Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Evidentiary standards / Books

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Evidentiary standards.

Books on the topic 'Evidentiary standards'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 3 June 2025

Last updated: 31 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 15 books for your research on the topic 'Evidentiary standards.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Means, Brian R. Federal habeas practitioner guide: AEDPA standards of review, evidentiary hearings, and related issues. California Dept. of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, 2004.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Raymond, Cox. 11 Evidentiary Standards in Financial Arbitrations. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199687862.003.0011.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter begins by discussing the concerns and priorities that banks and other financial institutions may have when determining applicable evidentiary procedures in the exercise of their procedural autonomy. It then examines two evidentiary standards of particular interest to financial institutions: the commercial confidentiality of documents and legal professional privilege. This is followed by discussions of evidentiary regimes of special importance and usefulness; new areas of challenge for evidence-taking in financial arbitration, with a focus on the emerging trend of multiple claims a

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Tsagourias, Nicholas. Risk and the Use of Force. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795896.003.0002.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter explores the impact on the rules of international law governing the use of force of the conceptualisation of security in terms of risks. It claims that anticipation and decision-making are central to the legal management of risks. For this reason, it first examines the place of pre-emptive and preventive self-defence in international law and then discusses evidentiary issues, decision-making procedures and standards. The political and legal debates over the 2003 military action against Iraq offer a useful background. The chapter aligns international relations approaches to risk, s

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Washburn, David A., Michael J. Beran, and J. David Smith. Metamemory in Comparative Context. Edited by John Dunlosky and Sarah (Uma) K. Tauber. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.21.

Full text

Abstract:

Demonstrations of animal memory were among the earliest experimental results obtained in psychology, but investigations of whether animals show metacognitive competencies are relatively new. Such investigations require innovative paradigms in which uncertainty can be created and empirically validated, methods by which nonverbal organisms can indicate their recognition of confidence or uncertainty, and systematic inquiry to determine whether such responses are externally, associatively generated or are subjective and metacognitive. This third point requires particular attention to balance compe

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Keane, Adrian, and Paul McKeown. 4. The burden and standard of proof. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198811855.003.0004.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter discusses the rules governing which party bears the legal and evidential burdens on which facts in issue. These rules can determine the eventual outcome of proceedings; determine which party has the right to begin adducing evidence in court; in what circumstances a defendant, at the end of the case for the prosecution, or claimant, may make a successful submission of no case to answer; and how the trial judge should direct the jury. The chapter begins by defining and distinguishing the legal, evidential, and other burdens, and then considers in detail which burden is borne by each

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Spencer, Maureen, and John Spencer. 2. Burden and standard of proof: presumptions. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198715795.003.0002.

Full text

Abstract:

The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions. Each book includes typical questions, bullet-pointed answer plans and suggested answers, author commentary and illustrative diagrams and flow charts. This chapter discusses the allocation of the burden of proof in civil and criminal trials, depending on who should bear the risk. In criminal trials the ‘presumption of innocence’ means that the burden is on the prosecution, unless reversed by express or implied statutory provision. The law of evidence safeguards what in some jurisdictions is a c

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Blome-Tillmann, Michael. ‘More Likely Than Not’Knowledge First and the Role of Bare Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198716310.003.0014.

Full text

Abstract:

In this chapter, Michael Blome-Tillmann argues that embracing a knowledge-first approach can help to resolve important epistemological problems in legal philosophy. Blome-Tillmann takes, as a starting point, a puzzle arising from the evidential standard Preponderance of the Evidence and its application in civil procedure. The evidential standard captured by Preponderance of the Evidence is usually glossed as ‘greater than 0.5 given the admissible evidence’. But this characterization generates puzzles, where our intuitions about whether a defendant should be found liable diverge in case pairs w

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Al-Achi, Antoine. An Introduction to Botanical Medicines. AGreenwood Publishing Group, Inc., 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9798400671968.

