2015) (legal professional privilege);•R v Evans (Chedwyn) (CA, 2016) (sexual behaviour evidence);•R v FNC (CA, 2015) (DNA evidence);•R v G (S) (CA, 2017) (vulnerable witnesses);•R v Hunter (Nigel) (CA, 2015) (good character evidence);•R v Lubemba (CA, 2014) (vulnerable witnesses);•R v Mitchell (SC, 2016) (bad character evidence);•R v Platt (CA, 2016) (bad character evidence);•R v Shanmugarajah (CA, 2015) (photographic evidence);•R v Tsekiri (CA, 2017) (DNA evidence).