Full text

Abstract:

For those who want to make educated decisions about whether, and when, to use natural products, this text explains the most current scientific evidence of the roles that plants can play in our health: how they can prevent, modify, or treat disease. Since antiquity, humans have used botanicals to treat various conditions affecting their organ systems, and this book is built around explaining which plants may be used for major ailments affecting the various systems. The increasing availability of botanicals on the market, intended to be used as dietary supplements for health, has been fueled by

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Hannibal, Martin, and Lisa Mountford. 15. The Burden of Proof. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765905.003.0015.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter explains the rules governing the legal and evidential burdens of proof that decide which party has the responsibility of proving a fact in issue to the court. It then discusses the degree of persuasiveness the evidence must attain to satisfy the appropriate standard of proof and considers the human rights issues in those exceptional situations where the accused has the legal burden of proof. For both the prosecution and the defence, the rules that allocate the burden of proof and the degree of proof are fundamental to the outcome of a case at trial.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Hannibal, Martin, and Lisa Mountford. 15. The Burden of Proof. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198787679.003.0015.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter explains the rules governing the legal and evidential burdens of proof that decide which party has the responsibility of proving a fact in issue to the court. It then discusses the degree of persuasiveness the evidence must attain to satisfy the appropriate standard of proof and considers the human rights issues in those exceptional situations where the accused has the legal burden of proof. For both the prosecution and the defence, the rules that allocate the burden of proof and the degree of proof are fundamental to the outcome of a case at trial.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Hannibal, Martin, and Lisa Mountford. 15. The Burden of Proof. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198823216.003.0015.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter explains the rules governing the legal and evidential burdens of proof that decide which party has the responsibility of proving a fact in issue to the court. It then discusses the degree of persuasiveness the evidence must attain to satisfy the appropriate standard of proof including the test for a successful submission of no case to answer and considers the human rights issues in those exceptional situations where the accused has the legal burden of proof. For both the prosecution and the defence, the rules that allocate the burden of proof and the degree of proof are fundamenta

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Khodykin, Roman, and Carol Mulcahy. A Guide to the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration. Edited by Nicholas Fletcher. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198818342.001.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (the ‘Rules’) are widely used in international arbitration cases, regardless of the administering institution or the legal background of the parties. The updated Rules were adopted in 2010 and include mechanisms for the presentation of documents, witnesses of fact, and expert witnesses, as well as guidance on the conduct of evidentiary hearings, and the admissibility and assessment of evidence. They are widely accepted by the arbitration community and have become an international applicable standard. That said, the R

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Littlejohn, Clayton. Evidence and Its Limits. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198758709.003.0007.

Full text

Abstract:

On a standard way of thinking about the relationships between evidence, reasons, and epistemic justification, a subject’s evidence consists of her potential reasons for her beliefs, these reasons constitute the normative reasons that bear on whether to believe, and justification is taken to result from relations between a subject’s potential reasons for her beliefs and those beliefs. This chapter argues that this view makes a number of mistakes about the rational roles of reasons and evidence and explores some parallels between practical and theoretical reasons. Just as justified action is uno

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Lycan, William G. On Evidence in Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829720.001.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

This book offers an epistemology of philosophy itself, a partial method for philosophical inquiry. The epistemology features three ultimate sources of justified philosophical belief. First, common sense, in a carefully restricted sense of the term—the sorts of contingent propositions Moore defended against idealists and skeptics. Second, the deliverances of well confirmed science. Third, and more fundamentally, intuitions about cases, in a carefully specified sense of that term. Chapters 1–4 expound a version of Moore’s method and apply it to each of several issues. The version is shown to res

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Elliott, Kevin C., and Ted Richards, eds. Exploring Inductive Risk. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467715.001.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

According to the argument from inductive risk, scientists have responsibilities to consider the consequences of error when they set evidential standards for making decisions such as accepting or rejecting hypotheses. This argument has received a great deal of scholarly attention in recent years. Exploring Inductive Risk brings together a set of concrete case studies with the goals of illustrating the pervasiveness of inductive risk, assisting scientists and policymakers in responding to it, and moving theoretical discussions of this phenomenon forward. The book contains eleven case studies ran

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!